Biodiversity Data Journal :
Taxonomic Paper
|
Corresponding author:
Academic editor: Anu Veijalainen
Received: 27 Jan 2016 | Accepted: 26 Apr 2016 | Published: 04 May 2016
© 2016 Ying Zhang, Zi-Cheng Xiong, Kees van Achterberg, Tao Li
This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Citation:
Zhang Y, Xiong Z, van Achterberg K, Li T (2016) A key to the East Palaearctic and Oriental species of the genus Rhysipolis Foerster, and the first host records of Rhysipolis longicaudatus Belokobylskij (Hymenoptera: Braconidae: Rhysipolinae). Biodiversity Data Journal 4: e7944. https://doi.org/10.3897/BDJ.4.e7944
|
A key to the East Palaearctic and northern Oriental species of Rhysipolis Foerster, 1862 (Hymenoptera: Braconidae: Rhysipolinae) is presented. Rhysipolis longicaudatus Belokobylskij, 1994 (stat. nov.) is redescribed, the first host records are given and it is reported new for China.
Rhysipolis longicaudatus was reared from Taleporia sp. (Lepidoptera: Psychidae) in Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region and from Bazaria turensis Ragonot (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae) in Qinghai Province.
Rhysipolinae, Psychidae, Pyralidae, Rhysipolis longicaudatus, new hosts, parasitoid
The genus Rhysipolis Foerster, 1862 (Hymenoptera: Braconidae: Rhysipolinae) includes 22 described species (
The recorded hosts of Rhysipolis species mainly belong to the lepidopteran families Gelechiidae and Gracillariidae, but also Choreutidae, Cosmopterigidae, Elachistidae, Hesperiidae, Lyonetiidae, Momphidae, Pyralidae, Tineidae, Tischeriidae and Tortricidae have been reported (
Mature larvae of a bagworm moth, Taleporia sp. (Lepidoptera: Psychidae) were collected in Etuoke (Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region), and larvae of Bazaria turensis Ragonot (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae) in Dulan County, Qinghai Province, NW China. The larvae were brought to the laboratory and maintained in a large nylon cage at room temperature. All larvae were checked daily for pupation and parasitoid emergence. Emerged parasitoid larvae and pupae were kept individually in glass tubes (100 mm long and 15 mm in diameter) with a piece of filter paper dipped in distilled water in order to prevent desiccation and plugged with absorbent cotton. The hosts were identified by Prof. Hou-Hun Li (Nankai University, Tianjin).
For the morphological terminology used in this paper see
The specimens and hosts are deposited in the Insect Museum, General Station of Forest Pest Management (GSFPM), State Forestry Administration, Shenyang, P. R. China, and Naturalis Biodiversity Center (RMNH), Leiden, the Netherlands.
Female. Length of body 2.7–4.0 mm, and of fore wing 2.9–4.0 mm (Figs
Head (Fig.
Mesosoma (Figs
Wings (Fig.
Legs (Figs
Metasoma (Fig.
Colour. Dark brown to blackish brown (Fig.
Male. Length of body 2.5–3.1 mm, and of fore wing 2.2–3.2 mm. Antennal segments 28–33, length 2.6–4.0 mm. Length of mesosoma 2.0–2.6 × its height. Length of first tergite 1.0–1.2 × as long as its apical width and apical width 1.9–2.0 × as long as its basal width. Head, metasoma and antenna, dark brown; palpi, mesosoma (propodeum brown), legs (telotarsus and claw brown), tegula, pterostigma and veins, yellowish brown. Alternatively, face (median with little reddish brown), mandible (apical black brown), palpi, pronotum, legs (tarsus and claw, brown), tegulae, pterostigma, vein, yellowish brown; antenna (ventral of scope yellowish brown), dark brown; vertex, frons (lateral margin dark reddish brown), temple, scutellar sulcus, precoxal sulcus, dark reddish brown to dark brown; metanotum, propodeum and first tergite, blackish brown or first tergite dark yellowish brown and remaining tergites dark brown.
Setose part of ovipositor sheath about 0.7 × as long as hind tibia (its total length about 1.3 × tibia); clypeus and mesoscutum medially yellowish, with face and mesoscutum laterally dark brown; propodeum with closed, parallel-sided and laterally lamelliform areola, sculptured medio-posteriorly, without semicircular smooth and shiny convex area; notauli present posteriorly (Fig.
NW China: Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region; Qinghai (new record for China); Far East Russia.
Reared from the larvae of Taleporia sp. (Lepidoptera: Psychidae) on Caragana korshinskii Kom. (Leguminosae) and from Bazaria turensis Ragonot (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae) on Nitraria sp. (Zygophyllaceae). First host records.
Key to East Palaearctic and Oriental species of the genus Rhysipolis Foerster |
||
1 | Vein 3-SR of fore wing 1.6–1.8 × longer than vein r-m and 1.2–1.3 × as long as vein 2-SR; hypoclypeal depression wide elliptical and about 0.8 × minimum width of face; hind femur 3.3–3.6 × as long as wide | R. mongolicus Belokobylskij, 1985 |
– | Vein 3-SR of fore wing 2.3–3.0 × longer than vein r-m and 1.4–1.7× as long as vein 2-SR; hypoclypeal depression semicircular and 0.4–0.7 × minimum width of face; hind femur 4.3–5.5 × as long as wide | 2 |
2 | Clypeus close to eyes, distance between anterior tentorial pit and eye about equal to width of tentorial pit; head distinctly transverse in dorsal view; hypoclypeal depression 0.7 × as wide as face; malar space 0.2–0.3 × basal width of mandible; eye in dorsal view about 4.0 × as long as temple; OOL 0.5–0.8 × diameter of posterior ocellus | R. oculator Belokobylskij, 1986 |
– | Clypeus distinctly removed from eyes, distance between anterior tentorial pit and eye at least 3.0 × width of tentorial pit; head trapezoid in dorsal view; hypoclypeal depression 0.4–0.6 × as wide as face; malar space 0.4–0.7 × basal width of mandible; eye in dorsal view 1.6–3.8 × as long as temple; if more than 3.0 × then OOL about twice diameter of posterior ocellus | 3 |
3 | Pronotum with pair of slightly converging carinae submedially; dorsal part of propodeum of male densely granulate; [ovipositor sheath slightly longer than first tergite; notauli crenulate anteriorly] | R. bicarinator Belokobylskij, 1986 |
– | Pronotum without pair of submedial carinae or nearly so, but distinctly converging carinae may be present sublaterally; propodeum at least partly smooth | 4 |
4 | Propodeum with distinct semicircular smooth and strongly shiny convex area medio-posteriorly; pronotum comparatively large and wide anteriorly; notauli absent posteriorly, only anteriorly narrowly impressed; mesoscutum smooth medio-posteriorly or sculptured; vein M+CU of hind wing 0.6–0.8 × vein 1-M; R. decorator-group | 5 |
– | Propodeum sculptured medio-posteriorly, without semicircular smooth and shiny convex area (Fig. |
8 |
5 | Dorsal margin of clypeus near lower level of eyes; eye in dorsal view about twice as long as temple and no long setae near occipital carina; [notauli crenulate anteriorly; pronope obsolescent] | R. enukidzei Tobias, 1976 Syn.: R. alacer Papp, 1987 |
– | Dorsal margin of clypeus distinctly above lower level of eyes; eye in dorsal view 1.8–3.8 × as long as temple, if 1.8–2.4 × then with long setae near occipital carina; [pronotum with distinct anterior lamelliform rim] | 6 |
6 | Occipital carina with fringe of long curved setae (Fig. |
R. hariolator (Haliday, 1836) Syn.: R. barbatus (Wesmael, 1838) |
– | Occipital carina without fringe of long setae; length of eye in dorsal view 3.5–3.8 × temple; propleuron yellowish anteriorly, hardly or not contrasting with most of pronotum (Fig. |
7 |
7 | Notauli smooth anteriorly or nearly so; face brownish-yellow and smooth laterally; medio-dorsally pronotum dark brown or infuscate and weakly contrasting with dark brown or black mesoscutum; [mesoscutum smooth medio-posteriorly; eyes oval (Fig. |
R. decorator (Haliday, 1836) Syn.: R. ruficeps (Wesmael, 1838); R. ruficornis (Szépligeti, 1896); R. caudatus (Thomson, 1892) |
– | Notauli crenulate anteriorly; face black or mainly dark brown and usually laterally micro-sculptured; medio-dorsally pronotum striking yellow and strongly contrasting with black mesoscutum; [temples directly narrowed in dorsal view; shallow pronope present] | R. temporalis Belokobylskij, 1986 Syn.: R. geranus Papp, 1987 |
8 | Setose part of ovipositor sheath 0.2–0.3 × as long as hind tibia (total length 0.4–0.5 × tibia) and 1.0–1.3 × as long as first tergite; [clypeus, face and mesoscutum entirely brownish yellow or dark brown] | 9 |
– | Setose part of ovipositor sheath 0.6–0.7 × as long as hind tibia (total length up to 1.3 × tibia) and 2.0–3.0 × as long as first tergite | 12 |
9 | Stemmaticum minute, width of frons about 3.5 × width of stemmaticum; middle lobe of mesoscutum glabrous; [head strongly narrowed behind eyes and subglobular] | R. taiwanicus Belokobylskij, 1988 |
– | Stemmaticum medium-sized, width of frons about 2.5 × width of stemmaticum; middle lobe of mesoscutum setose; head roundly narrowed behind eyes | 10 |
10 | Vein r of fore wing strongly oblique, distal angle with pterostigma about 60º; marginal cell of fore wing about 4.0 × as long as its maximum width; Oriental | R. parnarae Belokobylskij & Vu, 1988 |
– | Vein r of fore wing moderately oblique, distal angle with pterostigma nearly 90º (Fig. |
11 |
11 | Clypeus, face, pronotum anteriorly and mesoscutum brownish yellow; lateral carinae of propodeal areola parallel-sided and areola closed anteriorly; notauli moderately wide and distinctly crenulate; first tergite largely smooth; pterostigma yellow | R. setmus Papp, 1987 |
– | Clypeus, face, pronotum anteriorly and mesoscutum black or blackish; lateral carinae of propodeal areola diverging anteriorly and areola open anteriorly; notauli narrow and finely crenulate anteriorly; first tergite largely sculptured; pterostigma largely rather dark brown; [middle lobe of mesoscutum with shallow median groove, glabrous and strongly shiny; malar space 0.2 × as long as height of eye] | R. meditator (Haliday, 1836) Syn.: R. decorator auctt. p.p.; R. intermedius (Wesmael, 1838); R. meditator f. brevicaudatus Belokobylskij, 1994 |
12 | Mesoscutum finely granulate; medially ventral rim of clypeus far below lower level of eyes | R. townesi Belokobylskij, 1988 |
– | Mesoscutum (except some rugosity medio-posteriorly) smooth (Fig. |
R. longicaudatus Belokobylskij, 1994, stat. nov. |
The authors are deeply grateful to Drs. Anu Veijalainen (subject editor), Michael Sharkey (Department of Entomology, University of Kentucky, USA), Julia Stigenberg (Swedish Museum of Natural History, Stockholm, Sweden) and one anonymous referee for valuable comments and suggestions. We are also indebted to Prof. Hou-Hun Li (Nankai University, Tianjin, China) for identifying the hosts. This research was supported by the “Twelfth Five-year” National Science and Technology Support Program of China (Grant No. 2012BAD19B0701) and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC, No. 31070585, No. 31310103033).