Biodiversity Data Journal :
Research Article
|
Corresponding author: Sebastien J Puechmaille (sebastien.puechmaille@umontpellier.fr)
Academic editor: Danny Haelewaters
Received: 20 Jul 2023 | Accepted: 26 Oct 2023 | Published: 02 Feb 2024
© 2024 Violeta Zhelyazkova, Nicola Fischer, Sebastien Puechmaille
This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Citation:
Zhelyazkova VL, Fischer NM, Puechmaille SJ (2024) Bat white-nose disease fungus diversity in time and space. Biodiversity Data Journal 12: e109848. https://doi.org/10.3897/BDJ.12.e109848
|
White-nose disease (WND), caused by the psychrophilic fungus Pseudogymnoascus destructans, represents one of the greatest threats for North American hibernating bats. Research on molecular data has significantly advanced our knowledge of various aspects of the disease, yet more studies are needed regarding patterns of P. destructans genetic diversity distribution. In the present study, we investigate three sites within the native range of the fungus in detail: two natural hibernacula (karst caves) in Bulgaria, south-eastern Europe and one artificial hibernaculum (disused cellar) in Germany, northern Europe, where we conducted intensive surveys between 2014 and 2019. Using 18 microsatellite and two mating type markers, we describe how P. destructans genetic diversity is distributed between and within sites, the latter including differentiation across years and seasons of sampling; across sampling locations within the site; and between bats and hibernaculum walls. We found significant genetic differentiation between hibernacula, but we could not detect any significant differentiation within hibernacula, based on the variables examined. This indicates that most of the pathogen’s movement occurs within sites. Genotypic richness of P. destructans varied between sites within the same order of magnitude, being approximately two times higher in the natural caves (Bulgaria) compared to the disused cellar (Germany). Within all sites, the pathogen’s genotypic richness was higher in samples collected from hibernaculum walls than in samples collected from bats, which corresponds with the hypothesis that hibernacula walls represent the environmental reservoir of the fungus. Multiple pathogen genotypes were commonly isolated from a single bat (i.e. from the same swab sample) in all study sites, which might be important to consider when studying disease progression.
Chiroptera, emerging infectious disease, fungal pathogen, wildlife disease, white-nose syndrome, Leotiomycetes, Thebolales, Pseudeurotiaceae
Genetic diversity not only provides the raw material for the evolution of species, but significantly influences the size, dynamics and fitness of a population, species interactions and ecosystem functions (Hughes et al. 2008). It also plays a crucial role in pathogen-host interactions, virulence and transmission and determines the potential for the emergence of more (or less) adaptative and dangerous pathogen variants. Thus, information on a pathogen’s genetic diversity and its distribution is important for understanding infectious diseases, including wildlife diseases such as White-nose disease (WND) in hibernating bats.
White-nose disease represents one of the greatest challenges for North American bat conservation. The disease has caused an estimated 5.7 to 6.7 million casualties for the first 5 years after its emergence (
At small geographical scales (within individual hibernacula), the use of genetic data has been central in elucidating P. destructans life cycle and transmission routes. Indeed,
To address these questions, we intensively studied P. destructans at three bat hibernacula in Europe: two karst caves in Bulgaria and a disused cellar in Germany (cf.
For Bulgaria, swab samples were collected from bats and walls in two karst caves, Balabanova dupka (N43.13, E23.04) and Ivanova voda (N41.89, E24.88; Suppl. material
Swab samples were collected from the muzzle, ears or wings of freely hanging and visibly infected M. myotis/blythii at the end of the hibernation season (March – June) between 2015 and 2019, without handling the bats (
For Germany, we used data collected in the same way over 5 years (2015–2019) from the Eldena hibernaculum (N54.09, E13.44) situated in the north-eastern Federal State of Mecklenburg-Vorpommern (Suppl. material
We used culturing methods to physically separate different fungal genotypes infecting the same host, to provide a sufficient quantity of fungal material for the microsatellite analysis and to prove that the studied fungal spores were viable. The percentage of P. destructans positive samples per season varied between 3 and 74 for samples collected from the cave walls (P. destructans not visible) and between 42 and 100 for samples collected from bats (P. destructans visible). The lowest values for wall samples came from Ivanova voda where spring floods regularly occur, potentially washing away or killing fungal spores. Another factor that can reduce fungal yield is the time elpased between sample collection and plating: in 2017, due to the lack of funding, we plated some samples later than in other years.
In the lab, each swab was cultured on a Petri dish containing DPYA growing medium (
DNA extraction was performed following the protocol in
The genotypic analysis was based on the identification of multilocus genotypes (MLGs) which are defined by the distinct combination of alleles at the 18 microsatellite loci. Despite the presence of two mating types in this species (
Missing data were not used as information to define MLG identity and MLGs containing more than 20% of missing data (seven MLGs in total) were excluded from the analysis. Calculations of allelic diversity and differentiation were performed on clone-corrected data, meaning that only one single spore isolate of each MLG was retained per site or per analysed within-site groups. All analyses were performed in R software (version 4.0.1,
To estimate population structure between and within hibernacula, we tracked individual MLGs in space and time. To evaluate MLG movement, we divided the number of shared MLGs between the factors considered (site, hibernaculum room, year and season of sampling (winter-spring/autumn) and substrate (bat/wall)) by the total number of MLGs (i.e. the total number of MLGs across sites [for the factor site] or total number of MLG per site [for other factors]). We removed MLGs appearing only once throughout the dataset as, by definition, these cannot be shared.
We also applied AMOVA (analysis of molecular variance,
The number of expected MLGs (eMLGs) at the smallest shared sample size (based on rarefaction with 1000 permutations) was used to compare genotypic richness (total number of MLGs) between hibernacula. For estimating population size (= expected genotypic richness or expected total number of MLGs), we used the CMRPopHet functions implementing a capture-mark-recapture (CMR) model, based on a single sampling event (
By comparing genotypic richness of the fungus isolated from bats and from hibernaculum walls,
We used here a dataset containing a total of 1925 P. destructans single spore isolates, of which 608 came from Balabanova dupka, 255 from Ivanova voda and 1062 from Eldena. The average number of single spore isolates per bat swab was 4.84 (range 2-6, median 5) for Balabanova dupka, 4.5 (range 1-6, median 5) for Ivanova voda and 2.76 (range 1-4, median 3) for Eldena. For wall swabs, we obtained an average of 2.78 single spore isolates per swab (range 1-6, median 2) for Balabanova dupka, 2.21 (range 1-6, median 1) for Ivanova voda and 3.51 (range 1-5, median 4.5) for Eldena. We successfully amplified all microsatellite and mating type markers, with an overall amount of missing data of 1.2%.
The AMOVA detected no significant allelic differentiation within sites with regard to any of the factors considered: hibernaculum room, time of sampling (year and season) and substrate (bat or wall). Additionally, within a site, MLGs were often shared amongst rooms, years and season and substrates, especially in Balabanova dupka and Eldena. Across hibernaculum rooms, 54.2%, 6.8% and 80.2% of MLGs were shared in Balabanova dupka, Ivanova voda and Eldena, respectively, including rooms where bats were not encountered during our hibernation surveys. Across sampling years and seasons, 61.7%, 22.7% and 80.2% of MLGs found at least twice were shared in Balabanova dupka, Ivanova voda and Eldena, respectively (Fig.
Visual representation of shared multilocus genotypes (MLGs) in the three study sites Balabanova dupka, Ivanova voda and Eldena across time and between bats and walls. Each row represents a particular MLG and a circle signifies that this MLG was detected during the particular sampling event. The bar graph represents the relative frequencies of MLG occurrence. The code used to recreate the graph was obtained from
As shown by AMOVA (see Suppl. materials
All studied loci were polymorphic, their mean richness being highest in Ivanova voda and lowest in Eldena (Table
Comparison of P. destructans genetic diversity in the three study sites. Swab is the total number of swab samples collected from each site, both from bats and hibernaculum walls; SSI is the total number of single spore isolates of P. destructans (= sample size); Allele is the mean number of alleles per locus; MLG is the total number of multilocus genotypes observed; eMLG is the number of expected multilocus genotype at the smallest shared sample size between the three sites (n = 255); Pop size is the estimated population size, based on the CMR model; HPD95% is the highest probability density of the population size estimate; M1 & M2 are the percentages of mating type MAT1_1 & MAT1_2, respectively.
Swab |
SSIs |
Allele |
MLG |
eMLG |
Pop size |
HPD 95% |
M1 |
M2 |
|
Balabanova dupka |
172 |
608 |
12.5 |
301 |
170.5 |
377 |
352-401 |
68.5% |
31.5% |
Ivanova voda |
74 |
255 |
14.6 |
165 |
165 |
274 |
233-317 |
70.2% |
29.8% |
Eldena |
364 |
1062 |
6 |
149 |
77.3 |
150 |
150-151 |
42.4% |
57.6% |
Within sites, genotypic richness of P. destructans, estimated as the number of eMLGs, was consistently higher in swab samples taken from walls than in swab samples taken from bats (Table
Comparison of P. destructans genotypic richness found on bats and walls in the study sites. Abbreviations are as defined for Table
Swab |
SSI |
MLG |
eMLG |
(G-1)/(N-1) |
||
Balabanova dupka |
Bats |
63 |
305 |
159 |
158.3 |
0.58 |
Walls |
109 |
303 |
196 |
196 |
0.94 |
|
Ivanova voda |
Bats |
40 |
180 |
101 |
55.1 |
0.54 |
Walls |
34 |
75 |
69 |
69 |
0.97 |
|
Eldena |
Bats |
286 |
788 |
118 |
76.5 |
0.61 |
Walls |
78 |
274 |
84 |
84 |
0.85 |
Multiple MLGs were very commonly found on the same bat swab. Indeed, after taking exactly three single spore isolates per swab, multiple MLGs were found in 83.6%, 80.9% and 83.3% of bat swabs in Balabanova dupka, Ivanova voda and Eldena, respectively. Both mating types of the pathogen were found in 44%, 39.3% and 46.4% of bat swabs in Balabanova dupka, Ivanova voda and Eldena, respectively.
Both mating types were present in all hibernacula although with different proportions, whereby the Bulgarian sites were more similar to each other than they were to the German site (Table
According to the CMR model, P. destructans population size (or the total number of MLGs predicted to be present) was 377 MLGs (Highest Probability Density [HPD] 95% 352-401) for Balabanova dupka, 274 MLGs (HPD95% 233-317) for Ivanova voda and 150 MLGs (HPD95% 150-151) for Eldena (Table
The dataset and the R script used for the analysis are presented in Suppl. materials
The present study is the first one to characterise P. destructans genetic diversity and its distribution at multiple spatial scales in natural hibernacula within the native range of the fungus. As expected, none of the factors considered within a site, including substrate (bats or walls), time (across sampling years and seasons) or space (hibernaculum rooms), was associated with significant allelic or genotypic differentiation of P. destructans. The lack of significant differentiation between bats and hibernaculum walls is consistent with the known life cycle of P. destructans, whereby yearly re-infection of bats originates from the environmental reservoir, which is, in turn, replenished by bats shedding fungal spores towards the end of the hibernation season (
The lack of significant differentiation across sampling seasons is consistent with the long-term survival of the pathogen in hibernacula, demonstrated by
On the other hand, the population structure of P. destructans, based on different rooms of the same hibernaculum, had never been studied before and the absence of significant genetic differentiation is consistent with the ecology of hibernating bat species. In autumn, when bats arrive at their hibernaculum, they often engage in mating or other social interaction, flying around, landing and crawling on different places/rooms of the roost walls, the so-called swarming behaviour. Elevated activity of bats within the site is also observed in spring, when the animals prepare for moving out and can hang in different places across the hibernaculum. Even in winter, bats regularly interrupt their torpor bouts (
Altogether, our results show that P. destructans populations are not genetically differentiated within a site, suggesting ample pathogen movement. This does not rule out the possibility that certain factors (different microclimates or the segregation of bat species within a site) could act as barriers for P. destructans or lead to the selection of certain pathogen genotypes. However, even if such barriers/selection pressures exist, it seems that bat movement within a site is sufficient to mask their effects.
In agreement with our expectation, we detected significant allelic differentiation in P. destructans populations and we did not find a single pathogen MLG shared between sites for the full duration of our study. Although our number of sites is low (n = 3), it is worth noting that our results are in complete agreement with the results of
Our results confirmed the expectation that P. destructans genotypic richness at different sites in Europe varies within the same order of magnitude, pointing to the presence of up to 400 different MLGs in a single hibernaculum, possibly even more. The differences in P. destructans genetic diversity between Balabanova dupka and Ivanova voda on the one hand and Eldena on the other hand can be due to several factors such as: type of roost (natural roosts are larger and older and provide more diversity of microhabitats and microbial communities, as well as more organic matter); bat colony size (thousands in the caves vs. hundreds in Eldena); usage by bats (possibly hundreds to thousands of years in the caves vs. several decades in Eldena); geographic location (biological diversity is higher in the lower in comparison to the higher latitudes); or possible environmental growth of P. destructans. Yet, our data do not allow us to identify the most significant of those.
No hibernacula have been intensively surveyed in North America to allow the calculation of genotypic richness within an individual site, but patterns observed across many sites with a limited number of isolates characterised and a reduced number of loci (9 versus 18 in the present study) suggest a much reduced genotypic richness with MLGs shared across much larger distances than in Europe (e.g.
Within the same site, we found shared MLGs between walls and bats and consistently higher genotypic richness of P. destructans on walls compared to bats. Thus, our results corroborate the hypothesis tested in
Infections with multiple MLGs were prevalent in bats, with more than 80% of the bat swabs harbouring multiple P. destructans MLGs. However, we only considered three fungal isolates per swab and the number of P. destructans spores that infect a bat at the start of hibernation is estimated to be roughly between 50 and 500 (
We discovered no significant genetic differentiation in P. destructans population within sites contrasting with the strong genetic differentiation observed between sites. This indicates that the rate of pathogen movement is magnitudes higher within compared to between hibernacula and underlines the importance of studies investigating spatial and temporal changes at individual sites to better understand the intricacies of host-pathogen interactions. Additionally, we highlight the considerable genotypic richness of the pathogen within any of our study sites, which, in turn, leads to a high frequency of multiple infections in bats with potentially important biological consequences. Altogether, our results not only advance fundamental knowledge on P. destructans and WND, but also provide critical information to design studies and suggest novel directions for future research.
The authors would like to thank Nia Toshkova, Antonia Hubancheva, Ivailo Borissov, Momchil Naydenov, Krum Sirakov, Alexander Lazarov, Tsvetan Ostromsky and all cavers and friends who participated in the fieldwork, Salza Palpurina who helped with the code, Gancho Slavov who critically reviewed the data analysis and Georgi Radoslavov and Peter Hristov who provided lab space to cultivate P. destructans from Bulgaria.
Geographic location of our study sites. Balabanova dupka and Ivanova voda are natural karst caves only accessible with caving equipment and Eldena is an artificial hibernaculum, a disused cellar.
Sampling locations (rooms) in relevance to the hibernating bat colonies in the two studied Bulgarian caves. In Balabanova dupka, the entire colony of Myotis myotis/blythii hibernates in Room 1. Bats are found occasionally in spring and autumn in Rooms 2 & 3. The map is modified from Georgiev et al. (2016). In Ivanova voda, the colony of Myotis myotis/blythi hibernates mostly in Rooms 2 & 3 and the colony of Myotis capaccinii hibernates mostly in Room 4 and 5, above a large lake. The cave can flood in spring, the water reaching up to Room 3. The original map was made by S. Adreeev and H. Delchev (1962).
Sampling locations (rooms) in the artificial hibernaculum Eldena in Germany. Here, Myotis daubentonii, M. nattereri and M. myotis hibernate. R stands for Room. Bats hibernate in all rooms although in different numbers. Samples were collected in all rooms, except rooms 1 and 12.
Summary of the numbers of swab samples, single spore isolates (SSIs) and multilocus genotypes (MLGs) of P. destructans obtained from bats and from hibernacula walls in the study sites divided by season.
Summary of the number of swab samples, single spore isolates (SSIs) and multilocus genotypes (MLGs) of P. destructans obtained from bats and from hibernacula walls in the study sites divided by rooms.
Allelic richness per locus in the three study sites. Calculations were performed on clone corrected data after single spore isolates with missing data were removed.
Outputs of the heterogeneity test developed by Puechmaille & Petit (2007) for the three study sites. This analysis is used to test the assumption of the capture-mark-recapture (CMR) model that each MLG has the same probability of being sampled. Filled circles show the model distribution of captures or singles spore isolates (SSIs) obtained per individual multilocus genotype (MLG) under the assumption that each MLG has the same probability of being sampled (the population is homogenous). Empty circles show the highest probability density of the population size estimate (HPD95%). Triangles show the observed distribution of obtained SSIs per individual MLG.
Comparison of P. destructans genetic diversity in the study sites when one single spore isolate only is considered per swab. Swab is the total number of swab samples collected from each site, both from bats and hibernacula walls; SSI is the total number of single spore isolates of P. destructans (= sample size); Allele is the mean number of alleles per locus; MLG is the total number of multilocus genotypes observed; eMLG is the number of expected multilocus genotype at the smallest shared sample size between the three sites (n = 255); Pop size is the estimated population size based on the CMR model; HPD 95% is the highest probability density of the population size estimate; M1 & M2 are the percentage of mating type MAT1_1 & MAT1_2, respectively.
Comparison of P. destructans genotypic diversity found on bats and walls in the study sites when one (top) or two (bottom) SSIs are considered per swab. Abbreviations are as defined for Supplement 5. For the analysis with two single spore isolates per swab, all swabs that had given only one single spore isolate were removed. As the smallest shared sample size is calculated for bats and walls within each individual site, the reported eMLG values should only be compared within sites.
This is the dataset combining microsatellite data on P. destructans from Bulgaria and Germany analysed in the present research.
This is the R script used to analyse the data.