Biodiversity Data Journal : Taxonomic Paper
PDF
Taxonomic Paper
Two new species of Jalapriya and a new record, Dictyocheirospora vinaya from freshwater habitats in China
expand article infoXi Fu, Dan-Feng Bao§, Zong-Long Luo, Xiu He|, Hong-Yan Su
‡ College of Agriculture and Biological Sciences, Dali University, Dali, China
§ Center of Excellence in Fungal Research, Mae Fah Luang University, Chiang Rai, Thailand
| Faculty of Life Science and Technology, Kunming University of Science and Technology, Kunming, China
Open Access

Abstract

Background

Pleosporales is the largest order of Dothideomycetes. In recent years, systematics of Pleosporales have undergone considerable revisions. Dictyosporiaceae is one of the newly established families within this order proposed to accommodate holomorphic saprobic Dothideomycetes. Currently 18 genera are recognised in Dictyosporiaceae.

New information

The new species, Jalapriya aquaticum sp. nov. and J. apicalivaginatum sp. nov. were collected from freshwater habitats in Gansu and Yunnan Provinces, China, respectively and are introduced, based on morphology and molecular analysis of combined ITS, LSU, SSU and TEF1-α sequence data. We also recovered one fresh collection of Dictyocheirospora vinaya D’souza, Bhat & K.D. Hyde, which is a new record for China. Jalapriya aquaticum differs from extant species of Jalapriya in rows converging at the apex and apical cells with spherical-like appendages. Jalapriya apicalivaginatum differs from extant species of Jalapriya in having the rows of conidia mostly arranged in a plane. The phylogenetic analysis place the new collections within Dictyosporiaceae (Pleosporales). Descriptions and illustrations of Jalapriya aquaticum, J. apicalivaginatum and Dictyocheirospora vinaya are provided. A synopsis of characters of species of Jalapriya is also provided.

Keywords

asexual morphs, Dictyosporiaceae, freshwater fungi, phylogeny, taxonomy

Introduction

Pleosporales is the largest order of Dothideomycetes. In recent years, various families and genera in the Pleosporales have undergone considerable revisions (Goh and Hyde 1999, Cai et al. 2008, Tanaka et al. 2009, Zhang et al. 2009, Zhang et al. 2012, Hyde et al. 2013, Ariyawansa et al. 2015, Wang et al. 2016). Boonmee et al. (2016) accepted eleven genera in the family Dictyosporiaceae (Pleosporales) to accommodate most cheirosporous hyphomycetous genera that are saprobes on decaying wood and plant debris in terrestrial and freshwater habitats. One of the diagnostic characteristics of Dictyosporiaceae is their multicellular cheiroid conidia and this morphological feature distinguishes it from other families in the suborder Massarineae (Hyde et al. 2016). Liu et al. (2017) and Yang et al. (2018) updated the phylogenetic tree for Dictyosporiaceae and introduced two new genera Aquadictyospora and Dendryphiella in the family. Subsequently, three additional genera, Neodendryphiella, Pseudoconiothyrium and Paradictyocheirospora were added (Iturrieta-González et al. 2018, Crous et al. 2019, Rajeshkumar et al. 2021). Currently, 18 genera are accepted in Dictyosporiaceae (Boonmee et al. 2016, Li et al. 2017, Iturrieta-González et al. 2018, Yang et al. 2018, Crous et al. 2019, Hyde et al. 2020, Dong et al. 2020, Rajeshkumar et al. 2021).

The genus Jalapriya was introduced by Boonmee et al. (2016) with Jalapriya pulchra D'souza, Su, Luo & K.D. Hyde as type species; It is characterised by dark brown to black colonies, acrogenous, solitary and cheiroid conidia (Boonmee et al. 2016). Presently, three species are accepted in the genus, Jalapriya inflata, J. pulchra and J. toruloides.

Dictyocheirospora was established by Boonmee et al. (2016) to accommodate three new species, Dictyocheirospora bannica, D. rotunda and D. vinaya and four new combinations, D. gigantica, D. heptaspora, D. pseudomusae and D. subramanianii. Dictyocheirospora is characterised by non-complanate conidia with arms arising from the basal cell and closely gathered at the apex and compact (Wang et al. 2016). The species of Dictyocheirospora have been reported from freshwater and terrestrial habitats in China, Japan and Thailand (Jayasiri et al. 2015, Boonmee et al. 2016, Wang et al. 2016, Hyde et al. 2017, Li et al. 2017, Yang et al. 2018, Tibpromma et al. 2018, Phookamsak et al. 2019, Phukhamsakda et al. 2020). Currently, 23 species are accepted in the genus (Boonmee et al. 2016, Yang et al. 2018, Index Fungorum - Search Page).

In this study, two new species Jalapriya aquaticum and J. apicalivaginatum and a new geographic record, Dictyocheirospora vinaya are introduced, based on morphology and phylogenetic analyses. Detailed descriptions and illustrations are provided.

Materials and methods

Isolation and morphological examination

Submerged woody substrates were collected from dynamic waters, Gansu and Yunnan Provinces and taken back to the laboratory in Zip-lock plastic bags. The samples were incubated in plastic boxes lined with moistened tissue paper at room temperature for one week. Methods of morphological observation and isolation follow Luo et al. (2018) and Senanayake et al. (2020).

The pure cultures were developed by single spore isolation following the method provided by Chomnunti et al. (2014). The cultures are deposited in Kunming Institute of Botany, Chinese Academy of Sciences (KUMCC) and China General Microbiological Culture Collection Center (CGMCC). Herbarium specimens are deposited at the Herbarium of Cryptogams Kunming Institute of Botany Academia Sinica (Herb. HKAS). Facesoffungi and Index Fungorum numbers were obtained as in Jayasiri et al. (2015) and Index Fungorum - Search Page.

DNA extraction, PCR amplification and sequencing

Genomic DNA was extracted from fresh mycelia grown on PDA at room temperature. The EZ geneTM Fungal gDNA kit (GD2416) was used to extract DNA according to the manufacturer’s instructions. ITS, LSU, TEF1-α, SSU gene regions were amplified using the primer pairs ITS5/ITS4, LROR/LR5, EF1-983F/EF1-2218R and NS1/NS4. The final volume of the PCR reaction was 25 µl and contained 12.5 µl of 2 × Power Taq PCR MasterMix (a premix and ready-to-use solution, including 0.1 Units/µl Taq DNA Polymerase, 500 µM dNTP Mixture each (dATP, dCTP, dGTP, dTTP), 20 mM Tris– HCl pH 8.3, 100 mM KCl, 3 mM MgCl2, stabiliser and enhancer), 1 μl of each primer (10 μM), 1 µl genomic DNA extract and 9.5 µl deionised water. The PCR thermal cycle programme for ITS, LSU, TEF1α and SSU amplification was as follows: initial denaturation of 94°C for 3 minutes, followed by 35 cycles of denaturation at 94°C for 45 seconds, annealing at 56°C for 50 seconds, elongation at 72°C for 1 minute and the final extension at 72°C for 10 minutes. PCR products were purified using minicolumns, purification resin and buffer according to the manufacturer’s protocols (Amershamproduct code: 27–9602–01). The sequencing works were carried by Tsingke Biological Engineering Technology and Services Co. Ltd (Yunnan, P.R. China).

Phylogenetic analysis

Sequence data for relevant strains were downloaded from GenBank following recent publications (Boonmee et al. 2016, Li et al. 2017, Wang et al. 2016). The consensus sequences were initially aligned using MAFFT v.7 (http://mafft.cbrc.jp/alignment/server/) (Katoh and Standley 2013) and optimised manually when needed. The aligned dataset was analysed by Maximum Likelihood (ML) and Bayesian Inference (BI).

Maximum Likelihood analysis was performed using RAxMLGUI v.1.3 (Silvestro and Michalak 2011). The optimal ML tree search was conducted with 1,000 separate runs using the default algorithm of the programme from a random starting tree for each run. The final tree was selected amongst suboptimal trees from each run by comparing the likelihood scores using the GTR+GAMMA substitution model. Maximum Likelihood bootstrap values equal to or greater than 75% were given as the first set of numbers above the nodes in the resulting ML tree (Fig. 1).

Figure 1.  

RAxML tree generated from combined LSU, ITS, TEF1-α and SSU sequence data. Bootstrap support values for Maximum Likelihood (the first value) ≥ 75% and Bayesian posterior probabilities (the second value) ≥ 0.95 are placed near the branches as ML/BYPP. The tree is rooted to Periconia igniaria (CBS 379.86 and CBS 845.96). Newly-generated sequences are indicated in red and strains isolated from the holotype and reference specimens are indicated with a red superscript T.

Bayesian analysis was conducted with MrBayes v.3.1.2 (Ronquist and Huelsenbeck 2003) to evaluate posterior probabilities (Rannala and Yang 1996) by Markov Chain Monte Carlo sampling (MCMC). The best-fit models of evolution were estimated by MrModeltest V.2.2 (Nylander and Uppsala University 2004). ITS, LSU and TEF selected the GTR+I+G model with inverse gamma-distributed rate in Bayesian analyses. SSU selected the GTR+G model with inverse gamma-distributed rate in Bayesian analyses. The ML analyses were conducted with RAxML v.7.2.6 (Stamatakis and Alachiotis 2010) using a GTRGAMMA substitution model with 1000 bootstrap replicates. The robustness of the analyses was evaluated by bootstrap support (MLBS). Six simultaneous Markov chains were run for 10 million generations and trees were sampled every 100th generation and 100,000 trees were obtained. The first 20,000 trees, representing the burn-in phase of the analyses, were discarded, while the remaining 80,000 trees were used to calculate posterior probabilities in the majority rule consensus tree (the critical value for the topological convergence diagnostic was 0.01). Through the posterior probabilities (PP) to reflect visually the reliability of each branch without the test for bootstrap method.

The phylogenetic trees were viewed and optimised in FigTree v.1.2.2 (Rambaut and Drummond 2008) and edited further using Microsoft Office PowerPoint. Newly-generated sequences in this study were deposited in GenBank (Table 1).

Table 1.

Isolates and sequences used in this study (newly-generated sequences are indicated in bold, strains isolated from the holotype and reference specimens are indicated in with a T, without GenBank accession numbers are indicated in "_") .

Taxon

Voucher/culture

GenBank accession numbers

ITS

LSU

TEF1α

SSU

Aquaticheirospora lignicola

HKUCC 10304T

AY864770

AY736378

_

AY736377

Aquadictyospora clematidis

MFLUCC 17-2080T

NR171871

_

MT394727

NG070646

A. lignicola

MFLUCC 17-1318T

MF948621

MF948629

MF953164

_

Cheirosporium triseriale

MB 506570

EU413953

EU413954

_

_

Dendryphiella eucalyptorum

CBS 137987T

KJ869139

KJ869196

_

_

Den. fasciculata

MFLUCC 17-1074T

MF399213

MF399214

_

_

Den. paravinosa

CBS 141286T

KX228257

KX228309

_

_

Dictyocheirospora aquadulcis

MFLU 18-1088T

MK634545

MK634542

_

_

Di. aquatica

KUMCC 15-0305T

KY320508

KY320513

_

_

Di. aquatica

HKAS 92714T

NR154030

_

_

_

Di. bannica

HHUF 30126T

NR154039

NG059061

AB808489

NG064841

Di. bannica

MFLU 18-1040

MH381765

MH381774

_

MH381759

Di. cheirospora

KUMCC 17-0035T

MF177035

MF177036

_

MF928073

Di. clematidis

MFLUCC 17-2089T

MT310593

MT214546

MT394728

MT226665

Di. garethjonesii

MFLUCC 16-0909T

KY320509

KY320514

_

_

Di. garethjonesii

DUCC 0848T

MF948623

MF948631

MF953166

_

Di. gigantica

BCC 11346

DQ018095

_

_

_

Di. heptaspora

DLU 1992

MT756244

MT756243

_

_

Di. indica

MFLUCC 15-0056T

MH381763

MH381772

MH388817

MH381757

Di. lithocarpi

MFLUCC 17-2537T

NR163345

NG070074

_

NG065783

Di. metroxylonis

MFLUCC 15-0028bT

MH742322

MH742314

MH764303

MH742318

Di. nabanheensis

MFLUCC 17-2291

MK347748

MK347965

MK360050

_

Di. nabanheensis

MFLUCC 17-2296

MK347756

MK347973

MK360051

_

Di. pandanicola

MFLUCC 16-0365T

MH388341

MH376713

MH388376

_

Di. pseudomusae

Yone 234T

LC014550

AB807520

AB808496

AB797230

Di. rotunda

MFLUCC 17-0222

MH381764

MH381773

MH388818

MH381758

Di. rotunda

MFLUCC 140293aT

KU179099

KU179100

_

_

Di. rotunda

MFLUCC 17-1313

MF948625

MF948633

MF953168

_

Di. subramanianii

BCC 3503

DQ018094

AB807520

_

_

Di. taiwanense

MFLUCC 17-2654T

MK495821

MK495820

_

_

Di. thailandica

MFLUCC 18-0987T

NR171885

MN913743

_

_

Di. vinaya

MFLUCC140294dT

KU179102

KU179103

_

KU179104

Di. vinaya

HKAS 115802

MZ618659

MZ618660

MZ851994

_

Di. xishuangbannaensis

MFLUCC 17-2267T

MH388342

MH376714

MH388377

_

Dictyosporium appendiculatum

MFLUCC 17-2259

MH388343

MH376715

_

_

Dictyos. aquaticum

MF1318T

KM610236

_

_

_

Dictyos. digitatum

MFLUCC 17-0635

MH388344

MH376716

MH388378

_

Dictyos. guttulatum

MFLUCC 16-0258

MH388345

MH376717

MH388379

MH388312

Dictyos. hongkongensis

MFLUCC 17-0633

MH388346

MH376718

MH388380

NG068388

Dictyos. meiosporum

MFLUCC 10-0131T

KP710944

KP710945

_

_

Dictyos. nigroapice

MFLUCC 17-2053

MH381768

MH381777

MH388821

_

Dictyos. krabiense

MFLU 16-1890

_

MH376719

MH388381

_

Dictyos. palmae

CBS H-22129

_

KX555648

_

_

Dictyos. pandanicola

MFLU 16-1886

MH388347

MH376720

MH388382

_

Dictyos. stellatum

CCFC 241241T

NR154608

JF951177

_

_

Dictyos. strelitziae

CBS 123359T

NR156216

FJ839653

_

_

Dictyos. tetrasporum

KT 2865

LC014551

AB807519

AB808495

_

Dictyos. tubulatum

MFLUCC 15-0631T

MH381769

MH381778

MH388822

_

Dictyos. wuyiense

CGMCC 3-18703T

KY072977

_

_

_

Dictyos. zhejiangense

MW-2009aT

FJ456893

_

_

_

Dictyos. bambusicola

CBS 110279T

DQ018091

DQ018103

_

_

Dictyos. chiangmaiense

HKAS 102163

_

MK571766

_

MK571775

Gregarithecium curvisporum

KT 922T

AB809644

AB807547

_

AB797257

Gregarithecium sp.

MFLUCC 13-0853

KX364281

KX364282

_

KX364283

Jalapriya apicalivaginatum

HKAS 115801T

MZ621167

MZ621168

_

_

J. aquaticum (2101)

HKAS 115807T

MZ621152

MZ621169

MZ851995

MZ621170

J. aquaticum (2351)

DLUCC 2351

MZ621151

MZ621165

_

MZ621166

J. inflata

NTOU 3855

JQ267362

JQ267363

_

JQ267361

J. pulchra

MFLUCC 15-0348T

KU179108

KU179109

_

KU179110

J. pulchra

MFLUCC 17-1683

MF948628

MF948636

MF953171

_

Jalapriya sp.

19VA07

JX270548

_

_

_

J. toruloides

CBS 209.65

DQ018093

DQ018104

_

DQ018081

Neodendryphiella mali

CBS 139.95T

LT906655

LT906657

_

_

N. michoacanensis

FMR 16098T

LT906660

LT906658

_

_

N. tarraconensis

FMR 16234T

LT906659

LT906656

_

_

Periconia igniaria

CBS 379.86

LC014585

AB807566

AB808542

AB797276

P. igniaria

CBS 845.96

LC014586

AB807567

AB808543

GU296171

Pseudocoleophoma bauhiniae

MFLUCC 17-2280

MK347735

MK347952

MK360075

MK347843

Pseudoc. bauhiniae

MFLUCC 17-2586

MK347736

MK347953

MK360076

MK347844

Pseudoc. calamagrostidis

KT 3284T

LC014592

LC014609

LC014614

LC014604

Pseudoc. polygonicola

KT 731T

AB809634

AB807546

AB808522

AB797256

Pseudoc. typhicola

MFLUCC 16-0123T

KX576655

KX576656

_

_

Pseudoconiothyrium broussonetiae

CBS 145036

MK442618

MK442554

MK442709

_

Pseudodictyosporium elegams

CBS 688.93T

MH862454

MH874101

_

DQ018084

Pseudodi. indicum

CBS 471.95

DQ018097

_

_

_

Pseudodi. thailandica

MFLUCC 16-0029T

KX259520

KX259522

KX259526

KX259524

Pseudodi. wauense

NBRC 30078

DQ018098

DQ018105

_

DQ018083

Pseudodi. wauense

DUCC 0801

MF948622

MF948630

MF953165

_

Vikalpa australiensis

HKUCC 8797T

DQ018092

_

_

_

Taxon treatments

Jalapriya apicalivaginatum D.F. Bao, X. Fu, H.Y. Su & Z.L. Luo, 2021, sp. nov.

Material   Download as CSV 
Holotype:
  1. scientificName:
    Jalapriya apicalivaginatum
    ; phylum:
    Ascomycota
    ; class:
    Dothideomycetes
    ; order:
    Pleosporales
    ; family:
    Dictyosporiaceae
    ; genus:
    Jalapriya
    ; locationRemarks:
    China, Gansu Province, Gannan City, Xiahe County, Sangke Town, on decaying wood submerged in stream, July 2020
    ; habitat:
    decaying wood submerged in stream
    ; collectionID:
    SK 1-21-1 H
    ; collectionCode:
    L-78

Description

Saprobic on decaying wood submerged in stream. Asexual morph: Hyphomycetous (Fig. 2). Colonies effuse, scattered, dark brown or black. Mycelium mostly immersed, partly superficial, composed of smooth, septate, branched, hyaline to pale brown hyphae. Conidiophores micronematous, reduced, hyaline to pale brown, unbranched, thin-walled, smooth. Conidiogenous cells holoblastic, integrated, terminal. Conidia acrogenous, solitary, cheiroid, pale brown, the shape of conidia like a "U", with 3–5 rows of cells. The rows in the middle are little bit longer than the outer rows and each row of cells with an apical hyaline, inflated, gelatinous subglobose, cap-like appendage, the rows of conidia mostly arranged in a plane and 2 outer rows arising from a basal cell, rows not separating, each row consisting of 6–12 cells, the size of outer rows 15–52 × 3–6 μm (x̄ = 36 × 5 μm, n = 30), excluding apical hyaline gelatinous appendages, the size of inner rows 24–47 × 4–7 μm (x̄ = 40 × 5.5 μm, n = 30). The size of conidia 24–47 × 17–31.5 µm (x̄ = 40 × 23 μm, n = 30). Sexual morph: Undetermined.

Figure 2.  

Jalapriya apicalivaginatum (HKAS 115801, holotype). a Colonies on submerged wood; b-l Conidia; m Germinating conidium; n-o Culture on PDA from above and reverse. Scale bars: b, f-g, 20 μm; c, 30 μm; d-e, h-m, 15 μm.

Culture characteristics: 

Conidia germinating on PDA within 24 h, germ tubes arising from the outermost cells of the conidium. Colonies on MEA covering 9 cm diam., in 4 weeks at 28°C. On the obverse, the edges are white and the middle is greyish-white. On the reverse, colonies appear pale yellow. Sporulation not observed in culture.

Material examined: 

CHINA, Gansu Province, Gannan City, Xiahe County, Sangke Town, 35°8'9"N, 102°27'11"E, on decaying wood submerged in stream, July 2020, Z.L. Luo, SK 1–21–1 H (HKAS 115801, holotype), ex-type living culture, KUNCC 21-10704 = CGMCC 3.20612.

Etymology

Referring to the conidia with an apical mucilaginous sheath.

Notes

In the phylogenetic analysis, J. apicalivaginatum formed a distinct lineage within Jalapriya and close to Jalapriya sp. (19VA07); However, the morphology of Jalapriya sp. (19VA07) was not available, but phylogeny of J. apicalivaginatum and Jalapriya sp. are distinct. Jalapriya apicalivaginatum resembles J. pulchra and J. inflata in having each conidial row of cells with an apical hyaline, inflated, gelatinous subglobose, cap-like appendage. However, Jalapriya inflata is characterised by branched conidiophores, whereas conidiophores of J. apicalivaginatum are not differentiated. Jalapriya apicalivaginatum has fewer number of rows than those of J. pulchra (3–5 rows vs. 5–7 rows) and conidia are smaller than those of J. pulchra (24–47 × 17–31.5 µm vs. 32–46 × 23.5–31.5 μm) (Boonmee et al. 2016) (Table 2).

Table 2.

A synopsis of characters of species of Jalapriya.

Species

Conidia

Distribution

Reference

Shape

Size (μm)

Colour

Number of rows

Jalapriya inflata

Euseptate, thin-walled and staurosporous, composed of an apically inflated basal cell

28.5–38 × 14.5–21.5

Brown

3–4 rows

UK, Ontario, On rotten wood

Matsushima 1983, Kirschner et al. 2013, Boonmee et al. 2016, Iturrieta-González et al. 2018

J. pulchra

Acrogenous, solitary, each row of cells with an apical hyaline, inflated, gelatinous subglobose, cap-like appendage

32–46 × 23.5–31.5

Uniformly pale to medium reddish-brown

5–7 rows

CHINA, Yunnan Province, on decaying wood submerged in stream

Boonmee et al. 2016, Iturrieta-González et al. 2018

J. aquaticum

Acrogenous, solitary, rows converging at apex, apical cells with spherical-like appendages

22–53 × 16–24

Pale to medium brown

3–4 rows

CHINA, Yunnan Province, on decaying wood submerged in stream

This study

J. apicalivaginatum

Acrogenous, solitary, thin-walled, each row of cells with an apical hyaline, inflated, gelatinous subglobose, cap-like appendage

24–47 × 17–31.5

pale brown

3–5 rows

CHINA, Gansu Province, on decaying wood submerged in stream

This study

Jalapriya aquaticum D.F. Bao, X. Fu, H.Y. Su & Z.L. Luo, 2021, sp. nov.

Material   Download as CSV 
Holotype:
  1. scientificName:
    Jalapriya aquaticum
    ; phylum:
    Ascomycota
    ; class:
    Dothideomycetes
    ; order:
    Pleosporales
    ; family:
    Dictyosporiaceae
    ; genus:
    Jalapriya
    ; locationRemarks:
    China, Yunnan Province, Dali, Cangshan Mountain, Lingquan stream, on decaying wood submerged in stream, April 2019
    ; habitat:
    Saprobic on decaying wood submerged in stream
    ; collectionID:
    1LQX III H Z-7-1
    ; collectionCode:
    S-2101

Description

Saprobic on decaying wood submerged in stream. Asexual morph: Hyphomycetous (Fig. 3). Colonies punctiform, sporodochial, velvety, dark brown to black. Conidiophores micronematous, subhyaline to pale brown hyphae, unbranched, thin-walled, smooth. Mycelium immersed, composed of brown, smooth, thin-walled, septate. Conidiogenous cells holoblastic, integrated, terminal. Conidia acrogenous, solitary, cheiroid, pale to medium brown, with 3–4 rows of cells, rows converging at apex, apical cells with spherical-like appendages, the immature conidia are slightly curved and become straight after maturity. Two outer rows arising from a basal cell, rows not separating, each row consisting of 6–12 cells, the size of outer rows 29–53 × 6–8 μm (x̄ =45 × 5 μm, n = 30), excluding apical hyaline gelatinous appendages, the size of inner rows 22–44 × 4–8 μm (x̄ = 38 ×6 μm, n = 30). The size of conidia 22–53 × 16–24 µm. Sexual morph: Undetermined.

Figure 3.  

Jalapriya aquaticum (HKAS 115807, holotype). a Colonies on submerged wood; b Squash mount of conidioma; c-i Conidia; j Germinating conidium; k-l Culture on PDA from above and reverse. Scale bars: b, 40 μm; c-j, 20 μm.

Culture characteristics: 

Conidia germinating on PDA within 24 h, germ tubes arising from the outermost cells of the conidium. Colonies on MEA covering 9 cm diam., in 4 weeks, at 28°C, white to cream. Sporulation not observed in culture.

Material examined: 

CHINA, Yunnan Province, Dali, Cangshan Mountain, Lingquan stream, 25.747501°N, 100.090989°E, on decaying wood submerged in stream, April 2019, Z.Q. Zhang, 1LQX III H Z-7-1 (S-2101) (HKAS 115807, holotype), ex-type living culture, KUNCC 21-10705 = DLUCC 2101 = CGMCC 3.20613; ibid. July 2019, Zhengquan Zhang, 2LQX III Z-56-1 H (S-2351), living culture, KUNCC 21-10706 = DLUCC 2101.

Etymology

Referring to the species collected from aquatic habitats.

Notes

In the phylogenetic analysis, J. aquaticum nested in Jalapriya and sister to J. toruloides. Morphologically, J. aquaticum is similar to J. inflata in having 3–4 rows of conidia, but differs from J. inflat in the shape of the conidia, the cells of J. inflata are fuller and more three-dimensional. J. inflata arranged more loosely in the rows of conidia and J. aquaticum packed more tightly. J. aquaticum has larger conidia than those of J. inflata (22–53 × 16–24 vs. 28.5–38 × 14.5–21.5 μm). Jalapriya quaticum similar to J. pulchra in having appendages on the apical cells of the conidia, but differs in the rows of J. aquaticum not being separable without manual force.

Dictyocheirospora vinaya D’souza, Bhat & K.D. Hyde, 2016, Fungal Diversity 80: 465

Material   Download as CSV 
Holotype:
  1. scientificName:
    Dictyocheirospora vinaya
    ; phylum:
    Ascomycota
    ; class:
    Dothideomycetes
    ; order:
    Pleosporales
    ; family:
    Dictyosporiaceae
    ; genus:
    Dictyocheirospora
    ; locationRemarks:
    Thailand. Chiang Mai, Mushroom Research Centre, on submerged wood in a freshwater stream, 24 November 2013
    ; habitat:
    submerged wood in a freshwater stream
    ; identifiedBy:
    D’souza, Bhat & K.D. Hyde
    ; type:
    MFLU 14–0264
    ; collectionCode:
    MJD-26
    ; source:

Description

Saprobic on decaying wood in streams. Asexual morph: Hyphomycetous (Fig. 4). Colonies punctiform, sporodochial, velvety, dark brown. Mycelium immersed, composed of pale brown, smooth, thin-walled septate, branched, 1–2 μm wide hyphae. Conidiophores 9–27 × 3–6 μm (x̄ = 15 × 5 μm, n = 18), micronematous to semi-macronematous, pale brown, smooth, thin-walled. Conidiogenous cells holoblastic, integrated, terminal, determinate, pale brown. Conidia solitary, terminal, cheiroid, 48–110 × 14–32 μm (x̄ = 73 × 22 μm, n = 30), pale brown, consisting of 7 rows of cells; rows digitate, arising from a basal cell, each arm consisting of 10–20 cells, distoseptate, constricted at septa, rows appressed when young, inwardly curved at the tip, palmately divergent when squashed, smooth-walled, guttulate. Sexual morph: Undetermined.

Figure 4.  

Dictyocheirospora vinaya (HKAS 115802). a Colonies on submerged wood; b Squash mount of conidioma; c-k Conidia; l Germinating conidium; m-n Culture on PDA from above and reverse. Scale bars: b, 50 μm; c-d, h-k, 40 μm; e-g, l, 30 μm.

Culture characteristics: 

Conidia germinating on water agar within 24 h, germ tubes emerging from the basal cells of the conidium. Colonies on PDA covering 9 cm diam., in 4 weeks, at 28°C, with wavy margins, at first white, later becoming orange. Sporulating regions scattered, but mostly confined to the centre of the culture.

Material examined: 

CHINA, Yunnan Province, Nanpanjiang River, 24°33'57.48"N, 103°06'44.44"E, on decaying wood submerged in stream, 23 February 2018, X. He, NPJ H 3–2–1 (HKAS 115802); living culture KUNCC 21-10707.

Notes

Dictyocheirospora vinaya, the type species of Dictyocheirospora, was introduced by Boonmee et al. (2016). Dictyocheirospora vinaya is characterised by punctiform, dark brown colonies, pale brown, solitary, terminal, cheiroid conidia. Our fresh collection fits perfectly with the original description of D. vinaya (Boonmee et al. 2016). Phylogenetic analyses showed that our strain (DLUCC 1674) clustered with the ex-type strain of D. vinaya with high bootstrap support (93% ML and 1.00 PP). ITS comparison between our strain and MFLUCC 14–0294 revealed that there is no difference in a total of 499 bp, comparison of LSU between our strain and MFLUCC 14–0294 revealed 3 bp differences in a total of 1252 bp. Thus, we identified our new collection as D. vinaya, based on both phylogeny and morphology. Dictyocheirospora vinaya MFLUCC 14–0294 collected from freshwater habitats in Thailand, while our new collection was collected from freshwater habitats in China. It is a new record for China.

Identification keys

Key to Jalapriya species

1 Conidia without appendages J. toruloides
Conidia with appendages 3
2 Conidia composed of 5–7 rows J. pulchra
Conidia composed of 3–5 rows 3
3 Conidia 28.5–38 × 14.5–21.5 μm J. inflata
The size of conidia not as above 4
4 Apical cell of conidia with spherical-like appendages J. aquaticum
Apical cell of conidia with cap-like appendages J. apicalivaginatum

Analysis

Phylogenetic analysis

The combined ITS, LSU, TEF1-α and SSU dataset consisted 78 sequences representing all genera of the Dictyosporiaceae with Periconia igniaria (CBS 379.86 and CBS 845.96) as outgroup taxon. The best scoring RaxML tree with the final ML optimisation likelihood value of –20943.450686 is shown here (Fig. 1). The alignment comprised 4309 characters including gaps. The matrix had 1309 distinct alignment patterns, with 51.74% undetermined characters or gaps. Estimated base frequencies were as follows: A = 0.241918, C = 0.244332, G = 0.269566, T = 0.244184; substitution rates AC = 1.667496, AG = 3.298982, AT = 2.345910, CG = 0.903092, CT = 8.345950, GT = 1.000000; Tree-Length = 1.761576.

Two newly-collected Jalapriya aquaticum isolates grouped with species of Jalapriya and basal to the genus with highly-supported value (100 ML/1.00 PP). Jalapriya apicalivaginatum formed a distinct lineage between J. toruloides and Jalapriya sp. (19VA07) with high bootstrap (97 ML/1.00 PP). Dictyocheirospora vinaya (HKAS 115802) clustered with its ex-type strains with high support (93 ML/1.00 PP).

Discussion

Dictyosporiaceae accommodates a holomorphic group of Dothideomycetes, including 18 genera (Hyde et al. 2019, Rajeshkumar et al. 2021). Dictyocheirospora is the second largest genus of Dictyosporiaceae, followed by Dictyosporium. Dictyocheirospora is morphologically similar to Dictyosporium in having cheiroid, cylindrical conidia; However, Dictyocheirospora differs from Dictyosporium in having non-complanate conidia with arms arising from the basal cell and closely gathered at the apex and compact, while Dictyosporium has complanate conidia without separating arms. Thus, eight species were transferred from Dictyosporium to Dictyocheirospora, based on themorphological characters and phylogenetic analyses. (Boonmee et al. 2016, Yang et al. 2018). Dictyocheirospora is cosmopolitan in distribution and commonly reported from freshwater habitats in China, India, Japan and Thailand. Nine species of Dictyocheirospora were found on submerged decaying wood, others were found in terrestrial habitats. Currently, nine species have been discovered in China including Dictyocheirospora vinaya, which is mentioned in this article. (Boonmee et al. 2016, Wang et al. 2016, Hyde et al. 2017, Li et al. 2017, Yang et al. 2018, Tibpromma et al. 2018, Jayasiri et al. 2015, Phookamsak et al. 2019, Phukhamsakda et al. 2020, Rajeshkumar et al. 2021).

Currently, three species are accepted in Jalapriya, of which, J. toruloides (Corda) is a terrestrial species discovered by Henningsson (1974) in Sweden; Afterwards it has been found in subtropical to temperate areas of both hemispheres, seemingly more often reported from coastal localities, considered an euryhaline species (Tibell et al. 2020), but our fresh collections are all from submerged wood in freshwater lotic habitats. In addition, both J. pulchra and J. acuaticum were all found in Yunnan Province, China on decaying wood submerged in a stream (Table 2). The morphological differences between J. apicalivaginatum and J. pulchra are not significant, but they are phylogenetically distinct. Morphology of J. toruloides is not available; However, the new species J. aquaticum forms a distinct clade from J. toruloides. Jalapriya aquaticum is different from other species in Jalapriya and forms a separate branch with high support value (100% ML and 1.00 BYPP).

Acknowledgements

This research was financed and supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Project ID: 31860006, 31970021) and Fungal diversity conservation and utilisation innovation team of Dali University (ZKLX2019213). We thank Zheng-quan Zhang, Jian-wei Li, Lv He and Xiang Hong for the help on collecting samples. Xi Fu thanks Yi-Le Wan, You Mu and Yan Tao for their help on isolation and morphological examination, DNA extraction and PCR amplification. We are grateful to Hong-Wei Shen for his valuable suggestions and help.

References

login to comment