Biodiversity Data Journal :
Data Paper (Biosciences)
|
Corresponding author: Xiaolei Huang (huangxl@fafu.edu.cn)
Academic editor: Laurence Livermore
Received: 15 Feb 2021 | Accepted: 21 Jun 2021 | Published: 29 Jun 2021
© 2021 Junjie Li, Huanhuan Liu, Yangxue Wu, Longqin Ye, Xiaolei Huang
This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Citation:
Li J, Liu H, Wu Y, Ye L, Huang X (2021) A dataset on type specimens of hemipteran insects in China. Biodiversity Data Journal 9: e64443. https://doi.org/10.3897/BDJ.9.e64443
|
Type specimens are valuable resources for investigating and exploring biodiversity on Earth, which has high academic and conservation value. Hemipteran insects are one of the most important and diverse groups in Insecta and their type specimens have important reference value for many research fields. So far, the data on the type specimens of the Hemiptera in China have not been fully collated.
Through extensive literature review, we have constructed a dataset of type specimens for the new species of hemipteran insects in China published from 1950 to 2017, which includes the data such as collection date, specimen gender, preservation institution and geographical distribution. A total of 6,583 type specimen records were collected, covering 3,783 new species belonging to 1,299 genera and 88 families. This dataset can support the international community in conducting research on taxonomy, biodiversity, evolution and pest management.
type specimen, Hemiptera, biodiversity, distribution, China
Type specimens include name bearing specimens that have been designated by researchers when describing and publishing new species, such as holotypes and syntypes, which can be used as standard references for subsequent taxonomic investigation (
Hemiptera (Arthropoda: Insecta) is not only the largest hemimetabolous order in the Insecta (
The aim of this work is to compile the dataset of type specimens of the Hemiptera in China.
The collection date, specimen gender, preservation institution, geographical distribution and other related information of the holotypes, allotypes and paratypes for species of Hemiptera have been recorded in detail from various data sources, including scientific journals, serial publications, local chronicles, monographs and books. We have compiled almost all type specimen information for hemipteran insects published from 1950 to 2017 in China. The final dataset contains 6,583 records of 3,783 Hemiptera belonging to 1,299 genera and 88 families (Table
Families | No. of species | Percentage of all species (%) | No. of genera | Percentage of all genera (%) |
Cicadellidae | 1120 | 29.61 | 256 | 19.71 |
Miridae | 244 | 6.45 | 73 | 5.62 |
Aphididae | 233 | 6.16 | 112 | 8.62 |
Psyllidae | 221 | 5.84 | 33 | 2.54 |
Membracidae | 179 | 4.73 | 41 | 3.16 |
Delphacidae | 169 | 4.47 | 88 | 6.77 |
Reduviidae | 154 | 4.07 | 66 | 5.08 |
Coreidae | 128 | 3.38 | 56 | 4.31 |
Diaspididae | 109 | 2.88 | 49 | 3.77 |
Pentatomidae | 109 | 2.88 | 53 | 4.08 |
Lygaeidae | 88 | 2.33 | 40 | 3.08 |
Triozidae | 86 | 2.27 | 20 | 1.54 |
Cicadidae | 75 | 1.98 | 34 | 2.62 |
Urostylidae | 56 | 1.48 | 5 | 0.38 |
Aradidae | 55 | 1.45 | 24 | 1.85 |
Pseudococcidae | 53 | 1.4 | 32 | 2.46 |
Pemphigidae | 46 | 1.22 | 20 | 1.54 |
Nabidae | 42 | 1.11 | 11 | 0.85 |
Anthocoridae | 37 | 0.98 | 6 | 0.46 |
Plataspidae | 36 | 0.95 | 9 | 0.69 |
Lachnidae | 35 | 0.93 | 8 | 0.62 |
Tingidae | 34 | 0.9 | 21 | 1.62 |
Acanthosomatidae | 29 | 0.77 | 7 | 0.54 |
Callaphididae | 28 | 0.74 | 15 | 1.15 |
Aphrophoridae | 22 | 0.58 | 5 | 0.38 |
Issidae | 21 | 0.56 | 10 | 0.77 |
Veliidae | 21 | 0.56 | 5 | 0.38 |
Drepanosiphidae | 18 | 0.48 | 11 | 0.85 |
Achilidae | 18 | 0.48 | 5 | 0.38 |
Aphalaridae | 17 | 0.45 | 11 | 0.85 |
Chaitophoridae | 17 | 0.45 | 3 | 0.23 |
Cercopidae | 15 | 0.4 | 10 | 0.77 |
Derbidae | 15 | 0.4 | 8 | 0.62 |
Cydnidae | 14 | 0.37 | 8 | 0.62 |
Ricaniidae | 14 | 0.37 | 7 | 0.54 |
Berytidae | 13 | 0.34 | 5 | 0.38 |
Margarodidae | 13 | 0.34 | 4 | 0.31 |
Hormaphididae | 12 | 0.32 | 10 | 0.77 |
Tropiduchidae | 12 | 0.32 | 7 | 0.54 |
Asterolecaniidae | 10 | 0.26 | 5 | 0.38 |
Greenideidae | 10 | 0.26 | 4 | 0.31 |
Flatidae | 9 | 0.24 | 7 | 0.54 |
Coccidae | 9 | 0.24 | 7 | 0.54 |
Kinnaridae | 7 | 0.19 | 2 | 0.15 |
Dictyopharidae | 7 | 0.19 | 5 | 0.38 |
Adelgidae | 6 | 0.16 | 4 | 0.31 |
Cixiidae | 6 | 0.16 | 5 | 0.38 |
Eurybrachidae | 6 | 0.16 | 1 | 0.08 |
Machaerotidae | 6 | 0.16 | 2 | 0.15 |
Piesmatidae | 6 | 0.16 | 1 | 0.08 |
Aleyrodidae | 5 | 0.13 | 5 | 0.38 |
Fulgoridae | 5 | 0.13 | 3 | 0.23 |
Pyrrhocoridae | 5 | 0.13 | 5 | 0.38 |
Kermesidae | 5 | 0.13 | 2 | 0.15 |
Aphelocheiridae | 4 | 0.11 | 1 | 0.08 |
Calophyidae | 4 | 0.11 | 2 | 0.15 |
Ceratocombidae | 4 | 0.11 | 1 | 0.08 |
Schizopteridae | 4 | 0.11 | 4 | 0.31 |
Kerriidae | 4 | 0.11 | 4 | 0.31 |
Velocipedidae | 4 | 0.11 | 1 | 0.08 |
Eriococcidae | 3 | 0.08 | 3 | 0.23 |
Gerridae | 3 | 0.08 | 2 | 0.15 |
Lecaniodiaspididae | 3 | 0.08 | 3 | 0.23 |
Meenoplidae | 3 | 0.08 | 2 | 0.15 |
Thelaxidae | 3 | 0.08 | 1 | 0.08 |
Rhyparochromidae | 3 | 0.08 | 1 | 0.08 |
Nogodinidae | 3 | 0.08 | 1 | 0.08 |
Lophopidae | 2 | 0.05 | 2 | 0.15 |
Caliscelidae | 2 | 0.05 | 1 | 0.08 |
Saldidae | 2 | 0.05 | 2 | 0.15 |
Stenocephalidae | 2 | 0.05 | 2 | 0.15 |
Scutelleridae | 2 | 0.05 | 2 | 0.15 |
Eubranchidae | 2 | 0.05 | 2 | 0.15 |
Rhophalidae | 2 | 0.05 | 2 | 0.15 |
Notonectidae | 1 | 0.03 | 1 | 0.08 |
Cerococcidae | 1 | 0.03 | 1 | 0.08 |
Naucoridae | 1 | 0.03 | 1 | 0.08 |
Anoeciidae | 1 | 0.03 | 1 | 0.08 |
Leptopodidae | 1 | 0.03 | 1 | 0.08 |
Isometopidae | 1 | 0.03 | 1 | 0.08 |
Liviidae | 1 | 0.03 | 1 | 0.08 |
Lyctocoridae | 1 | 0.03 | 1 | 0.08 |
Mindaridae | 1 | 0.03 | 1 | 0.08 |
Kuwaniidae | 1 | 0.03 | 1 | 0.08 |
Aclerdidae | 1 | 0.03 | 1 | 0.08 |
Tessaratomidae | 1 | 0.03 | 1 | 0.08 |
Phloeomyzidae | 1 | 0.03 | 1 | 0.08 |
Colobathristidae | 1 | 0.03 | 1 | 0.08 |
Total | 3783 | 100 | 1299 | 100 |
The number of holotypes of Hemipteran species preserved by different preservation institutions.
Preservation institution of Holotype | Country | No. of species | Percentage (%) |
IZAS | China | 911 | 25.18 |
NWAFU | China | 590 | 16.31 |
NKU | China | 534 | 14.76 |
CAU | China | 409 | 11.3 |
GU | China | 387 | 10.7 |
AAU | China | 210 | 5.8 |
TNHM | China | 120 | 3.32 |
NJAU | China | 101 | 2.79 |
IPPE | China | 71 | 1.96 |
IMNU | China | 53 | 1.46 |
SAU | China | 38 | 1.05 |
SYSU | China | 37 | 1.02 |
KZAS | China | 13 | 0.36 |
BFUC | China | 13 | 0.36 |
NWIPB | China | 12 | 0.33 |
ZJAFU | China | 10 | 0.28 |
SDAU | China | 8 | 0.22 |
JXAU | China | 8 | 0.22 |
BMNH | UK | 7 | 0.19 |
IAPQ | China | 6 | 0.17 |
NMNS | China | 5 | 0.14 |
ZIN | Russia | 4 | 0.11 |
MSTC | China | 4 | 0.11 |
ICSCU | China | 4 | 0.11 |
SAAS | China | 4 | 0.11 |
BJMNH | China | 4 | 0.11 |
FAFU | China | 3 | 0.08 |
SNU | China | 3 | 0.08 |
AHUT | China | 3 | 0.08 |
INRSC | China | 3 | 0.08 |
ISCK | China | 3 | 0.08 |
SWU | China | 2 | 0.06 |
RIRI | China | 2 | 0.06 |
HBAU | China | 2 | 0.06 |
ZISP | Russia | 2 | 0.06 |
ANIC | Australia | 2 | 0.06 |
SU | China | 1 | 0.03 |
SCAU | China | 1 | 0.03 |
AHFP | China | 1 | 0.03 |
HBAF | China | 1 | 0.03 |
FDYN | China | 1 | 0.03 |
FJAS | China | 1 | 0.03 |
GZAS | China | 1 | 0.03 |
NMCU | UK | 1 | 0.03 |
HSFB | China | 1 | 0.03 |
HBMN | China | 1 | 0.03 |
HEBNU | China | 1 | 0.03 |
GZAF | China | 1 | 0.03 |
MNHN | France | 1 | 0.03 |
NEFU | China | 1 | 0.03 |
SCU | China | 1 | 0.03 |
YZU | China | 1 | 0.03 |
PCPC | China | 1 | 0.03 |
NHMW | Austria | 1 | 0.03 |
NCHU | China | 1 | 0.03 |
TARI | China | 1 | 0.03 |
CATAS | China | 1 | 0.03 |
YLNU | China | 1 | 0.03 |
PPLS | China | 1 | 0.03 |
IMAU | China | 1 | 0.03 |
PSQS | China | 1 | 0.03 |
NCSU | USA | 1 | 0.03 |
MIZ | Poland | 1 | 0.03 |
IAEAS | China | 1 | 0.03 |
IRSNB | Belgium | 1 | 0.03 |
HUS | Japan | 1 | 0.03 |
Total | 3618 | 100 |
This article provides a detailed description of the data source, structure and processing of the type specimen dataset of the Chinese hemipteran insects and presents the potential reuse value of this dataset. We are committed to making this dataset a dynamic one by following the principles of open science and constantly updating available new records. Through this work, we hope to promote further development of insect data collation and provide assistance to the research of biodiversity and entomology.
Data Sources
The dataset mainly collected the type specimens of Chinese Hemiptera published by domestic and foreign scientists from 1950 to 2017. Our data sources consisted of two parts, one of which is mainly from the book series Catalogue of Insect Type Specimens Deposited in China (
In addition, we also searched relevant literature published from 2000 to 2017 based on the Zoological Records in order to include recent species records and make the dataset more comprehensive. The search entry used was (new speci* or new tax*) and (Hemiptera or Homoptera) and (China). We retrieved 371 literature records, with information including the authors, title, abstract, publication date and journal information of each record. Based on these records, we obtained complete published article for subsequent specimen data collection. There were eight records about extinct species and one without a new species description, which was excluded from data collection.
Data collection and processing
We searched and collected the type specimen information of each new Hemiptera, including the species/subspecies name and its taxonomic status, the year of publication, as well as the gender, distribution, preservation institution and collection date of the holotype, allotype and paratype, respectively. In addition, each row of data was marked with its literature source and literature authors. In the original literature, several items, such as the species name, literature authors, preservation institution and collection date, were expressed in various ways. For example, some species names were with named person, while others were not. The literature authors might include both Chinese and foreign colleagues, and their names were written in different formats. Some names of preservation institutions were abbreviated, while others were with full names. Therefore, for the species names, we standardised them into the form of genus name plus species name. Literature authors were standardised as the last names followed by the initials of given names. The collection date was recorded as year, month and day. We used abbreviations for all preservation institutions for the sake of standardisation and their corresponding full names were shown in Table
Abbreviations and full names of the preservation institutions of type specimens for Hemipteran insects in China.
Abbreviation |
Country |
The full name of the preservation institution |
AAU |
China |
Anhui Agricultural University, Hefei, Anhui, China |
AFNX |
China |
Ningxia Academy of Agriculture and Forestry Sciences, Ningxia, China |
AHFP |
China |
Anhui Forest Pest Control Station, Hefei, Anhui, China |
AHUT |
China |
Anhui University of Technology, Maanshan, Anhui, China |
ANIC |
Australia |
Australian National Insect Collection, CSIRO, Canberra, Australia |
BFUC |
China |
Insect Collection, the Department of Forestry Protection, Beijing Forestry University, Beijing, China |
BJMNH |
China |
Beijing Museum of Nature History, Beijing, China |
BMHU |
USA |
Bhopal Museum, Hawaii, USA |
BMNH |
UK |
Natural History Museum, London, UK |
BPBM |
USA |
Bernice P. Bishop Museum, Honolulu, Hawaii, USA |
CATAS |
China |
Chinese Academy of Tropical Agricultural Sciences Environment and Plant Protection Institute, Haikou, Hainan, China |
CAU |
China |
Department of Entomology, China Agricultural University, Beijing, China |
CDFA |
USA |
California Department of Food and Agriculture, Sacramento, CA, USA |
CEHI |
Austria |
Collection Ernst Heiss, Tiroler Landesmuseum, Innsbruck, Austria |
CLHC |
China |
Collection of Li He, Chengdu, China |
FAFU |
China |
College of Plant Protection, Fujian Agriculture Forestry University, Fuzhou, Fujian, China |
FAHN |
China |
Hunan Academy of Forestry, Changsha, Hunan, China |
FDYN |
China |
The Forestry Department of Yunnan Province, Kunming, Yunnan, China |
FJAS |
China |
Institute of Entomology, Fujian Agriculture of Science, Fuzhou, Fujian, China |
GU |
China |
Guizhou University, Guiyang, Guizhou, China |
GXAS |
China |
Biological Research Laboratory, Guangxi Academy of Sciences, Nanning, Guangxi, China |
GZAF |
China |
Guizhou Academy of Forestry, Guiyang, Guizhou, China |
GZAS |
China |
Guizhou Academy of Sciences, Guiyang, Guizhou, China |
HBAF |
China |
Shijiazhuang Orchard Research Institute, Hebei Academy of Agriculture and Forestry Sciences, Shijiazhuang, Hebei, China |
HBAU |
China |
Agricultural University of Huabei, Baoding, Hebei, China |
HBMN |
China |
Museum of Natural History, Harbin, Heilongjiang, China |
HBU |
China |
Hebei University, Baoding, China |
HEBNU |
China |
Hebei Normal University, Shijiazhuang, Hebei, China |
HSFB |
China |
Huangshan City Forestry Bureau of Anhui Province, Huangshan, Anhui, China |
HUS |
Japan |
Laboratory of Systematic Entomology, Hokkaido University, Sapporo, Japan |
IAEAS |
China |
Shenyang Institute of Applied Ecology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shenyang, Liaoning, China |
IAPQ |
China |
Institute of Animal and Plant Quarantine, Yunnan, China |
ICSCU |
China |
Insect Collection, Gold Mantis School of Architecture and Urban Environment, Soochow University, Suzhou, Jiangsu, China |
IMAU |
China |
Inner Mongolia College of Forestry, Hohhot, Inner Mongolia, China |
IMNU |
China |
Inner Mongolia Normal University, Hohhot, Inner Mongolia, China |
INRSC |
China |
Institute for Natural Resources in Sichuan, Chengdu, Sichuan, China |
IPPE |
China |
Shanghai Institute of Biological Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shanghai, China |
IRSNB |
Belgium |
The Institut royal des Sciences naturelles de Belgique, Bruxelles, Belgium |
IRTUA |
Japan |
Laboratory of Insect Resources, Faculty of Agriculture, Tokyo University of Agriculture, Atsugi, Japan |
ISCK |
China |
The Institute of South China Karst, Guizhou Normal University, Guiyang, Guizhou, China |
IZAS |
China |
Institute of Zoology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China |
JXAU |
China |
Jiangxi Agricultural University, Nanchang, Jiangxi, China |
KZAS |
China |
Kunming Institute of Zoology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Kunming, Yunnan, China |
MIZ |
Poland |
Museum and Institute of Zoology PAS, Warsaw, Poland |
MNHN |
France |
The Muséum national d’Histoire naturelle, Paris, France |
MNHU |
Germany |
Museum fuÈr Naturkunde der Humboldt-UniversitaÈt, Berlin, Germany |
MSTC |
China |
Anhui Maanshan Science and Technology Commission, Maanshan, Anhui, China |
NCHU |
China |
National Chung Hsing University, Taichung, Taiwan, China |
NCSU |
USA |
North Carolina State University Insect Collection, Raleigh, North Carolina, USA |
NCTN |
Netherlands |
Nieser and Chen Collection, Tiel, The Netherlands |
NEFU |
China |
Institute of Entomology, College of Forestry, Northeast Forestry University, Harbin, Heilongjiang, China |
NHMW |
Austria |
Naturehistorisches Museum in Wien, Wien, Austria |
NJAU |
China |
Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing, Jiangsu, China |
NKU |
China |
Institute of Entomology, College of Life Sciences, Nankai University, Tianjin, China |
NMCU |
UK |
National Museum of Cardiff, UK |
NMNS |
China |
National Museum of Natural Science, Taichung, Taiwan, China |
NWAFU |
China |
Entomological Museum of Northwest A&F University, Yangling, Shaanxi, China |
NWIPB |
China |
Northwest Institute of Plateau Biology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Xining, Qinghai, China |
PCPC |
China |
Private Collection of Pingping Chen, Beijing, China |
PPLS |
China |
Plant Protection Laboratory of Shenyang Garden Science Institute, Shenyang, Liaoning, China |
PSQS |
China |
The Plant Protection Station of Qiannan State, Guizhou, China |
RIRI |
China |
Research Institute of Resource Insects, Chinese Academy of Forestry, Kunming, Yunnan, China |
RMNUS |
Singapore |
Zoological Reference Collection, Raffles Museum of Biodiversity Research, National University of Singapore, Singapore |
SAAS |
China |
College of Plant protection, Sichuan Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Chengdu, Sichuan, China |
SAU |
China |
Insect Collection of Shanxi Agricultural University, Taigu, Shanxi, China |
SCAU |
China |
South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China |
SCU |
China |
Animal Herbarium, College of Life Sciences, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China |
SDAU |
China |
The Research Center of Scale Insects, Shandong Agricultural University, Tai’an, Shandong, China |
SHBG |
China |
Shanghai Botanical Garden, Shanghai, China |
SNU |
China |
Shaanxi Normal University, Xi’an, Shanxi , China |
SU |
China |
Department of horticultural science and technology of Soochow University, Suzhou, Jiangsu, China |
SWU |
China |
Southwest University, Chongqing, China |
SYSU |
China |
Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China |
TARI |
China |
Taiwan Agricultural Research Institute, Taichung, Taiwan, China |
TNHM |
China |
Tianjin Natural History Museum, Tianjin, China |
USNM |
USA |
National Museum of Natural History, Washington D.C., USA |
XIEG |
China |
Xinjiang Institute of Ecology and Geography, Chinese Academy of Sciences, China |
YIB |
Russia |
Institute for Biological Problems of Cryolithozone RAS, Yakutsk, Russia |
YLNU |
China |
College of Life Sciences, Yulin Normal University, Yulin, Guangxi ,China |
YZU |
China |
Insect Collection of Yangzhou University, Yangzhou, Jiangsu, China |
ZIN |
Russia |
Russian Academy of Sciences, Zoological Institute, St.Petersburg, Russia |
ZISP |
Russia |
The Zoological Institute RAS, St. Petersburg, Russia |
ZJAFU |
China |
The Research Center of Scale Insects, Zhejiang A&F University, Lin’an, Zhejiang, China |
ZSI |
India |
Zoological Survey of India |
After the completion of the original data collection, we checked all data records individually and standardised the format. In order to investigate whether the taxonomic information of each species/subspecies has changed, we checked the species/subspecies name and taxonomic status of each species/subspecies through the Catalogue of Life (http://www.catalogueoflife.org) and some other taxonomic websites for specific groups of Hemiptera, such as the Aphid Species File (http://aphid.speciesfile.org), the Systematic Database of the Scale Insects of the World (http://scalenet.info/catalogue), the Coreoidea Species File (http://Coreoidea.SpeciesFile.org) and the Lygaeoidea Species File (http://Lygaeoidea.speciesfile.org). If the species/subspecies name and its taxonomic status changed, we recorded them in corresponding fields of the dataset and the results showed that 11.9% of the species/subspecies names have changed since their original description. These changes are important records representing the taxonomic status of these species in different historical periods. In addition, we also checked and validated the geographical locations of the type specimens and their corresponding latitudes and longitudes in detail, based on original literature.
China
3°51′N-53°33′N; 73°33′E-135°05′E.
Type specimens information for a total of 3,783 species of Hemiptera belonging to 1,299 genera and 88 families was collected.
Time range: 1950-2017
The final dataset is presented in Suppl. material
Column label | Column description |
---|---|
ID | The unique number for each record. |
Family | Family name of species/subspecies. |
Family change | If the taxonomic status of a species/subspecies has changed in history, this indicates its current family name. |
Genus | Genus name of species/subspecies. |
Genus change | If the taxonomic status of a species/subspecies has changed in history, this indicates its current genus name. |
Species/Subspecies name | The name of species/subspecies in a uniform format. |
Species/Subspecies name change | If the name of a species/subspecies has changed in history, this indicates its current name. |
Species/Subspecies names in the original literature | Species/Subspecies names recorded with various formats in original literature. |
Published year | The year in which the species/subspecies was published. |
Gender of holotype | The gender of the holotype used for species/subspecies description. This data item follows the original literature. |
Distribution of holotype | The geographical location of the holotype. |
Latitude of holotype | The latitude of the geographical location of the holotype. |
Longitude of holotype | The Longitude of the geographical location of the holotype. |
Collection time of holotype | Collection time of the holotype in a uniform format. |
Preservation institution of holotype | The abbreviation for the preservation institution of the holotype. |
Gender of allotype | The gender of the allotype used for species/subspecies description. This data item follows the original literature. |
Distribution of allotype | The geographical location of the allotype. |
Latitude of allotype | The latitude of the geographical location of the allotype. |
Longitude of allotype | The longitude of the geographical location of the allotype. |
Collection time of allotype | Collection time of the allotype in a uniform format. |
Preservation institution of allotype | The abbreviation for the preservation institution of the allotype. |
Gender of paratype | The gender of the paratype used for species/subspecies description. This data item follow the original literature. |
Distribution of paratype | The geographical location of the paratype. |
Latitude of paratype | The latitude of the geographical location of the paratype. |
Longitude of paratype | The longitude of the geographical location of the paratype. |
Collection time of paratype | Collection time of the paratype in a uniform format. |
Preservation institution of paratype | The abbreviation for the preservation institution of the paratype. |
Literature | The literature source of the species/subspecies, which is uniformly presented in English. If a journal name has been changed, its new name is reserved. |
Original literature | Original literature information without modification. |
Literature authors | The authors of the Literature. |
This study was supported by National Key R&D Program of China (2016YFE0203100) and Fujian Provincial Department of Science & Technology (2015J06005).
X.H. and J.L. conceived and designed the study. J.L., H.L., Y.W. and L.Y. performed the data collection and collation. J.L. and X.H. executed the data analysis and drafted the manuscript. X.H. contributed resources during the study.