1urn:lsid:arphahub.com:pub:F9B2E808-C883-5F47-B276-6D62129E4FF4urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:245B00E9-BFE5-4B4F-B76E-15C30BA74C02Biodiversity Data JournalBDJ1314-28361314-2828Pensoft Publishers10.3897/BDJ.5.e11407114076699Research ArticleNew evidence shows that Pocillopora ‘damicornis-like’ corals in Singapore are actually Pocilloporaacuta (Scleractinia: Pocilloporidae)Poquita-DuRosa Celia12NgChin Soon Lionel12LooJun Bin3Afiq-RosliLutfi2TayYwee Chieh12ToddPeter A12ChouLoke Ming2HuangDanweihuangdanwei@nus.edu.sghttps://orcid.org/0000-0003-3365-558312Department of Biological Sciences, National University of Singapore, Singapore, SingaporeDepartment of Biological Sciences, National University of SingaporeSingaporeSingaporeTropical Marine Science Institute, National University of Singapore, Singapore, SingaporeTropical Marine Science Institute, National University of SingaporeSingaporeSingaporeSchool of Chemical and Life Sciences, Singapore Polytechnic, Singapore, SingaporeSchool of Chemical and Life Sciences, Singapore PolytechnicSingaporeSingapore
2017130220175e114074126BC62-FFC4-F27C-FFA3-585BB760FF8A2906740512201607022017Rosa Celia Poquita-Du, Chin Soon Lionel Ng, Jun Bin Loo, Lutfi Afiq-Rosli, Ywee Chieh Tay, Peter A Todd, Loke Ming Chou, Danwei HuangThis is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Molecular sequence data have previously revealed the existence of cryptic species associated with the Pocillopora ‘damicornis-like’ coral. Recently, this species complex has been reclassified into three species including the resurrected P.acuta, which appears to have a wide distribution. Morphological characteristics described for P.acuta are present in corals previously identified as Pocilloporadamicornis. To determine if the Pocillopora ‘damicornis-like’ colonies on Singapore’s reefs are P.acuta, P.damicornis, or both, we examined a new collection of Pocillopora using mitochondrial DNA data and morphology. We also compared specimen morphologies from past collections and examined the known regional distributions of both species. Our analyses show that most Pocillopora ‘damicornis-like’ corals in Singapore are P.acuta instead of P.damicornis. Findings here are important for coral diversity records in Singapore and will help clarify distributional limits of morphologically similar Pocillopora species.
biodiversitycryptic speciesdistributionmuseum specimensphylogenetic analysisPocilloporaNational Research Foundation Singapore501100001381http://doi.org/10.13039/501100001381Introduction
Numerous hard coral species exhibit substantial intraspecific morphological variation (Foster 1977, Foster 1983, Veron 1995), which is observable at intracolonial, intrapopulation and interpopulation levels (Best et al. 1984). Such variability can arise from genetic differences or phenotypically plastic responses to the surrounding environment (Todd et al. 2004, Pinzón et al. 2013). As coral taxonomy is largely reliant on skeletal morphology (e.g. Veron 2000), such variability can potentially blur species limits and render identification difficult.
The genus Pocillopora Lamarck, 1816, is of special interest as it is characterised by exceptionally high levels of phenotypic variation (Veron 2000, Flot and Tillier 2006, Schmidt-Roach et al. 2014a), and its species are frequently used as models in ecological and experimental studies. Due to a lack of clear morphological traits to distinguish among species, some taxa have historically been synonymised. For example, Pocilloporadamicornis (Linnaeus, 1758) has had at least five synonyms (P.acuta Lamarck, 1816; P.brevicornis Lamarck, 1816; P.bulbosa Ehrenberg, 1834; P.favosa Ehrenberg, 1834; and P.caespitosa Dana, 1846), which are all considered to be morphological variants of a single complex associated with different environments (Veron and Pichon 1976, Veron 2000, Schmidt-Roach et al. 2013).
Recently, P.acuta was re-established as an entirely separate species from P.damicornis based on differences in their mitochondrial open reading frame (ORF) sequences (Schmidt-Roach et al. 2014a). Pocilloporaacuta also differs from P.damicornis by possessing more elongated, sharper and thinner branchlets, as well as having dark brown pigmentation around the oral openings of the polyps (Schmidt-Roach et al. 2014a).
The morphological characteristics described for P.acuta are exhibited by corals previously identified as Pocilloporadamicornis in Singapore. Based on this observation, we hypothesise that most of the Pocillopora colonies on Singapore’s reefs are likely to be P.acuta and not P.damicornis. Here, we examine a range of P. ‘damicornis-like’ (sensuPinzón et al. 2013) colony morphologies, their mitochondrial ORF sequences, and verify their taxonomic identity as the basis for characterisation of P.acuta or P.damicornis in Singapore.
Results of this study are important for coral diversity records in Singapore and will also help clarify the geographical range limits of morphologically closely-related Pocillopora species. As one of the most widespread corals on Singapore's reefs (Huang et al. 2009), these P. ‘damicornis-like’ colonies are able to settle and grow on natural reefs and even artificial substrates such as seawalls and pontoons (Toh et al. 2017). Consequently, they are widely utilised in reef restoration research (Ng et al. 2016). Their accurate identification, whether they are P.acuta or P.damicornis, is critical for achieving species diversity targets in local and regional restoration efforts (Mace 2004, Wheeler 2004). Similar to other corals, Pocillopora is threatened by habitat loss and climate change, so a clear understanding of species boundaries will facilitate the conservation of species under this genus.
Materials and methods
Sixteen Pocillopora samples were collected from five coral reef sites across the southern offshore islands of Singapore. We focused on a wide range of colony morphologies that, following Veron and Pichon (1976) and Veron (2000), had been identified previously as P.damicornis. We photographed each colony in the field before part or all of it was collected. A 1-cm length of a branch was preserved in 100% ethanol while the rest of the colony sample was soaked in freshwater, bleached in 2% sodium hypochlorite, then rinsed, cleaned and dried. These samples (Fig. 1), along with others loaned from the Zoological Reference Collection (ZRC; Fig. 2) at the Lee Kong Chian Natural History Museum (LKCNHM, Singapore), were photographed and characterised according to the diagnostic characters specified by Schmidt-Roach et al. (2014a).
DNA was extracted by overnight digestion in hexadecyltrimethylammonium bromide (CTAB) and proteinase K, followed by phase separation using phenol: chloroform: isoamyl-alcohol (25:24:1). Polymerase chain reactions primed using FATP6.1 and RORF were performed according to Flot et al. (2008) for amplifying the mitochondrial open reading frame (Flot and Tillier 2007). Reaction products were purified using SureClean Plus (Bioline) and sequenced with the 3730xl DNA Analyzer (Thermo Fisher Scientific). Sequences were deposited in GenBank (accession numbers KY587458–KY587472).
We compiled in Mesquite 3.10 (Maddison and Maddison 2016) the sequences obtained here combined with 146 sequences available in GenBank (Schmidt-Roach et al. 2012, Schmidt-Roach et al. 2013, Marti-Puig et al. 2014), which were derived from Pocilloporaeydouxi and P.ligulata—designated as outgroups in our analyses—as well as P.damicornis, P.acuta, P.aliciae, P.verrucosa and P.meandrina (Types α, β, δ, γ and m, respectively, according to Schmidt-Roach et al. 2014a). Alignments were carried out in MAFFT 7.205 using default parameters (Katoh and Standley 2013, Katoh and Toh 2008, Katoh et al. 2002), and the 850-bp data matrix was analysed phylogenetically under maximum likelihood and Bayesian optimality criteria.
We used RAxML 8.0.9 (Stamatakis 2006, Stamatakis 2014, Stamatakis et al. 2008) for maximum likelihood analysis, generating 50 alternate runs from distinct parsimony starting trees with the default GTRGAMMA substitution model. Branch supports were assessed via 1000 replicates of bootstrap analysis. For Bayesian analysis, we first selected the most suitable evolutionary model for the data (GTR + I) using jModelTest 2.1.10 (Guindon and Gascuel 2003, Darriba et al. 2012, Posada 2008), following the Akaike information criterion (AIC). Then, Bayesian inference was carried out using MrBayes 3.2.5 (Huelsenbeck and Ronquist 2001, Ronquist and Huelsenbeck 2003, Ronquist et al. 2012), implementing six million generations of Markov chain Monte Carlo in two separate runs and saving a tree every hundredth generation. We used Tracer 1.6 (Rambaut et al. 2014) to assess convergence among the runs, and determined that the first 10001 trees were to be discarded as burn-in.
Results
Our phylogenetic analysis of seven Pocillopora species recovers two moderately-supported monophyletic groups of P.meandrina + P.verrucosa (P.damicornis type γ) and ‘Clade 1’, as defined by Schmidt-Roach et al. (2014a). The latter clade comprises the P.damicornis types α, β and δ, which correspond to the newly-delimited taxa P.damicornis, P.acuta and P.aliciae, respectively (Fig. 3).
The topology and statistical supports within this clade match those obtained by Schmidt-Roach et al. (2014a), with only the subclade of type α being highly supported. Types β and δ are only minimally supported by maximum likelihood inference and not supported by Bayesian analysis. Nevertheless, each of these sequence types are supported by nucleotide changes that are fixed within the clade. Type α sequences are distinguished from type β and type δ sequences based on six and four variable sites, respectively, while the latter two types are different at two sites across the 850-bp alignment. Therefore, sequencing errors aside, ORF sequences can help separate the three species effectively despite minimal phylogenetic supports.
Pocilloporaacuta Lamarck, 1816
Pocilloporaacuta Lamarck, 1816, p. 274; Schmidt-Roach et al. 2014a, p. 17; Schmidt-Roach et al. 2014b, p. 11; Kitano et al. 2015, p. 21; Mayfield et al. 2015, p. 1.
Materials examined. MNHN-IK-2010-792 (holotype, Muséum national d’Histoire naturelle de Paris, France; type locality: Indian Ocean); see Table 1 for voucher specimens (ZRC, LKCNHM).
Description. Colonial, densely caespitose (Fig. 1A, D, G, J, M); branches typically round in cross section, but may become flattened at the tips, which are usually sharply pointed. Branches of colonies in exposed sites thicken and have smaller spacing between branches (Fig. 2A–F), while those in sheltered sites are elongate and slender (Fig. 2G–L). Calices typically oval, with the small diameter ranging between 0.6 and 0.8 mm, and the large diameter between 1.0 and 1.2 mm. Columellae flat. Septa poorly developed, in two equal cycles; 12 septa per corallite (Fig. 1L, O). Coenosteum with fine spinules. Living colony pale-greenish in colour with characteristic darker pigmentation surrounding oral opening of polyps (Fig. 1C).
Remarks. Colonies collected from Singapore’s reefs show great variation in branching morphologies, overlapping with those described for Pocilloporaacuta and P.damicornis by Schmidt-Roach et al. (2014a). For instance, Pocilloporaacuta colonies observed from exposed environments in Singapore have considerably thicker branches (~6 mm) than those shown in Schmidt-Roach et al. (2014a). The pigmentation rings may not be clearly visible for all corallites in every colony; they vary from faint to intense brown. Nevertheless, sequences of the mitochondrial open reading frame from these colonies are all nested within the type-β clade that has been redefined as P.acuta (Schmidt-Roach et al. 2014a). The bootstrap support and posterior probability are low, but our sequences exactly match (100% identity) nearly all the published P.acuta sequences obtained from Australia and Japan (Fig. 3).
Discussion
This study contributes to the limited data that have emerged from the South China Sea region on the identity of Pocillopora species. The recently-revived species P.acuta is described to have a wide distribution reaching from the central Pacific to the Indian Ocean (Schmidt-Roach et al. 2014a). Our results show clearly the presence of Pocilloporaacuta in Singapore, one of the southernmost localities in the South China Sea. Here, it is found in nearly every offshore reef (Huang et al. 2009), and colonies are common in the shallows (0–4 m below chart datum) but generally do not exist beyond 6 m depth. They thrive in various types of habitats including on artificial substrates such as seawalls and pontoons (Toh et al. 2017), and serve as habitat for diverse ectosymbiont communities (Lee and Sin 2009). The species is hermaphroditic (Kerr et al. 2011) and has been documented to brood monthly in Singapore, just before or after the new moon (Chou and Quek 1993, Toh et al. 2013).
Although we find no contemporary evidence of P.damicornis on Singapore’s reefs, the variability of colony branch thickness among specimens from past collections held at the LKCNHM (Fig. 2) appears greater than those collected from the field for this study and overlaps with that of P.damicornis as defined by Schmidt-Roach et al. (2014a). Nevertheless, some specimens we sequenced as P.acuta here, which were collected from several environments spread across most of the reef localities in Singapore, also had thick branches and rounded tips (e.g. HD154; Fig. 1M, N) diagnostic of P.damicornis (Schmidt-Roach et al. 2014a). This wide morphological variation appears to be associated with wave and current exposure, with an increase in branch thickness going from sheltered sites to more exposed ones. It is also possible that the actual P.damicornis species had been present before but faced recent losses locally due to pressures from coastal development (Chou 2006, Huang et al. 2009). Hence, a regional investigation with genetic samples from less impacted reefs may help clarify the historical distributions of P.acuta and P.damicornis.
The taxonomy of South China Sea Pocillopora remains poorly understood. A previous study has shown that Pocillopora ‘damicornis-like’ types 4 and 5 are present in Taiwan, while the Gulf of Thailand only hosts the latter type (Pinzón et al. 2013). More recently, these genetic types 4 and 5 have been delimited as Pocilloporadamicornis (type α) and P.acuta (type β) respectively by Schmidt-Roach et al. (2013), Schmidt-Roach et al. (2014a). These findings were based on the mitochondrial ORF, the same marker we have sequenced here, thus underlining its utility as a reliable method of identifying the Pocillopora species present in Singapore.
Broadly, Pocilloporaacuta is present in both Taiwan and Gulf of Thailand, but P.damicornis appears to be limited to the northern South China Sea as it has thus far only been confirmed from Taiwan using the mitochondrial ORF. Further north at the Yaeyama Islands, Japan, P.damicornis is present but is likely rare relative to P.acuta (Kitano et al. 2015). Despite that, P.damicornis is the only Pocillopora species detected along mainland Japan to date (Pinzón et al. 2013). All these sequencing work, applied on a wide range of colony and corallite morphologies that overlap with both species (Figs 1, 2), suggests that P.damicornis is rare in the South China Sea and southern Japan.
Thus far ranging from the Central Pacific to the Indian Ocean through Singapore, Taiwan and Hawai’i, further sampling may reveal the presence of P.acuta in more localities in the Central Indo-Pacific. Overall, the emerging picture shows that most ‘damicornis-like’ corals in the southwestern South China Sea region are actually P.acuta instead of P.damicornis.
Acknowledgements
This study is funded by the National Research Foundation (Singapore) through the Marine Science R&D Programme (R-154-000-A25-281). We thank Bert Hoeksema and an anonymous reviewer for helping to improve the manuscript, and Chua Keng Soon (LKCNHM) for assistance with loans, imaging and cataloguing of specimens.
References1984Species concept and ecomorph variation in living and fossil Scleractinia547079http://archive.org/details/palaeontographic541984pale2006Marine habitats in one of the world’s busiest harboursSpringerThe Netherlands377-39110.1007/1-4020-3655-8_221993Planulation in the scleractinian coral Pocilloporadamicornis in Singapore waters15002012jModelTest 2: more models, new heuristics and parallel computing9810.1038/nmeth.21092006Molecular phylogeny and systematics of the scleractinian coral genus Pocillopora in Hawaii24292007The mitochondrial genome of Pocillopora (Cnidaria: Scleractinia) contains two variable regions: The putative D-loop and a novel ORF of unknown function401808710.1016/j.gene.2007.07.0062008Patterns of genetic structure among Hawaiian corals of the genus Pocillopora yield clusters of individuals that are compatible with morphology33123924710.1016/j.crvi.2007.12.0031977Patterns of small-scale variation of skeletal morphology within the scleractinian corals, Montastreaannularis and Siderastreasiderea2409415http://www.reefbase.org/resource_center/publication/pub_22034.aspx1983The relationship between corallite morphology and colony shape in some massive reef-corals2192510.1007/BF003047282003A simple, fast, and accurate algorithm to estimate large phylogenies by maximum likelihood52569670410.1080/106351503902355202009An inventory of zooxanthellate scleractinian corals in Singapore, including 33 new recordsSupplement 226980http://rmbr.nus.edu.sg/rbz/biblio/s22/s22rbz069-080.pdf2001MRBAYES: Bayesian inference of phylogenetic trees17875475510.1093/bioinformatics/17.8.7542013MAFFT multiple sequence alignment software version 7: improvements in performance and usability30477278010.1093/molbev/mst0102008Recent developments in the MAFFT multiple sequence alignment program9428629810.1093/bib/bbn0132002MAFFT: a novel method for rapid multiple sequence alignment based on fast Fourier transform30143059306610.1093/nar/gkf4362011Correlated evolution of sex and reproductive mode in corals (Anthozoa: Scleractinia)27817027581http://rspb.royalsocietypublishing.org/cgi/content/abstract/278/1702/7510.1098/rspb.2010.11962015Most Pocilloporadamicornis around Yaeyama Islands are Pocilloporaacuta according to mitochondrial ORF sequences171212210.3755/galaxea.17.212009Trapeziaseptata Dana, 1852 (Brachyura, Trapeziidae): a new record for Singapore with notes on its relationship with the host coral, Pocilloporaverrucosa821216031608http://www.jstor.org/stable/2069623510.1163/156854009X4638382004The role of taxonomy in species conservation359144471171910.1098/rstb.2003.14542016Mesquite: A Modular System for Evolutionary Analysis (Version 3.10)http://mesquiteproject.org2014Extreme phenotypic polymorphism in the coral genus Pocillopora; micro-morphology corresponds to mitochondrial groups, while colony morphology does not90121123110.5343/bms.2012.10802015A survey of pocilloporid corals and their endosymbiotic dinoflagellate communities in the Austral and Cook Islands of the South Pacific121172016Coral restoration in Singapore’s sediment-challenged sea842242910.1016/j.rsma.2016.05.0052013Blind to morphology: genetics identifies several widespread ecologically common species and few endemics among Indo-Pacific cauliflower corals (Pocillopora, Scleractinia)4015951608http://doi.wiley.com/10.1111/jbi.1211010.1111/jbi.121102008jModelTest: Phylogenetic model averaging2571253125610.1093/molbev/msn0832014Tracer: MCMC Trace Analysis Tool. Version 1.6http://beast.bio.ed.ac.uk/Tracer2003MrBayes 3: Bayesian phylogenetic inference under mixed models19121572157410.1093/bioinformatics/btg1802012MrBayes 3.2: Efficient Bayesian phylogenetic inference and model choice across a large model space613539542http://sysbio.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/doi/10.1093/sysbio/sys02910.1093/sysbio/sys0292014With eyes wide open: a revision of species within and closely related to the Pocilloporadamicornis species complex (Scleractinia; Pocilloporidae) using morphology and genetics1701133http://doi.wiley.com/10.1111/zoj.1209210.1111/zoj.120922014Daytime spawning of Pocillopora species in Kaneohe Bay, Hawai'i16111210.3755/galaxea.16.112012Broadcast spawning by Pocillopora species on the Great Barrier Reef712http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.005084710.1371/journal.pone.00508472013Assessing hidden species diversity in the coral Pocilloporadamicornis from Eastern Australia321161172http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00338-012-0959-z10.1007/s00338-012-0959-z2006RAxML-VI-HPC: Maximum likelihood-based phylogenetic analyses with thousands of taxa and mixed models22212688269010.1093/bioinformatics/btl4462014RAxML version 8: a tool for phylogenetic analysis and post-analysis of large phylogenies3091312131310.1093/bioinformatics/btu0332008A rapid bootstrap algorithm for the RAxML web servers57575877110.1080/106351508024296422004Genotype × environment interactions in transplanted clones of the massive corals Faviaspeciosa and Diploastreaheliopora27116718210.3354/meps2711672017Spatial variability of epibiotic assemblages on marina pontoons in Singapore2018319710.1007/s11252-016-0589-22013Heterotrophy in recruits of the scleractinian coral Pocilloporadamicornis465313320http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/10236244.2013.83289010.1080/10236244.2013.832890VeronJohn E N1995UNSW PressSydney320VeronJohn E N2000Australian Institute of Marine ScienceTownsville1381VeronJohn E NPichonMichel19761Australian Institute of Marine ScienceTownsville85http://archive.org/details/ScleractiniaEas00JENVB2004Taxonomic triage and the poverty of phylogeny359144457158310.1098/rstb.2003.145202B51460-8C88-5F8E-A153-F85E390F34D310.3897/BDJ.5.e11407.figure1917622
Pocillopora specimens examined in this study. In situ appearances (A: HD159, D: HD162, G: HD161, J: HD160, M: HD154), with corresponding images of bleached skeletons (B, E, H, K, N). C, live specimen showing brown ring surrounding each oral opening (image by Jenny). F, I, branches from colonies shown in D and G respectively. L, O, calices and septa from colonies shown in J and M respectively. Scale bars represent 1 cm (B, E, H, K, N) and 1 mm (F, I, L, O) respectively.
Pocillopora specimens previously identified as P.damicornis from the Zoological Reference Collection, Lee Kong Chian Natural History Museum, Singapore (A, B: ZRC.1980.20.133; C, D: ZRC.1991.766; E, F: ZRC.1987.1538; G, H: ZRC.1987.1995; I, J: ZRC.1991.763; K, L: ZRC.1987.1537). A–F, colonies with thick branches; G–L, colonies with thinner branches. Scale bars represent 1 cm.
Maximum likelihood tree of seven Pocillopora species based on the mitochondrial open reading frame. Colonies from Singapore are shown in red. Bootstrap values (≥ 50) and Bayesian posterior probabilities (≥ 0.85) are shown for supported clades.