Biodiversity Data Journal :
Taxonomy & Inventories
|
Corresponding author: Norshida Ismail (norshida@unisza.edu.my)
Academic editor: Panakkool Thamban Aneesh
Received: 30 Nov 2023 | Accepted: 12 Jan 2024 | Published: 20 Feb 2024
© 2024 Norshida Ismail, Yusuke Nishida, Susumu Ohtsuka, Geoff Boxshall, James P. Bernot
This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Citation:
Ismail N, Nishida Y, Ohtsuka S, Boxshall G, Bernot JP (2024) First record of Caligus dussumieri Rangnekar, 1957 (Copepoda, Siphonostomatoida, Caligidae) from Malaysia, with notes on caligids found from Malaysia and on host-specificity of caligids on lutjanid fishes. Biodiversity Data Journal 12: e116598. https://doi.org/10.3897/BDJ.12.e116598
|
|
In total, 14 species of Caligus have been reported from Malaysia. Amongst them, four species are reported from lutjanid fishes.
Caligus dussumieri Rangnekar, 1957 is reported from Malabar snapper, Lutjanus malabaricus, purchased from a local wet market in Terengganu, Peninsular Malaysia. This is the first record of this species in Malaysia and it is only the second species assigned to the bonito-group of the genus Caligus to be reported from Malaysia. A key to species of the bonito-group is presented herein. The list of caligids infecting lutjanid fishes and the geographical distributions plus the known hosts of members of the bonito-group of Caligus are discussed.
Caligidae, Lutjanidae, bonito-species group, sea lice, identification key, geographic distribution, host list
Parasitic copepods of the genus Caligus Müller, 1785 (Siphonostomatoida, Caligidae) are well known as pests that cause serious economic losses in the marine aquaculture and fisheries industries globally (
To date, 269 valid species of Caligus have been described from a wide diversity of fish hosts (
Seven species groups have been established within the genus Caligus: the bonito-, confusus-, diaphanus-, macarovi-, productus-, pseudrorhombi- and undulatus-groups (
The fish genus Lutjanus Bloch, 1790 (Lutjanidae) plays an important role in fisheries and aquaculture in Malaysia. The lutjanid catch contributed about 5.3% of the overall marine fish catch in 2021 (
We have conducted taxonomic studies on metazoan parasites on commercially important fish obtained in the fish markets in Terengganu since 2019 (
A single female specimen of Caligus dussumieri was found on the gills of L. malabaricus purchased from the fish landing facility of the Fisheries Development Authority of Malaysia (LKIM) Complex Pulau Kambing, located in Kuala Terengganu, Terengganu State, Malaysia on 19 October 2019. The fish host was purchased dead and brought back to be examined for parasites in the Aquatic Laboratory, Faculty of Bioresources and Food Industry, University Sultan Zainal Abidin Besut Campus. The body surface, head and gills of the host were examined for parasites. Parasite specimens were fixed in 70% ethanol until identification. The copepod specimen was immersed in lactophenol and examined using the
One female of Caligus dussumieri (NHMUK 2022.189–197) was examined using CLSM. The specimen was stained overnight in a saturated solution of Congo Red in 100% ethanol, then rinsed in distilled water until no Congo Red could be seen diffusing and prepared as a temporary mount in a 50% solution of glycerine and distilled water on a glass slide under a coverslip. The specimen was examined using a Leica TCS SP5, equipped with a Leica DM5000 B upright microscope and the Leica Application Suite Advanced Fluorescence software LAS AF 2.2.1. (Leica, Wetzlar, Germany). We used a 561 nm excitation wavelength from a DPSS 10 mW 561 nm laser set at 80% power and collected the emitted fluorescence in two channels: 570–630 nm artificially coloured green and 630–715 nm artificially coloured red. A series of image stacks were collected and the final images were obtained by maximum projection of the overlaid channels using the same Leica software. For the full-body dorsal and ventral images, multiple fields of view were combined using Adobe Photoshop v.25.1.
Sinocaligus dussumieri (Rangnekar, 1957)
Pseudopetalus dussumieri (Rangnekar, 1957)
Caligus rivulatus (Pilla, Vankara and Chikkam, 2012)
Fig.
Female. Body (Fig.
Australian female observed using CLSM (Fig.
Antennule (Fig.
Leg 1 (Fig.
The initial description of C. dussumieri was provided by
In comparison to the recent re-description of C. dussumieri from Australian waters as provided by
Another minor difference was noted regarding the postantennal process. In the current study, C. dussumieri possessed trisensillate papillae, consistent with the description of
A pecten-like structure at the outer distal corner of the first exopodal segment of leg 3 was observed in the present specimen, but this feature was not illustrated in previous studies. However, this structure's presence in the Australian material was subsequently confirmed through additional observations of Australian specimens in this study.
Key to species of the bonito-group of Caligus based on adult females An identification key distinguishing between species in the bonito-group of Caligus based on characteristics of adult females is provided following |
||
1 | First abdominal somite grossly enlarged, wider than genital complex | 2 |
– | Abdomen typically slender, rarely enlarged, but never wider than genital complex | 4 |
2 | Plumose setae on posterior margin of distal exopodal segment of leg 1 well developed (at least as long as distal spine 3) | Caligus timorensis Izawa, 1995 |
– | Plumose setae on posterior margin of distal exopodal segment of leg 1 vestigial (shorter than distal margin spine 3) | 3 |
3 | Abdomen large, peach-shaped, only slightly longer than broad, with deep postero-median lobes | Caligus caudatus Gnanamuthu, 1950 |
– | Abdomen elongate, tapering anteriorly and posteriorly, approximately 2.4 times longer than wide, lacking postero-median lobes | Caligus formicoides Redkar, Rangnekar and Murti, 1949 |
4 | Abdomen enlarged, about as wide as cephalothorax, but slightly narrower than genital complex; sternal furca absent | Caligus grandiabdominalis Yamaguti, 1954 |
– | Abdomen distinctly narrower than cephalothorax and genital complex; sternal furca present | 5 |
5 | Genital complex with well-developed posterolateral lobes, extending to middle of abdomen; first exopodal segment of leg 4 with projecting triangular outer margin | Caligus infestans Heller, 1865 |
– | Genital complex without posterolateral lobes or with lobes not reaching middle of abdomen; first exopodal segment of leg 4 with linear outer margin | 6 |
6 | Abdomen short, about as wide as long and less than half length of genital complex | Caligus asymmetricus Kabata, 1965 |
– | Abdomen distinctly longer than wide (at least 1.5 times) and at least half length of genital complex | 7 |
7 | Leg 4 with conspicuous ornamentation of denticles on surface of first exopodal segment | Caligus pauliani Nuñes-Ruivo & Fourmanoir, 1956 |
– | Leg 4 typically with single setule on margin of first exopodal segment, but lacking ornamentation of denticles on surface of segment | 8 |
8 | Leg 2 with outer spine on first exopodal segment very elongate with spatulate tip | Caligus dussumieri Rangnekar, 1957 |
– | Leg 2 with outer spine on first exopodal segment typical, tapering towards tip | 9 |
9 | Abdomen at most about 2.5 times longer than wide | 10 |
– | Abdomen at least 3 times longer than wide | 16 |
10 | Postantennal process reduced (lacking defined tine) | Caligus phipsoni Basset-Smith 1898 |
– | Postantennal process with typical curved tine | 11 |
11 | Pair of triangular accessory processes present on body surface either side of sternal furca | Caligus hoplognathi Yamaguti and Yamasu, 1959 |
– | Sternal furca lacking associated accessory processes on adjacent body surface | 12 |
12 | Genital complex as long as abdomen, with prominent posterolateral lobes | Caligus bonito C. B. Wilson, 1905 |
– | Genital complex at least 1.3 times longer than abdomen, lacking distinct posterolateral lobes | 13 |
13 | Abdomen 2-segmented | 14 |
– | Abdomen 1-segmented | 15 |
14 | First abdominal somite more than twice as long as small second (anal) somite | Caligus malabaricus Pillai, 1961 |
– | Both abdominal somites about equal in width and length | Caligus cossackii Bassett-Smith, 1898 |
15 | Patches of fine spinules present posteriorly on ventral surface of abdomen | Caligus mutabilis Wilson, 1905 |
– | Ventral surface of abdomen lacking patches of fine spinules posteriorly | Caligus triabdominalis Byrnes, 1987 |
16 | Abdomen longer than or about as long as genital complex, distinct indentation between longer and wider anterior part and small posterior region. | Caligus quadratus Shiino, 1954 |
– | Genital complex at least 1.3 times longer than abdomen, no distinct indentation between posterior and anterior regions | 17 |
17 | Antenna with small, blunt posterior process on proximal segment | 18 |
– | Antenna with small, pointed posterior process on proximal segment | Caligus omissus Cressey and Cressey, 1980 |
18 | Abdomen 1-segmented | 19 |
– | Abdomen 2-segmented, second (anal) somite slightly longer than first abdominal somite | Caligus tenuifurcatus Wilson, 1937 |
19 | Total body length less than 3 mm; small chitinous process present between antenna and postantennal process | Caligus chamelensis Morales-Serna, Pinacho-Pinacho, Gómez and Pérez-Ponce de León, 2014 |
– | Total body length more than 3 mm; lacking any chitinous process between antenna and postantennal process | Caligus asperimanus Pearse, 1951 |
In this present study, the genital complex and abdomen of the adult female examined using CLSM displayed differential intensity of staining. It is possible that this differential intensity of staining is an artefact, but we infer that the staining intensity indicates a difference in the properties of the cuticle. The stained specimen is an adult female immediately prior to the post-mating metamorphosis (see
Caligus dussumieri has been observed to infect two distinct host families, the Lutjanidae and Dussumieriidae. The adult males, copepodid (including chalimus) stages and mated, but not fully metamorphosed adult females were found on Lutjanus johnii from Australian waters (
Lutjanids are a group of fish with high commercial value due to their desirable taste, ability to reproduce in captivity and tolerance to a range of salinity regimes which allow them to thrive in various marine environments including estuaries and mangroves as well as the open sea (
Lutjanus fish host |
Caligus species |
Geographic distribution |
References |
Lutjanus analis (Cuvier, 1828) |
Caligus asperimanus Pearse, 1951 |
Carrie Bow Cay, Belize |
|
Caligus asperimanus Pearse, 1951 |
Bahamas |
|
|
Caligus asperimanus Pearse, 1951 |
off the coast of Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. |
|
|
Caligus robustus Bassett-Smith, 1898 |
Mexico |
|
|
Lutjanus apodus Walbaum, 1792 |
Caligus asperimanus Pearse, 1956 |
Carrie Bow Cay, Belize |
|
Caligus atromaculatus Wilson, 1913 |
Venezuela |
|
|
Caligus tenax Heller, 1865 |
Venezuela |
|
|
Caligus robustus Bassett-Smith, 1898 |
Belize |
|
|
Caligus xystercus Cressey, 1991 |
Belize |
|
|
Lutjanus argentimaculatus Forsskål, 1775 |
Caligus epidemicus Hewitt, 1972 |
Philipines |
|
Caligus lutjani Ho, Lin and Chang, 2007 |
Taiwan |
|
|
Caligus quadratus Shiino, 1954 |
Taiwan |
|
|
Lutjanus argentiventris Peters, 1869 |
Caligus asperimanus Pearse, 1961 |
Manabí Coast, Ecuador |
|
Caligus diaphanus Nordmann, 1833 |
Jaramijó, Ecuador |
|
|
Caligus latigenitalis Shiino, 1954 |
Bahía de Chamela, Mexican Pacific |
|
|
Caligus latigenitalis Shiino, 1955 |
Jaramijó, Ecuador |
|
|
Caligus serratus Shiino, 1965 |
Mexican Pacific |
|
|
Caligus schistonyx Wilson, 1905 |
Jaramijó, Ecuador |
|
|
Caligus tenuifurcatus Wilson, 1937 |
Mexican Pacific |
|
|
Lutjanus bohar Forsskål, 1775 |
Caligus lutjani |
Taiwan |
|
Lutjanus colorado Jordan and Gilbert, 1882 |
Caligus sclerotinosus Roubal, Armitage and Rohde, 1983 |
Bahía de Chamela,Mexican Pacific |
|
Lutjanus erythropterus Bloch, 1790 |
Caligus chiastos |
Malaysia |
|
Caligus clemensi |
Penang, Malaysia |
|
|
Caligus torpedinis (as C. rotundigenitalis) |
Malaysia |
|
|
Lutjanus fulviflamma Forsskål, 1775 |
Caligus chiastos |
Taiwan |
|
Caligus chiastos |
Moreton Bay, Australia |
|
|
Caligus epidemicus |
Moreton Bay, Australia |
|
|
Lutjanus fulvus Forster, 1801 |
Caligus mutabilis |
Palmyra Atoll, Central Pacific |
|
Lutjanus griseus Linnaeus, 1758 |
Caligus atromaculatus Wilson, 1913 |
Florida |
|
Caligus bonito |
Isla de Margarita,Venezuela |
|
|
Caligus bonito |
Gulf of Mexico |
|
|
Caligus irritans Heller, 1869 |
Venezuela |
|
|
Caligus wilsoni Delamare Deboutteville and Nunes Ruivo, 1958 |
Charlotte Harbor, Florida |
|
|
Lutjanus guttatus Steindachner, 1869 |
Caligus diaphanus Nordmann, 1834 |
Jaramijó, Ecuador |
|
Caligus mutabilis |
Mexican Pacific |
|
|
Caligus sclerotinosus |
Bahía de Chamela,Mexican Pacific |
|
|
Lutjanus jocu Bloch and Schneider, 1801 |
Caligus asperimanus |
Carrie Bow Cay, Belize |
|
Caligus asperimanus |
off the coast of Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. |
|
|
Lutjanus johnii Bloch, 1792 |
Caligus asperimanus |
India Coast |
|
Caligus auriilus Boxhall and Barton, 2023 |
Australia |
|
|
Caligus chiastos |
Malaysia |
|
|
Caligus dussumieri |
Australia |
|
|
Lutjanus monostigma Cuvier, 1828 |
Caligus mutabilis |
Palmyra Atoll, Central Pacific |
|
Lutjanus malabaricus |
Caligus malabaricus |
Malacca Strait, Malaysia |
|
Caligus torpedinis (as C. rotundigenitalis) |
India |
|
|
Lutjanus novemfasciatus Gill, 1862 |
Caligus bonito |
Mexican Pacific |
|
Lutjanus peru Nichols and Murphy, 1922 |
Caligus mutabilis |
Mexican Pacific |
|
Lutjanus peru Nichols & Murphy, 1922 |
Caligus diaphanus |
Bahía de Chamela,Mexican Pacific |
|
Caligus sclerotinosus |
Bahía de Chamela,Mexican Pacific |
|
|
Lutjanus rivulatus Cuvier, 1828 |
Caligus nengai Rangnekar, Rangnekar & Murti, 1953 |
Taiwan |
|
Caligus dussumieri |
India |
|
|
Lutjanus russellii Bleeker, 1849 |
Caligus quadratus |
Taiwan |
|
Caligus torpedinis (as C. rotundigenitalis) |
Taiwan |
|
|
Caligus pagrosomi Yamaguti, 1939 |
Taiwan |
|
|
Caligus laticaudus |
Taiwan |
|
|
Lutjanus synagris Linnaeus, 1758 |
Caligus asperimanus |
off the coast of Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. |
|
Caligus asperimanus |
Carrie Bow Cay, Belize |
|
|
Caligus atromaculatus |
Venezuela |
|
|
Caligus praetextus Bere, 1936 |
Charlotte Harbor, Florida |
|
|
Caligus rufimaculatus Wilson, 1905 |
Florida and the Gulf of Mexico |
|
|
Caligus praetextus |
Belize; Florida |
|
|
Lutjanus vitta Quoy and Gaimard, 1824 |
Caligus laticaudus |
Taiwan |
|
Caligus torpedinis (as C. rotundigenitalis) |
Taiwan |
|
|
Lutjanus vivanus Cuvier, 1828 |
Caligus asperimanus |
off the coast of Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. |
|
Lutjanus spp. |
Caligus productus Dana, 1852 |
Mexican Pacific |
|
Species of Caligus, belonging to the bonito-group, are known from a variety of lutjanid hosts around the world. Caligus asperimanus and C. mutabilis exhibit a broad distribution and host range, having been reported from up to seven different lutjanid hosts in different regions, including Belize (
In Malaysia, out of the 20 species of fish previously reported to serve as hosts for caligid copepods, three species of lutjanids are known to collectively host four species of Caligus: Lutjanus erythropterus hosts C. chiastos and C. torpedinis; L. johnii hosts C. chiastos; and L. malabaricus hosts C. malabaricus (
Caligus dussumieri is assigned to the bonito-group because of the presence of three plumose setae on the distal exopodal segment of leg 1 and a row of stout denticles along the outer margin of the second endopodal segment of leg 2 (
Caligids from the bonito-group have been recorded from another 30 families of fish, of which eight families (Carangidae, Coryphaenidae, Hemiramphidae, Istiophoridae, Nematistiidae, Pomatomidae, Scombridae and Sphyraenidae) are generally known as pelagic fish and 21 families are demersal fish from families Ariidae, Balistidae, Caesionidae, Centropomidae, Embiotocidae, Ephippidae, Gerreidae, Haemulidae, Kyphosidae, Mugilidae, Mullidae, Oplegnathidae, Polynemidae, Pomacentridae. Rhinobatidae, Sciaenidae, Serranidae, Siganidae and Sparidae. However, they appear to predominantly parasitise members of the family Scombridae. The fact that they primarily infect pelagic fish, but also use many minor demersal fish as hosts may indicate a possible history of evolutionary host-switching from pelagic to demersal fish.
An interesting example of host-switching during development is known in C. pauliani (previously reported as C. biseriodentatus), which infects different hosts at different life stages. The adult females are known from the frigate tuna Auxis thazard Lacepède, 1800, while premetamorphic adults and copepodid stages characterised mainly by smaller size, slender genital somites and not bearing eggs, are known from a variety of host species belonging to the genus Scomberomorus Lacepède, 1801. This form of host-switching appears to involve mated females only given that both pre-metamorphic adult females and males occur on the first host, which is where mating takes place, while only the mated females are known from the second host where the metamorphic developmental changes are completed.
The bonito-group has a broad distribution in low to middle latitudes across all oceans, with a denser concentration in the Indo-Pacific. The distribution of species infecting Lutjanidae is primarily concentrated in low latitudes due to the abundance of lutjanid fish in tropical and subtropical areas, as indicated in Fig.
We would like to express our sincere thanks to Mr Nik Ahmad Firdaus Nik Wan (ESERI, UniSZA) for helping in ArcGIS software for generating the map for this manuscript, Dr Ahmad Syazni Kamarudin and Miss Siti Nur Nadhirah for helping in sampling and support for this study, to Dr Danny Tang and reviewers for comments to improve this manuscript. This study was supported by a collaborative grant SRGS/2021/SRGS-IC/04 from Universiti Sultan Zainal Abidin, Malaysia (awarded to NI) and grants-in-aid of the JSPS (KAKENHI, No. 19H03032, awarded to S.O.; bilateral partnership program, No. JPJSBP120209924 awarded to S.O.). This material is based in part upon work supported by the NSF Postdoctoral Research Fellowships in Biology Program under Grant No. 2010898 to J.P.B.