Biodiversity Data Journal :
Research Article
|
Corresponding author: Xiaohua Dai (xiaohuadai@gnnu.edu.cn)
Academic editor: Marianna Simões
Received: 05 Jun 2023 | Accepted: 22 Jul 2023 | Published: 31 Jul 2023
© 2023 Chaokun Yang, Chengqing Liao, Jiasheng Xu, Peng Liu, Charles L. Staines, Xiaohua Dai
This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Citation:
Yang C, Liao C, Xu J, Liu P, Staines CL, Dai X (2023) Field survey of Cassidinae beetles (Coleoptera, Chrysomelidae) and their host plants in southern Guangxi, China. Biodiversity Data Journal 11: e107523. https://doi.org/10.3897/BDJ.11.e107523
|
Few systematic studies have been conducted on the faunal composition and food web structure of Cassidinae of China. During 2013-2019, we systematically investigated Cassidinae beetles and their host plants in the southern Guangxi. A total of 2,255 Cassidinae individuals from 66 species, 23 genera and ten tribes were collected in southern Guangxi. Most species belonged to the tribe Hispini (23 species, 34.8%), followed by the tribe Gonophorini (13 species, 19.7%), Cassidini (eight species, 12.1%) and Aspidimorphini (six species, 9.1%). The others (16 species) belonged to the tribes Anisoderini, Botryonopini, Callispini, Oncocephalini, Notosacanthini and Leptispini. The tribe Notosacanthini was recorded from Guangxi for the first time. The genera Neownesia (Botryonopini), Gonophora (Gonophorini), Micrispa (Gonophorini), Notosacantha (Notosacanthini) and Prionispa (Oncocephalini) were firstly recorded in Guangxi. In total, we obtained 47 newly-recorded species in southern Guangxi and 33 newly-recorded species in the whole Guangxi, of which, Callispa frontalis Medvedev, 1992 was newly recorded in China. Dactylispa feae Gestro (625 individuals) and D. chinensis Weise (565 individuals) were the most common species. A total of 69 species, 53 genera and 19 families of host plants were identified for Cassidinae in southern Guangxi. Many host plant associations are new records for Cassidinae. Quantitative food web analysis indicated that Cassidinae species in southern Guangxi primarily fed on Poaceae, Convolvulaceae, Cyperaceae and Rosaceae. Generally, the plant-Cassidinae food webs were moderately complex and stable in southern Guangxi. This is the first large contribution to the knowledge of the species composition and host plant diversity of Cassidinae in southern Guangxi.
Cassidinae, host plant, faunal composition, insect-plant network, food web, bipartite network
Cassidinae s.l. is the second largest subfamily in Chrysomelidae (leaf beetles), with 6,273 species, 339 genera and 35 tribes (
Few systematic studies have been conducted on Cassidinae community composition and host diversity in China (
Southern Guangxi (abbreviation for the southern region of Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region, China) belongs to the south-subtropical monsoon climate zone, with abundant rainfall and heat (
In southern Guangxi, some comprehensive investigations were conducted on the biodiversity of plants and higher animals (
Southern Guangxi, including the cities of Nanning, Chongzuo, Qinzhou, Fangchenggang and Beihai, are located in south China (Fig.
Based on digital maps, our previous experience and the knowledge of local guides, we chose survey paths through suitable habitats. Survey hours were usually between 8:30 am and 4:00 pm. Potential host plants were carefully investigated for Cassidinae adults or larvae. Both plants and beetles were placed in plastic zip-lock bags. Collection information including date, location and altitude were recorded. In the laboratory, plants and Cassidinae-fed leaves were individually scanned into images using an Epson 10000XL scanner (
Scientific names of all species (including beetles and hosts) are checked on the Catalogue of Life website (https://www.catalogueoflife.org) (
In order to better present the association between Cassidinae beetles and their host plants, the food webs of plant family-Cassidinae tribe and also that of plant family-Cassidinae genus were constructed using the "bipartite" Package (
Bipartite network metrics |
Description and meaning ( |
links per taxa |
Average number of links per taxa. |
connectance |
Realised proportion of all possible links = standardised number of species combinations. Higher value indicates higher connectance. |
generality |
Mean effective number of host plant families per Cassidinae group. |
vulnerability |
Mean effective number of Cassidinae groups per plant family. |
linkage density |
Average of generality and vulnerability, indicating a weighted diversity of interactions per taxa. |
specialisation degree H2’ |
H2’ indicates the degree of specialisation at network level, ranging between 0 (no specialisation) and 1 (complete specialisation): higher H2’ means higher specialisation. |
weighted nestedness |
A measure of network nestedness weighted by interaction frequencies, ranging between 0 (perfect chaos) and 1 (perfect nestedness). Higher nestedness means lower probability of extinction. |
robustness |
A measure of the network stability to taxa disappearance. Higher robustness indicates higher stability. |
The map was constructed using QGIS 3.26.3 (
All individuals were identified to the species level, except for 123 individuals, which were identified to the genus level (Table
Cassidinae beetles and their host plants in southern Guangxi. Note: "$" new record in China, "*" new record in Guangxi, "#" new record in southern Guangxi, "-" unknown or unidentified plant, "?" uncertain plant species, "&" new record of host plant species for the corresponding Cassidinae species.
Cassidinae beetles |
Host plants |
Anisodera fraterna Baly, 1888# |
Alpinia oblongifolia Hayata& Zingiber mioga (Thunb.) Rosc.& |
Lasiochila anthracina Yu, 1985# |
Ampelocalamus actinotrichus (Merr. et Chun) S. L. Chen et al.& Indocalamus longiauritus Handel-Mazzetti& Pseudosasa amabilis (McClure) Keng f.& |
Lasiochila cylindrica Hope, 1831 |
Microstegium fasciculatum (Linnaeus) Henrard& Lophatherum gracile Brongn.& Pseudosasa amabilis (McClure) Keng f.& |
Aspidomorpha calligera Boheman, 1854 |
Pueraria montana var. lobata (Willdenow) Maesen & S. M. Almeida ex Sanjappa & Predeep& |
Aspidimorpha (s. str.) furcata (Thunberg, 1789) |
Merremia umbellata subsp. orientalis (H.Hallier) van Ooststroom |
Aspidimorpha (s. str.) miliaris (Fabricius, 1775) |
Ipomoea cairica (L.) Sweet |
Aspidimorpha (s. str.) sanctaecrucis (Fabricius, 1792) |
Merremia umbellata subsp. orientalis (H.Hallier) van Ooststroom& |
Laccoptera (Laccopteroidea) nepalensis Boheman, 1855# |
Ipomoea batatas (L.) Lamarck Merremia umbellata subsp. orientalis (H.Hallier) van Ooststroom& |
Laccoptera (Sindiola) vigintisexnotata Boheman, 1855# |
- |
Neodownesia rubra Gressitt, 1953* |
Carex cruciata Wahlenb.& |
Callispa sp. (near C. apicalis Pic, 1924)* |
Bambusa emeiensis L. C. Chia & H. L. Fung& Pseudosasa amabilis (McClure) Keng f.& |
Callispa dimidiatipennis Baly, 1858 |
Indocalamus longiauritus Handel-Mazzetti& Indocalamus tessellatus (Munro) Keng f.& Miscanthus sinensis Anderss.& |
Callispa elliptica Gressitt, 1939* |
Carex cruciata Wahlenb.& |
Callispa frontalis Medvedev, 1992$ |
Indocalamus longiauritus Handel-Mazzetti& |
Callispa ruficollis Fairmaire, 1889# |
Fargesia spathacea Franch.& Indocalamus longiauritus Handel-Mazzetti& Pseudosasa amabilis (McClure) Keng f.& |
Cassida circumdata Herbst, 1799 |
Ipomoea batatas (L.) Lamarck Ipomoea cairica (L.) Sweet Merremia umbellata subsp. orientalis (H.Hallier) van Ooststroom& |
Cassida conchyliata (Spaeth, 1914)* |
Merremia umbellata subsp. orientalis (H.Hallier) van Ooststroom& |
Cassida japana Baly, 1874# |
Ipomoea batatas (L.) Lamarck |
Cassida nucula Spaeth, 1914* |
Alchornea trewioides (Benth.) Muell. Arg.& |
Cassida rati Maulik, 1923# |
Bridelia balansae Tutcher& |
Cassida versicolor (Boheman, 1855)# |
- |
Chiridopsis bowringii (Boheman, 1855) |
Merremia umbellata subsp. orientalis (H.Hallier) van Ooststroom& |
Thlaspida biramosa (Boheman, 1855)# |
Callicarpa bodinieri Levl.& Callicarpa kochiana Makino Callicarpa macrophylla Vahl& |
Agonita chinensis (Weise, 1922) |
Indocalamus barbatus McClure& Saccharum arundinaceum Retz.& |
Agonita immaculata (Gestro, 1888)* |
Indocalamus barbatus McClure& Indocalamus tessellatus (Munro) Keng f.& |
Agonita indenticulata (Pic, 1924)* |
Pseudosasa amabilis (McClure) Keng f.& |
Agonita tricolor Chûjô, 1933* |
Pleioblastus amarus (Keng) Keng f.& |
Downesia atrata Baly, 1869* |
Carex cruciata Wahlenb.& |
Downesia fulvipennis Baly, 1888* |
- |
Downesia ruficolor Pic, 1924* |
Carex cruciata Wahlenb.& Indocalamus tessellatus (Munro) Keng f.& |
Downesia tarsata Baly, 1869* |
Carex cruciata Wahlenb.& Digitaria sanguinalis (L.) Scop.& Indocalamus barbatus McClure& Microstegium fasciculatum (Linnaeus) Henrard& Miscanthus floridulus (Lab.) Warb. ex Schum et Laut. Miscanthus sinensis Anderss.& |
Gonophora pulchella Gestro, 1888* |
Alpinia kwangsiensis T. L. Wu et Senjen&? |
Klitispa mutilata Chen et Sun, 1964# |
Carex cruciata Wahlenb.& Digitaria sanguinalis (L.) Scop.& Miscanthus sinensis Anderss.& |
Klitispa rugicollis Gestro, 1890* |
Digitaria sanguinalis (L.) Scop.& |
Micrispa dentatithorax Pic, 1924* |
Alpinia oblongifolia Hayata& |
Sinagonia foveicollis Chen et T'an, 1962 |
Cyperus compressus L.& Hypolytrum nemorum (Vahl) Sprengel& Paspalum longifolium Roxb.& |
Asamangulia longispina Gressitt, 1950* |
Miscanthus sinensis Anderss.& |
Dactylispa approximata Gressitt, 1939 |
Setaria palmifolia (koen.) Stapf& |
Dactylispa balyi Gestro, 1890 |
Digitaria ciliaris (Retz.) Koel.& Ischaemum aristatum var. glaucum (Honda) T.Koyama& Microstegium vimineum (Trin.) A. Camus& |
Dactylispa chaturanga Maulik, 1919* |
Sterculia lanceolata Cav.& |
Dactylispa chinensis Weise, 1905# |
Callicarpa kochiana Makino& Rubus alceifolius Poiret Rubus caudifolius Wuzhi& Rubus cochinchinensis Tratt.& |
Dactylispa corpulenta Weise, 1897* |
Byttneria grandifolia Candolle& Antidesma montanum var. microphyllum (Hemsley) Petra Hoffmann& |
Dactylispa feae Gestro, 1888 |
Commelina paludosa Bl.& Arthraxon hispidus (Trin.) Makino& Digitaria sanguinalis (L.) Scop.& Digitaria violascens Link& Indocalamus barbatus McClure& Isachne globose (Thunb.) Kuntze& Isachne truncata A. Camus& Ischaemum aristatum var. glaucum (Honda) T.Koyama& Lophatherum gracile Brongn.& Microstegium fasciculatum (Linnaeus) Henrard& Miscanthus sinensis Anderss.& Miscanthus floridulus (Lab.) Warb. ex Schum et Laut.& Oplismenus undulatifolius (Arduino) Beauv.& Ottochloa nodosa (Kunth) Dandy& Paspalum longifolium Roxb.& Setaria geniculata (Lam.) Beauv.& |
Dactylispa flavomaculata Uhmann, 1930* |
Lophatherum gracile Brongn.& |
Dactylispa fukienica Chen et T'an, 1964* |
Lophatherum gracile Brongn.& |
Dactylispa higoniae Lewis, 1896# |
Callicarpa kochiana Makino Callicarpa macrophylla Vahl& |
Dactylispa intermedia Chen et T'an, 1961* |
Rubus cochinchinensis Tratt.& |
Dactylispa klapperichi Uhmann, 1954* |
Rubus cochinchinensis Tratt.& |
Dactylispa lameyi Uhmann, 1930 |
- |
Dactylispa longispina Gressitt, 1938 |
Hypolytrum nemorum (Vahl) Sprengel& Indocalamus barbatus McClure& Microstegium fasciculatum (Linnaeus) Henrard& Miscanthus sinensis Anderss.& Setaria palmifolia (koen.) Stapf |
Dactylispa maculithorax Gestro, 1906* |
Photinia bodinieri Lévl.& |
Dactylispa nigrodiscalis Gressitt, 1938# |
Metadina trichotoma (Zoll. et Mor.) Bakh. F.& Mussaenda pubescens W. T. Aiton& Uncaria rhynchophylla (Miq.) Miq. ex Havil.& |
Dactylispa pici Uhmann, 1934* |
Elaeocarpus duclouxii Gagnep.& |
Dactylispa pilosa T'an et Kung, 1961 |
Ischaemum aristatum var. glaucum (Honda) T.Koyama& Microstegium fasciculatum (Linnaeus) Henrard& Microstegium vimineum (Trin.) A. Camus& |
Dactylispa sauteri Uhmann, 1927# |
Arthraxon prionodes (Steudel) Dandy& Capillipedium assimile (Steud.) A. Camus& Isachne truncate A. Camus& Lophatherum gracile Brongn.& Miscanthus sinensis Anderss.& Pseudosasa amabilis (McClure) Keng f.& Saccharum arundinaceum Retz.& |
Dactylispa setifera Chapuis, 1877 |
Microstegium fasciculatum (Linnaeus) Henrard& Miscanthus sinensis Anderss.& Miscanthus floridulus (Lab.) Warb. ex Schum et Laut.& Thysanolaena latifolia (Roxburgh ex Hornemann) Honda& |
Dactylispa uhmanni Gressitt, 1950* |
Rubus cochinchinensis Tratt.& |
Hispa andrewesi Weise, 1897 |
Microstegium fasciculatum (Linnaeus) Henrard& Miscanthus sinensis Anderss.& Miscanthus floridulus (Lab.) Warb. ex Schum et Laut.& Saccharum arundinaceum Retz.& Isachne globose (Thunb.) Kuntze& |
Rhadinosa fleutiauxi Baly, 1889 |
Digitaria violascens Link& Microstegium fasciculatum (Linnaeus) Henrard& |
Leptispa collaris Chen et Yu, 1961* |
Miscanthus sinensis Anderss.& |
Leptispa longipennis Gestro, 1890# |
Indocalamus barbatus McClure& |
Notosacantha sauteri (Spaeth, 1914)* |
Rhododendron cavaleriei Levl.& |
Notosacantha sp. (near N. trituberculata Gressitt, 1952)* |
Ilex editicostata Hu et Tang& Elaeocarpus glabripetalus Merr.& Rhododendron cavaleriei Levl.& Itea chinensis Hook. et Arn.& Bridelia balansae Tutcher& Aporosa dioica (Roxburgh) Muller Argoviensis& Lasianthus curtisii King et Gamble& Ophiorrhiza kwangsiensis Merr. ex Li& Pavetta hongkongensis Bremek.& Schizomussaenda henryi (Hutch.) X. F. Deng et D. X. Zhang& Schisandra propinqua subsp. sinensis (Oliver) R. M. K. Saunders& Turpinia arguta (Lindl.) Seem.& |
Oncocephala hemicyclica Chen et Yu, 1962* |
Merremia umbellata subsp. orientalis (H.Hallier) van Ooststroom& |
Prionispa clavata (Yu, 1992)* |
- |
Prionispa sp. (near P. sinica Gressitt, 1950)* |
Commelina paludosa Bl.& Pollia japónica Thunb.& Hellenia speciosa (J.Koenig) S.R.Dutta& |
Representatives of six tribes of Cassidinae beetles in southern Guangxi, China. Scale bar = 1 mm.
Representatives of the other four tribes of Cassidinae beetles in southern Guangxi, China. Scale bar = 1 mm.
The tribes with the highest number of genera were Gonophorini (six genera) and Hispini (four genera), together accounting for 43.5% of the total, followed by Cassidini (three genera), Aspidimorphini (two genera), Oncocephalini (two genera) and the tribes Anisoderini, Botryonopini, Callispini, Notosacanthini and Leptispini (one genus each).
The most species-rich tribe was Hispini (23 species), followed by Gonophorini (13 species), together accounting for 54.5% of the total. The tribes Cassidini (eight species) and Aspidimorphini (six species). The remaining 16 species belonged to six tribes (Callispini [5], Oncocephalini [3], Anisoderini [3], Notosacanthini [2], Leptispini [2] and Botryonopini [1]).
The tribe Hispini (1,522 individuals) had the highest number of individuals, with 67.5% of the total, followed by Gonophorini (9%, 203 individuals), Cassidini (6.9%, 155 individuals) and Callispini (5.9%, 132 individuals). The remaining 242 individuals belonged to six tribes (Anisoderini, Aspidimorphini, Botryonopini, Oncocephalini, Notosacanthini and Leptispini) (Fig.
In Hispini, Dactylispa Weise was the dominant genus in both species and individuals, with 20 species (87% of total) and 1,477 individuals (97% of total), while Asamangulia Maulik (18 individuals), Hispa Linnaeus (25 individuals) and Rhadinosa Weise (two individuals) had one species each.
In Gonophorini, there were 203 individuals from 13 species and six genera. The most abundant genus was Agonita Strand, with four species (30.8% of the total) and 79 individuals (38.9% of the total) and then Downesia Baly, with four species (30.8%) and 69 individuals (34%). Other genera were Klitispa Uhmann (39 individuals) with two species, Sinagonia Chen et T'an (ten individuals), Gonophora Chevrolat (four individuals) and Micrispa Gestro (two individuals) with one species each.
In Cassidini, the specimens (155 individuals) belonged to three genera (Cassida Linnaeus, Chiridopsis Spaeth and Thlaspida Weise). Cassida Linnaeus had six species (75%) and 66 individuals (42.3%), Chiridopsis Spaeth (13 individuals) and Thlaspida Weise (76 individuals) had one species each.
Sixty-six species of Cassidinae were collected, with 47 newly-recorded species in southern Guangxi, 33 newly-recorded species in the whole Guangxi and one newly-recorded species in China (Fig.
Except for the tribe Aspidimorphini, the remaining nine tribes had newly-recorded species in Guangxi. The tribe with the greatest number of newly-recorded species was Hispini, with 14 new records in southern Guangxi and ten in Guangxi. The tribe Gonophorini had eleven newly-recorded species in southern Guangxi and ten in Guangxi. The tribe Cassidini had six newly-recorded species in southern Guangxi and two in Guangxi. The tribe Callispini had four newly-recorded species in southern Guangxi and three in Guangxi, amongst which, Callispa frontalis Medvedev, 1992 was newly recorded in China. The tribe Oncocephalini had three newly-recorded species in southern Guangxi as well as in Guangxi. The tribe Notosacanthini was recorded in Guangxi for the first time and it had two newly-recorded species in southern Guangxi as well as in Guangxi. The tribes Anisoderini and Leptispini had two newly-recorded species in southern Guangxi and one in Guangxi, respectively. The tribe Botryonopini had one newly-recorded species in southern Guangxi as well as in Guangxi.
A total of 19 families, 53 genera and 69 species of host plants of Cassidinae were collected in southern Guangxi. The family Poaceae had the richest hosts (29 species), followed by Rubiaceae (seven host species), Rosaceae (four host species) and then Cyperaceae, Convolvulaceae, Lamiaceae, Phyllanthaceae and Zingiberaceae (each with three host species). Many host plant associations were new records for Cassidinae (Suppl. material
In the two quantitative food webs between host plant families and Cassidinae groups in southern Guangxi (Table
Characteristics of plant family-Cassidinae tribe food web and plant family-Cassidinae genus food web in southern Guangxi.
Bipartite network metrics |
Host family-Cassidinae tribe |
Host family-Cassidinae genus |
number of plant taxa |
19 |
19 |
number of Cassidinae taxa |
10 |
23 |
links per taxa |
1.207 |
1.095 |
connectance |
0.184 |
0.105 |
generality |
4.009 |
3.636 |
vulnerability |
2.721 |
4.839 |
linkage density |
3.365 |
4.238 |
specialisation degree H2’ |
0.443 |
0.329 |
weighted nestedness |
0.490 |
0.638 |
robustness |
0.518 |
0.585 |
According to the food web plots between plant families and Cassidinae groups (Figs
This study is the first systematic investigation of the community composition and species abundance of Cassidinae in southern Guangxi. Sixty-six Cassidinae species were collected, which was 13.8% of the total number of Cassidinae species known from China. At the tribal level, Hispini had the highest number of species in southern Guangxi (23 species, 16.9% of China fauna). At the generic level, Dactylispa Weise had the highest number of species (20 species, 14.7% of China), In our previous report in Longnan County, Hispini is also the most dominant tribe, while Dactylispa Weise is also the most dominant genus (
Amongst the six sites, ten tribes, 20 genera, 55 species and 2053 individuals were collected at Damingshan; six tribes, eight genera, twelve species and 42 individuals were collected at Nonggang; five tribes, eight genera, twelve species and 110 individuals were collected at Xidamingshan; three tribes, four genera, seven species and 41 individuals were collected at Shiwandashan; one tribe, one genus, three species and eight individuals were collected at Wuhuangshan; and only one species and one individual were collected at Fangcheng. Damingshan had the highest number of Cassidinae species and individuals, followed by Nonggang, Shiwandashan and Xidamingshan, while the lowest number of species and individuals were found in Wuhuangshan and Fangcheng. Such variation of cassidinae composition in different places, might be related to several possible reasons such as different climatic conditions, different plant richness, different human disturbance levels and different sampling efforts.
Forty-four Cassidinae species have been previously reported in southern Guangxi (with a terrestrial area of 43,984,900 hm2) (
Generally, the plant-Cassidinae food webs in southern Guangxi were moderately complex and stable. Similar to the previous study on a neotropical host plant-hispine beetle food web (
The results of this study may reflect only a tiny part of the insect resources in southern Guangxi. Due to the limitations of working time and human resources, we only collected specimens from some representative protected areas. In addition, some specimens might be damaged during collection, transportation, raising and preservation. Therefore, some Cassidinae species still lacked information on their host plants and life histories. In the future, continuous in-depth investigations are still needed to reveal the diversity and ecology of Cassidinae.
We thank Damingshan National Nature Reserve, Nonggang National Nature Reserve, Shiwandashan National Nature Reserve, Fangcheng Golden Camellia National Nature Reserve, Xidamingshan Autonomous Region Nature Reserve, Longhushan Autonomous Region Nature Reserve, Longshan Autonomous Region Nature Reserve and Nongla Autonomous Region Nature Reserve for providing fieldwork assistance. Sincere thanks to Dr. Lukáš Sekerka (National Museum, Czech Republic) for Cassidinae species identification, Dr. Xiaoya Yu (Qiannan Normal University for Nationalities) and Dr. Yinghua Luo (Guangxi University) for host plant identification. This research is funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (32260282, 41971059, 32160314, and 31760173).
Geographic, climatic and biological information of the six collection sites.
All identified Cassidinae beetles and their confirmed host plants, including the occurrences of Cassidinae species in six collection sites.
Associations between host plants and their corresponding Cassidinae beetles.