Biodiversity Data Journal :
Data Paper (Biosciences)
|
Corresponding author: Rui Carvalho (rui.m.carvalho@gmail.com), Paulo A. V. Borges (paulo.av.borges@uac.pt)
Academic editor: Jeremy Miller
Received: 07 Jan 2021 | Accepted: 22 Mar 2021 | Published: 16 Apr 2021
© 2021 Rui Carvalho, Pedro Cardoso, Artur Gil, Maria Teresa Ferreira, Cândida Ramos, Lucas Lamelas-Lopez, Fernando Pereira, Jagoba Malumbres-Olarte, Alejandra Ros-Prieto, Mário Boieiro, Paulo Borges
This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Citation:
Carvalho R, Cardoso P, Gil A, Ferreira MT, Ramos C, Lamelas-Lopez L, Pereira F, Malumbres-Olarte J, Ros-Prieto A, Boieiro M, Borges PAV (2021) Standardised inventories of spiders (Arachnida, Araneae) on touristic trails of the native forests of the Azores (Portugal). Biodiversity Data Journal 9: e62886. https://doi.org/10.3897/BDJ.9.e62886
|
The sharp increase in tourist visitation of the Azores Archipelago from 2015 onwards raised concerns about the impacts of recreational tourism on native habitats. In response, a project was financed by the Azorean Government to investigate the drivers of biodiversity erosion associated with recreational tourism. Here, we present the data on spider biodiversity found on trails located within the native Azorean forests as they are home to several endemic species of great conservation value. We applied an optimised and standardised sampling protocol (COBRA) in twenty-three plots located in five trails on Terceira and São Miguel Islands and assessed diversity and abundance of spider species at different distances from the trail head and the trail itself.
Of the 45 species (12435 specimens) collected, 13 were endemic to the Azores (9690 specimens), 10 native non-endemic (2047 specimens) and 22 introduced (698 specimens). This database will be the baseline of a long-term monitoring project for the assessment of touristic impacts on native forest trails. This methodology can also be used on other habitats and biogeograhical regions.
Arthropoda, hiking, recreation ecology, Macaronesia, endemic species, checklist
In the Azores, as in many other temperate, semi-tropical and tropical islands, historical patterns of habitat loss have typically resulted in lowland clearance, meaning that the last remnants of the pre-human pristine forest that covered the major parts of oceanic islands are in the mountain areas (
The recent increase in recreational tourist activities in native habitats of the Azores (
The spider communities of the Azores are exceptionally well known due to ongoing inventorying and monitoring projects carried out since 1999 (
We aimed to characterise the richness and abundance of spiders in areas surrounding trails in native Azorean forest and to assess if the distance to the head of hiking trails or to the trail itself explains shifts in spider community composition, compared with areas undisturbed by tourists.
Spiders (Arachnida, Araneae) from Azorean native forest trails
Rui Carvalho led the sampling in the field with the participation of Alejandra Ros-Prieto, Cândida Ramos, Fernando Pereira, Jagoba Malumbres-Olarte, Maria T. Ferreira, Mário Boieiro, Lucas Lamelas-López and Paulo A. V. Borges.
We focused on the Azorean forests of Terceira and São Miguel Islands, as they have pedestrian trails going through native forests with a relevant level of visitation (Fig.
This research was supported by the Rui Carvalho Ph.D. DRCT scholarship from the Azores Government (M3.1.a/F/135/2015). Data was obtained mostly during the Ph.D. DRCT scholarship, but some samples ("Control 250", see below) are from a previous project (ERA-Net NetBiome research framework, financed through Portuguese FCT-NETBIOME ISLANDBIODIV grant 0003/2011).
We selected six 50 x 50 m sampling sites in native forest patches along the studied trails, at increasing distances from the trail head: 0 m, 50 m and 250 m. Another sampling site, termed Max, was set independently from distance - it was located where the forest adjacent to the trail was most pristine. Finally, two control sites were selected at 50 m and 250 m from the closest trail point (Table
Island | Fragment | Trail | Sampling sites | Latitude | Longitude |
Terceira | Santa Bárbara | Lagoinha | 0 |
|
|
Terceira | Santa Bárbara | Lagoinha | 50 |
|
|
Terceira | Santa Bárbara | Lagoinha | 250 |
|
|
Terceira | Santa Bárbara | Lagoinha | Control 50 |
|
|
Terceira | Santa Bárbara | Lagoinha | Control 250 |
|
|
Terceira | Santa Bárbara | Mistérios Negros | 0 |
|
|
Terceira | Santa Bárbara | Mistérios Negros | 50 |
|
|
Terceira | Santa Bárbara | Mistérios Negros | 250 |
|
|
Terceira | Santa Bárbara | Mistérios Negros | Max |
|
|
Terceira | Santa Bárbara | Mistérios Negros | Control 50 |
|
|
Terceira | Santa Bárbara | Mistérios Negros | Control 250 |
|
|
Terceira | Santa Bárbara | Santa Bárbara | 0 |
|
|
Terceira | Santa Bárbara | Santa Bárbara | 50 |
|
|
Terceira | Santa Bárbara | Santa Bárbara | 250 | 38.7336 |
-27.3088 |
Terceira | Santa Bárbara | Santa Bárbara | Max |
|
|
Terceira | Santa Bárbara | Santa Bárbara | Control 50 |
|
|
Terceira | Santa Bárbara | Santa Bárbara | Control 250 |
|
|
Terceira | Guilherme Moniz | Guilherme Moniz | 0 |
|
|
São Miguel | Pico da Vara | Malhadas | 0 |
|
|
São Miguel | Pico da Vara | Malhadas | 50 |
|
|
São Miguel | Pico da Vara | Malhadas | 250 |
|
|
São Miguel | Pico da Vara | Malhadas | Max |
|
|
The inventory COBRA (Conservation Oriented Biodiversity Rapid Assessment) protocol (
All the spider specimens were first sorted into morphospecies by R Carvalho and later identified by a trained taxonomist (one of the authors: PAV Borges).
Terceira and São Miguel Islands, Azores, Portugal
Bounding Coordinates: South West [37.579, -27.466], North East [39.045, -25.049]
Rank | Scientific Name | Common Name |
---|---|---|
order | Araneae | Spiders |
July to August 2012 for the Control 250 samples; July to October 2017 for all other samples.
CC-BY 4.0
The following data table includes all the records for which a taxonomic identification of the species was possible. The dataset submitted to GBIF (Global Biodiversity Information Facility) is structured as a sample event dataset, with two tables: event (as core) and occurrences. The data in this sampling event resource have been published as a Darwin Core Archive (DwCA), which is a standardised format for sharing biodiversity data as a set of one or more data tables. The core data file contains 194 records (eventID) and the occurrences file 1290 records (occurrenceID). This IPT (integrated publishing toolkit) archives the data and thus serves as the data repository. The data and resource metadata are available for download from
Column label | Column description |
---|---|
Table of Sampling Events | Table with sampling events data (beginning of table) |
id | Unique identification code for sampling event data |
eventID | Identifier of the events, unique for the dataset |
stateProvince | Name of the region of the sampling site |
islandGroup | Name of archipelago |
island | Name of the island |
country | Country of the sampling site |
countryCode | ISO code of the country of the sampling site |
municipality | Municipality of the sampling site |
decimalLongitude | Approximate centre point decimal longitude of the field site in GPS coordinates |
decimalLatitude | Approximate centre point decimal latitude of the field site in GPS coordinates |
geodeticDatum | The ellipsoid, geodetic datum or spatial reference system (SRS) upon which the geographic coordinates given in decimalLatitude and decimalLongitude are based |
coordinateUncertaintyInMetres | Uncertainty of the coordinates of the centre of the sampling plot |
coordinatePrecision | Precision of the coordinates |
georeferenceSources | A list (concatenated and separated) of maps, gazetteers or other resources used to georeference the Location, described specifically enough to allow anyone in the future to use the same resources. |
locationID | Identifier of the location |
locationRemarks | Details on the locality site |
locality | Name of the locality |
minimumElevationInMetres | The lower limit of the range of elevation (altitude, usually above sea level), in metres. |
maximumElevationInMetres | The upper limit of the range of elevation (altitude, usually above sea level), in metres. |
habitat | The surveyed habitat |
year | Year of the event |
month | Month of the event |
day | Day of the event |
eventRemarks | Comments or notes about the Event |
samplingProtocol | The sampling protocol used to capture the species |
sampleSizeValue | The numeric amount of time spent in each sampling |
sampleSizeUnit | The unit of the sample size value |
samplingEffort | The amount of time of each sampling |
fieldNumber | An identifier given to the event in the field. Often serves as a link between field notes and the Event. |
eventDate | Date or date range the record was collected |
Table of Species Occurrence | Table with species abundance data (beginning of new table) |
id | Unique identification code for species abundance data |
type | Type of the record, as defined by the Public Core standard |
licence | Reference to the licence under which the record is published |
institutionID | The identity of the institution publishing the data |
collectionID | The identity of the collection publishing the data |
institutionCode | The code of the institution publishing the data |
collectionCode | The code of the collection where the specimens are conserved |
datasetName | Name of the dataset |
basisOfRecord | The nature of the data record |
dynamicProperties | The name of the scientific project funding the sampling |
occurrenceID | Identifier of the record, coded as a global unique identifier |
recordedBy | Name of the person who performed the sampling of the specimens |
individualCount | Total number of individuals captured |
sex | The sex and quantity of the individuals captured |
lifeStage | The life stage of the organisms captured |
establishmentMeans | The process of establishment of the species in the location, using a controlled vocabulary: 'naturalised', 'introduced', 'endemic', "unknown" |
eventID | Identifier of the events, unique for the dataset |
scientificName | Complete scientific name including author and year |
kingdom | Kingdom name |
phylum | Phylum name |
class | Class name |
order | Order name |
family | Family name |
genus | Genus name |
specificEpithet | Specific epithet |
taxonRank | Lowest taxonomic rank of the record |
scientificNameAuthorship | Name of the author of the lowest taxon rank included in the record |
We collected a total of 12435 specimens belonging to 45 species of spiders. A total of 13 species are endemic to the Azores Archipelago (9690 specimens), 10 are native non-endemic (2047 specimens) and 22 are introduced (698 specimens) (Table
Diversity and abundance for the collected species, according to biogeographic origin and sampling area.
Endemic | Native | Introduced | ||||
Trail / Sampling Area | Species richness | Abundance | Species richness | Abundance | Species richness | Abundance |
Lagoinha 0 | 5 | 479 | 10 | 62 | 5 | 7 |
Lagoinha 50 | 7 | 364 | 14 | 91 | 7 | 15 |
Lagoinha 250 | 5 | 534 | 12 | 64 | 7 | 11 |
Lagoinha Control 50 | 9 | 419 | 15 | 174 | 3 | 5 |
Lagoinha Control 250 | 5 | 417 | 14 | 187 | 10 | 27 |
Mistérios Negros 0 | 6 | 466 | 17 | 94 | 14 | 33 |
Mistérios Negros 50 | 8 | 421 | 15 | 55 | 7 | 14 |
Mistérios Negros 250 | 8 | 418 | 18 | 119 | 18 | 184 |
Mistérios Negros Max | 9 | 628 | 20 | 64 | 15 | 57 |
Mistérios Negros Control 50 | 6 | 993 | 13 | 187 | 10 | 27 |
Mistérios Negros Control 250 | 9 | 394 | 17 | 128 | 7 | 12 |
Santa Bárbara 0 | 8 | 325 | 13 | 17 | 2 | 12 |
Santa Bárbara 50 | 7 | 230 | 13 | 38 | 5 | 22 |
Santa Bárbara 250 | 6 | 417 | 11 | 43 | 3 | 7 |
Santa Bárbara Max | 8 | 410 | 15 | 40 | 4 | 6 |
Santa Bárbara Control 50 | 7 | 463 | 16 | 26 | 6 | 10 |
Santa Bárbara Control 250 | 10 | 405 | 17 | 75 | 8 | 17 |
Guilherme Moniz 0 | 8 | 903 | 26 | 220 | 20 | 57 |
Malhadas 0 | 6 | 148 | 18 | 41 | 13 | 20 |
Malhadas 50 | 7 | 245 | 22 | 63 | 19 | 79 |
Malhadas 250 | 5 | 232 | 14 | 43 | 10 | 30 |
Malhadas Max | 7 | 378 | 22 | 217 | 35 |
46 |
Spider species abundance in each study area and their biogeographic origin. Abbreviations: Biogeographic origin (Biog. origin); Endemic (END); Introduced (INT); Native (NAT).
Family | Scientific name | Biog. origin | Lagoinha | Mistérios Negros | Santa Bárbara | Guilherme Moniz | Malhadas |
Araneidae | Gibbaranea occidentalis Wunderlich, 1989 | END | 813 | 1754 | 365 | 563 | 140 |
Araneidae | Mangora acalypha (Walckenaer, 1802) | INT | 0 | 138 | 0 | 1 | 18 |
Araneidae | Neoscona crucifera (Lucas, 1838) | INT | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
Clubionidae | Porrhoclubiona decora (Blackwall, 1859) | NAT | 2 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 9 |
Dictynidae | Lathys dentichelis (Simon, 1883) | NAT | 337 | 507 | 151 | 168 | 198 |
Dictynidae | Nigma puella (Simon, 1870) | INT | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
Dysderidae | Dysdera crocata C. L. Koch, 1838 | INT | 0 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 0 |
Cheiracanthiidae |
Cheiracanthium erraticum (Walckenaer, 1802) | INT | 51 | 7 | 20 | 0 | 27 |
Linyphiidae | Acorigone acoreensis (Wunderlich, 1992) | END | 5 | 4 | 11 | 1 | 0 |
Linyphiidae | Agyneta decora (O.P.-Cambridge, 1871) | INT | 0 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 2 |
Linyphiidae | Canariphantes acoreensis (Wunderlich, 1992) | END | 12 | 17 | 91 | 0 | 0 |
Linyphiidae | Erigone atra Blackwall, 1833 | INT | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
Linyphiidae | Erigone autumnalis Emerton, 1882 | INT | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Linyphiidae | Erigone dentipalpis (Wider, 1834) | INT | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
Linyphiidae | Meioneta fuscipalpa (C.L. Koch, 1836) | INT | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 |
Linyphiidae | Mermessus bryantae (Ivie & Barrows, 1935) | INT | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Linyphiidae | Mermessus fradeorum (Berland, 1932) | INT | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 |
Linyphiidae | Microlinyphia johnsoni (Blackwall, 1859) | NAT | 16 | 19 | 12 | 16 | 0 |
Linyphiidae | Minicia floresensis Wunderlich, 1992 | END | 1 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 7 |
Linyphiidae | Neriene clathrata (Sundevall, 1830) | INT | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
Linyphiidae | Oedothorax fuscus (Blackwall, 1834) | INT | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Linyphiidae | Palliduphantes schmitzi (Kulczynski, 1899) | NAT | 2 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 |
Linyphiidae | Porrhomma borgesi Wunderlich, 2008 | END | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
Linyphiidae | Prinerigone vagans (Audouin, 1826) | INT | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 4 |
Linyphiidae | Savigniorrhipis acoreensis Wunderlich, 1992 | END | 430 | 537 | 384 | 60 | 184 |
Linyphiidae | Tenuiphantes miguelensis (Wunderlich, 1992) | NAT | 97 | 22 | 20 | 0 | 46 |
Linyphiidae | Tenuiphantes tenuis (Blackwall, 1852) | INT | 3 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 14 |
Linyphiidae | Walckenaeria grandis (Wunderlich, 1992) | END | 1 | 0 | 11 | 0 | 0 |
Lycosidae | Pardosa acorensis Simon, 1883 | END | 3 | 4 | 45 | 0 | 72 |
Mimetidae | Ero furcata (Villers, 1789) | INT | 4 | 23 | 0 | 2 | 10 |
Pisauridae | Pisaura acoreensis Wunderlich, 1992 | END | 3 | 13 | 57 | 8 | 21 |
Salticidae | Macaroeris cata (Blackwall, 1867) | NAT | 97 | 55 | 16 | 28 | 63 |
Salticidae | Macaroeris diligens (Blackwall, 1867) | NAT | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
Salticidae | Neon acoreensis Wunderlich, 2008 | END | 0 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 0 |
Tetragnathidae | Metellina merianae (Scopoli, 1763) | INT | 5 | 146 | 15 | 35 | 78 |
Tetragnathidae | Sancus acoreensis (Wunderlich, 1992) | END | 831 | 621 | 974 | 165 | 505 |
Theridiidae | Cryptachaea blattea (Urquhart, 1886) | INT | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
Theridiidae | Lasaeola oceanica Simon, 1883 | END | 53 | 105 | 4 | 2 | 6 |
Theridiidae | Rhomphaea nasica (Simon, 1873) | INT | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 |
Theridiidae | Rugathodes acoreensis Wunderlich, 1992 | END | 61 | 263 | 304 | 103 | 68 |
Theridiidae | Steatoda nobilis (Thorell, 1875) | INT | 1 | 6 | 1 | 9 | 11 |
Theridiidae | Theridion musivivum Schmidt, 1956 | NAT | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
Thomisidae | Xysticus cor Canestrini, 1873 | NAT | 27 | 42 | 36 | 4 | 46 |
Thomisidae | Xysticus nubilus Simon, 1875 | INT | 0 | 0 | 32 | 0 | 0 |
The five most abundant species were Gibbaranea occidentalis Wunderlich, 1989 (3635 specimens) (endemic), Sancus acoreensis (Wunderlich, 1992) (3096 specimens) (endemic), Savigniorrhipis acoreensis Wunderlich, 1992 (1595 specimens) (endemic), Lathys dentichelis (Simon, 1883) (1361 specimens) (native non-endemic) and Rugathodes acoreensis Wunderlich, 1992 (799 specimens) (endemic). These five species accounted for 84% of all individuals of the total. The most abundant introduced species was Metellina merianae Scopoli, 1763 with 279 specimens.
This database will be used in future studies where the variation of the spider communites amongst the various sites will be tested against variables that are known to be relevant for understanding the impact of touristic activities, such as the distance to the trail head and the distance from the sampling area to the nearest trail point. We will use GLMMs, where the trail identity will be used as random effect and the edge effect will be added as an independent variable in order to avoid spurious results. This will respond to the questions of whether there is a detectable effect of recreational activities on the spiders community structure and what is contributing to this ecological shift.
Contrary to Canary Islands and Madeira, the Azorean Archipelago has not yet experienced continuous high levels of visitation. This sampling was made at the early times of a noticeably higher touristic pressure in the Azores and will allow for future monitoring events to have a comparable baseline and better isolate the touristic factors from others, thus improving the management outlook on tourism's ecological effects on spider communities.
This research was supported by a Ph.D. scholarship from the Azores Governmentto to Rui Carvalho (DRCT M3.1.a/F/135/2015). Data was obtained mostly during the Rui Carvalho DRCT scholarship, but some samples are from a previous project (ERA-Net NetBiome research framework, financed through Portuguese FCT-NETBIOME ISLANDBIODIV grant 0003/2011). Open access was funded by FEDER in 85% and by Azorean Public funds by 15% through Operational Programme Azores 2020, under the project AZORESBIOPORTAL –PORBIOTA (ACORES-01-0145-FEDER-000072)
RC, PC and PAVB conceived the study design and the sampling programme. RC, PAVB, CR, MTF, LLL, MB, JMO, ARP and FP performed spider sampling. PAVB and RC performed spider identification. RC analysed the data and led the writing. All authors contributed to the final version of the manuscript.