Biodiversity Data Journal :
Data Paper (Biosciences)
|
Corresponding author: Evgeniy Simonov (ev.simonov@gmail.com)
Academic editor: Truong Nguyen
Received: 18 Feb 2022 | Accepted: 29 Mar 2022 | Published: 14 Apr 2022
© 2022 Evgeniy Simonov, Valentina Kuranova, Artem Lisachov, Vadim Yartsev, Irina Bogomolova
This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Citation:
Simonov E, Kuranova VN, Lisachov A, Yartsev VV, Bogomolova IN (2022) Database of Amphibia distribution in West Siberia (Russia). Biodiversity Data Journal 10: e82436. https://doi.org/10.3897/BDJ.10.e82436
|
|
West Siberia is a large region in North Eurasia, which harbours multiple climatic zones, landscape types and biomes. Its amphibian fauna is characterised by a combination of European and Asian species. For many species, this region is the place where the limits of their global ranges are located (Rana temporaria, R. amurensis, Bufotes sitibundus). West Siberia also has at least two non-native amphibian species (Pelophylax ridibundus, Bufotes viridis). The exact ranges and patterns of distribution of the West Siberian amphibian species are poorly studied. The mapping of species ranges is important for the development of conservation measures and monitoring of invasive species is required to investigate their impacts on the natural ecosystems.
This work presents the most complete biogeographic and occurrence records database of the amphibians of West Siberia. To assemble the database, we digitised data from 190 published works, obtained data from major museum collections and from the data bank on the abundance and distribution of animals «Zoomonitor» by the Zoomonitoring laboratory of the Institute of Systematics and Ecology of Animals, Siberian Branch of Russian Academy of Sciences. The database also includes original and partly unpublished data collected by the authors from 1975 to 2021, as well as quality-assessed citizen science data from the iNaturalist portal. In total, the database contains 2530 records for 11 species of amphibians, including the locality data, the observation date (when known) and the source of the observation (at least one of the following: literature reference, museum sample ID, observer’s name, iNaturalist link).
Anura, batrachofauna, bibliography, Bufonidae, Caudata, digitisation, Hynobiidae, Pelobatidae, Ranidae, Salamandridae, species occurrence
West Siberia is a vast area encompassing more than 2.4 million km2 in North Eurasia and lying between the Ural Mountains and the Yenisei River. West Siberia extends almost 3000 km from north to south and has five ecological zones: tundra, forest-tundra, taiga, forest-steppe, steppe and the Altai-Sayan mountain system with an altitudinal zonation (
First scarce data on amphibian fauna of West Siberia and adjacent parts of Kazakhstan were obtained in the second half of the 18th century and in the 19th century by such scientists and travellers as J. P.
Amongst the 11 species recorded in West Siberia, widely distributed species are the Siberian salamander Salamandrella keyserlingii Dybowski, 1870, the common toad Bufo bufo (Linnaeus, 1758), the moor frog Rana arvalis Nilsson, 1842 and the Siberian wood frog R. amurensis Boulenger, 1886. The eastern and north-eastern periphery of the ranges of the common newt Lissotriton vulgaris (Linnaeus, 1758), the Pallas’ spadefoot toad Pelobates vespertinus (Pallas, 1771), the variable toad Bufotes sitibundus (Pallas, 1771), Pewzow’s toad Bufotes pewzowi (Bedriaga, 1898), the common frog R. temporaria Linnaeus, 1758 and the frogs of Pelophylax ridibundus (Pallas, 1771) complex are located in the region. The green toad Bufotes viridis (Laurenti, 1768) exists in West Siberia outside its native range, as an inadvertently introduced species. Below, we provide a brief description of the distribution, habitats and regional conservation status of all amphibian species inhabiting West Siberia.
Salamandrella keyserlingii Dybowski, 1870
The Siberian salamander is the amphibian species with the largest native range in the world (
We report 290 locations where this species was observed in West Siberia, from 67.33°N to 52.04°N in latitude and throughout the whole region longitudinally.
The Siberian salamander is listed in the Red Books of Kurgan Oblast (category III, rare species) (
Lissotriton vulgaris (Linneus, 1758)
The territory of West Siberia is inhabited by the nominative subspecies, Lissotriton vulgaris vulgaris (
We report 176 registrations. The known northern limit of the distribution is declining to the south when moving to the east (from 62.0°N in Khanty-Mansi Autonomous Okrug to 56.5°N in Kemerovo Oblast). The southern distribution limit follows the transition zone between forest-steppe and steppe zones (from 54.7°N on the west to 51.1°N on the east). In the east, the distribution is limited by the Altai and Kuznetsk Alatau mountains. The easternmost known location is situated in Krasnoyarsk Krai (56.53°N 89.32°E).
The common newt is listed in the Red Books of Tyumen Oblast (category IV, data deficient) (
Rana amurensis Boulenger, 1886
The Siberian wood frog is an Asiatic species, which inhabits West and East Siberia, the Far East, North Korea, Manchuria, northern and central Mongolia. Several populations are known north of the Arctic Circle. The southern border of its range runs through southern Siberia to Mongolia, Manchuria and Korea (
We registered 115 records of the Siberian wood frog. The western border of the species range goes through the 63-62°E longitude. The northernmost record of the species in West Siberia is at 65.55°N.
The Siberian wood frog is listed in the Red Book of Kurgan Oblast (category III, rare species) (
Rana arvalis Nilsson, 1842
The moor frog is distributed from Western Europe (Germany, Belgium, Sweden) to East Siberia (Republics of Sakha and Buryatia (Russia)). The southern limit of the range lies in the steppe regions of north Kazakhstan and Mongolia and in the Altai mountains in Russia, north China and Mongolia (
In West Siberia, the moor frog is the most common amphibian species, which is present throughout the whole studied region, except the furthest north (Yamal and Gyda Peninsulas) and the highest areas of Altai Mountains. The species crosses the Arctic Circle and is distributed up to the Village Tazovskiy (67.47°N; the northernmost record of Amphibia in West Siberia). Here, we report 1137 records of the species.
Due to its abundance, the moor frog is not included in Red Data books in any of the administrative regions of West Siberia.
Rana temporaria Linnaeus, 1758
The common frog is distributed from the Pyrenees to the Urals and West Siberia. The north-eastern border of its range runs from the southern coast of the Barents Sea and the northern coast of the White Sea to southeast and east through the Komi Republic to the Rivers Ob and Irtysh. The south-eastern border of the range is situated in the Kurgan Oblast and north Kazakhstan (
We report 40 records of this species in West Siberia, from 67.0°N in the north to 55.43°N in the south and to 67.08°E in the east. The eastern border of the range in West Siberia is insufficiently known. In the Yamalo-Nenets Autonomous Okrug, only three populations are known, although there are more finds in the Khanty-Mansi Autonomous Okrug, where the common frog inhabits western and north-western parts of the region.
The common frog is listed in the Red Books of Tyumen and Kurgan Oblasts, Yamalo-Nenets and Khanty-Mansi Autonomous Okrugs as a rare species (category III) (
Pelophylax ridibundus (Pallas, 1771) complex
The frogs of P. ridibundus complex have a disjunct distribution in West Siberia due to its unintended introduction to some areas. The natural range of this group runs from Eastern Europe to the extreme southwest of Siberia, surrounding the Ural Mountains from the south, since these frogs do not inhabit the forested montane areas of the Urals (
In West Siberia, the western populations occur in Chelyabinsk Oblast, Sverdlovsk Oblast and Kurgan Oblast. Their origin is debatable and could represent natural range extension in the second half of the 20th century, spread of invasive populations or combination of both (
Bufo bufo (Linnaeus, 1758)
The common toad is widely distributed in Eurasia, including West and East Siberia. This species mainly inhabits forested areas and prefers swamped conifer forests. It is also encountered in mixed and leaf forests, groves, parks and gardens, where high humidity and dense vegetation are present (
We report 539 localities where the common toad occurs. The northern periphery of its range lies between 63.0°N and 64.0°N. The southern range margin in West Siberia is situated in Kurgan Oblast (Yurgamyshskiy and Ketovskiy Districts, at 55.0°N), then it runs through the south of Tyumen Oblast and east of Omsk Oblast to north-eastern Kazakhstan.
The common toad is listed in Red Data Books of Kurgan Oblast (category IV, data deficient) (
Bufotes viridis (Laurenti, 1768)
An isolated, apparently introduced population of green toads occurs in the vicinity of the city of Novosibirsk. In 1984, an established population of green toads already existed near Novosibirsk (
Bufotes sitibundus (Pallas, 1771)
The variable toad occurs in south-western parts of West Siberia. We report 26 records of this toad in West Siberia, all in the Chelyabinsk and Kurgan Oblasts. The northernmost location is at 56.21°N and the easternmost location lies at 65.45°E. The occurrence of this species is also possible in the Altai Krai, although there is currently no strong evidence for it.
Under the name “Pseudepidalea viridis”, it is listed in the Red Data Book of Kurgan Oblast (category III, rare species) (
Bufotes pewzowi (Bedriaga, 1898)
Historically, the green toads from the montane regions of the Altai Republic were presumed to belong to B. viridis. In 2010, the analysis of chromosome number and genome size revealed that they belong to the tetraploid species B. pewzowi (
The species is listed in the Red Book of Altai Republic (category III, rare species) (
Pelobates vespertinus (Pallas, 1771)
The Pallas’ spadefoot toad is distributed from Eastern Europe and Caucasus to West Siberia and Kazakhstan (
We report 32 records of this species in West Siberia. The north-eastern limit of its range is situated in the Tyumen Oblast (near the City Tobolsk, 58.17°N, 68.33°E).
The spadefoot toad is listed under the name “P. fuscus” in the Red Books of Tyumen and Sverdlovsk Oblasts as a rare species (category III) (
Database of Amphibia distribution in West Siberia (Russia)
Evgeniy Simonov, Valentina Kuranova, Artem Lisachev, Vadim Yartsev, Irina Bogomolova
The designated study area is limited on the south by the administrative border of the Russian Federation, by the Arctic Ocean shore on the north, by foothills of the eastern slope of Ural Mountains on the west and by the Yenisey River and administrative border of Tuva Republic on the East. The area extends up to about 1890 km from the west to the east and from north to south up to 2800 km. The total area equals about 2.4 million km2 and covers a number of zones (
Original field surveys data, available scientific literature, museum collections, personal reports and iNaturalist (https://www.inaturalist.org) observations were used to arrange the database. The species occurrence records were obtained from 190 publications. Data from specimens stored in the herpetological collections of the following museums were used: Zoological Museum of Moscow State University (ZMMU), Zoological Museum of Tomsk State University (TSU), Zoological Museum of Institute of Systematics and Ecology of Animals and Siberian Branch of Russian Academy of Sciences (ISEA). We also used data from the «Zoomonitor» database by the Zoomonitoring laboratory of Institute of Systematics and Ecology of Animals, Siberian Branch of RAS (http://eco.nsc.ru/zoomonit/zoomonit_r.htm). The geographical extent fully covered nine administrative regions of Russia (Kemerovo, Kurgan, Omsk, Novosibirsk, Tomsk and Tyumen Oblasts, Altai Krai, Altai and Khakasia Republics); almost fully, except for the most western parts - Khanty-Mansi and Yamalo-Nenets Autonomous Okrugs; eastern parts of Chelyabinsk and Sverdlovsk Oblasts and the western part of Krasnoyarsk Krai.
We collected the species occurrence data during field studies in Siberia in 1975-2021. The direct visual observations of animals were used most often, but in some cases, pitfall traps were employed. A portion of our data has been published earlier, but scattered in various publications and not always had a geographical coordinate reference. The majority of amphibia species records from publications were also made by direct observations.
The majority of data (including published literature) were collected by herpetologists. Personal communications from other researchers or amateur naturalists were included if accompanied by photos. For iNaturalist, we exported all “Research grade” observations of amphibians from the areas of interest. Then, the observations were manually checked and wrong species identifications were corrected. If the quality of photographs did not allow us to check the correctness of species identification, such observations were removed from our dataset. For each observation, we manually added the locality data (stateProvince, county and locality fields), based on the geographic coordinates, if these data were not determined automatically or not provided by authors of the observations. Incorrect or obsolete species names were corrected when adding records to the database. The modern names of administrative units were used. The compiled database went through several rounds of revision in a search of mistypes and other kinds of errors.
The occurrence records from literature or our own old data were georeferenced using Yandex (https://yandex.ru/maps) or Google (https://maps.google.ru/maps) maps services from verbal depictions of localities or using coordinates provided in these publications by authors. The same procedure was applied for the records from the museums’ collections.
Geographical coordinates for our own observations have been determined using hand-held GPS units (accuracy: 11 m) since 2007 in most cases.
The locality names reported in Russian were transliterated into English.
The statistical and spatial analyses of the final database were made using the Plotly library for Python and QGIS 3.16. Species richness map was created using FSC QGIS Plugin for biological recorders by aggregating records in a 40 km squares.
Bibliographic references were assembled in the original language and English translation; web-links to full texts or abstracts are provided when possible (Suppl. material
The study area is limited on the south by the administrative border of the Russian Federation, by the Arctic Ocean shore on the north, by foothills of eastern slope of Ural Mountains on the west and by the Yenisey River and administrative border of Tuva Republic on the east. The area extends up to about 1890 km from the west to the east and from north to south up to 2800 km. The total area equals about 2.4 million km2.
Amphibian records data have a very uneven distribution, resulting in a species richness map better reflecting ‘sampling effort’ than the real biogeographical pattern (Fig.
49.62 and 67.47 Latitude; 60.32 and 93.40 Longitude.
The database contains records for 11 species, representing seven genera, five families and two orders of Amphibia (Fig.
Rank | Scientific Name | Common Name |
---|---|---|
phylum | Chordata | chordates |
class | Amphibia | amphibians |
order | Caudata | salamanders |
order | Anura | frogs |
family | Hynobiidae | Asiatic salamanders |
family | Salamandridae | True salamanders |
family | Pelobatidae | European spadefoot toads |
family | Bufonidae | true toads |
family | Ranidae | true frogs |
species | Salamandrella keyserlingii Dybowski, 1870 | Siberian salamander |
species | Lissotriton vulgaris (Linneus, 1758) | common newt |
species | Pelobates vespertinus (Pallas, 1771) | Pallas’ spadefoot toad |
species | Bufotes sitibundus (Pallas, 1771) | variable toad |
species | Bufotes viridis (Laurenti, 1768) | green toad |
species | Bufotes pewzowi (Bedriaga, 1898) | Pewzow’s toad |
species | Bufo bufo (Linnaeus, 1758) | common toad |
species | Rana arvalis Nilsson, 1842 | moor frog |
species | Rana amurensis Boulenger, 1886 | Siberian wood frog |
species | Rana temporaria Linnaeus, 1758 | common frog |
species | Pelophylax ridibundus (Pallas, 1771) | marsh frog |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) 4.0 License.
The dataset includes a table in Darwin Core format with 21 fields and 2530 records. The earliest first record dates back to 1856 and the most recent event occurred in 2021 (
Column label | Column description |
---|---|
occurrenceID | An identifier for the Occurrence (as opposed to a particular digital record of the occurrence). In the absence of a persistent global unique identifier, construct one from a combination of identifiers in the record that will most closely make the occurrenceID globally unique. |
order | The full scientific name of the order in which the taxon is classified. |
family | The full scientific name of the family in which the taxon is classified. |
genus | The full scientific name of the genus in which the taxon is classified. |
scientificName | The full scientific name, with authorship and date information, if known. When forming part of an Identification, this should be the name in lowest level taxonomic rank that can be determined. This term should not contain identification qualifications, which should instead be supplied in the IdentificationQualifier term. |
country | The name of the country or major administrative unit in which the Location occurs. |
stateProvince | The name of the next smaller administrative region than country (state, province, canton, department, region etc.) in which the Location occurs. |
county | The full, unabbreviated name of the next smaller administrative region than stateProvince (county, shire, department etc.) in which the Location occurs. |
locality | The specific description of the place. Less specific geographic information can be provided in other geographic terms (higherGeography, continent, country, stateProvince, county, municipality, waterBody, island, islandGroup). This term may contain information modified from the original to correct perceived errors or standardise the description. |
verbatimCoordinates | The verbatim original spatial coordinates of the Location. The coordinate ellipsoid, geodeticDatum or full Spatial Reference System (SRS) for these coordinates should be stored in verbatimSRS and the coordinate system should be stored in verbatimCoordinateSystem. |
verbatimCoordinateSystem | The coordinate format for the verbatimLatitude and verbatimLongitude or the verbatimCoordinates of the Location. |
decimalLongitude | The geographic longitude (in decimal degrees, using the spatial reference system given in geodeticDatum) of the geographic centre of a Location. Positive values are east of the Greenwich Meridian, negative values are west of it. Legal values lie between -180 and 180, inclusive. |
decimalLatitude | The geographic latitude (in decimal degrees, using the spatial reference system given in geodeticDatum) of the geographic centre of a Location. Positive values are north of the Equator, negative values are south of it. Legal values lie between -90 and 90, inclusive. |
coordinateUncertaintyInMetres | The horizontal distance (in metres) from the given decimalLatitude and decimalLongitude describing the smallest circle containing the whole of the Location. |
geodeticDatum | The ellipsoid, geodetic datum or spatial reference system (SRS) upon which the geographic coordinates given in decimalLatitude and decimalLongitude are based. |
eventDate | The date-time or interval during which an Event occurred. For occurrences, this is the date-time when the event was recorded. Not suitable for a time in a geological context. |
basisOfRecord | The specific nature of the data record. |
recordedBy | A list (concatenated and separated) of names of people, groups or organisations responsible for recording the original Occurrence. The primary collector or observer, especially one who applies a personal identifier (recordNumber), should be listed first. |
associatedReferences | A list (concatenated and separated) of identifiers (publication, bibliographic reference, global unique identifier, URI) of literature associated with the Occurrence. |
institutionCode | The name (or acronym) in use by the institution having custody of the object(s) or information referred to in the record. |
materialSampleID | An identifier for the MaterialSample (as opposed to a particular digital record of the material sample). In the absence of a persistent global unique identifier, construct one from a combination of identifiers in the record that will most closely make the materialSampleID globally unique. |
We dedicate this paper to the memory of our deceased colleagues Vladimir Georgievich Ischenko (1938-2021) and Vladimir Aleksandrovich Yakovlev (1949-2020), acknowledging their invaluable contribution to the study of amphibians and reptiles of Urals and Siberia.
Evgeniy Simonov, Valentina Kuranova and Artem Lisachov wrote the original draft of the paper. Evgeniy Simonov prepared figures. Evgeniy Simonov, Valentina Kuranova, Artem Lisachov and Vadim Yartsev collected data in the field. Irina Bogomolova, as the administrator of the “Zoomonitor" database, provided the data on the amphibian records of the studied territory. All authors participated in compilation of bibliography, georeferencing and revision of the species occurrences included in the database. All authors also participated in revision of the paper.
The bibliography of research containing occurrence records for Amphibia in West Siberia.