Biodiversity Data Journal :
Single Taxon Treatment
|
Corresponding author: Yang Zhong (hubeispider@aliyun.com)
Academic editor: Yanfeng Tong
Received: 16 Apr 2021 | Accepted: 31 May 2021 | Published: 04 Jun 2021
© 2021 Chaohui Cai, Yejie Lin, Yang Zhong
This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Citation:
Cai C, Lin Y, Zhong Y (2021) Description of a new species of Thelcticopis Karsch (Araneae, Sparassidae) from Guangxi Province, China. Biodiversity Data Journal 9: e67437. https://doi.org/10.3897/BDJ.9.e67437
|
Due to its special ways of hiding and lifestyle, Thelcticopis is a type of spider that is very difficult to collect. In 2018, we collected two huntsman spiders in Guangxi. After comparison with other Thelcticopis species, such as anterior median eye larger than other eyes, they were found to belong to the genus of Thelcticopis.
Currently, four Thelcticopis species are reported from China, T. severa (L. Koch, 1875), T. zhengi Liu, Li & Jäger, 2010, T. dahanensis Zhu & Zhong, 2020 and T. unciformis Zhu & Zhong, 2020. They are mainly distributed in the tropical or subtropical areas of China (Fujian, Guangdong, Guangxi, Hainan, Hongkong, Hunan, Taiwan, Yunnan and Zhejiang). In this paper, we diagnose and describe a new species, Thelcticopis pinmini sp. nov., which was collected from Guangxi Province, China.
biodiversity, huntsman spiders, new species, taxonomy
Thelcticopis Karsch, 1884 belongs to the subfamliy Sparianthinae Simon, 1897 of the family Sparassidae Bertkau, 1872 (
Specimens were examined and measured with a Leica M205C stereomicroscope. Positions of the tegular appendages are given according to clock positions, based on the left palp in ventral view. Male palps were examined after dissection and removal from the spiders’ bodies, the epigynes were examined and illustrated after dissection. Female copulatory organs were cleared in proteinase K at 56°C to dissolve non-chitinous tissues. All photographs were captured with an Olympus C7070 wide zoom digital camera (7.1 megapixels), mounted on an Olympus SZX12 dissecting microscope and assembled using Helicon Focus 7.0 image stacking software. Photographic images were then edited, using Adobe Photoshop CC 2015. Most of the hairs and macrosetae were generally not identified in the palp and epigyne drawings. All specimens are deposited in the Centre for Behavioural Ecology and Evolution, College of Life Sciences, Hubei University, Wuhan, China (CBEE).
Leg measurements in mm are shown as: total length (femur, patella, tibia, metatarsus, tarsus). Number of spines is listed for each segment in the following order: prolateral, dorsal, retrolateral, ventral (in femora and patellae, ventral spines are absent and fourth digit is omitted in the spination formula). Abbreviations: C = conductor; dRTA = dorsal branch of RTA; E = embolus; EA = embolic apophysis; FD = fertilisation duct; TA = tegular apophysis; MS = median septum; mRTA = median branch of RTA; RTA = retrolateral tibial apophysis; S = spermatheca; SP = spermophore; vRTA = ventral branch of RTA.
Male. PL 3.5, PW 3.6, AW 1.6, OL 2.8, OW 2.6. Eyes: AME 0.24, ALE 0.13, PME 0.13, PLE 0.16, AME–AME 0.22, AME–ALE 0.23, PME–PME 0.46, PME–PLE 0.32, AME–PME 0.19, ALE–PLE 0.09, CH AME 0.10, CH ALE 0.22. Spination: Palp: 131, 101, 0002; Fe: I 210, II–IV 311; Pa: I–IV 000; Ti: I–II 2028, III–IV 2026; Mt: I–II 0002, III–IV 2024. Measurements of palp and legs: Palp 5.4 (1.3, 0.7, 1.6, –, 1.8), I 11.7 (3.6, 1.8, 3.1, 2.5, 0.7), II 12.7 (4.1, 2.1, 3.2, 2.6, 0.7), III 10.4 (2.9, 1.4, 2.8, 2.5, 0.8), IV 10.1 (2.9, 1.3, 2.7, 2.4, 0.8). Leg formula: 2-1-3-4. Cheliceral furrow with three anterior and three posterior teeth, without denticles (Fig.
Thelcticopis pinmini sp. nov. A. Palp, left, ventral view; B. Palp, prolateral view; C. Palp, retrolateral view; D. Epigyne, ventral view; E. Vulva, dorsal view. Abbreviations: C—conductor, E—embolus, EA—embolic apophysis, FD—fertilisation duct, MS—median septum, S—spermatheca, SP—spermophore, TA—tegular apophysis. Red arrow: initial part of internal duct system. Scale bars: 0.5 mm.
Thelcticopis pinmini sp. nov. A. Palp, left, prolateral view; B. Palp, left, retrolateral view; C. Left male palpal tibia, dorsal view; D. Epigyne, ventral view; E. Vulva, dorsal view. Abbreviations: dRTA—dorsal branch of RTA, mRTA—median branch of RTA, vRTA—ventral branch of RTA. Scale bars: 0.5 mm.
Palp as in diagnosis. Cymbium approximately two times longer than tibia in ventral view. Embolus arising from tegulum at 9-o’clock-position, with embolic tip distinctly wider than embolic apophysis. Conductor arising from tegulum in 12-o’clock-position. Tegular apophysis spoon-shaped, best seen in ventral view. Spermophore distinctly curved in retrolateral view. RTA arising medially from tibia, with three apices best seen in dorsal view. dRTA distinctly curved, U-shaped in prolateral view (Fig.
Female. PL 3.6, PW 3.5, AW 1.6, OL 4.7, OW 3.2. Eyes: AME 0.22, ALE 0.18, PME 0.14, PLE 0.19, AME–AME 0.20, AME–ALE 0.23, PME–PME 0.39, PME–PLE 0.36, AME–PME 0.22, ALE–PLE 0.08, CH AME 0.18, CH ALE 0.22. Spination: Palp: 131, 101, 2221, 1011; Fe: I–II 220 III–IV 120; Pa: I–IV 000; Ti: I–II 0008, III 0006, IV 0004; Mt: I–III 0002, IV 1014. Measurements of palp and legs: Palp 3.2 (0.9, 0.6, 0.7, –, 1.0), I 8.9 (2.9, 1.5, 2.4, 1.5, 0.6), II 9.6 (3.2, 1.7, 2.6, 1.5, 0.6), III 8.4 (2.9, 1.4, 2.0, 1.5, 0.6), IV 8.7 (2.9, 1.3, 2.4, 1.4, 0.7). Leg formula: 2-1-4-3. Cheliceral furrow with three anterior and four posterior teeth, without denticles (Fig.
Copulatory organs as in diagnosis. Epigynal field wider than long with one slit sensillum on each side of the epigynal field. Median septum medially about 1/2 of epigynal's width, with two humps on the posterior part. Posterior margin with two hooks, each pointing medially. Both sides of internal duct sustem separated. Fertilisation ducts arising posterior-laterally (Fig.
Colouration in ethanol: as in male, but dorsal opisthosoma yellowish-brown with wide dark spots (Fig.
Male of this species can be distinguished from the remaining species of the genus by its palps with embolic apophysis and embolus distally with an obvious crack (Fig.
The specific name is dedicated to Mr Pinmin Li for his kind instructions on our collection of huntsman spiders; name in the genitive case.
The manuscript benefitted greatly from comments by Drs. Peter Jäger (Senckenberg Research Institute and Museum, Germany) and Jie Liu (Hubei University, China). We are especially grateful to Yanfeng Tong (Shenyang Normal University, China), the subject editor of this manuscript. This study was financially supported by the National Natural Sciences Foundation of China (NSFC-32000303), Natural Sciences Foundation of Hubei Province (2019CFB248) and a PhD grant from Hubei University Science and Technology (BK201811).