Biodiversity Data Journal : Data Paper (Biosciences)
PDF
Data Paper (Biosciences)
Bees of the Mediterranean basin: biodiversity insights from specimens in the IMBE collection (Marseille, France)
expand article infoLouhane Schneider, Charlène Lossouarn, Benoît Geslin§,‡,|,¶,#,¤, Coline C. Jaworski§,‡,|,¶,#, Lucie Schurr§,¶,#,|,«, Lise Ropars», Claire Bouchot§,‡,|,¶,#, Marie Zakardjian§,‡,|,¶,#, Floriane Flacher§,|,¶,#, Matthieu Aubert˄, David Genoud˅, Éric Dufrêne˄, Vincent Leclercq˄, Gabriel Nève§,‡,|,¶,#
‡ Aix Marseille University, Marseille, France
§ IMBE, Marseille, France
| Avignon University, Avignon, France
¶ CNRS, Marseille, France
# IRD, Marseille, France
¤ Rennes University, Rennes, France
« Institute of Ecology and Environmental Sciences, Sorbonne Université, Paris, France
» MNHN, Paris, France
˄ Observatoire des Abeilles, Flines-lez-Raches, France
˅ Independant researcher, Ambazac, France
Open Access

Abstract

Background

The spectacular decline in pollinators and their prominent role in pollination of natural and cultivated plants has stimulated research on pollinating insects. Over the last ten years, much ecological research has been carried out on bees, often generating a large volume of specimens and increasing the importance of entomological collections. Here, we present the bee collection of the IMBE laboratory (Marseille, France) after ten years of study of plant-pollinator networks.

New information

We provide distribution data on 2181 specimens belonging to 246 species of bees, mainly from the Mediterranean Region of France. One of the recorded species, Lasioglossum soror, is classified as "endangered" at the European level, while 68 of the recorded species are currently Data Deficient according to the 2014 Red List of European bees. This dataset contributes to the broader effort to enhance the knowledge of French bee diversity. It aligns with the objectives of the French Pollinator Plan and supports the development of a national Red List. In this context, information about the distribution of wild bees from the Mediterranean Region, which harbours the highest species diversity in mainland France, are of particular importance.

Keywords

Hymenoptera, Apoidea, distribution, France, Andrenidae, Apidae, Colletidae, Halictidae, Megachilidae, Melittidae

Introduction

Dramatic declines in many pollinator populations have been documented worldwide (Raven and Wagner 2021) raising concerns about the maintenance of their species through time and space and the sustainability of the ecosystem services they provide. In this context, accurate data on pollinator distribution is crucial to document their current status. Amongst these, specimens preserved in natural history collections are reliable pieces of the puzzle that describes ecological communities, habitats and ecosystem health (Raven and Miller 2020). Opening these collections and making them accessible through digitisation and publication is, therefore, of paramount importance for generating science-driven conservation strategies.

Over the past decades, researchers at the Mediterranean Institute of marine and continental Biodiversity and Ecology (IMBE) in Marseille have been investigating relationships between pollinators and plants across a variety of habitats in France, with a focus on the Bouches-du-Rhône Department (Schurr et al. 2019, Ropars et al. 2020a, Ropars et al. 2020b, Schurr et al. 2021, Schurr et al. 2022, Carisio et al. 2022, Jaworski et al. 2022, Badiane et al. 2024). Several projects have been undertaken by the Institute, including field courses on bee identification (Geslin et al. 2018) and field campaigns in the Calanques National Park and the City of Marseille. These campaigns used standardised sampling protocols such as netting, pan-trapping and trap-nesting (insect hotels, Geslin et al. (2020)). This work generated the collection of many specimens that have been kept in the IMBE since 2015. Additionally, some specimens were sent to enrich the collection from some of the renowned professional taxonomists of France (namely M. Aubert, E. Dufrêne and D. Genoud). Each of the specimens collected has been meticulously pinned, labelled and was frozen at least twice a year to avoid the emergence of pests.

This paper aims to publish the raw data of bee specimens currently housed in the IMBE collections. These include specimens collected during studies, as well as those donated to the Institute, with the exception of specimens provided to professional taxonomists, lost, destroyed during preparation or used for DNA sequencing, representing a small fraction of the collection. This dataset serves as a valuable resource for advancing our understanding of the Mediterranean Basin's bee fauna and supports ongoing efforts to develop national checklists and Red Lists.

General description

Purpose: 

The dataset presented here includes information on a total of 2,181 bee specimens, collected between 2003 and 2023, all identified to the species level, along with detailed information on the date and location of each capture. This dataset includes some Mediterranean species for which few published records are available in national (inpn.mnhn.fr) and international (www.gbif.org) databases.

Additional information: 

The project aims to compile all recorded data on Apoidea, collected during field campaigns and from donations over the past 10 years, as well as opportunistic captures sent by entomologists to the IMBE laboratory. A total of three scientific field campaigns were conducted in the protected area of the Calanques National Park (Geslin et al. 2018, Ropars et al. 2018, Schurr et al. 2019), two in the urban parks of Marseille (Geslin et al. 2020, Badiane et al. 2024), one in humid area (Solère et al. 2022) and three within the Alpes-de-Haute-Provence Regional Park (Schurr et al. 2021, Carisio et al. 2022, Schurr et al. 2022). A few additional specimens were gathered elsewhere in France, Spain and Italy and sent to the IMBE.

Sampling methods

Sampling description: 

For each specimen, the following information was retrieved: species, date and location of capture, sex and collector, as well as any relevant ecological data, such as the plant on which the specimen was captured. Specimens were captured with an entomological net or with coloured pan traps. In addition to the data on the original labels, each specimen was assigned a unique identification code written on an added label.

Quality control: 

The specimens were identified by Mathieu Aubert, Claire Bouchot, Eric Dufrêne, Benoît Geslin, Vincent Leclercq, Lise Ropars, Lucie Schurr, Erwin Scheuchl, Benoît Martha, Emile Gigandet, Gilles Mahé, Yvan Brugerolles, Gérard Le Goff and Nicolas J. Vereecken. The taxonomy was checked to be compatible with the French TAXREF v.17,0 from the Museum national d’Histoire naturelle (Paris) data base (Gargominy et al. 2021) and with the latest checklist of the bees of the French fauna (Ropars et al. in press). In case of name change due to taxonomic update or identification correction, the original name given to the specimen was retained in the 'previousIdentifications' column.

Step description: 

All data on the 2181 identified specimens currently in the IMBE collection were input in a table format. Latitude and longitude coordinates of each capture location were obtained either directly from the label or inferred from the location description. In the second case, coordinates were retrieved using the geoportail.gouv.fr website. Coordinates originally in Lambert93 format and in degrees minutes seconds were transformed to standard GPS format (latitude and longitude in decimal degrees). The locations were then verified using the https://www.geoportail.gouv.fr/ website. Coordinates uncertainty (‘coordinateUncertaintyInMeters’ column) was set to at least 100 m, depending on the level of detail provided on the capture location on the specimen label. All formats follow GBIF Darwin Core specification, to ensure interoperability with other international databases.

For 32 specimens, only identification to the genus level was possible. This is indicated by a value of 0 in the ‘identificationVerificationStatus’ column, with relevant additional details provided in the ‘identificationRemarks’ column. Species groups were indicated with ‘gr.’ in the ‘identificationQualifier’ column, such as for the Bombus terrestris species group, which requires genetic data for accurate species-level identification (Murray et al. 2008). ‘cf.’ was used to indicate an approximate identification. This was the case of some Hylaeus specimens which could only be assigned to a couple of species: H. pictipes or H. taeniolatus.

All data were entered in CSV format, with the fields separated by tabs and encoded in UTF-8, thus following the protocol compatible with the GBIF database (Global Biodiversity Information Facility, https://www.gbif.org/fr/) as used in previously published datasets (Meunier et al. 2023, Nève et al. 2024, Ollivier et al. 2024).

Geographic coverage

Description: 

Most of the specimens come from France (2178), one is from Spain and two are from Italy.

In France, 93% the data come from the Bouches-du-Rhône Department, with some from Var, Alpes-Maritimes and Alpes-de-Haute-Provence (Fig. 1; Suppl. material 1).

Figure 1.  

Distribution of Anthophila specimens in the IMBE collection. Specimens from the Departments of Yvelines (n = 13), Seine-et-Marne (n = 4), Manche (n = 2) and Essonne (n = 8) are omitted. One specimen from Spain and two from Italy are omitted.

Coordinates: 

39.30 and 49.33 Latitude; -1.28 and 9.20 Longitude.

Taxonomic coverage

Description: 

The dataset covers 246 species of Apoidea belonging to the six bee families found in France: Andrenidae, Apidae, Colletidae, Halictidae, Megachilidae and Melittidae (Tables 1, 2).

Table 1.

Numbers of species and specimens per family in the IMBE Anthophila collection.

Family Number of species Number of specimens
Andrenidae

47

301
Apidae 73 649
Colletidae 19 80
Halictidae 44 318
Megachilidae 61 831
Melittidae 2 2
Total 246 2181
Table 2.

Number of specimens per species in the IMBE Anthophila collection. Nomenclature follows Ropars et al. (in press). European Red List status follows Nieto et al. (2014). DD: Data Deficient, EN: Endangered, LC: Low Concern, NT: Near Threatened. Megachile scupturalis was not assessed in the Red List as it is an introduced species (Le Féon et al. 2018).

Family Species European Red List status Number of specimens
Andrenidae Andrena agilissima (Scopoli, 1770) DD 2
Andrenidae Andrena angustior Kirby, 1802 DD 1
Andrenidae Andrena bicolor Fabricius, 1775 LC 9
Andrenidae Andrena bimaculata Kirby, 1802 DD 2
Andrenidae Andrena chrysosceles (Kirby, 1802) DD 1
Andrenidae Andrena cineraria Linnaeus, 1758 LC 2
Andrenidae Andrena cinerea Brullé, 1832 DD 1
Andrenidae Andrena combinata (Christ, 1791) DD 14
Andrenidae Andrena dorsata (Kirby, 1802) DD 3
Andrenidae Andrena fabrella Pérez, 1903 DD 10
Andrenidae Andrena falsifica Perkins, 1915 DD 1
Andrenidae Andrena flavipes Panzer, 1799 LC 3
Andrenidae Andrena fulva (Müller, 1766) DD 1
Andrenidae Andrena fuscipes (Kirby, 1802) DD 2
Andrenidae Andrena haemorrhoa (Fabricius, 1781) LC 2
Andrenidae Andrena hesperia Smith, 1853 LC 17
Andrenidae Andrena humilis Imhoff, 1832 DD 1
Andrenidae Andrena labiata Fabricius, 1781 DD 1
Andrenidae Andrena lagopus Latreille, 1809 LC 10
Andrenidae Andrena limbata Eversmann, 1852 DD 1
Andrenidae Andrena marginata Fabricius, 1776 DD 1
Andrenidae Andrena minutula Kirby, 1802 DD 2
Andrenidae Andrena morio Brullé, 1832 DD 1
Andrenidae Andrena nigroaenea Kirby, 1802 LC 58
Andrenidae Andrena nitida Müller, 1776 LC 1
Andrenidae Andrena niveata Friese, 1887 DD 28
Andrenidae Andrena ovatula Kirby, 1802 NT 3
Andrenidae Andrena pandellei Pérez, 1895 LC 2
Andrenidae Andrena pilipes Fabricius, 1781 LC 1
Andrenidae Andrena polita Smith, 1847 LC 1
Andrenidae Andrena praecox (Scopoli, 1763) LC 1
Andrenidae Andrena pusilla Pérez, 1903 DD 2
Andrenidae Andrena rhenana Stöckhert in Schmiedeknecht, 1930 DD 10
Andrenidae Andrena rufula Schmiedeknecht, 1883 LC 1
Andrenidae Andrena senecionis Pérez, 1895 LC 8
Andrenidae Andrena similis Smith, 1849 DD 19
Andrenidae Andrena simillima Smith, 1851 LC 1
Andrenidae Andrena simontornyella Noskiewicz, 1939 LC 1
Andrenidae Andrena spreta Pérez, 1895 DD 2
Andrenidae Andrena subopaca Nylander, 1848 LC 1
Andrenidae Andrena tenuistriata Pérez, 1895 LC 3
Andrenidae Andrena truncatilabris Morawitz, 1877 DD 1
Andrenidae Andrena vaga Panzer, 1799 LC 1
Andrenidae Andrena vetula Lepeletier, 1841 LC 1
Andrenidae Andrena villipes Pérez, 1895 LC 4
Andrenidae Andrena vulpecula Kriechbaumer, 1873 DD 33
Andrenidae Panurgus dentipes Latreille, 1811 LC 30
Apidae Amegilla albigena (Lepeletier, 1841) LC 3
Apidae Amegilla garrula (Rossi, 1790) LC 1
Apidae Ammobatoides scriptus (Gerstäcker, 1869) DD 1
Apidae Anthophora aestivalis (Panzer, 1801) LC 5
Apidae Anthophora affinis Lepeletier, 1841 DD 11
Apidae Anthophora atriceps Pérez, 1879 DD 1
Apidae Anthophora bimaculata (Panzer, 1798) LC 7
Apidae

Anthophora crassipes Lepeletier, 1841

DD 1
Apidae Anthophora crinipes Smith, 1854 DD 13
Apidae Anthophora dispar Lepeletier, 1841 LC 64
Apidae Anthophora femorata (Olivier, 1789) DD 4
Apidae Anthophora mucida Gribodo, 1873 DD 8
Apidae Anthophora plumipes (Pallas, 1772) LC 73
Apidae Apis mellifera Linnaeus, 1758 DD 90
Apidae Bombus hortorum (Linnaeus, 1761) LC 2
Apidae Bombus humilis Illiger, 1806 LC 5
Apidae Bombus lucorum (Linnaeus, 1761) LC 6
Apidae Bombus mastrucatus Gerstäcker, 1869 LC 2
Apidae Bombus mesomelas Gerstäcker, 1869 LC 5
Apidae Bombus monticola Smith, 1849 LC 4
Apidae Bombus pascuorum (Scopoli, 1763) LC 33
Apidae Bombus pratorum Linnaeus, 1758 LC 4
Apidae Bombus ruderarius (Müller, 1776) LC 2
Apidae Bombus sichelii Radoszkowski, 1859 LC 1
Apidae Bombus soroeensis (Fabricius, 1777) LC 2
Apidae Bombus sylvarum (Linnaeus, 1761) LC 2
Apidae Bombus terrestris Linnaeus, 1758 LC 47
Apidae Ceratina chalcites Germar, 1839 LC 2
Apidae Ceratina cucurbitina Rossi, 1792 LC 13
Apidae Ceratina cyanea (Kirby, 1802) LC 12
Apidae Ceratina dallatorreana Friese, 1896 LC 1
Apidae Ceratina dentiventris Gerstäcker, 1869 LC 4
Apidae Ceratina gravidula Gerstäcker, 1869 LC 2
Apidae Ceratina nigrolabiata Friese, 1896 LC 6
Apidae Epeolus julliani Pérez, 1884 LC 1
Apidae Eucera caspica Morawitz, 1873 LC 89
Apidae Eucera clypeata Erichson, 1835 LC 3
Apidae Eucera hispana Lepeletier, 1841 DD 8
Apidae Eucera interrupta Baer, 1850 LC 1
Apidae Eucera longicornis (Linnaeus, 1758) LC 1
Apidae Eucera nigrescens Pérez, 1880 LC 4
Apidae Eucera nigrifacies Lepeletier, 1841 LC 5
Apidae Eucera nigrilabris Lepeletier, 1841 DD 1
Apidae Eucera rufa (Lepeletier, 1841) DD 1
Apidae Eucera taurica Morawitz, 1871 DD 2
Apidae Eucera vulpes Brullé, 1832 DD 1
Apidae Melecta albifrons (Förster, 1771) LC 1
Apidae Melecta italica Radoszkowski, 1876 DD 2
Apidae Nomada beaumonti Schwarz, 1967 LC 3
Apidae Nomada bluethgeni Stoeckhert, 1943 LC 1
Apidae Nomada discedens Pérez, 1884 LC 9
Apidae Nomada discrepans Schmiedeknecht, 1882 LC 2
Apidae Nomada distinguenda Morawitz, 1873 LC 1
Apidae Nomada fabriciana (Linnaeus, 1767) LC 1
Apidae Nomada facilis Schwarz, 1967 LC 1
Apidae Nomada femoralis Morawitz, 1869 LC 1
Apidae Nomada flavoguttata (Kirby, 1802) LC 11
Apidae Nomada fulvicornis Fabricius, 1792 LC 1
Apidae Nomada furvoides Stöckhert, 1944 DD 1
Apidae Nomada goodeniana (Kirby, 1802) LC 1
Apidae Nomada integra Brullé, 1832 LC 3
Apidae Nomada maculicornis Pérez, 1884 DD 4
Apidae Nomada marshamella (Kirby, 1802) LC 1
Apidae Nomada mocsaryi Schmiedeknecht, 1882 DD 1
Apidae Nomada panurgina Morawitz, 1868 LC 4
Apidae Nomada sheppardana (Kirby, 1802) LC 20
Apidae Nomada succincta Panzer, 1798 LC 10
Apidae Tetralonia fulvescens (Giraud, 1863) DD 1
Apidae Tetralonia malvae (Rossi, 1790) LC 1
Apidae Tetralonia nana Morawitz, 1874 DD 2
Apidae Tetralonia strigata (Lepeletier, 1841) DD 1
Apidae Xylocopa iris (Christ, 1791) LC 1
Apidae Xylocopa violacea (Linnaeus, 1758) LC 10
Colletidae Colletes albomaculatus (Lucas, 1848) NT 5
Colletidae Colletes similis Schenck, 1853 LC 1
Colletidae Hylaeus angustatus (Schenck, 1859) LC 1
Colletidae Hylaeus brachycephalus (Morawitz, 1868) DD 1
Colletidae Hylaeus brevicornis Nylander, 1852 LC 2
Colletidae Hylaeus clypearis (Schenck, 1853) LC 15
Colletidae Hylaeus communis Nylander, 1852 LC 2
Colletidae Hylaeus confusus Nylander, 1852 LC 1
Colletidae Hylaeus gibbus Saunders, 1850 LC 8
Colletidae Hylaeus hyalinatus Smith, 1842 LC 5
Colletidae Hylaeus imparilis Förster, 1871 LC 3
Colletidae Hylaeus leptocephalus Morawitz, 1870 LC 1
Colletidae Hylaeus lineolatus (Schenck, 1861) LC 1
Colletidae Hylaeus pfankuchi (Alfken, 1919) LC 1
Colletidae Hylaeus pictipes Nylander, 1852 LC 9
Colletidae Hylaeus pictus (Smith, 1853) DD 12
Colletidae Hylaeus punctatus Brullé, 1832 LC 6
Colletidae Hylaeus signatus Panzer, 1798 LC 1
Colletidae Hylaeus variegatus Fabricius, 1798 LC 5
Halictidae Halictus brunnescens (Eversmann, 1852) DD 1
Halictidae Halictus crenicornis Bluthgen, 1923 DD 2
Halictidae Halictus fulvipes (Klug in Germar, 1817) LC 5
Halictidae Halictus maculatus Smith, 1848 LC 1
Halictidae Halictus patellatus Morawitz, 1873 LC 3
Halictidae Halictus scabiosae (Rossi, 1790) LC 11
Halictidae Halictus simplex Bluthgen, 1923 LC 12
Halictidae Lasioglossum albocinctum (Lucas, 1849) LC 4
Halictidae Lasioglossum bimaculatum (Dours, 1872) LC 31
Halictidae Lasioglossum bluethgeni Ebmer, 1971 LC 2
Halictidae Lasioglossum glabriusculum Morawitz, 1872 LC 4
Halictidae Lasioglossum griseolum Morawitz, 1872 LC 2
Halictidae Lasioglossum ibericum (Ebmer, 1975) DD 1
Halictidae Lasioglossum laticeps (Schenck, 1868) LC 2
Halictidae Lasioglossum limbellum Morawitz, 1872 DD 1
Halictidae Lasioglossum lineare (Schenck, 1869) DD 1
Halictidae Lasioglossum malachurum Kirby, 1802 LC 28
Halictidae Lasioglossum mediterraneum Bluthgen, 1926 LC 10
Halictidae Lasioglossum mesosclerum Pérez, 1903 DD 3
Halictidae Lasioglossum minutissimum Kirby, 1802 LC 2
Halictidae Lasioglossum morio (Fabricius, 1793) LC 6
Halictidae Lasioglossum nigripes Lepeletier, 1841 LC 1
Halictidae Lasioglossum nitidulum Fabricius, 1804 LC 16
Halictidae Lasioglossum pauperatum Brullé, 1832 LC 1
Halictidae Lasioglossum pauxillum (Schenck, 1853) LC 3
Halictidae Lasioglossum politum Schenck, 1853 LC 1
Halictidae Lasioglossum prasinum Smith, 1848 NT 1
Halictidae Lasioglossum pygmaeum (Schenck, 1853) NT 18
Halictidae Lasioglossum sexnotatum (Kirby, 1802) NT 2
Halictidae Lasioglossum soror (Saunders, 1901) EN 21
Halictidae Lasioglossum subhirtum (Lepeletier, 1841) LC 3
Halictidae Lasioglossum transitorium (Schenck, 1869) LC 96
Halictidae Lasioglossum villosulum Kirby, 1802 LC 1
Halictidae Lasioglossum zonulum (Smith, 1848) LC 2
Halictidae Nomiapis diversipes (Latreille, 1806) LC 2
Halictidae Seladonia confusa (Smith, 1853) LC 1
Halictidae Seladonia gemmea (Dours, 1872) LC 5
Halictidae Seladonia pollinosa (Sichel, 1860) LC 1
Halictidae Seladonia smaragdula (Vachal, 1895) LC 4
Halictidae Seladonia subaurata (Rossi, 1792) LC 2
Halictidae Seladonia vestita (Lepeletier, 1841) LC 2
Halictidae Sphecodes ephippius (Linnaeus, 1767) LC 1
Halictidae Sphecodes pellucidus Smith, 1845 LC 1
Halictidae Sphecodes ruficrus (Erichson, 1835) LC 1
Megachilidae Anthidiellum strigatum Panzer, 1805 LC 9
Megachilidae Anthidium diadema Latreille, 1809 DD 1
Megachilidae Anthidium florentinum Fabricius, 1775 LC 12
Megachilidae Anthidium loti Perris, 1852 DD 4
Megachilidae Anthidium manicatum (Linnaeus, 1758) LC 14
Megachilidae Anthidium oblongatum Immigur, 1806 LC 6
Megachilidae Chelostoma distinctum Stoeckhert, 1929 LC 2
Megachilidae Chelostoma florisomne Linnaeus, 1758 LC 4
Megachilidae Chelostoma rapunculi (Lepeletier, 1841) LC 1
Megachilidae Heriades crenulata Nylander, 1856 LC 14
Megachilidae Heriades truncorum Linnaeus, 1758 LC 16
Megachilidae Hoplitis acuticornis (Dufour & Perris, 1840) LC 1
Megachilidae Hoplitis adunca Panzer, 1798 LC 32
Megachilidae Hoplitis anthocopoides Schenck, 1853 LC 6
Megachilidae Hoplitis benoisti Alfken, 1935 LC 15
Megachilidae Hoplitis bisulca (Gerstäcker, 1869) LC 1
Megachilidae Hoplitis brachypogon (Pérez, 1880) LC 1
Megachilidae Hoplitis cristatula (Van der Zanden, 1990) LC 11
Megachilidae Hoplitis leucomelana (Kirby, 1802) LC 1
Megachilidae Hoplitis mocsaryi (Friese, 1895) LC 1
Megachilidae Hoplitis perezi (Ferton, 1895) LC 1
Megachilidae Megachile apicalis (Spinola, 1808) LC 3
Megachilidae Megachile argentata Alfken, 1924 LC 6
Megachilidae Megachile centuncularis Linnaeus, 1758 LC 6
Megachilidae Megachile ericetorum Lepeletier, 1841 LC 3
Megachilidae Megachile flabellipes Perez, 1895 DD 1
Megachilidae Megachile giraudi Gerstäcker, 1869 DD 1
Megachilidae Megachile leachella Curtis, 1828 LC 1
Megachilidae Megachile maritima (Kirby, 1802) DD 1
Megachilidae Megachile melanopyga Costa, 1863 LC 6
Megachilidae Megachile opacifrons Pérez, 1897 DD 1
Megachilidae Megachile parietina (Geoffroy in Fourcroy, 1785) LC 12
Megachilidae Megachile pusilla Pérez, 1884 DD 2
Megachilidae Megachile pyrenaica Lepeletier, 1841 DD 4
Megachilidae Megachile rotundata (Fabricius, 1793) DD 4
Megachilidae Megachile sculpturalis Smith, 1853 6
Megachilidae Megachile willughbiella Kirby, 1802 LC 3
Megachilidae Osmia aurulenta Panzer, 1799 LC 23
Megachilidae Osmia bicornis Linnaeus, 1758 LC 34
Megachilidae Osmia brevicornis Fabricius, 1798 LC 5
Megachilidae Osmia caerulescens (Linnaeus, 1758) LC 6
Megachilidae Osmia dimidiata Morawitz, 1870 LC 1
Megachilidae Osmia latreillei (Spinola, 1806) LC 10
Megachilidae Osmia leaiana (Kirby, 1802) LC 4
Megachilidae Osmia ligurica Morawitz, 1868 LC 3
Megachilidae Osmia melanogaster Spinola, 1807 LC 24
Megachilidae Osmia minutula (Pérez, 1896) DD 1
Megachilidae Osmia nasoproducta Ferton, 1910 DD 8
Megachilidae Osmia niveata (Fabricius, 1804) LC 47
Megachilidae Osmia rufohirta Latreille, 1811 LC 20
Megachilidae Osmia scutellaris Morawitz, 1868 LC 10
Megachilidae Osmia signata Erichson, 1835 LC 3
Megachilidae Osmia submicans Morawitz, 1870 LC 10
Megachilidae Osmia tricornis Latreille, 1811 LC 56
Megachilidae Osmia versicolor Latreille, 1811 LC 9
Megachilidae Protosmia minutula (Pérez, 1896) DD 3
Megachilidae Rhodanthidium infuscatum (Erichson in Waltl, 1835) DD 5
Megachilidae Rhodanthidium septemdentatum Latreille, 1809 DD 171
Megachilidae Rhodanthidium sticticum (Fabricius, 1787) DD 162
Megachilidae Stelis breviuscula Nylander, 1848 LC 1
Megachilidae Stelis signata (Latreille, 1809) LC 2
Melittidae Dasypoda argentata Panzer, 1809 NT 1
Melittidae Dasypoda hirtipes (Fabricius, 1793) LC 1
Total 2181

Temporal coverage

Data range: 
2003-3-20 - 2023-9-01.
Notes: 

The specimens were captured from 2003 to 2023. Twenty specimens were collected at an unknown date. Most of the specimens were captured in April or May (the time of the year in which bees are the most abundant in this region), totalling 60% of the dated captures (Fig. 2).

Figure 2.  

Within year distribution of bees in the IMBE collection.

Collection data

Collection name: 
IMBE Apoidea collection (Hymenoptera)
Collection identifier: 
IMBE-H
Specimen preservation method: 
Dried and pinned specimens
Curatorial unit: 
IMBE, contact: Gabriel Nève (email: gabriel.neve@imbe.fr)

Usage licence

Usage licence: 
Creative Commons Public Domain Waiver (CC-Zero)
IP rights notes: 

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) 4.0 Licence. All work derived from the present study should cite it appropriately.

Data resources

Data package title: 
IMBE Bee collection (Hymenoptera)
Alternative identifiers: 
Number of data sets: 
1
Data set name: 
IMBE Apoidea collection (Hymenoptera)
Character set: 
IMBE_beeColl_v02.csv
Data format: 
CSV (tab delimited values)
Data format version: 
Darwin core, so that it may be transferred later into GBIF.
Description: 

The dataset includes data on 2181 specimens of Apoidea collected or received by researchers at IMBE, in GBIF compatible format.

Column label Column description
occurrenceID Unique specimen identifier : H (for Hymenoptera) and four digits.
catalogNumber Insitution code (i.e. IMBE) followed by individual occurenceID. Each specimen bears a label with this identifier.
basisOfRecord The specific nature of the data record (i.e. PreservedSpecimen).
eventDate Event date in the format YYYY-MM-DD if the capture date is known to the date or YYYY if only the year is known. If time of capture is known, then format is YYYYMM-DDTHH:MM, with HH:MM the local time.
year Year of capture.
month Month of capture if known,
day Day of capture if known,
verbatimEventDate Date of capture, as mentioned on the label,
scientificName Lowest taxonomic rank possible, usually the species name, sometimes the subspecies, with author and year.
identificationQualifier In case the identification could be given only to a species group, 'cf.' was input.
identificationRemarks Any comment on the identification of the specimen, with list of possible species.
kingdom Kingdom name (i.e. Animalia).
phylum Phylum name (i.e. Arthropoda).
class Class name (i.e. Insecta).
order Order name (i.e. Hymenoptera).
family Family name.
genus Genus name.
specificEpithet Species epithet of the scientificName.
infraspecificEpithet Subspecific epithet, if any is relevant.
scientificNameAuthorship Name of the scientist who described the species and year of description publication.
sex Male (M) or female (F).
caste Queen or worker if known.
taxonRank Taxonomic rank of the most specific name in the scientificName.
identifiedBy Name of the entomologist who identified the specimen.
dateIdentified Year of identification.
identificationVerificationStatus Whether (coded 1) or not (coded 0) the identification is reliable to species level.
previousIdentifications Species name originally given on the specimen label.
country Country of capture.
countryCode Two letter country code of the specimen capture location.
stateProvince French departmental administrative division. In the case of non-French data, any relevant country administrative subdivision.
locality Location of capture, usually the municipality.
verbatimLocality Any geographical indication on the label.
occurrenceRemarks Any ecological data or comment on the label, including method of capture if known.
decimalLatitude Geographic latitude (in decimal degrees) of the capture location.
decimalLongitude Geographic longitude (in decimal degrees) of the capture location.
geodeticDatum System and set of reference points upon which the geographic coordinates are based (i.e. WGS 84)
coordinateUncertaintyInMeters Uncertainty in coordinates, in meters
minimumElevationInMeters Lower limit of the range of altitudes indicated on the label or in the associated reference
maximumElevationInMeters Higher limit of the range of altitude indicated on the label or in the associated reference.
georeferencedBy Identity of the person who added the latitude and longitude data, i.e. either the original recorder or Nève, Gabriel.
georeferenceProtocol How the georeference was computed, i.e. either from georeference web sites or from label data (verbatimLocality).
georeferenceSources Georeference code was inferred from geoportail.gouv.fr, French ING maps or GoogleEarthPro.
georeferencedDate Georeference work was either performed at the time of recording or in 2024.
recordedBy Name of collector (i.e. legit information).
otherCatalogNumbers Any other code the specimen may have, usually according to the study protocol during which it was captured.
institutionCode Institution where the specimen is held (i.e. IMBE, Marseille).
organismQuantity Number of individuals bearing the same label (usually 1).
organismQuantityType Individuals.
language The dataset is mainly written in French, apart from column headings, which are in English.
associatedReferences Any reference citing the relevant specimen.

Additional information

General discussion

At a time of global pollinator decline, this study highlights once again the French Mediterranean Region as one of the main hotspots for wild bee species (Orr et al. 2021, Reverté et al. 2023). The collection holds about a quarter of the 980 species that thrive in mainland France (Ropars et al. in press) and the data provided here will contribute to improve knowledge about French bee species.

The collected specimens listed here, beyond enhancing our understanding of wild bees as previously mentioned, are also used as a reference collection and for the training of entomologists to ensure the accurate identification of future specimens. Moreover, such a collection acts as a 'memory of nature's diversity,' an exceptional resource available to scientists worldwide. Preserving these specimens provides tangible evidence of biodiversity over time, offering a unique opportunity to monitor its evolution in the long term — a critical aspect in the face of the current widespread biodiversity decline and the current major global changes.

One species in the IMBE collection is classified as 'endangered' by the IUCN at the European level (Nieto et al. 2014). This species, Lasioglossum soror, was recorded at nine different localities in the Calanques National Park in 2018. Our data suggest that this species is locally widespread and may have been overlooked in other studies as all but two of the 19 specimens in the IMBE collection were collected in coloured pan traps.

Six species in the IMBE collection are classified as “Near Threatened” by the IUCN at the European level (Nieto et al. 2014): Andrena ovatula, Colletes albomaculatus, Lasioglossum prasinum, Lasioglossum pygmaeum, Lasioglossum sexnotatum and Dasypoda argentata. In addition, D. argentata is also generally recognised as a rare species. The identification of these species is crucial for conservation efforts, as it guides habitat management and protection initiatives. Understanding the status of near-threatened species helps preserve biodiversity and maintain essential ecosystem services provided by pollinators, while raising public awareness and support for bee conservation initiatives. Finally, a total of 68 species recorded in the IMBE collection are currently classified as 'Data Deficient'. This status underscores significant gaps in our understanding of these species' biology, distribution and conservation needs. It highlights the critical importance of maintaining and enhancing monitoring efforts to gather the data necessary for informed conservation decisions. Ensuring the availability of updated and comprehensive information on these species is essential to address potential threats and support their long-term survival.

This study is part of current national effort to document the distribution of pollinators in France. Many initiatives, for example, French National Pollinator Plan, Regional Initiatives ("Plan Régional d'Action") and the French Checklist (Ropars et al. in press) are currently assessing the status of wild bees species in France and this topical issue is part of the research programme. By contributing valuable data to the forthcoming French Red List of bees, we aim to foster a greater awareness of the ecological significance of these species. As the IMBE continues its dedicated research, we anticipate that future studies will further enrich our knowledge and help shape effective conservation strategies, ensuring that these vital pollinators thrive for generations to come.

Abbreviation used throughout

IMBE: Institut Méditerranen de Biodiversité et d’Ecologie marine et continentale (Marseille, France)

Acknowledgements

Erwin Scheuchl, Benoît Martha, Emile Gigandet, Gilles Mahé, Yvan Brugerolles, Gérard Le Goff and Nicolas J. Vereecken identified some of the specimens. Jean-Yves Meunier set up the boxes and the label layout and started the data input of the collection. Robert Mesibov gave us valuable advice on the GBIF format.

This scientific work is part of the natural heritage inventory (inpn.mnhn.fr). In 2023, it received support from PatriNat (OFB-CNRS-MNHN).

Author contributions

Study design: GN and BG, data input: LS and CL, capture of specimens and labelling: CCJ, LR, LS, FF, MZ, BG, identification of specimens: MA, CB, ED, BG and VL; data analysis and formatting: GN, writing up: CL, LS, BG, CCJ, LS, MZ and GN, supervision: GN, collection management: GN. All authors commented and agreed on the final manuscript. The first two authors contributed equally to this work.

References

Supplementary material

Suppl. material 1: Numbers of specimens per French Department 
Authors:  Gabriel Nève
Data type:  geographic coverage of bee data in France
Brief description: 

Numbers of bee specimens per French Department in the IMBE collection (Marseille, France). Encoding is UTF-8.

Two specimens from Italy (Sardinia) and one from Spain (Catalonia) are exluded.

login to comment