Biodiversity Data Journal :
Taxonomy & Inventories
|
Corresponding author: Cheng Wang (wchengspider@163.com)
Academic editor: Yanfeng Tong
Received: 06 Feb 2024 | Accepted: 08 Mar 2024 | Published: 13 Mar 2024
© 2024 Cheng Wang, Jiahui Gan, Xiaoqi Mi
This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Citation:
Wang C, Gan J, Mi X (2024) Two new species of Lysiteles Simon, 1895 from Cibagou National Nature Reserve, Xizang, China (Araneae, Thomisidae). Biodiversity Data Journal 12: e120347. https://doi.org/10.3897/BDJ.12.e120347
|
Lysiteles Simon, 1895 contains 64 nominal species distributed in East, South and South Asia. It possesses very high species diversity in China (with 46 and 32 endemics), Bhutan (with 9 and 1 endemic) and Nepal (with 8 and 4 endemics).
In June 2023, a spider survey of Cibagou National Nature Reserve, Xizang, China was carried out. After examination and morphological comparison, two Lysiteles species were recognised as new to science.
Two new species of Lysiteles Simon, 1895 collected from Cibagou National Nature Reserve, Xizang, China are described: L. cibagou sp. nov. (♂♀) and L. tangi sp. nov. (♂♀). Diagnostic photos of habitus and copulatory organs and a distributional map are provided.
Crab spider, morphology, new species, southwest China, taxonomy
Lysiteles Simon, 1895 is represented by a group of tiny spiders remarkable for having conspicuous blackish-brown markings on the dorsum of carapace and abdomen mostly (
The goal of the present work is to describe two new Lysiteles species collected from Cibagou National Nature Reserve, Xizang, China.
All specimens were preserved in 80%–95% alcohol and are deposited in the Museum of Tongren University (TRU) in Tongren, China. The specimens were examined with an Olympus SZX10 stereomicroscope. After dissection, the vulvae were cleared in trypsin enzyme solution before examination and imaging. Images were taken with a Kuy Nice CCD mounted on an Olympus BX43 compound microscope. Compound focus images were generated using Helicon Focus v. 6.7.1 (
ALE = anterior lateral eyes; AME = anterior median eyes; CD = copulatory duct; E = embolus; FD = fertilisation duct; MOA = median ocular area; PLE = posterior lateral eyes; PME = posterior median eyes; RTA = retrolateral tibial apophysis; S = spermatheca; TSP = transversal sclerotised plate; VTA = ventral tibial apophysis.
Male (holotype, TRU-TD-XZ-001). Total length 2.93. Carapace 1.35 long, 1.23 wide; Abdomen 1.61 long, 1.17 wide. Eye sizes and inter-distances: AME 0.11, ALE 0.21, PME 0.06, PLE 0.16; AME–AME 0.13, AME–ALE 0.11, PME–PME 0.21, PME–PLE 0.25; MOA 0.30 long, front width 0.34, back width 0.38. Measurements of legs: I 5.63 (1.75, 0.55, 1.45, 1.18, 0.70), II 5.66 (1.70, 0.58, 1.48, 1.20, 0.70), III 3.74 (1.18, 0.43, 0.95, 0.73, 0.45), IV 3.90 (1.25, 0.40, 1.00, 0.80, 0.45). Carapace (Fig.
Male holotype (TRU-TD-XZ-001) and female paratype (TRU-TD-XZ-004) of Lysiteles cibagou sp. nov.; A, B epigyne, ventral view; C, D vulva, dorsal view; E holotype habitus, dorsal view; F ditto, ventral view; G female paratype habitus, dorsal view; H ditto, ventral view. Scale bars = (A–D) 0.1 mm; (E–H) 0.5 mm.
Male holotype (TRU-TD-XZ-009) and female paratype (TRU-TD-XZ-016) of Lysiteles tangi sp. nov.; A, B epigyne, ventral view; C, D vulva, dorsal view; E holotype habitus, dorsal view; F ditto, ventral view; G female paratype habitus, dorsal view; H ditto, ventral view. Scale bars = (A–D) 0.1 mm; (E–H) 0.5 mm.
Female (paratype, TRU-TD-XZ-004). Total length 3.02. Carapace 1.23 long, 1.16 wide; Abdomen 1.81 long, 1.55 wide. Eye sizes and inter-distances: AME 0.12, ALE 0.21, PME 0.06, PLE 0.15; AME–AME 0.14, AME–ALE 0.11, PME–PME 0.23, PME–PLE 0.27; MOA 0.29 long, front width 0.34, back width 0.38. Measurements of legs: I 4.16 (1.28, 0.50, 1.00, 0.80, 0.58), II 4.23 (1.33, 0.50, 1.03, 0.83, 0.55), III 2.94 (0.93, 0.38, 0.70, 0.55, 0.38), IV 3.11 (1.00, 0.38, 0.75, 0.60, 0.38). Habitus (Fig.
Lysiteles cibagou sp. nov. resembles that of L. conflatus Tang, Yin, Peng, Ubick & Griswold, 2008 in having similar copulatory organs, especially the postero-retrolaterally extended embolus, broad transversal sclerotised plate and thick copulatory duct, but it can be easily distinguished by the following: 1) the embolus is spiralled (Fig.
The species name is derived from the name of the type locality; noun in apposition.
Male (holotype, TRU-TD-XZ-009). Total length 3.76. Carapace 1.88 long, 1.67 wide; Abdomen 1.91 long, 1.24 wide. Eye sizes and inter-distances: AME 0.13, ALE 0.24, PME 0.08, PLE 0.18; AME–AME 0.16, AME–ALE 0.13, PME–PME 0.28, PME–PLE 0.32; MOA 0.32 long, front width 0.41, back width 0.46. Measurements of legs: I 7.49 (2.20, 0.83, 1.88, 1.63, 0.95), II 7.64 (2.33, 0.78, 1.93, 1.65, 0.95), III 4.98 (1.50, 0.63, 1.25, 1.00, 0.60), IV 5.08 (1.60, 0.55, 1.25, 1.08, 0.60). Carapace (Fig.
Female (paratype, TRU-TD-XZ-016). Total length 3.35. Carapace 1.57 long, 1.46 wide; Abdomen 1.81 long, 1.46 wide. Eye sizes and inter-distances: AME 0.14, ALE 0.23, PME 0.08, PLE 0.17; AME–AME 0.17, AME–ALE 0.13, PME–PME 0.29, PME–PLE 0.32; MOA 0.32 long, front width 0.42, back width 0.46. Measurements of legs: I 5.46 (1.63, 0.68, 1.30, 1.10, 0.75), II 5.51 (1.65, 0.63, 1.35, 1.13, 0.75), III 3.80 (1.15, 0.50, 0.95, 0.70, 0.50), IV 3.98 (1.25, 0.50, 0.95, 0.78, 0.50). Habitus (Fig.
Lysiteles tangi sp. nov. closely resembles that of L. bhutanus Ono, 2001, no matter in habitus nor copulatory organs, but it can be distinguished by the following: 1) the retrolateral tibial apophysis is widened at base and longer than the ventral tibial apophysis in retrolateral view (Fig.
The specific name is a patronym of the late Chinese arachnologist, Dr. Guo Tang, who has significantly contributed to the taxonomy of Chinese Lysiteles; noun (name) in genitive case.
Known only from the type locality in Xizang, China (Fig.
The pairing has been supported by the unpublished molecular evidence.
The manuscript benefitted greatly from comments by Hirotsugu Ono (Ibaraki, Japan), Yanfeng Tong (Shenyang, China), Zhiyuan Yao (Shenyang, China) and Hao Yu (Guiyang, China). We thank the six anonymous Cibagou National Nature Reserve forest rangers for helping with the fieldwork. This research was supported by the Scientific Monitoring of Cibagou National Nature Reserve Project, the National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC-32200369), the Science and Technology Project Foundation of Guizhou Province ([2020]1Z014), the Key Laboratory Project of Guizhou Province ([2020]2003), the Training Project of High-level Innovative Talents of Guizhou Province (2024-(2022)-050) and the Doctoral Research Foundation of Tongren University (trxyDH2102).