Biodiversity Data Journal :
Species inventory
|
Spatial distribution of Madeira Island Laurisilva endemic spiders (Arachnida: Araneae)
Corresponding author:
Academic editor: Emma McCarroll Shaw
Received: 07 Jan 2014 | Accepted: 12 Feb 2014 | Published: 14 Feb 2014
© 2014 Luís Crespo, Mário Boieiro, Pedro Cardoso, Carlos Aguiar, Isabel Amorim, Carla Barrinha, Paulo Borges, Dília Menezes, Fernando Pereira, Carla Rego, Sérvio Ribeiro, Israel Silva, Artur Serrano
This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Citation:
Crespo L, Boieiro M, Cardoso P, Aguiar C, Amorim I, Barrinha C, Borges P, Menezes D, Pereira F, Rego C, Ribeiro S, Silva I, Serrano A (2014) Spatial distribution of Madeira Island Laurisilva endemic spiders (Arachnida: Araneae). Biodiversity Data Journal 2: e1051. https://doi.org/10.3897/BDJ.2.e1051
|
Madeira island presents a unique spider diversity with a high number of endemic species, many of which are still poorly known. A recent biodiversity survey on the terrestrial arthropods of the native forest, Laurisilva, provided a large set of standardized samples from various patches throughout the island. Out of the fifty two species recorded, approximately 33.3% are Madeiran endemics, many of which had not been collected since their original description. Two new species to science are reported – Ceratinopsis n. sp. and Theridion n. sp. – and the first records of Poeciloneta variegata (Blackwall, 1841) and Tetragnatha intermedia Kulczynski, 1891 are reported for the first time for Madeira island. Considerations on species richness and abundance from different Laurisilva locations are presented, together with distribution maps for endemic species. These results contribute to a better understanding of spider diversity patterns and endemic species distribution in the native forest of Madeira island.
Macaronesia, terrestrial arthropods, island endemics, laurel forest, biodiversity hotspot
Interest on Madeira spider fauna started almost two centuries ago (
Laurisilva is a relict evergreen forest that covered part of the Mediterranean Basin during the Tertiary, being restricted nowadays to a few locations in the Macaronesian archipelagoes of the Azores, Madeira and Canary Islands, and in some secluded sites of North Africa (
The latest spider checklist (
Spiders were sampled using two standardized complementary techniques: pitfall trapping and direct sampling. Pitfall sampling was performed both in May-June 2006 (sites 1 to 28) and June 2007 (sites 29 to 36). A linear transect with 30 pitfall traps, 5 m apart, was set in each study site. Each trap consisted of a plastic cup (4.2 cm diameter by 7.8 cm height) protected with a plastic cover (15 cm diameter) attached ~3 cm aboveground to prevent flooding and loss of specimens. Ethyleneglicol (10%) and Turquin solution were used as preservatives in alternate traps along the linear transect (BALA protocol,
Direct sampling was performed in June 2007 for most sampling sites. The sampling design was semi-quantitative with a sampling unit defined as 30 minute/person of effective fieldwork. Direct sampling included the search of spiders in three microhabitats (under bark of dead tree trunks, mosses and lichens, on living tree trunks and under stones/leaf litter) with the collection of six replicates/microhabitat/site (total 18 samples per site).
For each spider species collected, we recorded information on sampling technique used, site location code (Table
Study sites, sampling date/period and collecting method. Geographic coordinates in decimal degrees.
Study sites | Sampling | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Code | Site | Lat. (N) | Long. (W) | Altitude (m) | Pitfall trapping period | Direct sampling period |
1 | Funduras | 32.7493 | -16.8114 | 500 | 22.V-05.VI.2006 | 04.VI.2007 |
2 | Funduras | 32.7540 | -16.8099 | 552 | 22.V-05.VI.2006 | 04.VI.2007 |
3 | Fajã da Nogueira – Levada Pte. Roquete | 32.7391 | -16.9156 | 1074 | 23.V-06.VI.2006 | - |
4 | Fajã da Nogueira – Mtdo. do Leacoque | 32.7415 | -16.9161 | 630 | 23.V-06.VI.2006 | 06.VI.2007 |
5 | Fajã da Nogueira – Casa do Levadeiro | 32.7406 | -16.9136 | 989 | 23.V-06.VI.2006 | - |
6 | Fajã da Nogueira – Mtdo. do Leacoque | 32.7418 | -16.9177 | 614 | 23.V-06.VI.2006 | 06.VI.2007 |
7 | Fajã da Nogueira – Tanque | 32.7425 | -16.9168 | 845 | 23.V-06.VI.2006 | 06.VI.2007 |
8 | Fajã da Nogueira – Til Gigante | 32.7457 | -16.9150 | 841 | 23.V-06.VI.2006 | 06.VI.2007 |
9 | Queimadas | 32.7873 | -16.9047 | 841 | 24.V-07.VI.2006 | 05.VI.2007 |
10 | Pico das Pedras | 32.7841 | -16.9055 | 883 | 24.V-07.VI.2006 | 05.VI.2007 |
11 | Achada do Teixeira | 32.7733 | -16.9081 | 1211 | 24.V-07.VI.2006 | 05.VI.2007 |
12 | Achada do Teixeira | 32.7762 | -16.9022 | 1103 | 24.V-07.VI.2006 | 05.VI.2007 |
13 | Ribeiro Frio – Viveiro | 32.7354 | -16.8864 | 906 | 24.V-06.VI.2006 | 05.VI.2007 |
14 | Ribeiro Frio – Cottages | 32.7319 | -16.8861 | 994 | 24.V-07.VI.2006 | 06.VI.2007 |
15 | Pico do Areeiro | 32.7231 | -16.9109 | 1533 | 24.V-07.VI.2006 | - |
16 | Pico do Areeiro | 32.7287 | -16.9202 | 1594 | 24.V-07.VI.2006 | - |
17 | Chão da Ribeira | 32.7933 | -17.1122 | 519 | 25.V-08.VI.2006 | 07.VI.2007 |
18 | Chão da Ribeira | 32.7957 | -17.1117 | 491 | 25.V-08.VI.2006 | 07.VI.2007 |
19 | Chão dos Louros | 32.7636 | -17.0190 | 748 | 25.V-08.VI.2006 | 07.VI.2007 |
20 | Encumeada | 32.7558 | -17.0143 | 999 | 25.V-08.VI.2006 | - |
21 | Ribeiro Bonito – Levada | 32.8047 | -16.9346 | 568 | 25.V-08.VI.2006 | 09.VI.2007 |
22 | Ribeiro Bonito – Ribeiro | 32.7985 | -16.9360 | 560 | 25.V-08.VI.2006 | 09.VI.2007 |
23 | Fanal | 32.8302 | -17.1585 | 755 | 26.V-09.VI.2006 | - |
24 | Fanal – Levada dos Cedros | 32.8259 | -17.1580 | 820 | 26.V-09.VI.2006 | 09.VI.2007 |
25 | Fanal | 32.8236 | -17.1560 | 890 | 26.V-09.VI.2006 | 09.VI.2007 |
26 | Fanal | 32.8226 | -17.1539 | 889 | 26.V-09.VI.2006 | 09.VI.2007 |
27 | Fanal | 32.8182 | -17.1521 | 1023 | 26.V-09.VI.2006 | 09.VI.2007 |
28 | Fanal | 32.8062 | -17.1409 | 1134 | 26.V-09.VI.2006 | 10.VI.2007 |
29 | Ginjas | 32.7758 | -17.0534 | 869 | 08-22.VI.2007 | 23.VI.2007 |
30 | Caramujo | 32.7722 | -17.0529 | 981 | 08-22.VI.2007 | - |
31 | Caramujo | 32.7746 | -17.0559 | 1001 | 08-22.VI.2007 | - |
32 | Rabaças | 32.7413 | -17.0783 | 993 | 10-24.VI.2007 | - |
33 | Rabaçal | 32.7647 | -17.1341 | 930 | 10-24.VI.2007 | 25.VI.2007 |
34 | Risco | 32.7608 | -17.1256 | 1048 | 10-24.VI.2007 | 25.VI.2007 |
35 | Casa do Elias | 32.8268 | -17.1883 | 814 | 26.VI-10.VII.2007 | - |
36 | Galhano | 32.7971 | -17.1729 | 975 | 27.VI-11.VII.2007 | - |
Sampling sites and distribution of endemic spider species in Madeira island. See Table
Distribution of endemic spider species in Madeira island. Circles: present records; rhombuses: records from
Distribution of endemic spider species in Madeira island. Circles: present records; rhombuses: records from
Distribution of endemic spider species in Madeira island. Circles: present records; rhombuses: records from
The study took place in Madeira island located in the Atlantic Ocean, approximately 1000 km from the Iberian Peninsula. Sampling was conducted in thirty-six sites (Table
This species was recently found for the first time in Madeira archipelago in an erosion cave of Deserta Grande island (
Its presence in laurel forest suggests being a native species and its occurence in the Balkans needs to be confirmed. In the Azores the species is very common in the laurel forest and in the canopies of low altitude orchards and exotic trees.
This macaronesian endemic is widespread in the Laurisilva of Madeira island. L. Crespo has examined the material cited as L. affinis from the Canary Islands, deposited at the Senckenberg Naturmuseum of Frankfurt, and questions their species affiliation. Additional taxonomic analyses are thus needed to clarify the taxonomic status of the Canary Islands specimens.
Madeira island (Fig.
Madeira island (Fig.
This is the first time this species was captured after its description (
Madeira island (Fig.
Records of C. variegatus are extremely scarce. After its formal description based on five specimens collected in Santo da Serra (
Madeira island (Fig.
Ceratinopsis acripes seems to be restricted to Laurisilva.
Madeira island (Fig.
Ceratinopsis infuscata seems to be restricted to Laurisilva, with an additional record from Santo da Serra (
Madeira island (Fig.
This is a new species to science, to be described in a future work. As the previous species of Ceratinopsis, it also seems to be restricted to Laurisilva.
Madeira island (Fig.
Madeira island (Fig.
This endemic species seems to be restricted to Laurisilva. The two records outside Laurisilva (
Madeira island (Fig.
Distribution data on L. impudicus is scarce consisting of only 4 records. This species seems to be associated with Laurisilva and the lack of congruence between historical data (
Madeira island (Fig.
Madeira island (Fig.
This is the third record of this species. Turinyphia maderiana seems to be restricted to Laurisilva.
This species was recently described (
Madeira island (Fig.
This species seems to be restricted to Laurisilva. Wunderlich (
Some confusion appears to exist regarding the identity of P. maderianus. Although most authors consider this species a valid taxon, some support that it is a synonymy of P. epularis (O. Pickard-Cambridge, 1872) (
Madeira island (Fig.
First record for Madeira island. It is possible that previous records of T. obtusa C. L. Koch, 1837 from the Madeira archipelago (
Madeira island (Fig.
Madeira island (Fig.
Previous records of E. maderianus were made by Schenkel (
Madeira island (Fig.
Madeira island (Fig.
This is a new species to science. It seems to be restricted to Laurisilva and is now being formally described (Van Keer, in prep.).
Fifty two spider species and 3145 specimens are accounted in this study. Out of these, 17 are Madeira’s endemics species (SIE) mostly restricted to Laurisilva. Range for most endemic spider species was expanded by this study (Figs
Species richness considerations
The highest values of species richness were found in sites 18, 7, 11, 12, 25 and 33, which were also among those with the largest number of endemics (Fig.
Species richness and abundance per study site. Sampling methods used, number of endemic (SIE), native and introduced species are presented for each site. Site codes as in Table
Site | Species richness (S) | Abundance (N) | Sampling methods | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Code | SIE | Native | Invasive | total | SIE | Native | Invasive | total | |
1 | 4 | 2 | 2 | 8 | 7 | 3 | 24 | 34 | Pitfall & direct sampling |
2 | 3 | 3 | 4 | 10 | 4 | 12 | 63 | 79 | Pitfall & direct sampling |
3 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 4 | Pitfall |
4 | 5 | 4 | 3 | 12 | 13 | 8 | 38 | 59 | Pitfall & direct sampling |
5 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 4 | Pitfall |
6 | 5 | 6 | 2 | 13 | 12 | 7 | 36 | 55 | Pitfall & direct sampling |
7 | 7 | 4 | 3 | 13 | 10 | 6 | 21 | 37 | Pitfall & direct sampling |
8 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 6 | 2 | 2 | 19 | 23 | Pitfall & direct sampling |
9 | 3 | 1 | 3 | 7 | 3 | 3 | 10 | 16 | Pitfall & direct sampling |
10 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 6 | 4 | 4 | 9 | 17 | Pitfall & direct sampling |
11 | 5 | 7 | 2 | 14 | 5 | 25 | 17 | 47 | Pitfall & direct sampling |
12 | 7 | 5 | 2 | 14 | 12 | 11 | 8 | 31 | Pitfall & direct sampling |
13 | 6 | 5 | 2 | 13 | 9 | 10 | 7 | 26 | Pitfall & direct sampling |
14 | 5 | 4 | 3 | 12 | 7 | 4 | 11 | 22 | Pitfall & direct sampling |
15 | 0 | 4 | 7 | 11 | 0 | 28 | 364 | 392 | Pitfall |
16 | 0 | 3 | 7 | 10 | 0 | 45 | 215 | 260 | Pitfall |
17 | 3 | 3 | 2 | 8 | 4 | 4 | 14 | 22 | Pitfall & direct sampling |
18 | 9 | 5 | 3 | 16 | 17 | 17 | 25 | 59 | Pitfall & direct sampling |
19 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 6 | Pitfall & direct sampling |
20 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 5 | 1 | 2 | 13 | 16 | Pitfall |
21 | 5 | 2 | 2 | 9 | 17 | 3 | 37 | 57 | Pitfall & direct sampling |
22 | 4 | 1 | 2 | 7 | 8 | 1 | 20 | 29 | Pitfall & direct sampling |
23 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 5 | Pitfall |
24 | 3 | 5 | 3 | 11 | 7 | 22 | 22 | 51 | Pitfall & direct sampling |
25 | 6 | 6 | 2 | 8 | 11 | 12 | 19 | 42 | Pitfall & direct sampling |
26 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 5 | 0 | 7 | 7 | 14 | Pitfall & direct sampling |
27 | 2 | 4 | 3 | 9 | 3 | 7 | 9 | 19 | Pitfall & direct sampling |
28 | 5 | 4 | 3 | 12 | 5 | 9 | 15 | 29 | Pitfall & direct sampling |
29 | 4 | 2 | 2 | 8 | 6 | 5 | 11 | 22 | Pitfall & direct sampling |
30 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 5 | Pitfall |
31 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | Pitfall |
32 | 0 | 6 | 6 | 12 | 0 | 11 | 49 | 60 | Pitfall |
33 | 7 | 5 | 2 | 14 | 11 | 7 | 17 | 35 | Pitfall & direct sampling |
34 | 7 | 3 | 1 | 11 | 9 | 3 | 8 | 20 | Pitfall & direct sampling |
35 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 5 | 7 | Pitfall |
36 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 12 | 15 | Pitfall |
This study reveals a high number of endemic spider species in some locations, such as Chão da Ribeira (sites 17 and 18), Rabaçal (site 33), Risco (site 34), Achada do Teixeira (sites 11 and 12), Ribeiro Frio (sites 13 and 14), Fajã da Nogueira (sites 3 to 8) and Fanal (sites 23 to 28) that should therefore be the focus of further conservation biology of Madeiran spiders and their associated habitats. Those sites are the only where Centromerus variegatus, Ceratinopsis infuscata, Dipoenata longitarsis, Frontinellina dearmata, Frontiphantes fulgurenotatus and Lepthyphantes mauli are known to occur. However, the occurrence of these araneoid spiders in other locations within Madeira island is expected since they have a potentially high dispersal ability.
This is the first time that a large set of standardized samples of spiders from Madeira island is reported. The distribution of several Madeiran endemic species was greatly increased, particularly Macarophaeus cultior, Hahnia insulana, Turinyphia maderiana, Trogloneta madeirensis, Rugathodes madeirensis and Episinus maderianus. Other endemics were recorded in fewer sites, but in most cases such species are still associated with Laurisilva. In some instances, the historical distribution of endemic spider species includes areas no longer covered by Laurisilva. An example is a record of Centromerus variegatus from Santo da Serra (
The need to apply a combination of sampling techniques in a standardized design in order to assess species composition and structure of ecological communities has been strongly emphasized in the last few years by different authors (
In complex habitats like Laurisilva, the prospection of microhabitats such as fallen logs and trees, tree holes, under tree bark and epiphytes allows the finding of species with highly specialized niches. Furthermore, several spider species seldom move or do not move at all at ground level, making direct sampling the most suitable detection technique. From the 52 spider species reported, 16 were collected exclusively using pitfall traps while 22 other species were only found by direct sampling. On the other hand, direct sampling proved to be an effective method to sample Madeiran endemics since most of the sampled endemic spider species were only collected using this technique (see also Fig.
The original descriptions of some Madeiran endemics do not allow inequivocal identification since they were based on very few specimens or on specimens of a single gender. Thus, taxonomic revisions of several genera or families (i.e. Dysdera Latreille, 1804, Hahnia C.L. Koch, 1841, or the Linyphiidae) are mandatory for a better understanding of Madeiran spider biodiversity. Besides the merits of the present study in improving the knowledge on the distribution of spider species in Madeira island, it also allowed the collection of a number of specimens that will be the aim of future taxonomic studies, such as species redescriptions and formal descriptions of new species to science.
Madeira Laurisilva presents a unique spider biodiversity and efforts should be made towards improving knowledge on the abundance and distribution of endemic species as well as to develop a strategy for their conservation and monitoring.
We acknowledge Madeira Natural Park, particularly Herculano Fernandes and Martinho Gomes, for the valuable support during fieldwork. Financial support was provided by Fundação para a Ciência e Tecnologia (FCT, Portugal) through projects PDCT/BIA-BDE/59202/2004 and PTDC/BIABEC/99138/2008 (http://www.fct.pt/). CR was supported by grant SFRH/BPD/91357/2012, and IR by grants SFRH/BPD/29578/2006 (FCT, Portugal) and M3.1.7/F/030/2011 (FRCT, Açores, Portugal).
Data from where Figures 5 and 6 were built.