Acrocalymma chuxiongense sp. nov., a new species of Acrocalymmaceae (Pleosporales) on leaves of Quercus

Yu-Wei Liu; Xiang-Yu Zeng

doi:10.3897/BDJ.10.e89635

Biodiversity Data Journal : Taxonomy & Inventories

PDF

Taxonomy & Inventories

Acrocalymma chuxiongense sp. nov., a new species of Acrocalymmaceae (Pleosporales) on leaves of Quercus

Yu-Wei Liu^‡, Xiang-Yu Zeng^‡

‡ Department of Plant Pathology, College of Agriculture, Guizhou University, Guiyang 550025, China

Corresponding author: Xiang-Yu Zeng (xyzeng3@gzu.edu.cn)

Academic editor: Ning Jiang

Received: 28 Jun 2022 | Accepted: 29 Jul 2022 | Published: 19 Aug 2022

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the CC0 Public Domain Dedication.

Citation: Liu Y-W, Zeng X-Y (2022) Acrocalymma chuxiongense sp. nov., a new species of Acrocalymmaceae (Pleosporales) on leaves of Quercus. Biodiversity Data Journal 10: e89635. https://doi.org/10.3897/BDJ.10.e89635

Abstract

Background

In Huafo Mountain, Mouding, Yunnan Province, China, we found black protrusions on the leaf surface of Quercus plants. The collection which we identified as Acrocalymma chuxiongense sp. nov., a new species of Acrocalymmaceae (Pleosporales) is characterised by dome-shaped ascomata, bitunicate asci with pedicel furcate and an ocular chamber and hyaline, obovoid to ellipsoid, 1-septate ascospores.

New information

Morphologically, this species is typical with obovoid to ellipsoid, larger ascospores than other known species in Acrocalymma. Phylogenetic analysis also showed that it represents a distinct clade, distant to any other species of Acrocalymma. Therefore, we introduce it as Acrocalymma chuxiongense, a new species of Acrocalymmaceae. This study is adding to the current situation where there are very few species and lack of teleomorph characteristics.

Keywords

morphology, new taxa, pathogen, phylogeny

Introduction

The genus Acrocalymma was introduced by Alcorn and Irwin (1987), to accommodate a root pathogen, Acrocalymma medicaginis, on Medicago in Australia (Alcorn and Irwin 1987, Farr et al. 1998). The anamorph of Acrocalymma has cylindrical and hyaline conidia with a helmet-shaped mucilaginous appendage at each end (Alcorn and Irwin 1987, Zhang et al. 2012, Jayasiri et al. 2019). The teleomorph of Acrocalymma has ostiolate ascomata, 8-spored asci and fusiform ascospores, with hyaline sheath (Shoemaker et al. 1991). Zhang et al. (2012) described the second species, A. aquatica Huang Zhang & K.D. Hyde, from submerged wood in Thailand. The third species, A. cycadis Crous & R.G. Shivas, was introduced by Crous et al. (2014) and it differs from A. medicaginis and A. aquatica by its larger conidia. Trakunyingcharoen et al. (2014) revised the genus Sphaerellopsis and transferred S. filum (CBS 317.76) to Acrocalymma. They also proved that Acrocalymma and Rhizopycnis are congeneric, based on molecular and morphology results, therefore, transferred Rhizopycnis vagum to Acrocalymma. Likewise, Massarina walkeri is synonymised under Acrocalymma (Trakunyingcharoen et al. 2014). Phylogenetically, the genus Acrocalymma represents an undefined lineage in the Pleosporales, so a new family Acrocalymmaceae was introduced by Trakunyingcharoen et al. (2014) to accommodate Acrocalymma as the type genus.

At present, Acrocalymma includes 11 species viz. A. ampeli, A. aquaticum, A. bipolare, A. cycadis, A. fici, A. hongheense, A. medicaginis, A. pterocarpi, A. vagum, A. walkeri and A. yuxiense. The major species are reported from terrestrial habitats (Hongsanan et al. 2020a, Hongsanan et al. 2020b, Tennakoon et al. 2021), while A. aquaticum and A. bipolare are freshwater species. A. medicaginis and A. vagum are reported as root pathogens on Medicago and Cucumis, respectively (Alcorn and Irwin 1987, Farr et al. 1998).

This study introduces a new species in Acrocalymma collected from Chuxiong, Yunnan, China, based on morphological description and phylogenetic analysis.

Materials and methods

Sample Collection and Isolation

Fresh fungal materials were collected from leaves of Quercus sp. in Huafo Mountain of Mouding County (Yunnan Province, China). The Mountain is located at 24˚09’–25˚40’N, 101˚18’–101˚51’E at an elevation of 1900–2588 m above sea level. The mountain ranges from north to south and is located on the windward side of the southeast airstream, which is warm, humid and rainy and the air humidity is high. This area also has an annual average rainfall of 1029 mm and an annual average temperature of 12.1˚C–13.5˚C (Zhang et al. 2012). The collected specimens were brought to the laboratory in paper envelopes. Samples were examined with a compound light microscope (Zeiss Scope 5). Healthy leaf tissues and the margins of diseased tissues of each leaf spot were cut into 6 mm square sections and surface-sterilised as follows. These sections were initially soaked in 0.5% sodium hypochlorite for 2 minutes, then 1 minute in sterile distilled water, 2 minutes in 75% ethanol and, finally, 1 minute in sterile distilled water. The sterilised fragments were then plated on potato dextrose agar and incubated at 25°C for 6-8 days or until mycelia growing from the leaf fragments were observed (Yu et al. 2022). The holotype was deposited at the Herbarium of IFRD (International Fungal Research & Development Centre; Institute of Highland Forest Science, Chinese Academy of Forestry, Kunming, China). The ex-type living culture was deposited at the Culture Collection of the Herbarium of IFRD (IFRDCC) (Li et al. 2022). The MycoBank number was registered (Crous et al. 2014).

Morphological Observations

Photographs of the ascomata were taken using a stereomicroscope (Keyence VHX-7000 digital microscope). Observations and photomicrographs were made from material mounted in lactic acid (60%) using a compound light microscope (Zeiss Scope 5) equipped with an AxioCam 208 colour camera with interference contrast optics. All measurements were made with ZEN2 (blue edition) and images used for figures were processed with Adobe Photoshop version 2022 software.

DNA Extraction, PCR Amplififications and Sequencing

Fungal isolates were grown on PDA for 20 days at 25°C in the dark. DNA was extracted from the pure culture with a Biospin Fungus Genomic DNA Extraction Kit (BioFlux, China) according to the manufacturer’s instructions (Hangzhou, P.R. China). The internal transcribed spacer (ITS), along with the 5.8S ribosomal rDNA, was amplified with the primer pair ITS1 and ITS4 (White et al. 1990). The partial large subunit (LSU) ribosomal rDNA was amplified with the primer pair LR0R and LR5 (Vilgalys and Hester 1990, Rehner and Samuels 1994). The amplification reactions were carried out with the following protocol: 20 μl reaction volume containing 1 µl of DNA template, 2 µl of each forward and reverse primers, 17 µl of GoldenStar T6 Super PCR Mix (1.1×). The PCR conditions were: an initial denaturation step of 5 min at 95°C, followed by 35 cycles of 30 s at 95°C, 50 s at 55°C (ITS) and 55°C (LSU) and 90 s at 72°C and a final elongation step of 10 min at 72°C (Wanasinghe et al. 2020). PCR amplification products were assayed via electrophoresis in 1% agarose. The PCR products were sent to Tsingke Biotechnology Co., Ltd., Beijing, China. The nucleotide sequence data acquired was deposited in GenBank (Table 1).

Table 1.

Download as

CSV

XLSX

Taxa used in the phylogenetic analysis of Acrocalymmaceae and their corresponding GenBank numbers. The newly generated sequences are indicated in bold. NA: Sequence data not available in GenBank. T = ex-type strain.

Species	Strain no.	GenBank accession no.		Reference
Species	Strain no.	ITS	LSU	Reference
Acrocalymma ampeli	MFLU 19-2734	MW063150	MW063211	Tennakoon et al. (2021)
Acrocalymma ampeli	NCYU19-0008	MW063151	MW063212	Tennakoon et al. (2021)
Acrocalymma aquaticum	MFLUCC 11-0208 T	JX276951	JX276952	Zhang et al. (2012)
Acrocalymma bipolare	MD1321 T	NA	MN913734	Dong et al. (2020)
Acrocalymma cycadis	CBS 137972 T	KJ869124	KJ869181	Crous et al. (2014)
*Acrocalymma chuxiongense*	IFRDCC3104	ON595715	ON596248	This study
Acrocalymma fici	CBS 317.76 T	KP170619	KP170712	Trakunyingcharoen et al. (2014)
Acrocalymma hongheense	HKAS 111909 T	MW424761	MW424775	Mortimer et al. (2021)
Acrocalymma medicaginis	CPC 24340 T	KP170620	KP170713	Trakunyingcharoen et al. (2014)
Acrocalymma medicaginis	MFLUCC 17-1423	MT214338	MT214432	Mapook et al. (2020)
Acrocalymma pterocarpi	MFLUCC 17-0926 T	MK347732	MK347949	Jayasiri et al. (2019)
Acrocalymma pterocarpi	NC 13-171	LC517880	LC517881	Unpublished
Acrocalymma vagum	CPC 24226	KP170636	NA	Trakunyingcharoen et al. (2014)
Acrocalymma vagum	CPC 24225	KP170635	NA	Trakunyingcharoen et al. (2014)
Acrocalymma walkeri	CBS 257.93	MH862398	FJ795454	[1] Zhang et al. (2009) [2] Vu et al. (2019)
Acrocalymma yuxiense	HKAS 111910 T	NA	MW424778	Mortimer et al. (2021)

Phylogenetic Analyses

Sequences of each gene generated from forward and reverse primers were assembled with BioEdit version 7.2.5 (Hall 1999) to obtain consensus sequences. Related sequences were selected and downloaded from GenBank. Each gene dataset was aligned separately by MAFFT version 7.187 (Katoh and Standley 2013) and manually aligned where necessary. Phylogenetic trees, based on LSU and ITS individual datasets as well as a concatenated dataset (LSU and ITS), were analysed using Maximum Likelihood (ML) and Bayesian Inference at the CIPRES web portal (Miller et al. 2010). The ML analysis was carried out using the RAxML‐HPC BlackBox tool (Stamatakis 2014). One thousand non-parametric bootstrap iterations were used with a general time reversible (GTR) model and a discrete gamma distribution, plus estimating the proportion of invariable sites (Stamatakis et al. 2008). Bayesian Inference was undertaken using the MrBayes on XSEDE tool (Ronquist et al. 2012), based on the nucleotide substitution models determined by the Bayesian information criterion using the jModelTest2 on XSEDE tool (Darriba et al. 2012) at the CIPRES web portal. The Markov Chain Monte Carlo algorithm of four chains started from a random tree topology with two parallel runs. Trees were sampled every 1000 generations and the run was stopped automatically when the average standard deviation of split frequencies fell below 0.01. A 50% majority rule consensus tree was summarised after discarding the first 25% of samples. The resulting trees were visualised in FigTree version 1.4.3.

Taxon treatment

Acrocalymma chuxiongense Y. W. Liu & X. Y. Zeng, sp. nov.

MycoBank 844399

Material Download as CSV

Holotype:

scientificName:
Acrocalymma chuxiongense
; kingdom:
Fungi
; class:
Dothideomycetes
; order:
Pleosporales
; family:
Acrocalymmaceae
; genus:
Acrocalymma
; country:
China
; stateProvince:
Yunnan
; county:
Mouding
; locality:
Huafo Mountain
; locationRemarks:
Yunnan, Mouding, Huafo Mountain, 2021.10.7, Liu Yu wei
; verbatimCoordinates:
25°19'8"N 101°25'7"E
; catalogNumber:
IFRD9449
; recordedBy:
Liu Yu-Wei
; identifiedBy:
Yu-Wei Liu
; dateIdentified:
2022
; language:
en
; occurrenceID:
living culture IFRDCC3104

Description

Habitat terrestrial, epiphytic with dome-shaped black protrusions on living leaves of Quercus sp. Teleomorph: Ascomata 50–80 µm high, 270–320 µm in diam. (average = 70 × 280 µm, n = 10), dark brown, gregarious, erumpent to nearly superficial, visible as numerous, raised, dome-shaped areas on host surface, globose, uni-loculate, glabrous with rough walls, coriaceous. Peridium 10–30 µm wide, of unequal thickness, composed of dark brown to black cells, arranged in textura angularis. Asci 130–170 × 40–45 µm, (average = 150 × 40 µm, n = 20), 8-spored, bitunicate, pedicel furcate, apically rounded with an ocular chamber. Ascospores 35–45 × 18–20 µm, (average = 40 × 20 µm, n = 40), overlapping, bi-seriate, hyaline, obovoid to ellipsoid, 1-septate, constricted at the septum, with conically rounded ends, upper cell larger than lower cell, smooth-walled (Fig. 2). Anamorph: Undetermined.

Figure 1.

Bayesian Inference (BI) phylogenetic tree, based on a combined dataset of partial LSU and ITS sequence data. Bootstrap support values for ML equal to or greater than 50%, Bayesian posterior probabilities equal to or greater than 0.9 are shown as ML/BI above the nodes. The new isolates are in red. The scale bar represents the expected number of nucleotide substitutions per site. The tree was rooted with Acrocalymma aquaticum (MFLUCC 11-0208).

Figure 2.

Acrocalymma chuxiongense (IFRD9449). a–d Ascomata on living leaves of Quercus sp.; e Vertical sections through a ascoma; f–h Asci; i Ocular chamber; j Pedicel; k–n Ascospores. Scale bars: b = 2000 µm, c = 1000 µm, d = 500 µm, e–h = 50 µm, i–n = 25 µm.

Culture Characteristics: Colonies grew on PDA at 25⁰C in the dark and reached 4 cm in diam., within 14 days, dense, circular, slightly raised in the middle, entire margin off-white to grey in surface view.

Etymology

The specific epithet reflects Chuxiong, from where the specimen was collected.

Notes

The teleomorph of Acrocalymma chuxiongense was similar to A. pterocarpi, but can be distinguished by the shape and size of ascospores. Our new collection has a larger ascospore (35–45 × 18–20 µm) than Acrocalymma pterocarpi (17–21 × 3–5 µm) (Jayasiri et al. 2019). The shape of ascospores of the new collection is obovoid to ellipsoid, while Acrocalymma pterocarpi has fusiform ascospores. Additionally, the upper cells of our new collection’s ascospores are larger than the lower cells, while the upper and lower cells of A. pterocarpi are similar in size. Phylogenetic analysis, based on ITS and LSU sequence data, showed that Acrocalymma chuxiongense forms a distinct lineage sister to A. pterocarpi (Fig. 1). The GenBank accession number for TEF of our new isolate is ON604684. A comparison of the ITS and LSU nucleotides of A. chuxiongense and A. medicaginis (the type) reveals 10 (2%) and 3 (1%) nucleotide differences. Comparing the ITS and LSU nucleotides of A. chuxiongense and A. pterocarpi, there are 11 (3%) and 5 (1%) nucleotide differences, respectively.

Analysis

Phylogenetic Analyses

The alignment comprised 16 strains with 1322 total characters including gaps. The best nucleotide substitution model for LSU and ITS is K80+I and TIM2ef+G, respectively. The RAxML analysis of the combined dataset yielded a best scoring tree with a final ML optimisation likelihood value of -2834.090234. Estimated base frequencies are as follows: A = 0.240753, C = 0.220941, G = 0.279900, T = 0.258406; substitution rates AC = 3.347637, AG = 2.128594, AT = 3.236536, CG = 0.316367, CT = 10.359429, GT = 1.000000; proportion of invariable sites I = 0.752805; gamma distribution shape parameter α = 0.633740. The Bayesian analysis ran (92000) generations before the average standard deviation for split frequencies reached (0.008966). The analysis generated (1842) trees, from which 1382 were sampled after 46 of the trees were discarded as burn-in. Our new collection forms a distinct clade, distant to any other species in Acrocalymma (Fig. 1).

Discussion

In this study, we introduced a new species, Acrocalymma chuxiongense, from living leaves of Quercus, based on phylogenetic analysis and morphological comparisons.

Acrocalymma species are able to produce pycnidia in culture easily (Trakunyingcharoen et al. 2014). It can be seen from Table 2 and Table 3 that, amongst the 11 species of Acrocalymma, only A. pterocarpi, A. hongheense and A. walkeri have teleomorph characteristics and the others have only anamorph characteristics. However, we failed to obtain the anamorph of Acrocalymma chuxiongense under similar conditions. In addition, the ostiole, hamathecium and sheath were not observed in our collection. At the same time, the species of Acrocalymma are mainly distinguished by the size of conidia. It can be seen from Table 2 that the ascospores of our new isolate are the largest compared with A. pterocarpi, A. hongheense and A. walkeri. The ascospores of our new isolate are obovoid to ellipsoid and the other three are fusiform.

Table 2.

Download as

CSV

XLSX

Comparison of teleomorph of Acrocalymma sp.

Species	Ascomata	Asci	Ascospores	Locality	Reference
Acrocalymma chuxiongense	50–80 µm high, 270–320 µm in diam., gregarious, dark brown.	130–170 × 40–45 µm	35–45 × 18–20 µm, hyaline, obovoid to ellipsoid, 1-septate, upper cell larger than lower cell.	Yunnan	This study
Acrocalymma hongheense	180–220 µm high, 160–200 µm diam., gregarious, dark brown, ostiolate.	100–140 × 15–22 µm	25–35 × 9.5–11 µm, hyaline, 1-septate, fusiform, with a sheath, the expansion near the septate.	Yunnan	Mortimer et al. (2021)
Acrocalymma pterocarpi	140–150 µm high, 130–145 µm diam., scattered, black, without ostiole.	65–75 × 7–12 µm	17–21 × 3–5 µm, hyaline, fusiform, 1-3 septate, guttulate, sheath present in immature stage.	Thailand	Jayasiri et al. (2019)
Acrocalymma walkeri	160–180(225) µm wide, 160–180(225) µm high, covered with light grey hairs.	50–80 × 8–11µm	19–22 × 4.5–5.5 µm, pale reddish-brown, 3-septate, fusiform, with a sheath.	Australia	Shoemaker et al. (1991)

Table 3.

Download as

CSV

XLSX

Comparison of anamorph of Acrocalymma sp.

Species	Conidia				Locality	Reference
Species	Size	Color	Shape	Apex and base	Locality	Reference
Acrocalymma hongheense	20–35 × 7–9 µm	hyaline	subcylindrical	obtusely rounded and with mucoid ooze at the apex, protuberant and with a rounded hilum at base.	Yunnan	Mortimer et al. (2021)
Acrocalymma yuxiense	15–21 × 4–5 µm	hyaline	subcylindrical	obtusely rounded at apex and base, guttulate.	Yunnan	Mortimer et al. (2021)
Acrocalymma fici	(12–)13–15(–16) × 2.5(–3) µm	hyaline	cylindrical	cylindrical with subobtuse apex, acutely tapered at base to a small flattened central scar, with flaring mucoid apical appendage, visible in water mounts.	India	Trakunyingcharoen et al. (2014)
Acrocalymma medicaginis	(11–)13–15(–16) × (3.5–)4 µm	hyaline	subcylindrical	apex obtuse, tapering at base to truncate hilum, ends with mucoid caps.	Australia	Trakunyingcharoen et al. (2014)
Acrocalymma vagum	(16–)18–25(–28)×(4.0–)4.5–6.0(–6.9) µm	hyaline to brown	cylindrical to fusiform	apex rounded, base obtuse or tapering abruptly to a truncate base, guttulate.	Spain, USA	Farr et al. (1998)
Acrocalymma ampeli	17–19 × 5.5–6.5 µm	hyaline	cylindrical to fusoid	apex obtuse, unicellular, with flaring mucoid apical appendage at lower end, visible in water mounts.	Taiwan	Tennakoon et al. (2021)
Acrocalymma aquatica	12–17 × 3–4 µm	hyaline	cylindrical to fusoid	truncate at the base and becoming a little narrower at apex with a mucilaginous helmet-shaped appendage.	Thailand	Zhang et al. (2012)
Acrocalymma bipolare	9–12 × 3–5 µm	hyaline	cylindrical to fusiform	with rounded apex and slightly narrow, truncate base, with mucoid polar appendages that are filled with oil droplets, appendages elongate in water to form filaments.	Egypt	Dong et al. (2020)
Acrocalymma cycadis	(25–)28–32(–35) × (4–)5 µm	hyaline	subcylindrical	apex obtusely rounded, hilum truncate, guttulate.	Australia	Crous et al. (2014)

All species of Acrocalymma have sequence data in GenBank, but most have only ITS and LSU sequences and lack SSU and TEF sequences. On the other hand, sequence data of TEF were not used in the phylogenetic analyses due to lack of relevant data. Enriching the sequence data will provide more comprehensive phylogenetic relationships of the genus.

So far, only 11 species of Acrocalymma have been reported, indicating that Acrocalymma has great research potential. The future investigations of Acrocalymma will reveal more undiscovered species.

Acknowledgements

This study was funded by the Natural Science Special Research Fund of Guizhou University, Special Post 2021(25).

References

Alcorn JL, Irwin JAG (1987)

Acrocalymma medicaginis gen. et sp. nov. causing root and crown rot of Medicago sativa in Australia

Transactions of the British Mycological Society

(

163

‑

167

. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0007-1536(87)80211-5

Crous PW, Shivas RG, Quaedvlieg W, Van der Bank M, Zhang Y, Summerell BA, Guarro J, Wingfield MJ, Wood AR, Alfenas AC, Braun U, Cano-Lira JF, García D, Marin-Felix Y, Alvarado P, Andrade JP, Armengol J, Assefa A, den Breeÿen A, Camele I, Cheewangkoon R, De Souza JT, Duong TA, Esteve-Raventós F, Fournier J, Frisullo S, García-Jiménez J, Gardiennet A, Gené J, Hernández-Restrepo M, Hirooka Y, Hospenthal DR, King A, Lechat C, Lombard L, Mang SM, Marbach PAS, Marincowitz S, Marin-Felix Y, Montaño-Mata NJ, Moreno G, Perez CA, Pérez Sierra AM, Robertson JL, Roux J, Rubio E, Schumacher RK, Stchigel AM, Sutton DA, Tan YP, Thompson EH, Vanderlinde E, Walker AK, Walker DM, Wickes BL, Wong PTW, Groenewald JZ (2014)

Fungal Planet description sheets: 214–280

Persoonia

184

‑

306

. https://doi.org/10.3767/003158514X682395

Darriba D, Taboada GL, Doallo R, Posada D (2012)

jModelTest 2: more models, new heuristics and parallel computing

Nature Methods

(

772

‑

772

. https://doi.org/10.1038/nmeth.2109

Dong W, Wang B, Hyde KD, McKenzie EHC, Raja HA, Tanaka K, Abdel-Wahab MA, Abdel-Aziz FA, Doilom M, Phookamsak R, Hongsanan S, Wanasinghe DN, Yu XD, Wang GN, Yang H, Yang J, Thambugala KM, Tian Q, Luo ZL, Yang JB, Miller AN, Fournier J, Boonmee S, Hu DM, Nalumpang S, Zhang H (2020)

Freshwater Dothideomycetes

Fungal Diversity

105

(

319

‑

575

. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13225-020-00463-5

Farr DF, Miller ME, Bruton BD (1998)

Rhizopycnis vagum gen. et sp. nov., a new coelomycetous fungus from roots of melons and sugarcane

Mycologia

(

290

‑

296

. https://doi.org/10.1080/00275514.1998.12026909

Hall TA (1999)

BioEdit: a user-friendly biological sequence alignment editor and analysis program for Windows 95/98/NT

Nucleic Acids Symposium Series

(

‑

Hongsanan S, Hyde KD, Phookamsak R, Wanasinghe DN, McKenzie EHC, Sarma VV, Lücking R, Boonmee S, Bhat JD, Liu NG, Tennakoon DS, Pem D, Karunarathna A, Jiang SH, Jones GEB, Phillips AJL, Manawasinghe IS, Tibpromma S, Jayasiri SC, Sandamali D, Jayawardena RS, Wijayawardene NN, Ekanayaka AH, Jeewon R, Lu YZ, Phukhamsakda C, Dissanayake AJ, Zeng XY, Luo ZL, Tian Q, Thambugala KM, Dai D, Samarakoon MC, Chethana KWT, Ertz D, Doilom M, Liu JK, Pérez-Ortega S, Suija A, Senwanna C, Wijesinghe SN, Niranjan M, Zhang SN, Ariyawansa HA, Jiang HB, Zhang JF, Norphanphoun C, De Silva NI, Thiyagaraja V, Zhang H, Bezerra JDP, Miranda-González R, Aptroot A, Kashiwadani H, Harishchandra D, Sérusiaux E, Abeywickrama PD, Bao DF, Devadatha B, Wu HX, Moon KH, Gueidan C, Schumm F, Bundhun D, Mapook A, Monkai J, Bhunjun CS, Chomnunti P, Suetrong S, Chaiwan N, Dayarathne MC, Yang J, Rathnayaka AR, Xu JC, Zheng J, Liu G, Feng Y, Xie N (2020a)

Refined families of Dothideomycetes: orders and families incertae sedis in Dothideomycetes

Fungal Diversity

105

‑

318

. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13225-020-00462-6

Hongsanan S, Hyde KD, Phookamsak R, Wanasinghe DN, McKenzie EHC, Sarma VV, Boonmee S, Lücking R, Bhat DJ, Liu NG, Tennakoon DS, Pem D, Karunarathna A, Jiang SH, Jones EBG, Phillips AJL, Manawasinghe IS, Tibpromma S, Jayasiri SC, Sandamali DS, Jayawardena RS, Wijayawardene NN, Ekanayaka AH, Jeewon R, Lu YZ, Dissanayake AJ, Zeng XY, Luo ZL, Tian Q, Phukhamsakda C, Thambugala KM, Dai DQ, Chethana KWT, Samarakoon MC, Ertz D, Bao DF, Doilom M, Liu JK, Pérez-Ortega S, Suija A, Senwanna C, Wijesinghe SN, Konta S, Niranjan M, Zhang SN, Ariyawansa HA, Jiang HB, Zhang JF, Norphanphoun C, De Silva NI, Thiyagaraja V, Zhang H, Bezerra JDP, Miranda-González R, Aptroot A, Kashiwadani H, Harishchandra D, Sérusiaux E, Aluthmuhandiram JVS, Abeywickrama PD, Devadatha B, Wu HX, Moon KH, Gueidan C, Schumm F, Bundhun D, Mapook A, Monkai J, Chomnunti P, Suetrong S, Chaiwan N, Dayarathne MC, Yang J, Rathnayaka AR, Bhunjun CS, Xu JC, Zheng JS, Liu G, Feng Y, Xie N (2020b)

Refined families of Dothideomycetes: Dothideomycetidae and Pleosporomycetidae

Mycosphere

(

1553

‑

2107

. https://doi.org/10.5943/mycosphere/11/1/13

Jayasiri SC, Hyde KD, Jones EBG, Mckenzie E, Jeewon R, Phillips AJL, Bhat DJ, Wanasinghe DN, Liu JK, Lu YZ, Kang JC, Xu J, Karunarathna SC (2019)

Diversity, morphology and molecular phylogeny of Dothideomycetes on decaying wild seed pods and fruits

Mycosphere

(

‑

186

. https://doi.org/10.5943/mycosphere/10/1/1

Katoh K, Standley DM (2013)

MAFFT multiple sequence alignment software version 7: improvements in performance and usability

Molecular Biology and Evolution

(

772

‑

780

. https://doi.org/10.1093/molbev/mst010

Li JC, Wu HX, Li Y, Li XH, Song JY, Suwannarach N, Wijayawardene NN (2022)

Taxonomy, phylogenetic and ancestral area reconstruction in Phyllachora, with four novel species from Northwestern China

Journal of Fungi

(

520

. https://doi.org/10.3390/jof8050520

Mapook A, Hyde KD, Mckenzie EHC, Jones EBG, Bhat DJ, Jeewon R, Stadler M, Samarakoon MC, Malaithong M, Tanunchai B, Buscot F, Wubet T, Purahong W (2020)

Taxonomic and phylogenetic contributions to fungi associated with the invasive weed Chromolaena odorata (Siam weed)

Fungal Diversity

101

‑

175

. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13225-020-00444-8

Miller MA, Pfeiffer W, Schwartz T (2010)

Creating the CIPRES science gateway for inference of large phylogenetic trees

Gateway Computing Environments Workshop (GCE), 2010

New Orleans

14 November, 2010

IEEE

[ISBN

1424497515

]. https://doi.org/10.1109/GCE.2010.5676129

Mortimer PE, Jeewon R, Xu JC, Lumyong S, Wanasinghe DN (2021)

Morpho-phylo taxonomy of novel dothideomycetousfungi associated with dead woody twigs in Yunnan Province, China

Frontiers in Microbiology

https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2021.654683

Rehner SA, Samuels GJ (1994)

Taxonomy and phylogeny of Gliocladium analysed from nuclear large subunit ribosomal DNA sequences

Mycological Research

(

625

‑

634

. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0953-7562(09)80409-7

Ronquist F, Teslenko M, Mark PVD, Ayres DL, Darling A, Höhna S, Larget B, Liu L, Suchard MA, Huelsenbeck JP (2012)

MrBayes 3.2: efficient Bayesian phylogenetic inference and model choice across a large model space

Systematic Biology

(

539

‑

542

. https://doi.org/10.1093/sysbio/sys029

Shoemaker RA, Babcock CE, Irwin JAG (1991)

Massarina walkeri n. sp., the teleomorph of Acrocalymma medicaginis from Medicago sativa contrasted with Leptosphaeria pratensis, L. weimeri n. sp., and L. viridella

Canadian Journal of Botany

(

569

‑

573

. https://doi.org/10.1139/b91-077

Stamatakis A, Hoover P, Rougemont J (2008)

A rapid bootstrap algorithm for the RAxML web servers

Systematic Biology

(

758

‑

771

. https://doi.org/10.1080/10635150802429642

Stamatakis A (2014)

RAxML version 8: a tool for phylogenetic analysis and post-analysis of large phylogenies

Bioinformatics

(

1312

‑

1313

. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btu033

Tennakoon DS, Kuo CH, Maharachchikumbura SSN, Thambugala KM, Gentekaki E, Phillips AJL, Bhat DJ, Wanasinghe DN, De Silva NI, Promputtha I, Hyde KD (2021)

Taxonomic and phylogenetic contributions to Celtis formosana, Ficus ampelas, F. septica, Macaranga tanarius and Morus australis leaf litter inhabiting microfungi

Fungal Diversity

108

(

‑

215

. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13225-021-00474-w

Trakunyingcharoen T, Lombard L, Groenewald JZ, Cheewangkoon R, Toanun C, Alfenas AC, Crous PW (2014)

Mycoparasitic species of Sphaerellopsis, and allied lichenicolous and other genera

IMA Fungus

(

391

‑

414

. https://doi.org/10.5598/imafungus.2014.05.02.05

Vilgalys R, Hester M (1990)

Rapid genetic identification and mapping of enzymatically amplified ribosomal DNA from several Cryptococcus species

Journal of Bacteriology

172

(

4238

‑

4246

. https://doi.org/10.1128/jb.172.8.4238-4246.1990

Vu D, Groenewald M, De Vries M, Gehrmann T, Stielow B, Eberhardt U, Al-Hatmi A, Groenewald JZ, Cardinali G, Houbraken J, Boekhout T, Crous PW, Robert V, Verkley GJM (2019)

Large-scale generation and analysis of filamentous fungal DNA barcodes boosts coverage for kingdomfungi and reveals thresholds for fungal species and higher taxon delimitation

Studies in Mycology

135

‑

154

. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.simyco.2018.05.001

Wanasinghe DN, Wijayawardene NN, Xu J, Cheewangkoon R, Mortimer PE (2020)

Taxonomic novelties in Magnolia-associated pleosporaleanfungi in the Kunming Botanical Gardens (Yunnan, China)

PLОS One

(

). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0235855

White TJ, Bruns TD, Lee SB, Taylor JW (1990)

Amplification and direct sequencing of fungal ribosomal RNA genes for phylogenetics

. In: Innis MA, Gelfand DH, Sninsky JJ, White TJ (Eds)

PCR protocols: a guide to methods and applications

Academic Press

San Diego

315-322

pp. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-372180-8.50042-1

Yu Z, Jiang X, Zheng H, Zhang H, Qiao M (2022)

Fourteen new species of foliar Colletotrichum associated with the invasive plant Ageratina adenophora and surrounding crops

Journal of Fungi

(

185

. https://doi.org/10.3390/jof8020185

Zhang H, Hyde KD, Mckenzie EHC, Bahkali AH, Zhou D (2012)

Sequence data reveals phylogenetic affinities of Acrocalymma aquatica sp. nov., Aquasubmersa mircensis gen. et sp. nov. and Clohesyomyces aquaticus (freshwater coelomycetes)

Cryptogamie Mycologie

(

333

‑

346

. https://doi.org/10.7872/crym.v33.iss3.2012.333

Zhang Y, Wang HK, Fournier J, Crous PW, Jeewon R, Pointing SB, Hyde KD (2009)

Towards a phylogenetic clarification of Lophiostoma/Massarina and morphologically similar genera in the Pleosporales

Fungal Diversity

225

‑

251

Zhang Y, Xu YZ, Zheng ZX, Liu XK, Wang L, Ou XK (2012)

Analyses of diversity and distribution characteristics of macro-fungi in Huafo Mountain Nature Reserve of Yunnan Province

Journal of Plant Resources and Environment

(

111

‑

117

Supplementary material

Endnotes