Biodiversity Data Journal : Taxonomy & Inventories
PDF
Taxonomy & Inventories
Jumping plant lice (Hemiptera, Psylloidea) of Bulgaria – an annotated checklist
expand article infoMonika Pramatarova‡,§, Igor Malenovský|,, Ilia Gjonov
‡ Sofia University, Faculty of Biology, Sofia, Bulgaria
§ National Museum of Natural History - Bulgarian Academy of Sciences, Sofia, Bulgaria
| Department of Botany and Zoology, Faculty of Science, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic
¶ Department of Entomology, Moravian Museum, Brno, Czech Republic
Open Access

Abstract

Background

Knowledge of the fauna of jumping plant lice or psyllids in Bulgaria is rather scattered. So far, 113 species of psyllids have been recorded from Bulgaria in 51 publications. The aim of this study is to provide an up-to-date checklist of the Psylloidea species from Bulgaria, based on extensive fieldwork by the authors and examination of specimens mainly from the Zoological Collection of Sofia University (BFUS) and the Moravian Museum in Brno (MMBC). In addition, a thorough review of all relevant literature was undertaken to consolidate the existing records.

New information

Twenty-five species of jumping plant lice are recorded here from Bulgaria for the first time. Of these, two species represent new records for Europe: Dyspersa kantshavelii (Gegechkori, 1977) and Heterotrioza kochiae (Gegechkori, 1975); and three additional species represent new records for the Balkan Peninsula: Arytainilla spartiicola (Šulc, 1912), Craspedolepta araneosa Loginova, 1962 and Eryngiofaga babugani (Loginova, 1964). A new synonymy is proposed: Colposcenia osmanica Vondráček, 1953 = Colposcenia kiritshenkoi Loginova, 1960, syn. nov. A lectotype is designated for C. osmanica to stabilise the nomenclature. Original drawings or photographs of diagnostic characters on male and female terminalia are provided for C. osmanica, D. kantshavelii, Heterotrioza eurotiae (Loginova, 1960) and H. kochiae. Distributional maps summarising all known records from Bulgaria are provided for each species. Where available, photographs of live or mounted specimens and information on host plants are also provided, including new host plant records for 10 species. The previously published records of Aphalara sauteri Burckhardt, 1983, Bactericera acutipennis (Zetterstedt, 1828), B. reuteri (Šulc, 1913), Dyspersa apicalis (Foerster, 1848), D. viridula (Zetterstedt, 1828), Eryngiofaga mesomela (Flor, 1861) and Trioza dispar Löw, 1878 from Bulgaria are considered doubtful and these species are deleted from the list of the Bulgarian fauna, which now comprises 130 species from 33 genera and six families of jumping plant lice. This diversity is compared with the known data on Psylloidea in other countries of the Balkan Peninsula and Turkey and the Bulgarian psyllid fauna is discussed from the perspective of biogeography.

Keywords

Balkan Peninsula, biodiversity, Europe, faunistics, new records, new synonymy, new host plant records, phytophagous insects, psyllids, Sternorrhyncha, taxonomy, West Palaearctic

Introduction

Jumping plant lice or psyllids (Hemiptera, Psylloidea) are small plant sap-feeding insects. They are usually narrowly host-specific and some species are of increasing economic importance as vectors of bacterial plant pathogens such as Candidatus Phytoplasma and Liberibacter spp. (Burckhardt et al. 2021, Moreno et al. 2021, Mauck et al. 2024). The superfamily Psylloidea comprises about 4,000 species worldwide, of which about 400 species occur in Europe (Ouvrard 2020). Although it is generally acknowledged that the Palaearctic fauna of the Psylloidea is comparatively well known, knowledge of the psyllids of the Balkans is still incomplete. For some countries, for example, Albania, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Kosovo, Montenegro and North Macedonia, information is scarce, scattered or even missing (Ouvrard 2020).

Bulgaria is a medium-sized country (app. 110,000 km2) located in the south-eastern part of the European continent and in the central and eastern part of the Balkan Peninsula. The country borders Romania to the north, Serbia and North Macedonia to the west, Greece and Turkey to the south and the Black Sea to the east. A significant part of the Bulgarian territory belongs to the Alpine-Himalayan Belt, which is characterised by the typical alternation of chain-like mountain ranges with old, highly fractured mountain massifs. The diverse relief is complemented by the flat Danubian Plain, which is connected to the vast Eastern European Plain. In terms of hydroclimate, the country occupies a transitional position between the southern parts of the temperate and subtropical climate, with the southern regions being influenced by the Mediterranean. Together with the physical-geographical position of Bulgaria, the combination of diverse relief, climate and water regime determines the high biological diversity of the country (Hubenov 1997, Kopralev et al. 2002).

The first data on the Bulgarian psyllids were published by Dimitar Joakimov as part of a pioneering list of the Hemiptera fauna of Bulgaria (Joakimov 1909), which included records of 17 species of psyllids. Although some of the psyllids collected by Joakimov have recently been found in the collections of the National Museum of Natural History in Sofia, the voucher specimens for the records published in Joakimov (1909) have probably been lost and cannot be revised (Pramatarova et al. 2023).

Thereafter, the psyllids were neglected by Bulgarian entomologists for a long time, until in the 1960s when Konov (1961), Tsalev (1961), Harizanov (1963), Harizanov (1964), Harizanov (1966a), Harizanov (1966b), Harizanov (1966c), Harizanov (1966d), Harizanov (1966e), Harizanov (1970) dealt with the biology and ecology of several economically important species: Cacopsylla pyri (Linnaeus, 1758), C. pyrisuga (Foerster, 1848), C. picta (Foerster, 1848), C. pruni (Scopoli, 1763), Homotoma ficus (Linnaeus, 1758) and Bactericera nigricornis (Foerster, 1848).

At the same time, the Polish expert on Psylloidea, Sędzimir Maciej Klimaszewski, reported in a series of faunistic and taxonomic papers (Klimaszewski 1961a, Klimaszewski 1961b, Klimaszewski 1963, Klimaszewski 1964, Klimaszewski 1965, Klimaszewski 1970), which are summarised in the checklist of psyllids of the Palaearctic Region (Klimaszewski 1973), a total of 41 species from Bulgaria, including formal descriptions of four new species, two of which are still valid – Craspedolepta bulgarica Klimaszewski, 1961 and Colposcenia traciana (Klimaszewski, 1970). Craspedolepta salicorniae Klimaszewski, 1961 was synonymised with Rhodochlanis bicolor (Scott, 1880) and Homotoma viridis Klimaszewski, 1961 was synonymised with H. ficus (Linnaeus, 1758) by Burckhardt (1989).

Another important contribution was made by the Czech hemipterologist, Pavel Lauterer. Mainly on the basis of material he had collected during several field trips to Bulgaria in the 1970–1980s and, in collaboration with other colleagues, he presented 14 species from Bulgaria, including Agonoscena pistaciae Burckhardt & Lauterer, 1989 and Megagonoscena gallicola Burckhardt & Lauterer, 1989, which were described as new to science (Harizanov and Lauterer 1968, Lauterer 1979, Lauterer 1982, Burckhardt and Lauterer 1989, Lauterer and Janíček 1990, Lauterer 1991, Lauterer 1993, Burckhardt and Lauterer 1997a, Lauterer and Malenovský 2002). In addition, Loginova (1978) described Diaphorina lycii Loginova, 1978, partly on the basis of material collected by P. Lauterer in Bulgaria. However, a larger part of P. Lauterer’s material from Bulgaria has remained unpublished to this day.

In the 1980s, Elżbieta Głowacka, another Polish entomologist, visited Bulgaria several times and published comprehensive lists of psyllids collected in the Western Rhodopes and the Pirin Mountains, which represented another major step in the knowledge of the Bulgarian fauna, as 26 species were recorded from the country for the first time (Głowacka and Harizanov 1983, Głowacka 1989).

Further faunistic data on psyllids from Bulgaria were scattered in the publications of Schaefer (1949), Vondráček (1953), Loginova (1974a), Gegechkori and Loginova (1990), Maryańska-Nadachowska et al. (1992), Kuznetsova et al. (1995), Burckhardt and Lauterer (1997b), Hodkinson and Bird (2000), Maryańska-Nadachowska (2002), Labina (2007), Labina et al. (2009), Labina et al. (2014), Vétek and Rédei (2009), Etropolska et al. (2011), Etropolska et al. (2015), Wonglersak et al. (2017), Nakabachi et al. (2020), Percy and Cronk (2020), Shapoval et al. (2021) and Nokkala et al. (2022).

Recently, Pramatarova et al. (2021) provided a list of psyllid species collected in the Sarnena Sredna Gora Mountains, Pramatarova et al. (2023) revised the historical material of the Psylloidea in the National Museum of Natural History in Sofia and Pramatarova et al. (2024) published DNA barcodes for 24 species of Aphalaridae from Bulgaria, four of which were recorded for the first time from the country.

Here, we summarise and critically re-evaluate all previously published data on psyllids from Bulgaria. We add many new data, based on a complete revision of the material of psyllids collected by Pavel Lauterer in the 1970–1980s and our own extensive fieldwork in Bulgaria in recent years. The main aim of this work is to provide an up-to-date checklist of the Psylloidea for Bulgaria. We also provide maps summarising the distribution of individual psyllid species in Bulgaria. Where available or relevant, we provide habitus photographs, illustrations of diagnostic characters and information on the nomenclature and host plants of the psyllids.

Materials and methods

A large part of the specimens included in this paper were collected by us during faunistic surveys in different regions of Bulgaria in the years 1997–2023 by sweeping or direct search on host plants. This material is mainly deposited in the Zoological Collection of Sofia University in Sofia, Bulgaria (BFUS) and partly in the Moravian Museum in Brno, Czechia (MMBC). We have also reviewed and identified all specimens collected by Pavel Lauterer and his colleagues and students (R. Janíček, A. Merta and others) in Bulgaria in the 1970–1980s – this material is deposited in the MMBC. A small number of specimens of psyllids from Bulgaria deposited in the National Museum in Prague, Czechia (NMPC), have also been added to the dataset. In total, 10838 specimens of psyllids were directly examined by us. In view of the considerable size of the dataset, detailed information on the material examined is not given in the main text of the paper, but can be found together with previously published records of psyllids from Bulgaria in a GBIF dataset published in parallel (Pramatarova et al. 2025). The material from BFUS has also been included in an internal database prepared on the Specify collection management platform (Specify Collections Consortium 2021).

In order to give a concise overview of the distribution of the species in the main text, we give a list of the geomorphological units where the species have been recorded, based on the classification of Hubenov (1997), which is widely used in literature on the fauna of Bulgaria. For each species, we also provide a distribution map with these units (Fig. 1). In the absence of precise GPS coordinates for a record, estimated coordinates were used for georeferencing. If a locality was only given as a town or village, the centre was taken as the reference point. When additional information was provided (e.g. elevation, slope orientation etc.), these details were included in the process and points that corresponded to this information were selected. Published records that did not contain sufficient information, such as specimen deposition details or those that referred to species whose original identification we considered uncertain in light of current taxonomy, were classified in our distribution maps as 'published, requiring revision', meaning that these data require further verification or revision. The maps were created using QGIS 3.26.3 software (http://www.qgis.org).

Figure 1.  

Map of the geographical regions of Bulgaria (Hubenov 1997). 1 - Bulgarian state border; 2 - border of regions; 3 - Black Sea border; 4 - border of subregions; 5 - border of smaller territorial units; 6 - border of mountains or basins. Abbreviations: Danubian Plain (D): Western Danubian Plain (DW), Middle Danubian Plain (DM), Eastern Danubian Plain (DE) - Ludogorie-Dobrudzha District (DEL), Popovo-Provadiya District (DEP); Stara Planina Range system (S): Predbalkan (SP) - Western Predbalkan (SPW), Middle Predbalkan (SPM), Eastern Predbalkan (SPE), Balkan (SB) - Western Balkan (SBW), Middle Balkan (SBM), Eastern Balkan (SBE); Transitional region (P): Kraishte-Konyavo District (PK) - Rouy Mt. (PKR), Golo Burdo Mt. Verila (PKG), Verila Mt. (PKV), Kraishte (PKK), Zemenska Planina Mt. (PKZ), Konyavska Planina Mt. (PKQ), Vitosha District (PV) - Sofia Basin (PVS), Lyulin Mt. (PVL), Vitosha Mt. (PVV), Plana Mt. (PVP), Srednogorie-Podbalkan subregion (PS) - Podbalkan Basins (PSP), Sredna Gora Mts. (PSS), lhtimanska Sredna Gora (PSI), Lozenska Planina (PSL), Sushtinska Sredna Gora (PSC), Surnena Sredna Gora (PSA), Thracian Lowland (PT), Toundzha-Strandzha subregion (PB) - Sakar-Toundzha District (PBT), Sakar Mt. (PBC), Bakadzhik-Bourgas District (PBB), Strandzha-Dervent District (PBD), Strandzha Mt. (PBS); Rila-Rhodopi Massif (R): Osogovo-Belasitsa group (RO) - Osogovska Planina Mt. (ROO), Vlahina Planina Mt. (ROV), Maleshevska Planina Mt. (ROM), Ograzhden Mt. (ROG), Belasitsa Mt. (ROB), Srednostrumska Valley (ROS), Boboshevo-Simitli Valley (ROT), Krupnik-Sandanski-Petrich Valley (ROP), Rila-Pirin group (RP) - Rila Mt. (RPR), Pirin Mt. (RPP), Slavianka Mt. (RPS), Sturgach Mt. (RPT), Mesta Valley (RPM), Rhodopi Mts (RR) - Western Rhodopi Mts (RPW), Eastern Rhodopi Mts (RPE); Black Sea coast (B): Northern Black Sea coast (BN), Southern Black Sea coast (BS).

The psyllid taxa are listed in alphabetical order according to the classification proposed by Burckhardt et al. (2021), the nomenclature following Ouvrard (2020) and Cho et al. (2022). For each species, a reference is given to its morphological diagnosis and illustrations in literature that can be used for identification. Unless otherwise stated, the general distribution is summarised from Ouvrard (2020). The distribution in Bulgaria is listed separately for published records and newly-studied material using the abbreviations of the districts from Hubenov (1997) (see the legend to Fig. 1 for the list of abbreviations). We explicitly list host plants only if they are associated with data from Bulgaria (for more details on host plants throughout the species' range, see Ouvrard (2020)). We use the term 'host plant' or 'confirmed host plant' only for plant taxa where a psyllid species is known to complete its life cycle from immature to adult (Burckhardt et al. 2014). In cases where only adults were collected, but no immatures, on a plant taxon that we nevertheless believe to be a potential host plant, we use the term 'probable host plant'. The nomenclature of the host plants is taken from POWO (2024). The morphological terminology in the taxonomic notes follows Ossiannilsson (1992). Photographs of live specimens of psyllids were taken with a Canon 70D DSLR camera with a Canon MP-E 65 mm macro lens and a Yongnuo YN-24EX macro flash or with a Nikon 5200 DSLR camera with a Laowa ultra macro lens and a Laowa Twin Flash KX-800. Most photographs of dry-mounted specimens were taken with a Keyence VHX-5000 digital microscope with VH-Z20T objective. Line drawings were made of slide-mounted specimens under a Leica DM5500B compound microscope with drawing tube. The latter instrument with Leica DFC320 camera and Leica Application Suite software was also used for detailed images of terminalia, temporarily slide-mounted in glycerol.

Annotated checklist of Psylloidea in Bulgaria

Family Aphalaridae Löw, 1879

Subfamily Aphalarinae Löw, 1879

Genus Aphalara Foerster, 1848

Aphalara affinis (Zetterstedt, 1828)

Diagnosis: 

Adult (Fig. 2a). Loginova (1961), Ossiannilsson (1992). Fifth instar immature. Ossiannilsson (1992).

Figure 2.

Aphalara affinis (Zetterstedt, 1828).

aAphalara affinis, adult male;  
bDistribution of Aphalara affinis in Bulgaria.  
Distribution: 

General distribution. Northern, Central and Eastern Europe, Russia (European part, Siberia and Far East). Distribution in Bulgaria (Fig. 2b). Published records: RRW (Pramatarova et al. 2024). Material examined: RRW.

Aphalara avicularis Ossiannilsson in Ossiannilsson & Jansson, 1981

Diagnosis: 

Adult (Fig. 3a) and fifth-instar immature. Ossiannilsson (1992).

Figure 3.

Aphalara avicularis Ossiannilsson in Ossiannilsson & Jansson, 1981

aAphalara avicularis, adult male;  
bDistribution of Aphalara avicularis in Bulgaria.  
Feeds on: 

In Bulgaria, adults were collected on Polygonum aviculare L. (Głowacka 1989, Pramatarova et al. 2024), which is a confirmed host plant (Ossiannilsson 1992).

Distribution: 

General distribution. Europe (except Mediterranean), South Korea, Russian Far East (Cho et al. 2020). Distribution in Bulgaria (Fig. 3b). Published records: ROP, SBW (Głowacka 1989, Pramatarova et al. 2024). Material examined: BN, PSL, ROP, SBW.

Aphalara borealis Heslop-Harrison, 1949

Diagnosis: 

Adult and fifth-instar immature. Ossiannilsson (1992).

Distribution: 

General distribution. Northern, Central and Eastern Europe, Great Britain, Kazakhstan, Mongolia, Russia (European part, Siberia and Far East). Distribution in Bulgaria (Fig. 4). Material examined: RPP, SBW.

Figure 4.  

Distribution of Aphalara borealis Heslop-Harrison, 1949 in Bulgaria.

Notes: 

New record for Bulgaria.

Aphalara exilis (Weber & Mohr, 1804)

Diagnosis: 

Adult and fifth-instar immature. Ossiannilsson (1992), Burckhardt and Lauterer (1997a).

Distribution: 

General distribution. Western Palaearctic (Burckhardt and Lauterer 1997a). Distribution in Bulgaria (Fig. 5). Published records: PVS, RRW (Joakimov 1909, Klimaszewski 1965, Głowacka and Harizanov 1983). Material examined: PVL, RPM.

Figure 5.  

Distribution of Aphalara exilis (Weber & Mohr, 1804) in Bulgaria.

Notes: 

The species is quite rare in Bulgaria and only a few specimens have been collected recently. It is very likely that the previously published records from Bulgaria refer in fact to A. nigrimaculosa (Pramatarova et al. 2023).

Aphalara freji Burckhardt & Lauterer, 1997

Diagnosis: 

Adult. Burckhardt and Lauterer (1997a); Ossiannilsson (1992) as A. polygoni. Fifth-instar immature. Ossiannilsson (1992), as A. polygoni.

Distribution: 

General distribution. Western Palaearctic, Iran, South Korea. Distribution in Bulgaria (Fig. 6). Published records: ROP, RRW (Klimaszewski 1965, Głowacka and Harizanov 1983, Głowacka 1989; as A. polygoni); PSA, SBE (Pramatarova et al. 2021, Pramatarova et al. 2024). Material examined: PSA, ROM, ROP, RPM, RPP, RPR, SBE.

Figure 6.  

Distribution of Aphalara freji Burckhardt & Lauterer, 1997 in Bulgaria.

Notes: 

Before the revision by Burckhardt and Lauterer (1997a), A. freji was usually misinterpreted as A. polygoni auct. nec Foerster, 1848. Therefore, we assign here the data from Bulgaria published by Klimaszewski (1965), Głowacka and Harizanov (1983) and Głowacka (1989) as 'A. polygoni' to A. freji. This is partly supported by the fact that the specimens of Głowacka and Harizanov (1983) and Głowacka (1989) were collected on Polygonum sp., while the host plants of A. polygoni Foerster, 1848 are Rumex spp. (Burckhardt and Lauterer 1997a).

Aphalara maculipennis Löw, 1886

Diagnosis: 

Adult (Fig. 7a) and fifth-instar immature. Ossiannilsson (1992).

Figure 7.

Aphalara maculipennis Löw, 1886.

aAphalara maculipennis, adult male (dead specimen);  
bDistribution of Aphalara maculipennis in Bulgaria.  
Distribution: 

General distribution. Palaearctic. Distribution in Bulgaria (Fig. 7b). Published records: without locality data (Pramatarova et al. 2023); SBW (Pramatarova et al. 2024). Material examined: SBW.

Aphalara nigrimaculosa Gegechkori, 1981

Diagnosis: 

Adult (Fig. 8a). Gegechkori (1981), Burckhardt and Lauterer (1997a). Fifth instar immature (Fig. 8b).

Figure 8.

Aphalara nigrimaculosa Gegechkori, 1981.

aAphalara nigrimaculosa, adult female;  
bAphalara nigrimaculosa, immature on Rumex acetosella 
cDistribution of Aphalara nigrimaculosa in Bulgaria.  
Feeds on: 

So far, the only known host plant of Aphalara nigrimaculosa was Rumex alpinus L. (Gegechkori 1981, Burckhardt and Lauterer 1997a). In Bulgaria, we collected adults and immatures on Rumex acetosella L., which represents a new host plant record for the species.

Distribution: 

General distribution. Bulgaria, Greece, Caucasus (Burckhardt and Lauterer 1997a). Distribution in Bulgaria (Fig. 8c). Published records: RPP (Głowacka 1989, as A. sauteri); RRW (Harizanov and Lauterer 1968, as Aphalara exilis; Pramatarova et al. 2024); without locality data (Burckhardt and Lauterer 1997a, Pramatarova et al. 2023). Material examined: RPP, RPR, RRW, SBM.

Notes: 

The records of Aphalara sauteri Burckhardt, 1983 from the Pirin Mts. published by Głowacka (1989) are assigned here to A. nigrimaculosa. This is based on other specimens from the same area from MMBC and BFUS, which were examined by us and all belong to A. nigrimaculosa. See also the comment under A. sauteri in the section 'Doubtful records' below.

Aphalara polygoni Foerster, 1848

Diagnosis: 

Adult and fifth-instar immature. Ossiannilsson (1992), as A. rumicicola. According to Burckhardt and Lauterer (1997a), A. rumicicola Klimaszewski, 1966 is a junior synonym of A. polygoni.

Feeds on: 

Rumex sp. according to Głowacka and Harizanov (1983) and Głowacka (1989). The confirmed host plants are Rumex acetosa L., R. acetosella L. and R. scutatus L. (Ossiannilsson 1992, Burckhardt and Lauterer 1997a).

Distribution: 

General distribution. Northern, Central and Eastern Europe (Burckhardt and Lauterer 1997a). Distribution in Bulgaria (Fig. 9). Published records: RRW, ROP (Głowacka and Harizanov 1983, Głowacka 1989, as A. rumicicola); without locality data (Pramatarova et al. 2023); RRW (Pramatarova et al. 2024). Material examined: PKZ, PSL, RPM, RPP, RPR, RRW.

Figure 9.  

Distribution of Aphalara polygoni Foerster, 1848 in Bulgaria.

Genus Colposcenia Enderlein, 1929

Colposcenia aliena (Löw, 1881)

Diagnosis: 

Adult (Fig. 10a). Loginova (1960); Tamanini (1977), as C. italica. Fifth instar immature (Fig. 10b).

Figure 10.

Colposcenia aliena (Löw, 1881).

aColposcenia aliena, adult male;  
bColposcenia aliena, immature;  
cDistribution of Colposcenia aliena in Bulgaria.  
Feeds on: 

Oligophagous on Tamarix spp. (Burckhardt 1989, Spodek et al. 2017). In Bulgaria, we collected adults and immatures on Tamarix ramosissima Ledeb., which is thus one of the confirmed host plants.

Distribution: 

General distribution. Southern Europe, North Africa, Ethiopia, Middle East, Caucasus, Central Asia, China. Distribution in Bulgaria (Fig. 10c). Published records: DEP (Pramatarova et al. 2024). Material examined: DEP.

Colposcenia bidentata Burckhardt, 1988

Diagnosis: 

Adult (Fig. 11a). Burckhardt (1988).

Figure 11.

Colposcenia bidentata Burckhardt, 1988.

aColposcenia bidentata, adult, female;  
bDistribution of Colposcenia bidentata in Bulgaria.  
Feeds on: 

The genus Tamarix was indicated as the host plant of Colposcenia bidentata (Burckhardt 1988). In Bulgaria, we collected adults on Tamarix ramosissima Ledeb., a probable host plant species. It is possible that C. bidentata also develops on T. tetrandra Pall. ex. M.B., as mixed communities of both Tamarix species occur in Bulgaria.

Distribution: 

General distribution. Bulgaria and Turkey. Distribution in Bulgaria (Fig. 11b). Published records: RRE (Pramatarova et al. 2024). Material examined: ROM, ROP, RRE.

Colposcenia osmanica Vondráček, 1953

Nomenclature: 

Colposcenia kiritshenkoi Loginova, 1960: 57, syn. nov.

Diagnosis: 

Adult (Fig. 12a, b, c). Vondráček (1953), Loginova (1974b); Loginova (1960), Loginova (1974b), as C. kiritshenkoi. Based on numerous specimens collected at different times at several places in Bulgaria, we conclude here that C. osmanica and C. kiritshenkoi are seasonal forms of one and the same species, differing only in their colouration (C. osmanica - summer form, C. kiritshenkoi - overwintering form). Both colour forms were collected by us in Bulgaria (Fig. 12a, b). The male and female terminalia of specimens from Bulgaria are illustrated in Fig. 12c. Further details on the proposed synonymy can be found in the 'Discussion' section below.

Figure 12.

Colposcenia osmanica Vondráček, 1953.

aColposcenia osmanica, adult female, summer specimen;  
bColposcenia osmanica, adult male, overwintering specimen;  
cColposcenia osmanica, male and female terminalia. a – male terminalia, lateral view; b – paramere, inner surface, lateral view; c – paramere, posterior view; d – distal segment of aedeagus, lateral view; e – distal segment of aedeagus, dorsal view; f – paramere, dorsal view; g – female terminalia, lateral view; h – female proctiger, dorsal view; i – female subgenital plate, ventral view. Scale bars: 0.1 mm;  
dDistribution of Colposcenia osmanica in Bulgaria.  
Feeds on: 

Colposcenia osmanica (as C. kiritshenkoi) has been recorded from Tamarix negevensis Zohary, T. parviflora DC., T. ramosissima Ledeb., T. senegalensis DC. and T. smyrnensis Bunge (Gegechkori and Loginova 1990, Spodek et al. 2017). In Bulgaria, we collected adults on T. ramosissima and perhaps also T. tetrandra Pall. ex. M.B., which often grows together with the first species in mixed stands.

Distribution: 

General distribution. South-eastern Europe (Bulgaria, Ukraine, southern Russia), Middle East, Caucasus, Central Asia. Distribution in Bulgaria (Fig. 12d). Published records: ROP (Klimaszewski 1963, Klimaszewski 1965, Głowacka 1989), Bulgaria, without locality data (Gegechkori and Loginova 1990; as C. kiritshenkoi, Maryańska-Nadachowska (2002)); ROV (Pramatarova et al. 2024). Material examined: BN, BS, DW, PBT, ROM, ROP, ROV, RPP, RRE, SPE.

Colposcenia traciana (Klimaszewski, 1970)

Diagnosis: 

Adult (Fig. 13a). Klimaszewski (1970), as Stigmaphalara tamaricis traciana; Loginova (1974b).

Figure 13.

Colposcenia traciana (Klimaszewski, 1970).

aColposcenia traciana, adult male;  
bDistribution of Colposcenia traciana in Bulgaria.  
Feeds on: 

As with all other Colposcenia species, the host plants of C. traciana belong to the plant genus Tamarix (Klimaszewski 1970). Seljak (2020) found it on Tamarix gallica L. in Slovenia. In Bulgaria, we collected adults on Tamarix ramosissima Ledeb., which is another probable host species.

Distribution: 

General distribution. Slovenia (Seljak 2020), Bulgaria, Greece. Distribution in Bulgaria (Fig. 13b). Published records: BS (Klimaszewski 1965, as Stigmaphalara tamaricis), BS, PBS (Klimaszewski 1970, Pramatarova et al. 2024). Material examined: BS, ROP.

Notes: 

The type locality of C. traciana is in Bulgaria: Primorsko (Klimaszewski 1970).

Genus Craspedolepta Enderlein, 1921

Craspedolepta araneosa Loginova, 1962

Diagnosis: 

Adult (Fig. 14a). Loginova (1962), Loginova (1963a), Loginova (1964). The Bulgarian specimens agree well with the original description (Loginova 1962) as regards the presence of long setae on the body (especially on the dorsal surface of the head and thorax), the pattern of the forewings and the details of the male paramere and the female terminalia. They differ in the denser and larger surface spinules on the forewing membrane, which are more similar to the condition in C. artemisiae than the illustration in the original description. More material is needed to assess the taxonomic significance of this character.

Figure 14.

Craspedolepta araneosa Loginova, 1962.

aCraspedolepta araneosa, adult male and female;  
bDistribution of Craspedolepta araneosa in Bulgaria.  
Feeds on: 

In Bulgaria, we collected adults on Artemisia pedemontana Balb., which represents a new probable host plant for the species. In Russia and Central Asia, C. araneosa was collected on Artemisia austriaca Jacq., A. lercheana Weber ex Stechm., A. nitrosa Weber ex Stechm., A. schrenkiana Ledeb. and A. sublessingiana (B. Keler) Krasch. ex Poljakov (Loginova 1962).

Distribution: 

General distribution. Russia (south-east of the European part: Orenburg Region), Central Asia (Kazakhstan, Uzbekistan, Tajikistan) (Loginova 1962, Gegechkori and Loginova 1990). Distribution in Bulgaria (Fig. 14b). Material examined: BN.

Notes: 

New record for Bulgaria and the Balkan Peninsula.

Craspedolepta artemisiae (Foerster, 1848)

Diagnosis: 

Adult. Loginova (1963a), Klimaszewski (1975).

Distribution: 

General distribution. Central, South and Eastern Europe, Russia (European part, Siberia and Far East), Kazakhstan (Gegechkori and Loginova 1990). Distribution in Bulgaria (Fig. 15). Published records: RRW (Lauterer and Malenovský 2002). Material examined: RRW.

Figure 15.  

Distribution of Craspedolepta artemisiae (Foerster, 1848) in Bulgaria.

Craspedolepta bulgarica Klimaszewski, 1961

Diagnosis: 

Adult (Fig. 16a). Klimaszewski (1961a), Loginova (1963a), Klimaszewski (1975).

Figure 16.

Craspedolepta bulgarica Klimaszewski, 1961.

aCraspedolepta bulgarica, adult female;  
bDistribution of Craspedolepta bulgarica in Bulgaria.  
Feeds on: 

Collected on Achillea sp. in Bulgaria (Głowacka and Harizanov 1983, Pramatarova et al. 2024). Several Achillea spp. have been reported as confirmed or probable host plans in other countries (Burckhardt and Lauterer 1993, Conci et al. 1993, Lauterer 1993, AI-Khawaldeh et al. 1997, Seljak et al. 2008).

Distribution: 

General distribution. Central, South and Eastern Europe, Caucasus, Middle East and Central Asia (Gegechkori and Loginova 1990). Distribution in Bulgaria (Fig. 16b). Published records: PVS, RRW, SBW (Klimaszewski 1961a, Głowacka and Harizanov 1983, Pramatarova et al. 2024). Material examined: DEP, PKZ, PVS, ROM, ROP, RPP, RRE, RRW, SBW, SPW.

Notes: 

The type locality of C. bulgarica is Smoljan in the Rhodopi Mts. (Klimaszewski 1961a).

Craspedolepta conspersa (Löw, 1888)

Diagnosis: 

Adult. Klimaszewski (1961a), Loginova (1963a), Loginova (1966), Conci and Tamanini (1983).

Distribution: 

General distribution. Central, South and Eastern Europe (Conci and Tamanini 1983, Cho et al. 2017a). Distribution in Bulgaria (Fig. 17). Published records: Bulgaria, without locality data (Klimaszewski 1973), RRW (Głowacka and Harizanov 1983). Material examined: PSI.

Figure 17.  

Distribution of Craspedolepta conspersa (Löw, 1888) in Bulgaria.

Notes: 

In his checklist of Palaearctic psyllids, Klimaszewski (1973) listed C. conspersa from Bulgaria, referring to his earlier work (Klimaszewski 1961a).⁠ However, this was probably a mistake, as Klimaszewski (1961a) studied specimens of C. conspersa only from Hungary. The species was again reported from Bulgaria by Głowacka and Harizanov (1983) and its occurrence in the country was also confirmed on the basis of our samples.

Craspedolepta innoxia (Foerster, 1848)

Diagnosis: 

Adult (Fig. 18a). Vondráček (1957a), Loginova (1963a).

Figure 18.

Craspedolepta innoxia (Foerster, 1848).

aCraspedolepta innoxia, adult male;  
bDistribution of Craspedolepta innoxia in Bulgaria.  
Feeds on: 

Collected on Daucus carota L. (Głowacka and Harizanov 1983), which is known as a host plant (Lauterer 1965).

Distribution: 

General distribution. Central, South and Eastern Europe, North Africa, Caucasus, Middle East, Central Asia (Gegechkori and Loginova 1990). Distribution in Bulgaria (Fig. 18b). Published records: ROM, RRW, SBW (Głowacka and Harizanov 1983, Lauterer 1991, Pramatarova et al. 2024). Material examined: PBB, PT, ROM, ROP, RRE, SBW, SPW.

Craspedolepta latior Wagner, 1944

Diagnosis: 

Adult. Loginova (1963a), Klimaszewski (1975), Ossiannilsson (1992), Burckhardt and Lauterer (2009). Fifth-instar immature. Ossiannilsson (1992).

Feeds on: 

Collected on Artemisia sp. in Bulgaria (Głowacka and Harizanov 1983). Monophagous on Artemisia vulgaris L. in Europe (Ossiannilsson 1992, Burckhardt and Lauterer 2009).

Distribution: 

General distribution. Central, Northern and Eastern Europe, Russia (European part, Siberia and Far East), Central Asia, Mongolia, Japan (Gegechkori and Loginova 1990). Distribution in Bulgaria (Fig. 19). Published records: RRW (Głowacka and Harizanov 1983).

Figure 19.  

Distribution of Craspedolepta latior Wagner, 1944 in Bulgaria.

Notes: 

The only record of C. latior from Bulgaria as published by Głowacka and Harizanov (1983) from the Western Rhodope Mts. requires a revision, as Craspedolepta spp. associated with Artemisia spp. have often been misidentified in the past. We have not been able to confirm the occurrence of C. latior in the country from our own collections or from P. Lauterer's material in MMBC.

Craspedolepta malachitica (Dahlbom, 1851)

Diagnosis: 

Adult (Fig. 20a). Loginova (1963a), Klimaszewski (1975), Ossiannilsson (1992), Burckhardt and Lauterer (2009). Fifth-instar immature. Ossiannilsson (1992).

Figure 20.

Craspedolepta malachitica (Dahlbom, 1851).

aCraspedolepta malachitica, adult;  
bDistribution of Craspedolepta malachitica in Bulgaria.  
Feeds on: 

In Bulgaria, adults were collected on Artemisia absinthium L. (Maryańska-Nadachowska et al. 1992, Pramatarova et al. 2024), a confirmed host plant (Ossiannilsson 1992, Burckhardt and Lauterer 2009).

Distribution: 

General distribution. Europe, Turkey, Caucasus, Central Asia, Russia (European part, Siberia, Far East), Mongolia. Distribution in Bulgaria (Fig. 20b). Published records: PKQ, PVS (Maryańska-Nadachowska et al. 1992, Pramatarova et al. 2024). Material examined: BN, PKQ, PVS, ROP, ROB.

Notes: 

Craspedolepta malachitica was first published from Bulgaria by Maryańska-Nadachowska et al. (1992), which was overlooked by Pramatarova et al. (2024).

Craspedolepta nebulosa (Zetterstedt, 1828)

Diagnosis: 

Adult and fifth-instar immature. Ossiannilsson (1992).

Feeds on: 

In Bulgaria, adults were collected on Epilobium angustifolium L. (Głowacka and Harizanov 1983, Pramatarova et al. 2024), the only known host plant (Ossiannilsson 1992).

Distribution: 

General distribution. Holarctic. Distribution in Bulgaria (Fig. 21). Published records: RPR, RPW (Głowacka and Harizanov 1983, Pramatarova et al. 2024). Material examined: PVV, RPP, RPR.

Figure 21.  

Distribution of Craspedolepta nebulosa (Zetterstedt, 1828) in Bulgaria.

Craspedolepta nervosa (Foerster, 1848)

Diagnosis: 

Adult (Fig. 22a) and fifth-instar immature. Ossiannilsson (1992).

Figure 22.

Craspedolepta nervosa (Foerster, 1848).

aCraspedolepta nervosa, adult male;  
bDistribution of Craspedolepta nervosa in Bulgaria.  
Feeds on: 

We collected adults on Achillea sp. in Bulgaria (Pramatarova et al. 2024). Mainly confirmed from Achillea millefolium L. in literature (Conci et al. 1993, Ossiannilsson 1992), but probably more widely oligophagous, as it was reported from Achillea, Anthemis and Tanacetum spp. (Gegechkori and Loginova 1990) and reared on Cirsium arvense (Ossiannilsson 1992).

Distribution: 

General distribution. Palaearctic. Distribution in Bulgaria: (Fig. 22b). Published records: PVS, ROO, ROP, RRW, SBW (Joakimov 1909, Klimaszewski 1965, Głowacka and Harizanov 1983, Pramatarova et al. 2024). Material examined: DM, PVV, ROO, ROV, RPR, RRE, SBM, SBW.

Craspedolepta omissa Wagner, 1944

Diagnosis: 

Adult (Fig. 23a). Loginova (1963a), Klimaszewski (1975).

Figure 23.

Craspedolepta omissa Wagner, 1944.

aCraspedolepta omissa, adult female;  
bDistribution of Craspedolepta omissa in Bulgaria.  
Feeds on: 

Adults were collected on Artemisia vulgaris L. in Bulgaria (Głowacka and Harizanov 1983, Pramatarova et al. 2024), which is a confirmed host plant (Conci et al. 1993).

Distribution: 

General distribution. Central and Eastern Europe, Turkey, Russia (European part, Siberia and Far East), Central Asia, Mongolia (Gegechkori and Loginova 1990). Distribution in Bulgaria: (Fig. 23b). Published records: RPR, RRW (Głowacka and Harizanov 1983, Pramatarova et al. 2024). Material examined: RPR, ROP.

Craspedolepta pontica Dobreanu & Manolache, 1962

Diagnosis: 

Adult (Fig. 24a). Dobreanu and Manolache (1962), as C. nervosa pontica; Loginova (1962), as C. inarticulata Loginova, 1962; Loginova (1964).

Figure 24.

Craspedolepta pontica Dobreanu & Manolache, 1962.

aCraspedolepta pontica, adult female;  
bDistribution of Craspedolepta pontica in Bulgaria.  
Feeds on: 

According to Lauterer (1965) and Baeva (1985), the host plant of C. pontica is Achillea millefolium L. According to Gegechkori and Loginova (1990), the host plants belong to the plant genera Achillea, Anthemis and Tanacetum. In Bulgaria, we collected adults of C. pontica on Achillea clypeolata Sm. (Pramatarova et al. 2024), which is a probable host plant.

Distribution: 

General distribution. Central and South-eastern Europe, Caucasus, Middle East, Central Asia. Distribution in Bulgaria (Fig. 24b). Published records: ROM, RRW (Głowacka and Harizanov 1983, Pramatarova et al. 2024). Material examined: DEP, DM, PBT, ROM, ROP, ROV.

Craspedolepta subpunctata (Foerster, 1848)

Diagnosis: 

Adult and fifth-instar immature. Ossiannilsson (1992).

Feeds on: 

Adults were collected on Epilobium angustifolium L. in Bulgaria (Głowacka and Harizanov 1983, Pramatarova et al. 2024), which is the only confirmed host plant (Ossiannilsson 1992).

Distribution: 

General distribution. Holarctic. Distribution in Bulgaria (Fig. 25). Published records: RPR, RRW (Głowacka and Harizanov 1983, Pramatarova et al. 2024). Material examined: PVV, RPR.

Figure 25.  

Distribution of Craspedolepta subpunctata (Foerster, 1848) in Bulgaria.

Genus Eumetoecus Loginova, 1961

Eumetoecus kochiae (Horváth, 1897)

Diagnosis: 

Adult (Fig. 26a). Loginova (1961).

Figure 26.

Eumetoecus kochiae (Horváth, 1897).

aEumetoecus kochiae, adult male;  
bDistribution of Eumetoecus kochiae in Bulgaria.  
Feeds on: 

In Bulgaria, adults were collected by P. Lauterer on Bassia laniflora (S.G.Gmel.) A.J.Scott (= Kochia arenaria (Maerkl.) Roth), which was reported as a host plant in the original description (Horváth 1897). Loginova (1961) and Gegechkori and Loginova (1990) listed Bassia prostrata (L.) Beck and Camphorosma monspeliaca L. as host plants.

Distribution: 

General distribution. South-eastern Europe, Caucasus, Russia (European part, western Siberia), Middle East, Central Asia, Mongolia. Distribution in Bulgaria (Fig. 26b). Published records: Bulgaria, without locality data (Gegechkori and Loginova 1990). Material examined: BN.

Genus Rhodochlanis Loginova, 1964

Rhodochlanis bicolor (Scott, 1880)

Diagnosis: 

Adult (Fig. 27a). Burckhardt (1989); Klimaszewski (1961a), as Craspedolepta salicorniae; Conci and Tamanini (1984b), as R. salicorniae. Fifth-instar immature. Conci and Tamanini (1984b), as R. salicorniae.

Figure 27.

Rhodochlanis bicolor (Scott, 1880).

aRhodochlanis bicolor, adult female;  
bDistribution of Rhodochlanis bicolor in Bulgaria.  
Feeds on: 

Oligophagous on Petrosimonia, Salicornia, Salsola and Suaeda spp. (Conci and Tamanini 1984b, Burckhardt 1989). In Bulgaria, adults were collected on Salicornia europaea L. (Klimaszewski 1961a, Pramatarova et al. 2024), which is a probable host plant.

Distribution: 

General distribution. Southern and Eastern Europe, Caucasus, Middle East, Central Asia, Mongolia. Distribution in Bulgaria (Fig. 27b). Published records: BS (Klimaszewski 1961a), as Craspedolepta salicorniae; (Pramatarova et al. 2024). Material examined: BS.

Notes: 

Klimaszewski (1961a) described Craspedolepta salicorniae Klimaszewski, 1961 as a new species from the Bulgarian Black Sea Coast (Burgas). According to Burckhardt (1989), C. salicorniae is a junior synonym of R. bicolor.

Subfamily Rhinocolinae Vondráček, 1957

Genus Agonoscena Enderlein, 1914

Agonoscena pistaciae Burckhardt & Lauterer, 1989

Diagnosis: 

Adult (Fig. 28a) and fifth-instar immature. Burckhardt and Lauterer (1989), Rodrigo‐Gómez and Burckhardt (2023).

Figure 28.

Agonoscena pistaciae Burckhardt & Lauterer, 1989.

aAgonoscena pistaciae, adult;  
bDistribution of A. pistaciae in Bulgaria.  
Feeds on: 

In Bulgaria, we collected adults on Pistacia terebinthus L., which is a host plant confirmed by Rodrigo‐Gómez and Burckhardt (2023). In the Middle East, the preferred host plant of A. pistaciae is Pistacia vera L. (Burckhardt and Lauterer 1989, Rodrigo‐Gómez and Burckhardt 2023).

Distribution: 

General distribution. Spain, south-eastern Europe, Caucasus, Middle East, Central Asia (Rodrigo‐Gómez and Burckhardt 2023). Distribution in Bulgaria (Fig. 28b). Published records: ROM, RRE (Burckhardt and Lauterer 1989, Pramatarova et al. 2024). Material examined: ROM, RRE.

Notes: 

The type locality of A. pistaciae is in Bulgaria: Kresna Gorge (Burckhardt and Lauterer 1989).

Agonoscena targionii (Lichtenstein, 1874)

Diagnosis: 

Adult (Fig. 29a) and fifth-instar immature. Burckhardt and Lauterer (1989), Rodrigo‐Gómez and Burckhardt (2023).

Figure 29.

Agonoscena targionii (Lichtenstein, 1874).

aAgonoscena targionii, adult female;  
bDistribution of Agonoscena targionii in Bulgaria.  
Feeds on: 

In Bulgaria, we collected adults on Pistacia terebinthus L., which is one of the known host plants (Spodek et al. 2017, Seljak 2020). Throughout the Mediterranean Region, A. targionii is mainly found on P. lentiscus L. (Burckhardt and Lauterer 1989, Rodrigo‐Gómez and Burckhardt 2023), which does not occur in the Bulgarian flora.

Distribution: 

General distribution. Mediterranean, Middle East. Distribution in Bulgaria (Fig. 29b). Published records: ROM (Pramatarova et al. 2024). Material examined: ROM.

Genus Megagonoscena Burckhardt & Lauterer, 1989

Megagonoscena gallicola Burckhardt & Lauterer, 1989

Diagnosis: 

Adult and fifth-instar immature (Fig. 30a, b). Burckhardt and Lauterer (1989).

Figure 30.

Megagonoscena gallicola Burckhardt & Lauterer, 1989.

aMegagonoscena gallicola, adult male;  
bMegagonoscena gallicola, fifth instar immature;  
cDistribution of Megagonoscena gallicola in Bulgaria.  
Feeds on: 

Inducing galls on Pistacia terebinthus L. (= P. palaestina Boiss.) and P. vera L. (Burckhardt and Lauterer 1989). In Bulgaria, we collected adults and immatures on P. terebinthus, one of the confirmed host plants.

Distribution: 

General distribution. South-eastern Europe, Middle East. Distribution in Bulgaria (Fig. 30c). Published records: ROM, RRW (Burckhardt and Lauterer 1989, Pramatarova et al. 2024). Material examined: ROM, RRW.

Notes: 

The type locality of M. gallicola is in Bulgaria: Kresna (Burckhardt and Lauterer 1989).

Megagonoscena viridis (Baeva, 1963)

Diagnosis: 

Adult (Fig. 31a) and fifth-instar immature. Burckhardt and Lauterer (1989).

Figure 31.

Megagonoscena viridis (Baeva, 1963).

aMegagonoscena viridis, adult male;  
bDistribution of Megagonoscena viridis in Bulgaria.  
Feeds on: 

Oligophagous on Pistacia atlantica Desf., P. terebinthus L. (= P. palaestina Boiss.) and P. vera L. (Burckhardt and Lauterer 1989). In Bulgaria, adults were collected on P. terebinthus.

Distribution: 

General distribution. Bulgaria, Caucasus, Middle East, Central Asia. Distribution in Bulgaria (Fig. 31b). Published records: ROM (Burckhardt and Lauterer 1989). Material examined: ROM.

Genus Rhinocola Foerster, 1848

Rhinocola aceris (Linnaeus, 1758)

Diagnosis: 

Adult (Fig. 32a) and fifth-instar immature. Ossiannilsson (1992).

Figure 32.

Rhinocola aceris (Linnaeus, 1758).

aRhinocola aceris, adult male;  
bDistribution of Rhinocola aceris in Bulgaria.  
Feeds on: 

Adults were collected on Acer sp. in Bulgaria (Głowacka and Harizanov 1983, Pramatarova et al. 2024); Acer spp. are confirmed host plants (Ossiannilsson 1992).

Distribution: 

General distribution. Europe, Caucasus, Middle East. Distribution in Bulgaria (Fig. 32b). Published records: Bulgaria, without locality data (Gegechkori and Loginova 1990); PSL, RRW, SBW (Harizanov and Lauterer 1968, Głowacka and Harizanov 1983, Pramatarova et al. 2024). Material examined: BS, PSL, RRW, SBW, SPW.

Family Calophyidae Vondráček, 1957

Subfamily Calophyinae Vondráček, 1957

Genus Calophya Löw, 1879

Calophya rhois (Löw, 1877)

Diagnosis: 

Adult (Fig. 33a). Vondráček (1957a), Hodkinson and White (1979). Fifth-instar immature. Loginova (1968), White and Hodkinson (1982).

Figure 33.

Calophya rhois (Löw, 1877).

aCalophya rhois, adult male;  
bDistribution of Calophya rhois in Bulgaria.  
Feeds on: 

In Bulgaria, adults and immatures were collected on Cotinus coggygria Scop. (Klimaszewski 1964, Harizanov and Lauterer 1968, our data), which is the confirmed host plant (Burckhardt and Basset 2000, Burckhardt and Mühlethaler 2003).

Distribution: 

General distribution. Europe, Turkey, Caucasus, China. Distribution in Bulgaria (Fig. 33b). Published records: BN, RRW (Klimaszewski 1964, Harizanov and Lauterer 1968). Material examined: BS, ROP, RRW, SPW.

Notes: 

Calophya rhois was apparently introduced into several countries of central and western Europe together with its host plant, Cotinus cogyggria, which is often planted as an ornamental in parks and gardens (Burckhardt and Mühlethaler 2003, Mifsud et al. 2010). Burckhardt and Basset (2000) and Burckhardt and Mühlethaler (2003) hypothesised that C. rhois is native to East Asia and was introduced to Europe and the Caucasus. However, Cotinus cogyggria has a very wide range extending from the southern parts of Central Europe to central and southern China and is also considered native to the Bulgarian flora (Assyov et al. 2012, POWO 2024). Calophya rhois is common in southern Europe and has been listed amongst the native species of psyllids in Italy (Conci et al. 1996), Slovenia (Seljak 2020) and north-eastern Turkey (Burckhardt 1988). Therefore, it is possible that C. rhois is an autochthonous species occurring spontaneously in natural habitats at least in the southern parts of Bulgaria. On the other hand, C. cogyggria is also often planted as an ornamental plant in Bulgaria. Our record from SPW was made along a road near an agricultural field, where C. cogyggria and C. rhois were apparently introduced.

Family Carsidaridae Crawford, 1911

Subfamily Homotominae Heslop-Harrison, 1958

Genus Homotoma Guérin-Méneville, 1844

Homotoma ficus (Linnaeus, 1758)

Diagnosis: 

Adult (Fig. 34b). Loginova (1964), Tamanini (1965), Jerinić-Prodanović (2011). Fifth-instar immature. Rapisarda (1989), as H. viridis; Jerinić-Prodanović (2011).

Figure 34.

Homotoma ficus (Linnaeus, 1758).

aHomotoma ficus, adult male;  
bDistribution of Homotoma ficus in Bulgaria.  
Feeds on: 

In Bulgaria, Klimaszewski (1961b), Harizanov (1963) and we collected adults and immatures on Ficus carica L., which is a confirmed host plant (Rapisarda 1989, Burckhardt 1989, Jerinić-Prodanović 2011).

Distribution: 

General distribution. Native to Mediterranean parts of Europe, North Africa, Ukraine, Caucasus, Middle East and Iran; alien in Great Britain, Central and south-eastern Europe, Serbia and USA. Distribution in Bulgaria (Fig. 34b). Published records: BS, PBB, PSP, ROP, ROT (Klimaszewski 1961b, Tsalev 1961, Harizanov 1963, Głowacka 1989). Material examined: BN, BS, ROM, ROP.

Notes: 

Klimaszewski (1961b) described Homotoma viridis Klimaszewski, 1961 partly based on material from Bulgaria (paratypes from Petrich). This taxon is considered a synonym of H. ficus (Burckhardt 1989). Ficus carica L. is not native to the Bulgarian flora (POWO 2024), but it is cultivated as a fruit crop in yards and farms and naturalised in southern parts of the country and along the Black Sea coast (Assyov et al. 2012). Homotoma ficus is consequently an alien species in Bulgaria.

Family Liviidae Löw, 1879

Subfamily Euphyllurinae Crawford, 1914

Genus Euphyllura Foerster, 1848

Euphyllura phillyreae Foerster, 1848

Diagnosis: 

Adult (Fig. 35a). Lauterer et al. (1986). Fifth-instar immature. Loginova (1973).

Figure 35.

Euphyllura phillyreae Foerster, 1848.

aEuphyllura phillyreae, adult;  
bDistribution of Euphyllura phillyreae in Bulgaria.  
Feeds on: 

According to Lauterer et al. (1986), E. phillyreae is oligophagous on the plant genera Olea, Osmanthus and Phillyrea. In Bulgaria, we collected adults and immatures on Phillyrea latifolia L., which is one of the confirmed host plants.

Distribution: 

General distribution. Mediterranean, Ukraine, south-western Russia, Caucasus, Middle East. Distribution in Bulgaria (Fig. 35b). Published records: Bulgaria, without locality data (Gegechkori and Loginova 1990). Material examined: BS, PBS, ROM, ROP, RRE.

Genus Psyllopsis Löw, 1879

Psyllopsis discrepans (Flor, 1861)

Diagnosis: 

Adult and fifth-instar immature. Loginova (1954), Ossiannilsson (1992).

Feeds on: 

Oligophagous on Fraxinus spp. (Conci and Tamanini 1990, Ossiannilsson 1992). In Bulgaria, adults and immatures were collected on Fraxinus sp. (Głowacka and Harizanov 1983).

Distribution: 

General distribution. Europe, Caucasus, alien in North America. Distribution in Bulgaria (Fig. 36). Published records: BS, RRW (Klimaszewski 1965, Głowacka and Harizanov 1983, Głowacka 1989). Material examined: PVS.

Figure 36.  

Distribution of Psyllopsis discrepans (Flor, 1861) in Bulgaria.

Psyllopsis distinguenda Edwards, 1913

Diagnosis: 

Adult. Hodkinson and White (1979), Conci and Tamanini (1990). Fifth-instar immature. White and Hodkinson (1982).

Feeds on: 

Oligophagous on Fraxinus angustifolia Vahl (including subsp. oxycarpa (M.Bieb. ex Willd.) Franco & Rocha Afonso) and F. excelsior L. (Conci and Tamanini 1990). In Bulgaria, we collected adults on Fraxinus sp.

Distribution: 

General distribution. Europe, Caucasus. Distribution in Bulgaria (Fig. 37). Material examined: DW.

Figure 37.  

Distribution of Psyllopsis distinguenda Edwards, 1913 in Bulgaria.

Notes: 

New record for Bulgaria.

Psyllopsis dobreanuae Loginova, 1971

Diagnosis: 

Adult (Fig. 38a). Dobreanu and Manolache (1962), as P. meliphila; Loginova (1971), Conci and Tamanini (1990). Fifth-instar immature (Fig. 38b).

Figure 38.

Psyllopsis dobreanuae Loginova, 1971.

aPsyllopsis dobreanuae, adult male;  
bPsyllopsis dobreanuae, fifth instar immature;  
cDistribution of Psyllopsis dobreanuae in Bulgaria.  
Feeds on: 

The only known host plant so far is Fraxinus excelsior L. (Dobreanu and Manolache 1962, Conci and Tamanini 1990). In Bulgaria, we collected adults and immatures on Fraxinus sp.

Distribution: 

General distribution. Romania, North Macedonia, Moldova (Loginova 1971, Malenovský and Jerinić-Prodanović 2011). Distribution in Bulgaria (Fig. 38c). Material examined: PBS.

Notes: 

New record for Bulgaria.

Psyllopsis fraxini (Linnaeus, 1758)

Diagnosis: 

Adult (Fig. 39a). Conci and Tamanini (1990), Ossiannilsson (1992). Fifth-instar immature. Ossiannilsson (1992), White and Hodkinson (1982).

Figure 39.

Psyllopsis fraxini (Linnaeus, 1758).

aPsyllopsis fraxini, adult female;  
bDistribution of Psyllopsis fraxini in Bulgaria.  
Feeds on: 

Oligophagous on Fraxinus spp. (Conci and Tamanini 1990), on which we also collected adults in Bulgaria.

Distribution: 

General distribution. Europe (Conci and Tamanini 1990), alien in Australia, New Zealand and North America. Distribution in Bulgaria (Fig. 39b). Material examined: SPE.

Notes: 

New record for Bulgaria.

Psyllopsis fraxinicola (Foerster, 1848)

Diagnosis: 

Adult and fifth-instar immature. Conci and Tamanini (1990), Ossiannilsson (1992).

Feeds on: 

Oligophagous on Fraxinus spp. (Conci and Tamanini 1990). In Bulgaria, adults and immatures were collected on Fraxinus excelsior L. (Głowacka and Harizanov 1983, our data).

Distribution: 

Europe, North Africa, Caucasus, Middle East, Kazakhstan; alien in Australia, New Zealand, North and South America. Distribution in Bulgaria (Fig. 40). Published records: RRW, PVS (Głowacka and Harizanov 1983, Pramatarova et al. 2023). Material examined: BS, DM, PSC, PVS, ROM, RPR, RRE.

Figure 40.  

Distribution of Psyllopsis fraxinicola (Foerster, 1848) in Bulgaria.

Psyllopsis machinosa Loginova, 1963

Diagnosis: 

Adult. Loginova (1963b).

Feeds on: 

The known host plants are Fraxinus angustifolia subsp. oxycarpa (M.Bieb. ex Willd.) Franco & Rocha Afonso (Gegechkori and Loginova 1990) and F. a. subsp. syriaca (Boiss.) Yalt. (Spodek et al. 2017). In Bulgaria, adults were collected on Fraxinus excelsior L. (Lauterer 1993), which is another probable host plant species.

Distribution: 

General distribution. South-eastern Europe, Middle East, Central Asia. Distribution in Bulgaria (Fig. 41). Published records: PSP (Lauterer 1993). Material examined: BS, PSP.

Figure 41.  

Distribution of Psyllopsis machinosa Loginova, 1963 in Bulgaria.

Psyllopsis meliphila Löw, 1881

Diagnosis: 

Adult. Loginova (1971), Conci and Tamanini (1990). Fifth-instar immature. Rapisarda (1998).

Feeds on: 

In Bulgaria, adults and immatures were collected on Fraxinus ornus L. (Lauterer 1979), which is the only confirmed host plant species for P. meliphila (Conci and Tamanini 1990).

Distribution: 

General distribution. Southern parts of Central and south-eastern Europe (Conci and Tamanini 1990). Distribution in Bulgaria (Fig. 42). Published records: Bulgaria, without locality data (Maryańska-Nadachowska 2002), ROM, ROP, RPP, RPR (Lauterer 1979, Głowacka 1989). Material examined: BN, BS, ROM, ROP, ROT, ROV, RPP, RPR.

Figure 42.  

Distribution of Psyllopsis meliphila Löw, 1881 in Bulgaria.

Genus Strophingia Enderlein, 1914

Strophingia cinereae Hodkinson, 1971

Diagnosis: 

Adult and fifth-instar immature. Hodkinson (1981), Ossiannilsson (1992).

Feeds on: 

In Bulgaria, we collected adults on Erica arborea L., which is one of the confirmed host plants (Hodkinson 1981).

Distribution: 

General distribution. Great Britain, Mediterranean parts of Europe and North Africa. Distribution in Bulgaria (Fig. 43). Material examined: PBS.

Figure 43.  

Distribution of Strophingia cinereae Hodkinson, 1971 in Bulgaria.

Notes: 

New record for Bulgaria. Strophingia cinereae has so far only been collected in the Strandzha Mountains near the Black Sea coast in the south-eastern part of the country in a habitat of nature conservation importance 'Strandzha heaths of tree heather (Erica arborea) and common heather (Calluna vulgaris)' (Gussev 2015).

Strophingia ericae (Curtis, 1835)

Diagnosis: 

Adult (Fig. 44a) and fifth-instar immature. Hodkinson (1981), Ossiannilsson (1992).

Figure 44.

Strophingia ericae (Curtis, 1835).

aStrophingia ericae, adult female;  
bDistribution of Strophingia ericae in Bulgaria.  
Feeds on: 

In Bulgaria, we collected adults on Calluna vulgaris (L.) Hull., which is a confirmed host plant (Hodkinson 1981).

Distribution: 

General distribution. Europe. Distribution in Bulgaria (Fig. 44b). Material examined: PBS.

Notes: 

New record for Bulgaria. Strophingia ericae is widespread in western, northern and central Europe (Lauterer 1976, Hodkinson 1981, Ossiannilsson 1992, Serbina et al. 2020, Seljak 2020). In Bulgaria, however, it is restricted to the Strandzha Mountains in the south-east of the country, the only region in the country where its host plant, Calluna vulgaris, occurs (Assyov et al. 2012). The Strandzha heaths are a habitat of conservation importance (Gussev 2015), where Calluna vulgaris occurs together with Erica arborea, the host plant of Strophingia cinereae, which has also been recorded there (see above).

Subfamily Liviinae Löw, 1879

Genus Aphorma Hodkinson, 1974

Aphorma lichenoides (Puton, 1898)

Diagnosis: 

Adult. Conci et al. (1983). Fifth-instar immature. Burckhardt and Mifsud (2003).

Distribution: 

General distribution. Great Britain, southern parts of Europe, North Africa, Turkey. Distribution in Bulgaria (Fig. 45). Material examined: PBS.

Figure 45.  

Distribution of Aphorma lichenoides (Puton, 1898) in Bulgaria.

Notes: 

New record for Bulgaria.

Genus Camarotoscena Haupt, 1935

Camarotoscena speciosa (Flor, 1861)

Diagnosis: 

Adult (Fig. 46a) and fifth-instar immature. Ossiannilsson (1992).

Figure 46.

Camarotoscena speciosa (Flor, 1861).

aCamaratoscena speciosa, adult;  
bDistribution of Camaratoscena speciosa in Bulgaria.  
Feeds on: 

Oligophagous on Populus spp. (Burckhardt et al. 2023). In Bulgaria, we collected adults on Populus nigra L., which is one of the confirmed host plants.

Distribution: 

General distribution. Europe, Caucasus, Middle East, Central Asia, China, Mongolia. Distribution in Bulgaria (Fig. 46b). Published records: RRW (Głowacka and Harizanov 1983). Material examined: PKZ, RPM.

Camarotoscena subrubescens (Flor, 1861)

Diagnosis: 

Adult. Loginova (1975).

Feeds on: 

In Bulgaria, adults were collected on Populus nigra L. by P. Lauterer. This is one of the confirmed host plants (Burckhardt et al. 2023).

Distribution: 

General distribution. Southern Europe, Turkey. Distribution in Bulgaria (Fig. 47). Material examined: ROM, ROP.

Figure 47.  

Distribution of Camarotoscena subrubescens (Flor, 1861). in Bulgaria.

Notes: 

New record for Bulgaria.

Genus Livia Latreille, 1802

Livia junci (Schrank, 1789)

Diagnosis: 

Adult (Fig. 48a) and fifth-instar immature. Ossiannilsson (1992), as L. juncorum; Hodkinson and Bird (2000).

Feeds on: 

Collected on Juncus sp. in Bulgaria (Głowacka and Harizanov 1983, Głowacka 1989). Oligophagous on a number of Juncus spp. (Hodkinson and Bird 2000).

Distribution: 

General distribution. Palaearctic. Distribution in Bulgaria (Fig. 48b). Published records: BS, PBT, PVS, PVV, ROP, RRW (Joakimov 1909, Vondráček 1953, Klimaszewski 1965, Głowacka and Harizanov 1983, Głowacka 1989, Pramatarova et al. 2023). Material examined: BS, PVV, ROM, ROP, RPM, RPR, RRE, SBE, SBM, SBW, SPE.

Figure 48.

Livia junci (Schrank, 1789).

aLivia junci, adult female;  
bDistribution of Livia junci in Bulgaria.  

Livia mediterranea Loginova, 1974

Diagnosis: 

Adult. Loginova (1974a), Hodkinson and Bird (2000).

Distribution: 

General distribution. Southern Europe, North Africa, Caucasus, Middle East. Distribution in Bulgaria (Fig. 49). Published records: RRW (Harizanov and Lauterer 1968, as L. crefeldensis); Bulgaria, without locality data (Loginova 1974a, Hodkinson and Bird 2000). Material examined: PBC, PSP.

Figure 49.  

Distribution of Livia mediterranea Loginova, 1974 in Bulgaria.

Notes: 

The type locality of L. mediterranea is in Georgia, but paratypes from Bulgaria (collected by Harizanov, without exact locality data) were also used for the species description (Loginova 1974a, Hodkinson and Bird 2000). The species seems to be rare in Bulgaria, as only a few specimens have been collected so far.

Family Psyllidae Latreille, 1807

Subfamily Acizziinae White & Hodkinson, 1985

Genus Acizzia Heslop-Harrison, 1961

Acizzia jamatonica (Kuwayama, 1908)

Diagnosis: 

Adult (Fig. 50a) and fifth-instar immature. Burckhardt and Mühlethaler (2003).

Figure 50.

Acizzia jamatonica (Kuwayama,1908).

aAcizzia jamatonica, adult male;  
bDistribution of Acizzia jamatonica in Bulgaria.  
Feeds on: 

In Bulgaria, adults and immatures were collected on Albizia julibrissin Durazz., which is the only confirmed host plant (Vétek and Rédei 2009, Harizanova et al. 2012).

Distribution: 

General distribution. Native to Eastern Asia, alien in Southern and Central Europe, Iran and North America. Distribution in Bulgaria (Fig. 50b). Published records: BS, PT, RRE (Vétek and Rédei 2009, Harizanova et al. 2012). Material examined: BN, BS.

Notes: 

Acizzia jamatonica is now widespread and causing cosmetic damage on Albizia julibrissin, planted as an ornamental in parks and private gardens in southern Bulgaria and along the Black Sea coast (Harizanova et al. 2012). The first evidence of this alien psyllid species in Bulgaria dates back to 2009 (Vétek and Rédei 2009).

Subfamily Diaphorininae Vondráček, 1951

Genus Diaphorina Löw, 1880

Diaphorina lycii Loginova, 1978

Diagnosis: 

Adult (Fig. 51a). Loginova (1978), Burckhardt (1984). Fifth-instar immature. Burckhardt (1984).

Figure 51.

Diaphorina lycii Loginova, 1978.

aDiaphorina lycii, adult female;  
bDistribution of Diaphorina lycii in Bulgaria.  
Feeds on: 

Oligophagous on several Lycium spp. (Burckhardt 1984). In Bulgaria, numerous adults were collected on Lycium barbarum L. (= L. halimifolium Mill.) (Loginova 1978, Nakabachi et al. 2020), which is one of the confirmed host plants.

Distribution: 

General distribution. Southern Europe, North Africa, Caucasus, Middle East, Central Asia, Mongolia. Distribution in Bulgaria (Fig. 51b). Published records: BN, BS, PSA, RRW (Loginova 1978, Nakabachi et al. 2020, Pramatarova et al. 2021). Material examined: BN, BS, PSA, RRW.

Notes: 

The type locality of D. lycii is in Turkmenistan (Burckhardt 1984). Paratypes from four localities in Bulgaria (collected by P. Lauterer and A. Merta, MMBC) were listed in the species description by Loginova (1978). In Bulgaria, D. lycii is monophagous on Lycium barbarum, which was imported to Bulgaria as an ornamental shrub, cultivated in parks and gardens for hedges, naturalised in 1900 and has since spread and become invasive in many parts of the country (Petrova et al. 2013). Diaphorina lycii should also be considered as an alien species in the Bulgarian fauna. The oldest documented specimens from Bulgaria were collected in 1973 (Loginova 1978).

Subfamily Psyllinae Latreille, 1807

Genus Arytaina Foerster, 1848

Arytaina genistae (Latreille, 1804)

Diagnosis: 

Adult and fifth-instar immature. Hodkinson and Hollis (1987), Ossiannilsson (1992).

Distribution: 

General distribution. Europe, alien in North America. Distribution in Bulgaria (Fig. 52). Published records: RRW (Klimaszewski 1965, Głowacka and Harizanov 1983).

Figure 52.  

Distribution of Arytaina genistae (Latreille, 1804) in Bulgaria.

Notes: 

Arytaina genistae is particularly widespread in the western parts of Europe. The only records for Bulgaria were published by Klimaszewski (1965) from the western Rhodope Mountains. These specimens should be re-examined to exclude the possibility that they do not belong to the similar A. maculata, which is common in the south-western part of the country.

Arytaina maculata (Löw, 1886)

Diagnosis: 

Adult (Fig. 53a). Hodkinson and Hollis (1987). Fifth-instar immature. Loginova (1976).

Figure 53.

Arytaina maculata (Löw, 1866).

aArytaina maculata, adult female;  
bDistribution of Arytaina maculata in Bulgaria.  
Feeds on: 

Arytaina maculata is narrowly oligophagous on Chamaecytisus spp., a taxonomically difficult group in the Balkans. Arytaina maculata was recorded by Klimaszewski (1970) on Ch. ratisbonensis (Schaeff.) Rotm. from Bulgaria (Yakoruda), by Andrianova and Klimaszewski (1983) on Ch. borysthenicus (Gruner) from south-western Russia, by Conci et al. (1993) from Italy on Ch. spinescens Rothm. and by Malenovský et al. (2011) on Ch. austriacus (L.) Link from Czechia. We collected many adult and immature specimens of A. maculata in south-western Bulgaria on Chamaecytisus austriacus subsp. stefanoffii (Stoj.) Kuzmanov and many adults also on Chamaecytisus eriocarpus (Boiss.) Rothm. - the former is thus a newly-confirmed and the latter a probable host plant.

Distribution: 

General distribution. Central and south-eastern Europe. Distribution in Bulgaria (Fig. 53b). Published records: ROP, RPM, RPP, RRW, SBW (Klimaszewski 1965, Klimaszewski 1970, Głowacka and Harizanov 1983, Głowacka 1989, Lauterer 1993, Pramatarova et al. 2021, Pramatarova et al. 2023). Material examined: ROB, ROM, ROP, RPM, RPP, RPR, RPS, RRE, RRW, SBM, SBW.

Genus Arytainilla Loginova, 1972

Arytainilla spartiicola (Šulc, 1907)

Diagnosis: 

Adult (Fig. 54a) and fifth-instar immature. Conci and Tamanini (1985a).

Figure 54.

Arytainilla spartiicola (Šulc, 1907).

aArytainilla spartiicola, adult female;  
bDistribution of Arytainilla spartiicola in Bulgaria.  
Feeds on: 

The host plants known to date are Cytisus scoparius (L.) Link (Šulc 1907, Burckhardt 1983) and C. decumbens (Durande) Spach (Conci and Tamanini 1985a). Here, we report Cytisus agnipilus Velen. as a new host plant species confirmed by the presence of immatures in Bulgaria.

Distribution: 

General distribution. France, Germany, Switzerland, Italy. Distribution in Bulgaria (Fig. 54b). Material examined: SBW.

Notes: 

New record for Bulgaria and the Balkan Peninsula. Arytainilla spartiicola is a rare species, previously known only from a few localities in Europe (Šulc 1907, Burckhardt 1983, Conci and Tamanini 1985a).

Genus Cacopsylla Ossiannilsson, 1970

Cacopsylla abdominalis (Meyer-Dür, 1871)

Diagnosis: 

Adult (Fig. 55a). Loginova (1967), Lauterer and Burckhardt (1997).

Figure 55.

Cacopsylla abdominalis (Meyer-Dür, 1871).

aCacopsylla abdominalis, adult male;  
bDistribution of Cacopsylla abdominalis in Bulgaria.  
Distribution: 

General distribution. Europe, Caucasus, Central Asia, Mongolia, Russian Far East, South Korea (Cho et al. 2020). Distribution in Bulgaria (Fig. 55b). Material examined: PBS, RPM, RPP, RPR.

Notes: 

New record for Bulgaria.

Cacopsylla affinis (Löw, 1880)

Diagnosis: 

Adult and fifth-instar immature. Ossiannilsson (1992), Burckhardt (2010).

Feeds on: 

Collected on Crataegus spp. in Bulgaria (Etropolska et al. 2015), which are confirmed host plants (Ossiannilsson 1992).

Distribution: 

General distribution. Europe, Turkey, Caucasus. Distribution in Bulgaria (Fig. 56). Published records: PKQ, PSL, RPP, RRW, SBM (Lauterer 1982, Głowacka and Harizanov 1983, Głowacka 1989, Etropolska et al. 2015). Material examined: PBS, PBT, PSI, PT, PVV, RPM, RPP, RPR, RRE, RRW, SBE, SBM, SBW.

Figure 56.  

Distribution of Cacopsylla affinis (Löw, 1880) in Bulgaria.

Cacopsylla albipes (Flor, 1861)

Diagnosis: 

Adult. Vondráček (1957a), Hodkinson and White (1979), Burckhardt (2010). Fifth-instar immature. Burckhardt (2010).

Distribution: 

General distribution. Europe (except north), Turkey, Caucasus. Distribution in Bulgaria (Fig. 57). Published records: RRW (Harizanov and Lauterer 1968, Głowacka and Harizanov 1983). Material examined: PVV, RRW, SPW.

Figure 57.  

Distribution of Cacopsylla albipes (Flor, 1861) in Bulgaria.

Cacopsylla ambigua (Foerster, 1848)

Diagnosis: 

Adult. Ossiannilsson (1992), Lauterer and Burckhardt (1997). Fifth-instar immature. Ossiannilsson (1992).

Feeds on: 

Collected on Salix sp. in Bulgaria (Głowacka and Harizanov 1983). Oligophagous on several Salix spp. (Ossiannilsson 1992, Lauterer and Burckhardt 1997, Percy and Cronk 2020).

Distribution: 

General distribution. Palaearctic. Distribution in Bulgaria (Fig. 58). Published records: RRW (Klimaszewski 1965, Głowacka and Harizanov 1983). Material examined: ROP, RPM, RPP, SBM.

Figure 58.  

Distribution of Cacopsylla ambigua (Foerster, 1848) in Bulgaria.

Cacopsylla bidens (Šulc, 1907)

Diagnosis: 

Adult. Burckhardt and Hodkinson (1986), Burckhardt (2010), Valle et al. (2017). Fifth-instar immature. Burckhardt and Hodkinson (1986), Burckhardt (2010).

Feeds on: 

Oligophagous on Pyrus; the previously known hosts were P. communis L., P. pyraster (L.) Burgsd. and P. syriaca Boiss. (Burckhardt and Hodkinson 1986, Cho et al. 2017b). In Bulgaria, adults were collected on P. communis by Głowacka (1989) and Etropolska et al. (2015) and on P. spinosa Forrsk. by us; the latter is also a probable host.

Distribution: 

General distribution. Central and southern Europe, North Africa, Middle East, Central Asia, India, Mongolia, China; alien in South America. Distribution in Bulgaria (Fig. 59). Published records: PK, PKQ, PSA, PSL, ROP (Głowacka 1989, Etropolska et al. 2015, Pramatarova et al. 2023). Material examined: BN, DEL, PBS, PSA, ROM, ROV.

Figure 59.  

Distribution of Cacopsylla bidens (Šulc, 1907) in Bulgaria.

Cacopsylla breviantennata (Flor, 1861)

Diagnosis: 

Adult. Vondráček (1957a), Burckhardt (2010). Fifth-instar immature. Burckhardt (2010).

Distribution: 

General distribution. Central and Southern Europe, North Africa, Turkey, Caucasus. Distribution in Bulgaria (Fig. 60). Published records: PVV, SBM (Klimaszewski 1970, Pramatarova et al. 2023). Material examined: PVV, RPP, RPR, RRE, SBW, SPW.

Figure 60.  

Distribution of Cacopsylla breviantennata (Flor, 1861) in Bulgaria.

Cacopsylla brunneipennis (Edwards, 1896)

Diagnosis: 

Adult. Ossiannilsson (1992), Lauterer and Burckhardt (1997). Fifth-instar immature. Ossiannilsson (1992).

Feeds on: 

Reported from Salix sp. in Bulgaria (Głowacka and Harizanov 1983). Oligophagous on several Salix spp. (Ossiannilsson 1992, Lauterer and Burckhardt 1997, Percy and Cronk 2020).

Distribution: 

General distribution. Europe, Caucasus, Middle East, Central Asia. Distribution in Bulgaria (Fig. 61). Published records: RPP, RRW (Głowacka and Harizanov 1983, as Cacopsylla klapaleki; Głowacka 1989). Material examined: PT, PVS, PVV, RPP, RPR, RRW, SBW.

Figure 61.  

Distribution of Cacopsylla brunneipennis (Edwards, 1896) in Bulgaria.

Cacopsylla corcontum (Šulc, 1909)

Diagnosis: 

Adult and fifth-instar immature. Ossiannilsson (1992), Burckhardt (2010).

Feeds on: 

Collected on Sorbus aucuparia L. in Bulgaria (Głowacka and Harizanov 1983), which is a confirmed host plant (Ossiannilsson 1992).

Distribution: 

General distribution. Central and northern Europe. Distribution in Bulgaria (Fig. 62). Published records: RPP, RRW (Głowacka and Harizanov 1983, Głowacka 1989). Material examined: RPR.

Figure 62.  

Distribution of Cacopsylla corcontum (Šulc, 1909) in Bulgaria.

Cacopsylla crataegi (Schrank, 1801)

Diagnosis: 

Adult and fifth-instar immature. Ossiannilsson (1992), Burckhardt (2010).

Distribution: 

General distribution. Europe, North Africa, Caucasus, Middle East, India. Distribution in Bulgaria (Fig. 63). Published records: PSI, PSP, PVS, ROP, RRW, SBW (Joakimov 1909, Klimaszewski 1965, Harizanov and Lauterer 1968, Głowacka and Harizanov 1983, Pramatarova et al. 2021, Pramatarova et al. 2023). Material examined: BN, DEL, DEP, PBS, PKQ, PKZ, PSA, PSI, PSP, PT, PVL, PVV, ROM, ROP, RPM, RPP, RPR, RRE, RRW, SBE, SBM, SBW, SPM, SPW.

Figure 63.  

Distribution of Cacopsylla crataegi (Schrank, 1801) in Bulgaria.

Cacopsylla mali (Schmidberger, 1836)

Diagnosis: 

Adult and fifth-instar immature. Ossiannilsson (1992), Burckhardt (2010).

Feeds on: 

Collected on Malus domestica (Suckow) Borkh. in Bulgaria (Głowacka and Harizanov 1983, Etropolska et al. 2015), which is a confirmed host plant (Ossiannilsson 1992).

Distribution: 

General distribution. Palaearctic, alien in North America, South Africa and Australia. Distribution in Bulgaria (Fig. 64). Published records: PSL, PVS, ROP, RRW, SBM (Klimaszewski 1970, Głowacka and Harizanov 1983, Głowacka 1989, Etropolska et al. 2015). Material examined: RPP, RPR.

Figure 64.  

Distribution of Cacopsylla mali (Schmidberger, 1836) in Bulgaria.

Cacopsylla melanoneura (Foerster, 1848)

Diagnosis: 

Adult and fifth-instar immature. Ossiannilsson (1992), Burckhardt (2010).

Feeds on: 

In Bulgaria, collected on Crataegus sp. (Głowacka and Harizanov 1983) and Malus domestica (Suckow) Borkh. (Etropolska et al. 2015), which are confirmed host plants (Ossiannilsson 1992).

Distribution: 

General distribution. Palaearctic. Distribution in Bulgaria (Fig. 65). Published records: DEP, PK, PKQ, PSA, PSL, PT, PVL, PVS, PVV, RPM, RPP, RRW, SBM, SBW, SPM (Klimaszewski 1970, Głowacka and Harizanov 1983, Głowacka 1989, Etropolska et al. 2015, Pramatarova et al. 2021, Pramatarova et al. 2023). Material examined: DEL, DEP, PBS, PBT, PKQ, PSI, PVL, PVS, PVV, ROM, ROO, ROP, ROV, RPM, RPP, RPR, RPS, RRE, RRW, SBM, SBW, SPW.

Figure 65.  

Distribution of Cacopsylla melanoneura (Foerster, 1848) in Bulgaria.

Cacopsylla myrtilli (Wagner, 1947)

Diagnosis: 

Adult and fifth-instar immature. Ossiannilsson (1992).

Feeds on: 

In Bulgaria, collected on Vaccinium myrtillus L. (Głowacka 1989), which is a confirmed host plant (Ossiannilsson 1992).

Distribution: 

General distribution. Central, northern and eastern Europe, Russia (European part, Siberia, Far East), Kazakhstan, North America. Distribution in Bulgaria (Fig. 66). Published records: ROV, RPP, RPR (Klimaszewski 1970, Głowacka 1989, Labina et al. 2009, Shapoval et al. 2021, Nokkala et al. 2022). Material examined: RPP, RPR.

Figure 66.  

Distribution of Cacopsylla myrtilli (Wagner, 1947) in Bulgaria.

Cacopsylla nigrita (Zetterstedt, 1828)

Diagnosis: 

Adult. Ossiannilsson (1992), Lauterer and Burckhardt (1997). Fifth-instar immature. Ossiannilsson (1992).

Distribution: 

General distribution. Europe, Caucasus, Kazakhstan (Gegechkori and Loginova 1990). Distribution in Bulgaria (Fig. 67). Published records: RPR (Klimaszewski 1965).

Figure 67.  

Distribution of Cacopsylla nigrita (Zetterstedt, 1828) in Bulgaria.

Cacopsylla notata (Flor, 1861)

Diagnosis: 

Adult and fifth-instar immature. Burckhardt and Hodkinson (1986).

Feeds on: 

In Bulgaria, Głowacka (1989) and the authors collected adults on Pyrus spinosa Forssk., which is one of the confirmed host plants (Burckhardt and Hodkinson 1986, Cho et al. 2017b).

Distribution: 

General distribution. Southern Europe, Middle East. Distribution in Bulgaria (Fig. 68). Published records: ROP (Głowacka 1989). Material examined: ROP, ROV.

Figure 68.  

Distribution of Cacopsylla notata (Flor, 1861) in Bulgaria.

Cacopsylla peregrina (Foerster, 1848)

Diagnosis: 

Adult (Fig. 69a) and fifth-instar immature. Ossiannilsson (1992), Burckhardt (2010).

Figure 69.

Cacopsylla peregrina (Foerster, 1848).

aCacopsylla peregrina, adult male;  
bDistribution of Cacopsylla peregrina in Bulgaria.  
Feeds on: 

Collected on Crataegus sp. in Bulgaria (Głowacka and Harizanov 1983); Crataegus spp. are confirmed host plants (Ossiannilsson 1992).

Distribution: 

General distribution. Palaearctic, alien in North America. Distribution in Bulgaria (Fig. 69b). Published records: PSA, PSC, PSP, PVS, ROP, RRW, SBW (Joakimov 1909, Głowacka and Harizanov 1983, Nokkala et al. 2003, Pramatarova et al. 2021). Material examined: BS, PBS, PSA, PSI, ROM, RPP, RPR, RRE, SBE, SBM, SBW, SPW.

Cacopsylla picta (Foerster, 1848)

Diagnosis: 

Adult and fifth-instar immature. Ossiannilsson (1992), as C. costalis; Burckhardt (2010).

Feeds on: 

In Bulgaria, adults and immatures were collected on Malus domestica (Suckow) Borkh. (Harizanov 1963, Harizanov 1966c, Głowacka and Harizanov 1983, Etropolska et al. 2015), which is a confirmed host plant (Ossiannilsson 1992).

Distribution: 

General distribution. Europe, Turkey. Distribution in Bulgaria (Fig. 70). Published records: BS, PKQ, PSL, PT, PVS, ROT, RRW, SBM, SPM (Harizanov 1963, Harizanov 1966c, Głowacka and Harizanov 1983, as C. costalis; Etropolska et al. 2011, Etropolska et al. 2015). Material examined: RPP, RPR.

Figure 70.  

Distribution of Cacopsylla picta (Foerster, 1848) in Bulgaria.

Cacopsylla pruni (Scopoli, 1763)

Diagnosis: 

Adult (Fig. 71a) and fifth-instar immature. Ossiannilsson (1992), Burckhardt (2010). According to Sauvion et al. (2021), C. pruni is a complex of two cryptic species, informally referred to as 'C. pruni A' and 'C. pruni B', which can be distinguished by molecular characters. Specimens from Bulgaria have not yet been identified as either A or B. Only C. pruni B is known from the Balkans (Sauvion et al. 2021).

Figure 71.

Cacopsylla pruni (Scopoli, 1763).

aCacopsylla pruni, adult female;  
bDistribution of Cacopsylla pruni in Bulgaria.  
Feeds on: 

Reported from Prunus cerasifera Ehrh., P. insititia L., P. domestica L. and P. spinosa L. in Bulgaria, which was also partially confirmed by immatures (Harizanov 1963, Harizanov 1966b, Etropolska et al. 2015).

Distribution: 

General distribution. Europe, North Africa, Caucasus, Middle East, Mongolia (Gegechkori and Loginova 1990, Sauvion et al. 2021). Distribution in Bulgaria (Fig. 71b). Published records: BS, PK, PKQ, PSL, PT, PVS, RPP, RRW (Harizanov 1963, Klimaszewski 1965, Harizanov 1966b, Głowacka and Harizanov 1983, Głowacka 1989, Etropolska et al. 2011, Etropolska et al. 2015, Pramatarova et al. 2023). Material examined: BN, PBS, PBT, PKQ, PKZ, PSC, PSI, PSP, PT, PVL, PVS, PVV, ROO, ROP, RPM, RPP, RPR, RPS, RRE, RRW, RRW, SBE, SBW, SPW.

Cacopsylla pulchella (Löw, 1877)

Diagnosis: 

Adult (Fig. 72a). Loginova (1964), Hodkinson and White (1979). Fifth-instar immature. White and Hodkinson (1982), Burckhardt (1999).

Figure 72.

Cacopsylla pulchella (Löw, 1877).

aCacopsylla pulchella, adult male;  
bDistribution of Cacopsylla pulchella in Bulgaria.  
Feeds on: 

We collected adults and immatures on Cercis siliquastrum L., the only confirmed host plant (Burckhardt 1999).

Distribution: 

General distribution. Southern and south-eastern Europe, Middle East, alien in the Azores, Iberian Peninsula, Great Britain, Central Europe and Belarus. Distribution in Bulgaria (Fig. 72b). Material examined: BN, RRE.

Notes: 

New record for Bulgaria. The host plant of C. pulchella, Cercis siliquastrum is native to Bulgaria (POWO 2024). However, our specimens of C. pulchella were collected on ornamental trees in city gardens.

Cacopsylla pulchra (Zetterstedt, 1840)

Diagnosis: 

Adult. Lauterer and Burckhardt (1997), Ossiannilsson (1992). Fifth-instar immature. Ossiannilsson (1992).

Feeds on: 

Collected on Salix sp. in Bulgaria (Głowacka and Harizanov 1983), Oligophagous on several Salix spp. (Ossiannilsson 1992, Lauterer and Burckhardt 1997, Percy and Cronk 2020).

Distribution: 

General distribution. Palaearctic. Distribution in Bulgaria (Fig. 73). Published records: PK, PVS, ROP, RRW, SBW (Głowacka and Harizanov 1983, Percy and Cronk 2020, Pramatarova et al. 2021, Pramatarova et al. 2023). Material examined: DW, PKZ, PSI, PT, PV, PVS, PVV, ROM, ROP, RPM, RPP, RPR, RRE, RRW, SBW.

Figure 73.  

Distribution of Cacopsylla pulchra (Zetterstedt, 1840) in Bulgaria.

Cacopsylla pyri (Linnaeus, 1758)

Diagnosis: 

Adult and fifth-instar immature. Burckhardt and Hodkinson (1986), Burckhardt (2010).

Feeds on: 

In Bulgaria, adults and immatures were collected on Pyrus communis L. (Harizanov 1963, Harizanov 1966a, Harizanov 1966d, Etropolska et al. 2015), which is a confirmed host plant (Burckhardt and Hodkinson 1986, Cho et al. 2017b).

Distribution: 

General distribution. Europe, Caucasus, Middle East, Central Asia. Distribution in Bulgaria (Fig. 74). Published records: BN, BS, DEP, PK, PKQ, PSL, PT, PVS, PVV, RRE, RRW (Harizanov 1963, Klimaszewski 1965, Harizanov 1966a, Głowacka and Harizanov 1983, Etropolska et al. 2015, Pramatarova et al. 2023). Material examined: BS, DEL, DW, PT, PVV, ROV, RPP, RRE.

Figure 74.  

Distribution of Cacopsylla pyri (Linnaeus, 1758) in Bulgaria.

Cacopsylla pyricola (Foerster, 1848)

Diagnosis: 

Adult and fifth-instar immature. Burckhardt and Hodkinson (1986), Burckhardt (2010).

Feeds on: 

In Bulgaria, collected from Pyrus communis L. (Etropolska et al. 2015), which is a confirmed host plant (Burckhardt and Hodkinson 1986, Cho et al. 2017b).

Distribution: 

General distribution. Europe, Turkey, Caucasus, alien in North America. Distribution in Bulgaria (Fig. 75). Published records: PBS, PK, PKQ, PVS, RRW (Klimaszewski 1965, Głowacka and Harizanov 1983, Etropolska et al. 2011, Etropolska et al. 2015). Material examined: BS, PBS, PSI, ROP, RPR, RRE, SBM, SBW, SPW.

Figure 75.  

Distribution of Cacopsylla pyricola (Foerster, 1848) in Bulgaria.

Cacopsylla pyrisuga (Foerster, 1848)

Diagnosis: 

Adult and fifth-instar immature. Burckhardt and Hodkinson (1986), Burckhardt (2010).

Feeds on: 

In Bulgaria, adults and immatures were collected on Pyrus communis L. (Harizanov 1963, Harizanov 1966e, Etropolska et al. 2015), which is a confirmed host plant (Burckhardt and Hodkinson 1986, Cho et al. 2017b).

Distribution: 

General distribution. Europe, Caucasus, Middle East. Distribution in Bulgaria (Fig. 76). Published records: BN, BS, DEP, PBB, PK, PSC, PSL, PSP, PT, PVS, RPP, RRE, RRW, SBE (Joakimov 1909, Harizanov 1963, Harizanov 1964, Harizanov and Lauterer 1968, Klimaszewski 1965, Głowacka and Harizanov 1983, Etropolska et al. 2011, Etropolska et al. 2015, Pramatarova et al. 2023). Material examined: DEL, PKG, PKZ, PSI, PT, PVV, ROM, ROP, ROV, RPP, RPR, RPS, SBW.

Figure 76.  

Distribution of Cacopsylla pyrisuga (Foerster, 1848) in Bulgaria.

Cacopsylla rhamnicola (Scott, 1876)

Diagnosis: 

Adult (Fig. 77a) and fifth-instar immature. Ossiannilsson (1992).

Figure 77.

Cacopsylla rhamnicola (Scott, 1876).

aCacopsylla rhamnicola, adult male  
bDistribution of Cacopsylla rhamnicola in Bulgaria.  
Feeds on: 

In Bulgaria, we collected adults on Rhamnus cathartica L., which is a confirmed host plant (Ossiannilsson 1992).

Distribution: 

General distribution. Europe, Turkey, Caucasus, Central Asia, Mongolia. Distribution in Bulgaria (Fig. 77b). Material examined: PVV, RRW, SBW.

Notes: 

New record for Bulgaria.

Cacopsylla saliceti (Foerster, 1848)

Diagnosis: 

Adult. Loginova (1967), Lauterer and Burckhardt (1997).

Feeds on: 

Collected on Salix spp. in Bulgaria (Głowacka and Harizanov 1983). Oligophagous on several Salix spp. (Lauterer and Burckhardt 1997, Percy and Cronk 2020).

Distribution: 

General distribution. Europe (except north), Caucasus, Middle East. Distribution in Bulgaria (Fig. 78). Published records: PK, ROP, RPP, RPR, RRW (Klimaszewski 1965, Harizanov and Lauterer 1968, Głowacka and Harizanov 1983, Głowacka 1989, Percy and Cronk 2020). Material examined: BN, DEP, PSI, PT, PVV, ROM, ROP, ROV, RPM, RPP, RPR, RPS, RRE, RRW, SBW.

Figure 78.  

Distribution of Cacopsylla saliceti (Foerster, 1848) in Bulgaria.

Cacopsylla sorbi (Linnaeus, 1767)

Diagnosis: 

Adult and fifth-instar immature. Ossiannilsson (1992).

Feeds on: 

In Bulgaria, collected on Sorbus aucuparia L. (Głowacka and Harizanov 1983), which is a confirmed host plant (Ossiannilsson 1992).

Distribution: 

General distribution. Europe, alien in North America. Distribution in Bulgaria (Fig. 79). Published records: RPP, RRW (Głowacka and Harizanov 1983, Głowacka 1989). Material examined: PVV, RPP, RPR.

Figure 79.  

Distribution of Cacopsylla sorbi (Linnaeus, 1767) in Bulgaria.

Cacopsylla ulmi (Foerster, 1848)

Diagnosis: 

Adult and fifth-instar immature. Ossiannilsson (1992).

Distribution: 

General distribution. Europe, Caucasus, Central Asia, Russia (European part, Siberia and Far East) (Gegechkori and Loginova 1990). Distribution in Bulgaria (Fig. 80). Published records: PVS (Pramatarova et al. 2023). Material examined: PSA, PVS, PVV, RPR, SBM, SPE, SPM.

Figure 80.  

Distribution of Cacopsylla ulmi (Foerster, 1848) in Bulgaria.

Cacopsylla visci (Curtis, 1835)

Diagnosis: 

Adult (Fig. 81a). Vondráček (1957a), Hodkinson and White (1979). Fifth-instar immature. White and Hodkinson (1982).

Figure 81.

Cacopsylla visci (Curtis, 1835).

aCacopsylla visci, adult female;  
bDistribution of Cacopsylla visci in Bulgaria.  
Feeds on: 

We collected adults on Viscum album L., which is one of the confirmed host plants (Burckhardt et al. 2017).

Distribution: 

General distribution. Palaearctic. Distribution in Bulgaria (Fig. 81b). Published records: RPR (Lauterer 1979). Material examined: BS, PBS, RPR.

Genus Livilla Curtis, 1836

Livilla cognata (Löw, 1881)

Diagnosis: 

Adult (Fig. 82a). Vondráček (1957a), Hodkinson and Hollis (1987).

Figure 82.

Livilla cognata (Löw, 1881).

aLivilla cognata, adult male (dark specimen collected in September);  
bDistribution of Livilla cognata in Bulgaria.  
Feeds on: 

Oligophagous on Chamaecytisus spp. and probably also Cytisus and Genista spp. It was recorded from Chamaecytisus ratisbonensis (Schaeff.) Rothm. in Austria (Löw 1888) and Czechia (Lauterer 1965; I. Malenovský, personnal observation), on Genista germanica in Czechia (Lauterer 1965), on Ch. hirsutus (L.) Link and Cytisus nigricans L. in Italy (Conci et al. 1993) and on Ch. heuffelii (Wierzb.) Rothm. in Serbia (Jerinić-Prodanović 2010). In Bulgaria, we collected adults and immatures on Chamaecytisus elongatus (Waldst. & Kit.) Link., which is a newly-confirmed host species. We also repeatedly collected adults on Ch. austriacus subsp. stefanofii (Stoj.) Kuzmanov, which is another probable host.

Distribution: 

General distribution. Central and south-eastern Europe, Caucasus. Distribution in Bulgaria (Fig. 82b). Published records: RPP, RPR, RRW (Klimaszewski 1970, Głowacka and Harizanov 1983, Głowacka 1989). Material examined: ROB, ROO, RPP, RPR, RPS, RRE, SBW.

Livilla horvathi (Scott, 1879)

Diagnosis: 

Adult (Fig. 83a). Vondráček (1957a), Hodkinson and Hollis (1987). Fifth-instar immature (Fig. 83b).

Figure 83.

Livilla horvathi (Scott, 1879).

aLivilla horvathi, adult male;  
bLivilla horvathi, immature;  
cDistribution of Livilla horvathi in Bulgaria.  
Feeds on: 

Livilla horvathi was collected from Chamaecytisus austriacus (L.) Link in Slovenia, Hungary and Slovakia (Löw 1888), Genista tinctoria L. in Romania (Dobreanu and Manolache 1962) and G. sericea Wulfen and G. tinctoria in Italy (Conci et al. 1993). In Bulgaria, we collected adults and one immature on Genista lydia Boiss. and Chamaecytisus elongatus (Waldst. & Kit.) Link, which are also probable host plants.

Distribution: 

General distribution. Central and south-eastern Europe, Turkey. Distribution in Bulgaria (Fig. 83c). Published records: PSA, RPM, RRW (Klimaszewski 1965, Głowacka and Harizanov 1983, Głowacka 1989, Pramatarova et al. 2021). Material examined: DEP, PBS, PBT, PSA, ROM, RPP, RPR, RPS, RRE, SBW.

Livilla radiata (Foerster, 1848)

Diagnosis: 

Adult (Fig. 84a). Vondráček (1957a), Hodkinson and Hollis (1987).

Figure 84.

Livilla radiata (Foerster, 1848).

aLivilla radiata, adult female;  
bDistribution of Livilla radiata in Bulgaria.  
Feeds on: 

Oligophagous on Chamaecytisus austriacus (L.) Link., Ch. borysthenicus (Gruner) Klásk., Ch. heuffelii (Wierzb.) Rothm., Ch. hirsutus (L.) Link, Ch. ratisbonensis (Schaeff.) Rothm., Cytisus nigricans (L.) and Cy. villosus Pourr. (Löw 1888, Klimaszewski 1975, Andrianova and Klimaszewski 1983, Głowacka and Harizanov 1983, Conci et al. 1993, Malenovský et al. 2011). In south-western Bulgaria, we repeatedly collected adults on Ch. austriacus subsp. stefanoffii (Stoj.) Kuzmanov, syntopic with Arytaina maculata and Livilla cognata.

Distribution: 

General distribution. Central and south-eastern Europe. Distribution in Bulgaria (Fig. 84b). Published records: RRW (Klimaszewski 1965, Głowacka and Harizanov 1983). Material examined: ROB, ROP, RPP, RPR, RPS, RRE, RRW, SPM.

Livilla ulicis Curtis, 1836

Diagnosis: 

Adult (Fig. 85a). Vondráček (1957a), Hodkinson and Hollis (1987). Fifth-instar immature. Loginova (1976), White and Hodkinson (1982).

Figure 85.

Livilla ulicis Curtis, 1836.

aLivilla ulicis, adult;  
bDistribution of Livilla ulicis in Bulgaria.  
Distribution: 

General distribution. Europe (except north). Distribution in Bulgaria (Fig. 85b). Published records: PVV, RPR (Joakimov 1909, Klimaszewski 1965). Material examined: PVV, RPP, RPR, RRE, RRW.

Livilla variegata (Löw, 1881)

Diagnosis: 

Adult (Fig. 86a) Hodkinson and Hollis (1987). Fifth-instar immature. White and Hodkinson (1982).

Figure 86.

Livilla variegata (Löw, 1881).

aLivilla variegata, adult male;  
bDistribution of Livilla variegata in Bulgaria.  
Feeds on: 

Both known host plants of L. variegata, Laburnum anagyroides Medik. and L. alpinum (Mill.) Bercht. & J.Presl, are not native to Bulgaria. Our specimens (adults and immatures) were collected on L. anagyroides in ornamental greenery in the Sofia agglomeration. Laburnum anagyroides is frequently planted as an ornamental tree in Bulgaria and spreads in both natural and disturbed habitats (Petrova et al. 2013).

Distribution: 

General distribution. Native to southern and some parts of central Europe (e.g. the Alps), alien in western and other parts of central Europe and North America. Distribution in Bulgaria (Fig. 86b). Material examined: PVS.

Notes: 

New record for Bulgaria.

Genus Psylla Geoffroy, 1762

Psylla alni (Linnaeus, 1758)

Diagnosis: 

Adult (Fig. 87a) and fifth-instar immature. Ossiannilsson (1992).

Figure 87.

Psylla alni (Linnaeus, 1758).

aPsylla alni, adult male.;  
bDistribution of Psylla alni in Bulgaria.  
Feeds on: 

Collected on Alnus glutinosa (L.) Gaertn. (Głowacka and Harizanov 1983), which is one of the confirmed host plants (Ossiannilsson 1992).

Distribution: 

General distribution. Holarctic. Distribution in Bulgaria (Fig. 87b). Published records: ROP, RPP, RRW (Klimaszewski 1965, Głowacka and Harizanov 1983, Głowacka 1989, Pramatarova et al. 2023). Material examined: BN, PKZ, PVS, ROM, ROP, RPM, RPP, RPR.

Psylla alpina Foerster, 1848

Diagnosis: 

Adult (Fig. 88a). Vondráček (1957a).

Figure 88.

Psylla alpina Foerster, 1848.

aPsylla alpina, adult female;  
bDistribution of Psylla alpina in Bulgaria.  
Feeds on: 

We collected adults and immatures on Alnus alnobetula (Ehrh.) K.Koch. (= A. viridis (Chaix) DC.), which is the only confirmed host plant (Lauterer 1979, Seljak 2020).

Distribution: 

General distribution. Mountains in central and south-eastern Europe. Distribution in Bulgaria (Fig. 88b). Published records: RPR (Lauterer 1979). Material examined: RPR.

Psylla colorata Löw, 1888

Diagnosis: 

Adult and fifth instar immature. Burckhardt (1979).

Feeds on: 

Adults were collected by Głowacka and Harizanov (1983) and the authors on Ostrya carpinifolia Scop., which is the only confirmed host plant (Burckhardt 1979, Seljak 2020).

Distribution: 

General distribution. Southern parts of western, central and eastern Europe, Middle East. Distribution in Bulgaria (Fig. 89). Published records: PVS, RRW (Głowacka and Harizanov 1983, Labina 2007, Labina et al. 2014). Material examined: ROV, RPS.

Figure 89.  

Distribution of Psylla colorata Löw, 1888 in Bulgaria.

Psylla foersteri Flor, 1861

Diagnosis: 

Adult (Fig. 90a) and fifth-instar immature. Ossiannilsson (1992).

Figure 90.

Psylla foersteri Flor, 1861.

aPsylla foersteri, adult female;  
bDistribution of Psylla foersteri in Bulgaria.  
Feeds on: 

Alnus spp. (Głowacka 1989); we collected adults on Alnus glutinosa (L.) Gaertn., which is one of the confirmed host plants (Ossiannilsson 1992).

Distribution: 

General distribution. Europe, North Africa, Caucasus, Middle East, alien in New Zealand. Distribution in Bulgaria (Fig. 90b). Published records: PSA, PSP, PVL, PVS, ROP, RRW (Joakimov 1909, Klimaszewski 1965, Głowacka and Harizanov 1983, Głowacka 1989, Pramatarova et al. 2021, Pramatarova et al. 2023). Material examined: BN, PKG, PKZ, PSA, PSP, PVV, ROM, ROP, RPM, RPR.

Psylla fusca (Zetterstedt, 1828)

Diagnosis: 

Adult and fifth-instar immature. Ossiannilsson (1992).

Distribution: 

General distribution. Europe. Distribution in Bulgaria (Fig. 91). Published records: PK (Schaefer 1949). Material examined: PSP, ROM, ROP, RPR.

Figure 91.  

Distribution of Psylla fusca Zetterstedt 1828 in Bulgaria.

Psylla hartigii Flor, 1861

Diagnosis: 

Adult and fifth-instar immature. Ossiannilsson (1992).

Feeds on: 

In Bulgaria, collected on Betula sp. (Głowacka and Harizanov 1983). Oligophagous on Betula spp. (Ossiannilsson 1992).

Distribution: 

General distribution. Holarctic. Distribution in Bulgaria (Fig. 92). Published records: RRW (Głowacka and Harizanov 1983). Material examined: RRW.

Figure 92.  

Distribution of Psylla hartigii Flor, 1861 in Bulgaria.

Genus Spanioneura Foerster, 1848

Spanioneura buxi (Linnaeus, 1758)

Diagnosis: 

Adult (Fig. 93a) and fifth-instar immature. Ossiannilsson (1992).

Figure 93.

Spanioneura buxi (Linnaeus, 1758).

aSpanioneura buxi, adult male;  
bDistribution of Spanioneura buxi in Bulgaria.  
Feeds on: 

Oligophagous on Buxus spp. (Hodkinson and White 1979). In Bulgaria, Głowacka and Harizanov (1983), Głowacka (1989) and the authors collected adults on B. sempervirens L., which is one of the confirmed host species. Buxus sempervirens is not native to Bulgaria (POWO 2024), but is widely cultivated as an ornamental plant.

Distribution: 

General distribution. Western and southern Europe, Caucasus, alien in Central, northern and eastern Europe, North America and Hawaii. Distribution in Bulgaria (Fig. 93b). Published records: ROP, RPP, RRW (Głowacka and Harizanov 1983, Głowacka 1989). Material examined: ROM, PVS.

Notes: Spanioneura buxi is an alien species in Bulgaria.

Spanioneura fonscolombii Foerster, 1848

Diagnosis: 

Adult. Hodkinson and White (1979). Fifth-instar immature. White and Hodkinson (1982).

Feeds on: 

We collected adults on Buxus sempervirens L., which is the only confirmed host plant (Hodkinson and White 1979, Burckhardt and Mühlethaler 2003).

Distribution: 

General distribution. Western and southern Europe, Caucasus (Gegechkori and Loginova 1990), alien in central, northern and eastern Europe, North America and Australia (Oswald 2022, Prunar et al. 2023). Distribution in Bulgaria (Fig. 94). Material examined: PVS.

Figure 94.  

Distribution of Spanioneura fonscolombii Foerster, 1848 in Bulgaria.

Notes: 

New record for Bulgaria. Spanioneura fonscolombii has spread in Europe on cultivated box trees in the last two decades. Our record from Bulgaria (from ornamental greenery in a city park) is further evidence of its expansion after the recent records in Romania, Austria and other countries (Oswald 2022, Prunar et al. 2023).

Family Triozidae Löw, 1879

Genus Bactericera Puton, 1876

Bactericera albiventris (Foerster, 1848)

Diagnosis: 

Adult (Fig. 95a) and fifth-instar immature. Ossiannilsson (1992), Burckhardt and Lauterer (1997b).

Figure 95.

Bactericera albiventris (Foerster, 1848).

aBactericera albiventris, adult female;  
bDistribution of Bactericera albiventris in Bulgaria.  
Feeds on: 

Oligophagous on several Salix spp. (Głowacka 1989, Ossiannilsson 1992, Burckhardt and Lauterer 1997b, Percy and Cronk 2020). We collected adults on Salix alba L., which is one of the confirmed host plants.

Distribution: 

General distribution. Palaearctic. Distribution in Bulgaria (Fig. 95b). Published records: PK, PVS, PVV, ROP, RPM, RPP, RRW, SBW (Joakimov 1909, Głowacka and Harizanov 1983, Głowacka 1989, Percy and Cronk 2020, Pramatarova et al. 2023). Material examined: BN, PKG, PKZ, PSI, PSP, PT, PVV, ROM, ROP, RPM, RPR, RRE, RRW, SBW.

Bactericera bohemica (Šulc, 1913)

Diagnosis: 

Adult and fifth-instar immature. Conci and Tamanini (1985c), Ossiannilsson (1992).

Feeds on: 

Geum montanum L. (Głowacka 1989), which is one of the confirmed host plants (Ossiannilsson 1992).

Distribution: 

General distribution. Northern Europe, mountains in central and south-eastern Europe, Caucasus, southern Siberia and Mongolia (Gegechkori and Loginova 1990). Distribution in Bulgaria (Fig. 96). Published records: RPP (Głowacka 1989), without locality data (Burckhardt and Lauterer 1997b). Material examined: RPP, RPR.

Figure 96.  

Distribution of Bactericera bohemica (Šulc, 1913) in Bulgaria.

Bactericera curvatinervis (Foerster, 1848)

Diagnosis: 

Adult and fifth-instar immature. Ossiannilsson (1992), Burckhardt and Lauterer (1997b).

Feeds on: 

Reported from Salix spp. in Bulgaria (Głowacka and Harizanov 1983, Głowacka 1989). Oligophagous on several Salix spp. (Ossiannilsson 1992, Burckhardt and Lauterer 1997b, Percy and Cronk 2020).

Distribution: 

General distribution. Palaearctic. Distribution in Bulgaria (Fig. 97). Published records: RPP, RRW (Głowacka and Harizanov 1983, Głowacka 1989). Material examined: PVV, RPP, RPR.

Figure 97.  

Distribution of Bactericera curvatinervis (Foerster, 1848) in Bulgaria.

Bactericera femoralis (Foerster, 1848)

Diagnosis: 

Adult (Fig. 98a) and fifth-instar immature. Ossiannilsson (1992).

Figure 98.

Bactericera femoralis (Foerster, 1848).

aBactericera femoralis, adult female;  
bDistribution of Bactericera femoralis in Bulgaria.  
Feeds on: 

Oligophagous on Alchemilla spp. (Ossiannilsson 1992, Burckhardt and Lauterer 1997b), on which we also collected adults in Bulgaria.

Distribution: 

General distribution. Palaearctic. Distribution in Bulgaria (Fig. 98b). Published records: PVV (Klimaszewski 1965). Material examined: RPP, RPR, SBM.

Bactericera harrisoni (Wagner, 1955)

Diagnosis: 

Adult. Conci and Tamanini (1985c).

Distribution: 

General distribution. Mountains in central and south-eastern Europe (Austria, Czechia, Italy, Romania, Slovakia, Slovenia, Switzerland). Distribution in Bulgaria (Fig. 99). Material examined: RPP.

Figure 99.  

Distribution of Bactericera harrisoni (Wagner, 1955) in Bulgaria.

Notes: 

New record for Bulgaria. The record of the similar and closely-related B. reuteri (Šulc, 1913) from the Western Rhodopes (RRW) published by Głowacka and Harizanov (1983) could indeed concern B. harrisoni (see the comment under Doubtful records below).

Bactericera lyrata Seljak, Malenovský & Lauterer, 2008

Diagnosis: 

Adult (Fig. 100a). Seljak et al. (2008). Fifth-instar immature. Seljak and Malenovský (2014).

Figure 100.

Bactericera lyrata Seljak, Malenovský & Lauterer, 2008.

aBactericera lyrata, adult male;  
bDistribution of Bactericera lyrata in Bulgaria.  
Distribution: 

General distribution. Central and south-eastern Europe (Czechia, Hungary, Slovenia). Distribution in Bulgaria (Fig. 100b). Material examined: PSI, ROP, SBW.

Notes: 

New record for Bulgaria. The record of the similar and closely related B. reuteri (Šulc, 1913) from the Western Rhodopes (RRW) published by Głowacka and Harizanov (1983) could indeed concern B. lyrata or B. harrisoni (see the comment under 'Doubtful records' below).

Bactericera modesta (Foerster, 1848)

Diagnosis: 

Adult (Fig. 101a) Burckhardt and Lauterer (1997b), Seljak et al. (2008). Fifth-instar immature. Burckhardt and Lauterer (1997b).

Figure 101.

Bactericera modesta (Foerster, 1848).

aBactericera modesta, adult female;  
bDistribution of Bactericera modesta in Bulgaria.  
Feeds on: 

In Bulgaria, we collected adults on Sanguisorba minor Scop., which is one of the confirmed host plants (Burckhardt and Lauterer 1997b).

Distribution: 

General distribution. South-western, central and south-eastern Europe, Central Asia and Mongolia. Distribution in Bulgaria (Fig. 101b). Published records: Bulgaria, without locality data (Burckhardt and Lauterer 1997b), PSA (Pramatarova et al. 2021), RRW (Głowacka and Harizanov 1983). Material examined: BS, PBS, PSA, PT, ROP, RPS, RRE.

Bactericera nigricornis (Foerster, 1848)

Diagnosis: 

Adult (Fig. 102a) and fifth-instar immature. Ossiannilsson (1992), Burckhardt and Freuler (2000).

Figure 102.

Bactericera nigricornis (Foerster, 1848).

aBactericera nigricornis, adult female;  
bDistribution of Bactericera nigricornis in Bulgaria.  
Feeds on: 

Polyphagous (Ossiannilsson 1992). In Bulgaria, reported from Allium cepa L. (Konov 1961), Brassica oleracea L., Daucus carota L. (Harizanov and Lauterer 1968) and Solanum tuberosum L. (Harizanov 1970).

Distribution: 

General distribution. Palaearctic. Distribution in Bulgaria (Fig. 102b). Published records: DEP, DW, PT, RPP, RRW (Konov 1961, Harizanov and Lauterer 1968, Głowacka and Harizanov 1983, Głowacka 1989). Material examined: ROP, ROV, RPP, RPR.

Notes: 

The report by Konov (1961) on B. nigricornis from Allium cepa could concern the similar Bactericera tremblayi (Wagner, 1961), which is known from onion and leek crops in neighbouring countries (Serbia, Greece and Turkey: Jerinić-Prodanović (2010), Ouvrard and Burckhardt (2012)), but has not been documented from Bulgaria.

Bactericera perrisii Puton, 1876

Diagnosis: 

Adult (Fig. 103a) and fifth-instar immature. Burckhardt and Lauterer (1997b).

Figure 103.

Bactericera perrisii Puton, 1876.

aBactericera perrisii, adult female;  
bDistribution of Bactericera perrisii in Bulgaria.  
Feeds on: 

In Bulgaria, we collected adults on Artemisia campestris L., which is a confirmed host plant (Lauterer 1982, Burckhardt and Lauterer 1997b).

Distribution: 

General distribution. Southern, central and south-eastern Europe, Caucasus, Middle East, Central Asia, southern Siberia, Mongolia. Distribution in Bulgaria (Fig. 103b). Published records: ROP (Głowacka 1989). Material examined: BN, ROM, ROP, ROV.

Bactericera striola (Flor, 1861)

Diagnosis: 

Adult (Fig. 104a) and fifth-instar immature. Ossiannilsson (1992).

Figure 104.

Bactericera striola (Flor, 1861).

aBactericera striola, adult female;  
bDistribution of Bactericera striola in Bulgaria.  
Feeds on: 

In Bulgaria, collected on Salix sp. (Głowacka and Harizanov 1983). Oligophagous on several Salix spp. (Ossiannilsson 1992, Burckhardt and Lauterer 1997b, Percy and Cronk 2020).

Distribution: 

General distribution. Europe, Caucasus, Central Asia (Gegechkori and Loginova 1990), southern Siberia, Mongolia. Distribution in Bulgaria (Fig. 104b). Published records: PVS, RRW (Joakimov 1909, Głowacka and Harizanov 1983). Material examined: RPP, RPR.

Bactericera trigonica Hodkinson, 1981

Diagnosis: 

Adult (Fig. 105a) and fifth-instar immature. Burckhardt and Freuler (2000).

Figure 105.

Bactericera trigonica Hodkinson, 1981.

aBactericera trigonica, adult female;  
bDistribution of Bactericera trigonica in Bulgaria.  
Distribution: 

General distribution. Southern and Central Europe, North Africa, Middle East. Distribution in Bulgaria (Fig. 105b). Material examined: BN, ROP

Notes: 

New record for Bulgaria.

Genus Dyspersa Klimaszewski, 1968

Dyspersa abdominalis (Flor, 1861)

Diagnosis: 

Adult and fifth-instar immature. Ossiannilsson (1992).

Distribution: 

General distribution. Palaearctic. Distribution in Bulgaria (Fig. 106). Published records: PVV (Pramatarova et al. 2023). Material examined: PVV, RPR, RPS.

Figure 106.  

Distribution of Dyspersa abdominalis (Flor, 1861) in Bulgaria.

Dyspersa cirsii (Löw, 1881)

Diagnosis: 

Adult (Fig. 107a) and fifth-instar immature. Ossiannilsson (1992).

Figure 107.

Dyspersa cirsii (Löw, 1881).

aDyspersa cirsii, adult female;  
bDistribution of Dyspersa cirsii in Bulgaria.  
Feeds on: 

Oligophagous on Cirsium spp. (Ossiannilsson 1992). In Bulgaria, we collected adults on Cirsium appendiculatum Griseb., which is a probable host plant.

Distribution: 

General distribution. Europe. Distribution in Bulgaria (Fig. 107b). Published records: RPP, RRW (Harizanov and Lauterer 1968, Klimaszewski 1970, Głowacka and Harizanov 1983: all as Trioza viridula auct. nec Zetterstedt, 1828; Głowacka (1989)). Material examined: PKQ, ROV, RPP, RPR.

Dyspersa kantshavelii (Gegechkori, 1977)

Diagnosis: 

Adult (Fig. 108a, b, c, d, e). We provide here photos and drawings of the diagnostic characters, based on specimens collected in Bulgaria. The specimens correspond well with the original description (Gegechkori 1977). Dyspersa kantshavelii resembles D. agrophila (Löw, 1888), D. cirsii, D. flixiana (Burckhardt & Lauterer, 2002) and D. viridula (Zetterstedt, 1828) in the size, colouration, genal processes, forewing venation and general structure of the male and female terminalia, but differs from them in the shape of the paramere (its posterior margin is almost evenly convex and the anterior margin is more shallowly incised subapically in lateral view and the apical process is shorter than in all other species), the distal segment of the aedeagus (its apical dilation is subglobular and bearing a small tooth and incision anteriorly/ventrally in lateral view, whereas this tooth and incision is larger in the other species) and the female terminalia (the apical processes of the proctiger and the subgenital plate is similar to D. viridula, but slightly shorter than in D. agrophila and longer than in D. cirsii and D. flixiana) (Fig. 108e, see also Ossiannilsson (1992), Burckhardt and Lauterer (2002b)).

Figure 108.

Dyspersa kantshavelii (Gegechkori, 1977).

aDyspersa kantshavelii, adult female;  
bDyspersa kantshavelii, head, oblique frontal view;  
cDyspersa kantshavelii, forewing;  
dDyspersa kantshavelii, female terminalia, lateral view;  
eComparison between male and female terminalia of Dyspersa kantshavelii (specimen from Bulgaria) and D. agrophila (Löw, 1888) (specimen from the Czechia). D. kantshavelii, a – male terminalia, lateral view; b – distal segment of aedeagus, lateral view; c – paramere, inner surface, lateral view; d – paramere, posterior view; e – paramere, dorsal view; f – female terminalia, lateral view; D. agrophila, g – male terminalia, lateral view; h – distal segment of aedeagus, lateral view; i – paramere, inner surface, lateral view; j – paramere, posterior view; k – female terminalia, lateral view. Scale bars: 0.1 mm;  
fDistribution of Dyspersa kantshavelii in Bulgaria.  
Feeds on: 

The host plant of D. kantshavelii is unknown. Based on its morphology, it belongs to a complex of species that are associated with thistles (Cirsium spp.) (Ossiannilsson 1972, Burckhardt and Lauterer 2002b).

Distribution: 

General distribution. Caucasus (Armenia, Azerbaijan, Georgia), Turkey. Distribution in Bulgaria (Fig. 108f). Material examined: ROP, RPP, RRW.

Notes: 

New record for Bulgaria and Europe. Dyspersa kantshavelii is a little-known species that was previously only known from the mountains of the Caucasus and north-eastern Turkey (Gegechkori 1977, Gegechkori 1984, Burckhardt 1988). In Bulgaria, the species was collected by P. Lauterer in several places in the Pirin mountains , mostly at high altitudes (1600–2500 m a.s.l.); there is also a record from the Western Rhodopi.

Dyspersa mesembrina (Burckhardt, 1986)

Diagnosis: 

Adult and fifth-instar immature. Burckhardt (1986).

Distribution: 

General distribution. Mountains in Central and south-eastern Europe (Switzerland, Italy, Slovakia and Bulgaria). Distribution in Bulgaria (Fig. 109). Published records: SBM (Klimaszewski (1970), as Trioza pallida; Burckhardt 1986).

Figure 109.  

Distribution of Dyspersa mesembrina (Burckhardt, 1986) in Bulgaria.

Notes: 

According to Burckhardt (1986), the specimens recorded by Klimaszewski (1970) from Bulgaria as "Trioza pallida" are T. mesembrina.

Dyspersa munda (Foerster, 1848)

Diagnosis: 

Adult and fifth-instar immature. Ossiannilsson (1992).

Distribution: 

General distribution. Palaearctic. Distribution in Bulgaria (Fig. 110). Published records: RPP (Głowacka 1989). Material examined: PKQ, ROB, RPP, RPR.

Figure 110.  

Distribution of Dyspersa munda (Foerster, 1848) in Bulgaria.

Dyspersa pallida (Haupt, 1935)

Diagnosis: 

Adult and fifth-instar immature. Burckhardt (1986), Ossiannilsson (1992), Burckhardt and Freuler (2000), as Trioza anthrisci Burckhardt, 1986.

Distribution: 

General distribution. Europe, Turkey, Russia (European part, Siberia). Distribution in Bulgaria (Fig. 111). Published records: RRW (Głowacka and Harizanov 1983). Material examined: RPP, RPR.

Figure 111.  

Distribution of Dyspersa pallida (Haupt, 1935) in Bulgaria.

Genus Eryngiofaga Klimaszewski, 1968

Eryngiofaga babugani (Loginova, 1964)

Diagnosis: 

Adult (Fig. 112a). Loginova (1977).

Figure 112.

Eryngiofaga babugani (Loginova, 1964).

aEryngiofaga babugani, adult female;  
bDistribution of Eryngiofaga babugani in Bulgaria.  
Distribution: 

General distribution. South-eastern Europe (Ukraine: Crimea), Caucasus (Russia: Dagestan) (Loginova 1977). The species identity of specimens from China (Li 2011) is doubtful. Distribution in Bulgaria (Fig. 112b). Material examined: BN.

Notes: 

New record for Bulgaria and the Balkan Peninsula. Only a single female was collected by P. Lauterer on 23 July 1987 in a dry grassland vegetation on limestone on the Black Sea coast (10–50 m a.s.l.). This specimen has an ochreous vertex and thorax, extensive dark brown pattern on thorax and almost completely dark brown to black abdomen, legs and antennae (except the antennal segment 3 which is dark yellow), a small body size (total length including forewings folded over the body 2.3 mm), short antennae (0.83 mm), a high ratio of the length of the antennal segments 3 and 4 (4.3), relatively long genal processes (almost as long as the vertex in frontal view), forewing with a quite short and convex vein Rs, clear or only slightly whitish membrane and a small dark spot and a darkened anal vein in the middle of the clavus and a slightly concave female proctiger posterior to the circumanal pore ring. It resembles E. babugani in these characters, but the measurements do not match the description by Loginova (1977) perfectly and more specimens, especially males, are needed to confirm the identification.

Eryngiofaga dlabolai (Vondráček 1957)

Diagnosis: 

Adult (Fig. 113a). Vondráček (1957b), Loginova (1977).

Figure 113.

Eryngiofaga dlabolai (Vondráček 1957).

aEryngiofaga dlabolai, adult female;  
bDistribution of Eryngiofaga dlabolai in Bulgaria.  
Feeds on: 

We collected adults and immatures on Eryngium campestre L., which is a confirmed host plant (Loginova 1977).

Distribution: 

General distribution. Central and south-eastern Europe, Caucasus. Distribution in Bulgaria (Fig. 113b). Published records: PSA, PSP (Joakimov (1909), as "Trioza mesotela"; Pramatarova et al. 2021, Pramatarova et al. 2023). Material examined: BN, BS, DEP, DM, PBC, PBT, PKZ, PSA, PVS, ROM, ROV, RPS, RRE, SBW, SPW.

Notes: 

The record of Eryngiofaga mesomela (Flor, 1861) (cited as 'Trioza mesotela Flor') from Bulgaria by Joakimov (1909) is here attributed to E. dlabolai. On the basis of numerous recently collected material from different regions, E. dlabolai seems to be the only Eryngiofaga species associated with Eryngium in Bulgaria.

Genus Heterotrioza Dobreanu & Manolache, 1960

Heterotrioza chenopodii (Reuter, 1876)

Diagnosis: 

Adult (Fig. 114a, b) and fifth-instar immature. Ossiannilsson (1992).

Figure 114.

Heterotrioza chenopodii (Reuter, 1876).

aHeterotrioza chenopodii, adult male;  
bHeterotrioza chenopodii, adult female;  
cDistribution of Heterotrioza chenopodii in Bulgaria.  
Feeds on: 

Oligophagous on Amaranthaceae (Lauterer 1982, Ossiannilsson 1992). In Bulgaria, adults were collected on Atriplex spp. by Głowacka and Harizanov (1983) and Głowacka (1989), on Chenopodium sp. by Harizanov and Lauterer (1968) and on Chenopodium album L. by the authors.

Distribution: 

General distribution. Palaearctic, India, alien in North and South America and Hawaii. Distribution in Bulgaria (Fig. 114c). Published records: BS, PT, PVV, ROP, RPP, RRW (Klimaszewski (1965), as Trioza obliqua horvathi; Harizanov and Lauterer (1968), as Trioza chenopodii; Głowacka and Harizanov (1983), as Heterotrioza obliqua horvathi; Głowacka (1989), Pramatarova et al. (2023)). Material examined: BS, ROM, ROV, ROB, ROP.

Heterotrioza dichroa (Scott, 1879)

Diagnosis: 

Adult. Loginova (1964), partly as Trioza atriplicina; Lauterer (1965).

Feeds on: In Bulgaria, adults were collected on Atriplex tatarica L., which is a confirmed host plant (Lauterer 1991).

Distribution: 

General distribution. Central and south-eastern Europe, Caucasus, Middle East, Central Asia. Distribution in Bulgaria (Fig. 115). Published records: Bulgaria, without locality data (Lauterer 1991). Material examined: BN, BS.

Figure 115.  

Distribution of Heterotrioza dichroa (Scott, 1879) in Bulgaria.

Notes: 

Lauterer (1991) mentioned only briefly that he collected H. dichroa in Bulgaria on Atripex tatarica. Here, we give more details on his material and confirm the presence of H. dichroa in Bulgaria.

Heterotrioza kochiae (Gegechkori, 1975)

Diagnosis: 

Adult (Fig. 116a, c, d, e). Originally described (as Trioza kochiae) by Gegechkori (1975) from Georgia and later also recorded from other countries of the Caucasus. Gegechkori (1975) considered H. kochiae to be similar and closely related to Trioza eurotiae Loginova, 1960 (now Heterotrioza eurotiae), which occurs sympatrically with H. kochiae in the Caucasus, but has also been recorded from Kazakhstan, Central Asia, Mongolia and Iran (Loginova 1960, Gegechkori and Loginova 1990, Burckhardt and Lauterer 1993). However, Gegechkori (1975) did not give any characters to distinguish the two species and his illustrations are not detailed enough, which makes the identification of H. kochiae difficult. Here, we provide habitus photographs and illustrations of the male and female terminalia of specimens of H. kochiae from Bulgaria, collected from Bassia prostrata on the Black Sea coast in summer (15 July 1973, P. Lauterer leg.) (Fig. 116a, c, d, e), which agree well with the original description, except for a smaller size (forewing length, in mm: 1.38–1.44 in males (n = 3) and 1.46–1.56 in females (n = 3) from Bulgaria, while Gegechkori (1975) reported 1.59–1.67 in males and 1.62–1.70 in females for the type series from Georgia, collected on 1 June). We consider this size difference as intraspecific variation. We compared the Bulgarian specimens of H. kochiae with the original description of H. eurotiae and with material from Kazakhstan, identified as H. eurotiae by Loginova and deposited in the MMBC (1 male, 2 females, Kokterek sands, 10 km Karatal, Zaisan District, 9 July 1962, Eurotia ceratoides, leg. Loginova). On the basis of this comparison, we can confirm that H. kochiae and H. eurotiae are similar in body colouration and the general structure of the head, forewings, female and male terminalia and especially the aedeagus. Heterotrioza kochiae is smaller than H. eurotiae (in the latter species, the forewing length in mm according to Loginova (1960) is 1.80–1.90 in males, 1.95–2.00 in females; 1.78 in the male and 1.88–2.08 in the females from MMBC). Heterotrioza kochiae differs from H. eurotiae mainly by a relatively broader and shorter paramere (in lateral view) with a less pronounced postero-apical tooth (Fig. 116c) and by the female proctiger and subgenital plate, both of which are slightly broader apically (in lateral view) than in H. eurotiae and the female proctiger is also straight dorsally (in females of H. eurotiae, the proctiger is distinctly concave dorsally, Fig. 116d). Both species probably also differ in their host plants: while H. kochiae was only reported from Bassia prostrata, H. eurotiae was described from a number of specimens found on Krasheninnikovia ceratoides (L.) Gueldenst. (= Eurotia ceratoides (L.) C.A. Mey, Amaranthaceae) and most of the later records are also from this plant species (Loginova 1960, Gegechkori and Loginova 1990), with the exception of a record from 'Kochia sp.' (= Bassia sp.) from Mongolia (Loginova 1972) and a record from 'Kochia cana' (= Bassia stellaris (Moq.) Bornm.) from Iran (Burckhardt and Lauterer 1993), which should be re-examined.

Figure 116.

Heterotrioza kochiae (Gegechkori, 1975).

aHeteriotrioza kochiae: a. adult male; b. adult female;  
bDistribution of Heterotrioza kochiae in Bulgaria;  
cComparison between male parameres of a. Heteriotrioza kochiae from Bulgaria and b. Heteriotrioza eurotiae Loginova, 1960 from Kazakhstan;  
dComparison between female terminalia of a. Heteriotrioza kochiae from Bulgaria and b. Heteriotrioza eurotiae Loginova, 1960 from Kazakhstan;  
eMale and female terminalia of Heterotrioza kochiae. a. male terminalia in lateral view; b. paramere in lateral view; c. paramere in posterior view; d. distal segment of aedeagus in lateral view; e. distal segment of aedeagus in ventral view; f. distal segment of aedeagus in dorsal view; g. apices of parameres in dorsal view; h. female terminalia in lateral view; i. female proctiger in dorsal view; j. female subgenital plate in ventral view.  
Feeds on: 

In Bulgaria, adults were collected on Bassia prostrata (L.) Beck (= Kochia prostrata (L.) Schrad., Amaranthaceae), which has been listed as a host plant (Gegechkori 1984, Gegechkori and Loginova 1990).

Distribution: 

General distribution. Bulgaria, Caucasus (Azerbaijan, Armenia, Georgia, Russia: Stavropol Region) (Gegechkori and Loginova 1990). Distribution in Bulgaria (Fig. 116b). Material examined: BN.

Notes: 

New record for Bulgaria and Europe.

Genus Lauritrioza Conci & Tamanini, 1986

Lauritrioza alacris (Flor, 1861)

Diagnosis: 

Adult (Fig. 117a) and fifth instar immature. Conci and Tamanini (1985b), Ossiannilsson (1992).

Figure 117.

Lauritrioza alacris (Flor, 1861).

aLauritrioza alacris, adult male;  
bDistribution of Lauritrioza alacris in Bulgaria.  
Feeds on: 

Laurus nobilis L., the only host plant of L. alacris (Conci and Tamanini 1985b, Bastin et al. 2023), is not native to Bulgaria (POWO 2024), but it is a widespread ornamental plant that has escaped from cultivation and naturalised in south-eastern Bulgaria along the Black Sea coast (Fidan et al. 2019, Vladimirov and Petrova 2023). Our record of adults of L. alacris in south-western Bulgaria comes from a laurel plant cultivated in a private garden.

Distribution: 

General distribution. Native to the Mediterranean parts of southern Europe, North Africa and Middle East; introduced with the host plant to Central and northern Europe, Great Britain, Ireland, Ukraine (Crimea), Caucasus and North and South Americas. Distribution in Bulgaria (Fig. 117b). Material examined: ROM.

Notes: 

New record for Bulgaria.

Genus Phylloplecta Riley, 1884

Phylloplecta trisignata (Löw, 1886)

Diagnosis: 

Adult (Fig. 118a). Conci and Tamanini (1984a). Fifth-instar immature. Conci and Tamanini (1986).

Figure 118.

Phylloplecta trisignata (Löw, 1886).

aPhylloplecta trisignata, adult female;  
bDistribution of Phylloplecta trisignata in Bulgaria.  
Feeds on: 

Reported from Rubus spp. by Głowacka (1989); Rubus spp. are known as host plants (Conci and Tamanini 1984a, Spodek et al. 2017).

Distribution: 

General distribution. Southern Europe, Middle East. Distribution in Bulgaria (Fig. 118b). Published records: PSP, ROP (Joakimov 1909, Głowacka 1989, Pramatarova et al. 2023). Material examined: BN, BS, PSP, PVS.

Genus Spanioza Enderlein, 1926

Spanioza galii (Foerster, 1848)

Diagnosis: 

Adult (Fig. 119a) and fifth-instar immature. Burckhardt and Lauterer (2006).

Figure 119.

Spanioza galii (Foerster, 1848).

aSpanioza galii, adult female;  
bDistribution of Spanioza galii in Bulgaria.  
Distribution: 

General distribution. West Palaearctic, Central Asia (Burckhardt and Lauterer 2006). Distribution in Bulgaria (Fig. 119b). Published records: PT, RRE (Klimaszewski 1965). Material examined: BN, BS, DEL, DEP, DW, PBB, PBT, PKZ, PSP, RRE, RRW, SBM, SBW.

Notes: 

The specimens of 'Trioza galii' published by Klimaszewski (1965) should be revised as they may be S. velutina. The two species were only later distinguished by Burckhardt and Lauterer (2006).

Spanioza velutina (Foerster, 1848)

Diagnosis: 

Adult (Fig. 120a). Burckhardt and Lauterer (2006).

Figure 120.

Spanioza velutina (Foerster, 1848).

aSpanioza velutina, adult male;  
bDistribution of Spanioza velutina in Bulgaria.  
Distribution: 

General distribution. Palaearctic (Burckhardt and Lauterer 2006, Cho et al. 2022). Distribution in Bulgaria (Fig. 120b). Material examined: BN, BS, DEL, DEP, DW, PBS, PBT, RPR, RRE, RRW, SBE, SBW.

Notes: 

New record for Bulgaria.

Genus Trichochermes Kirkaldy, 1904

Trichochermes rhamni (Schrank, 1801)

Diagnosis: 

Adult (Fig. 121a) and fifth-instar immature. Ossiannilsson (1992).

Figure 121.

Trichochermes rhamni (Schrank, 1801).

aTrichochermes rhamni, adult male;  
bDistribution of Trichochermes rhamni in Bulgaria.  
Distribution: 

General distribution. Europe, Caucasus, Central Asia (Gegechkori and Loginova 1990). Distribution in Bulgaria (Fig. 121b). Material examined: SBW.

Notes: 

New record for Bulgaria.

Trichochermes walkeri (Foerster, 1848)

Diagnosis: 

Adult and fifth-instar immature. Ossiannilsson (1992).

Feeds on: 

In Bulgaria, adults were collected on Rhamnus cathartica L. (Kuznetsova et al. 1995, Labina et al. 2014), which is a confirmed host plant (Ossiannilsson 1992).

Distribution: 

General distribution. Europe, Caucasus, Central Asia (Gegechkori and Loginova 1990). Distribution in Bulgaria (Fig. 122). Published records: ROP (Labina et al. 2014).

Figure 122.  

Distribution of Trichochermes walkeri (Foerster, 1848) in Bulgaria.

Genus Trioza Foerster, 1848

Trioza cerastii (Linnaeus, 1758)

Diagnosis: 

Adult and fifth-instar immature. Ossiannilsson (1992).

Distribution: 

General distribution. Europe. Distribution in Bulgaria (Fig. 123). Published records: RRW (Głowacka and Harizanov 1983). Material examined: RPP, RPR, SBW.

Figure 123.  

Distribution of Trioza cerastii (Linnaeus, 1758) in Bulgaria.

Trioza flavipennis Foerster, 1848

Diagnosis: 

Adult and fifth-instar immature. Ossiannilsson (1992).

Distribution: 

General distribution. Europe. Distribution in Bulgaria (Fig. 124). Material examined: RPR, RRW, ROP.

Figure 124.  

Distribution of Trioza flavipennis Foerster, 1848 in Bulgaria.

Notes: 

New record for Bulgaria.

Trioza megacerca Burckhardt, 1983

Diagnosis: 

Adult. Burckhardt (1983).

Distribution: 

General distribution. Southern parts of Central Europe and the Balkans. Distribution in Bulgaria (Fig. 125). Published records: ROP (Lauterer and Malenovský 2002). Material examined: RPR, ROP.

Figure 125.  

Distribution of Trioza megacerca Burckhardt, 1983 in Bulgaria.

Trioza neglecta Loginova, 1978

Diagnosis: 

Adult (Fig. 126a). Dobreanu and Manolache (1962), as Trioza elaeagni; Loginova (1978).

Figure 126.

Trioza neglecta (Loginova, 1978).

aTrioza neglecta, adult female;  
bDistribution of Trioza neglecta in Bulgaria.  
Feeds on: 

We collected adults and immatures on Elaeagnus angustifolia L., which is a confirmed host plant of T. neglecta (Loginova 1978, Lauterer and Janíček 1990). Elaeagnus angustifolia is not native to the Bulgarian flora. It is planted intentionally as an ornamental plant, to stabilise dry and eroded areas and in shelter belts. It has naturalised and become invasive in many regions of Bulgaria (Petrova et al. 2013).

Distribution: 

General distribution. Native to eastern parts of south-eastern Europe, Middle East and Caucasus, alien in Central Europe and the Balkans. Distribution in Bulgaria (Fig. 126b). Published records: SPE (Lauterer and Janíček 1990). Material examined: PVS, SPE.

Notes: 

Trioza neglecta is an alien species in the Bulgarian fauna. The first record from Bulgaria dates back to 1987 from the vicinity of a road between Antonovo and Kesarevo in the north-central part of the country (Lauterer and Janíček 1990).

Trioza proxima Flor, 1861

Diagnosis: 

Adult (Fig. 127a). Burckhardt (1983).

Figure 127.

Trioza proxima Flor, 1861.

aTrioza proxima. adult female;  
bDistribution of Trioza proxima Flor, 1861 in Bulgaria.  
Distribution: 

General distribution. Europe, Caucasus (Gegechkori and Loginova 1990). Distribution in Bulgaria (Fig. 127b). Published records: RPM, RPP, RRW (Klimaszewski 1970, Głowacka 1989). Material examined: BS, PSI, ROP, RRE.

Trioza remota Foerster, 1848

Diagnosis: 

Adult and fifth-instar immature. Ossiannilsson (1992).

Feeds on: 

We collected adults on Quercus sp. in Bulgaria. The confirmed host plants from other countries are Qu. petraea (Matt.) Liebl., Qu. pubescens Willd. and Qu. robur L. (Ossiannilsson 1992, Seljak 2020).

Distribution: 

General distribution. Europe, North Africa, Caucasus, Middle East. Distribution in Bulgaria (Fig. 128). Published records: RRW (Klimaszewski 1965). Material examined: BS, PBS, PKZ, PSP, PT, ROP, RRE, RRW.

Figure 128.  

Distribution of Trioza remota Foerster, 1848 in Bulgaria.

Trioza rotundata Flor, 1861

Diagnosis: 

Adult and fifth-instar immature. Burckhardt and Lauterer (2002a).

Feeds on: 

Found on Cardamine amara L. in Bulgaria, which is a confirmed host plant (Burckhardt and Lauterer 2002a).

Distribution: 

General distribution. Europe, Caucasus. Distribution in Bulgaria (Fig. 129). Published records: RPP, RRW, SBW (Harizanov and Lauterer 1968, Głowacka and Harizanov 1983, Głowacka 1989, Burckhardt and Lauterer 2002a, Pramatarova et al. 2021). Material examined: RPP, RPR, RRW, SBM, SBW.

Figure 129.  

Distribution of Trioza rotundata Flor, 1861 in Bulgaria.

Trioza rumicis Löw, 1880

Diagnosis: 

Adult. Dobreanu and Manolache (1962).

Feeds on: 

Collected on Rumex sp. in Bulgaria (Głowacka and Harizanov 1983). Oligophagous and inducing galls on several Rumex spp. (Conci et al. 1996).

Distribution: 

General distribution. Central and south-eastern Europe, Caucasus, Iran (Gegechkori and Loginova 1990, Burckhardt and Lauterer 1993). Distribution in Bulgaria (Fig. 130). Published records: RRW (Głowacka and Harizanov 1983). Material examined: RPR, RPP.

Figure 130.  

Distribution of Trioza rumicis Löw, 1880 in Bulgaria.

Trioza urticae (Linnaeus, 1758)

Diagnosis: 

Adult (Fig. 131a) and fifth-instar immature. Ossiannilsson (1992).

Figure 131.

Trioza urticae (Linnaeus, 1758).

aTrioza urticae, adult female;  
bDistribution of Trioza urticae in Bulgaria.  
Feeds on: 

In Bulgaria, collected on Urtica dioica L. (Głowacka and Harizanov 1983, Wonglersak et al. 2017), which is well known as a host plant (Ossiannilsson 1992).

Distribution: 

General distribution. Palaearctic. Distribution in Bulgaria (Fig. 131b). Published records: BS, PVV, ROP, RPP, RRW, SBW (Klimaszewski 1965, Głowacka and Harizanov 1983, Głowacka 1989, Wonglersak et al. 2017, Pramatarova et al. 2023). Material еxamined: BN, DEP, PBS, PKZ, PSI, PT, PVV, ROB, ROO, ROP, ROV, RPM, RPP, RPR, RPS, RRE, RRW, SBE, SBM, SBW, SPW.

Doubtful records

Aphalara sauteri Burckhardt, 1983

Notes: 

The records of A. sauteri Burckhardt, 1983 published from the Pirin Mountains by Głowacka (1989) are attributed here to A. nigrimaculosa, based on the material collected in the same area and examined by the authors. Both A. nigrimaculosa and A. sauteri are similar in morphology and it is likely that Głowacka's material was misidentified. Aphalara sauteri is distributed in the Alps, Slovakia and Spain and its presence in Bulgaria is doubtful (Burckhardt and Lauterer 1997a).

Bactericera acutipennis (Zetterstedt, 1828)

Notes: 

Bactericera acutipennis was recorded from Bulgaria (Rila Mountains) by Joakimov (1909) (as Trioza acutipennis). According to Klimaszewski (1965), this record probably refers to Bactericera femoralis, for which the name Trioza acutipennis auct. nec Zetterstedt was erroneously and quite frequently used in literature (Ossiannilsson 1992, Burckhardt and Lauterer 1997b). We agree with Klimaszewski's opinion. The presence of B. acutipennis in Bulgaria cannot be excluded, as its host plant, Comarum palustre L., occurs in the country, but further confirmation of B. acutipennis in Bulgaria is needed.

Bactericera reuteri (Šulc, 1913)

Notes: 

Further confirmation is also needed for B. reuteri, which was recorded by Głowacka and Harizanov (1983) from conifers at high altitudes in the Rhodope Mountains. It is likely that this record concerns the closely-related, similar and recently-described B. lyrata (Seljak et al. 2008, Seljak and Malenovský 2014) or B. harrisoni, which was erroneously described and illustrated as 'Trioza reuteri' by Dobreanu and Manolache (1962) (see Conci and Tamanini (1985c)). The latter two species are confirmed in this paper on the basis of recently-collected material from Bulgaria. Bactericera reuteri is distributed in central and northern Europe, Russia and Mongolia and is monophagous on Potentilla anserina L. (Seljak et al. 2008). Potentilla anserina occurs in Bulgaria, but is restricted to the Danube Plain, with a maximum altitude of 300 m a.s.l. (Assyov et al. 2012), which makes the occurrence of B. reuteri at high altitude of the Rhodope Mountains unlikely.

Dyspersa apicalis (Foerster, 1848)

Notes: 

The record of 'Trioza apicalis' by Klimaszewski (1965) from Bulgaria (RRW) is doubtful according to Burckhardt (1986) as it could concern any species of the Dyspersa apicalis complex.

Dyspersa viridula (Zetterstedt, 1828)

Notes: 

The name 'Trioza viridula' was often misinterpreted in the past (Ossiannilsson 1972, Burckhardt 1986). The record of 'Trioza viridula' by Joakimov (1909) from Bulgaria (PVV) could, according to Burckhardt (1986), concern any species of the Dyspersa apicalis complex. The records of 'Trioza viridula' by Harizanov and Lauterer (1968), Klimaszewski (1970) and Głowacka and Harizanov (1983) are attributed here to Dyspersa cirsii.

Eryngiofaga mesomela (Flor, 1861)

Notes: 

Eryngiofaga mesomela was reported from Bulgaria by Joakimov (1909). However, this report probably refers to E. dlabolai (Vondráček, 1957), which was only later distinguished from E. mesomela (Pramatarova et al. 2021, Pramatarova et al. 2023). This is also supported by the lack of additional material of E. mesomela from Bulgaria, in contrast to numerous material of E. dlabolai (see above).

Trioza dispar Löw, 1878

Notes: 

Together with T. foersteri Meyer-Dür, 1871, T. megacerca, T. proxima and T. tatrensis Klimaszewski, 1965, T. dispar forms a group of morphologically and biologically similar species and the records of T. dispar published before the revision of the group by Burckhardt (1983) should be re-examined (see also Lauterer and Malenovský (2002)). This also applies to the only record of T. dispar from Bulgaria (Rila Mts.) by Joakimov (1909), as it could be, for example, T. megacerca or T. proxima, which have been confirmed more recently from this country. As the specimens were not available for revision (Pramatarova et al. 2023), we consider the occurrence of T. dispar in Bulgaria to be doubtful.

Discussion

Nomenclatural acts

The following new synonymy is proposed here:

Colposcenia osmanica Vondráček, 1953: 440 = Colposcenia kiritshenkoi Loginova, 1960: 67, syn. nov.

Colposcenia osmanica was described by Vondráček (1953) on the basis of a large series of specimens collected in Turkey ('Ankara-Baraj, Anatolie, 3-4 July 1947, Feke, Toros, Anatolia, 12 August 1947, for many specimens of both sexes. Holotype and paratypes in the collections of National museum in Praha and those of author'). In the National Museum of Czechia in Prague (NMPC), we found 111 male and 85 female specimens, the labelling of which exactly corresponds with the published data on place and date of collection. All these specimens are dry-mounted (glued on pointed cardboard labels), but none of them was originally associated with an identification or type label, i.e. no holotype was actually fixed from the type series and labelled as such. There was only a label "Colposcenia osmanica Vond." pinned to the top of the box in which these specimens were kept. Due to the lack of labelling, the specimens were previously overlooked and omitted from the catalogue of the type specimens of Sternorrhyncha in the NMPC (Malenovský et al. 2016), but we have no doubt that they are part of the original type series of C. osmanica. The personal collection of Karel Vondráček in the Psylloidea collection in the Moravian Museum in Brno includes 10 microscopic slides with seven males, eight females and parts of other specimens of C. osmanica from 'Ankara - Baraj, 3-4.7.1947, Hoberlandt'; all slides were labelled as syntypes. In accordance with Article 74 of the ICZN (1999), we designate here a lectotype for C. osmanica in order to stabilise the nomenclature. The lectotype is a dry-mounted male deposited in the NMPC and labelled as follows: 'Ankara - Baraj, Anat. 3-4. VII 47, Exp. N Mus ČSR' and 'LECTOTYPUS, Colposcenia osmanica Vondráček, 1953, design. by I. Malenovský in Pramatarova et al. (2025)'. Six dry-mounted paralectotypes (3 males, 3 females) with the same locality data are newly deposited in MMBC, the rest of the dry-mounted paralectotypes are kept in NMPC.

Colposcenia kiritshenkoi was described by Loginova (1960), based on specimens from Nakchivan in Azerbaijan. Although Loginova (1960) cited the work of Vondráček (1953), in the original description, she did not give any characters that distinguish C. kiritshenkoi from C. osmanica. In our opinion, the illustrations of the head, forewing and especially the male and female terminalia of C. osmanica by Vondráček (1953) and of C. kiritshenkoi by Loginova (1960) do not differ in any important details and show the same species. Loginova (1974b) later considered C. osmanica and C. kiritshenkoi as two valid species which she distinguished in her identification key of Palaearctic Colposcenia spp. mainly by the colouration of the body (green-yellow to yellow in C. osmanica vs. variegated, yellow-orange-crimson, with white spots on head and thorax in C. kiritshenkoi) and less clearly also by the forewing pattern (consisting of more or less well defined brownish spots on a yellowish background in C. osmanica vs. consisting of three brown stripes and spots in C. kiritshenkoi). Although Loginova (1974b) correctly stated that all Colposcenia species show a seasonal variation in colouration and indicated in the key that the above-mentioned differences in colouration between C. osmanica and C. kiritshenkoi should be compared in 'summer' specimens, she probably did not take into account that the type series of C. osmanica was collected in July and August, while the type specimens of C. kiritshenkoi were collected in April and, thus, could be different seasonal forms of the same species.

Both C. osmanica and C. kiritschenkoi have been reported from Bulgaria (Klimaszewski 1963, Klimaszewski 1965, Gegechkori and Loginova 1990). Many specimens of the two colour forms corresponding to C. osmanica (collected from late June to October) and C. kiritshenkoi (collected in April and May) were also examined by us from the collections of BFUS and MMBC. The two forms are sympatric in Bulgaria and we could not detect any differences in the morphology of the male and female terminalia (Fig. 12c). We also compared these specimens from Bulgaria with the type series of C. osmanica from Turkey (see above) and a specimen originally identified as C. kiritshenkoi by M. M. Loginova (deposited in the MMBC). We conclude that all these specimens are conspecific and propose to formally synonymise C. kiritshenkoi under C. osmanica. The synonymy of the two forms should be further supported by molecular data in the future. Pramatarova et al. (2024) published the partial sequences of COI and cytb gene fragments from specimens of both forms of C. osmanica collected in Bulgaria, but each of their sequences was unfortunately extracted from different specimens (COI - C. kiritshenkoi, cytb - C. osmanica s.str.) and the data cannot be directly compared between the two seasonal forms at the moment.

According to Spodek et al. (2017), further studies are needed to determine whether C. kiritshenkoi (and thus C. osmanica) is conspecific with Colposcenia lurida (Scott, 1880). The identity of C. lurida is poorly known - it was described on the basis of a single male from the Caucasus (Scott 1880) and has never been re-described or illustrated. Recently, C. lurida was reported from Israel (Spodek et al. 2017).

Diversity, distribution and host associations of Psylloidea in Bulgaria

Prior to this work, 113 species of psyllids have been recorded from Bulgaria in 51 publications. We consider the records of seven species (Aphalara sauteri, Bactericera acutipennis, B. reuteri, Dyspersa apicalis, D. viridula, Eryngiofaga mesomela and Trioza dispar) as doubtful because they may have been misidentified. The published records from Bulgaria (Joakimov 1909, Klimaszewski 1965, Głowacka and Harizanov 1983, Głowacka 1989) precede taxonomic revisions in which relevant diagnostic characters for distinguishing closely-related and similar species were presented and we could not confirm the occurrence of these particular species in Bulgaria from the material we collected or examined. It is likely that some of these records were misidentified because similar, allopatric species are confirmed here from Bulgaria (Aphalara nigrimaculosa, Eryngiofaga dlabolai) or the species names are known to have been frequently misinterpreted in the past (B. acutipennis, D. viridula). On the other hand, B. acutipennis, B. reuteri, D. apicalis and T. dispar (in their current taxonomic interpretations) are widely distributed in Europe (Burckhardt 1983, Burckhardt 1986, Ossiannilsson 1992, Seljak et al. 2008) and their host plants occur in Bulgaria (POWO 2024), so the occurrence of these psyllid species in the country is possible, but awaits proper documentation. Arytaina genistae, Craspedolepta latior, Cacopsylla nigrita, Dyspersa mesembrina and Trichochermes walkeri are also known from Bulgaria only from previous publications (Klimaszewski 1965, Głowacka and Harizanov 1983, Burckhardt 1986, Labina et al. 2014) and are missing in the collections that were accessible to us. Although a revision of the relevant material and confirmation of these species by newly-collected material in the field would be desirable, we consider these data to be trustworthy. For 105 species previously published from Bulgaria, we were able to confirm their occurrence in the country on the basis of material that we personally examined. One species name, Colposcenia kiritshenkoi, is newly synonymised and 25 species are recorded here for the first time from Bulgaria.

To summarise, a total of 130 species of jumping plant lice have been identified in Bulgaria to date. They belong to six families and 33 genera: Aphalaridae (8 genera, 31 species), Calophyidae (1 genus, 1 species), Carsidaridae (1 genus, 1 species), Liviidae (6 genera, 15 species), Psyllidae (8 genera, 45 species) and Triozidae (9 genera, 37 species). Compared to the numbers of psyllid species known from neighbouring countries and other countries of the Balkan Peninsula from where comprehensive faunistic data are available (Greece: 89 spp., Burckhardt (1987); Romania: 86 spp., Dobreanu and Manolache (1962); Serbia: 63 spp., Jerinić-Prodanović (2010); Turkey: 101 spp., Drohojowska and Burckhardt (2014); Croatia: 86 spp., Pintar (2023); Slovenia: 126 spp., Seljak (2020); see also Ouvrard (2020) and Suppl. material 1), the diversity of jumping plant lice in Bulgaria seems to be relatively high, although most of these countries have not been studied with the same intensity and, with the exception of Slovenia, a significantly higher number of species can be expected in them given their size and the diversity of natural conditions. To a certain extent, this also applies to Bulgaria, as 72 other species are known from at least one of the neighbouring countries (Greece, North Macedonia, Romania, Serbia or Turkey), but have not yet been found in Bulgaria (Suppl. material 1). Although our list is quite comprehensive, we expect that new taxa will be identified in the Bulgarian psyllid fauna in the future.

From a biogeographical point of view, the currently known psyllid fauna of Bulgaria is mainly composed of species that are widely distributed in the Palaearctic (36 spp.), the Western Palaearctic (22 spp.) or in Europe (10 spp.), some even having a Holarctic distribution (5 spp.).

On the other hand, many species have a more restricted distributional pattern. Some of them represent Mediterranean, sub-Mediterranean or Ponto-Mediterranean elements and they reach the northern limits of their general distribution (or at least their distribution in eastern Europe) in southern or central Bulgaria or on the Bulgarian Black Sea coast, often together with their host plants, such as Agonoscena pistaciae, A. targionii, Megagonoscena gallicola and M. viridis on Pistacia terebinthus, Colposcenia aliena and C. traciana on Tamarix spp., Euphyllura phillyreae on Phillyrea latifolia, Strophingia cinereae on Erica arborea, Cacopsylla notata on Pyrus spinosa and Psylla colorata on Ostrya carpinifolia or they seem to be limited by the climate, as their host plants are more widespread, such as Aphorma lichenoides on Ranunculus bulbosus, Camarotoscena subrubescens on Populus spp., Livia mediterranea on Carex humilis and C. pontica, Bactericera trigonica on Apiaceae and Phylloplecta trisignata on Rubus spp. (Spodek et al. 2017, Burckhardt et al. 2023).

Homotoma ficus, Diaphorina lycii, Spanioneura buxi, S. fonscolombii and Lauritrioza alacris are also widespread in the Mediterranean Region (and in the Caucasus and/or the Middle East, D. lycii also in Central Asia), but their host plants are not indigenous, i.e. they were introduced to Bulgaria and none of these psyllid species can be considered autochthonous in the Bulgarian fauna, although they reproduce outdoors in Bulgaria and some have even been found in natural habitats (H. ficus, D. lycii). The status of Cacopsylla pulchella is unclear, as its host plant, Cercis siliquastrum, is native to eastern Bulgaria (Assyov et al. 2012), but we only detected the psyllids on cultivated ornamental trees in an urban environment. Calophya rhois, associated with Cotinus coggygria, is another psyllid species widely distributed in the Mediterranean, Middle East and Asia, relatively common in parks and gardens or along roads. While C. rhois is alien in several European countries (Burckhardt and Mühlethaler 2003, Mifsud et al. 2010), its host plant is hypothesised to be native to Bulgaria (Assyov et al. 2012, POWO 2024). In this case too, its status in Bulgaria should be confirmed by fieldwork in natural habitats. In addition to these species, Livilla variegata (native to southern Europe and the Alps), Trioza neglecta (native to eastern parts of south-eastern Europe, the Middle East and the Caucasus) and Acizzia jamatonica (native to eastern Asia) have clearly been unintentionally introduced to Bulgaria with their host plants, which are used as ornamentals or for erosion control, but in the first two cases, naturalised and are invasive (Petrova et al. 2013). In total, therefore, at least eight species (6% of the Bulgarian psyllid fauna) can be regarded as alien (non-native, adventive) and naturalised in Bulgaria to date.

Several species reach the westernmost limits of their known natural distribution in Bulgaria. These species are either mainly distributed in the steppe vegetation of southern Ukraine, Russia and Central Asia and/or semi-arid regions of the Middle East and the northern Caucasus, such as Colposcenia osmanica, Craspedolepta araneosa, Psyllopsis machinosa, Eryngiofaga babugani and Heterotrioza kochiae (Gegechkori 1984, Gegechkori and Loginova 1990) or in the mountains of north-eastern Turkey and/or the Caucasus, such as Aphalara nigrimaculosa, Colposcenia bidentata and Dyspersa kantshavelii (Gegechkori 1984, Burckhardt 1988, Burckhardt and Lauterer 1997a).

Other "steppic" elements, mainly associated with open dry grasslands or saline habitats, extend from Central Asia, the Middle East or the Caucasus across the Balkans and reach their western distribution limit in central or south-western Europe: Craspedolepta artemisiae, C. bulgarica, C. innoxia, C. pontica, Eumetoecus kochiae, Rhodochlanis bicolor, Bactericera perrisii, Heterotrioza dichroa and Eryngiofaga dlabolai (Lauterer 1965, Loginova 1977, Conci et al. 1993, Lauterer and Malenovský 2002, Seljak 2020).

Another group of species is known to be restricted to south-eastern and central Europe - it includes species associated with open thermophilous woodlands and dry grasslands (Psyllopsis meliphila, Arytaina maculata, Arytainilla spartiicola, Livilla cognata, L. horvathi, L. radiata and Trioza megacerca) and ruderal habitats (Craspedolepta conspersa, Bactericera lyrata) (Conci and Tamanini 1983, Conci and Tamanini 1985a, Hodkinson and Hollis 1987, Conci and Tamanini 1990, Lauterer and Malenovský 2002, Malenovský et al. 2011, Seljak and Malenovský 2014). Psyllopsis dobreanuae, which was newly reported here for Bulgaria, was previously only known from eastern Romania, North Macedonia and Moldova (Loginova 1971, Malenovský and Jerinić-Prodanović 2011).

A large part of Bulgaria is covered by mountains and a significant part of the country's biodiversity is associated with montane and alpine habitats. A relatively large number of psyllid species in Bulgaria are also restricted to the mountains. These include: i) species with predominantly boreal distribution in the northern parts of Eurasia and rather isolated occurrences in the mountains or highlands of central and south-eastern Europe, such as Aphalara affinis, Craspedolepta nebulosa, C. subpunctata, Cacopsylla corcontum, C. myrtilli, C. sorbi, Bactericera bohemica, B. femoralis, Dyspersa abdominalis, D. cirsii, D. munda, D. pallida, Trioza cerastii and T. rotundata (Lauterer 1976, Ossiannilsson 1992, Conci et al. 1993, Conci et al. 1996, Labina et al. 2009, Malenovský et al. 2014); ii) species apparently endemic to the mountains of central and south-eastern Europe (Alps, Carpathians and Balkans), such as Psylla alpina, Bactericera harrisoni and Dyspersa mesembrina (Conci and Tamanini 1985c, Burckhardt 1986, Conci et al. 1993, Conci et al. 1996); iii) species more widely distributed in the Alps, the Carpathians, the Balkans, the Caucasus and the Alborz in northern Iran, such as Trioza rumicis (Conci et al. 1996, Burckhardt and Lauterer 1993) and iv) species restricted to the Balkans, the Pontic Mountains and the Caucasus, such as Aphalara nigrimaculosa and Dyspersa kantshavelii mentioned above. A special area of nature conservation importance in Bulgaria is the Strandzha Mountains in the south-east of the country with its mixed stands of Calluna vulgaris and Erica arborea heaths (Gussev 2015), where only Strophingia ericae and S. cinereae have been recorded.

However, these conclusions should be regarded as provisional as the knowledge of the distribution of many psyllid species is incomplete and the knowledge of the Bulgarian psyllid fauna is also uneven at the regional level. Most of the data come from the south-western part of the country (Fig. 132). This explains why the Krupnik-Sandanski-Petrich Valley has the highest number of 58 recorded species, followed by the Pirin and Rila mountains, with 50 psyllid species each. In contrast, the regions of the Ruy, Verila, Plana, Ograzhden and Sturgach Mountains, Kraishte and Strandzha-Dervent Districts have been neglected and lack data, while the Danubian Plain and south-eastern Bulgaria remain poorly studied.

Figure 132.  

Distribution of collecting sites of psyllids in Bulgaria.

The knowledge of the host plants of the Bulgarian psyllids is also quite limited, as most records lack precise information on the host plants and, when this is present in the collections, it is rarely associated with material of psyllid immatures, so that these plant taxa can be considered as 'confirmed hosts' (Burckhardt et al. 2014). Nevertheless, we provide here new host plant information for ten psyllid species, some of which are also confirmed by the presence of immatures. These records indicate a regional specificity of the psyllid species in Bulgaria, as these species were previously known to be associated with other, albeit closely related, plant taxa in western, central and southern Europe (Colposcenia traciana, Craspedolepta pontica, Arytaina maculata, Arytainilla spartiicola, Cacopsylla bidens, Livilla cognata, L. horvathi, Dyspersa cirsii), Caucasus (Aphalara nigrimaculosa) or Central Asia (Craspedolepta araneosa).

Although there is still clearly much work to be done to fully understand the Bulgarian psyllid fauna, this study serves to illustrate the relatively high species diversity of psyllids in this country, especially due to its particular geographical location and its diverse natural habitats, despite a relatively small area.

Acknowledgements

We dedicate this study to the memory of our late dear friend, colleague and teacher Dr Pavel Lauterer, who in the course of his career laid the foundation for this work through his fruitful collections of psyllids in Bulgaria and his taxonomic studies, for which we are deeply grateful. We also thank Dr Petr Kment for the opportunity to study the material in the National Museum of Czechia in Prague and Ass. prof. Anita Tosheva, Dr Georgi Kunev (both from the Faculty of Biology, Sofia University) and Dr Jiří Danihelka (Faculty of Science, Masaryk University, Brno) for the identification of voucher specimens of the host plants. Last, but not least, we would like to thank PD Dr Daniel Burckhardt (Naturhistorisches Museum, Basel, Switzerland), Dr David Ouvrard (ANSES Laboratoire de la santé des végétaux, Montpellier, France) and Dr hab. Jowita Drohojowska (Institute of Biology, Biotechnology and Environmental Protection, University of Silesia, Poland) for their careful review and valuable suggestions for improving the manuscript.

This study was financially supported by the Scientific Research Fund of Sofia University “St. Kliment Ohridski”, grant number 80-10-5/2024. Monika Pramatarova was supported by the Bulgarian Ministry of Education and Science under the National Research Programme “Young scientists and postdoctoral fellows – 2” approved by DCM 206/07.04.2022. Part of the work was carried out during her stay at the Faculty of Science at Masaryk University in Brno, supported by the Erasmus+ programme of the European Union. Igor Malenovský was partially supported by the grant of the Moravian Museum in Brno from the Ministry of Culture of Czechia under its long-term conceptual development programme for research institutions (ref. MK000094862).

Author contributions

Monika Pramatarova: Investigation, Resources, Data Curation, Visualisation, Writing – Original Draft, Funding Acquisition

Igor Malenovský: Conceptualisation, Investigation, Resources, Visualisation, Writing – Original Draft, Writing – Review and Editing, Supervision

Ilia Gjonov: Conceptualisation, Investigation, Resources, Data Curation, Validation, Writing – Review and Editing, Supervision, Funding Acquisition

References

Supplementary material

Suppl. material 1: Comparison of psyllid diversity in Bulgaria and other Balkan countries and Turkey 
Authors:  Pramatarova M., Malenovský I., Gjonov I.
Data type:  review
login to comment