Biodiversity Data Journal :
Taxonomic paper
|
Corresponding author:
Academic editor: Paulo Borges
Received: 12 Jan 2015 | Accepted: 05 Mar 2015 | Published: 11 Mar 2015
© 2015 Varpu Vahtera, Jyrki Muona, Ari Linna, Ilari Sääksjärvi
This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Citation:
Vahtera V, Muona J, Linna A, Sääksjärvi I (2015) Nine genera of Eucnemidae (Coleoptera) new to Peru, with a key to Peruvian genera. Biodiversity Data Journal 3: e4493. https://doi.org/10.3897/BDJ.3.e4493
|
Thirteen genera of Eucnemidae containing forty species were collected from the Iquitos region in Peru. Nine of the genera are new to the country: Rhagomicrus Fleutiaux, 1902, Adelorhagus Horn, 1890, Adelothyreus Chevrolat, 1867, Microrhagus Dejean, 1833, Dyscharachthis Blackburn, 1900, Heterotaxis Bonvouloir, 1871, Spinifornax Fleutiaux, 1926, Serrifornax Fleutiaux, 1926 and Maelodrus Fleutiaux, 1928. The previous eucnemid record from Peru contained eleven species in ten genera. Only one of the forty species caught, Entomophthalmus americanus Bonvouloir, was previously known and described from the country. Dyscharachthis, Maelodrus and Adelorhagus are recorded from South America for the first time. Many of the collected species seem to favor white-sand forest as their habitat. Possible reasons for this are discussed. A list of eucnemids from Peru is included, containing taxa already recorded from the country and also taxa that are likely to occur there. A key to the Peruvian genera is included.
Neotropics, Amazon, Elateroidea, eucnemid, lowland, rain forest, white-sand forest, taxonomy, species richness.
Eucnemidae is a species rich (185 genera, 1700 species) mainly tropical beetle family, characterized by numerous undescribed species. Studies investigating the abundance of eucnemid beetles are rare, but the few that exist conclude that the family forms a significant portion of the beetle biodiversity in tropical forests (
As is commonly the case in locations with a high diversity, the eucnemid fauna of Peru is still poorly known. Previously, only eleven species belonging to ten genera were reported from the country. In this study we investigate the diversity of eucnemid beetles in Peru as well as discuss the effect that forests growing on white-sand have on the diversity of the group.
The main non-inundated lowland rain forest types in the Peruvian Amazon can be roughly divided into two groups based on the soil they grow on. “Traditional rain forests” are normally forests growing on clayey soil characterized by large trees and vines that form a shady and moist habitat for a rich flora and fauna. In contrast, forests growing on white quartz sand form nutrient-poor habitats that are not preferred by most animals because of their harshness. These forests are called varillal and chamizal in Peru (
Large white-sand areas are known to occur in tropical Asia, Guyana and Brazil (
The study was conducted in 1998 and 2000 in the National Reserve of Allpahuayo Mishana (NRAM, 3°57'S, 73°26'W), near the densely populated city of Iquitos (Department of Loreto, Peru). NRAM is famous for its high tropical rain forest habitat heterogeneity, high levels of endemism and extreme species richness (
Sampling was conducted using Malaise traps in five areas containing similar kinds of non-inundated rain forest types (see
Specimens were identified by JM. Part of the collected and identified material will be delivered to the Museum of Natural History, University of San Marcos, Lima, Peru where it will form part of the reference collection on Peruvian eucnemids. The rest of the material is deposited at the Finnish Museum of Natural History, Finland, where it is curated by JM. The new species will be described in connection of generic revisions of global scope.
One undescribed species was recorded from clay soil forest (Suppl. material
An undescribed species was caught in white-sand forest (Suppl. material
This is the only species found in our study that was previously known from Peru (
An undescribed species represented by two individuals was found in both forest types (Suppl. material
An undescribed species found in both forest types (Suppl. material
An undescribed species found from both forest types (Suppl. material
An undescribed species found from both forest types (Suppl. material
An undescribed species found from white-sand forest (Suppl. material
An undescribed species found from white-sand forest (Suppl. material
An undescribed species found from white-sand forest (Suppl. material
An undescribed species was found from white-sand forest (Suppl. material
The first record of this genus from Peru. One undescribed species was caught in both forest types (Suppl. material
Weyrauchiella peruviana Cobos, 1972 was described from Tingo Maria, Rio Huallaga, a limestone mountain range area in Peru (
An undescribed species was caught in a white-sand site (Suppl. material
An undescribed species found in white-sand forest (Suppl. material
An undescribed species was caught in both forest types (Suppl. material
The genus was not found in our study. Previously one species, Ceratogonys spinicornis Fabricius, 1801, is reported from Peru (
An undescribed species was found from both forest types (Suppl. material
An undescribed species was caught in white-sand forest (Suppl. material
An undescribed species was caught in clayey forest (Suppl. material
An undescribed species found in a white-sand site (Suppl. material
An undescribed species was found in a white-sand site (Suppl. material
An undescribed species caught in both forest types (Suppl. material
An undescribed species was caught in a clayey forest site (Suppl. material
An undescribed species caught in a white-sand site (Suppl. material
An undescribed species caught in a clayey forest site (Suppl. material
An undescribed species was caught in white-sand forest (Suppl. material
An undescribed species caught in white-sand forest (Suppl. material
An undescribed species caught in white-sand forest (Suppl. material
An undescribed species caught in both forest types (Suppl. material
An undescribed species caught in white-sand forest (Suppl. material
An undescribed species was caught in both forest types (Suppl. material
An undescribed species was caught in a white-sand site (Suppl. material
A single individual of an undescribed species was caught in a white-sand site (Suppl. material
A single individual of an undescribed species was caught in a clayey forest site (Suppl. material
A single individual of an undescribed species was caught in a clayey forest site (Suppl. material
An undescribed species was caught in both forest types (Suppl. material
The genus was not found in our study. Preiviously one species, Gagatellus baeri Fleutiaux, 1912, is reported from Peru (
This is the first record of this genus from Peru. A single individual of an undescribed species was caught in a white-sand site (Suppl. material
Not found in our study, but an undescribed species is previously known from Peru (JM collection).
One individual caught in a white-sand site (Suppl. material
We did not find this genus in our study. One species (Nematodes peruvianus Cobos, 1964) is known from Peru (
An undescribed species with individuals caught in both forest types was recorded in our study (Suppl. material
This is the first record of this genus from Peru. A single individual of an undescribed species was caught in a white-sand site (Suppl. material
This is the first record of this genus from Peru. A single individual of an undescribed species was caught in a white-sand site (Suppl. material
A key to eucnemid genera of Peru The genera reported either earlier or in this study are shown in bold. The key also includes genera that are still undiscovered in Peru, but likely to be found there because they are known from the surrounding region (shown in italics only). |
||
1 | Antennomeres 9-11 elongated, 8 clearly shorter and narrower than 9 | 2 |
– | Antennomeres 9-11 not enlarged, 8 about as long and wide as 9 | 3 |
2 | Antennomeres 9-11 serrate or pectinate in males, females larger than 15 mm | Phlegon |
– | Antennomeres 9-11 neither serrate nor pectinate, females smaller than 15 mm | Ceratogonys |
3 | Hypomera with basally closed lateral antennal grooves forming deep basal pockets for reception of antennae (Fig. |
4 |
– | Hypomera either simple (Fig. |
7 |
4 | Clypeus very wide and short, distance between the antennal insertion points 6-10 times the distance from the lower edge of the antennal insertion point to the edge | Bossionus |
– | Clypeus much narrower, the width at most 4.5 times the height | 5 |
5 | Hypomera with pit-like hairy excretory organs (Fig. |
Idiotarsus |
– | Hypomera without such structures | 6 |
6 | Head simple, frons and clypeus without keels | Entomosatopus |
– | Frons and/or clypeus with sharp keels | Dyscharachthis |
7 | Lateral pronotal ridge minutely serrate (Fig. |
8 |
– | Lateral pronotal ridge smooth | 15 |
8 | Elytral suture forming a beak before the apex in lateral view (Fig. |
Arrhipis |
– | Elytral apex evenly curved to end in lateral view | 9 |
9 | Combined length of antennomeres 2 and 3 less than the length of 4 | Entomophthalmus |
– | Combined length of antennomeres 2 and 3 always distinctly greater than the length of 4 | 10 |
10 | Metacoxal plates approximately parallel-sided (Fig. |
11 |
– | Metacoxal plates distinctly wider close to the insertion point of the trochanter than on the sides (Fig. |
14 |
11 | Antennal grooves parallel-sided, always well defined, body parallel-sided, antennae feebly serrate, often elongated | Rhagomicrus |
– | Antennal grooves either entirely absent or widening caudad, poorly delimited | 12 |
12 | Antennomeres dentate, body uniformly yellow | Adelorhagus |
– | Antennomeres 4-10 serrate or pectinate, dorsum dark or bicoloured | 13 |
13 | Pronotum unusually large compared to the rest of the body, body front-heavy in appearance, pronotum black, elytra sometimes with pale spots | Adelothyreus |
– | Dorsum black, pronotum and elytral longitudinal stripes yellow | Weyrauchiella |
14 | Width of the frons between antennal sockets less than half the distance between the eyes, usually distinctly less, body usually black or dark brown, male protarsomere 1 with an apical sex comb | Microrhagus |
– | Width of the frons between antennal sockets at least half the distance between the eyes, usually distinctly more, body evenly yellowish brown, male protarsomere 1 without any spine comb | Golbachia |
15 | Hypomera without medially defined antennal grooves (Fig. |
16 |
– | Hypomera with medially sharply defined basally open lateral antennal grooves (Fig. |
21 |
16 | Mandibles slender | Monrosina |
– | Mandibles stout with a secondary basal tooth | 17 |
17 | Meso- and metatibiae without spine combs on lateral surfaces, male protarsomere 1 simple | 18 |
– | Meso- and metatibiae with spine combs, male protarsomere 1 with a basal sex comb (Fig. |
19 |
18 | Antennomeres 3-10 deeply serrate or flabellate | Calyptocerus |
– | Antennomeres 3-10 tubular, neither serrate nor flabellate | Paraxylophilus |
19 | Frons usually conspicuously flattened, antennomeres 6-10 slightly enlarged and flattened, 6 always longer and usually wider than 5, 3-10 not serrate | Nematodes |
– | Frons convex, antennomere 5 usually similar in size to 6, antennomeres 3-10 dentate, serrate or tubular, protibiae with simple apexes | 20 |
20 | Dorsum shiny or very shiny, at most densely punctate, brownish | Plesiofornax |
– | Dorsum extremely dull, very densely and strongly rugose, black | Gagatellus |
21 | Elytral epipleura grooved, smooth and shiny basally | Serrifornax |
– | Elytral epipleura even, not grooved in front | 22 |
22 | Abdominal tip excavated, bifid | Maelodrus |
– | Abdominal tip pointed or rounded | 23 |
23 | Antennal grooves large in volume, wider than rest of hypomera | Macraulacus |
– | Antennal grooves much narrower than rest of hypomera (Fig. |
24 |
24 | Elytra with sharply marked, punctate striae (Fig. |
Heterotaxis |
– | Elytral striae faint, never punctate, elytra rarely parallel-sided in shape | 25 |
25 | Claws with basal teeth | Fornax |
– | Claws simple | Dromaeolus |
Since the traps were placed in two different forest types (three traps in white-sand forest and two in forest growing on clayey soil in each area), the average number of species and individuals that each trap collected was calculated. A species accumulation curve was calculated using EstimateS (
The total sample size was 185 malaise trap months, which presents one of the largest insect samples ever collected in the western Amazon by Malaise trapping. The material contained 40 eucnemid species belonging to 13 genera; 39 of the species were undescribed. Nine of the collected genera have never been reported from Peru before. Two genera are new to South America as a whole (Adelorhagus, Maelodrus), and one (Dyscharachthis) has only been reported there in passing in a more general context (
The few studies that have sampled eucnemid diversity (
We have shown that by conducting a biodiversity survey in one area in the Peruvian Amazon, we were able to double the number of genera and quadruple the number of species reported from the country. However, despite our sampling being intensive and long-term (185 Malaise trap months in total), it was nowhere near sufficient to record most eucnemid species present in the sampled area. This is indicated by the species accumulation curve showing no sign of stabilizing. Also, the number of rare species remained high throughout the sampling which further indicates the presence of numerous undiscovered species (
Two of the genera reported here (Maelodrus and Adelothyreus) have never been collected from South America before: Adelothyreus is known from Central America (Costa Rica, unpublished; Panama, loc. class.) but the closest reported occurrences of the genus Maelodrus are from Western Polynesia and Australia. Furthermore, although the existence of Dyscharachthis in South America was briefly noted by
Many of the new species obtained in this study were caught in study sites located in white-sand forest (see habitats in Figs
Another explanation for the high eucnemid diversity in white-sand forest stems from the geological history of the white-sands. White-sand forests in the geologically more stable Central and Eastern Amazon may have been more persistent and extensive than the geologically recently formed and isolated white-sand patches in the western Amazon (
Though eucnemid species are mostly characterized by having a relatively small body size, there are also large-sized taxa, of which e.g. the genus Phlegon occurs in the Brazilian Amazon. Interestingly, all the species collected in this study are small, 2-8 mm in length. This may just be a matter of low sampling efficiency or alternatively it may reflect the fact that white-sand forest trees are commonly thin (most tree trunks less than 20 cm in diameter). The latter alternative cannot be the sole explanation, however, since clay soil forest also had only small eucnemids despite the presence of large trees.
We thank the following institutions for helping us in numerous ways during the study: Universidad Nacional de la Amazonía Peruana, UNAP (Peru), Instituto Nacional de Recursos Naturales, INRENA (Peru), Instituto de Investigaciones de la Amazonía Peruana, IIAP (Peru), Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agraria, INIA (Peru), Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos (Peru), Finnish School in Wildlife Biology, Conservation and Management (LUOVA), Biological Interactions Graduate School, University of Turku (Finland), Academy of Finland, Entomological Society of Finland, Entomologiska föreningen i Helsingfors. José Alvarez, Mario Escobedo, Gerardo Lamas, Teotista Mafaldo, Manuel Reategui, Pedro Ramirez, Sandra Rios, Pekka Soini, and the villagers in Mishana helped us with the sampling. Jukka Salo and Matti Räsänen gave valuable comments during various phases of the work. We thank Tapani Hopkins for kindly checking the language.
VV Wrote the paper, participated in identifications and conducted the analyses.
JM Participated in writing the paper, identified the material, made the identification key and took the SEM pictures.
AL Participated in writing the paper.
IES Collected the material and participated in writing the paper.
Data showing the number of specimens / species collected by each trap.