|
Biodiversity Data Journal :
Short Communication
|
|
Corresponding author: Jiang Zhou (zhoujiang@ioz.ac.cn)
Academic editor: Gerson Paulino Lopes
Received: 14 May 2026 | Accepted: 18 Sep 2026 | Published: 02 Oct 2026
© 2026 Lin Li, Hongbo Li, Chang Luo, Fanmiao Zhou, Zhonglian Wang, Qiuxia Wang, Zifa Zhao, Jiang Zhou
This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Citation:
Li L, Li H, Luo C, Zhou F, Wang Z, Wang Q, Zhao Z, Zhou J (2026) The distribution and population structure of two macaque species in Xizang, China. Biodiversity Data Journal 14: e199726. https://doi.org/10.3897/BDJ.14.e199726
|
|
Xizang, China, has complex alpine ecosystems and supports a diversity of primates. However, systematic survey data on the current distribution and population characteristics of the white-cheeked macaque (Macaca leucogenys) and the Arunachal macaque (Macaca munzala) in Xizang remain limited. To determine the spatial distributions and troop sizes of the two macaque species, line-transect surveys and camera-trap monitoring were conducted in Shannan City and Nyingchi City, Xizang, in 2025. The surveys recorded 11 troops of Arunachal macaques in Himalayan fir forests and forest-edge habitats at elevations of 2,000–3,000 m in Cona City, Shannan City and 10 troops of white-cheeked macaques in habitats, ranging from evergreen broad-leaved forest to mixed coniferous–broad-leaved forest at elevations of 1,395–2,700 m in Gedang Township and Damu Township, Medog County, Nyingchi City. Average troop size was approximately 14 individuals for the Arunachal macaque and 17 individuals for the white-cheeked macaque. Troops of both species included adults, subadults and infants and the presence of infants indicated normal reproductive activity. This study provides the first systematic documentation of the current distribution ranges, habitat preferences and social structure of these two macaque species in Xizang, thereby providing baseline data for subsequent conservation assessments and management decisions.
new distribution records, primates, Arunachal macaque, white-cheeked macaque, rare and endangered species
More than 60% of primates worldwide are threatened by habitat loss, climate change and human activities and accurate assessments of their populations and distributions are a prerequisite for developing conservation strategies (
The Arunachal macaque (Macaca munzala) and white-cheeked macaque (M. leucogenys) are two new macaque species described successively from the eastern Himalayas in the 21st century. The Arunachal macaque was named in 2005 and is characterised by a pale yellow crown patch, centrally whorled black hair and dark stripes above the eyes (
In view of these critical information gaps, systematic surveys of the Arunachal macaque and white-cheeked macaque were conducted in south-eastern Xizang from April to September 2025. This period coincides with the post-parturition lactation and infant-following stages of Macaca species, when infants are readily identifiable and reproductive parameters can be recorded more easily (
The study area is located in south-eastern Xizang Autonomous Region, at the tectonic bend near the eastern end of the Himalayas, where deep incision by the Yarlung Zangbo River has formed a massive canyon. The terrain is high in the northwest and low in the southeast, with extreme vertical relief and a complete vertical zonation from alpine snow and ice to tropical monsoon forest at lower elevations. The study area encompasses Nyingchi City (Bayyi District and selected townships in Medog and Zayu counties) and the southern valley zone of Cona County, Shannan City (Fig. A in Fig.
Camera-trap monitoring and transect surveys were conducted concurrently. A total of 120 functional camera-trap stations were established using the “Yianweishi L810G Full-Network” infrared-triggered monitoring unit manufactured by Qingdao Yianweishi Technology Co., Ltd. (IP68 protection; equipped with infrared/LED illuminators and a passive infrared sensor; automatically triggers photographs or video when infrared signals are detected within the effective sensing range; suitable for scientific field surveys and long-term biodiversity monitoring). Camera stations were preferentially established near water sources, on animal trails and in accessible areas with clear signs of animal activity (tracks, feeding signs or faeces). Stratified sampling was used to cover major habitat types, including forest and shrubland, while a 1 km x 1 km grid constrained the overall distribution of stations to reduce bias (infrared cameras and transects are shown in the B section of Fig.
Based on the independent records, two observers independently classified the species, sex and age class of animals in the photographs and videos. Species were identified from external morphology, pelage colour, facial features and body size; sex was determined from external genitalia, nipples, body size and facial sexual characteristics; and age was classified as adult, subadult or infant. Agreement between the two observers was evaluated using Cohen's κ (
To supplement the limited ability of camera traps to detect highly mobile individuals and macaque troops in blind spots and to cross-validate data reliability, 22 transects were established concurrently. Each transect was 5 km long and 30 m wide, extending 15 m on each side of the center line. Stratified random sampling covered habitat types, including forest, shrubland and exposed rock. A minimum distance of 500 m between transects prevented spatial overlap and transect routes avoided animal trails and human paths whenever possible to reduce detection bias. From April to September 2025, each transect was surveyed once per month, for a total of 132 surveys and an effective cumulative transect distance of 660 km (detailed survey effort by region and species is provided in Supplementary Table S1). Surveys were conducted 2-4 h after sunrise and 2-4 h before sunset to cover peak periods of primate activity (
Signs were identified according to the morphological descriptions of Macaca species in A Guide to the Mammals of China (
In this study, a “troop” was defined as a social unit composed of multiple individuals moving, foraging or resting together at close distances (≤ 50 m) within a given spatial and temporal range and exhibiting coordinated behavior (
Not all individuals were uniquely marked and neither spatial capture-recapture nor distance-sampling density estimation was used. Accordingly, the reported values represent the “minimum number of individuals observed” (MOI), rather than absolute population size (
The survey recorded 11 independent confirmed occurrence sites for SXM, all concentrated in the Lebu Valley area of Cona City, Shannan City, Xizang Autonomous Region (as shown by the diamond in Fig.
Schematic diagram of distribution sites of the two macaque species. Diamonds represent *Macaca munzala*, triangles represent *Macaca leucogenys*, red indicates historical GBIF occurrence records and blue indicates sites recorded in the present survey. Historical GBIF records are current as of April 2025.
According to the definition of “stable distribution” used in this study — a species has continuous or regular occurrence records within a specific area, together with populations capable of carrying out essential life activities, such as reproduction and foraging — the survey obtained the following concurrent evidence in the Lebu Valley area: (a) multiple spatially dispersed and independent occurrence sites (n = 11), indicating that the species was not merely an occasional visitor to the area; (b) multiple troop records that included infants, indicating normal reproductive activity by SXM in the area; and (c) spatially continuous sign records that corroborated the troops' activity ranges. Together, these results show that SXM has a continuous distribution in the Lebu Valley area and that populations capable of reproduction and other essential life activities are present.
The survey recorded 10 independent confirmed occurrence sites for WCM, mainly concentrated near Gangrigabu Mountain in Gedang Township and around the 80K locality in Damu Township, Medog County, Nyingchi City, Xizang Autonomous Region (as shown by the triangle in Fig.
Camera traps and transect surveys yielded 10 independent WCM troop records: six troops were photographed by camera traps and four were directly observed during transect surveys. Transect surveys also recorded nine WCM signs, including faeces and footprints. The sign locations were spatially clustered and matched the spatial pattern of the camera-trap records and direct sightings. According to the definition of “stable distribution” used in this study, the survey obtained the following evidence in Medog County: (a) 10 spatially independent occurrence sites covering two geographic sectors, Gedang Township and Damu Township; (b) infants in multiple troop records, indicating ongoing reproductive activity; and (c) continuous sign records around the occurrence sites, supporting regular activity by the species in these areas. These results indicate that WCM has a continuous distribution within Medog County and that populations capable of reproduction, foraging and other essential life activities are present.
In this study, the sex of adult individuals was determined from two independent types of evidence: (1) direct visual identification by observers during field transect surveys, based on external genitalia, body size and facial sexual characteristics; and (2) camera-trap photographs or videos that clearly showed the genital region or typical maternal behavior, such as nursing or carrying an infant. Accordingly, all individuals observed carrying infants were classified as adult females. It should be emphasized that the number of infants provides a conservative lower bound for the number of adult females, rather than an exact estimate. This inference assumes that not every adult female was carrying an infant during the survey period, because some females were not in a reproductive period, had not conceived or had offspring that were already independent. The actual number of adult females may, therefore, exceed the number of infants recorded. In addition, sex determination of adults was constrained by image clarity, camera angle and individual posture and the sex of some individuals could not be determined reliably.
In the Lebu Valley area of Cona City, Shannan City, the survey recorded 11 independent SXM troops (Table
Table 1. Population information for the Arunachal macaque and white-cheeked macaque in Xizang, China.
|
Survey ID |
Elevation |
Location |
Troop size |
Total |
Habitat type |
Data source |
|||
|
Adult males |
Adult females |
Juveniles |
Infants |
||||||
|
Arunachal macaque |
|||||||||
|
1 |
2739 m |
Cona City, Shannan City |
2 |
6-8 |
3 |
2 |
13-15 |
Deciduous broad-leaved forest |
Transect survey |
|
2 |
2839 m |
4 |
9-11 |
6 |
2 |
21-23 |
Deciduous broad-leaved forest |
Transect survey |
|
|
3 |
2467 m |
3 |
12-14 |
5 |
1 |
21-23 |
Deciduous broad-leaved forest |
Transect survey |
|
|
4 |
2708 m |
2-4 |
14 |
8 |
4 |
28-30 |
Deciduous broad-leaved forest |
Transect survey |
|
|
5 |
2411 m |
2-4 |
12 |
6 |
4 |
24-26 |
Shrubland |
Camera trap |
|
|
6 |
3228 m |
1 |
3 |
2 |
2 |
8 |
Deciduous broad-leaved forest |
Camera trap |
|
|
7 |
2953 m |
3 |
6-8 |
4 |
3 |
16-18 |
Deciduous broad-leaved forest |
Camera trap |
|
|
8 |
2830 m |
2 |
5 |
3 |
2 |
12 |
Shrubland |
Camera trap |
|
|
9 |
2868 m |
2 |
10 |
2-4 |
1 |
15-17 |
Coniferous forest |
Camera trap |
|
|
10 |
2891 m |
1 |
Coniferous forest |
Camera trap |
|||||
|
11 |
2934 m |
3 |
Deciduous broad-leaved forest |
Camera trap |
|||||
|
White-cheeked macaque |
|||||||||
|
12 |
2565 m |
Damu Township, Medog County |
3 |
7 |
1 |
2 |
13 |
Montane evergreen broad-leaved forest |
Transect survey |
|
13 |
2010 m |
2 |
4-6 |
4 |
3 |
13-15 |
Camera trap |
||
|
14 |
2141 m |
Gedang Township, Medog County |
3 |
3-6 |
3 |
2 |
11-14 |
Transect survey |
|
|
15 |
2746 m |
1 |
1 |
2 |
Camera trap |
||||
|
16 |
2651 m |
7 |
18 |
15-17 |
3 |
43-45 |
Camera trap |
||
|
17 |
2133 m |
3 |
6-7 |
2 |
3 |
14-15 |
Camera trap |
||
|
18 |
2672 m |
3 |
4-6 |
2 |
1 |
10-12 |
Camera trap |
||
|
19 |
2999 m |
2 |
4-7 |
2 |
2 |
10-13 |
Camera trap |
||
|
20 |
2275 m |
5 |
7-9 |
10 |
3 |
25-27 |
Camera trap |
||
|
21 |
2265 m |
2 |
4-6 |
3 |
4 |
13-15 |
Camera trap |
||
In the areas around Gangrigabu Mountain in Gedang Township and the 80K locality in Damu Township, Medog County, Nyingchi City, 10 independent WCM troops were recorded (Table
This systematic field survey obtained the first conclusive distribution records of SXM and WCM in the Xizang Autonomous Region and clarified their spatial distribution patterns and key habitat characteristics. SXM preferred montane Himalayan fir forests at elevations of 2,000-3,000 m, whereas WCM occurred widely in mid-elevation humid evergreen broad-leaved forests, deciduous broad-leaved forests and mixed coniferous broad-leaved forests. These results advance previous inferences, based on limited specimens or indirect information into a documented account of current distribution and provide a data foundation for subsequent population assessments and conservation planning.
The systematic implementation of this survey and the acquisition of precise distribution data for the two macaque species were made possible by recent improvements in field-monitoring conditions and advances in conservation work in Xizang. These distribution records reflect enhanced biodiversity conservation and monitoring capacity in the region and also suggest that, since the promulgation of the Wildlife Protection Law, populations previously overlooked because of limited survey coverage are being re-discovered and effectively protected. However, this study was based on a single year of surveys and, therefore, presents distribution ranges and relative abundance only as a current temporal snapshot; the data are insufficient to infer long-term temporal stability. Accordingly, the term “stable distribution” is strictly limited to the operational definition specified in the Methods: sustained records of demonstrable reproductive and foraging activity within the survey area, rather than a judgement about long-term population trends. The survey did not incorporate a time series or a comparative experimental design and any inference regarding population trends or attribution to external factors would exceed the available evidence.
Despite these limitations, the findings have clear conservation implications. Both macaque species are endangered, have relatively narrow distributions and face a real threat from habitat fragmentation. Their habitats also span the transition between subtropical and tropical climatic zones, making them ideal models for studying the evolution of high-elevation adaptation and socioecological strategies in primates. We therefore recommend prioritising the establishment of conservation areas or conservation sites within the core distribution areas so that an “umbrella effect” can benefit sympatric rare plants and animals and rapidly establish a long-term monitoring system that encompasses population dynamics, habitat quality and disturbance factors. These measures are both an urgent current conservation need and a regional reference for the conservation of montane primates worldwide; their effectiveness should be evaluated with subsequent monitoring data.
We would like to extend our sincere gratitude once again to the forestry departments of Nyingchi City and Shannan City for their strong support, as well as to the research team members for their hard work in the field.
This study was supported by Grant No. 2022YFF1301502 from the National Key Research and Development Program of China, under the project “Research on Conservation and Restoration Technologies for Rare and Endangered Flagship Animals and Small Populations,” specifically Sub-project 2: “Processes and Mechanisms of Endangerment in Endangered Flagship Animals,” as well as by the project “Investigation on the Species Distribution of White-cheeked Macaques and Arunachal Macaques in the Border Areas of Tibet.”
All authors declare no potential conflicts of interest, financial or otherwise, related to the research presented in this manuscript. The funding body (if any, for example, "Survey of the Distribution of Macaca munzala and Macaca leucogenys with in Xizang Border Regions") had no role in the design of the study, collection, analysis or interpretation of data, writing of the manuscript or decision to publish the results.