Biodiversity Data Journal :
Data Paper (Biosciences)
|
Corresponding author: Hiroki Itô (abies.firma@gmail.com)
Academic editor: Pavel Stoev
Received: 07 Jan 2017 | Accepted: 14 Mar 2017 | Published: 17 Mar 2017
© 2017 Hiroki Itô
This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Citation:
Itô H (2017) Time series data of a broadleaved secondary forest in Japan as affected by deer and mass mortality of oak trees. Biodiversity Data Journal 5: e11732. https://doi.org/10.3897/BDJ.5.e11732
|
|
Abandonment of broadleaved secondary forests that have been used for various purposes may cause the loss of biodiversity. Some of these forests suffer from diseases such as Japanese oak wilt. An increasing number of deer also impact some of them. Monitoring and recording the status of such forests is important for their proper management.
This data set provides a concrete example of temporal changes in a temperate broadleaved secondary forest. The forest has been damaged by mass mortality of oak trees caused by Japanese oak wilt disease. In addition, the forest has been under foraging pressure by sika deer (Cervus nippon Temminck). The data set can provide information on how such a forest has changed in species composition of the canopy and sub-canopy layers and in species occurrence in the understory layer.
broadleaved secondary forest; conifer plantation; deer impact; mass mortality of oak trees
The progress of succession due to underuse or abandonment of secondary forests that have been used for various purposes, such as sources of firewood and charcoal wood, may cause loss of biodiversity in Japan (
In addition, deer impact also affects broadleaved forests in Japan (
It is important to monitor and record the changes in such forests to manage them properly. This data set provides information on how succession has proceeded in a broadleaf secondary forest in Japan and how the combined effects of the mass mortality of oak trees and deer impacts altered the forest. The data set consists of changes in species composition, stem density and stem diameter at breast height in the canopy and sub-canopy layer from 1993 to 2014, and changes in occurrence of woody species in the understory layer from 1992 to 2014.
This study was initiated in 1992 to monitor the dynamics of broadleaved secondary forests adjacent to urban areas. Although the study site also contained a conifer plantation, regeneration of broadleaved species within the plantation was also monitored. After periodic surveys (1993, 1996, 1999, 2002 and 2005) were completed (
This study was conducted in the Ginkakuzi-san (also spelled Ginkakuji-san) National Forest, Kyôto City, Japan. This area is located in the warm-temperate zone. The dominant vegetation of the area had been evergreen oak forest approximately 7000 to 1000 years ago, but secondary forests composed of pines and deciduous oaks increased after that (
A 1.05 ha (210 m × 50 m) study site was established in 1992 (Fig.
Outline of the study site. A) Contour map. B) Stand type. B: broadleaved, BT: broadleaved (thinned), C: conifer plantation, G: gap (not related to mass mortality of oak trees), GM: gap created or affected by mass mortality of oak trees. A GM in the conifer plantation was generated by a dead oak stem that remained in the plantation.
Two classes of forest layers were defined: the canopy and sub-canopy layer and the understory layer. Stems in the canopy and sub-canopy layer were defined as having a diameter at breast height (dbh) at least 3.0 cm, and stems in the understory layer were defined as those with a dbh smaller than 3.0 cm or a height shorter than 1.3 m (not including those seedlings and shoots sprouted in the current year). During the period from December 1993 to February 1994, all stems in the canopy and sub-canopy layer were marked, identified by species name, and their dbh measured using a measuring tape with 1 mm precision. After that, dbh was measured in 1996, 1999, 2002, 2005 and 2014 during the non-growing season (October to January of the following year) in the same way. Measurement values in 1999 are missing in the most eastern half of the study site because slope collapse prevention works were conducted near the area.
In 1992, the species of woody plants found in the understory layer were recorded for each quadrat to obtain the understory species composition of the forest in autumn (September to November). The same survey was conducted again in 2014 (July to November). The dynamics of the half of the study site that solely consisted of broadleaved forest was reported in
Ginkakuzi-san National Forest, Kyôto City, Japan
35.028 and 35.029 Latitude; 135.802 and 135.800 Longitude.
The six surveys from 1993 to 2014 found 61 species in the canopy and sub-canopy layer. Table
Changes in number of stems and basal area for each species in the canopy and sub-canopy layer.
Species | D1993 | D2014 | B1993 | B2014 |
Chamaecyparis obtusa (Siebold & Zucc.) Endl. | 375.2 | 218.1 | 8.5E+00 | 1.2E+01 |
Quercus glauca Thunb. | 412.4 | 515.2 | 2.5E+00 | 4.7E+00 |
Symplocos prunifolia Siebold & Zucc. | 491.4 | 261.9 | 4.8E+00 | 3.7E+00 |
Cryptomeria japonica (L.f.) D.Don | 81.9 | 61.9 | 2.3E+00 | 3.2E+00 |
Ilex macropoda Miq. | 138.1 | 103.8 | 3.0E+00 | 3.1E+00 |
Ilex pedunculosa Miq. | 193.3 | 141.0 | 2.9E+00 | 2.3E+00 |
Gamblea innovans (Siebold & Zucc.) C.B.Shang, Lowry & Frodin | 361.0 | 81.9 | 3.0E+00 | 1.5E+00 |
Quercus serrata Murray | 37.1 | 14.3 | 2.8E+00 | 1.5E+00 |
Chengiopanax sciadophylloides (Franch. & Sav.) C.B.Shang et J.Y.Huang | 78.1 | 20.0 | 1.5E+00 | 8.1E-01 |
Cleyera japonica Thunb. | 70.5 | 386.7 | 8.7E-02 | 8.1E-01 |
Carpinus laxiflora (Siebold & Zucc.) Blume | 29.5 | 18.1 | 7.6E-01 | 7.8E-01 |
Cerasus jamasakura (Siebold ex Koidz.) H.Ohba | 12.4 | 6.7 | 3.4E-01 | 6.3E-01 |
Photinia glabra (Thunb.) Maxim. | 79.0 | 85.7 | 4.1E-01 | 5.3E-01 |
Carpinus tschonoskii Maxim. | 8.6 | 5.7 | 3.7E-01 | 5.1E-01 |
Wisteria floribunda (Willd.) DC. | 119.0 | 90.5 | 3.3E-01 | 4.9E-01 |
Padus grayana (Maxim.) C.K.Schneid. | 17.1 | 10.5 | 2.6E-01 | 3.9E-01 |
Abies firma Siebold & Zucc. | 3.8 | 2.9 | 1.8E-01 | 3.4E-01 |
Eurya japonica var. japonica | 112.4 | 246.7 | 1.2E-01 | 3.3E-01 |
Lyonia ovalifolia var. elliptica (Siebold & Zucc.) Hand.-Mazz. | 61.9 | 19.0 | 3.9E-01 | 2.3E-01 |
Albizia julibrissin Durazz. | 13.3 | 1.9 | 4.1E-01 | 2.2E-01 |
Aria japonica Decne. | 1.0 | 1.0 | 1.2E-01 | 1.6E-01 |
Acer palmatum Thunb. | 2.9 | 6.7 | 1.2E-01 | 1.5E-01 |
Ilex chinensis Sims | 1.9 | 1.9 | 2.2E-01 | 1.4E-01 |
Fraxinus sieboldiana Blume | 22.9 | 10.5 | 2.0E-01 | 1.3E-01 |
Mallotus japonicus (L.f.) Müll.Arg. | 4.8 | 1.9 | 1.5E-01 | 1.3E-01 |
Camellia japonica L. | 25.7 | 27.6 | 5.6E-02 | 1.2E-01 |
Styrax japonica Siebold & Zucc. | 35.2 | 9.5 | 3.0E-01 | 1.2E-01 |
Clethra barbinervis Siebold & Zucc. | 22.9 | 10.5 | 2.5E-01 | 1.0E-01 |
Dendropanax trifidus (Thunb.) Makino ex H.Hara | 4.8 | 4.8 | 8.8E-02 | 9.9E-02 |
Cinnamomum camphora (L.) J.Presl | 1.0 | 3.8 | 7.8E-03 | 9.6E-02 |
Ilex rotunda Thunb. | 1.9 | 1.9 | 5.2E-02 | 8.8E-02 |
Diospyros kaki Thunb. | 5.7 | 1.9 | 8.3E-02 | 8.2E-02 |
Laurocerasus spinulosa (Siebold & Zucc.) C.K.Schneid. | 3.8 | 1.9 | 2.0E-01 | 8.0E-02 |
Ligustrum japonicum Thunb. | 15.2 | 17.1 | 3.3E-02 | 6.4E-02 |
Idesia polycarpa Maxim. | 1.9 | 1.0 | 2.2E-02 | 6.3E-02 |
Alnus sieboldiana Matsum. | 2.9 | 1.0 | 1.9E-01 | 6.2E-02 |
Zanthoxylum ailanthoides Siebold & Zucc. | 3.8 | 1.9 | 1.8E-01 | 4.8E-02 |
Castanopsis cuspidata (Thunb.) Schottky | 1.0 | 10.5 | 1.6E-02 | 4.7E-02 |
Vaccinium bracteatum Thunb. | 17.1 | 4.8 | 3.6E-02 | 3.9E-02 |
Euscaphis japonica (Thunb.) Kanitz | 6.7 | 1.0 | 8.0E-03 | 2.5E-02 |
Toxicodendron sylvestre (Siebold & Zucc.) Kuntze | 2.9 | 1.0 | 3.4E-02 | 1.1E-02 |
Magnolia compressa Maxim. | 0.0 | 1.0 | 0.0E+00 | 3.7E-03 |
Rhododendron reticulatum D.Don ex G.Don | 9.5 | 3.8 | 9.2E-03 | 3.6E-03 |
Osmanthus heterophyllus (G.Don) P.S.Green | 3.8 | 2.9 | 4.9E-03 | 3.5E-03 |
Pieris japonica (Thunb.) D.Don ex G.Don | 5.7 | 1.0 | 1.1E-02 | 3.2E-03 |
Symplocos sawafutagi Nagam. | 1.9 | 2.9 | 1.6E-03 | 3.2E-03 |
Pourthiaea villosa var. villosa | 1.0 | 1.0 | 8.6E-04 | 2.5E-03 |
Triadica sebifera (L.) Small | 0 | 1.0 | 0.0E+00 | 2.2E-03 |
Acer crataegifolium Siebold & Zucc. | 1.9 | 0 | 3.9E-03 | 0.0E+00 |
Alnus firma Siebold & Zucc. | 1.0 | 0 | 2.3E-03 | 0.0E+00 |
Amelanchier asiatica (Siebold & Zucc.) Endl. ex Walp. | 2.9 | 0 | 1.1E-02 | 0.0E+00 |
Aucuba japonica var. japonica | 1.0 | 0 | 9.7E-04 | 0.0E+00 |
Castanea crenata Siebold & Zucc. | 1.9 | 0 | 3.0E-02 | 0.0E+00 |
Cinnamomum yabunikkei H.Ohba | 1.0 | 0 | 1.7E-03 | 0.0E+00 |
Elaeagnus glabra Thunb. | 1.0 | 0 | 2.3E-03 | 0.0E+00 |
Ilex crenata Thunb. | 1.0 | 0 | 8.6E-04 | 0.0E+00 |
Ilex micrococca Maxim. | 1.0 | 0 | 1.3E-01 | 0.0E+00 |
Pinus densiflora Siebold & Zucc. | 20.0 | 0 | 1.5E+00 | 0.0E+00 |
Quercus acutissima Carruth. | 1.0 | 0 | 1.7E-03 | 0.0E+00 |
Toxicodendron trichocarpum (Miq.) Kuntze | 23.8 | 0 | 5.8E-02 | 0.0E+00 |
Total | 2961.4 | 2428.3 | 3.91E+01 | 3.99E+01 |
The most abundant species was Symplocos prunifolia Siebold & Zucc. in 1993, but Quercus glauca Thunb. surpassed it by 2014. The dominant species in the basal area was consistently Chamaecyparis obtusa, which occupied most of the plantation area of the study site. Quercus serrata decreased in density from 37.1 to 14.3 stems/ha and in basal area from 2.8 to 1.5 m2/ha (Table
In the understory layer, 88 woody species were found over the two surveys in 1992 and 2014 excluding unidentified species. Table
Changes in number of quadrats where each species was found (out of 420 quadrats) in the understory layer.
Species | 1992 | 2014 |
Quercus glauca Thunb. | 361 | 392 |
Eurya japonica var. japonica | 362 | 304 |
Symplocos prunifolia Siebold & Zucc. | 75 | 274 |
Cryptomeria japonica (L.f.) D.Don | 190 | 163 |
Photinia glabra (Thunb.) Maxim. | 168 | 114 |
Cryptomeria japonica (L.f.) D.Don | 26 | 79 |
Ilex pedunculosa Miq. | 36 | 72 |
Carpinus laxiflora (Siebold & Zucc.) Blume | 15 | 58 |
Chamaecyparis obtusa (Siebold & Zucc.) Endl. | 13 | 58 |
Styrax japonica Siebold et Zucc. | 4 | 53 |
Camellia japonica L. | 64 | 51 |
Mallotus japonicus (L.f.) Müll.Arg. | 2 | 46 |
Ilex macropoda Miq. | 6 | 45 |
Cleyera japonica Thunb. | 7 | 44 |
Celtis sinensis Pers. | 0 | 40 |
Zanthoxylum ailanthoides Siebold & Zucc. | 0 | 37 |
Osmanthus heterophyllus (G.Don) P.S.Green | 26 | 35 |
Carpinus tschonoskii Maxim. | 1 | 29 |
Fraxinus sieboldiana Blume | 0 | 28 |
Callicarpa mollis Siebold & Zucc. | 13 | 25 |
Castanopsis cuspidata (Thunb.) Schottky | 19 | 22 |
Ilex micrococca Maxim. | 0 | 22 |
Zelkova serrata (Thunb.) Makino | 2 | 20 |
Gamblea innovans (Siebold & Zucc.) C.B.Shang, Lowry & Frodin | 24 | 18 |
Aphananthe aspera (Thunb.) Planch. | 1 | 18 |
Pinus densiflora Siebold & Zucc. | 2 | 17 |
Cinnamomum yabunikkei H.Ohba | 26 | 16 |
Quercus serrata Murray | 14 | 16 |
Ilex crenata Thunb. | 143 | 15 |
Abelia serrata Siebold & Zucc. | 17 | 15 |
Acer palmatum Thunb. | 9 | 15 |
Chengiopanax sciadophylloides (Franch. & Sav.) C.B.Shang & J.Y.Huang | 13 | 14 |
Triadica sebifera (L.) Small | 0 | 14 |
Ligustrum japonicum Thunb. | 68 | 13 |
Aria japonica Decne. | 2 | 12 |
Idesia polycarpa Maxim. | 0 | 12 |
Rubus microphyllus L.f. | 0 | 11 |
Laurocerasus spinulosa (Siebold & Zucc.) C.K.Schneid. | 20 | 10 |
Pieris japonica (Thunb.) D.Don ex G.Don | 12 | 10 |
Rhododendron reticulatum D.Don ex G.Don | 4 | 7 |
Albizia julibrissin Durazz. | 0 | 7 |
Cinnamomum camphora (L.) J.Presl | 0 | 7 |
Rhododendron macrosepalum Maxim. | 26 | 6 |
Cornus macrophylla Wall. | 0 | 6 |
Aucuba japonica var. japonica | 211 | 5 |
Vaccinium bracteatum Thunb. | 61 | 5 |
Toxicodendron trichocarpum (Miq.) Kuntze | 42 | 5 |
Lyonia ovalifolia var. elliptica (Siebold & Zucc.) Hand.-Mazz. | 20 | 5 |
Abies firma Siebold & Zucc. | 3 | 5 |
Symplocos sawafutagi Nagam. | 2 | 5 |
Ardisia crenata Sims | 3 | 4 |
Rubus buergeri Miq. | 64 | 3 |
Lindera umbellata Thunb. | 39 | 3 |
Elaeagnus pungens Thunb. | 4 | 3 |
Rubus palmatus var. palmatus | 1 | 3 |
Rubus phoenicolasius Maxim. | 0 | 3 |
Acer crataegifolium Siebold & Zucc. | 4 | 2 |
Padus grayana (Maxim.) C.K.Schneid. | 3 | 2 |
Damnacanthus indicus var. indicus | 2 | 2 |
Aralia elata (Miq.) Seem. | 0 | 2 |
Cerasus jamasakura (Siebold ex Koidz.) H.Ohba | 0 | 2 |
Ilex chinensis Sims | 0 | 2 |
Rosa multiflora Thunb. | 0 | 2 |
Rubus hirsutus Thunb. | 0 | 2 |
Unidentified | 0 | 2 |
Vaccinium hirtum Thunb. | 6 | 1 |
Vaccinium smallii A.Gray | 6 | 1 |
Castanea crenata Siebold & Zucc. | 2 | 1 |
Clerodendrum trichotomum Thunb. | 2 | 1 |
Illicium anisatum L. | 1 | 1 |
Broussonetia monoica Hance | 0 | 1 |
Epigaea asiatica Maxim. | 0 | 1 |
Ilex integra Thunb. | 0 | 1 |
Zanthoxylum piperitum (L.) DC. | 0 | 1 |
Viburnum erosum Thunb. | 11 | 0 |
Ardisia japonica (Thunb.) Blume | 10 | 0 |
Trachycarpus fortunei (Hook.) H.Wendl. | 7 | 0 |
Euscaphis japonica (Thunb.) Kanitz | 6 | 0 |
Rhododendron kaempferi var. kaempferi | 6 | 0 |
Dendropanax trifidus (Thunb.) Makino ex H.Hara | 4 | 0 |
Neolitsea sericea (Blume) Koidz. | 4 | 0 |
Camellia sinensis (L.) Kuntze | 3 | 0 |
Carpinus sp. | 2 | 0 |
Diospyros kaki Thunb. | 2 | 0 |
Neolitsea sp. | 2 | 0 |
Pourthiaea villosa var. villosa | 2 | 0 |
Cephalotaxus harringtonia var. harringtonia | 1 | 0 |
Elaeagnus sp. | 1 | 0 |
Fatsia japonica (Thunb.) Decne. & Planch. | 1 | 0 |
Quercus acutissima Carruth. | 1 | 0 |
Symplocos lancifolia Siebold & Zucc. | 1 | 0 |
Vaccinium japonicum Miq. | 1 | 0 |
Vaccinium sp. | 1 | 0 |
Forestry and Forest Products Research Institute (Matsunosato 1, Tsukuba 305-8687, Japan) has ownership of this data set.
Location and stand type of each quadrat.
Column label | Column description |
---|---|
X | Position of the northwest corner of the quadrat along the X axis (m). |
Y | Position of the northwest corner of the quadrat along the Y axis (m). |
Type1992 | Stand type of the quadrat (B: broadleaved forest, C: conifer plantation, G: gap). |
Type2014 | Stand type of the quadrat (B: broadleaved forest, C: conifer plantation, G: gap (not related to mass mortality of oak trees), GM: gap created or affected by the mass mortality of oak trees). |
Elevation of grid points (5 m × 5 m) of the study site.
Column label | Column description |
---|---|
X | Location along the X axis (m). |
Y | Location along the Y axis (m). |
Elevation | Elevation (m; precision: 0.1 m). |
List of all stems found from 1993 to 2014.
Column label | Column description |
---|---|
Indv | Individual ID |
Stem | Stem ID |
X | Position of the northwest corner of the quadrat where the stem was located along the X axis (m). |
Y | Position of the northwest corner of the quadrat where the stem was located along the Y axis (m). |
X1 | Position of the stem along the X axis (m; precision: 0.1 m). |
Y1 | Position of the stem along the X axis (m; precision: 0.1 m). |
Species | Species of the stem. |
Start | Year when the stem was first marked. |
End | Year when the stem was last found alive (NA denotes that the stem was still alive in 2014). |
Measurements of dbh for each stem from 1993 to 2014. Measurement values in 1999 are missing in the most eastern half of the study site because slope collapse prevention works were conducted near the area.
Column label | Column description |
---|---|
Stem | Stem ID |
Year | Year of the measurement. |
DBH | Diameter at breast height (cm; precision: 0.1 cm). NA denotes missing data. |
Comment | Comment on the measurement. |
Occurrence of woody species in the understory layer for each quadrat.
Column label | Column description |
---|---|
Year | Survey year. |
X | Position of the northwest corner of the quadrat along the X axis (m). |
Y | Position of the northwest corner of the quadrat along the Y axis (m). |
Species | Species found in the quadrat. |
Occurrence data of woody species in the Ginkakuzi-san National Forest.
Column label | Column description |
---|---|
occurrenceID | An identifier for the Occurrence. |
modified | The most recent date-time on which the resource was changed. |
rights | Information about who can access the resource or an indication of its security status. |
rightsHolder | A person or organization owning or managing rights over the resource. |
institutionCode | The name (or acronym) in use by the institution having custody of the object(s) or information referred to in the record. |
collectionCode | The name, acronym, coden, or initialism identifying the collection or data set from which the record was derived. |
datasetName | The name identifying the data set from which the record was derived. |
basisOfRecord | The specific nature of the data record. |
catalogNumber | An identifier (preferably unique) for the record within the data set or collection. |
year | The four-digit year in which the Event occurred, according to the Common Era Calendar. |
country | The name of the country or major administrative unit in which the Location occurs. |
countryCode | The standard code for the country in which the Location occurs. |
verbatimLocality | The original textual description of the place. |
decimalLatitude | The geographic latitude (in decimal degrees, using the spatial reference system given in geodeticDatum) of the geographic center of a Location. |
decimalLongitude | The geographic longitude (in decimal degrees, using the spatial reference system given in geodeticDatum) of the geographic center of a Location. |
coordinateUncertaintyInMeters | The horizontal distance (in meters) from the given decimalLatitude and decimalLongitude describing the smallest circle containing the whole of the Location. |
scientificName | The full scientific name, with authorship and date information if known. |
kingdom | The full scientific name of the kingdom in which the taxon is classified. |
phylum | The full scientific name of the phylum or division in which the taxon is classified. |
family | The full scientific name of the family in which the taxon is classified. |
genus | The full scientific name of the genus in which the taxon is classified. |
specificEpithe | The name of the first or species epithet of the scientificName. |
infraspecificEpithet | The name of the lowest or terminal infraspecific epithet of the scientificName, excluding any rank designation. |
The author thanks Dr. T. Osawa (National Agriculture and Food Research Organization) for giving suggestions on the Darwin Core format. The author also thanks the Kyoto-Osaka District Forest Office for permitting the field study. This study was partially supported by research grant #201504 of the Forestry and Forest Products Research Institute and JSPS KAKENHI JP26450215.