Biodiversity Data Journal :
Taxonomy & Inventories
|
Corresponding author: Seunghwan Lee (seung@snu.ac.kr)
Academic editor: Colin Favret
Received: 19 Feb 2025 | Accepted: 24 Apr 2025 | Published: 07 May 2025
© 2025 Hwalran Choi, Yeyeun Kim, Seunghwan Lee
This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Citation:
Choi H, Kim Y, Lee S (2025) Unveiling hidden diversity: new records of Chaitophorus (Hemiptera, Aphididae) in Korea from historical specimens. Biodiversity Data Journal 13: e150852. https://doi.org/10.3897/BDJ.13.e150852
|
|
The aphid genus Chaitophorus Koch, 1854 (Hemiptera, Aphididae, Chaitophorinae) has been studied in Korea from historical specimens.
Korean Chaitophorus aphids have been confirmed, including four new records: C. horii Takahashi, 1939; C. leucomelas Koch, 1854; C. salijaponicus Essig and Kuwana, 1918; and C. tremulae Koch, 1854. These four newly-recorded species are described with biometric measurements and illustrations. A modified taxonomic key for Korean Chaitophorus spp. is presented.
aphids, Salicaceae, East Asia
The aphid genus Chaitophorus Koch, 1854 is a species-rich group within the subfamily Chaitophorinae. These aphids are distributed across the Holarctic Region, with approximately 90 species recorded (
Taxonomic studies on Chaitophorus have been conducted in various countries.
Systematic and co-evolutionary studies on the genus Chaitophorus have also been undertaken.
Taxonomic research on Korean Chaitophorus species has been conducted by several researchers, including
Historical specimens of this study are deposited in the Consortium of Korea Biodiversity and Sustainable Use, College for Agriculture and Life Sciences, Seoul National University (CALS SNU, Korea).
Illustrations for each species were taken by digital camera (14.2 Color Mosaic, Diagnostic Instruments, Sterling Heights, MI, USA) attached to the microscope (DM 400B, Leica Microsystems, Wetzlar, Germany) at a resolution of 600 dpi. Measurements for each specimen are taken from the digital images by Image Laboratory v.2.2.4.0 software (MCM Design Ltd, Hillerod, Denmark).
Abbreviations used for descriptions are as follows: ap., apterous viviparous female; Ant., antennae; Ant. I, Ant. II, Ant. III, Ant. IV, Ant. V, Ant. VI and Ant. VIb, antennal segments I, II, III, IV, V, VI and base of VI, respectively; BDAnt. III, basal diameter of antennal segment III; AbdT. III, Abdominal Tergite III; GP, genital plate; 2HT, second segment of hind tarsus; PT, processus terminals of antennal segment VI; SIPH, siphunculus; URS, ultimate rostral segments (segment IV+V). For the localities of distribution, provincial abbreviations are also used: South Korea: CB, Chungcheongbuk-do; GG, Gyeonggi-do; JB, Jeollabuk-do; North Korea: HB, Hwanghaebuk-do; PB, Pyeonganbuk-do; PN: Pyeongannam-do; RG: Ryanggang-do.
Apterous viviparous female (Fig.
Part | Apterous vivipara (n = 5) | ||
Average | (Min-Max) | ||
Length (mm) | Body (from the most forward point of the frons to end of Cauda) | 1.36 | (1.35-1.38) |
Whole Ant. | 0.71 | (0.69-0.72) | |
Ant. I | 0.05 | (0.05-0.05) | |
Ant. II | 0.04 | (0.04-0.04) | |
Ant. III | 0.14 | (0.13-0.14) | |
Ant. IV | 0.10 | (0.09-0.10) | |
Ant. V | 0.10 | (0.10-0.11) | |
Ant. VIb | 0.08 | (0.08-0.08) | |
PT | 0.17 | (0.16-0.17) | |
URS | 0.09 | (0.09-0.10) | |
Hind femur | 0.29 | (0.29-0.30) | |
Hind tibia | 0.45 | (0.45-0.47) | |
2HT | 0.09 | (0.08-0.09) | |
SIPH | 0.02 | (0.02-0.03) | |
Knob of Cauda | 0.05 | (0.05-0.05) | |
Width of the knob of Cauda | 0.05 | (0.05-0.05) | |
Longest seta on Ant. III | 0.02 | (0.01-0.02) | |
Longest seta on AbdT. III | 0.14 | (0.14-0.15) | |
No. of setae on | Mandibular lamina | 6 | (6-7) |
Ant. I | 3 | (3-4) | |
Ant. II | 3 | (3-3) | |
Ant. III | 2 | (2-3) | |
URS (subsidiary) | 6 | (6-7) | |
Tergite VI between SIPH | 10 | (9-11) | |
Tergite VIII | 11 | (10-11) | |
Median of GP | 4 | (3-6) | |
Posterior margin of GP | 13 | (12-15) | |
Knob of Cauda | 7 | (6-8) | |
No. of secondary rhinaria on | Ant. III | 0 | |
Ant. IV | 0 | ||
Ant. V | 0 | ||
Ratio (times) | Whole antennae / Body | 0.52 | (0.51-0.53) |
PT / Ant. VIb | 1.97 | (1.94-1.97) | |
PT / Ant. III | 1.21 | (1.21-1.21) | |
URS / 2HT | 1.10 | (1.10-1.11) | |
URS / Ant.VIb | 1.14 | (1.14-1.15) | |
SIPH / Body | 0.02 | (0.02-0.02) | |
SIPH / Ant. III | 0.21 | (0.20-0.21) | |
SIPH / Hind femur | 0.10 | (0.10-0.10) | |
SIPH / Cauda | 0.49 | (0.47-0.51) | |
Knob of Cauda / Width of the knob of Cauda | 1.00 | (1.00-1.02) | |
Seta on Ant. III / Ant. IIIBD | 1.00 | (0.90-1.00) | |
Seta on AbdT. III / Ant. IIIBD | 7.35 | (7.14-7.37) |
Salix caprea, S. herbacea, S. rorida, S. viminalis, Salix spp. (
Chaitophorus horii morphologically resembles C. purpureae. However, it is distinguished by its beak-shaped URS and long dorsal setae.
Korea (new record), South Europe, Japan, Thailand (
Apterous viviparous female (Fig.
Part |
Apterous vivipara (n = 17) |
||
Average (Min-Max) | |||
Length (mm) |
Body (from the most forward point of the frons to end of Cauda) |
1.98 |
(1.96-2.39) |
Whole Ant. |
1.17 |
(1.14-1.41) |
|
Ant. I |
0.07 |
(0.07-0.08) |
|
Ant. II |
0.05 |
(0.05-0.06) |
|
Ant. III |
0.31 |
(0.30-0.37) |
|
Ant. IV |
0.17 |
(0.17-0.20) |
|
Ant. V |
0.14 |
(0.13-0.16) |
|
Ant. VIb |
0.10 |
(0.09-0.13) |
|
PT |
0.30 |
(0.30-0.39) |
|
URS |
0.11 |
(0.11-0.12) |
|
Hind femur |
0.51 |
(0.51-0.52) |
|
Hind tibia |
0.69 |
(0.68-0.70) |
|
2HT |
0.12 |
(0.11-0.13) |
|
SIPH |
0.04 |
(0.04-0.05) |
|
Knob of Cauda |
0.06 |
(0.05-0.06) |
|
Width of the knob of Cauda | 0.06 | (0.05-0.06) | |
Longest seta on Ant. III |
0.06 |
(0.06-0.07) |
|
Longest seta on AbdT. III |
0.13 |
(0.12-0.14) |
|
No. of setae on |
Mandibular lamina |
8 |
(7-10) |
Ant. I |
5 |
(4-5) |
|
Ant. II |
4 |
(4-5) |
|
Ant. III |
15 |
(12-17) |
|
URS (subsidiary) |
8 |
(7-8) |
|
Tergite VI between SIPH |
10 |
(9-12) |
|
Tergite VIII |
7 |
(7-8) |
|
Median of GP |
10 |
(9-14) |
|
Posterior margin of GP |
19 |
(17-21) |
|
Knob of Cauda |
8 |
(7-8) |
|
No. of secondary rhinaria on |
Ant. III |
0 |
|
Ant. IV |
0 |
||
Ant. V |
0 |
||
Ratio (times) |
Whole Ant. / Body |
0.59 |
(0.59-0.61) |
PT / Ant. VIb |
3.01 |
(3.00-3.10) |
|
PT / Ant. III |
0.98 |
(0.98-0.98) |
|
URS / 2HT |
0.97 |
(0.93-1.01) |
|
URS / Ant. VIb |
1.17 |
(1.15-1.18) |
|
SIPH / Body |
0.02 |
(0.02-0.03) |
|
SIPH / Ant. III |
0.16 |
(0.15-0.17) |
|
SIPH / Hind femur |
0.10 |
(0.09-0.10) |
|
SIPH / Knob of Cauda |
0.80 |
(0.78-0.87) |
|
Knob of Cauda / Width of the knob of Cauda |
1.02 |
(1.00-1.04) |
|
Longest seta on Ant. III / Ant. IIIBD |
2.62 |
(2.60-2.73) |
|
Longest seta on AbdT. III / Ant. IIIBD |
5.15 |
(5.14-5.27) |
Populus alba, P. deltoides, P. nigra, P. simonii, Populus spp. (
This species typically has pigmentation on the dorsum, frons and SIPH, but the pigmentation on the dorsum varies depending on the specimen, whereas the pigmentation on the frons and SIPH is always present. Korean Chaitophorus leucomelas has faintly pigmented dorsum, but the frons and SIPH distinctly have pigmentation. Additionally, the pigmentation of antennae and their ratio and dorsal cuticles with nodules follow the referred description (
Korea (new record), China, Kazakhstan, Mongolia, Siberia, Europe, Canada, USA, Chile, Africa (
Apterous viviparous female (Fig.
Part |
Apterous vivipara (n = 20) |
||
Average (Min-Max) | |||
Length (mm) |
Body (from the most forward point of the frons to end of Cauda) |
1.52 |
(1.37-1.69) |
Whole Ant. |
0.83 |
(0.75-0.91) |
|
Ant. I |
0.05 |
(0.04-0.06) |
|
Ant. II |
0.05 |
(0.04-0.05) |
|
Ant. III |
0.17 |
(0.14-0.19) |
|
Ant. IV |
0.12 |
(0.10-0.13) |
|
Ant. V |
0.10 |
(0.09-0.11) |
|
Ant. VIb |
0.09 |
(0.08-0.10) |
|
PT |
0.23 |
(0.21-0.24) |
|
URS |
0.08 |
(0.08-0.09) |
|
Hind femur |
0.31 |
(0.28-0.33) |
|
Hind tibia |
0.49 |
(0.45-0.51) |
|
2HT |
0.12 |
(0.11-0.12) |
|
SIPH |
0.05 |
(0.05-0.06) |
|
Knob of Cauda |
0.03 |
(0.03-0.03) |
|
Width of the knob of Cauda | 0.04 | (0.04-0.04) | |
Longest seta on Ant. III |
0.07 |
(0.05-0.10) |
|
Longest seta on AbdT. III |
0.15 |
(0.12-0.18) |
|
No. of setae on |
Mandibular lamina |
8 |
(7-8) |
Ant. I |
6 |
(5-6) |
|
Ant. II |
4 |
(4-5) |
|
Ant. III |
7 |
(5-8) |
|
URS (subsidiary) |
8 |
(7-9) |
|
Tergite VI between SIPH |
12 |
(10-15) |
|
Tergite VIII |
9 |
(8-10) |
|
Median of GP |
5 |
(4-7) |
|
Posterior margin of GP |
15 |
(14-18) |
|
Knob of Cauda |
6 |
(4-6) |
|
No. of secondary rhinaria on |
Ant. III |
0 |
|
Ant. IV |
0 |
||
Ant. V |
0 |
||
Ratio (times) |
Whole Ant. / Body |
0.55 |
(0.51-0.58) |
PT / Ant. VIb |
2.55 |
(2.49-2.61) |
|
PT / Ant. III |
1.32 |
(1.30-1.35) |
|
URS / 2HT |
0.68 |
(0.62-0.71) |
|
URS / Ant. VIb |
0.89 |
(0.84-0.92) |
|
SIPH / Body |
0.03 |
(0.03-0.03) |
|
SIPH / Ant. III |
0.29 |
(0.22-0.35) |
|
SIPH / Hind femur |
0.16 |
(0.14-0.17) |
|
SIPH / Knob of Cauda |
1.50 |
(1.47-1.52) |
|
Knob of Cauda / Width of the knob of Cauda |
0.77 |
(0.75-0.78) |
|
Longest seta on Ant. III / Ant. IIIBD |
3.04 |
(2.94-3.10) |
|
Longest seta on AbdT. III / Ant. IIIBD |
6.04 |
(5.87-6.24) |
S. babylonica, S. caprea, S. integra, S. koriyanagi, Salix spp. (
C. salijaponicus closely resembles C. hokkaidensis morphologically. However, it can be distinguished by the state of abdominal tergite I: in C. salijaponicus, it is free, whereas in C. hokkaidensis, it is completely fused with the preceding segment.
Korea (new record), China, Siberia, Mongolia, Japan (
Apterous viviparous female (Fig.
Part |
Apterous vivipara (n = 7) |
||
Average (Min-Max) | |||
Length (mm) |
Body (from the most forward point of the frons to end of Cauda) |
2.20 |
(1.94-2.34) |
Whole Ant. |
1.25 |
(1.09-1.32) |
|
Ant. I |
0.06 |
(0.05-0.07) |
|
Ant. II |
0.05 |
(0.04-0.05) |
|
Ant. III |
0.35 |
(0.31-0.38) |
|
Ant. IV |
0.20 |
(0.17-0.21) |
|
Ant. V |
0.16 |
(0.15-0.17) |
|
Ant. VIb |
0.11 |
(0.10-0.12) |
|
PT |
0.30 |
(0.25-0.32) |
|
URS |
0.09 |
(0.08-0.10) |
|
Hind femur |
0.55 |
(0.49-0.58) |
|
Hind tibia |
0.69 |
(0.64-0.74) |
|
2HT |
0.12 |
(0.11-0.14) |
|
SIPH |
0.06 |
(0.06-0.07) |
|
Knob of Cauda |
0.06 |
(0.05-0.06) |
|
Width of the knob of Cauda | 0.06 | (0.06-0.06) | |
Longest seta on Ant. III |
0.08 |
(0.06-0.09) |
|
Longest seta on AbdT. III |
0.17 |
(0.15-0.20) |
|
No. of setae on |
Mandibular lamina |
8 |
(7-10) |
Ant. I |
8 |
(7-10) |
|
Ant. II |
5 |
(4-6) |
|
Ant. III |
11 |
(9-13) |
|
URS (subsidiary) |
8 |
(7-8) |
|
Tergite VI between SIPH |
16 |
(15-18) |
|
Tergite VIII |
12 |
(11-13) |
|
Median of GP |
8 |
(4-10) |
|
Posterior margin of GP |
16 |
(14-22) |
|
Cauda |
6 |
(5-7) |
|
No. of secondary rhinaria on |
Ant. III |
0 |
|
Ant. IV |
0 |
||
Ant. V |
0 |
||
Ratio (times) |
Whole Ant. / Body |
0.57 |
(0.51-0.60) |
PT / Ant. VIb |
2.73 |
(2.59-2.84) |
|
PT / Ant. III |
0.85 |
(0.76-0.91) |
|
URS / 2HT |
0.72 |
(0.68-0.75) |
|
URS / Ant. VIb |
0.83 |
(0.79-0.85) |
|
SIPH / Body |
0.03 |
(0.03-0.03) |
|
SIPH / Ant. III |
0.18 |
(0.17-0.19) |
|
SIPH / Hind femur |
0.11 |
(0.10-0.12) |
|
SIPH / Knob of Cauda |
1.19 |
(1.18-1.21) |
|
Knob of Cauda/ Width of the knob of Cauda |
0.82 |
(0.75-0.85) |
|
Longest seta on Ant. III / Ant. IIIBD |
3.00 |
(2.86-3.14) |
|
Longest seta on AbdT. III / Ant. IIIBD |
6.07 |
(5.87-6.24) |
P. maximowiczii, P. sieboldii, P. simonii, P. tremula (
C. tremulae closely resembles C. salijaponicus morphologically. However, it can be distinguished by body length and marginal tergites: in C. tremulae, body length is longer than 1.8 mm and has no sclerotised marginal tergites, whereas in C. salijaponicus, body length is shorter than 1.8 mm and sclerotised marginal tergites are developed.
Korea (new record), Great Britain, Netherlands, Germany, Denmark, Spain, Norway, Finland, Poland, Hungary, Turkey, Russia, Caucasus, Kazakhstan, Siberia, China, Mongolia, Japan (
Key to the species of the genus Chaitophorus in the Korean Peninsula (apterous viviparous female) (modified from Albert Pintera (1987) and Blackman and Eastop (2024)). |
||
1 | Pseudosensoria present on hind tibia | 2 |
– | Pseudosensoria absent on hind tibia | 3 |
2 | Pseudosensoria scattered over nearly whole hind tibia. Live on Populus spp. | C. populeti (Panzer, 1801) |
– | Pseudosensoria (approximately 12) on the enlarged part near the knees of the hind tibia. Live on Salix spp. | C. saliniger Shinji, 1924 |
3 | Body wholly pale | 4 |
– | Body wholly or partly pigmented | 11 |
4 | Abdominal tergite I fused with the following tergite. URS with beak-shaped or U-shaped | 5 |
– | Abdominal tergite I not fused with the following tergite. URS with U-shaped | 6 |
5 | URS with beak-shaped. URS/2HT 1.1. PT/Ant. VIb 2.0. Dorsal setae usually furcated. Live on Salix spp. | C. horii Takahashi, 1939 |
– | URS with U-shaped. URS/2HT 0.8. PT/Ant. VIb 2.0-2.5. Dorsal setae long, not furcated. Live on Salix purpurea var. smithiana | C. purpureae Lee and Seo, 1992 |
6 | Abdominal tergite VII completely fused with the preceding tergite. SIPH dark. Live on Populus spp. | C. leucomelas Koch, 1854 |
– | Abdominal tergite VII mostly free with the preceding tergite. SIPH pale | 7 |
7 | Longest seta on Ant. III and AbdT. III almost 3-6 times as long as the basal diameter of Ant. III, respectively. Live on Populus spp. | C. populialbae (Boyer de Fonscolombe, 1841) |
– | Longest seta on Ant. III and AbdT. III less than 1.2 times and 3.2 times as long as the basal diameter of Ant. III, respectively | 8 |
8 | Body elongate, oval without pigmentation. Microstructure consisting of blunt nodules, very sparsely distributed in the middle of dorsum and head, often poorly visible. Live on Salix spp. | C. saliapterus Shinji, 1924 |
– | Body rather elongate, oval and fuscous. Microstructure not developed or, at most, with small granules on the frons. Live on Salix spp. or Populus spp. | 9 |
9 | Seta on Ant. III short, not more than twice as long as basal diameter of Ant. III. Ant. V with 2-3 setae. SIPH pigmented and reticulated on all their length. Live on Salix bakko | C. matsumurai Hille Ris Lambers, 1960 |
– | Seta on Ant. III more than 4 times as long as basal diameter of Ant. III. PT more than 4 times as long as basal part of Ant. VI. Microstructure developed only with small granules on the frons. Live on Populus koreanus | C. variegatus Szelegiewicz, 1981 |
10 | Body length longer than 1.8 mm, usually over 2 mm. Live on Populus spp. | C. tremulae Koch, 1854 |
– | Body length 1.3-1.9 mm. Live on Salix spp. | 11 |
11 | Abdominal tergite I free. Body length shorter than 1.8 mm, usually about 1.5 mm. Live on Salix spp. | C. salijaponicus Essig and Kuwana, 1918 |
– | Abdominal tergite I completely fused with the preceding one. Body length shorter than 1.8 mm, usually about 1.4 mm. Live on Salix spp. | C. hokkaidensis Higuchi, 1972 |
Chaitophorus species have been studied from 311 historically old slide-mounted specimens collected across North and South Korea and stored at SNU. Amongst these, we confirmed 10 valid species: C. horii Takahashi, 1939 (new record); C. leucomelas Koch, 1854 (new record); C. salijaponicus Essig and Kuwana, 1918 (new record); C. tremulae Koch, 1854 (new record); C. hokkaidensis Higuchi, 1972; C. populeti (Panzer, 1801); C. populialbae (Boyer de Fonscolombe, 1841); C. purpureae Lee and Seo, 1992; C. saliapterus Shinji, 1924; and C. saliniger Shinji, 1924 (Fig.
In 1941, Shinji reported C. narae Shinji, 1941 for the first time from a Korean specimen. However, this species was associated with a host plant from the order Fagales — an atypical host for Chaitophorus, which primarily feeds on Salix and Populus species. Additionally, Shinji’s morphological description of the species lacked sufficient detail, complicating subsequent taxonomic efforts. The combination of an unusual host plant, the limited number of specimens and inadequate morphological characterisation has hindered further research on this species. As a result, C. narae Shinji, 1941 has been excluded from the taxonomic key of Korean Chaitophorus species.
C. variegatus and C. matsumurai were recorded by
For future studies, an integrated classification system, based on morphological characteristics and DNA barcode data is necessary, along with a comparative analysis with global datasets.
We are grateful to Dr. Hong-yul Seo of the National Institute of Biological Resources (NIBR), Incheon 22689, Republic of Korea, for the loan of the C. purpureae specimen. We also thank an anonymous reviewer, Dr. Colin Favret and Daisuke Sasaki for their dedicated reviews, which greatly improved this manuscript. This work was supported by the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) grant funded by the Korean government (MSIT) (No. RS-2024-00405751) and the National Institute of Biological Resources (NIBR), funded by the Ministry of Environment (MOE) of the Republic of Korea (NIBR202402202).