Biodiversity Data Journal : Data Paper (Biosciences)
PDF
Data Paper (Biosciences)
Biodiversity of testate amoebae in Sphagnum bogs: the dataset from forest-steppe ecotone (Middle Volga Territory, Russia)
expand article infoNailia M. Saldaeva‡,§, Kirill V. Babeshko‡,§, Viktor A. Chernyshov|, Anton S. Esaulov‡,|, Alexander A. Komarov|, Nikita R. Kriuchkov‡,§, Natalia G. Mazei§, Damir A. Saldaev, Tamara G. Stojko|, Andrey N. Tsyganov§, Yuri A. Mazei§,
‡ Shenzhen MSU-BIT University, Shenzhen, China
§ Lomonosov Moscow State University, Moscow, Russia
| Penza State University, Penza, Russia
Open Access

Abstract

Background

Testate amoebae are a polyphyletic group of unicellular eukaryotic organisms that are characterised by a rigid shell and inhabit mostly freshwater and terrestrial ecosystems. They are particularly abundant in peatlands, especially in Sphagnum-dominated biotopes. Peatland hydrology is the most important influence on testate amoebae communities. The good preservation of the shells in peat deposits and their response to hydrological regime changes are the principles for palaeohydrological reconstructions. Any changes in the water balance of mires should be expected to have far-reaching effects on biogeochemical cycles, productivity, carbon dioxide and methane exchange.

New information

This paper presents a dataset (Darwin Core Archive – DwC-A) on the distribution of Sphagnum-dwelling testate amoebae in nine mires located in the forest-steppe subzone of the East European Plane. The dataset includes information about 86 taxa belonging to 29 genera and contains 3,123 occurrences of 49,874 individuals. The following environmental variables are provided: microtopography, oxidising and reducing potential, total mineralisation, substrate temperature, acidity, substrate wetness and water table depth. These data might be used for biogeographical and palaeoecological studies, including quantitative reconstructions.

Keywords

the Volga Upland, peatlands, Arcellinida, Rhizaria

Introduction

Testate amoebae are eukaryotic unicellular organisms that are enclosed in a rigid cover called a shell or a test. The shell has one or two openings (pseudostome) through which filose or lobose pseudopodia protrude during locomotion and feeding (Cavalier-Smith 2004). It is a polyphyletic group within Supergroup Amoebozoa (Adl et al. 2019) related to Phylum Tubulinea (Smirnov et al. 2005) and Supergroup Sar related to Phylum Stramenopiles (Adl et al. 2005) and(?) Rhizaria (Cavalier-Smith 2004). Testate amoebae are particularly abundant in peatlands, where they can constitute up to 50% of microbial biomass (Gilbert and Mitchell 2006). Thus, studying the biodiversity of these organisms provides an important contribution to understanding the structure and functional role of microbial communities.

Testate amoebae are widely used in bioindication (Payne 2007) of water table depth and surface moisture in mires (Zheng et al. 2019, Krashevska et al. 2020, Swindles et al. 2020, Qin et al. 2021b, Šímová et al. 2022), organic matter content (Laggoun‐Défarge et al. 2007, Escobar et al. 2008, Daza et al. 2020), macronutrients (Wilkinson and Mitchell 2010, Patterson et al. 2012a), acidity (Payne 2009, Lamentowicz et al. 2011, Patterson et al. 2012b, Siver et al. 2020, Sim et al. 2021), metal ions concentration (Nguyen-Viet et al. 2006, Asada and Warner 2009, Cockburn et al. 2020) in aquatic environments, ecosystem restoration (Carballeira and Pontevedra-Pombal 2021, Qin et al. 2021a, Evans et al. 2023, Creevy et al. 2023) etc. Testate amoebae are successfully applied in quantitative reconstructions of hydrological regimes (Lamentowicz et al. 2017, Tsyganov et al. 2017, Swindles et al. 2019, Zhang et al. 2022), serving as a valuable proxy.

The growing number of available resources on these microorganisms allows for solving large-scale issues of biogeography and problems of flagship, endemic and eurybiotic species (Foissner 2006). The dataset presented in this paper represents the results of five years of investigations on testate amoebae in Sphagnum-dominated bogs of its southern boundary distribution in the forest-steppe ecotone (Tsyganov and Mazei 2007, Mazei and Tsyganov 2007a, Mazei and Tsyganov 2007b, Mazei et al. 2007a, Mazei et al. 2007b, Mazei and Bubnova 2007, Mazei and Bubnova 2008, Mazei and Bubnova 2009, Mazei et al. 2009, Tsyganov et al. 2016).

Project description

Design description: 

The description of each observation in the dataset is based on terms used in the general Darwin Core vocabulary. In the dataset, each observation includes basic information on the location (latitude and longitude), date of observation, name of the observer and number of counted individuals. The coordinates were determined in situ using a GPS device. For mire ecosystems, sampling locations contain information on microtopography (hummocks, lawns, hollows or not available), oxidising and reducing potential (redox), total mineralisation (tds), substrate temperature, acidity (pH), substrate wetness and mire water table depth (WTD) (Table 3).

Table 1.

Species diversity of testate amoeba families in the dataset.

Families

Number of genera

Number of taxa

Number of occu r rences

Amphitremidae Poche, 1913

1

1

109

Arcellidae Ehrenberg, 1843

2

18

442

Assulinidae Lara et al., 2007

2

4

460

Centropyxidae Jung, 1942

2

7

244

Cryptodifflugiidae Jung, 1942

1

1

12

Difflugiidae Wallich, 1864

1

11

139

Euglyphidae Wallich, 1864, emend. Lara et al., 2007

2

11

398

Heleoperidae Jung, 1942

1

3

172

Hyalospheniidae Schultze, 1877 emend. Kosakyan and Lara, 2012

4

6

598

Incertae sedis (Class: Tubulinea)

3

4

188

Lesquereusiidae Jung, 1942

1

3

9

Microchlamyiidae Ogden, 1985, emend. Kudryavtsev et Hausmann, 2007

1

1

3

Netzeliidae Kosakyan et al., 2016, emend. Gonzales-Miguens et al., 2021

2

6

82

Phryganellidae Jung, 1942

1

2

148

Pseudodifflugiidae De Saedeleer, 1934

1

1

1

Sphenoderiidae Chatelain et al., 2013

2

3

11

Trinematidae Hoogenraad & De Groot, 1940, emend Adl et al., 2012

2

4

107

Total

29

86

3123

Table 2.

Relative abundance (% to the total counts) and occurrences (samples) of testate amoebae forest-steppe ecotone (Middle Volga Territory, Russia). Species names are listed in the alphabetical order.

Species name

Abundance

Occurrence

1

Alabasta militaris (Penard, 1890) Duckert, Blandenier, Kosakyan et Singer 2018

0.50

57

2

Arcella conica Playfair, 1918

0.09

11

3

Arcella gibbosa Penard, 1890

0.35

20

4

Arcella hemisphaerica Perty, 1852

0.29

18

5

Arcella intermedia (Deflandre, 1928) Tsyganov et Mazei, 2006

0.81

39

6

Arcella mitrata Leidy, 1876

0.16

17

7

Arcella rotundata Playfair, 1918

0.40

25

8

Arcella vulgaris Ehrenberg, 1830

0.27

19

9

Arcella vulgaris penardi Deflandre, 1928

0.00

1

10

Arcella vulgaris polymorpha Deflandre, 1928

0.97

9

11

Arcella vulgaris undulata Deflandre, 1928

0.00

1

12

Archerella flavum (Archer, 1877) Loeblich et Tappan, 1961

2.07

109

13

Argynnia dentistoma Penard, 1890

0.01

1

14

Assulina muscorum Greeff, 1888

11.92

281

15

Assulina seminulum Ehrenberg, 1848

4.90

176

16

Bullinularia indica (Penard, 1907) Deflandre, 1953

0.52

56

17

Centropyxis aculeata (Ehrenberg, 1838) Stein, 1859

1.95

103

18

Centropyxis aerophila Deflandre, 1929

0.57

30

19

Centropyxis aerophila sphangicola Deflandre, 1929

0.79

45

20

Centropyxis constricta (Ehrenberg, 1841) Penard, 1890

0.00

3

21

Centropyxis ecornis (Ehrenberg, 1841) Leidy, 1879

0.01

4

22

Centropyxis spinosa Cash, 1905

0.15

3

23

Corythion dubium Taranek, 1871

0.53

31

24

Cryptodifflugia compressa Penard,1902

0.81

12

25

Cyclopyxis aplanata microstoma Schönborn, 1966

0.00

1

26

Cyclopyxis arcelloides (Penard, 1902) Deflandre, 1929

0.22

11

27

Cyclopyxis eurystoma Deflandre, 1929

0.93

49

28

Cyclopyxis kahli (Deflandre, 1929)

0.07

8

29

Difflugia bacillifera Penard, 1890

0.00

1

30

Difflugia brevicolla Cash et Hopkinson, 1909

0.00

1

31

Difflugia glans Penard, 1902

0.05

6

32

Difflugia globulosa Dujardin, 1837

0.68

26

33

Difflugia juzephiniensis Dekhtyar, 1993

0.46

27

34

Difflugia oblonga Ehrenberg, 1838

0.01

3

35

Difflugia parva (Thomas, 1954) Ogden, 1983

1.12

51

36

Difflugia pristis Penard, 1902

0.24

8

37

Difflugia pulex Penard, 1890

0.16

12

38

Difflugia pyriformis Perty, 1849

0.01

2

39

Difflugia urceolata Carter, 1864

0.01

2

40

Euglypha acanthophora Ehrenberg, 1841

0.01

3

41

Euglypha ciliata Ehrenberg, 1848

3.87

173

42

Euglypha ciliata glabra Wailes, 1915

0.94

49

43

Euglypha cristata Leidy, 1874

0.03

9

44

Euglypha cristata decora Jung, 1942

0.02

4

45

Euglypha laevis Ehrenberg, 1845

2.52

131

46

Euglypha strigosa (Ehrenberg, 1848) Leidy, 1878

0.15

11

47

Euglypha strigosa glabra Wailes, 1898

0.01

1

48

Euglypha strigosa heterospina Wailes, 1912

0.11

4

49

Euglypha tuberculata Dujardin, 1841

0.05

12

50

Galeripora arenaria (Greeff, 1866) González-Miguéns et al., 2021

7.28

127

51

Galeripora arenaria compressa (Chardez, 1957) González-Miguéns et al., 2021

0.06

5

52

Galeripora arenaria sphagnicola (Deflandre, 1928) González-Miguéns et al., 2021

0.07

8

53

Galeripora artocrea (Leidy, 1876) González-Miguéns et al., 2021

0.41

58

54

Galeripora catinus (Penard, 1890) González-Miguéns et al., 2021

2.36

60

55

Galeripora discoides (Ehrenberg, 1871) González-Miguéns et al., 2021

0.21

20

56

Galeripora megastoma (Penard, 1902) González-Miguéns et al., 2021

0.01

1

57

Galeripora polypora undulata (Decloitre, 1976) González-Miguéns et al., 2021

0.01

3

58

Gibbocarina galeata (Penard, 1890) Kosakyan et al., 2016

0.09

4

59

Heleopera petricola Leidy, 1879

1.09

36

60

Heleopera sphagni Leidy, 1874

6.83

124

61

Heleopera sylvatica Penard, 1890

0.07

12

62

Hyalosphenia elegans Leidy, 1874

5.71

136

63

Hyalosphenia papilio Leidy, 1874

11.74

185

64

Lesquereusia epistomium Penard, 1902

0.04

4

65

Lesquereusia inequalis Cash et Hopkinson, 1909

0.00

1

66

Lesquereusia spiralis Ehrenberg, 1840

0.02

4

67

Microchlamys patella (Claparède et Lachmann, 1859) Cockerell, 1911

0.12

3

68

Nebela collaris (Ehrenberg, 1848) sensu Kosakyan et Gomaa, 2013

0.46

30

69

Nebela tincta (Leidy, 1879) Awerintzew, 1906

7.00

186

70

Netzelia oviformis (Cash, 1909) Ogden, 1979

0.02

3

71

Netzelia tuberculata Wallich, 1864

0.10

10

72

Phryganella acropodia (Hertwig et Lesser, 1874) Hopkinson, 1909

0.32

30

73

Phryganella hemisphaerica Penard, 1902

6.74

118

74

Physochila tenella (Penard, 1893) Jung, 1942

7.49

130

75

Placocista glabra Penard, 1905

0.00

2

76

Placocista lens Penard, 1899

0.00

1

77

Pseudodifflugia gracilis Schlumberger, 1845

0.01

1

78

Scutiglypha scutigera (Penard, 1911) Foissner et Schiller, 2001

0.01

1

79

Sphenoderia fissirostris Penard, 1890

0.02

4

80

Sphenoderia lenta Schlumberger, 1845

0.03

3

81

Tracheleuglypha dentata (Vejdovsky, 1882) Deflandre, 1928

0.03

4

82

Trigonopyxis arcula Penard, 1912

0.44

46

83

Trigonopyxis minuta Schönborn et Peschke, 1988

0.21

11

84

Trinema complanatum Penard, 1890

0.18

15

85

Trinema enchelys Ehrenberg, 1838

0.48

28

86

Trinema lineare Penard, 1890

0.59

33

Table 3.

Environmental variables represented in the dataset.

Environmental variable Measurement unit Values range
oxidising and reducing potential (redox) mkSim/cm -(103)–290
total mineralisation (tds) mg/dm3 19–94
substrate temperature °C 13–28
acidity (pH) pH value 3.4–5.6
substrate wetness % 90.1–99.51
water table depth (WTD) cm 0–35

Sampling methods

Sampling description: 

Samples were generally collected in the biotopes dominated by Sphagnum spp. mosses and less frequently by Polytrichum spp. The sampling strategy tried to cover all the diversity of the microtopography of the mires (hummocks, lawns and hollows). Mosses were carefully extracted from the moss carpet and cut into layers according to the vertical zonation of peat soils: first from 0 to 15 cm by a 3 cm step and then the rest of the entire part of the dead mosses (Dobrovol’skii et al. 1998). After that, samples were placed in plastic containers and fixed with a formaldehyde solution in situ to avoid major post-sampling changes in the community structure (Mazei et al. 2015). Additional samples were taken for moisture content measurements. Water table depth (cm) was measured at each sampling point in a hole in relation to water on the surface of the moss cover after at least 30 minutes. Oxidising and reducing potential, total mineralisation, substrate temperature and pH value were measured using portable HANNA multiparameter meters in situ.

In the laboratory, samples were thoroughly shaken and stirred for 10 minutes in distilled water to extract testate amoebae. The suspension without Sphagnum stems was poured off to a Petri dish; live amoebae and empty tests were identified and counted separately in one-tenth part of the entire Petri dish using a stereomicroscope at 65× magnification. If necessary, the shells were transferred to a slide with a thin pipette, placed in a drop of glycerol and investigated at 150× or 300× magnification using a light microscope. A minimum count of 300 shells in each sample was achieved. The taxonomic classification at the genus level is based on the revisions of Kosakyan et al. (2016) as summarised in Tsyganov et al. (2016), González-Miguéns et al. (2021) and González-Miguéns et al. (2022). Moisture content was determined from additional samples taken in the field. Wet samples were weighed and placed in an oven at 105°C for eight hours. The samples were then cooled in a desiccator to room temperature and then weighed again. Percentage moisture was calculated, based on the difference between the wet and dry sample weights.

Geographic coverage

Description: 

The investigations were conducted from 2004 to 2006 in the Penza Region, Russia. The Penza Region is located in the west of the Volga Upland on the East European plain. It belongs to the forest-steppe subzone and the climate is temperate continental. The average annual air temperature in 2004–2006 is 5.8°C; precipitation is 627 mm (Weather and climate 2023). Nine mire ecosystems are included in this dataset (Fig. 1).

Figure 1.  

Map of the sampling sites. The numbers in the circles are mires, 1 – Bezymianoe; 2 – Svetloe; 3 – Kachim; 4 – Verkhozimskoe; 5 – Chibirley; 6 – Naskaftiym; 7 – Ivanovskoe; 8 – Sosnovoborsk; 9 – Kuncherovo.

Bezymianoe mire (53.30463°N, 45.13816°E) was sampled once a month from 20 May to 26 September 2004. The bog is circular and about 300 m in diameter. The vegetation of lawns is dominated by Calamagrostis canescens (Weber) Roth., Eriophorum vaginatum L. and Menyanthes trifoliata (L.). The centre of the mire is overgrown with Betula pubescens Ehrh. and Pinus sylvestris L., together with the shrub Myrtus communis L. The moss cover is flat, with the predominant species Sphagnum palustre L., S. divinum Flatberg & K. Hassel and S. angustifolium (C.E.O. Jensen ex Russow) C.E.O. Jensen. The hummocks in the middle of the mire are formed by S. papillosum Lindb. and S. angustifolium, Polytrichum strictum Brid. and Drosera rotundifolia L. Due to peat excavation, there is a drain channel at the edges of the mire and several ditches with open water in the centre, where Utricularia vulgaris L. and Sparganium minimum Wallr. were common. The edge of the Sphagnum quagmire is formed by S. riparium Ångstr.

Svetloe mire (53.33073°N, 46.82112°E) was sampled on 3 and 27 June 2004. It represents an overgrowing Sphagnum mat around the Svetloe Lake (the area is 7.2 ha). The lake shore is surrounded by reed vegetation composed of Calamagrostis canescens (up to 90%), Phragmites australis (Cav.) Trin. ex Steud., Carex riparia Curtis and a small amount of Betula pendula Roth. and Salix sp. Samples for testate amoebae were only collected in a Sphagnum-dominated mat with the presence of Pteridium aquilinum (L.) Kuhn, Melampyrum nemorosum L., Polygonatum odoratum (Mill.) Druce and Vaccinium myrtillus L.

Kachim mire (53.36187°N, 46.58564°E) was sampled on 27 June 2004. This is the largest oligotrophic mire in the region, with an area of 39.2 ha. The mire is round and surrounded by a drainage channel. Various Sphagnum mosses dominate (up to 70%) the vegetation cover, with E. vaginatum growing on hummocks. The tree cover is represented by the rare species B. pubescens and P. sylvestris. Andromeda polifolia L., Oxycoccus palustris Pers. and Drosera rotundifolia are occasionally found as well. The abundance of Carex spp., Comarum palustre L. and Naumburgia thyrsiflora (L.) Rchb. increases at the edge of the mire.

Verkhozimskoe mire (52.98561°N, 46.45928°E) was sampled on 28 June 2004. It represents a mire complex with a total area of 8.1 ha, separated by a drainage channel. Mires are covered with various Sphagnum and Polytrichum species. The hummocks in the central part are formed by Carex lasiocarpa Ehrh., C. vesicaria L., Eriophorum vaginatum and Drosera rotundifolia. The other grasses that might be observed in the mire are C. riparia, C. cinerea Poll., Carex omskiana Meinsh., Molinia caerulea (L.) Moench, Comarum palustre, Menyanthes trifoliata, Lysimachia vulgaris L., Naumburgia thyrsiflora and Galium palustre L., Pinus sylvestris, Betula pubescens and Myrtus communis are found sporadically. Utricularia vulgaris is found only in waterlogged drainage channels.

Chibirley mire (52.91076°N, 46.62264°E) was sampled in June 2004. The mire is covered predominantly by Sphagnum mosses (Sph. riparium, Sph. centrale C.E.O.Jensen, Sph. palustre and Sph. capillifolium (Ehrh.) Hedw.) and, less abundantly, by diverse Polytrichum species. There are Betula pubescens, B. humilis Schrank, Pinus sylvestris, Oxycoccus palustris and Chamaedaphne calyculata (L.) Moench. in the central part of the mire. Drosera rotundifolia was found on hummocks. Amongst the grasses, Carex rostrata Stokes, C. cinerea and Eriophorum polystachyon L. were observed. At the edge of the mire, the vegetation was formed by Calamagrostis canescens, Eriophorum vaginatum, Comarum palustre, Lysimachia thyrsiflora, Typha latifolia L. and Menyanthes trifoliata. Salix cinerea and S. aurita L. were found sporadically.

Naskaftiym mire (52.93960°N, 45.47969°E) was sampled on 15 July 2004. It is a round bog (10 ha) that is completely covered by Sphagnum mosses (Sph. centrale, Sph. fallax (H.Klinggr.) H.Klinggr., Sph. flexuosum Dozy & Molk., Sph. girgensohnii Russow and Sph. obtusum Warnst.). The surface of the mire is relatively flat. Grasses are represented by Carex limosa L., C. cespitosa L., C. hartmaniorum Cajander, C. rostrata, Eriophorum angustifolium Honck., E. gracile W.D.J. Koch, E. vaginatum, Calamagrostis canescens and Phragmites australis. Comarum palustre, Equisetum fluviatile L., Peucedanum palustre (L.) Moench. and Menyanthes trifoliata are also found. Shrub Salix lapponum L. and trees of Betula pubescens are very rare.

Ivanovskoe mire (52.70788°N, 45.82308°E) was sampled on 28 July 2004. It represents a lake that is formed as a result of peat excavations in a mire and is overgrown by a Sphagnum-dominated mat. The area of the mire is 25 ha. The following types of mosses are found: Sphagnum riparium, Sph. squarrosum Crome and Sph. papillosum. The other mat-forming plants are Comarum palustre, Menyanthes trifoliata, Carex spp., Typha latifolia, Phragmites australis, Betula pubescens and Salix cinerea.

Sosnovoborsk mire (53.31500°N, 46.19544°E) was sampled on 5 June 2005. It represents a waterlogged pine forest with shallow peat deposits. The tree cover is generally composed of Pinus sylvestris with an admixture of Betula pubescens, Frangula alnus Mill., Sorbus aucuparia L. and Chamaecytisus ruthenicus (Fisch. ex Woloszcz.) Klásk. The shrubs and herbs are Vaccinium myrtillus, Vaccinium vitis-idaea L. and Rubus saxatilis L. The ground cover is formed by Lycopodium annotinum L., L. clavatum L., Diphasisastrum complanatum (L.) Holub., Luzula pilosa (L.) Willd. and Pteridium aquilinum. Mosses are Polytrichum commune Hedw., Sphagnum denticulatum Brid., Sph. girgensohnii, Sph. centrale, Sph. russowii Warnst. and Sph. divinum.

Kuncherovo mire (53.34832°N, 46.83608°E) was sampled on 4 July 2006. This is a round in shape, mesotrophic mire with an area of 2 ha. At the edges, Salix sp. and hummocks formed by Carex canescens L. were found. The central part is composed of Betula pubescens, Eriophorum vaginatum and a well-developed Sphagnum moss cover. Scheuchzeria palustris L., Comarum palustre and Menyanthes trifoliata are rare. Sphagnum moss cover is composed of Sph. divinum, Sph. angustifolium and Sph. squarrosum.

Coordinates: 

52.70788°N and 53.36187°N Latitude; 45.13816°E and 46.83608°E Longitude.

Taxonomic coverage

Description: 

The dataset represents information on the distribution of 86 species of testate amoebae in Sphagnum-dominated bogs in the forest-steppe ecotone. There are a total of 29 genera, which belong to 16 families and three incertae sedis ranks (Table 1). In total, 49,238 individuals were identified with 3,123 occurrences (Kriuchkov et al. 2023). The greatest number of genera were in the families Hyalospheniidae (4) and incertae sedis (3), including Argynnia, Physochila and Trigonopyxis. Families Arcellidae, Assulinidae, Centropyxidae, Euglyphidae, Netzeliidae and Trinematidae include two genera and all the others contain only one. The largest number of taxa were found in Arcellidae (18), Difflugiidae (11) and Euglyphidae (11).

The most abundant species in the dataset (Table 2) are Assulina muscorum (11.9% of the total number of counted individuals), which also has the highest occurrence (281). The species Hyalosphenia papilio (11.7%) is almost equally abundant as the previous one, whereas the other species had lower abundances: Physochila tenella (7.5%), Galeripora arenaria (7.3%), Nebela tincta (7.0%), Heleopera sphagni (6.8%), Phryganella hemisphaerica (6.7%), Hyalosphenia elegans (5.7%), Assulina seminulum (5.0%), Euglypha ciliata (3.9%), Euglypha laevis (2.5%), Galeripora catinus (2.4%), Archerella flavum (2.1%), Centropyxis aculeata (2.0%), Difflugia parva (1.1%) and Heleopera petricola (1.1%). A total of 20 taxa are less abundant than 0.02% and are assumed to be rare: Lesquereusia spiralis, Euglypha cristata decora, Sphenoderia fissirostris, Galeripora polypora, Difflugia urceolata, Pseudodifflugia gracilis, Difflugia oblonga, Galeripora megastoma, Difflugia pyriformis, Scutiglypha scutigera, Argynnia dentistoma, Centropyxis ecornis, Euglypha acanthophora, Euglypha strigosa glabra, Placocista glabra, Centropyxis constricta, Cyclopyxis aplanata microstoma, Difflugia bacillifera, Placocista lens, Difflugia brevicolla, Arcella vulgaris undulata, Arcella vulgaris penardi and Lesquereusia inequalis. The following species were found in more than a third part of all sample sets: A. muscorum (281), N. tincta (186), H. papilio (185), A. seminulum (176), E. ciliata (173), H. elegans (136), E. laevis (131), P. tenella (130), G. arenaria (127), H. sphagni (124), P. hemisphaerica (118), A. flavum (109) and C. aculeata (103). There are 12 species that were observed only once: Pseudodifflugia gracilis, Galeripora megastoma, Scutiglypha scutigera, Argynnia dentistoma, Euglypha strigosa glabra, Cyclopyxis aplanata microstoma, Difflugia bacillifera, Placocista lens, Difflugia brevicolla, Arcella vulgaris undulata, Arcella vulgaris penardi and Lesquereusia inequalis.

Usage licence

Usage licence: 
Other
IP rights notes: 

Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial (CC-BY-NC) 4.0 Licence

Data resources

Data package title: 
The dataset on terrestrial testate amoebae from forest-steppe ecotone (Middle Volga Territory, Russia) in 2004–2006.
Number of data sets: 
1
Data set name: 
The dataset on terrestrial testate amoebae from forest-steppe ecotone (Middle Volga Territory, Russia) in 2004–2006
Description: 

The description of each observation in the dataset is based on terms used in the general Darwin Core vocabulary (GBIF.org 2023). In the dataset, each observation includes basic information on the location (latitude and longitude), date of observation, name of the observer and number of counted individuals. The coordinates were determined in situ using a GPS device. The dataset is structured using the Occurrences and Extended Measurements or Facts (eMoF) extension. The Extended Measurement or Fact table contains the fields listed in the table below. Sampling locations of mires contain information (i.e. measurementType) on microtopography (hummocks, lawns, hollows or not available), oxidising and reducing potential (redox), total mineralisation (tds), substrate temperature, acidity (pH), substrate wetness and mire water table depth (WTD).

Column label Column description
eventID (Occurrence) An identifier for the set of information associated with an Event.
parentEventID (Occurrence) An identifier for the broad event of place and year.
samplingProtocol (Occurrence) Descriptions of the methods and protocols used for material sampling.
samplingEffort (Occurrence) The amount of effort expended during sampling procedure.
sampleSizeValue (Occurrence) A numeric value for a measurement of the size (volume) of a sample.
sampleSizeUnit (Occurrence) Cubic centimetre.
occurrenceID (Occurrence, eMoF) An identifier for the occurrence (as opposed to a particular digital record of the occurrence).
eventDate (Occurrence) The date when material was collected or sampling period.
basisOfRecord (Occurrence) The specific nature of the data record.
kingdom (Occurrence) The full scientific name of the Kingdom in which the taxon is classified.
scientificName (Occurrence) The full scientific name, including the genus name and the lowest level of taxonomic rank with the authority.
habitat (Occurrence) Notes about the dcterms:Location (microtopography, including hummocks, lawns and hollows).
family (Occurrence) The full scientific name of the Family in which the taxon is classified.
class (Occurrence) The full scientific name of the Class in which the taxon is classified.
taxonRank (Occurrence) The taxonomic rank of the most specific name in the scientificName.
decimalLatitude (Occurrence) The geographic latitude of location in decimal degrees.
decimalLongitude (Occurrence) The geographic longitude of location in decimal degrees.
countryCode (Occurrence) The standard code for the country in which the location is found, Russia (RU).
individualCount (Occurrence) The number of individuals present at the time of the occurrence.
organismQuantity (Occurrence) A number or enumeration value for the quantity of organisms.
organismQuantityType (Occurrence) The type of quantification system used for the quantity of organisms (counted shells).
verbatimDepth (Occurrence) The original description of the depth below the local surface (sampling depth from Sphagnum stems).
measurementType (eMoF) The nature of the measurement, fact, characteristic or assertion (redox, total mineralisation, substrate temperature, pH, water table depth, substrate moisture).
measurementUnit (eMoF) The units associated with the dwc:measurementValue (mV, mkSim/cm, °C, pH value, cm, %).
measurementValue (eMoF) The value of the redox, total mineralisation, substrate temperature, pH, water table depth and substrate moisture measurement.
geodeticDatum (Occurrence) WGS84
coordinateUncertaintyInMetres (Occurrence) Coordinate uncertainty in metres (10).
coordinatePrecision (Occurrence) A decimal representation of the precision of the coordinates (0.00001).
stateProvince (Occurrence) The name of the next smaller administrative region than country (Penza Region).
minimumDepthInMetres (Occurrence) The lesser depth of a range of depth below the local surface, in metres.
maximumDepthInMetres (Occurrence) The greater depth of a range of depth below the local surface, in metres.
taxonRemarks (Occurrence) Notes about the taxon valid name.
country The name of the country or major administrative unit in which the Location occurs.

References

login to comment