Biodiversity Data Journal :
Taxonomy & Inventories
|
Corresponding author: Kai Wang (kai_wang@hubu.edu.cn)
Academic editor: Yanfeng Tong
Received: 15 Sep 2023 | Accepted: 20 Oct 2023 | Published: 25 Oct 2023
© 2023 Changhao Hu, Jie Liu, Kai Wang
This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Citation:
Hu C, Liu J, Wang K (2023) First description of the male of Oecobius przewalskyi Hu & Li, 1987 (Araneae, Oecobiidae) from Shigatse City, Tibet, China. Biodiversity Data Journal 11: e112801. https://doi.org/10.3897/BDJ.11.e112801
|
|
With 90 described species, the genus Oecobius Lucas, 1846 is the largest genus of the family Oecobiidae Blackwall, 1862, five of which are known from China. Since Oceobius przewalskyi was described by Hu & Li in 1987, no males of this species have ever been reported.
The male of Oceobius przewalskyi is described for the first time, based on the specimens collected in Tibet Autonomous Region. Morphological description and illustrations are given.
Qinghai-Tibet Plateau, morphology, taxonomy, biodiversity
The genus Oecobius Lucas, 1846 is distributed in Asia, Europe, Africa, North and South America with 90 species, five of them recorded in China: O. cellariorum (Dugès, 1836), O. marathaus Tikader, 1962, O. nadiae (Spassky, 1936), O. navus Blackwall, 1859 and O. przewalskyi Hu & Li, 1987 (
The species Oecobius przewalskyi Hu & Li, 1987 was firstly described, based on female specimens only from Shigatse (Tibet Autonomous Region, China) (
The specimens examined in this study were deposited in the Centre for Behavioural Ecology and Evolution, College of Life Sciences, Hubei University in Wuhan. Specimens were examined using an OLYMPUS SZX7 stereomicroscope. Photographs were taken with a LEICA M205 C stereomicroscope and OLYMPUS SXZ16 microscope and final multifocal images were produced with Helicon Focus (Version 7.7.0). The male palp was examined and photographed after dissection. The epigyne was examined after being dissected from the spider’s body. The epigyne was removed and treated in a warmed 0.1 mg/ml Protease K solution before study. All morphological measurements were calculated using a Leica M205 C stereomicroscope. Eye diameters were taken at the widest point. Leg measurements were given as total length of leg (femur, patella, tibia, metatarsus, tarsus). All measurements were in millimetres (mm).
Morphological terminology follows
Oecobius przewalskyi Hu & Li, 1987 in
Male: Total length 2.18. Carapace 0.80 long, 0.93 wide. Abdomen 1.49 long, 0.95 wide. Diameters of eyes: AME 0.04, ALE 0.06, PME 0.05, PLE 0.06. Interdistances of eyes: AME‒AME 0.04, AME‒ALE 0.03, PME‒PME 0.08, PME‒PLE 0.01, AME‒PME 0.06, ALE‒PLE 0.02. Eyes white with black rings, except PME. Carapace light yellowish-brown with black margin, except clypeal projection, fovea black. Palps, chelicerae, labium and legs pale brown without marks. Measurements of legs: I 2.81 (0.83, 0.25, 0.67, 0.54, 0.52), II 3.00 (0.85, 0.24, 0.72, 0.69, 0.50), III 3.20 (0.92, 0.25, 0.73, 0.77, 0.53), IV 3.30 (0.92, 0.22, 0.76, 0.86, 0.54). Leg formula: IV-III-II-I. Abdomen dorsally yellowish-brown with white irregular marks, cardiac mark light brown. Abdomen ventrally light yellow with few white irregular marks (Fig.
Oecobius przewalskyi Hu & Li, 1987 from Shigatse: A Left male palp, prolateral view; B Same, ventral view; C Same, retrolateral view; D Habitus in dorsal view, male; E Same, female. Abbreviations: E‒embolus, EA‒embolic apophysis, TA‒tegular apophysis, TL I‒tegular lobe I. Scale bars: 0.1 mm (A‒C), 1 mm (D‒E).
Palp as in diagnosis. Embolus (E) short and small, located in the median of bulb in ventral view and bent prolaterally; tegular apophysis (TA) four-branched, upper branch strongly sclerotic, with curled end and an outside tip, median branch small and rounded, two lower branches horn-like; embolic apophysis (EA) point to upward side of bulb and with serrated margin, dorsal embolic apophysis (EA) covered; tegular lobe I (TL I) large and thick, with two apophyses, upper apophysis pointed and lower apophysis rounded (Fig.
Female: Total length 3.40. Carapace 1.03 long, 1.20 wide. Abdomen 2.57 long, 1.59 wide. Diameters of eyes: AME 0.08, ALE 0.07, PME 0.06, PLE 0.06. Interdistances of eyes: AME‒AME 0.10, AME‒ALE 0.04, PME‒PME 0.10, PME‒PLE 0.02, AME‒PME 0.01, ALE‒PLE 0.02. Measurements of legs: I 4.05 (1.24, 0.28, 0.93, 0.88, 0.72), II 4.44 (1.30, 0.37, 1.04, 1.02, 0.71), III 4.41 (1.28, 0.33, 1.01, 1.10, 0.69), IV 4.58 (1.30, 0.38, 1.09, 1.21, 0.60). Leg formula: IV-II-III-I. Colouration as in male, except cardiac mark dark brown, abdomen ventrally light yellow with white irregular marks (Fig.
Copulatory organ as in diagnosis. Epigyne without process and scape. Copulatory openings (CO) located in posterior side; copulatory ducts (CD) visible in ventral view; vulva with wrinkles in posterior side, left copulatory duct (CD) pointing to 1 o'clock; spermathecae (Sp) oval and membranous, located in anterior side (Fig.
Oecobius przewalskyi Hu & Li, 1987 female from Shigatse: A Epigyne, ventral view; B Vulva, dorsal view; C Epigyne from the original paper, ventral view (
Male of Oecobius przewalskyi can be distinguished from other Oecobius species by 1. tegular apophysis (TA) four-branched, upper branch with curled end and an outside tip, median branch small and rounded, two lower branches horn-like; 2. embolic apophysis (EA) with serrated margin; 3. tegular lobe I (TL I) thick, with two apophyses, upper apophysis pointed and lower apophysis rounded (Fig.
Although we did not examine the type specimens of O. przewalskyi, the left copulatory duct (CD) which is pointing to 1 o'clock and the two oval spermathecae (Sp) shown in the original illustrations (Fig.
We thank Mr. Jian Chen for providing the information. We thank Mr. Fengxiang Liu for the spiders collection. We also thank Mr. Yanfeng Tong, Mr. Yejie Lin, Mr. Mike Skinner and an anonymous reviewer for their constructive comments. This research was funded by the National Natural Sciences Foundation of China (NSFC-32270495; NSFC-31970406; NSFC-31772420), the CAS Key Laboratory of Tropical Forest Ecology, Xishuangbanna Tropical of Botanical Garden, Chinese Academy of Sciences (19CAS-TFE-3) and the National Science & Technology Fundamental Resources Investigation Program of China (Grant No. 2019FY101800).