|
Biodiversity Data Journal :
Taxonomy & Inventories
|
|
Corresponding author: Andrei Bogdan Terec (andrei.terec@ubbcluj.ro)
Academic editor: Pavel Starkevic
Received: 21 Mar 2023 | Accepted: 12 Jun 2023 | Published: 03 Jul 2023
© 2023 Youness Mabrouki, Andrei Terec, Fouzi Taybi, Anna Dénes, Lujza Keresztes
This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Citation:
Mabrouki Y, Terec AB, Taybi FA, Dénes A, Keresztes L (2023) Taxonomic notes and key to the West Palearctic Antocha (Antocha) Osten Sacken, 1860 (Diptera, Limoniidae) with description of a new species from Morocco. Biodiversity Data Journal 11: e103849. https://doi.org/10.3897/BDJ.11.e103849
|
|
The Mediterranean Region of the West Palearctic is one of the most species-rich biomes in the world, hosting a high level of endemism and relict species with important conservation value. The North Africa Atlas Mountains (spanning Morocco, Algeria and Tunisia) belong to a poorly-investigated region of the Mediterranean area, with overlooked aquatic biodiversity; hence, a number of species still remain to be discovered.
The subgenus Antocha (Antocha) Osten Sacken, 1860 is recorded for the first time from Africa, with a description of A. (A.) staryi Keresztes & Mabrouki sp. nov. from hilly regions of the Middle Atlas region, Morocco. The unique design of the male terminalia differentiates well the newly-discovered species from its closely-related and range-restricted A. (A.) phoenicia Thomas and Dia, 1982. This is in contrast with the high intraspecific and geographically poorly-defined variability of the widespread A. (A.) vitripennis (Meigen, 1830), for which morphological variability of male genital structures is discussed.
Illustrations of male genital parts, distribution data and key to the species from the West Palearctic area are also provided.
Antocha (Antocha), conservation, freshwater ecosystems, Mediterranean area, new species, the Middle Atlas region
The Mediterranean area is one of the world’s outstanding biodiversity hotspots with high conservation value within the West Palearctic (
Antocha Osten Sacken, 1860 is a relatively large genus of the subfamily Limoniinae (Diptera, Limoniidae), including 161 species according to
The subgenus Antocha contains small to medium-sized dipterans with body length ranging between 2.8 and 5.0 mm, up to 8.0 mm (
Larvae are aquatic, apneustic, developing in the riffles, gravel or detritus of fast running streams and rivers (
Material included in this study represent 201 male individuals of the subgenus A. (A.), including the new species. Adult specimens were collected between 2001 and 2022 using entomological nets and light traps, with a large amount of material collected by entomologists from different parts of the West Palearctic Region (Fig.
Male. Colour dark brown. Body length 5.3‒5.5 mm, wing length 6.2‒6.5 mm. General appearance as in Fig.
Antocha (Antocha) staryi sp. nov. a male habitus, lateral view; b antenna; c thorax, dorsal view; d femur and part of tibiae, third left leg; e right wing; f tip of the right wing; g stigma on the right wing; h male hypopygium, dorsal view; i tergite 9, dorsal view; j aedeagal complex, dorsal view; k aedeagal complex, lateral view; l female terminalia, lateral view.
Head. Dark brown, with light brown rostrum. Palpus greyish-brown. Antennae brownish, with 16 segments (Fig.
Thorax. Prescutum with anterolateral region yellowish. Prescutum and presutural scutum with a broad brown median and two broad lateral bands (Fig.
Abdomen. Dark brown, first segment lighter, with whitish-clouded tint dorsally, the last segments darker.
Male terminalia. Tergite 9 in the shape of transverse plate with posterior margin straight (Fig.
Female. Colour similar to males. Body length 5.8 mm, wing length 6.7 mm. General habitus similar to males, except the dark brown triangle on metathorax reduced.
Ovipositor. Cerci and hypogynal valve long and slender (Fig.
Antocha (A.) staryi sp. nov. can be recognised by dark brown body colouration, thoracic dark brown triangle, strongly sclerotised and curved outer gonostylus and tergite 9 having straight posterior margin and darkened, nearly triangular posterolateral lobes. Aedeagal complex with inner branch of parameres long, parameres apically forming slightly curved lobes.
The closest regional ally is A. (A.) phoenicia. Both species are similar in general features with A. (A.) vitripennis and are characterised by the long inner branch of the paramere, similar shape of parameral lobe and tergite 9 possessing extended posterolateral lobe. Still A. (A.) staryi sp. nov. can be separated from A. (A.) phoenicia by the unique apical part of the paramere (the parameral lobe) which is sharply narrowed to the distal end, longer and curved ventrally and also by details of tergite 9, with the posterior margin having a prominent and angular middle region in A. (A.) phoenicia, but less prominent, more or less straight in A. (A.) staryi sp. nov., but with posterolateral angle well developed, nearly triangular.
Antocha (A.) staryi sp. nov. is highly divergent from the European widespread A. (A.) vitripennis, as well as, in a series of morphological details in male genital structures, like the more or less straight posterior margin of tergite 9, but more sinuous in A. (A.) vitripennis, with a middle depression and two lateral humps. The exteriorly curved interbase lobe is well developed in A. (A.) staryi sp. nov., but less in A. (A.) vitripennis. Inner branch of the parameres parallel with aedeagus in A. (A.) staryi sp. nov., but highly divergent and sinuous in A. (A.) vitripennis. The apical part of the paramere with narrow and distally pointed parameral lobe in A. (A.) staryi sp. nov., but with a generally rounded lobe in A. (A.) vitripennis.
Named after the outstanding cranefly taxonomist Jaroslav Starý, honouring his 80th birth anniversary. A noun in genitive singular.
The type locality of the new species, Bakrit, belongs to the Middle Atlas Range, which is located in the southwest to northeast of the Mediterranean part of Morocco. The scientific and socio-economic interests of the included aquatic ecosystems are no longer demonstrated as an area with rich and varied natural resources, which generally support the presence of an interesting aquatic biodiversity with high rates of endemism (
The species was discovered in a single site in Morocco; therefore, we consider a range-restricted micro-endemic species of the Middle Atlas Range. Specimens were captured in Bakrit, a location in the Middle Atlas Range, a mountain range stretching over some 350 km, from southwest to northeast of the Mediterranean part of Morocco, located between the Rif Mountains and the High Atlas Mountains and covering a total area of 2.3 million hectares, i.e. 18% of Morocco’s high altitude mountain domain (Fig.
Bakrit Region is well-known for its rich superficial water resources, i.e. streams, waterfalls and springs and the new species was captured from the banks of a fast-flowing stream, with the type locality belonging to the Oum Errabiâ River Basin (Fig.
Different aquatic invertebrate species can be found in the habitat of A. (A.) staryi sp. nov. including the recently-described caddisfly Tinodes atlasensis Ibrahimi, Mabrouki & Taybi, 2021 and freshwater gastropod Pseudamnicola bouhaddiouii Taybi, Glöer & Mabrouki, 2022, in addition to other invertebrate species, such as Hydropsyche sp. (Trichoptera); Ecdyonurus rothschildi (Navàs, 1929), Rhithrogena sp., Baetis sp., Caenis sp. (Ephemeroptera); Calopteryx haemorrhoidalis (Vander Linden, 1825), Anax sp., Onychogomphus sp., Sympetrum sp., Orthetrum sp. (Odonata); Hydrometra stagnorum (Linnaeus, 1758) (Heteroptera); Atyaephyra desmarestii (Millet, 1831) (Decapoda); Physella acuta (Draparnaud, 1805), Ancylus fluviatilis O.F. Müller, 1774; Theodoxus sp., Melanopsis sp. (Mollusca); Simulium sp., Prosimulium sp. (Diptera) (
Limnobia vitripennis (Meigen, 1830) (type locality not given, ? near Stolberg, Germany
Synonyms: Antocha obscura Strobl, 1906 (as variety of A. opalizans, type-locality Ronda, Spain), Antocha fulvescens Lackschewitz, 1940 (type locality Vernet-les-Bains, France,
Morphological variability of male terminalia of A. (A.) vitripennis (Meigen, 1830) in the West Palearctic Region
A number of 198 male individuals of A. vitripennis were investigated from the whole West Palearctic Region, representing 20 different populations from Albania, Austria, Bulgaria, Croatia, Georgia, Germany, Greece, Montenegro, Romania and Spain (Table
Sampling sites of Antocha (Antocha) vitripennis from the West Palaearctic Region, included in this study, with number on individual males, localities, coordinates, altitude and name of the collectors. Morpho-types abbreviation sorted by country: AV-TYPE 1 – A. (A.) vitripennis, type 1; AV-TYPE 2 – A. (A.) vitripennis, type 2; AV-TYPE 3 – A. (A.) vitripennis, type 3; AV-TYPE 4 – A. (A.) vitripennis, type 4.
|
Species/Type |
Male |
Country |
Region |
Longitude | Latitude |
Data |
Collectors |
|
Av - type 1 |
25 |
Austria |
Burgenland |
47.373709°N |
16.010401°E |
19.06.2012 |
Graf, W. |
|
Av - type 1 |
5 |
Austria |
Wienna hills |
48.136847°N |
16.098223°E |
15.06.2012 |
Graf, W. |
|
Av - type 1 |
4 |
Bulgaria |
Stara Planina |
42.784125°N |
25.912326°E |
01.06.2013 |
Kolcsár, L- P, Török, E. |
|
Av - type 1 |
7 |
Croatia |
NP Plitvicka Jezera |
44.925833°N |
15.619167°E |
30.06.2008 |
Ivkovic, M. |
|
Av - type 1 |
6 |
Croatia |
Omiši Forests |
43.437297°N |
16.757657°E |
19.07.2005 |
Ivkovic, M. |
|
Av - type 1 |
2 |
Germany |
Danube lowland |
49.026846°N |
12.075860°E |
13.07.2013 |
Graf, W. |
|
Av - type 1 |
22 |
Romania |
Rodnei Mts. |
47.423995°N |
24.548807°E |
26.07.2003 |
Keresztes, L. |
|
Av - type 1 |
33 |
Romania |
Harghita Mts. |
46.412488°N |
25.745437°E |
15.07.2001 |
Keresztes, L. |
|
Av - type 1 |
37 |
Romania |
Ciucaș Mts. |
45.534297°N |
25.836821°E |
21.07.2004 |
Keresztes, L. |
|
Av - type 1 |
7 |
Romania |
Trascaului Mts. |
46.565262°N |
23.675828°E |
06.06.2001 |
Keresztes, L. |
|
Av - type 1 |
8 |
Romania |
Clujului Hills |
46.755529°N |
23.509461°E |
24.08.2004 |
Keresztes, L. |
|
Av - type 1 |
1 |
Spain |
Serrania de Cuenca |
39.503257°N |
(-)1.900691°E |
04.08.2009 |
Martinez, J. |
|
Av - type 2 |
1 |
Albania |
Korce |
41.016258°N |
20.513618°E |
03.05.2019 |
Keresztes, L. |
|
Av - type 2 |
12 |
Germany |
Eifel hills |
49.755204°N |
6.735459°E |
05.08.2007 |
Neu, P. |
|
Av - type 2 |
6 |
Romania |
Cerna Mts. |
45.256819°N |
22.814289°E |
10.08.2004 |
Bálint, M. |
|
Av - type 3 |
2 |
Bulgaria |
Pirin Mts. |
41.768952°N |
23.426897°E |
19.08.2003 |
Pauls, S. |
|
Av - type 3 |
1 |
Greece |
Olympus Mts. |
40.079097°N |
22.373471°E |
14.07.2012 |
Rákosy, L. |
|
Av - type 4 |
13 |
Albania |
Domosdova Plain |
41.075075°N |
20.498387°E |
01.05.2019 |
Keresztes, L. |
|
Av - type 4 |
1 |
Georgia |
North Caucaus |
43.122052°N |
42.750700°E |
18.07.2012 |
Graf, W. |
|
Av - type 4 |
5 |
Montenegro |
Prokletje Mts. |
42.550042°N |
19.825639°E |
02.05.2022 |
Dénes, A. |
Variability of the distal end of the outer gonostylus of the male genital structures of Antocha (Antocha) vitripennis from the West Palearctic area: a male terminalia, dorsal (Regensburg, Germany); b gonocoxite with outer gonostylus of type 1 (Germany); c type 1, aedeagus with parallel inner branch of parameres (Germany); d type 1, aedeagus with divergent inner branch of parameres (Austria); e gonocoxite with outer gonostylus of type 2 (Germany, Kassel); f gonocoxite with outer gonostylus of type 3 (Greece, Olympus); g gonocoxite with outer gonostylus of type 4 (Montenegro, Prokletje Mountains); h gonocoxite with outer gonostylus, special case of type 2 (Albania, Korce).
Type 1 corresponds to the “normal” shape of the inner gonostylus, according to
Our data show that type 1 of the inner gonostylus is widespread also in the central and eastern parts of Europe and it was detected in the hilly regions from Germany, Spain, Austria, Croatia, Romania and also in the Balkan Range Mountains (Stara Planina), Bulgaria. Out of the 201 male individuals, 157 specimens belong to this type, also representing the majority of male individuals investigated by us (roughly 78%).
Type 2, distinct from type 1, has a bifurcated outer gonostylus tip. The upper arm is shorter, always wider, more or less rounded or triangular, while the lower point is narrower, longer and almost thorn-like (Fig.
Type 3 represents individuals with outer gonostlylus ending in two points, similar to type 2, but the upper extension of the distal end is well developed, rounded and hump-like, while the lower part is more pointed and thorn-like (Fig.
Type 4 corresponds with the outer gonostylus sharply curved inwards and rounded at the distal end. A more or less well-developed tooth-like extension can often be distinguished in its lower corner (Fig.
|
Key to West Palearctic males of Antocha (Antocha) |
||
| 1 | Wing without a pronounced anal lobe | Antocha (Orimargula) |
| – | Wing with a pronounced anal lobe | 2 |
| 2 | Inner branch of parameres wide, with 2 teeth-like points at distal end | A. (A.) libanotica |
| – | Inner branch of parameres slender and simple ending with one point at distal end | 3 |
| 3 | Outer gonostylus gradually narrowed at distal end, ending in one or two distinct points, slightly curved downwards, inner branch of parameres slender and sinuous, sometimes parallel with the aedeagal axis | A. (A.) vitripennis |
| – | Outer gonostylus sharply curved down at distal end, rounded, inner branch of parameres straight and parallel with the aedeagal axis | 4 |
| 4 | Parameral lobes weakly developed | A. (A.) hirtipes |
| – | Parameral lobes well developed | 5 |
| 5 | Parameral lobes wide at base, divergent distally | A. (A.) phoenicia |
| – | Parameral lobes narrow at base, parallel distally with aeadeagal axis | A. (A.) staryi sp. nov. |
Antocha (A.) vitripennis has a long-debated taxonomy. The species was first described from the northern part of Germany (most probably around Stolberg) by
The species is widely distributed in the whole West Palearctic area (
Antocha (A.) fulvescens Lackschewitz, 1940, very close to A. (A.) vitripennis, was described by
Our result supports the work of
In conclusion, the subgenus Antocha is represented by five species in the West Palearctic area. Except for the high mountainous Antocha (A.) libanotica, which has a highly different shape of inner branch of parameres, ending in two points, the rest of the West Palearctic species, A. (A.) hirtipes, A. (A.) phoenicia and A. (A.) vitripennis, including the recently discovered A. (A.) staryi sp. nov., are mostly hilly species, highly similar in general habitus and shape of the male and female terminalia. The taxonomic status of type 3 of A. (A.) vitripennis remains challenged and this particular morphology of the outer gonostylus was detected in some few individuals only, collected at higher elevations in the Pirin Mountains, Bulgaria and Olympus Mountains, Greece. Further, morphological investigation supported by molecular data is highly recommended to test the taxonomic status of this particular morphology, as well as for the other members of the subgenus Antocha.
Despite the extremely high morphological variability of the male outer gonostylus in the case of A. (A.) vitripennis, a series of small, but constant details on other male genital structures, including the parameres and aedeagus, allow us to separate the five species of the subgenus A. (Antocha), supported also by information from literature (
The present work received financial support from a national grant offered by the Executive Unit for Financing Higher Education, Research, Development and Innovation, UEFSCDI, of the Romanian Ministry of Education and Research, PN-III-P2-2.1-PED-2019-0214; nr. 476PED/2020. Special thanks go to the collectors, who sent the material they collected for our examinations, namely (in alphabetical order): Bálint Miklós, Dénes Anna, Wolfram Graf, Maria Ivkovic, Kolcsár Levente Péter, Jesus Martinez, Peter Neu, Steffen Pauls, Rákosy László and Török Edina. We thank Matthew Copley for linguistic revisions and comments. Our thanks go to Driss Meziane for involvement in some of the Bekrit region photographs. The authors are also grateful to the reviewers, whose insightful comments helped to improve the quality of this paper.