Biodiversity Data Journal :
Taxonomic Paper
|
Corresponding author: Yuehua Song (songyuehua@163.com)
Academic editor: Colin Favret
Received: 29 Apr 2021 | Accepted: 26 May 2021 | Published: 03 Jun 2021
© 2021 Weiwen Tan, Jia Jiang, Yuehua Song
This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Citation:
Tan W, Jiang J, Song Y (2021) Two new species of the genus Anufrievia Dworakowska from China (Hemiptera: Cicadellidae: Typhlocybinae). Biodiversity Data Journal 9: e68043. https://doi.org/10.3897/BDJ.9.e68043
|
|
The leafhopper genus Anufrievia Dworakowska, 1970 includes 33 species and is widely distributed in China, Korea, South Korea, Japan, Nepal, India, Thailand and Vietnam.
Two new species found at Bijie City and Shibing County, Guizhou Province, China are described and illustrated, A. crispata sp. nov. and A. confluensa sp. nov. A key to distinguish the Chinese species of the genus is given.
Homoptera, Auchenorrhyncha, Erythroneurini, taxonomy, leafhopper
The leafhopper genus Anufrievia Dworakowska, 1970 belongs to the tribe Erythroneurini of Typhlocybinae, with Anufrievia rolikae Dworakowska, 1970 as its type species (
The characteristics of Anufrievia genus are as follows. Body yellow or white, often with brown markings or diffuse patterns. Head slightly narrower than pronotum. Length of crown distinctly shorter than inter ocular width. Body length 2.0–4.0 mm (including wing). Vertex anterior margin with minute paired black spots. Male anteclypeus narrow and flat, greyish, brown or black. Pronotum pale, scutellum with dark lateral triangles. Forewing with 4th apical cell small, not reaching apex of forewing, 2nd apical cell nearly rectangular and 1st apical cell broad. Hind wing venation follows typical schemes for Erythroneurini taxa. Abdominal apodemes small and narrow, extended dorsomesad.
Male pygofer lobe with hind margin sleeked or truncated slightly, basal lateral angle usually with macrosetae, sometimes absent and scattered a few fine setae in outer lateral surface. Pygofer dorsal appendage articulated to pygofer lobe with ventral appendage absent. Subgenital plate with some macrosetae in mid-ventral part, broad basally and sometimes terminal half tapering abruptly; row of stout setae along upper margin from sub-base to apex. Apex of style pointed, bifid, foot-shaped or otherwise modified. Aedeagus with dorsal apodeme well developed; aedeagal shaft tubular; gonopore sub-basal to subapical on ventral surface. Connective lateral arms long, Y- or V-shaped.
All specimens in this study were collected by the sweeping-net method. Morphological terminology used follows
Body brownish-black. Head brownish-yellow, with pair of small dark brown apical spots (Fig.
Male genitalia. Pygofer lobe with numerous microsetae distributed densely along dorsal and near posterior margin, few fine setae scattered on lateral surface (Fig.
The new species is named from the Latin word “crispatus”, referring to the serrated marginal lamellae on both sides of shaft apex dorsad (Fig.
This species can be distinguished from other species in this genus by the unique characters of the aedeagus: the aedeagal shaft with serrated marginal lamellae on both sides of apex, pair of small curved processes subapically; short dorsal apodeme and long prearium.
Male length 2.8 mm (including wing). Body yellowish. Vertex brownish-yellow, with pair of small dark brown apical spots (Fig.
Male genitalia. Pygofer lobe broad, with dense microsetae near dorso-caudal margin and several peg-like setae on outer surface (Fig.
The new species is named from the Latin word “confluensus”, referring to the connective stem fused with a long process (Fig.
This species is similar to A. akazu (
Key to males of Anufrievia from China (modified from Cao et al. 2018) |
||
1 | Pygofer dorsal appendage not bifurcate at apex | 2 |
– | Pygofer dorsal appendage bifurcate at apex | 11 |
2 | Aedeagus with large dorsal apodeme | 3 |
– | Aedeagus with small dorsal apodeme | A. crispata sp. nov |
3 | Pre-atrial process not reaching gonopore | 4 |
– | Pre-atrial process reaching or surpassing gonopore | 8 |
4 | Style without distinct apical and subapical teeth | 5 |
– | Style with distinct apical and subapical teeth | 6 |
5 | Style with apex slim (Fig. |
A. symmetrica Cao & Zhang |
– | Style with apex triangular (Fig. |
A. triangulata Cao & Zhang |
6 | Pre-atrial process almost rectangular in ventral view, apex broad (Fig. |
A. quadrata Cao & Zhang |
– | Pre-atrial process narrowing apically, apex pointed | 7 |
7 | Style with subapical tooth equal in length to apical tooth (Fig. |
A. adaucta Cao & Zhang |
– | Style with subapical tooth shorter than apical tooth (Fig. |
A. sphenoides Yang & Zhang |
8 | Aedeagal shaft with pair of apical processes | 9 |
– | Aedeagal shaft without any apical process | A. confluensa sp. nov |
9 | Aedeagal apical processes arched medially in ventral view (Fig. |
A. arcuata Yang & Zhang |
– | Aedeagal apical processes slightly curved in ventral view | 10 |
10 | Aedeagal shaft with base slim, slightly wider than apex (Fig. |
A. zelta Dworakowska |
– | Aedeagal shaft with base broad, much wider than apex | 11 |
11 | Aedeagal shaft constricted sub-basally (Fig. |
A. jinghongensis Cao & Zhang |
– | Aedeagal shaft not constricted sub-basally | 12 |
12 | Style with apical tooth extremely small, aedeagal shaft straight (Fig. |
A. subdentata Yang & Zhang |
– | Style with apical tooth relatively long, aedeagal shaft curved dorsad | A. ciconia Dworakowska |
13 | Aedeagal shaft with processes near middle (Fig. |
A. triprocessa Yang & Zhang |
– | Aedeagal shaft without process near middle | 14 |
14 | Apex of style serrated at middle | 15 |
– | Apex of style smooth at middle | 18 |
15 | Upper tooth of pygofer dorsal appendage much shorter than lower one (Fig. |
A. bauhinicola Dworakowska & Viraktamath |
– | Upper tooth of pygofer dorsal appendage subequal to or longer than lower one | 16 |
16 | Upper tooth of pygofer dorsal appendage longer than lower one (Fig. |
A. expansa Cao & Zhang |
– | Upper tooth of pygofer dorsal appendage almost as long as lower one | 17 |
17 | Apex of pre-atrial process rounded, with one side serrated (Fig. |
A. plana Yang & Zhang |
– | Apex of pre-atrial process truncate, with both sides smooth (Fig. |
A. curva Yang & Zhang |
18 | Ventral margin of aedeagal shaft protruded subapically in lateral view | 19 |
– | Ventral margin of aedeagal shaft straight subapically, in lateral view | 21 |
19 | Apical tooth of style almost equal to subapical tooth (Fig. |
A. liubanus Yang & Zhang |
– | Apical tooth of style greatly shorter than subapical tooth | 20 |
20 | Aedeagal shaft processes relatively long, gonopore central (Fig. |
A. parisakazu Cao & Zhang |
– | Aedeagal shaft processes relatively short, gonopore subapical | A. akazu Matsumura |
21 | Apex of pre-atrial process serrated laterally (Fig. |
A. fusina Yang & Zhang |
– | Apex of pre-atrial process smooth | 22 |
22 | Pre-atrial process rudimentary, as long as 1/5 of aedeagal shaft (Fig. |
A. badjawae Dworakowska |
– | Pre-atrial process much longer than 1/5 of aedeagal shaft | 23 |
23 | Aedeagal shaft curved dorsad (Fig. |
A. falcata Yang & Zhang |
– | Aedeagal shaft straight | 24 |
24 | Apex of style slender (Fig. |
A. qinlingensis Yang & Zhang |
– | Apex of style foot-like | 25 |
25 | Aedeagal shaft with processes arising from subapex | 26 |
– | Aedeagal shaft with processes arising from apex | 27 |
26 | Apex of aedeagal shaft expanded (Fig. |
A. forcipiformis Yang & Zhang |
– | Apex of aedeagal shaft narrow (Fig. |
A. subapicifixa Yang & Zhang |
27 | Aedeagal shaft processes bent at right angle in ventral view | A. rolikae Dworakowska |
– | Aedeagal shaft processes straight or slightly curved in ventral view | 29 |
28 | Style without distinct apical and subapical teeth (Fig. |
A. sufflata Yang & Zhang |
– | Style with distinct apical and subapical teeth | 29 |
29 | Gonopore subapical (Fig. |
A. wolongensis Yang & Zhang |
– | Gonopore central | A. maculosa Dworakowska |
Aedeagus of Anufrievia spp, lateral view. A. A. adaucta Cao & Zhang, 2018; B. A. arcuata Yang & Zhang, 2018; C. Anufrievia badjawae Dworakowska, 1976; D. Anufrievia bauhinicola Dworakowska & Viraktamath, 1978; E. A. curva Yang & Zhang, 2018; F. A. expansa Cao & Zhang, 2018; G. A. falcata Yang & Zhang, 2018; H. A. forcipiformis Yang & Zhang, 2018; I. A. fusina Yang & Zhang, 2018; J. A. jinghongensis Cao & Zhang, 2018; K. A. liubanus Yang & Zhang, 2018; L. A. parisakazu Cao & Zhang, 2018; M. A. plana Yang & Zhang, 2018; N. A. qinlingensis Yang & Zhang, 2018; O. A. quadrata Cao & Zhang, 2018; P. A. sphenoides Yang & Zhang, 2018; Q. A. subapicifixa Yang & Zhang, 2018; R. A. subdentata Yang & Zhang, 2018; S. A. sufflata Yang & Zhang, 2018; T. A. symmetrica Cao & Zhang, 2018; U. A. triangulata Cao & Zhang, 2018; V. A. triprocessa Yang & Zhang, 2018; W. A. wolongensis Yang & Zhang, 2018; X. Anufrievia zelta Dworakowska, 1977.
This study was partly funded by the World Top Discipline Program of Guizhou Province: Karst Ecoenvironment Sciences (No.125 2019 Qianjiao Keyan Fa), the Guizhou Provincial Science and Technology Foundation ([2018]1411), the Guizhou Science and Technology Support Project ([2019]2855), the Science and Technology Project of Guiyang City ([2020]7-18), the Innovation Group Project of Education Department of Guizhou Province ([2021]013), the Training Program for High-level Innovative Talents of Guizhou Province ([2016]4020) and the Project for Regional Top Discipline Construction of Guizhou Province: Ecology in Guiyang University [Qian Jiao Keyan Fa [2017]85].