Biodiversity Data Journal : Data Paper (Biosciences)
PDF
Data Paper (Biosciences)
Benthic Peracarids (Crustacea) from an unexplored area of Patagonian channels and Fjords
expand article infoPatricia Esquete‡, Cristian Aldea§
‡ CESAM & Departamento de Biologia. Universidade de Aveiro, Aveiro, Portugal
§ GAIA Antarctic Research Center (CIGA) and Department of Science and Natural Resources. Universidad de Magallanes, Punta Arenas, Chile
Corresponding author: Patricia Esquete (pesquete@ua.pt)
Academic editor: Luis Ernesto Bezerra
Received: 26 Aug 2020 | Accepted: 21 Sep 2020 | Published: 28 Sep 2020
© 2020 Patricia Esquete, Cristian Aldea
This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Citation: Esquete P, Aldea C (2020) Benthic Peracarids (Crustacea) from an unexplored area of Patagonian channels and Fjords. Biodiversity Data Journal 8: e58013. https://doi.org/10.3897/BDJ.8.e58013
 Open Access

Abstract

Background

The intricate geomorphology of the coastline in the Chilean Channels and Fjords region, together with the freshwater inputs from the ice fields provide the area with very unique ecological characteristics and a variety of habitats that favour great marine biodiversity. However, although Chilean Patagonia has been the focus of several expeditions and ecological surveys, the greatest emphasis has been either on the populated coasts of the Beagle Channel and the Straits of Magellan to the south or the area to the north of Golfo de Penas, leaving vast areas that remain largely unexplored. This leads to a latitudinal gap in the faunistic information and hinders zoogeographic studies to assess biogeographical connections along the eastern coasts of the Pacific. Peracarida is a taxonomic group that provides an excellent model for such studies because of their high abundance and biodiversity, benthic habits, small size and limited dispersal capacity.

New information

A dataset providing the first and only records of the benthic Peracarida between the latitudes 48–51.5°S of the Pacific coast of Chile is presented here, hence closing a geospatial gap for the study of the biogeographical connections of the Peracarida along the Eastern Pacific coast. The dataset comprises a total of 141 georeferenced records of 60 sublittoral species of Tanaidacea, Isopoda and Amphipoda. This and other studies reveal that the coastal fauna of the region follow a latitudinal distribution pattern at a larger scale and nested assemblages inside the channels and fjords that can be regarded as a consequence of the more restrictive conditions in the inner parts. In the present scenario of global warming that is expected to affect particularly polar and subpolar regions, the present dataset serves as a reference for the distribution patterns of benthic organisms with low dispersal capacity.

Keywords

estuary, fragmentation, nestedness, Magellan region, Pacific Ocean, Tanaidacea, Isopoda, Amphipoda

Introduction

The Patagonian Channels and Fjords constitute one of the largest estuarine systems of the world, extending along around 84,000 km of coastline (Silva and Palma 2008). They receive important freshwater inputs from glaciers and pluviosity, that, together with seasonal variations in temperature, cause hydrographic gradients in salinity and temperature from the inner parts to the open ocean (Chuecas and Ahumada 1980). It is an area of highly differentiated, fragmented ecosystems that offers a unique opportunity for studying the distribution patterns of the fauna in habitats with environmental gradients.

While the southern channels and fjords of the Magellan Region have been the focus of several expeditions and ecological surveys, the greatest emphasis has been on the populated coasts of the Beagle Channel and the Straits of Magellan (De Broyer et al. 2007): for example, the scientific expedition of the HMS Challenger in 1873-1876 and the Lund expedition (Brattström and Johanssen 2011), the more recent joint Chilean-German-Italian campaign Victor Hensen (Arntz and Gorny 1996) and periodic sampling efforts carried out by the Universidad de Magallanes (Ríos et al. 2007). By contrast, the coastal ecosystems of the less accessible area between the Golfo de Penas and the Smith Channel (48–52°S) remain largely unexplored. The sedimentary bottoms were surveyed by the scientific expedition CIIMAR Fiordo 2 (Silva and Palma 2008, Palma and Silva 2008) from which general results for the macrofauna were presented by Mutschke (2008), who stressed the scarcity of knowledge of the amphipod fauna in the region; species lists and biogeographic remarks have been carried out for the Polychaeta (Montiel et al. 2001) and Crustacea Decapoda (Retamal and Arias 2000). On the other hand, the hard substrates of this central zone had never been surveyed until the survey carried out in Bernardo O’Higgins National Park (henceforward BONP) on-board the R/V Nueva Galicia (Aldea et al. 2011, Aravena et al. 2018, Esquete and Aldea 2015, Esquete et al. 2012, Palacios 2018) and whose data pertaining to peracarid crustaceans are presented here.

The superorder Peracarida is one of the most abundant and diverse taxa in the marine benthos (Cartes et al. 2001, González et al. 2008, Spears et al. 2005). Perhaps the most significant synapomorphy that characterises the group is the presence of a marsupium where the larval stages develop, with the consequent absence of a dispersive phase (Johnson et al. 2001). The displacement capacity of the adults varies across orders, families and species, with proven consequences on species geographical distribution (e.g. Bober et al. 2018). This makes the Peracarida an excellent model taxon for hypothesis testing in biogeographical research; however, they are rarely the focus of such studies: biogeographic studies of the Peracarida of the coasts of Southeast Pacific do not generally include the Magellan Region. The distribution of algae-associated Peracarida along the Chilean coasts from the northern limit down to 42°S was studied by Thiel (2002). His work revealed a latitudinal pattern, with two well-differentiated main distribution areas separated by an extensive transitional zone. Later, Thiel et al. (2003) assessed the diversity and distribution of the peracarids of Chile including the Magellan Region and Antarctic territory, highlighting the contrast between the high species richness and scarcity of data for many taxa. More recently, González et al. (2008) compiled a list of the Chilean Peracarida and their latitudinal distribution, pointing out the scarcity of records in certain latitudes and a high level of endemism, with few species with broad latitudinal ranges. Every new survey comes with the discovery of undescribed species (see, for example, Esquete et al. 2012, Esquete and Aldea 2015) showing that, despite the efforts of classic expeditions and recent surveys,knowledge of the Peracarid fauna in the area is still in its infancy.

The present dataset includes records of Peracarida along four degrees of latitude where the underwater biodiversity remained unexplored. It provides data that allow us to link the biogeography of the southern Patagonian coast with the rest of the Eastern Pacific. Additionally, the present work contributes to the knowledge of the biodiversity of the Magellan Region. All in all, the relevance of the present dataset lies in three main factors:

  1. the importance of the Peracarida for biogeographic studies, due to their diversity and direct development;
  2. the geomorphologic and ecological particularities of the area covered; and
  3. the fact that it closes a latitudinal gap in the data available for this taxonomic group along the coasts of the eastern Pacific Ocean.

The potential of the usage of this dataset is exemplified here with nestedness analysis. It describes the species composition patterns within a continental biota and in isolated areas such as fragmented habitats and islands (Ulrich et al. 2009), which would represent a particular case of beta diversity (Ulrich and Almeida-Neto 2012). As such, nestedness constitutes an excellent means for assessing spatial patterns in terms of composition and distribution patterns in isolated ecosystems (Atmar and Patterson 1993, Escalante Espinosa and Morrone 2001).

Nestedness analysis was performed following Marin and Delgado (2001), based on the matrix of presence and absence of species by sampling site. Using the Nestcalc software (Atmar and Patterson 1993), the temperature of the observed matrix was calculated, which could vary in a range of 0-100°. A value T = 0° would correspond to a perfectly nested pattern, while T = 100° would correspond to a pattern where the set of species would be totally random (Atmar and Patterson 1993). In addition, the simulated temperature was calculated, under conditions of equal probability and Monte Carlo correction, applying 1000 iterations. The nesting graphic was obtained by the NeD software (Strona et al. 2014).

Project description

Title: 

Peracarida of Bernardo O’Higgins National Park (S Chile)

Personnel: 
Cristian Aldea, Aravena Juan Carlos
Study area description: 

The Bernardo O´Higgins National Park (BONP) is the largest protected area in the Southern Hemisphere with 3,525,901 hectares; its area includes the continental and archipelagic areas which extend from 47°55'S to 51°37'S.

Funding: 
Chilean Production Development Corporation (CORFO)

Sampling methods

Description: 

Sampling was performed as part of an exploratory study of the biodiversity of Bernardo O’Higgins National Park (henceforward BONP, Fig. 1). It is placed in the Chilean geopolitical regions of Aysén and Magallanes, extending along three degrees of latitude between 48.0–51.6°S and 73.3–75.8°W, in the central part of the Chilean Fjords and Channels Ecoregion (Spalding et al. 2007) and adjacent to the Southern Ice Fields. The intricate geomorphology of the coastline, together with the freshwater inputs from the ice fields provide the area with very unique ecological characteristics and a variety of habitats that favour great marine biodiversity (Aravena et al. 2018). The rocky bottoms inside the channels and fjords host abundant and diverse macroalgae, which, in turn, provide a variety of microhabitats for benthic fauna. Moreover, Palacios (2018) reported the presence of extensive kelp forests dominated by Macrocystis pyrifera and with the presence of Durvillaea antarctica, which are identified as keystone species, playing an important ecological role by providing structural support (Miller et al. 2018, Mills 2003) and enhancing dispersal (López et al. 2018) of benthic invertebrates.

Figure 1.  

Study area with the 23 sampling sites in the BONP, Chilean Fjords and Channels Ecoregion. Dark grey area corresponds to BONP.

Sampling description: 

The rocky sublittoral bottoms of the Channels and Fjords of the BONP were sampled between January and March 2010, during two cruises on board the vessel MV Nueva Galicia with the objective of characterising and mapping the benthic communities.

A total of 23 sites were sampled by SCUBA divers (Fig. 1). At each site, five replicate squares of 25 × 25 cm (0.063 m2) were scraped off all the organisms, including fauna and smaller algae. Kelps were excluded from the sample and left intact on the substrate. Two samples were taken at both 5 and 15 m depth at each site (totalling 10 squares per site). Samples were fixed in 5% buffered formalin and subsequently sorted, preserved in 70% alcohol and finally the organisms identified to the lowest possible taxonomic level.

Quality control: 

The records of species and their respective geographical positions of the sites were entered into a spreadsheet structured with the Darwin Core Standard (Wieczorek et al. 2012) adjusted taxonomically according to the World Register of Marine Species (WoRMS 2020). Data were submitted in the Integrated Publishing Toolkit, following standards of the Global Biodiversity Information Facility (GBIF).

Geographic coverage

Description: 

The coast of channels and fjords of the South East Pacific along three degrees of latitude.

Coordinates: 

-51.521 and -48.675 Latitude; -75.392 and -73.251 Longitude.

Taxonomic coverage

Description: 

The Peracarida identified to the lowest possible taxonomic level.

Taxa included:
Rank Scientific Name
phylum Arthropoda
subphylum Crustacea
class Malacostraca
order Amphipoda
family Amphilochidae
family Ampithoidae
family Aoridae
family Atylidae
family Calliopiidae
family Colomastigidae
family Corophiidae
family Dexaminidae
family Eusiridae
family Hyalidae
family Iphimediidae
family Ischyroceridae
family Leptocheliidae
family Leucothoidae
family Liljeborgiidae
family Lysianassidae
family Pardaliscidae
family Photidae
family Phoxocephalidae
family Pontogeneiidae
family Stegocephalidae
family Stenothoidae
family Synopiidae
family Talitridae
family Tryphosidae
family Uristidae
order Isopoda
family Chaetiliidae
family Janiridae
family Spaheromatidae
family Stenetriidae
order Tanaidacea
family Nototaidae
family Tanaididae

Temporal coverage

Notes: 

2010-01-26 through 2010-03-24

Usage rights

Use license: 
Creative Commons Public Domain Waiver (CC-Zero)
IP rights notes: 

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC-BY-NC) 4.0 Licence

Data resources

Data package title: 
Peracarida of Bernardo O’Higgins National Park (S Chile)
Resource link: 
https://www.gbif.org/dataset/2401cd5e-26a8-4a0c-9007-e5e6137a1364
Alternative identifiers: 
http://gbif-chile.mma.gob.cl/ipt/resource?r=peracarida-pnbo
Number of data sets: 
1
Data set name: 
Peracarida of Bernardo O’Higgins National Park (S Chile)
Download URL: 
https://www.gbif.org/dataset/2401cd5e-26a8-4a0c-9007-e5e6137a1364#dataDescription
Data format: 
Darwin Core
Description: 

A total of 60 peracarid species were identified in the area, making up a total of 141 georeferenced records (Aldea and Esquete 2020). Amphipoda were the most diverse, representing 85% (52 species), followed by the Isopoda (10%, 6 species) and the Tanaidacea (8%, 5 species).

Column label Column description
id stable identifier assigned by GBIF
institutionCode code for the institution the record belongs to
collectionCode code of the physical collection within the institution
basisOfRecord observation type
occurrenceID unique identifier of the occurrence
recordedBy name of the person responsible for the record
individualCount number of specimens
preparations preservation/storage method
eventDate date of the event
catalogNumber identifier within the physical collection
scientificNameAuthorship authorship information for the scientific name formatted according to the conventions of the applicable nomenclaturalCode
geodeticDatum the ellipsoid, geodetic datum or spatial reference system (SRS) upon which the geographic coordinates given are based
habitat habitat of the occurrence
samplingProtocol collection methods
countryCode code of the country of the occurrence location
stateProvince province and region of the occurrence location
county county or commune of the occurrence location
locality locality of the occurrence location
decimalLatitude latitude in decimal degrees for the occurrence location
decimalLongitude longitude in decimal degrees for the occurrence location
verbatimCoordinateSystem coordinate system as originally indicated
verbatimSRS spatial reference system as originally indicated
identificationQualifier identification qualifier for the taxon
identifiedBy name of the person/s who identified the occurrence
dateIdentified date when the occurrence was identified
scientificName scientific name of the lowest taxonomic level attained for the occurrence. If species level, full scientific name, with authorship and date information
kingdom kingdom of the occurrence
phylum phylum of the occurrence
class class of the occurrence
order order of the occurrence
family family of the occurrence
genus genus of the occurrence
specificEpithet species name of the occurrence
taxonRank lowest taxon rank of identification of the occurrence
verbatimLatitude verbatim original latitude of the Location
verbatimLongitude verbatim original longitude of the Location
country country of the occurrence
coordinateUncertaintyInMetres horizontal distance (in metres) from the given decimalLatitude and decimalLongitude describing the smallest circle containing the whole of the Location

Additional information

The results showed that the Peracarida of the BONP presented a nested pattern, with a larger number of species in the outermost part of the channels and subsets of those in the innermost. The temperature of the matrix was 20.762°C; p < 0.01 (Fig. 2).

Figure 2.  

Analysis of nestedness of peracarids of the BONP. Species presence is marked with a grey square, absence with white. The lines of perfect order (minimum temperature) are indicated in the matrix. Vertical axis: sampling sites (St), number of species in brackets. Horizontal axis: Species found, with the number of sites where the species was found in brackets.

This study widens the known distribution limit of several species previously recorded in Patagonia and the Southern Ocean (compiled in De Broyer et al. 2007, Horton et al. 2020): for instance, the amphipod Aora maculata (Thomson, 1879) has been recorded in several locations throughout the Southern Ocean and this is the first record in the American continent. Likewise, the amphipods Jassa ingens (Pfeffer, 1888), Jassa thurstoni Conlan, 1990 and Heterophoxus trichosus K.H. Barnard, 1932 and the isopod Ischyromene eatoni (Miers, 1875), whose distributions were previously confined to the Scotia Arch Islands and the Southern Ocean, are registered for the first time on this latitude. Colomastix castellata K.H. Barnard, 1932 was described from Islas Malvinas (Falkland Islands) and is found for the first time since the original description. Uristes subchelatus (Schellenberg, 1931) is found for the first time out of the Magellan Strait. A total of 50% of the species occurred in one site only, which can be interpreted as a consequence of the heterogeneity and habitat fragmentation of the area and the niche specificity of Peracarid species.

Generally, species distribution patterns observed at the present time are the result of several ecological, evolutionary and biological processes. Given that nested patterns can be the result of extinction and/or colonisation processes (González and Poulin 2005), the results presented here have three possible interpretations:

  1. as a colonisation process from the open ocean towards the inner parts of the channel;
  2. as a consequence of an increased heterogeneity and hence the higher number of available niches towards the outer part of the channels; or
  3. as a consequence of a gradient of environmental conditions along the channels being less favourable to the development of the Peracarids towards the inner part.

Nested patterns have been found previously in the marine fauna of the region, generally consistent with the latitudinal gradient: fish parasite species (González and Poulin 2005) and polychaete assemblages (Moreno et al. 2006) adjust to this pattern, in both cases revealing that the majority of the species find their optimum at a certain range of latitude. Perhaps more interestingly, a biogeographical study of the calanoid copepods of the southern Chilean channels showed a nested pattern characterising various subsets of a larger assemblage corresponding to inner “microbasins” within the channels (Marin and Delgado 2001).

Conclusions

The combination of the results presented here and those of the mentioned previous studies seems to indicate that, whereas at a larger scale, there are clear latitudinal patterns in the distribution of the marine species along the southeast Pacific coasts, the distribution on a finer scale responds to more specific ecological preferences of the species and the more extreme environmental conditions in the inner part of channels and fjords.

This dataset compiles the first and only records of the benthic Peracarida in the channels and fjords of the Pacific coast of Chile between the 48–51.5°S, hence closing a latitudinal gap for the study of the biogeographical connections of the group along the Eastern Pacific coast. In the present scenario of global warming that is expected to affect particularly polar and subpolar regions, the present dataset serves as a reference for the distribution patterns of benthic organisms with low dispersal capacity.

Acknowledgements

P. Esquete is funded by national funds (OE), through FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia, I.P., in the scope of the framework contract foreseen in the numbers 4, 5 and 6 of the article 23, of the Decree-Law 57/2016, of 29 August 2016, changed by Law 57/2017, of 19 July 2017. Thanks are due to FCT/MCTES for the financial support to CESAM (UIDP/50017/2020+UIDB/50017/2020) through national funds. C. Aldea acknowledges the contribution of the project INNOVA 08CTU01-20 (developed by CEQUA Foundation and Chilean National Forest Corporation – CONAF) and supported by the Chilean Production Development Corporation (CORFO) and the programme VRIP-UMAG PR-06-CRN -18 (Diversity of molluscs and benthic crustaceans in the Straits of Magellan: biogeography, ordering and comparative endemism), supported by Direction of Research UMAG.

Author contributions

C.A. contributed to sampling planning, design and execution. P.E. performed the taxonomic identification of the specimens. Both authors collaborated on data analysis and manuscript preparation.

References

login to comment