Biodiversity Data Journal :
Taxonomic Paper
|
Corresponding author: Anna Novichkova (anna.hydro@gmail.com)
Academic editor: Niamh Kilgallen
Received: 26 Oct 2016 | Accepted: 22 Dec 2016 | Published: 23 Dec 2016
© 2016 Anna Novichkova
This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Citation:
Novichkova A (2016) The first data on the freshwater microcrustaceans of Shokalsky Island (Russian Arctic). Biodiversity Data Journal 4: e10930. https://doi.org/10.3897/BDJ.4.e10930
|
Information on freshwater invertebrates of the Russian Arctic is very scarce, especially concerning insular biota. The species composition of microcrustaceans (Cladocera, Copepoda) of many arctic islands is still unknown and have never been explored. Here we report the results of the first investigation of the zooplankton of the Shokalsky Island (YamaloNenets Autonomous Okrug, Russia).
Information on freshwater invertebrates of the Russian Arctic is very scarce, especially concerning insular biota. The species composition of microcrustaceans (Cladocera, Copepoda) of many arctic islands is still unknown and have never been explored. Here we report the results of the first investigation of the zooplankton of the Shokalsky Island (YamaloNenets Autonomous Okrug, Russia).
The new records reported here are novel for the region and significantly expand the knowledge of the high-latitude aquatic biota. We studied the species composition of Cladocera and Copepoda of 21 freshwater habitats located on the southwestern part of Shokalsky Island. We found 15 species of microcrustaceans in total and all of them are reported for the first time here. Also, the obtained data expand the existing ranges of distribution of some species and report several new taxa for the whole YamaloNenets region of Russia.
Cladocera, Copepoda, microcrustaceans, freshwater, Russian Arctic, Shokalsky Island
Shokalsky Island is a small island in the Kara Sea located in the YamaloNenets Autonomous Okrug of Russia (Fig.
The samples were collected during a hydrobiological survey of the compex expedition of KUBZ (Moscow Zoo young biologist's coterie) in August, 2014. Microcrustaceans were collected from 21 freshwater habitats from southwestern part of Shokalsky Island, most of them were small thermokarst ponds with the depth of 0.5 - 1.5 m (Fig.
Locations and dates of sampling with notes on the water body type and substratum (bottom sediment).
Site No. |
Date | Coordinates | Altitude | Water body type | Bottom Sediment | Average Size | Average Depth |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 |
03.08.2014 |
|
7m | bayou pond | silt, mosses | 5m x 13m | 0.5m |
2 |
03.08.2014 |
|
2m | bayou pond | silt | 5m x 10m | 0.5m |
3 |
03.08.2014 |
|
-6m | bayou pond | silt | 8m x 20m | 0.3m |
4 |
04.08.2014 |
|
-1m | thermokarst pond | silt, detritus | 6m x 10m | 0.5m |
5 | 04.08.2014 |
|
7m | thermokarst pond |
clay, sand |
15m x 30m | 1.5m |
6 | 05.08.2014 |
|
3m | thermokarst pond |
mosses |
1.5m x 15m |
1.5m |
7 | 05.08.2014 |
|
boggy stream |
mosses |
1m x 1.5m | 1.5m | |
8 | 06.08.2014 |
|
-1m | thermokarst pond |
clay, silt |
5m x 10m | 0.5m |
9 | 07.08.2014 |
|
3m | bayou pond |
sand, mosses |
3m x 5m | 0.5m |
10 | 07.08.2014 |
|
0m | thermokarst pond |
sand, mosses |
2m x 5m | 1.5m |
11 | 10.08.2014 |
|
-1m | thermokarst pond |
silt, mosses |
5m x 10m | 1m |
12 | 10.08.2014 |
|
8m | thermokarst pond |
sand, mosses |
1.5m x 6m |
0.5m |
13 | 11.08.2014 |
|
3m | thermokarst pond |
mosses |
2m x 2.5m | 1m |
14 | 12.08.2014 |
|
3m | thermokarst pond |
sand, mosses |
2m x 10m | 0.5m |
15 | 12.08.2014 |
|
9m | thermokarst pond |
silt, mosses |
1.5m x 2m | 1.5m |
16 | 13.08.2014 |
|
1m | thermokarst pond |
silt, mosses |
5m x 20m |
2m |
17 | 13.08.2014 |
|
0m | thermokarst pond |
sand, silt |
10m x 30m |
2m |
18 | 14.08.2014 |
|
thermokarst pond |
silt, mosses |
5m x 20m |
1m | |
19 | 15.08.2014 |
|
-9m | thermokarst pond |
silty sand, mosses |
20m x 40m | 1m |
20 | 15.08.2014 |
|
0m | thermokarst pond | clay | 20m x 45m | 1.5m |
21 | 15.08.2014 |
|
7m | lake |
sand |
450m x 550m | 1.5m |
localities no. 1, 7. Distribution: AT, AU, NA, NT, OL, PA.
localities no. 1, 3, 5, 6, 7, 16, 21. Distribution: AT, AU, NA, NT, OL, PA.
locality no. 9. Distribution: AT, AU, NA, OL, PA.
localities no. 1-9, 11, 13, 16, 19, 20, 21. Distribution: AT, AU, NA, NT, OL, PAC, PA.
locality no. 17. Distribution (subsp. testudinaria): AT, AU, NA, NT, OL, PA.
localities no. 1, 21. Distribution: NA, PA.
localities no. 3, 5, 6, 7, 13, 19. Distribution: AT, NA, NT, PA.
localities no. 1, 6, 7. Distribution: NA, NT, PA.
locality no. 1. Distribution: PA.
localities no. 17, 18. Distribution: : AT, ANT, AU, NA, NT, OL, PAC, PA.
localities no. 21. Distribution: NA, PA.
localities no. 1-9, 13, 14, 20, 21. Distribution: NA, PA
localities no. 1, 4, 18, 19.
locality no. 1. Distribution: PA (Europe (Austria, France....), Greenland, Northern Alaska (Colville River)).
localities no. 1-9, 12, 13, 14, 18, 20, 21. Distribution: NA (Arctic and Subarctic Canada, to the Kuril Islands).
In total 15 species of microcrustaceans were identified, comprising 12 species in 12 genera of Cladocera, and three species in three genera of Copepoda. All of the taxa have not been previously documented on the island. Microcrustaceans were found in 90% of the studied sites. The number of species encountered in each water body varied from one to ten (Table
Main characteristics of microcrustacean communities in the observed water bodies.
Site No. |
Dominant species (% of total abundance) |
Subdominants (% of total abundance) |
Total number of species |
1 |
Scapholeberis mucronata (20%) + Chydorus sphaericus (19,2%) |
Simocephalus vetulus (15,8%) | 10 |
2 | Leptodiaptomus angustilobius (83,3%) | Polyphemus pediculus (12,5%) | 3 |
3 | Polyphemus pediculus (90,8%) | Chydorus sphaericus (6,5%) | 5 |
4 | Leptodiaptomus angustilobius (99,7%) | - | 4 |
5 | Leptodiaptomus angustilobius (97,9%) | - | 5 |
6 | Leptodiaptomus angustilobius (70,4%) | Chydorus sphaericus (23,5%) | 6 |
7 | Polyphemus pediculus (62,1%) | Chydorus sphaericus (15,3%) | 7 |
8 | Polyphemus pediculus (57,1%) |
Chydorus sphaericus (28,6%) + Leptodiaptomus angustilobius (14,3%) |
3 |
9 | Chydorus sphaericus (51%) | Polyphemus pediculus (36%) | 4 |
10 | - | - | 0 |
11 | Chydorus sphaericus (100%) | - | 1 |
12 | Leptodiaptomus angustilobius (100%) | - | 1 |
13 | Leptodiaptomus angustilobius (86,2%) | 4 | |
14 | Polyphemus pediculus (72,2%) | 2 | |
15 | - | - | 0 |
16 | Chydorus sphaericus (95,7%) |
Alona affinis (4,3%) |
2 |
17 | Bosmina longirostris (80%) | Graptoleberis testudinaria (20%) | 2 |
18 | Leptodiaptomus angustilobius (66,7%) | Cyclops vicinus (25%) | 4 |
19 | Chydorus sphaericus (93,8%) | - | 4 |
20 | Leptodiaptomus angustilobius (88,5%) | Chydorus sphaericus (8,8%) |
3 |
21 | Polyphemus pediculus (61,2%) | Leptodiaptomus angustilobius (24,3%) | 6 |
The distributional ranges of all the species are rather wide, none of them are restricted to the arctic area or more limited region. The areas of the species are noted in the Checklist according to the FADA Databases of Cladocera (
The studies were supported by the Russian Science Foundation (Grant 14-14-00778). The material was collected by Chertoprud EM.