|
Biodiversity Data Journal :
Research Article
|
|
Corresponding author: Denise J.B. Swanborn (denise.swanborn@uwa.edu.au)
Academic editor: Danwei Huang
Received: 11 Dec 2025 | Accepted: 24 Jan 2026 | Published: 03 Mar 2026
© 2026 Alan Jamieson, Denise Swanborn, Todd Bond, Megan Cundy, Yoshihiro Fujiwara, Dhugal Lindsay, Melanie Stott, Hiroshi Kitazato
This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Citation:
Jamieson AJ, Swanborn DJB, Bond T, Cundy MC, Fujiwara Y, Lindsay D, Stott MS, Kitazato H (2026) Faunal biodiversity of the lower abyssal and hadal zones of the Japan, Ryukyu and Izu-Ogasawara trenches (NW Pacific Ocean; 4534-9775 m). Biodiversity Data Journal 14: e182172. https://doi.org/10.3897/BDJ.14.e182172
|
|
In-situ video-based observations collected using multiple platforms are increasingly used for biodiversity assessments at abyssal and hadal depths, sometimes complemented by physical sampling. Here, we present an imagery-based guide and biodiversity record of organisms observed in the Japan, Ryukyu and Izu-Ogasawara trenches in the Northwest Pacific Ocean between 4534 m and 9775 m. The guide compiles morphotaxa identifications, reference imagery and observational notes from approximately 460 hours of video footage obtained through baited lander and submersible transect surveys. A total of 108 morphotaxa were observed, which are listed here with locality and depth range. The illustrated occurrence list serves as a practical reference to aid in the identification of organisms in future image-based biodiversity assessments at these depths, to support voucher specimen collections and to provide a baseline record of faunal occurrence and distribution at these localities. Additionally, this study highlights the value of utilising multiple observation platforms to improve comprehensive biodiversity and behavioural assessments in abyssal and hadal ecosystems.
biodiversity, benthos, hadal zone, deep sea, imaging, ID guide
Sampling methodologies in the deepest 50% of the oceans have, in recent decades, seen a reversal in trends (
Amongst these, free-fall lander vehicles carrying baited cameras (stills and video) are the most frequently deployed tools at abyssal and hadal depths (> 4500 m), generating large datasets of mobile species attracted to bait (e.g.
Effective and sustainable management of deep-ocean ecosystems fundamentally relies on understanding the distribution of biodiversity. Knowledge of the diversity and distribution of species in the deepest 50% of the ocean lags greatly behind all other shallower regions (
However, in-situ imaging at lower abyssal and hadal depths is complicated by several factors. There are rarely physical samples for morphological or molecular taxonomy to develop taxonomic keys to corroborate all identifications (
The ideal approach for assessing biodiversity in lower abyssal and hadal ecosystems would be to undertake in-situ imaging and physical sampling concurrently (
This study contributes to that need by providing an imagery-based guide to the lower abyssal and hadal megafauna of the Japan, Ryukyu and Izu-Ogasawara trenches (including the Boso Triple Junction) between depths of 4534 and 9775 m. Crewed submersible observations in these trenches are limited as the Japanese national deep-sea submersible Shinkai 6500 is constrained to depths of 6500 m or less (
The following imagery-based guide contains in-situ observations and identifications of organisms encountered during baited lander deployments and crewed submersible transects at lower abyssal and hadal depths in the Japan, Ryukyu and Izu-Ogasawara trenches. Its purposes are to serve as a reference for future imagery-based surveys, to help provide information for the design of future sampling campaigns and to provide a baseline record of faunal occurrence in the lower abyssal and hadal zones of the Japan, Ryukyu and Izu-Ogasawara trenches. Ecological analyses of the baited landers dataset are discussed in
The Japan, Izu-Ogasawara and Ryukyu trenches (Fig.
Bathymetry of the Northwest Pacific Ocean with specific study areas labelled. Inset maps relate to individual study sites described here in: Japan Trench (A), Boso triple junction (B), Izu-Ogasawara Trench (C) and Ryukyu Trench (D), with locations of submersible dives and lander deployments indicated. All regional elevation data sourced from the General Bathymetric Chart of the Oceans (GEBCO Compilation Group 2024) and multibeam bathymetry data at study sites acquired for this study onboard DSSV Pressure Drop, which was supplemented with GEBCO data for the Ryukyu Trench (D).
Japan Trench
Located parallel to the east coast of the Japanese mainland of Honshu, is the Japan Trench (Fig.
Izu-Ogasawara Trench and Boso triple junction
The Izu-Ogasawara trench (or Izu-Bonin Trench;
Ryukyu Trench
Parallel to the Japanese Nansei-Shotō Islands between Taiwan and Kyūshū is the Ryukyu Trench (or Nansei-Shotō Trench;
Survey areas were first mapped using a hull-mounted EM124 multibeam echosounder (MBES; Kongsberg, Norway;
Overview of submersible dives and lander deployments conducted in the Japan, Ryukyu and Izu-Ogasawara trenches. Indicated are the number of deployments per location, and their depth ranges. Further details can be found in Suppl. material
|
Submersible dives |
|||
|
Location |
Number |
Min Depth (m) |
Max Depth (m) |
|
Japan Trench |
4 |
7777 |
8002 |
|
7465 |
7529 |
||
|
6991 |
7313 |
||
|
7165 |
7370 |
||
|
Ryukyu Trench |
1 |
6937 |
7310 |
|
Izu-Ogasawara Trench + Boso Triple Junction |
2 |
9559 |
9775 |
|
8975 |
9137 |
||
|
Lander deployments |
|||
|
Location |
Number |
Min Depth (m) |
Max Depth (m) |
|
Japan Trench |
32 |
4913 |
8022 |
|
Ryukyu Trench |
6 |
5110 |
7340 |
|
Izu-Ogasawara Trench + Boso Triple Junction |
21 |
4534 |
9775 |
In the Japan Trench (Fig.
In the Izu-Ogasawara Trench (Fig.
In the Ryukyu Trench (Fig.
Video footage recorded in-situ from the baited landers and submersible dives was continuously annotated using EventMeasure (SeaGIS Pty Ltd, version 6.42) to generate records of taxa present. Submersible dive footage was only annotated if the submersible was on-bottom. Lander video footage was only annotated when the lander was on the seafloor (bottom time) using MaxN (also known as Nmax) which is a conservative metric of relative abundance and refers to the maximum number of individuals of each taxon observed at a single point in time (
All visible mobile fauna were identified to the lowest possible taxonomic rank using morphological characteristics. All identifications were derived from review of video footage from which still images were extracted, allowing us to distinguish morphotaxa using a combination of morphology, movement and behaviour. Where species-level identifications were not possible, taxa were placed in putative ‘morphotaxa’. The level of taxonomic precision achieved was indicated using the open taxonomic nomenclature signs recommended for image-based identifications by
Submersible and lander datasets were combined to provide an overview of morphotaxon occurrences across trenches (Table
Taxon list from the Izu-Ogasawara Trench (IOT), Japan Trench (JT) and Ryukyu Trench (RT) with locations of observations, depth ranges and reference to figures. n.s. = not shown due to low image quality.
| Taxon (Phylum - Class - Order - Family - ID) | Trench | Depth Range (m) | Fig. number |
| Animalia incerta sedis | IOT, JPT | 8022–9131 | Fig. |
| Annelida indet. 1 | IOT, JPT | 4534–8000 | Fig. |
| Annelida indet. 2 | JPT | 6579–6860 | Fig. |
| Annelida indet. 3 | JPT | 7259 | Fig. |
| Annelida – Echiuroidea spp. | JPT | 6883–8022 | ns |
| Annelida – Echiuroidea fam. indet. 1 | JPT | 6825–8022 | Fig. |
| Annelida – Echiuroidea fam. indet. 2 | JPT | 7528 | Fig. |
| Annelida – Echiuroidea fam. indet. 3 | JPT | 6883–7462 | Fig. |
| Annelida – Echiuroidea fam. indet. 4 | JPT | 6579 | ns |
| Annelida – Echiuroidea fam. indet. 6 | JPT | 7466–7529 | Fig. |
| Annelida – Annelida spp. | IOT, JPT, RT | 4913–9750 | Fig. |
| Annelida – Phyllodocida – Polynoidae – Macellicephalinae spp | IOT, JPT, RT | 6665–9745 | Fig. |
| Annelida – Phyllodocida – Polynoidae – Lepidonotopodini spp | JPT, RT | 7002–8001 | Fig. |
| Annelida – Phyllodocida – Polynoidae – Macellicephalinae gen. indet. 1 | PT | 7237–8001 | Fig. |
| Annelida – Phyllodocida – Polynoidae – Macellicephalinae gen. indet. 2 | RT | 7339 | Fig. |
| Annelida – Sabellida – Sabellidae spp. | IOT, JPT, RT | 6991–8001 | Fig. |
| Annelida – Sabellida – Sabellidae gen. indet. 1 | IOT | 9026 | Fig. |
| Annelida – Terebellida – Acrocirridae spp. | IOT, JPT, RT | 5531–7050 | Fig. |
| Annelida – Terebellida – Flabelligeridae spp. | JPT, RT | 5941–7571 | Fig. |
| Arthropoda – Copepoda spp. | IOT, JPT | 4913–7621 | Fig. |
| Arthropoda – Malacostraca – Amphipoda – Alicellidae – Allicella gigantea | IOT, JPT, RT | 6529–8022 | Fig. |
| Arthropoda – Malacostraca – Amphipoda – Eurytheneidae – Eurythenes spp. | RT | 6941–7310 | Fig. |
| Arthropoda – Malacostraca – Amphipoda spp. | IOT, JPT, RT | 6937–9773 | Fig. |
| Arthropoda – Malacostraca – Amphipoda – Pardaliscidae – Princaxelia jamiesoni | IOT, JPT | 7091–9742 | Fig. |
| Arthropoda – Malacostraca – Decapoda – Acanthephyridae – Heterogenys sp. indet. 1 | IOT, JPT, RT | 4534–6692 | Fig. |
| Arthropoda – Malacostraca – Decapoda – Aristeidae – Cerataspis monstrosus | IOT, JPT, RT | 4534–6529 | Fig. |
| Arthropoda – Malacostraca – Decapoda – Benthesicymidae – Benthesicymus crenatus | IOT, JPT, RT | 4534–7571 | Fig. |
| Arthropoda – Malacostraca – Isopoda – Antarcturidae gen. indet. | JPT | 7165–7345 | Fig. |
| Arthropoda – Malacostraca – Isopoda – Munnopsidae spp. | IOT, JPT, RT | 4534–9135 | Fig. |
| Arthropoda – Malacostraca – Isopoda – Munnopsidae – Rectisura herculea | IOT, JPT | 5525–8291 | Fig. |
| Arthropoda – Malacostraca – Mysida – Mysidae spp. | IOT, JPT, RT | 4534–9773 | Fig. |
| Arthropoda – Malacostraca – Tanaidacea – Gigantapseudidae – Gigantapseudes sp. indet. | RT | 6937–7150 | Fig. |
| Chaetognatha spp. | IOT, JPT, RT | 4913–6870 | Fig. |
| Chordata – Appendicularia – Copelata spp. | IOT, JPT, RT | 4534–8336 | Fig. |
| Chordata – Appendicularia – Copelata – Fritillariidae spp. | IOT, JPT | 5042–6579 | Fig. |
| Chordata – Appendicularia – Copelata – Oikopleuridae spp. | IOT, RT | 4534–5941 | Fig. |
| Chordata – Ascidiacea spp. | JPT | 7096–7345 | Fig. |
| Chordata – Ascidiacea – Phlebobranchia – Octacnemidae – Octacnemus sp. indet. | IOT, JPT | 6006–7316 | Fig. |
| Chordata – Ascidiacea – Phlebobranchia – Octacnemidae gen. indet. 1 | JPT | 7241–7290 | Fig. |
| Chordata – Ascidiacea – Phlebobranchia – Octacnemidae gen. indet. 2 | JPT | 7170–7342 | Fig. |
| Chordata – Ascidiacea – Phlebobranchia – Octacnemidae gen. indet. 3 | IOT, JPT | 7345–8077 | Fig. |
| Chordata – Teleostei – Anguilliformes – Synaphobranchidae – Ilyophis sp. indet. | IOT | 4534 | Fig. |
| Chordata – Teleostei – Beryciformes – Stephanoberycidae – Abyssoberyx sp. indet. | IOT | 5459 | Fig. |
| Chordata – Teleostei – Gadiformes – Macrouridae – Coryphaenoides armatus | IOT | 5042–5459 | Fig. |
| Chordata – Teleostei – Gadiformes – Macrouridae – Coryphaenoides yaquinae | IOT, JPT, RT | 4534–7259 | Fig. |
| Chordata – Teleostei – Ophidiiformes – Ophidiidae – Barathrites iris | RT | 5110–5941 | Fig. |
| Chordata – Teleostei – Ophidiiformes – Ophidiidae – Bassozetus sp. indet. 1 | IOT, JPT, RT | 4534–7079 | Fig. |
| Chordata – Teleostei – Ophidiiformes – Ophidiidae – Bassozetus sp. indet. 2 | IOT, JPT, RT | 5042–7079 | Fig. |
| Chordata – Teleostei – Ophidiiformes – Ophidiidae – Bassozetus sp. indet. 3 | IOT, JPT, RT | 5531–7079 | Fig. |
| Chordata – Teleostei – Ophidiiformes – Ophidiidae – Bassozetus sp. indet. 6 | IOT, JPT, RT | 5110–6529 | Fig. |
| Chordata – Teleostei – Perciformes – Liparidae – Pseudoliparis sp. indet. 1 | IOT, JPT, RT | 6023–8336 | Fig. |
| Chordata – Teleostei – Perciformes – Liparidae – Pseudoliparis sp. indet. 2 | IOT, JPT | 6579–7621 | Fig. |
| Chordata – Teleostei – Perciformes – Liparidae – Pseudoliparis sp. indet. 3 | IOT, JPT, RT | 6860–8022 | Fig. |
| Cnidaria – Hexacorallia – Anthozoa spp. | IOT, JPT, RT | 7309–9745 | Fig. |
| Cnidaria – Hexacorallia – Actiniaria spp. | IOT, JPT, RT | 6485–9617 | n.s. |
| Cnidaria – Hexacorallia – Actiniaria fam. indet. 1 | IOT, JPT | 7528–9775 | Fig. |
| Cnidaria – Hexacorallia – Actiniaria fam. indet. 2 | IOT, JPT | 7526–9137 | Fig. |
| Cnidaria – Hexacorallia – Actiniaria fam. indet. 3 | IOT, JPT | 7095–9745 | Fig. |
| Cnidaria – Hexacorallia – Actiniaria fam. indet. 4 | IOT, JPT | 7082–9734 | Fig. |
| Cnidaria – Hexacorallia – Actiniaria fam. indet. 5 | JPT | 7180–7363 | Fig. |
| Cnidaria – Hexacorallia – Actiniaria fam. indet. 6 | JPT | 7527–7528 | Fig. |
| Cnidaria – Hexacorallia – Actiniaria – Galatheanthemidae – Galatheanthemum sp. indet. 1 | JPT | 7300–7500 | Fig. |
| Cnidaria – Hydrozoa – Anthoathecata – Corymorphidae gen. indet. | JPT | 4913 | Fig. |
| Cnidaria – Hydrozoa – Anthoathecata – Corymorphidae – Branchiocerianthus sp. indet. | JPT | 8001–8022 | Fig. |
| Cnidaria – Hydrozoa – Narcomedusae – Aeginidae spp. | IOT, JPT | 6825–9773 | Fig. |
| Cnidaria – Hydrozoa – Narcomedusae spp. | JPT, RT | 5110–8000 | Fig. |
| Cnidaria – Hydrozoa – Trachymedusae – Rhopalonematidae spp. | IOT, JPT | 5459–9773 | Fig. |
| Cnidaria – Hydrozoa – Trachymedusae – Benthocodon spp. | IOT, JPT | 7183–9773 | Fig. |
| Cnidaria – Hydrozoa – Trachymedusae – Rhopalonematidae – Crossota spp. | IOT, RT | 5110–6023 | Fig. |
| Cnidaria – Hydrozoa – Trachymedusae spp. | IOT, JPT, RT | 5110–9773 | n.s. |
| Cnidaria – Hydrozoa ord. indet. | IOT, JPT | 7001–8077 | n.s. |
| Cnidaria – Hydrozoa ord. indet. 1 | IOT | 9069 | Fig. |
| Cnidaria – Scyphozoa – Coronatae fam. indet. | JPT | 5993 | Fig. |
| Ctenophora – cls. indet. | JPT | 8000 | n.s. |
| Ctenophora – Tentaculata – Cydippida fam. indet. | IOT, JPT, RT | 4534–7519 | Fig. |
| Ctenophora – Tentaculata – Cydippida fam. indet. 1 | IOT, JPT, RT | 7006–9136 | Fig. |
| Ctenophora – Tentaculata – Lobata fam. indet. | IOT, JPT, RT | 5110–6177 | Fig. |
| Ctenophora – Tentaculata – Platyctenida – Lyroctenidae gen. indet. | JPT | 7091–8001 | Fig. |
| Echinodermata – Asteroidea ord. indet. | JPT | 7453 | n.s. |
| Echinodermata – Asteroidea – Paxillosida – Porcellanasteridae gen. indet. | RT | 7309–7310 | Fig. |
| Echinodermata – Asteroidea – Velatida – Pterasteridae – Hymenaster sp. indet. | JPT | 7165–7369 | Fig. |
| Echinodermata – Crinoidea – Comatulida – Bathycrinidae – Bathycrinus sp. indet. 1 | JPT | 7121–7334 | Fig. |
| Echinodermata – Crinoidea – Comatulida – Bathycrinidae – Bathycrinus sp. indet. 2 | IOT | 8975–9736 | Fig. |
| Echinodermata – Echinoidea – Echinothurioida fam. indet. | RT | 5110 | Fig. |
| Echinodermata – Holothuroidea – Elasipodida – Elpidiidae spp. | IOT, JPT, RT | 4913–8336 | n.s. |
| Echinodermata – Holothuroidea – Elasipodida – Elpidiidae – Elpidia spp. | IOT, JPT | 6819–9745 | n.s. |
| Echinodermata – Holothuroidea – Elasipodida – Elpidiidae – Elpidia sp. indet. 1 – cf. birsteini | JPT | 7001–7311 | Fig. |
| Echinodermata – Holothuroidea – Elasipodida – Elpidiidae – Elpidia sp. indet. 2 | IOT, JPT | 7286–9037 | Fig. |
| Echinodermata – Holothuroidea – Elasipodida – Elpidiidae – Elpidia sp. indet. 3 – cf. kurilensis | IOT | 8974–9047 | Fig. |
| Echinodermata – Holothuroidea – Elasipodida – Elpidiidae – Elpidia sp. indet. 4 – cf. longicirrata | IOT | 9025–9623 | Fig. |
| Echinodermata – Holothuroidea – Elasipodida – Elpidiidae – Peniagone spp. | IOT, JPT, RT | 4913–9775 | Fig. |
| Echinodermata – Holothuroidea – Elasipodida – Elpidiidae – Peniagone sp. indet. 1 | JPT, RT | 6937–7528 | Fig. |
| Echinodermata – Holothuroidea – Elasipodida – Elpidiidae – Peniagone sp. indet. 2 | IOT, JPT | 7168–9132 | Fig. |
| Echinodermata – Holothuroidea – Elasipodida – Elpidiidae – Peniagone sp. indet. 3 | IOT | 9680–9686 | Fig. |
| Echinodermata – Holothuroidea – Pelagothuriidae – Enypniastes eximia | IOT, JPT, RT | 5110–6883 | Fig. |
| Echinodermata – Holothuroidea – Holothuriida – Mesothuriidae – Mesothuria spp. | IOT, JPT, RT | 7109–9137 | Fig. |
| Echinodermata – Holothuroidea – Persiculida – Unassigned – Benthothuria sp. indet. | IOT, JPT, RT | 5932–6824 | Fig. |
| Echinodermata – Ophiuroidea spp. | IOT, JPT, RT | 4913–7339 | Fig. |
| Foraminifera – Monothalamea spp. | IOT, JPT, RT | 6938–9762 | Fig. |
| Hemichordata – Enteropneusta – Enteropneusta incertae sedis – Torquaratoridae gen. indet. 1 | JPT | 7526–7528 | Fig. |
| Hemichordata – Enteropneusta – Enteropneusta incertae sedis – Torquaratoridae gen. indet. 2 | JPT | 6819 | Fig. |
| Mollusca – Cephalopoda – Octopoda fam. indet. | RT | 5941 | Fig. |
| Mollusca – Gastropoda – Neogastropoda – Buccinidae gen. indet. | JPT, RT | 5525–7529 | Fig. |
| Mollusca – Gastropoda ord. indet. | JPT | 7000–7370 | n.s. |
| Nemertea cls. indet. 1 | IOT, JPT, RT | 4913–8291 | Fig. |
| Nemertea cls. indet. 2 | IOT, JPT | 5445–8000 | Fig. |
| Porifera – Demospongiae – Poecilosclerida – Cladorhizidae gen. indet. | IOT | 9568–9744 | Fig. |
In total, ~ 425 h of lander video footage and ~ 35.5 h of submersible video footage was collected at the seafloor.
The total number of identified morphotaxa in the trenches was 78, of which 45 (57.6%) were in the Izu-Ogasawara Trench, 61 (78.2%) in the Japan Trench and 27 (34.6%) in the Ryukyu Trench. In addition, 30 groups with indeterminable morphotaxa numbers (‘spp’) were also included. These included groups of small individuals that swarm (e.g. Amphipoda and Mysida), groups with small indeterminable body sizes (e.g., Annelida, munnopsid Isopoda, Ophiuroidea, elasipodid Holothuroidea), individuals of groups that were often drifting too far from the camera to confidently identify (e.g., Appendicularia, Narcomedusae, Trachymedusae and Ctenophora) and other groups that are notoriously difficult to identify from images (e.g., Monothalamea). Of these 30 groups, 23 (76.6%) were in the Izu-Ogasawara Trench, 28 (93.3%) in the Japan Trench and 21 (70%) in the Ryukyu Trench. Sixteen groups (53.3%) were found in all three trenches, 10 (33.3%) in two trenches and 4 (13.3%) in a single trench. Assuming the latter 30 groups represent at least one morphotaxa each, there were a total of at least 108 across all the trenches. Of these, 34 (31.5%) were found in all three trenches, 28 (25.9%) in two of the trenches and 46 (42.6%) in just one trench. Note that the number of submersible dives and lander deployments varied across trenches, meaning these values are indicative rather than strictly representative assessment of each trench.
Of the 18 morphotaxa identified in the Annelida phylum, 15 showed morphological features that allowed identification beyond phylum level; however, three morphotaxa could not be assigned confidently beyond Annelida indet. (Fig.
Annelida. A Echiuroidea fam. indet. 1; B Echiuroidea fam. indet.; 2 C Echiuroidea fam. indet. 3; D Echiuroidea fam. indet. 6; E Annelida indet. 1; F Annelida indet. 2; G Annelida indet. 3; H Flabelligeridae spp.; I Macellicephalinae spp.; J Lepidonotopodini spp.; K Macellicephalinae gen. indet. 1; L Macellicephalinae gen. indet. 2.; M Sabellidae spp.; N Sabellidae gen. indet. 1; O Annelida spp.; P Acrocirridae spp.
Historical records show two unknown species of polynoid, Macellicephala “sp. A” and “sp. B” from 7420-7450 m on the axis and 6700-7400 m on the adjacent slope of the Japan Trench (
The Arthropoda were represented by two classes (Malacostraca and Copepoda), five orders, ten families (plus two unknown) forming 13 morphotaxa. Within the Malacostraca, five orders were observed: Amphipoda, Decapoda, Isopoda, Mysida and Tanaidacea (Fig.
Arthropoda (Malacostraca). A Alicella gigantea; B Eurythenes spp.; C Princaxelia jamiesoni; D Amphipoda spp.; E Heterogenys sp. indet. 1; F Cerataspis monstrosus; G Benthesicymus crenatus; H Munnopsidae spp.; I Rectisura herculea; J Antarcturidae gen. indet.; K Mysidae spp.; L Gigantapseudes sp.; indet.; M Copepoda spp.
In the Amphipoda order, multiple species were present within the Alicelloidea and Lysianassoidea superfamilies. Due the typically small body size of abyssal and hadal amphipods and their propensity to aggregate at baited lander in high numbers complicating identifications as well as counts, these amphipods were collectively listed here as Amphipoda spp. Known species within these trenches and these depths are Hirondellea gigas (Birstein and Vinogradov, 1955), Paralicella microps (Birstein and Vinogradov, 1958), Eurythenes gryllus (Lichtenstein in Mandt, 1822) and Bathycallisoma schellenbergi (Birstein and Vinogradov, 1958), although there are no records from the Ryukyu Trench (
The Decapoda were dominated by two species; Cerataspis monstrosus Gray 1828 (Aristeidae) between 4534 and 6692 m and Benthesicymus crenatus Spence Bate, 1881 (Benthesicymidae) between 4534 m and 7571 m (Fig.
One family-level grouping (Munnopsidae spp.) and one known species of isopod (Rectisura herculea, Birstein 1957) were observed (Fig.
Valviferan isopods (Antarcturidae gen. indet.) were seen between 7165 m and 7345 m in the Japan Trench (Fig.
Mysids (Mysidae spp.) were observed at all depths across all trenches (Fig.
In the Japan and Ryukyu trenches, the giant tanaid Gigantapseudes sp. indet. was seen between 6937 m and 7345 m in submersible videos (Fig.
Copepods of unknown order(s) were seen between 4913 m and 7621 m in the Japan and Izu-Ogasawara trenches (Fig.
The Chordata were represented by three classes: Appendicularia, Ascidiacea and Teleostei (Figs
Chordata (Teleostei). A Ilyophis sp. indet.; B Abyssoberyx sp. indet.; C Coryphaenoides armatus; D Coryphaenoides yaquinae; E Barathrites iris; F Bassozetus sp. indet. 1; G Bassozetus sp. indet. 2; H Bassozetus sp. indet. 3; I Bassozetus sp. indet. 6; J Pseudoliparis sp. indet. 1; K Pseudoliparis sp. indet. 2; L Pseudoliparis sp. indet. 3.
The bony fish (Teleostei) were represented by five orders and five families. Twelve morphospecies or species were identified following
All fish were observed by baited camera; however, the three Pseudoliparis and four Bassozetus morphospecies attended the bait to prey upon scavenging amphipods. Barathrites iris, Ilyophis sp. indet. and the two macrourids all scavenged upon the bait. Abyssoberyx sp. indet. was observed incidentally, irrespective of the bait.
The Cnidaria were represented by three classes: Hexacorallia, Hydrozoa and Scyphozoa (Figs
Actiniarians (Actinaria spp.) were observed in all three trenches between 6485 m and 9617 m. They were often too small and cryptic to assign a specific morphotaxon. Nonetheless, seven actiniarian morphotaxa were identified, mainly in the Izu-Ogasawara and Japan trenches. Morphotaxa were distinguished through consistent differences in column length and width, column diameter to oral disc ratio, whorl count and tentacle number and morphology.
Actiniaria fam. indet. 1, 2, 3, 4 and 7 were all observed at similar depth ranges in the Izu-Ogasawara and Japan trenches (7528-9775 m, 7526-9137 m, 7095-9745 m, 7082-9734 m and 7168-9136 m, respectively; Fig.
Other morphotaxa observed in the Actiniaria included Galatheanthemum sp. indet. 1 of the Galatheanthemidae family, seen between 7300 m and 7500 m in the Japan Trench (Fig.
The Hydrozoa were represented by three known orders (Anthoathecata, Narcomedusae and Trachymedusae) and one indeterminable order. Ten hydrozoan morphotaxa were identified.
Within the Anthoathecata, there were two hydrozoan morphotaxa in the Corymorphidae family: the giant hydroid Branchiocerianthus sp. indet at 8022 m and Corymorphidae gen. indet. at 4913 m, both in the Japan Trench (Fig.
The Trachymedusae Benthocodon spp. (Rhopalonematidae) were found at depths ranging from 7183 m to 9773 m in the Izu-Ogasawara and Japan trenches (Fig.
A single scyphozoan of the Coronatae order (Periphyllidae or Paraphyllinidae) was seen at 5993 m in the Japan Trench (Fig.
Ctenophores were observed in the Tentaculata class, belonging to the orders Platyctenida, Cydippida and Lobata (Fig.
The Echinodermata comprised five classes: Asteroidea, Crinoidea, Echinoidea, Holothuroidea and Ophiuroidea (Fig.
Echinodermata (Asteroidea, Crinoidea, Holothuroidea, Ophiuroidea, Echinoidea). A Porcellanasteridae gen. indet.; B Hymenaster sp. indet.; C Bathycrinus sp. indet. 1; D Bathycrinus sp. indet. 2; E Elpidia sp. indet. 1 (cf E. birsteini); F Elpidia sp. indet. 2; G Elpidia sp. indet. 3 (cf. E. kurilensis); H Elpidia sp. indet. 4 (cf. E. longicirrata); I Peniagone spp.; J Peniagone sp. indet. 1; K Peniagone sp. indet. 2; L Peniagone sp. indet. 3; M Enypniastes eximia; N-P Mesothuria spp.; Q Benthothuria sp. indet.; R Ophiuroidea spp.; S Echinothurioida fam. indet.
The class Asteroidea was represented by Porcellanasteridae gen. indet. (Fig.
Two morphotaxa of crinoids (Crinoidea) were observed, present in the Japan Trench between 7121 m and 7334 m (Bathycrinus sp. indet. 1, Fig.
The most diverse Echinodermata class were the Holothuroidea. Twenty morphotaxa spanning at least three orders and four families were observed (Note, there is currently no assigned family for the genus Benthothuria, but it is the only genus from the Persiculida order in this study and, therefore, a fourth family is assumed). The most diverse (ten morphotaxa) was the Elpidiidae family. These included four morphotaxa in the genus Elpidia: Elpidia. sp. indet. 1 (cf. birsteini) (Fig.
The only representative of the class Ophiuroidea was an indeterminable morphotype with a depth range of 4913-7339 m seen in all three trenches (Fig.
Lastly, one individual of the class Echinoidea (Echinothurioida fam. indet.) was observed and only found at 5110 m in the Ryukyu Trench (Fig.
Tentatively identified foraminifera (Monothalamea) were observed in irregular patches on the seafloor, with many clusters forming around obstacles such as rocks, metallic anthropogenic debris or wood debris (Fig.
The organisms from the Izu-Ogasawara Trench, particularly near the Boso triple junction (Fig.
In the Ryukyu Trench, patches resembling xenophyophores were observed throughout the dive, notably in areas close to and down-current from discarded metal canisters (Fig.
Additionally, in the Ryukyu Trench, an area roughly 2 m in diameter was noted where multiple evenly spaced, spherical “xenophyophores” were observed on the seafloor (Fig.
Several phyla were represented by rare observations. These included the Hemichordata, with two enteropneust morphotaxa in the Torquatoridae family observed in the Japan Trench at 7526–7528 m (Torquatoridae gen. indet. 1, Fig.
Miscellaneous (Hemichordata, Mollusca, Nemertea, Porifera, Chaetognatha, Unknown). A Torquaratoridae gen. indet. 1; B Torquaratoridae gen. indet. 2; C Octopoda fam. indet.; D Buccinidae gen. indet.; E Nemertea cls. indet. 1; F Nemertea cls. indet. 2; G Cladorhizidae gen. indet.; H Chaetognatha spp.; I Animalia incerta sedis.
The only morphotaxon identified within the Porifera phylum was a demosponge belonging to the Cladorhizidae family (Fig.
This study utilised multiple video-based observation platforms during the 2022 “Ring of Fire Expedition” to explore abyssal and hadal biodiversity in the Japanese trenches. The results reveal a high level of diversity, although many morphotaxa remain unidentified at lower taxonomic levels, indicating that species-level diversity is likely greater. Although image-based observations did not always permit confident taxon identification, the inclusion of conservatively identified records of faunal occurrence and depth limits helps establish baseline knowledge of abyssal and hadal faunal assemblages in this region. Most morphotaxa were shared across trenches, with the Japan Trench hosting the largest number of individual morphotaxa, likely due to it also being the most extensively sampled.
In addition to the established approach of baited cameras for documenting mobile fauna and exploratory vehicles for documenting sessile fauna, this study further highlights how different survey methodologies, in this case, landers and submersibles, influence both observed biodiversity and behavioural patterns. Perhaps the starkest difference are the large aggregations of scavenging amphipods that rapidly consume bait from a baited system, yet are seldom observed during a submersible dive. While baited cameras provide critical insights into mobile scavenger assemblages, they target mobile species attracted to bait. On the other hand, non-baited video transects can capture sessile and other non-bait-attending organisms across multiple habitats. In addition, larger more easily identifiable species like Princaxelia jamiesoni and mysids behave quite differently, depending on the observation method. Princaxelids are seen crawling and swimming in pursuit of smaller Lysianassoid amphipods when attending baited systems, but in non-baited video transects are easily identified sitting stationary on rocks (as on the left side of the rock in Fig.
Instances of high abundance of organisms where A and B are bathycrinids aggregated in dense groups on terraces and rocks at 9137 m at the base of the Boso triple junction; C Echiuroidea fam. indet. 6 aggregated in fissures on the fault scarp generated by the 2011 megathrust earthquake in the Japan Trench; D, E Antarcturidae gen. indet. lined up along rock edges.
These observations suggest that integrating multiple survey methods supports a holistic assessment of hadal biodiversity, as different methodologies capture different aspects of community composition and species behaviour. Comparisons with trawl sampling at these depths further underscore this. For example,
Other interesting observations relate to rarity and unusually high abundance of certain taxa. Two particularly striking examples of high abundance were recorded in the Izu-Ogasawara Trench. At the northern end, during a submersible dive to the base of the Boso triple junction at 9137 m in the northern end of the Izu-Ogasawara Trench, a dense aggregation of crinoids was observed – referred to as a "crinoid meadow" by
In contrast, substrate instability following disturbance events can also shape species aggregation patterns. An example is the dense aggregations of echiuroids on the floor of various fissures on the fault scarp generated by the 2011 Tohoku-Oki earthquake (
Valviferan isopods (Antarcturidae gen. indet.) were only observed lined up along the acute edges of rocky outcrops (Fig.
In the case of rarities, across the entire dataset of ~ 460 h of footage, some whole phyla or classes were represented by just one individual, for example Enteropneusta, Octopoda and Echinoidea. While acknowledging that highly mobile Octopoda may be elusive due to vehicle avoidance, as well as potentially low in abundance, the other phyla are slow-moving epibenthic groups that should exhibit no known avoidance behaviour to sampling gear and, therefore, are likely to be extremely low in abundance. Their presence is only known from collecting a large amount of footage.
In the case of both rare and peculiar, there were at least two instances of snailfish in the Japan Trench that appeared to lack eyes (Fig.
Another example highlighting the importance of physical sampling for definitive taxonomic classification is the identification challenge posed by an unknown metazoan of uncertain phylum, designated here as Animalia incerta sedis (Fig.
This imagery-based guide, integrating video data from multiple platforms, provides a baseline for understanding megafaunal biodiversity at abyssal and hadal depths in the Japan, Ryukyu and Izu-Ogasawara trenches, with particular attention given to the 2011 earthquake epicentre site in the Japan Trench and the base of the Boso triple Junction in the Izu-Ogasawara Trench. The provided images, observational notes and species depth ranges are intended to support future campaigns by providing a reference for future biodiversity studies, including those focused on targeted specimen collection and formal taxonomic classification.
We thank the Captain, crew, sub team, science team and company of the DSSV Pressure Drop on the Japan ‘Ring of Fire’ Expeditions and EYOS Expeditions for their support at sea. We thank the following for the taxonomic assistance: Natsumi Hookabe, Hiromi K. Watanabe (JAMSTEC, Japan), Akito Ogawa, (National Museum of Nature and Science, Japan), Philippe Bouchet (Paris Museum of Natural History, Paris), Leopoldo Moro (Government of Canary Islands), Trond Roger Oskars (Møreforsking, Norway), Christopher Mah (Smithsonian Institution, USA), Gary Poore (Museums Victoria), Brett Gonzalez, Alfredo Marchiò and Javier Montenegro (University of Western Australia).
The expeditions were funded by Inkfish (USA) and Caladan Oceanic LLC (USA). HK was funded by the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JSPS; No. 20H02013) and by the Danish National Research Foundation (DNRF145). UWA staff time was funded by the Minderoo Foundation, Australia (AJ and TB) and Inkfish, USA (DS, MC, and MS).
This work was undertaken with permission from the Japanese Ministry of Foreign Affairs and Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries, with permits (Mofa Note Verbale, #AO877 and certificate for Catching Marine Animals and Plants #022. This research and its sampling methods were approved by the Animal Ethics Committee at The University of Western Australia (2022/ET00005).