Biodiversity Data Journal :
Taxonomy & Inventories
|
Corresponding author: Yejie Lin (linyejie15@gmail.com)
Academic editor: Yanfeng Tong
Received: 28 Apr 2023 | Accepted: 30 May 2023 | Published: 02 Jun 2023
© 2023 Fengyuan Li, Yejie Lin, Shuqiang Li
This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Citation:
Li F, Lin Y, Li S (2023) Notes on two Stiphropus species from China (Araneae, Thomisidae). Biodiversity Data Journal 11: e105695. https://doi.org/10.3897/BDJ.11.e105695
|
The spider genus Stiphropus Gerstaecker, 1873 currently includes 21 extant species that are distributed in Africa (12) and Asia (9). Four species, S. falciformus Yang, Zhu & Song, 2006, S. myrmecophilus Huang & Lin, 2020, S. ocellatus Thorell, 1887 and S. soureni Sen, 1964, are currently known from China.
The mismatched female of S. falciformus is reported as a new species: S. qianlei sp. n. (♂♀). The unknown male of S. soureni Sen, 1964 is described for the first time. Photos and morphological descriptions are provided.
diagnosis, new species, misidentification, taxonomic, myrmecophilous
The crab spider family Thomisidae Sundevall, 1833 contains 171 genera and 2172 known species worldwide (
Stiphropus currently comprises 21 species, distributed in Asia and Africa. Recently, a large number of new spider species have been reported from China (
During the examination of Stiphropus specimens from China (Guizhou, Tibet and Yunnan), we found the undescribed male of S. soureni Sen, 1964 from Tibet and determined that the supposed female of S. falciformus Yang, Zhu & Song, 2006 described from Guizhou is mismatched and, in actuality, constitutes a new species: S. qianlei sp. n. is the new species and is closely allied with the ant species Aphaenogaster smythiesii (Forel, 1902). The goal of this paper is to provide description of this new species and the undescribed female of S. soureni.
All specimens were preserved in 80% ethanol. The spermathecae were cleared in trypsin enzyme solution to dissolve non-chitinous tissues. Specimens were examined under a Leica M205C stereomicroscope. Photomicrographs were taken with an Olympus C7070 zoom digital camera (7.1 megapixels). Laboratory habitus photographs were taken with a Sony A7RIV digital camera, equipped with a Sony FE 90mm Goss lens. Photos were stacked with Helicon Focus® (Version 7.6.1) or Zerene Stacker® (Version 1.04) and processed in Adobe Photoshop CC2022®. The distribution map was generated with ArcGIS v. 10.2 (ESRI Inc.).
All measurements are in millimetres (mm) and were obtained with an Olympus SZX16 stereomicroscope with a Zongyuan CCD industrial camera. All measurements of body lengths do not include the chelicerae. Eye sizes are measured as the maximum diameter from either the dorsal or frontal view. Leg measurements are given as follows: total length (femur, patella, tibia, metatarsus, tarsus). The type materials are deposited in the Institute of Zoology, Chinese Academy of Sciences in Beijing (IZCAS).
Abbreviations: AG accessory gland; ALE anterior lateral eye; AME anterior median eye; CD copulatory duct; CO copulatory opening; DTA dorsal tibial apophysis; E embolus; FD fertilisation duct; PLE posterior lateral eye; PME posterior median eye; S spermatheca; Tu tutaculum; VTA ventral tibial apophysis.
Male (holotype). Total length 2.71; carapace 1.29 long, 1.12 wide, opisthosoma 1.55 long, 1.16 wide. Eye sizes and interdistances: AME 0.06, ALE 0.11, PME 0.02, PLE 0.09, AME–AME 0.07, AME–ALE 0.17, PME–PME 0.17, PME–PLE 0.26, AME–PME 0.07, ALE–PLE 0.13. Chelicerae with seven promarginal spines. Endites 3 times longer than wide. Leg measurements: I 3.13 (0.86, 0.56, 0.92, 0.79), II 3.12 (0.84, 0.92, 0.54, 0.82), III 2.29 (0.68, 0.79, 0.34, 0.48), IV 2.38 (0.71, 0.81, 0.37, 0.49).
Colouration (Fig.
Palp (Fig.
Female (IZCAS-Ar44581). Total length 4.57; carapace 1.80 long, 1.45 wide, opisthosoma 2.64 long, 2.49 wide. Eye sizes and interdistances: AME 0.07, ALE 0.13, PME 0.02, PLE 0.13, AME–AME 0.09, AME–ALE 0.21, PME–PME 0.23, PME–PLE 0.34, AME–PME 0.13, ALE–PLE 0.16. Chelicerae with seven promarginal spines. Endites 3 times longer than wide. Leg measurements: I 3.73 (0.99, 1.07, 0.60, 1.07), II 3.85 (1.05, 1.14, 0.60, 1.06), III 3.06 (0.92, 1.06, 0.42, 0.66), IV 3.33 (1.02, 1.11, 0.53, 0.67).
Colouration (Fig.
Epigyne (Fig.
The male is similar to S. ocellatus Thorell, 1887 by the curved and wide embolus and long, terminal sharp dorsal tibial apophysis (see
The species is named after one of the collectors.
All specimens were collected in two different nests of Aphaenogaster smythiesii (Forel, 1902). S. qianlei sp. n. can be classified as a myrmecophile or myrmecophage. The collectors did not search for S. qianlei sp. n. outside the ant nests, but evidence suggests that the discovery of S. qianlei sp. n. in ant nests is typical (Fig.
The oval fan-shaped folds, the 90° folded copulatory duct and accessory gland point posteriorly show the females of S. falciformus in
Stiphropus falciformus 1♂, CHINA: Yunnan: Xishuangbanna, Mengla County, Menglun Town, Menglun Nature Reserve, Guo Zheng leg.
Male. Total length 3.43; carapace 1.59 long, 1.44 wide, opisthosoma 1.80 long, 1.85 wide. Eye sizes and interdistances: AME 0.05, ALE 0.07, PME 0.02, PLE 0.06, AME–AME 0.05, AME–ALE 0.11, PME–PME 0.13, PME–PLE 0.18, AME–PME 0.06, ALE–PLE 0.08. Chelicerae with seven promarginal spines. Endites 3 times longer than wide. Leg measurements: I 3.41 (0.84, 1.09, 0.58, 0.90), II 3.53 (0.92, 1.15, 0.59, 0.87), III 2.71 (0.79, 0.95, 0.44, 0.53), IV 2.71 (0.87, 0.87, 0.44, 0.53).
Colouration (Fig.
Palp (Fig.
Female. See
The male is similar to that of S. ocellatus Thorell, 1887 by the curved embolus, terminal sharp and long, strong dorsal tibial apophysis (See
China (Tibet) (Fig.
This species live under the bark of trees.
The male is described here for the first time.
Danni Sherwood (UK) checked English. Yanbin Yao (Fujian, China) helped examine Stiphropus falciformus. Hao Yu (Guizhou, China), Qianle Lu (Guangdong, China) and Zhuo Chen (Beijing, China) helped in fieldwork. Qianle Lu (Guangdong, China) helped with photographs. Fengyuan Li was supported in part by the Postdoctoral Fellowship of Peking-Tsinghua Center for Life Sciences.