Biodiversity Data Journal :
Data Paper (Biosciences)
|
Corresponding author: Beatriz E Lujan-Toro (bibilujan@gmail.com)
Academic editor: Gianniantonio Domina
Received: 17 Sep 2020 | Accepted: 13 Jan 2021 | Published: 04 Mar 2021
This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the CC0 Public Domain Dedication.
Citation:
Francis A, Lujan-Toro BE, Warwick SI, Macklin JA, Martin SL (2021) Update on the Brassicaceae species checklist. Biodiversity Data Journal 9: e58773. https://doi.org/10.3897/BDJ.9.e58773
|
Here we present a revised species checklist for the Brassicaceae, updated from Warwick SI, Francis, A, Al-Shehbaz IA (2006), Brassicaceae: Species checklist and database on CD-ROM, Plant Systematics and Evolution 259: 249─25. This update of the checklist was initiated, based on recent taxonomic and molecular studies on the Brassicaceae that have resulted in new species names, combinations and associated synonyms.
New data have been added indicating tribal affiliations within the family and where type specimens have been designated. In addition, information from many early publications has been checked and added to the database. The database now includes information on 14983 taxa, 4636 of which are currently accepted and divided into 340 genera and 52 tribes. A selected bibliography of recent publications on the Brassicaceae is included.
checklist, Brassicaceae, mustard family, crucifer, global checklist
The taxonomic organisation of the Brassicaceae has continued to undergo revision and refinement. Extensive taxonomic and molecular studies from many parts of the world have led to several additional taxa, nomenclatural changes in existing taxa and changes in tribal affiliations within the family. Verification of many previously unavailable references has been made possible due to recently digitised archival material dating from the 18th to the early 20th centuries. Additionally, the publication of the results of extensive surveys of the Linnaean and other herbaria has led to the typification of specimens in cases where an author’s holotype was not clear. This information has been incorporated into the species checklist.
The current checklist links all listed taxa to 52 tribes, including several that have been recently described or re-established: Alyssopsideae (
The tribal placement of several unassigned genera listed in
Significant generic changes have occurred since the previous version of the checklist. The following 17 genera have been re-instated: Abdra (
Recently, there has been a growing emphasis by botanists on the re-examination of herbarium specimens to establish which specimens clearly represent the holotype of an author’s species and which ones require a new designation. Occasional designations of a type by botanists go back over a century, but papers have been appearing in recent decades dedicated in part or even entirely to typification of species. Amongst such papers are
Following the extensive taxonomic changes in the Brassicaceae, we provide an updated checklist that follows biodiversity data standards for publication, making this new version easily accessible and interoperable. Taxon names and authorities in the checklist were compared to the International Plant Names Index (IPNI) and BrassiBase, a Brassicaceae knowledge system maintained by experts in the plant family (
Update on the Brassicaceae Species Checklist
The checklist covers species, subspecies and varieties from the Brassicaceae family at a global scale.
-90 and 90 Latitude; -180 and 180 Longitude.
The database includes information on 14983 taxa, 4636 of which are currently accepted and divided into 340 genera and 52 tribes.
Rank | Scientific Name | Common Name |
---|---|---|
kingdom | Plantae | plants |
class | Equisetopsida | vascular plants |
family | Brassicaceae | mustard or crucifer family |
The database includes taxa published from 1970 through to 2019.
Column label | Column description |
---|---|
id | Row number. |
taxonID | A unique identifier for the set of nomenclatural and taxonomic information (data associated with the Taxon class). |
acceptedNameUsageID | The taxonID of the taxon considered to be the accepted name for this nameUsage. |
scientificName | The taxon name with authorship information, if applicable. |
acceptedNameUsage | The scientificName of the taxon considered to be the accepted name for this nameUsage. |
originalNameUsage | The equivalent of the scientificName as it originally appeared when the name was first established under the rules of the associated nomenclaturalCode (i.e. within the namePublishedIn reference). The basionym of the scientificName or the senior/earlier homonym for replaced names. |
namePublishedIn | Reference to a publication representing the original publication of the name. |
genus | The full scientific name of the genus in which the taxon is classified. |
specificEpithet | The name of the species epithet of the scientificName. |
infraspecificEpithet | The name of the lowest or terminal infraspecific epithet of the scientificName, excluding any rank marker. |
taxonRank | The taxonomic rank of the most specific name in the scientificName. |
taxonomicStatus | The status of the use of the scientificName as a label for a taxon. |
taxonRemarks | Comments or notes about the taxon or name. Includes the tribe designation of the taxon. |
The checklist presented here (
In total, 1212 new taxa were included, 131 taxa moved to a different genus, 1970 taxa changed status, the authority of 3672 taxa was changed to meet the well-established abbreviation guidelines (
The fields in this new version of the checklist were mapped to the appropriate Darwin Core (DwC) terms to meet biodiversity data standards. This checklist was then published in the Pensoft Integrated Publishing Toolkit (IPT, http://ipt.pensoft.net/rss.do) and published in GBIF (https://doi.org/10.15468/rb7kky).
To validate the checklist, taxon names and their authority, including the basionym authority, were matched to IPNI using the Global Names Resolver (gnr_resolve) from the R package taxize (0.9.99). To compare with other available Brassicaceae resources, BrassiBase (v1.3) taxon names and their authority were also matched to IPNI, as described above. At the time of the analysis, gnr_resolve had last updated their IPNI database on 28-05-2020. The data and accompanying code were version-tracked using Git and are available in the public repository (https://bitbucket.org/bibilujan/global_brassicaceae_checklist/src/master/).
Comparison to IPNI and BrassiBase showed a large overlap amongst the three resources. Forty-three percent of the names were consistent in all three resources and 18% were uniquely represented in the checklist presented here, with no exact match to IPNI or BrassiBase (Fig.
Authority abbreviation format in the checklist presented here was more consistent with IPNI than BrassiBase; when whitespace is ignored, more of the BrassiBase names are consistent with IPNI and Francis et al. (Table
Proportion and total number of taxon names and their authority from the Brassicaceae checklist (Francis et al.) that were shared with IPNI and BrassiBase, after performing an exact match and a match that ignores spaces.
Match Type |
Exact match |
Ignore spaces |
||
Count |
Percentage (%) |
Count |
Percentage (%) |
|
All |
6485 |
43 |
9076 |
60 |
Francis et al. & IPNI |
3083 |
21 |
532 |
4 |
Francis et al. & BrassiBase |
2762 |
18 |
3984 |
27 |
Francis et al. |
2653 |
18 |
1391 |
9 |
From the total 14,983 names and their authority in the Brassicaceae Checklist, 64% were found to match IPNI (Table
Proportion and total number of taxon names and their authority from the Brassicaceae checklist after matching to IPNI using Global Names Resolver from the R package taxize.
Match to IPNI | Count | Percentage (%) |
Exact | 9568 | 64 |
No match to IPNI | 2225 | 15 |
Author no match | 1690 | 11 |
Basionym author no match | 1165 | 8 |
Name spelling no match | 335 | 2 |
The checklist, presented here, provides a significant update to the first version (
Efforts have been made in this release of the Brassicaceae Checklist to meet current standards of data publishing: columns in the database have been converted to DwC terms, version control has been used and the checklist has been published through an IPT and GBIF. The names in the checklist were matched to IPNI and BrassiBase for comparison and a large overlap was found amongst the three resources (Fig.
We would like to thank Pensoft for hosting the DarwinCore Archive file associated with this manuscript.
SW and AF constructed the initial database, AF and SM evaluated the recent literature, maintained the database and wrote the manuscript. BL reviewed and curated the data. All authors contributed to the editing of the paper.
Additional recent and relevant publications used to build the checklist.
Taxon names and their taxonID from the Brassicaceae checklist that had a different authority when compared to the International Plant Names Index (IPNI) using the Global Names Resolver (gnr_resolve) from the R package taxize.
Scientific names of taxa in the Brassicaceae checklist that had a different spelling than their match in the International Plant Names Index (IPNI) when compared using the Global Names Resolver (gnr_resolve) from the R package taxize.