Biodiversity Data Journal :
Taxonomic paper
|
Ichthyofauna of the Kubo, Tochikura, and Ichinono river systems (Kitakami River drainage, northern Japan), with a comparison of predicted and surveyed species richness
Corresponding author:
Academic editor: Rupert Collins
Received: 28 Mar 2014 | Accepted: 23 Oct 2014 | Published: 07 Nov 2014
© 2014 Yusuke Miyazaki, Masanori Nakae, Hiroshi Senou
This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Citation:
Miyazaki Y, Nakae M, Senou H (2014) Ichthyofauna of the Kubo, Tochikura, and Ichinono river systems (Kitakami River drainage, northern Japan), with a comparison of predicted and surveyed species richness. Biodiversity Data Journal 2: e1093. https://doi.org/10.3897/BDJ.2.e1093
|
The potential fish species pool of the Kubo, Tochikura, and Ichinono river systems (tributaries of the Iwai River, Kitakami River drainage), Iwate Prefecture, northern Japan, was compared with the observed ichthyofauna by using historical records and new field surveys. Based on the literature survey, the potential species pool comprised 24 species/subspecies but only 20, including 7 non-native taxa, were recorded during the fieldwork. The absence during the survey of 11 species/subspecies from the potential species pool suggested either that sampling effort was insufficient, or that accurate determination of the potential species pool was hindered by lack of biogeographic data and ecological data related to the habitat use of the species. With respect to freshwater fish conservation in the area, Lethenteron reissneri, Carassius auratus buergeri, Pseudorasbora pumila, Tachysurus tokiensis, Oryzias latipes, and Cottus nozawae are regarded as priority species, and Cyprinus rubrofuscus, Pseudorasbora parva, and Micropterus salmoides as targets for removal.
Act on the Promotion of Nature Restoration, identification, nature restoration committee, potential species pool
Biodiversity is rapidly declining at a global level due to a variety of anthropogenic pressures (
Understanding a region’s biota is critical for successful nature restoration projects, particularly with respect to biodiversity conservation. When detailed survey data are lacking, determining a region’s potential species pool (
The nature restoration committee of the Kubo-gawa Ihatov area represents one of the projects based on the Law for the Promotion of Nature Restoration, but is unique in being overseen by private sector administration (
In this study, we consulted historical literature to determine the potential species pool of this region (i.e., the species we predict to occur there), and carried out comprehensive field surveys to "ground truth" this list, as well as to identify fish species of conservation and restoration concern.
The study region is located in the Kubo, Tochikura and Ichinono river systems (38°52′–38°55′ N, 140°56′–141°03′ E; Fig.
Examples of the study sites.
The potential fish species pool of the study region was determined by a review of existing literature (
The fish fauna was assessed during field surveys using hand nets, minnow traps, cast nets, set nets, and hook-and-line angling. More than 200 irrigation ponds and three sampling sites (upper, middle and lower reaches) in each of the three rivers were sampled from April to October in 2008, 2009 and 2010 (Fig.
Voucher specimens and photographs are deposited in the Kanagawa Prefectural Museum of Natural History, Odawara, Japan (KPM) and the National Museum of Nature and Science, Tsukuba, Japan (NSMT). Unless otherwise stated, the systematic arrangement of families and scientific names follows
To evaluate the accuracy of the potential species pool (the predicted ichthyofauna), we made rarefaction curves based on presence/absence data from our field surveys. This allows us to estimate the number of additional species that our surveys may have missed. These analyses were conducted using EstimateS with the bias-corrected formula (
The voucher specimens and photographs are deposited and registered as KPM-NI 19440, 19447–19454, 211181–21203, 21217–21227, 21398–21413, 22248–22313, 22429–22432, 23639–23659, 23738–23745, 23933–24000, 24396–24398, 24407–24419, 24466–24476, 24988–24994, 30997–30999, 31003, 31005–31007, 31009, 31011, 31018, 31715–31811, and 35077–35105, KPM-NR 43909–43911, and NSMT-P 90703–90723, 91185–91208, 91638–91652, 92194–92195, 96055–96061, 96828–96833, 96836–96860, 96890–96902, 97045, 97084, and 97109–97111.
The information of these vouchers has been submitted to the Global Information Facility (http://www.gbif.org/) via the museums.
National: VU (
Arctic and Pacific Ocean drainage.
This taxon is morphologically identical to L. sp. N and L. sp. S of
Non-native (100 of the World's Worst Invasive Alien Species:
Laos, Vietnam, and China (Amur to Red River drainages).
This taxon is identical with Cyprinus carpio of
Non-native (domestic non-native Species in Iwate Prefecture:
Endemic to Lake Biwa, Japan.
This species was captured an irrigation pond with dense aquatic plants.
National: VU (
This taxon is identical to Carassius buergeri subsp. 2 of
Non-native (100 of the Japanese Worst Invasive Alien Species:
Non-native (domestic non-native species in Iwate Prefecture:
This taxon is referred to as Opsariichthys platypus by
We do not follow the Catalog of Fishes, but follow
This species was recorded from fast currents of the lotic environments, but larvae and juveniles were sometimes recorded from slower flowing parts of the rivers.
Non-native (domestic non-native species in Iwate Prefecture:
This species was captured only from lentic enviroments, and was often found together with Cyprinus rubrofuscus.
National: CR (
This taxon is identical to Pseudorasbora pumila pumila of
Prefectural: DD (
This species was only collected from the lotic environmentsin the present study.
National: DD (
This species was only recorded from the lentic environment of the region.
This taxon is identical with Cobitis sp. BIWAE type C of
National: VU (
This species usually inhabits lotic environments of river (
This species was recorded from lotic environments in our surveys.
National: NT (
This species was recorded from lotic environments in our surveys.
Non-native (See Discussion)
National: VU (
The species was recorded only from irrigation ponds with rich aquatic plants in the study.
Non-native (100 of the World's and Japanese Worst Invasive Alien Species:
This non-native invasive species was recorded only from irrigation ponds on our surveys.
National: LP (
This species usually inhabitsfast lotic waters (
Japanese researchers have considered that the Rhinogobius brunneus complex currently includes many valid, synonymous species,and potentially several undescribed species (
Following the literature review, 35 freshwater fish taxa, including subspecies, belonging to 12 families in eight orders were considered to occur naturally in Iwate Prefecture (Table
List of fishes occurring naturally in Iwate Prefecture, northern Japan. From this list the potential species pool was determined by the literature review (ref.
Taxon | Standard Japanese Name | National Red List | Prefectural Red List | Nonnative Species | Potential Species Pool | Kubo River | Tochikura River | Ichinono River | Ponds of Kubo Riv. Sys. | Ponds of Tochikura Riv. Sys. | Ponds of Ichinono Riv. Sys. | Literature |
Lethenteron camtschaticum | Kawa-yastume | VU | CR+EN | NO | YES | NO | NO | NO | NO | NO | NO | |
Lethenteron reissneri | Suna-yatsume | VU | NT | NO | YES | YES | YES | YES | NO | NO | NO | |
Anguilla japonica | Nihon-unagi | EN | NO | YES | NO | NO | NO | NO | NO | NO | ||
Cyprinus rubrofuscus | Koi | - | - | YES | NO | YES | YES | NO | YES | YES | YES | |
Carassius cuvieri | Gengorō-buna | - | - | YES | NO | NO | NO | NO | YES | NO | NO | |
C. auratus auratus | Gin-buna | NO | YES | NO | NO | NO | NO | NO | NO | |||
C. auratus buergeri | Kin-buna | VU | NT | NO | YES | YES | NO | YES | YES | YES | YES | |
Acheilognathus melanogaster | Tanago | EN | LC | NO | NO | NO | NO | NO | NO | NO | NO | |
A. typus | Zeni-tanago | CR | CR+EN | NO | NO | NO | NO | NO | NO | NO | NO | |
Rhodeus ocellatus ocellatus | Tairiku-bara-tanago | - | - | YES | NO | YES | NO | NO | YES | NO | NO | |
Zacco platypus | Oikawa | - | - | YES | NO | YES | YES | YES | NO | NO | NO | |
Rhynchocypris steindachneri | Abura-haya | NO | YES | YES | YES | YES | YES | YES | YES | |||
Tribolodon brandtii | Maruta | NO | YES | NO | NO | NO | NO | NO | NO | |||
T. ezoe | Ezo-ugui | LP | NT | NO | YES | NO | NO | NO | NO | NO | NO | |
T. hakonensis | Ugui | NO | YES | YES | YES | YES | NO | NO | NO | |||
Pseudorasbora parva | Motsugo | - | - | YES | NO | YES | YES | NO | YES | YES | NO | |
P. pumila | Shinai-motsugo | CR | CR+EN | NO | YES | NO | NO | NO | YES | NO | NO | |
Pseudogobio esocinus esocinus | Kamatsuka | DD | NO | YES | NO | YES | YES | NO | NO | NO | ||
Hemibarbus labeo | Nigoi | NO | NO | NO | NO | NO | NO | NO | NO | |||
Misgurnus anguillicaudatus | Dojō | DD | NO | YES | YES | YES | YES | YES | YES | YES | ||
Cobitis biwae | Higashi-shima-dojō | NO | YES | YES | YES | YES | YES | YES | NO | |||
Lefua echigonia | Hotoke-dojō | EN | NO | YES | NO | NO | NO | NO | NO | NO | ||
Tachysurus tokiensis | Gibachi | VU | NO | YES | YES | YES | YES | YES | YES | NO | ||
Hypomesus nipponensis | Wakasagi | NO | NO | NO | NO | NO | NO | NO | NO | |||
Plecoglossus altivelis altivelis | Ayu | NO | YES | NO | NO | NO | NO | NO | NO | |||
Salvelinus leucomaenis leucomaenis | Ame-masu, Ezo-iwana | NO | YES | NO | NO | NO | NO | NO | NO | |||
S. leucomaenis pluvinus | Nikkō-iwana | DD | NO | YES | NO | NO | NO | NO | NO | NO | ||
Oncorhynchus keta | Sake | NO | YES | YES | YES | YES | NO | NO | NO | |||
O. masou masou | Sakura-masu, Yamame | NT | NO | YES | NO | YES | YES | NO | NO | NO | ||
Gasterosteus nipponicus | Nihon-itoyo | LP | LC | NO | NO | NO | NO | NO | NO | NO | NO | |
Oryzias latipes | Minami-medaka | VU | VU | YES | NO | NO | NO | NO | YES | NO | YES | |
Micropterus salmoides | Ōkuchi-basu | - | - | YES | NO | NO | NO | NO | YES | NO | YES | |
Cottus kazika | Kamakiri | VU | NO | NO | NO | NO | NO | NO | NO | NO | ||
C. pollux | Kajika | NT | NT | NO | YES | NO | NO | NO | NO | NO | NO | |
C. nozawae | Hana-kajika | LP | VU | NO | YES | YES | NO | NO | NO | NO | NO | |
Tridentiger brevispinis | Numa-chichibu | NO | NO | NO | NO | NO | NO | NO | NO | |||
Rhinogobius nagoyae | Shima-yoshibobori | NO | YES | NO | NO | NO | NO | NO | NO | |||
R. brunneus | Tö-yoshinobori | NO | YES | NO | NO | NO | NO | NO | NO | |||
Gymnogobius urotaenia | Ukigori | NO | NO | NO | NO | NO | NO | NO | NO | |||
G. opperiens | Shima-ukigori | NO | NO | NO | NO | NO | NO | NO | NO | |||
G. castaneus | Juzukake-haze | NT | NO | NO | NO | NO | NO | NO | NO | NO |
Twenty freshwater fish species/subspecies belonging to 9 families in 6 orders were recorded during field surveys (Figs
Fishes collected from the Kubo, Tochikura, and Ichinono Rivers.
Fishes collected from the Kubo, Tochikura, and Ichinono Rivers (continued).
Fishes collected from the Kubo, Tochikura, and Ichinono Rivers (continued).
Fishes collected from the Kubo, Tochikura, and Ichinono Rivers (continued).
Fishes collected from the Kubo, Tochikura, and Ichinono river systems (continued).
Among the 20 species collected in the field were nine national/prefectural red list species (Lethenteron reissneri, Carassius auratus buergeri, Pseudorasbora pumila, Pseudogobio esocinus esocinus, Misgurnus anguillicaudatus, Tachysurus tokiensis, Oncorhynchus masou masou, Oryzias latipes, and Cottus nozawae:
The rarefaction curves of survey data from irrigation ponds and rivers are shown in Fig.
Only 13 of the 24 species/subspecies from our estimated potential species pool were collected during field surveys, including nine national/prefectural red list species (Table
Ten species/subspecies of the potential species pool for the survey area were not recorded during field surveys (Table
The possibility that insufficient sampling efforts influenced the results of the present study is supported by the rarefaction curve as described below. The curve analyzed by using the presence/absence data of the irrigation ponds suggests that no more native species will be recorded from the ponds of the region due to the curve reaching saturation (Fig.
The Kubo and Tochikura Rivers are both dammed, and Zacco platypus, Pseudogobio esocinus esocinus, and Oncorhynchus keta were not recorded upstream of the dams. This suggests that the dams have negatively affected migratory behavior in these species (although Z. platypus is a naturalized non-native species).
The meta-population of Oryzias latipes in the study region was possibly introduced by local residents. The altitude at which it was recorded (105–160 m) is perhaps too high to consider this a natural occurrence. Populations of O. latipes in Kanagawa Prefecture naturally occur at a height of ~30 m above sea level (Senou unpublished), for example. Additionally, the specimens collected did not exhibit breeding condition, except at one sampling site (
Although we tentatively identified all specimens of the genus Carassius, except for C. cuvieri, as C. auratus buergeri, the specimens display some morphological variability. One specimen (KPM-NI 23745: Fig.
Among the red list species recorded in the present study, Lethenteron reissneri, Pseudorasbora pumila, Tachysurus tokiensis, Oryzias latipes, and Cottus nozawae (threatened species) were rare and are considered vulnerable. Further research of these species is required, particularly with regard to their population dynamics and conservation in the Kubo-gawa Ihatov area. Similarly, the population dynamics and extended distributions of the non-native and invasive species should be studied in greater detail with a special focus on potential methods of removal. In particular: Cyprinus rubrofuscus, which has been reported as having highly negative effects on native macrophytes and odonates in the region (
We refer the above suggestions to the focal nature restoration committee (see also
The determination of the freshwater fish species pool of a given region is an essential first step in restoration ecology (
We are especially grateful to G. Chisaka, R. Sato (Nature Restoration Research Institute of Kubo-kawa Ihatov),Y. Sekizaki (InterRisk Research Institute & Consulting, Inc.), H. Takeda (The University of Tsukuba), S. Deguchi, S. Nishihara, T. Okeda, S. Suda, I. Washitani (The University of Tokyo), T. Kadoya (National Institute for Environmental Studies) and Y. Takata (Osaka Museum of Natural History) for assistance with the field surveys. We also thank R. Takahashi and other volunteer staff (KPM), K. Kuriiwa (The University of Ryukyus), T. P. Satoh, G. Shinohara, and K. Matsuura (NSMT) for specimen registrations and some identifications. A special thanks to G. Yearsley (Hobart, Tasmania), R. Collins, M. Ford, and an anonymous reviewer for commenting on the manuscript. This study was partly supported by Grants-in-Aids from Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology, Japan [no. 22310143 (to H. Senou), and no. 25·11038 (to Y. Miyazaki, JSPS Research Fellow)].