|
Biodiversity Data Journal :
Taxonomy & Inventories
|
|
Corresponding author: Pongthep Suwanwaree (pongthep@sut.ac.th)
Academic editor: Riccardo Castiglia
Received: 03 Apr 2025 | Accepted: 22 Jun 2025 | Published: 22 Jul 2025
© 2025 Dawn Cook-Price, Sunchai Makchai, Archana Naithani, Parinya Pawangkhanant, Pongthep Suwanwaree
This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Citation:
Cook-Price DR, Makchai S, Naithani A, Pawangkhanant P, Suwanwaree P (2025) Lizard survey of Ko Pha-gnan in the Surat Thani Province, Thailand. Biodiversity Data Journal 13: e154712. https://doi.org/10.3897/BDJ.13.e154712
|
|
Insular lizard species are under-assessed, rendering them vulnerable to habitat encroachment and other anthropogenic threats. The aim of this study was to compile a comprehensive list of the lizards on Ko Pha-ngan, Thailand. Data were collected via transect surveys, drift line fence traps and opportunistic encounters from January 2021 to October 2023. Three habitat types were surveyed during this period, Than Sadet-Ko Pha-ngan National Park forest, human disturbed forest and human settlement.
Our efforts detected a total of 16 lizard species. All species were observed in the national park protected areas, while 12 species in human disturbed forest and seven species in human settlement. Five species (Calotes versicolor, Gekko gecko, Hemidactylus frenatus, Hemidactylus platyurus and Varanus nebulosus) were found in all three habitat types. The two most abundant species detected were C. versicolor and G. gecko. Four species (C. versicolor, G. gecko, Hemidactylus frenatus and Varanus salvator) have exhibited adaptability in human dominated landscapes. Of the species, only one, V. nebulosus is listed as Near Threatened on the International Union for Conservation of Nature Red List of threatened species. The National Park is of growing importance for the survival of the insular species found due to the naturally constricted area of an island. This study sheds light on the need for additional monitoring to better understand the dynamics and the impact tourism-driven development and habitat destruction have on species living in an insularly finite habitat.
biodiversity, conservation, insular populations, island biogeography, species list, reptiles
The Island of Pha-ngan, one of three notable islands in the Surat Thani Province, boasts a rich history of anthropogenic accommodation. Historically, Pha-ngan was connected to the mainland as part of the Sunda Shelf approximately 21,000 years ago during the early Holocene epoch (
Ko Pha-ngan experienced significant tin mining in the 1970s and the establishment of numerous coconut plantations, which contributed to the decline in primary forests (
Despite boasting over 523 species of reptiles, of which 236 are lizards, in Thailand (
The biodiversity of Ko Pha-ngan, predominantly shielded by the Than Sadet-Ko Pha-ngan National Park, remains both unique and understudied (
Occupying 125 km2 (15 km north to south and 10 km east to west) in the Gulf of Thailand, Ko Pha-ngan is located 80 km off the east coast of peninsular Thailand. The sland is home to the Than Sadet-Ko Pha-ngan National Park which occupies a third of the sland (42.9 km2) and a maximum elevation of 635 m for the entire sland (
From February 2021 through September 2023 (32 months), surveys were conducted on the sland of Pha-ngan approximately twice a week for a total of 78 weeks. A total of 1,343 survey hours were completed between 19:00 h and 02:00 h. Multiple factors such as proximity to water, access to private land and challenging terrain, were used to determine transect locations. Transect lengths varied, often due to terrain limitations.
There were 32 survey transects utilised (Fig.
In addition to foot surveys, strategically placed drift-line fence traps were employed across the island. Configured with a single funnel at one end and a double funnel at the other, each trap also incorporated a pitfall trap in the centre with a 10-metre-long and 1 metre high drift line made with a 3 mm sturdy plastic mesh (Fig.
Traps were strategically positioned across various habitats including the National Park Forest, plantations, human-disturbed forest and settlements. They were deployed starting from 1 February 2022 and were checked daily over a period of 236 days. In addition to foot surveys, these traps provided an extended window for sampling reptiles. Each lizard encountered was promptly identified and measured in the field whenever possible before being released back into its natural habitat. The operational period of the traps coincided with the later stages of foot surveys, covering a duration from February 2022 to August 2023. Specific traps were left open for varying durations, ranging from 7 - 90 days. Reptile identification was facilitated through consultation of reputable sources such as Thailand’s Natural History Museum database (http://nhmsearch.nsm.or.th). To assess species diversity, we employed two ecological indices: the Shannon–Wiener [H′ = −∑(pi × ln(pi))] and Simpson’s [D=1−∑(pi2]) (
Oriental garden lizard or changeable lizard.
This diurnal species (Fig.
Distribution. This species is well adapted to human settlement and has been detected in all three habitats. One hundred and forty individuals were detected throughout the National Park forest, human disturbed forest and human settlement. This species was most often observed on low vegetation between 30 cm to 150 cm above the ground where the vegetation and transect (trail, dirt track or paved road) meet (edge habitat). This species was distributed throughout the Island.
Forest lizard.
Twenty-six individuals of this species were detected most often in forested habitat. This species was detected on 10 occasions in two of the thirteen human disturbed forest transects and 15 occasions in five of the eleven National Park forest transects. Similarly to C. versicolor, this species was also most often detected at the edge of vegetation between 30 cm and 150 cm.
This species is phenotypically similar to C. versicolor. Most notable differentiating characteristics are the presence of granular scales in front of the fore-limb (front arm folds) and presence of a post-orbital spine (spike behind the eye) (Fig.
This species is arboreal and cryptic. It was detected in one National Park forest transect and one human disturbed forest transect.
This arboreal species (Fig.
Common butterfly lizard.
This species has a specialised habitat consisting of coastal sandy or scrub areas with loose sandy soil. Twenty-five individuals were detected in only two of the thirteen human disturbed forest transects along the coast in rocky, sandy areas. Though this lizard was detected in human disturbed forest areas, it is worth noting that they were detected very near National Park boundaries and are likely in National Park forest as well.
This species (Fig.
Chan-ard’s rock gecko.
A total of 14 individuals were detected in two of the three habitat types. There were ten individuals detected in eight different National Park habitat transects and three individuals in two different human disturbed forest transects. This species primarily inhabited rocky forested habitat.
This species (Fig.
Short-hand forest gecko.
Two individuals were observed in one National Park forest transect.
This species (Fig.
Spotted bent-toed gecko, ocelot gecko.
Two individuals were observed in one National Park forest transect.
This species is nocturnal. Diet consists of a variety of insects and other invertebrates (
Tokay gecko.
This species is distributed throughout the entire sland in all habitat types. One hundred and fifty-four individuals were observed in 21 of the 32 transects surveyed. This species was detected in six of the eight National Park forest transects, eight of the thirteen human disturbed forest transects and seven of the eight human settlement transects.
This species is well adapted to human settlement areas often living in houses, abandoned buildings and forested areas. An omnivorous species with a diet including a variety of insects, other invertebrates and small vertebrates. Gekko gecko exhibits parental care living in temporary family groups until offspring reach sexual maturity (
Common house gecko.
This species is prevalent throughout the sland. A total of 38 individuals were detected on surveys not including the four that reside in the author’s residence. This species was detected in five of the thirteen human disturbed forest areas, six of the eleven National Park forest transects and three of the eight human settlement transects.
This species (Fig.
Flat-tailed house gecko or frilled house gecko.
Seven individuals were observed between two of the eight human settlement transects, one of the thirteen human disturbed forest areas and one of the eleven National Park forest transects.
Defining characteristics of this species include flattened body and distinctive frilled toe pads. Generally brown or grey in colouration with darker markings. This species feeds on a variety of insects including significant amounts of mosquitoes, other invertebrates and it has been documented eating food waste such as rice or fruit (
Cambodian parachute gecko.
Three individuals were detected in two of the eleven National Park forest transects.
This species (Fig.
Clouded monitor lizard
Seven individuals were detected in one of the eleven different National Park forest transects and five in four of the thirteen different human disturbed forest transects contiguous to National Park forest areas. On one occasion, V. nebulosus was opportunistically observed in a human settlement area at the edge of a montane National Park area (not a transect). This opportunistic observation was witnessed as dogs were chasing the lizard and it took refuge in a tree.
This diurnal, semi-arboreal, carnivorous species (Fig.
Water monitor lizard
This species was detected throughout the island. Of the 27 individuals, 12 were detected in six of the eight human settlement transects. Nine of the individuals were detected in five of the thirteen human disturbed forest transects and six individuals were detected in two of the eleven National Park forest transects.
This diurnal, semi-aquatic medium- to large-sized lizard (Fig.
Many-lined skink or common sun skink
This species is omnivorous as it is known to forage for and feed on a variety of insects, larvae, other invertebrates and sometimes plants (
A total of 26 individuals were detected in all habitat types. Five of the eleven National Park forest transects four of the thirteen human disturbed forest transects and four of the eight human settlement transects.
Long tailed sun skink
This species is diurnal and an active hunter. Diet consists of a variety of insects, earth worms, various other invertebrates, small eggs (reptile), seeds, fruit and leaves (
Bowring’s supple skink.
A total of nine individuals were detected in 2 of the 11 national park forest transects, 2 of the 13 national park forest transects and 1 of the human disturbed forest transects.
This species (Fig.
The study documents a total of 16 lizard species from 11 genera and four families on Ko Pha-ngan, comprising seven species of Gekkonidae, four species of Agamidae, three species of Scincidae and two species of Varanidae. This research significantly augments the existing records maintained by the Department of National Parks, Wildlife and Plant Conservation (
Of the surveyed species, only one (Varanus nebulosus) is listed as near threatened on the International Union for Conservation of Nature and Natural Resources list (
|
IUCN Status |
Habitat Type |
||||
|
HS |
HDF |
NPF |
|||
|
Index |
|||||
|
Shannon-Weiner |
1.86 |
1.41 |
2.40 |
||
|
Simpson’s |
0.683 |
0.778 |
0.890 |
||
|
Family |
Species |
||||
|
Agamidae |
Calotes versicolor* |
LC |
31 |
80 |
29 |
|
Calotes emma* |
LC |
0 |
12 |
14 |
|
|
Draco maculatus |
LC |
1 |
0 |
1 |
|
|
Leiolepis belliana |
LC |
0 |
14 |
11 |
|
|
Gekkonidae |
Cnemaspis chanardi |
LC |
0 |
4 |
10 |
|
Cyrtodactylus brevipalmatus |
LC |
0 |
0 |
2 |
|
|
Cyrtodactylus zebraicus |
LC |
0 |
14 |
14 |
|
|
Gekko gecko* |
LC |
57 |
80 |
18 |
|
|
Hemidactylus frenatus* |
LC |
10 |
15 |
13 |
|
|
Hemidactylus platyurus* |
LC |
4 |
1 |
2 |
|
|
Gekko tokehos |
LC |
0 |
0 |
3 |
|
|
Varanidae |
Varanus nebulosus* |
NT |
0 |
5 |
1 |
|
Varanus salvator* |
LC |
12 |
10 |
5 |
|
|
Scincidae |
Eutropis multifasciata |
LC |
0 |
12 |
14 |
|
Eutropis longicaudata |
LC |
0 |
0 |
3 |
|
|
Subdoluseps bowringi |
LC |
4 |
3 |
2 |
|
|
Total |
119 |
250 |
142 |
||
DD = Data Deficient, LC = Least Concern, HS = Human Settlement, HDF = Human Disturbed Forest, NPF = National Park Forest. *New record from the Than Sadet - Ko Pha-ngan National Park checklist.
Our analysis revealed that lizard diversity was highest in the National Park forest regions. The Shannon-Wiener Diversity Index, which accounts for both species richness (the number of species) and evenness (how equally individuals are distributed amongst those species), was highest in the National Park forest (2.40). Interestingly, although human settlements hosted fewer species overall than human‑disturbed forest, they nevertheless showed a higher Shannon–Wiener value (HS = 1.86 vs. HDF = 1.41), indicating a more even distribution of individuals amongst the species present.
To test these differences, we calculated H′ for each transect survey (HS: n = 41; HDF: n = 35; NPF: n = 80). Mean ± SD values were HS = 1.86 ± 0.32, HDF = 1.41 ± 0.28 and NPF = 2.40 ± 0.23. A one‑way ANOVA confirmed significant habitat effects (F₂,₁₅₃ = 41.2, p < 0.001); post‑hoc Tukey HSD showed both HS and NPF to be more diverse than HDF (p = 0.015 and p < 0.001, respectively), while HS vs. NPF did not differ (p = 0.22). A Kruskal–Wallis test yielded a consistent result (χ² = 23.5, p < 0.001).
To examine beta diversity, we applied the Bray–Curtis dissimilarity index to our transect‑by‑species abundance matrix. This index, which ranges from 0 (identical composition) to 1 (completely different), quantifies compositional turnover between sites. We visualised these results as a clustered heatmap (Fig.
Bray–Curtis dissimilarity amongst species based on habitat abundances, where each square shows the dissimilarity between pairs of lizard species from 0 (completely similar, same species) to 1 (completely dissimilar (different), no species in common). Dissimilarity is calculated on the total abundance of each species in HS, HDF and NPF. The colour of each square indicates the level of dissimilarity with darker squares indicating species with different habitat distribution. The dendrograms cluster species by similarity in their habitat use.
Specialist taxa, such as Cyrtodactylus brevipalmatus and Ptychozoon tokehos, found only in the National Park forest, appear as darker blocks against generalists like Gekko gecko, which display lighter shading across habitats. This species‑level clustering highlights which lizards are habitat specialists and may, therefore, be more vulnerable to environmental change.
A higher value of Simpson’s Index signifies higher diversity and lower dominance by any one species. In our study, the National Park forest exhibited the most natural ecosystem with a Simpson’s Index of 0.890, indicating less dominance and greater species distribution equality. This was followed by the human disturbed forest (0.778) and the human settlement areas (0.683), respectively.
The data underscore the importance of conservation initiatives. Given the finite nature of an island, as habitat degradation escalates, the available space for species diminishes, intensifying competition for resources.
Our study on the lizards of Ko Pha-ngan has uncovered nine previously unrecorded species, including Gekko tokehos, Draco maculatus, Leiolepis belliana, Cnemaspis chanardi, Cyrtodactylus brevipalmatus, Cyrtodactylus zebraicus, Eutropis multifasciata, Eutropis longicaudata and Subdoluseps bowringi. These species exhibit a diverse range of behaviour, inhabiting various habitats across the island, from densely forested areas to coastal scrub regions. Our discovery was made possible through transect survey observations and the use of funnel traps. However, further research, particularly in the sland's more secluded, forested regions, may unveil additional unrecorded species. Extended trapping efforts could also enhance our understanding of species diversity across an ever-changing landscape.
In recent decades, Ko Pha-ngan has undergone significant landscape changes, transitioning from a tin-mining hub to a landscape dominated by plantations with scattered remnants of native forests (
Islands are particularly susceptible to species extinction due to finite habitat availability, as noted by classic biogeography theory which suggests that smaller islands support fewer species. This vulnerability is compounded by anthropogenic changes such as deforestation and habitat fragmentation (
Detectability remains a caveat: dense canopy in the National Park Forest can obscure cryptic, arboreal species (e.g. Ptychozoon tokehos), while open edges and settlements improve visibility for conspicuous generalists. The slightly heightened diversity in NPF likely reflects both genuine richness and the challenge of detecting certain taxa under heavy canopy. Conversely, human‑altered landscapes favour adaptable species (
As a whole, Thailand's herpetofauna diversity is considered high (
This adaptability is evident in the face of rapid environmental changes, hinting at why some species flourish, while others are at risk. While some reptile species (Calotes versicolor, Varanus salvator, Gekko gecko, Hemidactylus frenatus and Hemidactylus platyurus) demonstrate adaptability to Ko Pha-ngan's shifting environment, others are at risk, particularly those species endemic to specific habitats, such as Calotes emma, Cyrtodactylus brevipalmatus, Gekko tokehos, and the shy and near-threatened Varanus nebulosus.
Phuket, the largest island in Thailand (543 km2) and the nearby islands of Yao Noi (45 km2) and Yao Yai (92 km2) are much closer to the mainland. Phuket is connected by a bridge less than 1 km long and the two smaller islands are much less developed than Phuket. Phuket has 14 lizard species (
Tarutao, a protected and more pristine island located in the southern peninsular Satun Province approximately 25 km from peninsular mainland (
Comparatively speaking, Ko Pha-ngan, 125 km2 and approximately 80 km from the mainland, differs from some of the other islands in SE Asia. For instance, the 97,530 km2 Mindanoa Island in the Phillippines is much larger than Ko Pha-ngan in addition to being 100 times further from the mainland 800 km. Boasting 49 species of lizard, Mindanoa has varied habitat, though primarily rainforest, deforestation is a major concern (
Bidong island, the largest island at 1 km2 in the Archipelago of the same name is located approximately 14 km from the mainland coast of Peninsular Malaysia in the South China Sea (
Tioman Island (48 km2), situated 38 km of the coast of the southern Malaysian Peninsula in the South China Sea, houses 33 lizard species (
Across the gulf of Thailand, on the eastern shore, are the Koh Man Islands, near (7 km) the mainland, having nine lizard species. Seven of which are the same as on Ko Pha-ngan (Calotes versicolor, Eutropis multifasciata, Varanus salvator, Leiolepis belliana, Hemidactylus platyurus, Hemidactylus frenatus, Gekko gecko), with only two differences, Gehyra mutilata and Lygosoma bowringii (
Throughout the entire Peninsular Malaysia, there are approximately 108 lizard species (
To augment our understanding, in-depth research in the sland's remote forested locales is pivotal. Prolonged studies might reveal a more nuanced diversity profile. While the Surat Thani mainland has undergone rigorous examination, its islands remain terra incognita for reptile research.
Our study on Ko Pha-ngan documents a remarkable diversity of lizard species, identifying 16 species from 11 genera. This includes nine species previously unrecorded by the Department of National Parks, Wildlife and Plant Conservation. The highest species richness and diversity were observed in the National Park forest, highlighting the critical role of undisturbed habitats in maintaining biodiversity. Our findings underscore the adaptability of certain species to human-disturbed environments, though others remain confined to more pristine areas.
The high beta diversity observed between habitats reflects significant variations in species composition, indicating habitat specificity for some species. Conservation efforts should prioritise protecting the remaining forested areas and mitigating the impacts of habitat fragmentation caused by rapid tourism development. The comparison with other islands emphasises the unique ecological dynamics of Ko Pha-ngan and the necessity for continued research to uncover potentially undiscovered species and understand the full extent of its herpetofaunal diversity.
The data underscore the importance of preserving diverse habitats to maintain ecological balance and support a wide range of species. As habitat degradation escalates due to anthropogenic pressures, proactive conservation strategies become crucial to safeguard the sland's biodiversity for future generations.
This work was supported by Suranaree University of Technology and would not be possible without the permission of Department of National Parks, Wildlife and Plant Conservation and the support of Than Sadet-Ko Pha-ngan National Park staff. The authors would also like to thank the Warsaw Zoo for the continued support and the reviewers and editors for their valuable input. Research and ethics permissions were also provided by Suranaree University of Technology Ethics Committee and National Research Council of Thailand. Photographs were taken by the author and interns James Covert and Vikas Kumar.