First genetic insights of Gonatodes caudiscutatus (Reptilia, Gekkota) in the Galapagos Islands and mainland Ecuador

Lía Altamirano-Ponce; Mateo Dávila-Játiva; Gabriela Pozo; María José Pozo; Martín Terán-Velástegui; Carlos Daniel Cadena; Diego Cisneros-Heredia; Maria de Lourdes Torres

doi:10.3897/BDJ.11.e113396

Biodiversity Data Journal : Research Article

PDF

Research Article

First genetic insights of Gonatodes caudiscutatus (Reptilia, Gekkota) in the Galapagos Islands and mainland Ecuador

Lía Altamirano-Ponce^‡,§, Mateo Dávila-Játiva^‡,|,¶,#, Gabriela Pozo^§, María José Pozo^§, Martín Terán-Velástegui^§, Carlos Daniel Cadena^¶, Diego F. Cisneros-Heredia^‡,|,#, Maria de Lourdes Torres^§,|,#

‡ Universidad San Francisco de Quito USFQ, Colegio de Ciencias Biológicas y Ambientales, Instituto de Biodiversidad Tropical IBIOTROP, Laboratorio de Zoología Terrestre, Quito, Ecuador

§ Universidad San Francisco de Quito USFQ, Colegio de Ciencias Biológicas y Ambientales, Laboratorio de Biotecnología Vegetal, Quito, Ecuador

| Universidad San Francisco de Quito USFQ, extensión Galápagos GAIAS, Puerto Baquerizo Moreno, San Cristóbal, Galápagos, Ecuador

¶ Universidad de los Andes, Departamento de Ciencias Biológicas, Laboratorio de Biología Evolutiva de Vertebrados, Bogotá, Colombia

# Galápagos Science Center, Universidad San Francisco de Quito USFQ & University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill UNC, Galápagos, Ecuador

Corresponding author: Maria de Lourdes Torres (ltorres@usfq.edu.ec)

Academic editor: Katharina Wollenberg Valero

Received: 27 Sep 2023 | Accepted: 01 Nov 2023 | Published: 16 Nov 2023

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Citation: Altamirano-Ponce L, Dávila-Játiva M, Pozo G, Pozo MJ, Terán-Velástegui M, Cadena CD, Cisneros-Heredia DF, Torres ML (2023) First genetic insights of Gonatodes caudiscutatus (Reptilia, Gekkota) in the Galapagos Islands and mainland Ecuador. Biodiversity Data Journal 11: e113396. https://doi.org/10.3897/BDJ.11.e113396

Abstract

Studies on genetic variability amongst native and introduced species contribute to a better understanding of the genetic diversity of species along their autochthonous distribution and identify possible routes of introduction. Gonatodes caudiscutatus is a gecko native to western Ecuador and introduced to the Galapagos Islands. Despite being a successful species in human-modified habitats along its native and non-native ranges, neither the colonisation process nor the genetic diversity of this gecko is known. In this study, we analysed 55 individuals from 14 localities in western Ecuador and six localities in San Cristobal Island, Galapagos — the only island with a large, self-sustaining population. We amplified and analysed the genetic variability of two nuclear genes (Cmos and Rag2) and one mitochondrial gene (16S). Cmos and Rag2 sequences presented little to none genetic variability, while 16S allowed us to build a haplotype network. We identified nine haplotypes across mainland Ecuador, two of which are also present in Galapagos. Low genetic diversity between insular and continental populations suggests that the introduction of G. caudiscutatus on the Islands is relatively recent. Due to the widespread geographical distribution of mainland haplotypes, it was not possible to determine the source population of the introduction. This study represents the first exploration of the genetic diversity of Gonatodes caudiscutatus, utilising genetic tools to gain insights into its invasion history in the Galapagos.

Keywords

introduced species, genetic variability, haplotype, gecko, Gonatodes caudiscutatus, Galapagos Islands, Ecuador

Introduction

Human-mediated introductions of non-native species are a common and well-documented phenomenon, exponentially increasing in our globalised world (Kraus 2009a, Seebens et al. 2017). Human-introduced species tend to thrive in insular and mainland coastal ecosystems to the point of displacing their native ecological counterparts (Hoskin 2011, Michaelides et al. 2019). Extensive research has been conducted to explore contemporary biological invasions, identifying the underlying mechanisms driving them and evaluating their impacts (Dame and Petren 2006, Yoshida et al. 2007, Keller and Taylor 2008, Yang et al. 2011). Genetic information from non-native and native populations of invasive species can help identify possible invasion routes and mechanisms and, thus, develop better conservation management tools to mitigate the impact of invasive species (Sakai et al. 2001, Kolbe et al. 2004, Abdelkrim et al. 2005, Frankham 2009, Peh 2009, Lu et al. 2020). Recent investigations of human-mediated introductions of lizards have shown a diversity of dynamic processes involved, including marginal reductions in genetic diversity and shifts in haplotype frequencies due to admixture of genotypes from different source populations, multiple introductions, large numbers of founding individuals, gene flow, natural selection and hybridisation (Kolbe et al. 2004, Kolbe et al. 2008, Schulte et al. 2012, Detwiler and Criscione 2014, Moule et al. 2015).

Geckos (infraorder Gekkota) are some of the most successful colonisers of novel areas amongst terrestrial vertebrate taxa. Many species in this group have established thriving non-native populations on oceanic islands (Lever 2003, Gamble et al. 2008, Kraus 2009b). Human-mediated range expansions of geckos have mostly occurred through cargo shippments, allowing their successful establishment on distant islands (Garman 1892, Case 1975, Olmedo and Cayot 1994, Lever 2003, Gamble et al. 2008, Parent et al. 2008, Kraus 2009b, Hoskin 2011, Sturaro and Avila-Pires 2013, Silva-Rocha et al. 2019). Most research regarding invasive geckos has focused on nocturnal species of the family Gekkonidae due to their extensive presence throughout island ecosystems and their adverse effects on native fauna, for example, the common house gecko Hemidactylus frenatus Duméril & Bibron, 1836 (Lever 2003, Jesus et al. 2005, Gamble et al. 2008, Kraus 2009b, Hoskin 2011, Torres-Carvajal 2015). Although several species of the diurnal family Sphaerodactylidae have also established non-native populations, they have been less studied, possibly due to their comparatively restricted geographical expansions, smaller body size and less evident ecological impact (Lever 2003, Kraus 2009b).

Gonatodes is a genus of small neotropical sphaerodactylid geckos with strong sexual dimorphism (Vanzolini 1968, Gamble et al. 2007). At least four out of the 33 species of Gonatodes are known to have successfully established populations outside of their native range: G. albogularis (Duméril and Bibron 1836), G. antillensis (Lidth de Jeude 1887), G. caudiscutatus (Günther 1859) and G. vittatus (Lichtenstein 1856) (Kraus 2009b). Gonatodes caudiscutatus is native to the Pacific lowlands and western foothills of the Andes in Ecuador and northern Peru, between 0 and 1800 m elevation (Peters and Donoso-Barros 1970, Carvajal-Campos and Torres-Carvajal 2012, Sturaro and Avila-Pires 2013). Non-native populations of G. caudiscutatus have established in the Galapagos Archipelago and on the eastern Andean slopes and Amazonian foothills of Ecuador due to human-mediated transoceanic and transmountain extra-range dispersions (Vanzolini 1965, Wright 1983, Hoogmoed 1989, Olmedo and Cayot 1994, Carvajal-Campos and Torres-Carvajal 2012, Sturaro and Avila-Pires 2013, Cisneros-Heredia 2018). Gonatodes caudiscutatus probably reached Galapagos as cargo stowaway on ships departing from ports along coastal Ecuador over the last two centuries and was first reported in San Cristóbal Island in 1891 (Olmedo and Cayot 1994, Cisneros-Heredia 2018). Nowadays, the species has established large populations in the highlands of San Cristóbal Island and smaller populations in the urban lowlands of San Cristóbal, ocurrences have been reported in Isabela, Baltra and Santa Cruz islands with no evidence of a stablished populations, but it is worth noting that this might be due to a lack of sampling efforts in these islands (Garman 1892, Wood 1939, Mertens 1963, Wright 1983, Hoogmoed 1989, Olmedo and Cayot 1994, Lundh 1998, Jiménez-Uzcátegui et al. 2007, Cisneros-Heredia 2018, Oleas Paz and Cisneros-Heredia 2019, Ramos Rojas and Cisneros-Heredia 2019, Ramos Rojas et al. 2020, Martínez Gómez and Cisneros-Heredia 2021).

There are no studies about the colonisation process of G. caudiscutatus in the Galapagos Islands and, in general, little is known about the species beyond its general morphology and distribution (Vanzolini 1968, Sturaro and Avila-Pires 2013). In contrast, the colonisation processes of the nocturnal, invasive gecko H. frenatus in Galapagos have been traced using molecular data, providing evidence of probable colonisation routes and points of origin (Torres-Carvajal 2015, Martins et al. 2022). These studies have contributed to a better understanding of the colonisation routes of small terrestrial vertebrates reaching islands as stowaways, a mechanism that has become more common over the last decade in Galapagos (Cisneros-Heredia 2018).

Across the globe, most species of introduced herpetofauna are understudied (Kraus 2009a) and genetic data for such species in the Galapagos are limited (Torres and Mena 2018). To develop better management and control tools for conservation in the Islands, it is essential to determine the most probable invasion routes, which requires knowledge of the genetic composition of the introduced species and their connections with the source populations (Chaves 2018). This study provides the first molecular insights into the genetic diversity of G. caudiscutatus along its native range in western Ecuador and about its introduction to the Galapagos Islands.

Materials and methods

Study area

We surveyed 34 localities across the native range of G. caudiscutatus in mainland Ecuador and 12 localities in San Cristóbal Island, Galapagos Archipelago (Suppl. material 1). Site selection was based on the known distribution of G. caudiscutatus (Wright 1983, Hoogmoed 1989, Olmedo and Cayot 1994, Carvajal-Campos and Torres-Carvajal 2012, Sturaro and Avila-Pires 2013, Torres-Carvajal et al. 2016, Cisneros-Heredia 2018, Pazmiño-Otamendi and Carvajal-Campos 2019) and previous fieldwork conducted by the Laboratory of Terrestrial Zoology of Universidad San Francisco de Quito USFQ between 2008 and 2018. Localities in western mainland Ecuador covered all known ecosystems where G. caudiscutatus has been reported in six Provinces (Esmeraldas, Bolívar, Manabí, Santo Domingo, Guayas, Los Ríos), including urban/periurban green areas in dry and humid lowlands and forested areas in dry, mesic and humid highlands. Localities in San Cristóbal Island covered ecosystems preferred by non-native populations of G. caudiscutatus, including urban/periurban green areas in the dry lowlands and agricultural and forested areas in the humid highlands.

Data collection

Fieldwork was carried out in June–July 2019 in Galapagos and August- September 2019 in mainland Ecuador. Two researchers exhaustively searched for geckos at each locality for approximately 3 hours during the daytime, carefully looking under rocks, logs, rubble and other debris. Geckos were captured by hand and euthanised with benzocaine. Tail muscle samples were preserved in 90% ethanol and stored at −20°C until used and analysed at the Plant Biotechnology Lab of Universidad San Francisco de Quito USFQ. Voucher specimens were fixed in formalin and preserved in ethanol 70%. Specimens are deposited in the Zoology Museum at Universidad San Francisco de Quito, Quito, Ecuador (ZSFQ) under collection codes specified in Suppl. material 6. Insular specimens are currently kept under study at the Laboratory of Terrestrial Zoology of Universidad San Francisco de Quito USFQ. Upon completion of studies, we will deposit the specimens in a biological collection in the Galapagos Islands, following requirements by the Directorate of the Galapagos National Park and the Ministry of Environment of Ecuador. In the case of 10 samples specified in Suppl. material 6, the specimens escaped after releasing their tails. We sampled 56 individuals of G. caudiscutatus across all surveyed localities (Suppl. material 2).

DNA extraction and amplification

Cell lysis was performed following the protocol described by Carranza et al. (1999). Tail tissue (0.5 cm) was macerated with sterilised plastic pistils and then incubated in a proteinase K digestion solution. Genomic DNA was extracted using a standard phenol/chloroform protocol (Kant and Coleman 2012). DNA concentration and quality were assessed using a Nanodrop 1000 Spectrophotometer and visualised in a 1.5% agarose gel. Each DNA sample was diluted to obtain a final concentration of 20 ng/µl. PCR was used to amplify fragments of the mitochondrial 16S rRNA gene (417 bp) and two coding nuclear genes: oocyte-maturation factor MOS (Cmos) (415 bp) and recombination activating gene 2 (Rag2) (410 bp). PCR amplification protocols established by Lobos (2013) and Gamble et al. (2008) were used with modifications specified in Suppl. material 3. Sequencing was commercially performed by Macrogen Inc. (Seoul, Korea).

Sequence analyses

Sequence cleaning and aligning were performed using Geneious Prime 2020.0.5 software under default parameters. In order to assess genetic differentiation and genealogical relationships amongst G. caudiscutatus populations from San Cristóbal Island and mainland Ecuador, we built two trees using the three concatenated genes. The first tree was built using the Bayesian Inference (BI9 model under the default parameters in the Geneious Tree Builder option using Geneious Prime 2020.0.5 software (Biomatters 2020). The second tree was built using the Maximum Likelihood (ML) model on the IQ-tree online server (Trifinopoulos et al. 2016). We used ModelFinder (Kalyaanamoorthy et al. 2017) with 1000 bootstraps to determine the best-fit model. However, as both trees proved to be uninformative, they were removed from the study. Relationships amongst 16S haplotypes were assessed by constructing a haplotype median-joining network in PopArt1.7 (Leigh and Bryant 2015). We characterised the genetic variability of G. caudiscutatus using insular and mainland populations as operational geographic units by calculating nucleotide diversity (Pi) and haplotype diversity (Hd) in DNASP v.6 settings using default parameters (Rozas et al. 2017). A map was built using ArcGIS Pro (ESRI 2016) to show the haplotype distribution.

Data resources

The GenBank accession numbers for the new sequences are MZ434825-MZ434876 for 16S sequences and MZ594479-MZ594565 for Cmos and Rag2.

Results

We found individuals in 32 out of the 46 sampled sites and obtained sequence data of Rag2 for 40 individuals, of Cmos for 47 individuals and of 16S for 52 individuals. 16S sequences varied considerably (overall mean genetic distance of 24.31), but there were few differences in Cmos (overall mean genetic distance of 0.41) and no variation in Rag2 (overall mean genetic distance of 0). The results of the overall mean genetic distance for each gene and the genetic pairwise distances between all individuals for each gene can be found in Suppl. material 4. The 52 sequences of the 16S region corresponded to 33 individuals from 14 localities throughout western Ecuador and 19 individuals from San Cristobal Island. Given that the nuclear markers were not informative, we only used 16S to assess haplotype diversity and genealogical relationships.

16S sequences showed 21 variable sites in the 403 base-pair region (Fig. 1). Nine haplotypes were found across all studied populations (Suppl. material 5) and the overall haplotype diversity was 0.7541. Mainland populations showed higher haplotype diversity (Hd) and nucleotide diversity (Pi) than San Cristobal populations (Mainland: Hd = 0.852 and Pi = 0.02135; San Cristobal Hd = 0.485 and Pi = 0.01516). Two major clusters separated by the highest number of mutations can be identified in the haplotype network (Fig. 1), each including haplotypes found both on the mainland and in the Galapagos.

Figure 1.

Haplotype network showing haplotypes found in mainland Ecuador (blue) and the Galapagos Island (green). Haplotype numbers correspond to those presented in Table 1 and Suppl. Material 5.

Table 1.

Download as

CSV

XLSX

Abundance and geographical distribution of haplotypes found in this study. Locality data are available in Suppl. material 1.

		Haplotypes
Province	Locality	1	2	3	4	5	6	7	8	9
Esmeraldas	Acantilado	2
Esmeraldas	Esmeraldas City				3			1
Bolivar	Caluma				1	2
Guayas	Cerro Blanco									5
	Bucay						1
	Pantanal Zoo	1		1						2
Manabí	Agua Blanca		4
Manabí	Pto. Lopez				2
Sto. Domingo	Santo Domingo City	3			2		1
Los Ríos	Quevedo	1							1
San Cristobal	Highlands	3			8
San Cristobal	Lowlands	2			6
Total		12	4	1	22	2	2	1	1	7

Haplotypes 1 and 4 were found widely throughout mainland Ecuador and are the only haplotypes found in the samples of San Cristóbal (Fig. 2, Table 1). Haplotypes 2 and 9 are more genetically distant from all other haplotypes by the number of mutations per site (Fig. 1, Suppl. material 5). These most diverging haplotypes are found in individuals from two populations in western Ecuador (Cerro Blanco and Agua Blanca), the only surveyed localities covered by old-growth seasonal deciduous lowland dry forests.

Figure 2.

Genetic variation in surveyed populations of G. caudiscutatus. Pie chart colours correspond to haplotypes found in each locality. Numbers correspond to haplotypes detailed in Table 1. Pie charts represent the proportion of haplotypes found at each locality. Locality data are available in Suppl. material 2.

Discussion

This study presents the first insights into the genetic diversity of native and introduced populations of G caudiscutatus in mainland and insular Ecuador. A total of nine haplotypes were found along the native range of G. caudiscutatus in western Ecuador. We found low nucleotide diversity values in mainland sites, with minor differences amongst populations. However, haplotype diversity was high; six haplotypes were unique to specific sampling locations, but their distribution did not correspond to any discernible biogeographic pattern. High haplotype diversity values have been reported for other Gonatodes that inhabit complex geographic ranges (Avila-Pires et al. 2012). The diverse orogenic and ecosystemic patterns of western Ecuador have been identified as an important factor driving genetic diversity in several clades (Willmott et al. 2001, Ron et al. 2006, Chaves et al. 2007, Waddell et al. 2018, Cisneros-Heredia et al. 2023). The unique haplotypes correspond to the only sampling localities in natural areas (Agua Blanca and Cerro Blanco), with all other haplotypes found in urban or periurban areas. As genetic, environmental and phenotypic variations are frequently geographically structured (Kaliontzopoulou et al. 2018), we suggest exploring how populations of those two localities differ in variables like morphology and behaviour from other populations of G. caudiscutatus across other natural and human-made habitats.

Two haplotypes were found on San Cristóbal Island, but none is exclusive to Galapagos and represent a small portion of the haplotype diversity from the mainland. Our analyses could not provide concrete evidence about the origin of the introduced populations of G. caudiscutatus in the Galapagos because there was no discernible genetic structure in the mainland: both island haplotypes were scattered throughout western Ecuador (Fig. 2). The presence of only two of the nine mainland haplotypes in the Islands could be attributed to a case of founder effect, where a small portion of the genetic pool of the mainland's population arrived to the Island with the colonising individuals, resulting in a less diverse genetic pool in insular populations. It is possible that, upon arrival, little genetic changes occurred, facilitated by the broad ecological tolerance the species showed on its native distribution and the similar environmental conditions shared between the native and introduced habitats, inhibiting further genetic diversification (Lee 2002). Furthermore, time since colonisation may be insufficient for genetic differences to accumulate in the specific markers under study (Chaves 2018).

Loss of genetic variation in introduced population due to bottlenecks during introductions has been reported to compromise the ability of populations to adapt to novel areas and limit their viability (Lee 2002, Kolbe et al. 2004). The low genetic diversity found in samples of G. caudiscutatus in the Galapagos may be related to its limited distribution in the Archipelago. The species has been present in the Galapagos Islands for about 130 years, but remains restricted to moist environments where it also shows considerable population fluctuations (Cisneros-Heredia 2018). Similarly, House Gecko, Hemidactylus frenatus, arrived to Galapagos about 12 years ago and has haplotypes identical to those from its source populations (Melanesia) (Torres-Carvajal 2015); however, H. frenatus has become widespread and with increasing populations across most human-populated islands in Galapagos (Oleas Paz and Cisneros-Heredia 2019, Ramos Rojas et al. 2020, Martínez Gómez and Cisneros-Heredia 2021). Despite both species being in the order Gekkota, their invasion ecology shows significant differences that deserve further study.

Extra-range records of G. caudiscutatus are recurrently reported in mainland Ecuador and Galapagos, suggesting that the species may eventually hold a larger potential for colonisation of different lowland ecosystems (Sturaro and Avila-Pires 2013, Cisneros-Heredia 2018). This study is the first approach to describing the genetic diversity of insular and continental populations of G. caudiscutatus. Future studies with genomic tools could help to elucidate the dispersal history and genetic composition of G. caudiscutatus and other introduced geckos and small vertebrates in Galapagos and mainland Ecuador (Jesus et al. 2005, Rato et al. 2011, Avila-Pires et al. 2012, Pinto et al. 2018). This information could potentially help the development of strategies to prevent new colonisation events of geckos and other small terrestrial animals in the Archipelago, focusing on the points of origin and arrival and controlling colonisation routes (Allendorf et al. 2010, Chaves 2018, DeWoody et al. 2021).

Acknowledgements

We thank Camila Piñeiros for her support during fieldwork; Emilia Peñaherrera for her help with the map; Giovanny Sarigu who allowed us to carry out field research at Hacienda La Tranquila; Carlos Mena, Diego Quiroga, Steve Walsh, Sofía Tacle, Cecibel Narváez, Anita Carrión, Sylvia and Jessenia Sotamba, Cristina Vintimilla, Máximo and Marlene Ochoa and all the personnel from the Galapagos Science Center GSC (Universidad San Francisco de Quito USFQ and University of North Carolina at Chapel-Hill UNC) and Universidad San Francisco de Quito, Galapagos extension — GAIAS for their constant support and help; the Galapagos National Park Directorate, including all authorities and park rangers of the Galapagos National Park for their valuable comments during project proposal reviews and support with logistics and transportation to the sampling sites; Carolina Reyes-Puig, David Brito, Catalina Palacios, Fabian Salgado-Roa, Julian Peña and all members of the USFQ Plant Biotechnology Laboratory, USFQ Terrestrial Zoology Laboratory and the Laboratorio de Biología Evolutiva de Vertebrados, Departamento de Ciencias Biológicas of Universidad de los Andes (Bogotá, Colombia) for their technical assistance, guidance, support and access to equipment, labs and other facilities; and the members of the Lab of Life in San Cristóbal, Comunidad Agua Blanca in Manabí and Bosque Protector Río Blanco in Guayaquil, Villa Colombia hostel in Manabi for allowing us to do research in their territories. Our work was possible thanks to Galapagos POA Grants provided by the GSC, COCIBA Grants provided by the Colegio de Ciencias Biológicas y Ambientales COCIBA–USFQ, Fondos Semilla grant provided by the Facultad de Ciencias at Universidad de los Andes Colombia and all the supporters of the Experiment.com crowdfunding campaign (experiment.com/geckos). Research permits (PC-59-19, 019-2018-IC-FAU-DNB/MAE) and framework contracts for access to genetic resources (MAE-DNB-CM-2018-0106) were issued by the Galapagos National Park Directorate, Ministry of Environment of Ecuador. All applicable international and national guidelines for the care and use of animals were followed in accordance with the Ministry of Environment of Ecuador permit 019-2018-IC-FAU-DNB/MAE.

Conflicts of interest

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

References

Abdelkrim J, Pascal M, Calmet C, Samadi S (2005)

Importance of assessing population genetic structure before eradication of invasive species: Examples from insular Norway rat populations

Conservation Biology

(

1509

‑

1518

. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1523-1739.2005.00206.x

Allendorf F, Hohenlohe P, Luikart G (2010)

Genomics and the future of conservation genetics

Nature Reviews Genetics

(

697

‑

709

. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrg2844

Avila-Pires TS, Mulcahy D, Werneck F, Sites JW (2012)

Phylogeography of the teiid lizard Kentropyx calcarata and the Sphaerodactylid Gonatodes humeralis (Reptilia: Squamata): Testing a geological scenario for the lower Amazon–Tocantins asins, Amazonia, Brazil

Herpetologica

(

). https://doi.org/10.1655/herpetologica-d-11-00021.1

Biomatters (2020)

Geneious Prime

2020.0.5

. URL: https://www.geneious.com

Carranza S, Arnold EN, Thomas R, Mateo JA, López-Jurado LF (1999)

Status of the extinct giant lacertid lizard Gallotia simonyi simonyi (Reptilia: Lacertidae) assessed using mtDNA sequences from museum specimens

Herpetological Journal

‑

. URL: https://accedacris.ulpgc.es/bitstream/10553/18391/1/0641102_00000_0000.pdf

Carvajal-Campos A, Torres-Carvajal O (2012)

Gonatodes caudiscutatus (Günther, 1859) (Squamata: Sphaerodactylidae): distribution extension in Ecuador

Check List

(

). https://doi.org/10.15560/8.3.525

Case T (1975)

Species numbers, density compensation, and colonizing ability of lizards on islands in the Gulf of California

Ecology

(

‑

. https://doi.org/10.2307/1935296

Chaves J, Pollinger J, Smith T, LeBuhn G (2007)

The role of geography and ecology in shaping the phylogeography of the speckled hummingbird (Adelomyia melanogenys) in Ecuador

Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution

(

795

‑

807

. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ympev.2006.11.006

Chaves J (2018)

Genetic consequences of invasive species in the Galapagos Islands

Understanding Invasive Species in the Galapagos Islands

‑

. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-67177-2_2

Cisneros-Heredia D (2018)

The hitchhiker wave: non-native small terrestrial vertebrates in the Galapagos

Understanding Invasive Species in the Galapagos Islands

‑

139

. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-67177-2_7

Cisneros-Heredia D, Yánez-Muñoz M, Sánchez-Nivicela J, Ron S (2023)

Two new syntopic species of glassfrogs (Amphibia, Centrolenidae, Centrolene) from the southwestern Andes of Ecuador

PeerJ

https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.15195

Dame E, Petren K (2006)

Behavioural mechanisms of invasion and displacement in Pacific island geckos (Hemidactylus)

Animal Behaviour

(

1165

‑

1173

. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2005.10.009

Detwiler J, Criscione C (2014)

Recently introduced invasive geckos quickly reach population genetic equilibrium dynamics

Biological Invasions

(

2653

‑

2667

. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10530-014-0694-1

DeWoody JA, Harder A, Mathur S, Willoughby J (2021)

The long‐standing significance of genetic diversity in conservation

Molecular Ecology

(

4147

‑

4154

. https://doi.org/10.1111/mec.16051

Duméril AMC, Bibron G (1836)

Erpetologie Générale ou Histoire Naturelle Complete des Reptiles

. [

General herpetology and complete natural history of reptiles

Encyclopédique Roret

Paris

528

pp. [In

French

Frankham R (2009)

Where are we in conservation genetics and where do we need to go?

Conservation Genetics

(

661

‑

663

. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10592-009-0010-2

Gamble T, Bauer A, Greenbaum E, Jackman T (2007)

Evidence for Gondwanan vicariance in an ancient clade of gecko lizards

Journal of Biogeography

‑

107

. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2699.2007.01770.x

Gamble T, Bauer AM, Greenbaum E, Jackman TR (2008)

Out of the blue: a novel, trans-Atlantic clade of geckos (Gekkota, Squamata)

Zoologica Scripta

(

355

‑

366

. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1463-6409.2008.00330.x

Garman S (1892)

The reptiles of the Galapagos Islands. From the collections of Dr. Geo. Baur

Bulletin of the Essex Institute.

‑

. https://doi.org/10.5962/bhl.part.18576

Günther A (1859)

Second list of cold-blooded vertebrata collected by Mr. Fraser in the Andes of Western Ecuador

Proceedings of Zoology Socierty of Lodo

402

‑

Hoogmoed M (1989)

Introduced geckos in Puerto Ayora, Santa Cruz, with remarks on other areas

Noticias de Galapagos

‑

. URL: http://aquaticcommons.org/5766/1/NG_47_1989_Hoogmoed_Introduced_geckos.pdf

Hoskin C (2011)

The invasion and potential impact of the Asian house gecko (Hemidactylus frenatus) in Australia

Austral Ecology

(

240

‑

251

. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1442-9993.2010.02143.x

Jesus J, Brehm A, Harris DJ (2005)

Phylogenetic relationships of Hemidactylus geckos from the Gulf of Guinea islands: patterns of natural colonizations and anthropogenic introductions estimated from mitochondrial and nuclear DNA sequences

Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution

(

480

‑

485

. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ympev.2004.11.006

Jiménez-Uzcátegui G, Carrión V, Zabala J, Buitrón P, Milstead B (2007)

Status of Introduced vertebrates in Galapagos.

In: Cayot L (Ed.)

Galapagos Report 2006–2007

Charles Darwin Foundation

Puerto Ayora

136–141

pp.

Kaliontzopoulou A, Pinho C, Martínez-Freiría F (2018)

Where does diversity come from? Linking geographical patterns of morphological, genetic, and environmental variation in wall lizards

BMC Evolutionary Biology

(

). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12862-018-1237-7

Kalyaanamoorthy S, Minh BQ, Wong TKF, von Haeseler A, Jermiin LS (2017)

ModelFinder: fast model selection for accurate phylogenetic estimates

Nature Methods

(

587

‑

589

. https://doi.org/10.1038/nmeth.4285

Kant S, Coleman N (2012)

DNA purification via phenol/chloroform

The Univesity of Sydney

. URL: https://www.sydney.edu.au/science/molecular_bioscience/ohs/documents/sop/SOP_SMB_012.2_DNA_purification_using_phenol-chloroform_SK_NC_0315.pdf

Keller S, Taylor D (2008)

History, chance and adaptation during biological invasion: separating stochastic phenotypic evolution from response to selection

Ecology Letters

(

852

‑

866

. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1461-0248.2008.01188.x

Kolbe J, Glor R, Rodríguez Schettino L, Lara AC, Larson A, Losos J (2004)

Genetic variation increases during biological invasion by a Cuban lizard

Nature

431

(

7005

177

‑

181

. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature02807

Kolbe JJ, Larson A, Losos JB, de Queiroz K (2008)

Admixture determines genetic diversity and population differentiation in the biological invasion of a lizard species

Biology Letters

(

434

‑

437

. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsbl.2008.0205

Kraus F (2009a)

Global Trends in Alien Reptiles and Amphibians

. In: Genovesi P, Scalera R (Eds)

Aliens: The Invasive Species ulletin

Rome, Italy

13-18

pp.

Kraus F (2009b)

Alien Reptiles and Amphibians: a scientific compendium and analysis, Invading nature

Springer series in Invasion Ecology

Vol. 4

Springer

New York

. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-8946-6

Lee CE (2002)

Evolutionary genetics of invasive species

Trends in Ecology & Evolution

(

386

‑

391

. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0169-5347(02)02554-5

Leigh J, Bryant D (2015)

popart: full‐feature software for haplotype network construction

Methods in Ecology and Evolution

(

1110

‑

1116

. https://doi.org/10.1111/2041-210x.12410

Lever C (2003)

Naturalized reptiles and amphibians of the world.

Oxford University Press

(

. https://doi.org/10.1086/421639

Lichtenstein H (1856)

Nomenclator reptilium et amphibiorum musei zoologici Berolinensis : Namenverzeichnis der in der zoologischen Sammlung der Koeniglichen Universität zu Berlin aufgestellten Arten von Reptilien und Amphibien nach ihren Ordnungen, Familien und Gattungen

. [

Nomenclator reptilium et amphibiorum musei zoologicali Berolinensis: List of names of the species of reptiles and amphibians in the zoological collection of the Royal University of Berlin according to their orders, families and genera

Royal Academy Printing Office of the sciences.

Berlin

Lidth de Jeude TW (1887)

On a collection of reptiles and fishes from the West-Indies. Notes from the Leyden Museum

Notes from the Leyden Museum

129

‑

139

Lobos S (2013)

Sistemática molecular de las lagartijas del género Alopoglossus (Autarchoglossa: Gymnophthalmidae) en el Ecuador

Pontificia Universidad Católica DelEcuador

URL: http://repositorio.puce.edu.ec/handle/22000/5830

Lu G, Wang C, Zhao J, Liao X, Wang J, Luo M, Zhu L, Bernatzhez L, Li S (2020)

Evolution and genetics of bighead and silver carps: Native population conservation versus invasive species control

Evolutionary Applications

(

1351

‑

1362

. https://doi.org/10.1111/eva.12982

Lundh J (1998)

Insiduous invaders

Noticias de Galápagos

‑

Martínez Gómez JS, Cisneros-Heredia DF (2021)

Comparación de la ecofisiología de gecos endémicos e introducidos en la isla San Cristóbal, Galápagos.

[

Comparison of the ecophysiology of endemic and introduced geckos on San Cristóbal Island, Galapagos.

Universidad San Francisco de Quito, Ecuador.

Martins B, Silva-Rocha I, Mata V, Gonçalves Y, Rocha R, Rato C (2022)

Trophic interactions of an invasive gecko in an endemic-rich oceanic island: Insights using DNA metabarcoding

Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution

https://doi.org/10.3389/fevo.2022.1044230

Mertens R (1963)

Die wiederentdeckung der geckonengattung Gonatodes auf den Galapagos.

Senckenbergiana. Biologia

‑

Michaelides S, Gilbert N, Smith B, White G, Hailey A, Kolbe J (2019)

Genetic reconstruction of the invasion history of Anolis wattsi in Trinidad with a comment on the importance of ecological similarity to invasion success

Herpetological Journal

131

‑

137

. https://doi.org/10.33256/hj29.3.131137

Moule H, Chaplin K, Bray R, Miller K, Thompson M, Chapple D (2015)

A matter of time: Temporal variation in the introduction history and population genetic structuring of an invasive lizard

Current Zoology

(

456

‑

464

. https://doi.org/10.1093/czoolo/61.3.456

Oleas Paz MP, Cisneros-Heredia DF (2019)

Spatial distribution and microhabitat use of species of geckos in San Cristobal Island, Galapagos.

Universidad San Francisco de Quito, Ecuador

Olmedo J, Cayot LJ (1994)

Introduced geckos in the towns of Santa Cruz, San Cristóbal and Isabela

Noticias de Galápagos

(

)

‑

Parent CE, Caccone A, Petren K (2008)

Colonization and diversification of Galápagos terrestrial fauna: a phylogenetic and biogeographical synthesis

Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences

363

(

1508

3347

‑

3361

. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2008.0118

Pazmiño-Otamendi G, Carvajal-Campos A (2019)

Gonatodes caudiscutatus. In: Torres-Carvajal O, Pazmiño-Otamendi G, Salazar-Valenzuela D (Eds) Reptiles del Ecuador. Version 2019.0. Museo de Zoología, Pontificia Universidad Católica del Ecuador.

https://bioweb.bio/faunaweb/reptiliaweb/FichaEspecie/Gonatodes%20caudiscutatus. Accessed on: 2021-1-07.

Peh K- (2009)

Invasive species in Southeast Asia: the knowledge so far

Biodiversity and Conservation

(

1083

‑

1099

. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-009-9755-7

Peters JA, Donoso-Barros R (1970)

Catalogue of the neotropical squamata pt. II: lizards and amphisbaenians

Bulletin of the United States National Museum

297

‑

293

. https://doi.org/10.5479/si.03629236.297.1

Pinto BJ, Colli GR, Higham TE, Russell AP, Scantlebury DP, Vitt LJ, Gamble T (2018)

Population genetic structure and species delimitation of a widespread, Neotropical dwarf gecko.

Molecular Phylogenetics and volution

133

‑

. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ympev.2018.12.029

Ramos Rojas S, Reyes-Puig C, Cisneros-Heredia DF (2020)

Seis especies de gecos en una isla icónica ¿cómo viven las especies endémicas e introducidas?

Archivos Académicos USFQ

(

Ramos Rojas SA, Cisneros-Heredia DF (2019)

Morfología comparada y ecología de las comunidades de gecos en la isla San Cristóbal, Galápagos y el continente ecuatoriano.

[

Comparative morphology and ecology of gecko communities on San Cristóbal Island, Galapagos, and the Ecuadorian mainland.

Universidad San Francisco de Quito, Ecuador.

Rato C, Carranza S, Harris DJ (2011)

When selection deceives phylogeographic interpretation: The case of the Mediterranean house gecko, Hemidactylus turcicus (Linnaeus, 1758)

Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution

(

365

‑

373

. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ympev.2010.12.004

Ron S, Santos J, Cannatella D (2006)

Phylogeny of the túngara frog genus Engystomops (Physalaemus pustulosus species group; Anura: Leptodactylidae)

Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution

(

392

‑

403

. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ympev.2005.11.022

Rozas J, Ferrer-Mata A, Sánchez-DelBarrio JC, Guirao-Rico S, Librado P, Ramos-Onsins SE, Sánchez-Gracia A (2017)

DnaSP 6: DNA sequence polymorphism analysis of large data sets.

Molecular Biology and Evolution

(

3299

‑

3302

. https://doi.org/10.1093/molbev/msx248

Sakai AK, Allendorf FW, Holt JS, Lodge DM, Molofsky J, With KA, Weller SG (2001)

The population biology of invasive species.

Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics

(

305

‑

332

. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.32.081501.114037

Schulte U, Gassert F, Geniez P, Veith M, Hochkirch A (2012)

Origin and genetic diversity of an introduced wall lizard population and its cryptic congener

Amphibia-Reptilia

(

129

‑

140

. https://doi.org/10.1163/156853812x626160

Seebens H, Blackburn TM, Dyer EE, Genovesi P, Hulme PE, Jeschke JM, Pagad S, Pyšek P, Winter M, Arianoutsou M, Bacher S, Blasius B, Brundu G, Capinha C, Celesti-Grapow L, Dawson W, Dullinger S, Fuentes N, Jäger H, Kartesz J, Kenis M, Kreft H, Kühn I, Lenzner B, Liebhold A, Mosena A, Moser D, Nishino M, Pearman D, Pergl J, Rabitsch W, Rojas-Sandoval J, Roques A, Rorke S, Rossinelli S, Roy HE, Scalera R, Schindler S, Štajerová K, Tokarska-Guzik B, van Kleunen M, Walker K, Weigelt P, Yamanaka T, Essl F (2017)

No saturation in the accumulation of alien species worldwide.

Nature ommunications

14435

. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms14435

Silva-Rocha IR, Salvi D, Carretero M, Ficetola GF (2019)

Alien reptiles on Mediterranean Islands: A model for invasion biogeography

Diversity and Distributions

(

995

‑

1005

. https://doi.org/10.1111/ddi.12911

Sturaro MJ, Avila-Pires TS (2013)

Redescription of the gecko Gonatodes caudiscutatus (Günther, 1859) (Squamata: Sphaerodactylidae)

South American Journal of Herpetology

(

132

‑

145

. https://doi.org/10.2994/sajh-d-13-00002.1

Torres-Carvajal O (2015)

On the origin of South American populations of the common house gecko (Gekkonidae: Hemidactylus frenatus)

NeoBiota

‑

. https://doi.org/10.3897/neobiota.27.5437

Torres-Carvajal O, Rodríguez-Guerra A, Chaves J (2016)

Present diversity of Galápagos leaf-toed geckos (Phyllodactylidae: Phyllodactylus) stems from three independent colonization events

Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution

103

‑

. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ympev.2016.07.006

Torres M, Mena C (2018)

Understanding invasive species in the Galapagos islands. Social and ecological interactions in the Galapagos Islands

Springer, Cham.

Trifinopoulos J, Nguyen LT, Haeseler A, Minh BQ (2016)

W-IQ-TREE: a fast online phylogenetic tool for maximum likelihood analysis

Nucleic Acids Research

(

w232

‑

w235

. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkw256

Vanzolini P (1965)

On the Gonatodes of the Galapagos Islands (Sauria, Gekkonidae).

Papéis Avulsos de Zoologia

(

‑

Vanzolini PE (1968)

Geography of the South American Gekkonidae (Sauria)

Arquivos de Zoologia

(

). https://doi.org/10.11606/issn.2176-7793.v17i2p85-112

Waddell E, Crotti M, Lougheed S, Cannatella D, Elmer K (2018)

Hierarchies of evolutionary radiation in the world’s most species rich vertebrate group, the Neotropical Pristimantis leaf litter frogs

Taylor & Francis

(

807

‑

819

. https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.7145825.v2

Willmott K, Hall JW, Lamas G (2001)

Systematics of Hypanartia (Lepidoptera: Nymphalidae: Nymphalinae), with a test for geographical speciation mechanisms in the Andes

Systematic Entomology

(

369

‑

399

. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-3113.2001.00157.x

Wood G (1939)

Results of the Pinchot south sea expedition, III. Galapagos reptiles

Notulae Naturae

‑

Wright JW (1983)

The distribution and status of Gonatodes collaris in the Galapagos Archipelago

Herpetological Review

(

Yang D, González-Bernal E, Greenlees M, Shine R (2011)

Interactions between native and invasive gecko lizards in tropical Australia

Austral Ecology

(

592

‑

599

. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1442-9993.2011.02319.x

Yoshida T, Goka K, Ishihama F, Ishihara M, Kudo S (2007)

Biological invasion as a natural experiment of the evolutionary processes: introduction of the special feature

Ecological Research

(

849

‑

854

. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11284-007-0435-3

Supplementary materials

Suppl. material 1: Fieldwork locations

Authors: Lía Altamirano-Ponce, Mateo Dávila-Játiva

Data type: Localities information

Brief description:

Nomenclature, province and coordinates for each continental locality visited during this research along with the date at which the fieldwork was conducted there.

Download file (15.71 kb)

Suppl. material 2: Sample's information

Authors: Lía Altamirano-Ponce and Mateo Dávila-Játiva

Data type: Studied locations

Brief description:

This document contains geographical information for the Gonatodes caudiscutatus tissue samples used on this study, including codes, waypoints, provinces on mainland Ecuador and the Galapagos Islands and sex of the specimen.

Download file (13.31 kb)

Suppl. material 3: Sequencing primers and PCR conditions

Authors: Lía Altamirano-Ponce

Data type: Primers and PCR conditions

Brief description:

List of the sequencing primers and their respective PCR conditions (initial heating step, denaturation, annealing, extension and number of corresponding cycles) used for this work.

Download file (10.62 kb)

Suppl. material 4: Genetic Pairwise and Overall Distances

Authors: Gabriela Pozo, María José Pozo, Martín Terán-Velástegui, Maria de Lourdes Torres

Data type: Distance matrices

Brief description:

Estimates of overall genetic diversity for each gene sequence (Cmos, Rag2 and 16S) and estimates of pairwise genetic diversity between all individuals for each gene (Cmos, Rag2 and 16S).

Download file (80.00 kb)

Suppl. material 5: Haplotypes information

Authors: Lía Altamirano-Ponce

Data type: Occurrences

Brief description:

A detail of the sequences obtained for the 16S that conform to each of the nine haplotypes we found.

Download file (9.83 kb)

Suppl. material 6: Field and Collection codes

Authors: Mateo Dávila

Data type: List of codes

Brief description:

This is a list of the collection codes of the specimens used for this research project.

Download file (10.41 kb)

Endnotes