Biodiversity Data Journal :
Data Paper (Biosciences)
|
Corresponding author: Alexey P. Seregin (botanik.seregin@gmail.com)
Academic editor: Vincent Smith
Received: 11 Aug 2020 | Accepted: 06 Oct 2020 | Published: 23 Oct 2020
© 2020 Alexey Seregin, Nina Stepanova
This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Citation:
Seregin AP, Stepanova NYu (2020) MHA Herbarium: Eastern European collections of vascular plants. Biodiversity Data Journal 8: e57512. https://doi.org/10.3897/BDJ.8.e57512
|
|
World herbaria with 387.5M specimens (
MHA Herbarium imaged 64,008 specimens from Moscow Region and partly from other regions of Eastern Europe at 600 dpi and provided key metadata. These data are now fully available in the Moscow Digital Herbarium and GBIF. Complete georeferencing of the specimens from the City of Moscow was a key task in 2020. As of May 2020, 50,324 specimens, including 49,732 specimens from Russia, have been georeferenced (78.6%) and 39,448 specimens have fully-captured label transcriptions (61.6%). Based on these data, we give a detailed overview of the collections including spatial, temporal and taxonomic description of the dataset.
occurrence, specimen, herbarium, database, digitisation, georeferencing, collections
The official name of the collection is the Skvortsov Herbarium of the Main Botanical Garden, Russian Academy of Sciences (acronym MHA). In 2020, the Herbarium was named after the well-known Russian botanist Alexey Konstantinovich Skvortsov (1920–2008), who was the scientific supervisor of the MHA Herbarium for 36 years.
The Herbarium was launched soon after the founding of the Main Botanical Garden of the Academy of Sciences of the USSR in 1945. Initially, some minor collections of dry plants were stored in workrooms of the staff. In 1958, the Herbarium received a hall of 280 m2 in the newly-constructed main lab building. A group headed by V.N. Voroshilov formed the herbarium staff. Upon formal establishment, the MHA Herbarium received an almost complete set of exsiccates “Herbarium of the Flora of the USSR” from the Komarov Botanical Institute (Leningrad) and all botanical collections from the Timiryazev Institute of Plant Physiology (Moscow), including duplicates of important Moscow collections by D.P. Syreyshchikov, the first curator of the Moscow University Herbarium. These initial holdings were supplemented by the collections from Voronezh and Moscow Oblasts by V.N. Voroshilov, B.M. Kulkov and V.A. Shtamm (
In 1966, A.K. Skvortsov became the scientific supervisor of the MHA Herbarium. The main vectors of the Herbarium development were formed in this time: “Our collections should provide:
The location of the herbarium in the center of European Russia obliges us to create a regional herbarium” (
Some Russian-language references describe the main milestones in the history of the MHA Herbarium (
Number of specimens |
Proportion (%) |
Mean annual growth (2014–2019) |
|
Eastern Europe |
101,034 |
16.4 |
1,873 |
Moscow region |
49,621 |
8.1 |
1,730 |
Crimea |
17,915 |
2.9 |
24 |
Caucasus |
52,553 |
8.5 |
202 |
Siberia and plains of Kazakhstan |
60,903 |
9.9 |
691 |
Russian Far East |
63,560 |
10.3 |
36 |
Middle Asia |
52,557 |
8.5 |
389 |
General Herbarium |
115,893 |
18.8 |
746 |
Herbarium of Introduction |
23,981 |
3.9 |
213 |
Dendrological Herbarium |
30,000 |
4.9 |
0 |
Type collection |
1,424 |
0.3 |
0.5 |
Skvortsov’s personal herbarium |
45,782 |
7.4 |
0 |
All vascular plants: |
615,223 |
100 |
5,906 |
Bryophytes |
70,000 |
ca. 2,000 |
|
Lichens (since 2019) |
500 |
500 |
|
Total: |
ca. 685,700 |
The Herbarium of vascular plants is located in two halls (334 m2) in the main lab building of the Garden. Duplicates and unmounted backlog are stored in several rooms (120 m2) at Botanicheskaya Street, 33-4 within a ten minute walk from the main building. The Herbarium of bryophytes is also stored at Botanicheskaya Street, 33-4 in several rooms (180 m2).
Currently, the MHA Herbarium has 12 staff members (of which six are working with vascular plants). There are eight curators and researchers, a mounter and three employees who are digitising and filing the specimens. The staff members conduct field research across Russia in Tver, Tula, Kaluga, Belgorod, Rostov, Saratov, Volgograd, Orenburg Oblasts, Kalmykia, Dagestan, Ingushetia, Stavropol Krai, Yakutia etc. The total duration of expeditions is ca. 240 person-days per year. Fresh collections by the employees form 70% of new accessions. Other accessions come from exchange, gifts and old backlog.
Recent digitisation activities in Moscow and Eastern European sections allow us to detail the list of collectors, the time and place of their work, the number of the collected specimens and their taxonomic composition.
1. Moscow section holds 49,621 specimens and covers two subjects of the Russian Federation—the City of Moscow and Moscow Oblast. The section is completely imaged and curated as a separate unit due to the geographical location of the Herbarium and high intensity of field research in the area.
2. Eastern European section covers plant collections from European Russia, the Urals, the Baltic countries, Belarus, Ukraine, Moldova and Western Kazakhstan (west of the Ural River). The section does not include Moscow Region, the Caucasus and the Crimea. Today, the section contains 101,034 specimens, incl. 14,288 imaged specimens (14.1%). Thus, statistics on taxonomic and temporal coverage, collectors and collection dates for this section are based on a 14-percent sample that covers pteridophytes, conifers and most monocots.
"Flora of Moscow" Information System on Moscow Digital Herbarium web-platform (research project #19-34-70018).
The MHA Herbarium holds vast collections from the Moscow metropolitan area (City of Moscow and Moscow Oblast) collected in the last 70 years, whereas the Moscow University Herbarium (MW) holdings are fairly evenly distributed in time over a period of 200 years. Altogether, MW and MHA have 130,000+ specimens from the Moscow Region, which make it the most densely-sampled territory across Russia. The idea of the research proposal was to digitise and precisely georeference this large dataset for proper understanding of changes in the flora around the City of Moscow through time and space. From March to October 2019, the MHA Herbarium team imaged 49.7K herbarium specimens of vascular plants at 600 dpi using Microtek 1600 Object Scan. In the next few months, 78.6% of them were georeferenced.
Further, the MHA Herbarium published online 15K images of its Eastern European collections (imaged earlier in 2017-2018), which are especially strong in the semi-arid flora of the Lower Volga Region. The MHA Herbarium collections are fully available in GBIF, Moscow Digital Herbarium and newly-established "Flora of Moscow" website (https://moscow.depo.msu.ru). At the moment, MHA Herbarium is the second largest imaged herbarium of Russia.
To schedule and perform the digitisation of the MHA Herbarium, we used five key stages by
1. Pre-digitisation curation and staging
The section curator reviews all incoming physical accessions for meeting the basic requirements of the herbarium specimen. A specimen should be a high-quality dried plant (or several individuals) with a label bearing identification, collection site, habitat, collection date and collector. After that, unmounted new material is frozen at a temperature of –30°C for 14 days as a quarantine procedure against specific herbarium pests and then mounted. New collections are counted (and listed in the collection journal) right after mounting. Sorting and incorporation of new material takes place once a year, usually in the autumn-winter period. Right before imaging, pre-ordered self-adhesive barcodes with an acronym and a seven-digit number (e.g. MHA 0 002 094) were attached to the herbarium sheet.
Eastern European section. In December 2017, with the purchase of a specialised scanner Microtek ObjectScan 1600, we began the imaging of vascular plants in the MHA Herbarium. Since the specimens from European Russia and adjacent states constitute the largest and most used section of the Herbarium, we decided to start imaging from this section. If there were two or more taxa on a single sheet, they were remounted on separate sheets.
Moscow section. From March to October 2019, the Moscow section of the Herbarium was imaged in line with the work under the RFBR grant "Information system Flora of Moscow on the platform of the Moscow Digital Herbarium" (under A.P. Seregin). The imaging of the Eastern European section was suspended for this time. Within the framework of the project, N.M. Reshetnikova (MHA Herbarium) and S.R. Mayorov (Moscow University) thoroughly revised the taxonomy of all Moscow specimens. After that, we checked the nomenclature on the folders and corrected it against the accepted backbone.
2. Specimen image capture
Specimens were imaged in accordance with international standards with a resolution of 600 dpi and a colour checker (24 colours). After scanning, each image was automatically renamed according to the barcode served as an unique identifier. In total, 14,274 specimens of the Eastern European section were digitised in 2017–2018. Imaged Eastern European collections at that time were stored on external discs without online access.
The Moscow section was scanned more intensively under the time limit from March to October 2019. Every day, two to three operators worked on the single scanner in shifts. For each shift lasting four to five hours, 140–160 specimens were digitised. Thus, 300–400 specimens were imaged per day per scanner. In total, the herbarium team imaged 49,621 specimens within eight months and completed the mission.
During the imaging, we encountered a number of minor issues:
3. Specimen image processing
While scanning, the operator started a new directory for every species and named it against a folder name. Before uploading the images into the Moscow Digital Herbarium, the structure of the directories was converted into a table of metadata. Thus, for each accession, the initial metadata included ID (barcode identifier), taxon name from folder without taxonomic authors and the geographic code of the area.
The taxon name, according to the protocols of the Moscow Digital Herbarium, was automatically matched with the latest version of the Catalogue of Life (CoL), from which the complete accepted name, synonymy and hierarchical list of supraspecific taxa were downloaded for every entry.
Publication of images with brief metadata is a powerful tool for rapid online access to the scanned herbarium collections. This approach was largely used in Paris where the largest herbarium of the world was imaged and published online (
After online publication of the Moscow Region specimens in the Moscow Digital Herbarium and GBIF, other sections of the MHA Herbarium will undergo the same procedure. Thus, to date, 64008 images of specimens of vascular plants from the MHA Herbarium are available online.
4. Electronic data capture
After online publication of the images and associated brief metadata, we link the records with existing full-label data capture of 7,087 specimens of the Moscow section (14.3%) made earlier by T.G. Nosova and I.A. Kravtsov in the form of a Microsoft Excel spreadsheet. For the remaining 42,534 specimens, the operators of the Moscow Digital Herbarium entered mandatory metadata—the collection date, the first collector, curatorial area and coordinates (if present on the label).
Similarly, a table with full-label data capture for 11,716 specimens from Eastern Europe (82% of the scanned ones) made by E.A. Karakina and B.L. Oshovskaya was uploaded as well. For the remaining 2,572 specimens, the operators of the Moscow Digital Herbarium and employees of the Garden entered additional mandatory metadata.
Thus, the minimum obligatory set of metadata available for all digitised specimens of the MHA Herbarium in this dataset include barcode ID, complete taxonomic information, collection date, the first collector, curatorial area and geographical coordinates (if available on the label). Additionally, 18,803 specimens had full-text inscriptions of labels (29.4%) due to earlier efforts.
Further full-text data capture was carried out by the operators of the Moscow Digital Herbarium for specimens collected within the City of Moscow (15,982 specimens). An operator entered the label data from the scanned image into an Microsoft Excel spreadsheet with 30 standard fields (including some pre-filled ones to avoid mistakes). Additionally, a commercial partner under the GBIF contract (2019) made full-text transcriptions of 4,617 specimens from the City of Moscow and Moscow Oblast.
After data entry, the scientific supervisor of the Moscow Digital Herbarium checked the spreadsheets for technical issues by a set of automatic, semi-automatic and manual operations. The IT-team, using the data migrator programme, then converted data from the Excel spreadsheet to the PostgreSQL database of the Moscow Digital Herbarium for further data storing and retrieving. This stage also includes some automatic checks of data consistency.
As of May 2020, the full text of labels has been entered for 39,448 specimens of the MHA Herbarium (61.6% of the imaged ones)—27,783 specimens of the Moscow section and 11,665 specimens of the Eastern European section. Full-text label transcriptions help to optimise the further georeferencing by combining labels with identical text into groups.
5. Georeferencing specimen data
The operators of the Moscow Digital Herbarium and the Garden employees carried out manual georeferencing with further implementation of the ISTRA system (Intellectual System of Toponymic Reading and Attribution), several lines of the code being written in JAVA. This code is integrated into the Moscow Digital Herbarium and unavailable as a stand-alone product.
The first algorithm of the ISTRA system combines the specimens into the groups according to the matching of the captured label text. In this case, there are two options for combining—complete matching mode and letters-only mode. The results do not differ in accuracy from the manual georeferencing. The second algorithm of the ISTRA system forms the specimen groups according to the matching of three fields—collection date, collector’s surname and curatorial area. Within the walking-day route, the standard georeferencing accuracy in most cases does not exceed 5 km. Further data refinement will help us to replace automatic georeferencing with the more accurate manual one.
In both cases, the operator inserts the coordinates manually and the system sets the coordinates automatically for all specimens of the group. The first algorithm takes precedence over the second one. In all cases, we save the log file and note the georeferencing method in the form of the standard disclaimers:
Manual georeferencing is carried out using standard e-cartographic libraries (Yandex.Maps, Google Maps, Wikimapia, SAS.Planet etc.) for modern specimens, whereas historic collections are georeferenced using the libraries of scanned maps (etomesto.ru, loadmap.net etc.) following the principle “collection date = map date”. Coordinate precision (rounded to 100 m) is set and stored for each manual georeferenced point.
Complete georeferencing of the specimens from the City of Moscow was a key task in 2020 for the Moscow University team (according to the Moscow project), whereas employees of the MHA Herbarium georeferenced specimens from Moscow Oblast and Eastern Europe (starting with the most prolific collectors). In total, 50,324 specimen have been georeferenced (74%), including 49,732 specimens from Russia.
For 7,414 specimens, the coordinates were taken from the label (14.7% of the number of georeferenced ones), for 10,849 specimens (21.6%), they were set manually and for 32,061 specimens (63.7%), they were calculated automatically using the ISTRA system.
The Eastern European section of the MHA Herbarium has its focus on European Russia (Table
Rank |
Country |
Estimated total number of specimens |
1 |
Russia |
131,420 |
2 |
Ukraine |
12,410 |
3 |
Lithuania |
1,640 |
4 |
Belarus |
1,610 |
5 |
Kazakhstan |
1,540 |
6 |
Estonia |
1,290 |
7 |
Moldova |
830 |
8 |
Latvia |
390 |
Collections of the MHA Herbarium from Eastern Europe by curatorial areas.
Rank |
Curatorial areas used in the Moscow Digital Herbarium |
Number of digitised specimens |
Estimated total number of specimens |
1 |
Moscow Region |
49,744 |
49,744 |
2 |
Lower Volga Region |
3,244 |
23,170 |
3 |
Central Region |
1,812 |
12,940 |
4 |
Central Forest-steppe Region |
1,459 |
10,420 |
5 |
Northern Region |
1,259 |
8,990 |
6 |
Eastern Region |
1,094 |
7,810 |
7 |
West-Ukrainian Region |
954 |
6,810 |
8 |
Western Region |
889 |
6,350 |
9 |
Northwest Region |
690 |
4,930 |
10 |
North-Ukrainian Region |
439 |
3,140 |
11 |
Middle Volga Region |
435 |
3,110 |
12 |
South-Ukrainian Region |
346 |
2,470 |
13 |
Rostov Oblast |
231 |
1,650 |
14 |
Lithuania |
229 |
1,640 |
15 |
Belarus |
228 |
1,630 |
16 |
Western Kazakhstan |
219 |
1,560 |
17 |
Estonia |
180 |
1,290 |
18 |
Western Siberia |
132 |
940 |
19 |
Moldova |
116 |
830 |
20 |
Volga-Kama Region |
87 |
620 |
21 |
Central forest Region |
84 |
600 |
22 |
Latvia |
54 |
390 |
Moscow Region forms its own section in the MHA Herbarium. This is due to the location of the Garden in the City of Moscow. One of the initial missions of the Herbarium was precise documentation of the local flora, including long-term observations of both native and alien plants. Based on these materials, standard flora and checklists were published by the Garden staff in collaboration with Moscow University (
The Lower Volga Region was one of the focus areas for A.K. Skvortsov, his graduate students and the Herbarium employees. This activity resulted in the published volumes of the “Flora of the Lower Volga” (
Geographical coordinates for the dataset frame are given below.
44.5 and 77 Latitude; 19.5 and 69.5 Longitude.
The dataset covers vascular plants of Eastern Europe, both native and alien species. There are also some specimens of cultivated plants, especially from the Moscow Region. The Moscow section is completely digitised and can provide figures on the taxonomic representation of the MHA Herbarium collections, whereas 14% of the the Eastern European section has been digitised and, therefore, information on its taxonomic composition only shows which families have been digitised so far.
Until 2017, the taxonomic backbone of the MHA Herbarium was the standard checklist by
Moscow section. It includes 2,261 species and hybrids from 773 genera and 138 families. The flora of the Moscow Region (the City of Moscow and Moscow Oblast) currently enumerates 2,363 taxa of vascular plants, including both wild and unintentionally-introduced plants (
Rank |
Family |
Number of specimens |
Rank |
Family |
Number of specimens |
1 |
Asteraceae |
5,410 |
11 |
Apiaceae |
1,334 |
2 |
Poaceae |
5,075 |
12 |
Polygonaceae |
1,279 |
3 |
Rosaceae |
3,733 |
13 |
Plantaginaceae |
1,109 |
4 |
Cyperaceae |
3,195 |
14 |
Violaceae |
1,064 |
5 |
Brassicaceae |
2,518 |
15 |
Amaranthaceae |
1,044 |
6 |
Fabaceae |
2,007 |
16 |
Boraginaceae |
1,023 |
7 |
Lamiaceae |
1,954 |
17 |
Onagraceae |
982 |
8 |
Ranunculaceae |
1,689 |
18 |
Ericaceae |
679 |
9 |
Caryophyllaceae |
1,515 |
19 |
Orchidaceae |
622 |
10 |
Salicaceae |
1,437 |
20 |
Orobanchaceae |
622 |
Rank |
Genus |
Number of specimens |
Rank |
Genus |
Number of specimens |
1 |
Carex |
2,561 |
11 |
Pilosella |
494 |
2 |
Salix |
1,108 |
12 |
Potentilla |
470 |
3 |
Viola |
1,064 |
13 |
Juncus |
453 |
4 |
Epilobium |
759 |
14 |
Bromus |
448 |
5 |
Ranunculus |
737 |
15 |
Rumex |
439 |
6 |
Veronica |
661 |
16 |
Vicia |
438 |
7 |
Alchemilla |
635 |
17 |
Myosotis |
399 |
8 |
Poa |
624 |
18 |
Prunus |
396 |
9 |
Galium |
589 |
19 |
Stellaria |
387 |
10 |
Campanula |
497 |
20 |
Mentha |
383 |
Rank |
Species |
Number of specimens |
1 |
Carex nigra (L.) Reichard |
270 |
2 |
Carex acuta L. |
224 |
3 |
Mentha arvensis L. |
194 |
4 |
Ranunculus cassubicus L. |
188 |
5 |
Viola canina L. |
188 |
6 |
Salix myrsinifolia Salisb. |
158 |
7 |
Symphyotrichum salignum (Willd.) G.L.Nesom |
151 |
8 |
Dryopteris carthusiana (Vill.) H.P. Fuchs |
147 |
9 |
Calamagrostis canescens (Weber) Roth |
144 |
10 |
Epilobium ciliatum Raf. |
144 |
11 |
Chenopodium album L. |
141 |
12 |
Valeriana officinalis L. |
133 |
13 |
Carex rostrata Stokes |
131 |
14 |
Epilobium roseum Schreb. |
131 |
15 |
Glechoma hederacea L. |
130 |
16 |
Persicaria lapathifolia (L.) Gray |
126 |
17 |
Epilobium pseudorubescens A.K. Skvortsov |
125 |
18 |
Polygonum aviculare L. |
125 |
19 |
Alchemilla micans Buser |
122 |
20 |
Rosa majalis Herrm. |
122 |
Eastern European section. In this section, 14% of the collections have been digitised so far, therefore Table
Top families of the Eastern European section, MHA Herbarium (digitised specimens only).
Rank |
Families |
Number of specimens |
Rank |
Families |
Number of specimens |
1 |
Poaceae |
8441 |
11 |
Cystopteridaceae |
241 |
2 |
Potamogetonaceae |
859 |
12 |
Hydrocharitaceae |
160 |
3 |
Cyperaceae |
761 |
13 |
Cupressaceae |
156 |
4 |
Equisetaceae |
460 |
14 |
Thelypteridaceae |
140 |
5 |
Lycopodiaceae |
443 |
15 |
Athyriaceae |
130 |
6 |
Dryopteridaceae |
428 |
16 |
Aspleniaceae |
104 |
7 |
Typhaceae |
339 |
17 |
Polypodiaceae |
96 |
8 |
Rosaceae |
313 |
18 |
Ephedraceae |
88 |
9 |
Pinaceae |
264 |
19 |
Juncaginaceae |
75 |
10 |
Alismataceae |
242 |
20 |
Ophioglossaceae |
67 |
Top genera of the Eastern European section, MHA Herbarium (digitised specimens only).
Rank |
Genera |
Number of specimens |
Rank |
Genera |
Number of specimens |
1 |
Poa |
835 |
11 |
Crataegus |
311 |
2 |
Festuca |
806 |
12 |
Elymus |
258 |
3 |
Potamogeton |
678 |
13 |
Puccinellia |
257 |
4 |
Stipa |
624 |
14 |
Glyceria |
236 |
5 |
Bromus |
613 |
15 |
Agropyron |
221 |
6 |
Equisetum |
460 |
16 |
Alopecurus |
215 |
7 |
Dryopteris |
367 |
17 |
Eriophorum |
208 |
8 |
Agrostis |
335 |
18 |
Lolium |
201 |
9 |
Koeleria |
334 |
19 |
Alisma |
187 |
10 |
Calamagrostis |
327 |
20 |
Anthoxanthum |
187 |
Top species of the Eastern European section, MHA Herbarium (digitised specimens only).
Rank |
Species |
Number of specimens |
1 |
Festuca valesiaca Schleich. ex Gaudin |
193 |
2 |
Festuca ovina L. |
157 |
3 |
Koeleria pyramidata (Lam.) P. Beauv. |
153 |
4 |
Stipa pennata L. |
145 |
5 |
Festuca rubra L. |
140 |
6 |
Dryopteris carthusiana (Vill.) H.P. Fuchs |
134 |
7 |
Elymus repens (L.) Gould |
128 |
8 |
Cystopteris fragilis (L.) Bernh. |
119 |
9 |
Poa bulbosa L. |
119 |
10 |
Bolboschoenus maritimus (L.) Palla |
116 |
11 |
Crataegus monogyna Jacq. |
115 |
12 |
Equisetum arvense L. |
111 |
13 |
Juniperus communis L. |
111 |
14 |
Spinulum annotinum (L.) A. Haines |
111 |
15 |
Stipa lessingiana Trin. et Rupr. |
110 |
16 |
Koeleria glauca (Spreng.) DC. |
106 |
17 |
Poa palustris L. |
105 |
18 |
Poa nemoralis L. |
100 |
19 |
Stuckenia pectinata (L.) Börner |
98 |
20 |
Bromus tectorum L. |
97 |
Rank | Scientific Name |
---|---|
phylum | Tracheophyta |
The Moscow and East European sections of the MHA Herbarium were launched in the second half of the 20th century and collections continue to grow in the 21st century. The mean year of collection for the digitised specimens of the entire MHA Herbarium is 1976. The mean collection date shows in which regions the Herbarium was currently active and from which areas, in particular, there is fresh material for DNA studies or adequate collections of recently-spreading alien species. From the majority of regions, new collections have come evenly since the foundation of the MHA Herbarium. They have an average collection date of 1975–1978 (Table
Mean collection date of the MHA Herbarium holdings across the regions.
Rank |
Curatorial areas used in the Moscow Digital Herbarium |
Mean collection year |
Number of digitised specimens with collection date |
1 |
Rostov Oblast |
2003 |
226 |
2 |
Lower Volga Region |
1990 |
3,145 |
3 |
Central Region |
1990 |
1,797 |
4 |
Central Forest-steppe Region |
1984 |
1,444 |
5 |
Volga-Kama Region |
1978 |
84 |
6 |
Western Region |
1977 |
883 |
7 |
Western Siberia |
1977 |
132 |
8 |
Moscow section |
1976 |
49,560 |
9 |
Lithuania |
1975 |
224 |
10 |
Western Kazakhstan |
1975 |
211 |
11 |
Central Forest Region |
1975 |
83 |
12 |
Northern Region |
1971 |
1,242 |
13 |
Moldova |
1971 |
116 |
14 |
Estonia |
1969 |
178 |
15 |
South-Ukrainian Region |
1968 |
334 |
16 |
Belarus |
1968 |
221 |
17 |
West-Ukrainian Region |
1967 |
923 |
18 |
North-Ukrainian Region |
1964 |
432 |
19 |
Eastern Region |
1959 |
1,073 |
20 |
Middle Volga Region |
1959 |
424 |
21 |
Northwest Region |
1953 |
678 |
22 |
Latvia |
1932 |
54 |
In recent decades, collections came mainly from four Regions—Rostov Oblast, Lower Volga Region, Central Region (mainly Kaluga Oblast) and Central Forest-Steppe Region (mainly Belgorod Oblast). These are the places of the fieldwork of the current Herbarium employees, as well as the above-mentioned expeditions across the Lower Volga Region of the 1990s. On the contrary, there have been no significant accessions from Ukraine, Belarus, Moldova, Estonia, Latvia, as well as some regions of European Russia in recent decades.
1. Moscow section. In this section, 49,550 specimens have collection date after 1890. Their temporal distribution over decades is given in Fig.
The peak of 1920s resulted from the transfer of earlier collections by D.P. Syreishchikov. The original collections of the Moscow section of the MHA Herbarium dated back to the period 1945–2018 with two peaks of major accessions—1960s and 1980s.
In the 1960s, the main collections came from V.A. Shtamm (1,709 specimens), A.K. Skvortsov (1,370), V.V. Makarov (1,314), G.P. Rysina (831), E.I. Kurchenko (549), A.P. Khokhryakov (445), A.A. Nekrasov (356), E.E. Gogina (181), V.S. Drozdova (153) and N.K. Shvedchikova (143). This was the time of active studies of the native flora and the publication of the standard guide by
In the 1980s, the most important Moscow collections were gathered by the MHA Herbarium employees M.S. Ignatov (2,716 specimens), V.D. Bochkin (2,585), V.V. Makarov (1,375), A.N. Shvetsov (577) and A.K. Skvortsov (512). Lesser contributions were made by V.B. Kuvaev (391), L.A. Deistfeldt (117), N.V. Kostyleva (108), A.E. Matsenko (91) and A.V. Shcherbakov (65). In this period, intensive studies of the alien flora of the Moscow Region resulted in the checklist by
2. Eastern European section
2.1. Lower Volga Region. At the moment, 3,244 specimens from this Region have been digitised so far. We assume that the total volume of collections from the Lower Volga is 23,170+ specimens. Figures given below are based on 3,145 digitised specimens (14% of the collection volume) having a collection date after 1890. Their temporal distribution over decades is given in Fig.
Notable collections from the Lower Volga began to arrive in the mid-1970s, but the peak of the major accessions stretched over the 1980s and 1990s. Especially large collections were made in 1982, 1986, 1989–1990 and 1993–1994.
In the 1980s, the major collections came from N.B. Belyanina (2500 estimated number of specimens/350 digitized), V.D. Bochkin (990/139), V.A. Sagalaev (670/94) and G.Yu. Klinkova (460/64). In the 1990s, the most important collections from the Lower Volga were accessed from V.A. Sagalaev (2,080/291), G.Yu. Klinkova (1,940/271), V.D. Bochkin (1,470/206), I.A. Shantser (830/116), A.K. Skvortsov (790/110) and S.R. Mayorov (230/41). These figures are based on the senior collectors mentioned in the labels, but in 1993, a top-record year, an expedition supported by the U.S. National Geographic Society collected at least 5,100 specimens (716 digitised) during a many-month trip across the Lower Volga Region and Western Kazakhstan performed by V.A. Sagalaev, G.Yu. Klinkova, I.A. Shantser, V.D. Bochkin, A.K. Skvortsov, M.Yu. Polonskaya, M.V. Kostina, V.V. Dzhanaeva and others.
2.2. Other Eastern European regions. Amongst other Eastern European collections, the most noticeable are those from the Central Region (especially Kaluga Oblast) (12,940 estimated number of specimens/1,812 digitised), the Central Forest-steppe Region (especially Belgorod Oblast) (10,420/1,459) and the Northern Region (8,990/1,259). Their temporal distribution over decades is given in Fig.
Accessions from the Central Region have two peaks—in the 1970s (especially 1971, 1974) and in 2000–2010s (especially 2003, 2007, 2014). In the 1970s, the main collections were received from V.V. Makarov (820 estimated number of specimens/115 digitised) and A.K. Skvortsov (290/41) and in the 2000–2010s from N.M. Reshetnikova (2,600/364), A.P. Seregin (940/132), A.V. Krylov (740/104) and A.A. Shmytov (320/45). The most sampled area is Kaluga Oblast which has been intensively studied by the Herbarium staff. This resulted in the publication of the standard regional flora (
The collections from the Central Forest-steppe Region have two peaks—in the 1960s (especially 1966, 1968) and in the 2000s (especially 2006-2008). In the 1960s, the main collections were acquired from V.V. Makarov (1,510 estimated number of specimens/211 digitised), A.P. Khokhryakov (330/46) and A.K. Skvortsov (230/32) and in the 2000s from N.M. Reshetnikova (1,410/197), A.K. Mamontov (790/110) and A.P. Seregin (340/47).
Accessions from the Northern Region are distributed more evenly across decades. Two peaks can be noted—in the 1950s—1960s (especially 1951, 1966) and in the 1980s (especially 1988). In the 1950–1960s, the main collections came from A.K. Skvortsov (850 estimated number of specimens/119 digitised), V.I. Sobolevsky (460/64), A.P. Khokhryakov (290/41) and in the 1980s from Konovalova (350/49), Smirnova (340/48) and Proskuryakova (340/47).
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) 4.0 Licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). The licence covers images of the herbarium specimens deposited in https://plant.depo.msu.ru/ and available in GBIF, as well as their metadata.
Column label | Column description |
---|---|
MHA Herbarium: Eastern European collections of vascular plants | In 2017–2019, the Herbarium staff imaged the Moscow section (100%) and the Eastern European section (14.1%) of the MHA Herbarium. In total, 64,008 specimens were digitised (600 dpi images and key metadata). These data were published in the Moscow Digital Herbarium in 2019–2020 and fully available in GBIF. Based on these data, a detailed overview of the physical collections of these two sections is given in this data paper, as well as spatial, temporal and taxonomic description of the dataset. As of May 2020, 50,324 specimens from the MHA Herbarium have been georeferenced (78.6%) and 39,448 specimens have fully captured label transcriptions (61.6%). |
Collectors
1. Moscow section. Full list of collectors consists of 823 surnames, including 127 people who collected more than 10 specimens. The list of top collectors of the Moscow section is given in Table
Rank |
Collector |
Number of specimens |
1 |
V.D. Bochkin (Fig. |
9,868 |
2 |
A.K. Skvortsov (Fig. |
4,170 |
3 |
V.V. Makarov (Fig. |
3,888 |
4 |
V.A. Shtamm (Fig. |
3,810 |
5 |
M.S. Ignatov (Fig. |
2,745 |
6 |
V.B. Kuvaev (Fig. |
2,659 |
7 |
D.P. Syreishchikov (Fig. |
2,013 |
8 |
A.P. Khokhryakov (Fig. |
1,674 |
9 |
Yu.A. Nasimovich (Fig. |
1,463 |
10 |
V.N. Voroshilov (Fig. |
1,368 |
11 |
K.Yu. Teplov (Fig. |
1,185 |
12 |
G.P. Rysina (Fig. |
949 |
13 |
E.E. Gogina |
876 |
14 |
A.I. Manin |
861 |
15 |
V.I. Sobolevsky |
852 |
16 |
P.A. Smirnov |
686 |
17 |
N.M. Reshetnikova |
655 |
18 |
A.N. Shvetsov |
579 |
19 |
A.A. Nekrasov |
559 |
20 |
E.I. Kurchenko |
554 |
21 |
T.N. Evtyukhova |
494 |
22 |
B.M. Kulkov |
468 |
23 |
L.A. Deistfeldt |
311 |
24 |
A.E. Matsenko |
291 |
25 |
N.K. Shvedchikova |
284 |
The basis of the Moscow section was formed by ca. 2,000 specimens from D.P. Syreyshchikov and ca. 700 specimens from P.A. Smirnov, collected in 1920s and received from the Timiryazev Institute of Plant Physiology (Moscow).
The staff collected later accessions directly from the Garden (Ostankino in Moscow) and various areas across the Moscow Oblast – V.N. Voroshilov (1940–1950s), T.N. Evtyukhova (1940s), V.A. Shtamm (1940–1960s), G.P. Rysina (1960s) and B.M. Kulkov (1940–1950s). The donations of V.I. Sobolevsky (1950s), A.A. Nekrasov (1950–1960s), A.I. Manin (1960–1970s), A.P. Khokhryakov (1950–1960s) and others from different areas of the Moscow Region enriched the section as well.
In 1970–1990s, V.V. Makarov, M.S. Ignatov, A.N. Shvetsov, V.D. Bochkin, E.E. Gogina, and A.E. Matsenko made the largest collections across the Moscow Region due to the research missions of the Garden employees devoted to rare and endangered plant species, audit and organisation of the protected areas with a focus on the districts west of Moscow.
The Garden staff also intensively studied the alien flora of the Moscow Region. This resulted in the special collections by A.K. Skvortsov, V.V. Makarov, M.S. Ignatov and A.N. Shvetsov, expanded later by V.D. Bochkin assisted by S.R. Mayorov, Yu.A. Nasimovich and Yu.K. Vinogradova. Their collections became the basis of monographic reviews on the alien flora of the Moscow Region (
E.I. Kurchenko (Serpukhov District), N.M. Reshetnikova (Ruza District), V.B. Kuvaev (Znamenskoye near Moscow), Yu.A. Nasimovich with L.A. Deystfeldt (several districts) donated their collections from the Moscow Region (Skvortsov and Belyanina 2005). In the last decade, K.Yu. Teplov transferred large collections of rare plants from the locations across the Region.
2. Eastern European section. The collection consists mainly of specimens which the Garden staff collected during field trips since the 1950s. Initially, herbarium vouchers accompanied living plants and seeds collected in the wild for the displays of the Garden. This documentation activity was later supplemented by extensive floristic and taxonomic studies, conservation research and monitoring of alien species.
2.1. Lower Volga Region. The flora of the southeast of European Russia is the most fully represented regional flora of the Eastern European section. The Region known as Lower Volga includes Volgograd, Astrakhan and Saratov Oblasts and the Republic of Kalmykia. This is a predominantly semi-arid steppe region. The list of collectors includes 136 surnames (see top-collectors in Table
Top collectors of the Eastern European section, MHA Herbarium: Lower Volga Region.
Rank |
Collector |
Number of digitised specimens (ca. 14%) |
Estimated total number of specimens |
1 |
N.B. Belyanina (Fig. |
542 |
3,870 |
2 |
V.A. Sagalaev (Fig. |
413 |
2,950 |
3 |
N.Yu. Stepanova (Fig. |
378 |
2,700 |
4 |
V.D. Bochkin (Fig. |
376 |
2,690 |
5 |
G.Yu. Klinkova (Fig. |
362 |
2,600 |
6 |
A.K. Skvortsov (Fig. |
141 |
1,010 |
7 |
I.A. Shantser (Fig. |
125 |
890 |
8 |
A.V. Kuvaev (Fig. |
81 |
580 |
9 |
A.E. Matsenko |
79 |
560 |
10 |
E.E. Gogina |
73 |
520 |
A.K. Skvortsov began his studies of the Lower Volga Region in the 1950s. In 1970–1990s, floristic expeditions were regular and the key collectors of that time were A.K. Skvortsov, A.E. Matsenko, V.V. Makarov, N.B. Belyanina, I.A. Shantser and V.D. Bochkin, as well as staff members of the Volgograd Pedagogical University (N.G. Volodina, V.A. Sagalaev and G.Yu. Klinkova). In 2010s, the collection activities were continued by N.Yu. Stepanova assisted by A.V. Kuvaev (Severtsov Institute) and I.N. Safronova (Komarov Institute) during their floristic studies of the Kuma-Manych depression and the Caspian Lowland.
A vast amount of material helped to critically assess the current state of the flora of the southeast of European Russia and with the publication of two volumes of the “Flora of the Lower Volga” (
2.2. Other areas. The MHA Herbarium covers all regions of Eastern Europe within the former USSR with varying degree of completion. Table
Top collectors of the Eastern European section, MHA Herbarium (excluding Lower Volga region).
Rank |
First collector |
Curatorial areas used in the Moscow Digital Herbarium |
Number of digitised specimens (ca. 14%) |
Estimated total number of specimens |
1 |
N.M. Reshetnikova (Fig. |
Central Forest-steppe Region |
407 |
2,910 |
2 |
V.V. Makarov (Fig. |
Western Region |
381 |
2,720 |
3 |
N.M. Reshetnikova |
Central Region |
368 |
2,630 |
4 |
V.I. Sobolevsky (Fig. |
West-Ukrainian Region |
250 |
1,790 |
5 |
V.V. Makarov |
Central Forest-steppe Region |
219 |
1,560 |
6 |
A.P. Khokhryakov (Fig. |
Eastern Region |
206 |
1,470 |
7 |
L.A. Utkin (Fig. |
Eastern Region |
202 |
1,440 |
8 |
V.V. Makarov |
Central Region |
187 |
1,340 |
9 |
A.K. Skvortsov (Fig. |
Northern Region |
178 |
1,270 |
10 |
N.Yu. Stepanova (Fig. |
Rostov Oblast |
176 |
1,260 |
11 |
N.B. Belyanina (Fig. |
Western Region |
139 |
990 |
12 |
A.P. Seregin (Fig. |
Central Region |
132 |
940 |
13 |
V.D. Bochkin (Fig. |
Central Region |
127 |
910 |
14 |
A.K. Skvortsov |
Western Siberia |
115 |
820 |
15 |
V.N. Voroshilov (Fig. |
Central Forest-steppe Region |
111 |
790 |
16 |
A.K. Mamontov (Fig. |
Central Forest-steppe Region |
111 |
790 |
17 |
A.P. Khokhryakov |
West-Ukrainian Region |
110 |
790 |
18 |
A.K. Skvortsov |
Eastern Region |
107 |
760 |
19 |
A.K. Skvortsov |
Western Region |
106 |
760 |
20 |
V.V. Makarov |
Lithuania |
106 |
760 |
21 |
A.V. Krylov (Fig. |
Central Region |
106 |
760 |
22 |
Yu.E. Alekseev |
Western Region |
99 |
710 |
23 |
V.V. Makarov |
North-Ukrainian Region |
97 |
690 |
24 |
A.K. Skvortsov |
West-Ukrainian Region |
93 |
660 |
25 |
A.P. Khokhryakov |
Central Forest-steppe Region |
84 |
600 |
26 |
V.I. Sobolevsky |
Central Region |
84 |
600 |
27 |
T.M. Smirnova |
Northern Region |
80 |
570 |
28 |
M.S. Ignatov |
Northern Region |
78 |
560 |
A large number of specimens from the Central Forest-steppe Region resulted from the recent floristic studies by staff member N.M. Reshetnikova (Belogorye Reserve, Belgorod Oblast) and graduate student A.K. Mamontov (Veidelevsky District, Belgorod Oblast). Collections by V.N. Voroshilov (Voronezh Oblast), V.V. Makarov (Tambov Oblast) and A.P. Khokhryakov (Penza Oblast) should also be acknowledged.
Collections from the Western Region (Smolensk and Bryansk Oblasts) were also made mainly by the herbarium staff (A.K. Skvortsov, V.V. Makarov and N.B. Belyanina). Yu.E. Alekseev from Moscow University donated his collections from Bryansk Oblast as a gift.
A large number of collections from the Central Region are associated with lengthy floristic studies by N.M. Reshetnikova in Kaluga Oblast expanded significantly by A.K. Krylov by the study of alien plants (
The West-Ukrainian Region is represented mainly by collections from the Carpathians, donated by V.I. Sobolevsky and A.P. Khokhryakov and minor gatherings by the expedition headed by A.K. Skvortsov.
Major collections from the Eastern Region were donated by L.A. Utkin (Southern Urals), A.P. Khokhryakov and M.T. Mazurenko (Bashkiria). A.K. Skvortsov also collected a lot in the 1950s in the Denezhkin Kamen Reserve (Sverdlovsk Oblast) and Zlatoust (Chelyabinsk Oblast).
Important collections from other areas include:
The reported project was funded by RFBR and Moscow City Government according to the research project #19-34-70018 (digitisation of the Moscow section) and MHA Institutional Research Project No 118021490111-5 (digitisation of the Eastern European section).
A.P. Seregin designed the project, managed georeferencing, checked and managed the data and prepared the manuscript.
N.Yu. Stepanova managed imaging, full label capturing and georeferncing, prepared plates and assisted in preparation of the manuscript.