Biodiversity Data Journal :
Data Paper (Biosciences)
|
Corresponding author: Cristina Ronquillo (cristinaronquillo@mncn.csic.es)
Academic editor: Vinicius S. Ferreira
Received: 25 Jan 2023 | Accepted: 18 Mar 2023 | Published: 23 Mar 2023
© 2023 Stephanie Vaz, Mariana Mendes, Gabriel Khattar, Margarete Macedo, Cristina Ronquillo, Alejandra Zarzo-Arias, Joaquín Hortal, Luiz Silveira
This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Citation:
Vaz S, Mendes M, Khattar G, Macedo M, Ronquillo C, Zarzo-Arias A, Hortal J, Silveira L (2023) Firefly (Coleoptera, Lampyridae) species from the Atlantic Forest hotspot, Brazil. Biodiversity Data Journal 11: e101000. https://doi.org/10.3897/BDJ.11.e101000
|
We compiled a database of firefly species records from the Atlantic Forest hotspot in Brazil and made it available at GBIF. Data were gathered from literature and from several key entomological collections, including: Coleção entomológica Prof. José Alfredo Pinheiro Dutra (DZRJ/UFRJ) and Coleção do Laboratório de Ecologia de Insetos from Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro (CLEI/UFRJ); Coleção Entomológica do Instituto Oswaldo Cruz (CEIOC); Museu de Zoologia da Universidade de São Paulo (MZSP); Coleção Entomológica Pe. Jesus Santiago Moure from Universidade Federal do Paraná (DZUP/UFPR); and Coleção Entomológica from Universidade Federal Rural de Pernambuco (UFRPE). This database represents the largest contribution to a public repository of recorded occurrences from Neotropical fireflies.
This dataset shows the occurrence and abundance of firefly species in the Atlantic Forest hotspot. Firefly species endemic to this biome are also present and considered in the study. These data can assist scientific and societal needs, by supporting future research projects and conservation decision-making.
Neotropics, dataset, species occurrences, endemism, rainforest, South America
The Atlantic Forest covers seventeen of twenty-six Brazilian States and occupies almost the whole country's coast (
Fireflies (Lampyridae) are amongst the many organisms threatened by anthropogenic stressors and climate change in the Atlantic Forest (
Besides their relevance, fireflies are very charismatic for society (
Even though anthropogenic threats have been investigated, the extent to which climate and land use changes impact fireflies has never been quantitatively assessed anywhere in South America. An important way to protect fireflies from these threats is to protect forest remnants at the Atlantic Forest hotspot, since protected areas act as a shelter for thousands of species. In this regard, mobilising the biodiversity data currently stored in natural history collections and literature can be particularly useful to conduct large-scale analyses in macroecology and conservation, provided that its coverage is adequately assessed and field inventories are conducted to fill in the gaps that are eventually identified (
Shortfalls, particularly in species identities and distribution (Linnean and Wallacean shortfalls, respectively, see
Keep the forest shiny: mapping threats to provide information for conservation planning of firefly species endemic to the Atlantic Forest hotspot
Stephanie Vaz, Mariana Mendes, Gabriel Khattar, Margarete Macedo, Cristina Ronquillo, Alejandra Zarzo-Arias, Joaquín Hortal, Luiz Felipe Silveira
Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior 88887.694716/2022-00
Information on lampyrid specimens included in this study was obtained from scientific collections, literature and unpublished data from fieldwork research over nine years throughout the Brazilian Atlantic Forest. The samples were evaluated from different areas in the Brazilian coast, mainly from the south-eastern and south regions (Fig.
Scientific collections
Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro - Coleção entomológica Prof. José Alfredo Pinheiro Dutra from Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro (DZRJ), Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro - Coleção do Laboratório de Ecologia de Insetos from Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro (CLEI), Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Fiocruz/CEIOC - Coleção Entomológica do Instituto Oswaldo Cruz, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Universidade Federal do Parana - Coleção Entomológica Pe. Jesus Santiago Moure from Universidade Federal do Paraná (DZUP/UFPR), Paraná, Brazil.
Museu de Zoologia da Universidade de Sao Paulo (MZUSP), São Paulo, Brazil.
Universidade Federal Rural de Pernambuco - Coleção entomológica da Universidade Federal Rural de Pernambuco (UFRPE), Pernambuco, Brazil.
Firefly species were analysed under a stereomicroscope and we imaged characters relevant to species identification. All of them were compared to the species-type material and original descriptions, when available. For specimens whose identity could not be confirmed at the species level, we included a morphotype code (“sp1”, “sp2” and so on). This code was standardised by the first author, so all specimens with the same code in the database pertain to the same morphotype. Entomological institutions and their collections are discriminated as provided by GBIF. Museu Nacional/UFRJ institution code holds both Coleção entomológica Prof. José Alfredo Pinheiro Dutra from Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro (DZRJ) and Coleção do Laboratório de Ecologia de Insetos from Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro (CLEI) collection codes in this paper.
Fieldwork
The surveys at Parque Nacional da Serra dos Órgãos, Parque Nacional da Tijuca, Parque Estadual da Pedra Branca and Parque Estadual da Ilha Grande were conducted following the same protocol. We used Malaise traps (Fig.
Literature
Most of the data incorporated into this dataset came from our team, which includes two leading lampyrid taxonomists: Stephanie Vaz and Luiz Silveira. Together, SV and LS have been studying and collecting fireflies since 2010 and helped to build one of the most comprehensive and well-curated firefly collections in the Americas. This work includes: (i) the original descriptions of many of the endemic species covered in this dataset and (ii) monographic reviews which confirmed the endemism (to the Atlantic Forest) of several other species. Data were taken from the original source (
All records were validated geographically and taxonomically. Coordinates were plotted and revised to verify the geographical location and locality. All scientific names were checked for types and matched to the species information.
Most specimens deposited in collections were preserved in entomological drawers under dry conditions. The information contained on the specimens’ labels was collected to build the dataset. Specimens from our fieldwork are preserved in ethanol > 90% since the date of collection (Fig.
The samples were collected from different areas throughout the Brazilian Atlantic Forest (Fig.
-29.78 and -4.11 Latitude; -54.95 and -34.88 Longitude.
The dataset consists in 3010 records, 36 genera and 107 different species. Additionally, there are 362 records with genus taxonomic status comprising 44 morphotypes which could not be identified at species level with 100% certainty. That means 153 potential species in this dataset representing 7.65% of the species recorded worldwide (see Branham (2010)), although it is necessary to bear in mind that the total number of Lampyridae species worldwide is still underestimated (
The most frequently reported species was Photuris femoralis Curtis, 1839, which was recovered from 377 locations. Photinus frater (Olivier, 1905) was the second most abundant, found at 334 locations, followed by Lucidota flabellicornis Fabricius, 1781 (122), Amydetes apicalis Germar, 1824 (104) and Photinus luna Curtis, 1932 (101).
The five most abundant species were from the subfamily Photurinae and Lampyrinae. The full firefly dataset was recorded from 14 ecoregions in the Atlantic Forest.
1885–2019
The dataset in the current work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) 4.0 License.
The dataset contains information on fireflies (Coleoptera, Lampyridae) from the Brazilian Atlantic Forest, obtained from our own fieldwork, specimens deposited in scientific collections and data available in literature. The aims and objectives of this project are to build and compile a dataset tailored to: (i) evaluate the coverage and eventual biases of the distributional data available for Atlantic Forest fireflies; and (ii) develop models to provide further insights on how light pollution, land-use and climate changes may affect the firefly species endemic to the Atlantic Forest. The specimens have been lumped into a single dataset, forming the basis of S. Vaz 's PhD thesis. This dataset will be used to investigate priority areas for conservation in the Atlantic Forest and assess the connection amongst firefly populations and communities located in different forest fragments. This dataset is published in GBIF under the licence CC BY 4.0 and the metadata can be also consulted at
Column label | Column description |
---|---|
datasetName | The name identifying the dataset from which the record was derived. |
occurrenceID | An identifier for the Occurrence (as opposed to a particular digital record of the occurrence). In the absence of a persistent global unique identifier, construct one from a combination of identifiers in the record that will most closely make the occurrenceID globally unique. |
basisOfRecord | The specific nature of the data record. |
eventDate | The date-time or interval during which an Event occurred. For occurrences, this is the date-time when the event was recorded. Not suitable for a time in a geological context. |
year | The four-digit year in which the Event occurred, according to the Common Era Calendar. |
month | The integer month in which the Event occurred. |
day | The integer day of the month on which the Event occurred. |
scientificName | The full scientific name, with authorship and date information, if known. When forming part of an Identification, this should be the name in lowest level taxonomic rank that can be determined. |
higherClassification | A list (concatenated and separated) of taxa names terminating at the rank immediately superior to the taxon referenced in the taxon record. |
kingdom | The full scientific name of the kingdom in which the taxon is classified. |
phylum | The full scientific name of the phylum or division in which the taxon is classified. |
class | The full scientific name of the class in which the taxon is classified. |
order | The full scientific name of the order in which the taxon is classified. |
family | The full scientific name of the family in which the taxon is classified. |
genus | The full scientific name of the genus in which the taxon is classified. |
specificEpithet | The name of the first or species epithet of the scientificName. |
taxonRank | The taxonomic rank of the most specific name in the scientificName. |
identificationRemarks | Comments or notes about the Identification. |
identifiedBy | A list (concatenated and separated) of names of people, groups or organisations who assigned the Taxon to the subject. |
decimalLatitude | The geographic latitude (in decimal degrees, using the spatial reference system given in geodeticDatum) of the geographic centre of a Location. Positive values are north of the Equator, negative values are south of it. Legal values lie between -90 and 90, inclusive. |
decimalLongitude | The geographic longitude (in decimal degrees, using the spatial reference system given in geodeticDatum) of the geographic centre of a Location. Positive values are east of the Greenwich Meridian, negative values are west of it. Legal values lie between -180 and 180, inclusive. |
geodeticDatum | The ellipsoid, geodetic datum or spatial reference system (SRS), upon which the geographic coordinates given in decimalLatitude and decimalLongitude are based. |
georeferencedBy | A list (concatenated and separated) of names of people, groups or organisations who determined the georeference (spatial representation) for the Location. |
georeferenceProtocol | A description or reference to the methods used to determine the spatial footprint, coordinates and uncertainties. |
continent | The name of the continent in which the Location occurs. |
country | The name of the country or major administrative unit in which the Location occurs. |
countryCode | The standard code for the country in which the Location occurs. |
stateProvince | The name of the next smaller administrative region than country (state, province, canton, department, region etc.) in which the Location occurs. |
county | The full, unabbreviated name of the next smaller administrative region than stateProvince (county, shire, department etc.) in which the Location occurs. |
locality | Less specific geographic information can be provided in other geographic terms (higherGeography, continent, country, stateProvince, county, municipality, waterBody, island, islandGroup). This term may contain information modified from the original to correct perceived errors or standardise the description. |
associatedReferences | A list (concatenated and separated) of identifiers (publication, bibliographic reference, global unique identifier, URI) of literature associated with the Occurrence. |
institutionCode | The name (or acronym) in use by the institution having custody of the object(s) or information referred to in the record. |
collectionCode | The name, acronym, coden or initialism identifying the collection or dataset from which the record was derived. |
recordedBy | A list (concatenated and separated) of names of people, groups or organisations responsible for recording the original Occurrence. The primary collector or observer, especially one who applies a personal identifier (recordNumber), should be listed first. |
Permission to undertake research in the protected areas mentioned in this paper was granted by the Instituto Chico Mendes de Conservação da Biodiversidade, Ministério do Meio Ambiente, Brazil. We also thank the staff at Parque Estadual da Pedra Branca and our dear friend André Luiz Diniz Ferreira (PEPB). We thank the staff at the Parque Nacional da Serra dos Órgãos and Reserva Ecológica de Guapiaçu for supporting our fieldwork and the staff at Laboratório de Ecologia de Insetos/UFRJ and Laboratório de Entomologia/UFRJ for field assistance. We thank all the curators of DZRJ, DZUP, MZSP, CLEI, UFRPE and CEIOC, for their support during our visits to their respective institutions and Programa de Pós-Graduação em Ecologia for supporting the visitation to the collections. We would like to thank SIBBr for supporting our dataset and to provide precious technical information to provide the firefly assessments online. S.V. was financed in part by the Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior – Brasil (CAPES). We acknowledge support of the publication fee by the CSIC Open Access Publication Support Initiative through its Unit of Information Resources for Research (URICI).
SV and MMendes collected, counted specimens, compiled data and wrote the manuscript. GK collected data, CR curation and validation of data and support for submission to GBIF. SV and LS identified and collected specimens. M Macedo supported the fieldwork in Parque Nacional da Serra dos Órgãos and provided lab equipment/technology material for the Lampyridae collection and maintenance and edited the manuscript. AZA and JH helped with data design and management. SV, GK and LS provided specimen data. SV led the writing. All authors edited and approved the manuscript.
How to collect fireflies by using a Malaise trap.