Biodiversity Data Journal :
Taxonomy & Inventories
|
Corresponding author: Antonio Marques Pereira Júnior (junior.ampj@gmail.com)
Academic editor: Tiago Kütter Krolow
Received: 06 Jul 2022 | Accepted: 02 Sep 2022 | Published: 16 Sep 2022
© 2022 Antonio Pereira Júnior, Moreno Rodrigues, Jansen Medeiros
This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Citation:
Pereira Júnior AM, Rodrigues MMS, Medeiros JF (2022) Updating the knowledge of sand flies (Diptera, Psychodidae) in Rondônia State, Brazil. Biodiversity Data Journal 10: e90015. https://doi.org/10.3897/BDJ.10.e90015
|
|
Sandflies are insects important for the transmission cycles of the leishmaniases. Despite being studied since the 1960s in the State of Rondônia (Brazil), several gaps exist regarding our working knowledge of these insects. This study aimed to construct an up-to-date database of sandflies using complementary information from the speciesLink database and the scientific literature, as well as to elaborate integrated abundance maps. We identified 153,155 records of sandflies captured in Rondônia between 1965-2021; after exclusion, 147,258 reports (speciesLink - 3,408, Rondônia studies – 143,850) associated with 15 genera and 140 species were mapped. The most abundant species observed were Psychodopygus davisi (Root, 1934) (43,818 records), Nyssomyia whitmani (Antunes & Coutinho, 1939) (12,594), Psychodopygus carrerai (Barretto, 1946) (11,840), Psychodopygus hirsutus (Mangabeira, 1942) (9,676), Nyssomyia antunesi (Coutinho, 1939) (8,847), Trichophoromyia ubiquitalis (Mangabeira, 1942) (5,505), Psychodopygus geniculatus (Mangabeira, 1941) (4,644), Pintomyia nevesi (Damasceno & Arouck, 1956) (4,140), Trichophoromyia auraensis (Mangabeira, 1942) (3,579), Psychodopygus complexus (Mangabeira, 1941) (2,659), Nyssomyia fraihai (Martins, Falcão & Silva, 1979) (2,504) and Bichromomyia flaviscutellata (Mangabeira, 1942) (1,418). A total of 20 records of Leishmania detection corresponded to eight sand fly species. The present dataset provides updated information on the distribution of sandflies of Rondônia, including those considered potential vectors of Leishmania, which should prove useful to guide future studies.
The present study provides an extensive dataset built from all studies reporting phlebotomine sandflies in the Brazilian State of Rondônia. Online distribution maps can aid scientists who wish to consult the updated list of sand fly species and view the distribution of these insects, as well as those considered potential vectors of Leishmania. The results of the present study can serve as the basis for future studies on sandflies conducted in the State.
Phlebotominae, leishmaniasis, vectors, distribution, dataset
Sand flies are small dipteran insects mainly known for their role as vectors in the cycle of leishmaniasis transmission (
Many regions in Brazil possess unexplored knowledge about these insects and it is highly possible that significant diversity remains to be discovered. Expanding the existing body of knowledge on these insects is important considering the role that sandflies play in the transmission of pathogens (
The Brazilian State of Rondônia, located in the Amazon Basin, borders the States of Acre, Amazonas and Mato Grosso and shares an international frontier with Bolivia. The State has the third highest incidence of cutaneous leishmaniasis (CL) in northern Brazil, with approximately 15,000 cases registered between 2007 and 2020. According to the Brazilian Ministry of Health, this incidence rate results from intense zoonotic transmission associated with human occupation in transmission foci (
The first studies on sandflies were conducted in Rondônia in the 1960s (
Rondônia, located in the western part of the Amazon Basin, is third in terms of territorial extension amongst the States in the north of Brazil. The State covers an area of 237576 km2 and has a population of 1,815,278 inhabitants throughout its 52 municipalities; it shares borders with Bolivia and the neighbouring States of Acre, Amazonas and Mato Grosso. The local climate is tropical, with annual average temperatures varying between 19.2 and 26.6°C. The dominant vegetation is dense ombrophilous forest (Amazon tropical forest), yet Rondônia has experienced a decrease in vegetal cover over the last 40 years (
We analysed data produced by zoological collections, such as the Phlebotomine Collection - Fiocruz/COLFLEB and Invertebrates Collection/INPA. These data are freely available on speciesLink (splink.cria.org.br/), a distributed information system that combines primary data from scientific collections. We also searched the scientific literature for all studies containing taxonomic and geographic information on sand fly species collected in Rondônia. The collected information consisted of total specimens and accompanying location coordinates in decimal format (long., lat.) to construct regional maps.
Distribution maps, constructed using QGIS3.4, revealed the most abundant species across the municipalities in Rondônia, with species abundance distributed in up to five classes: (i) 1-100 individuals, (ii) 101-500 individuals, (iii) 501-1000 individuals, (iv) 1001-2000 individuals and (v) > 2001 individuals. Data on Leishmania infection in each sand fly species were also compiled to build occurrence maps of potential vectors in the State. Finally, we constructed a web server with python applications containing information on the distribution of all species recorded throughout the State’s municipalities: https://sandfliesdb.herokuapp.com/.
Cacaulândia, Porto Velho
Cacoal, Costa Marques, Itapuã do Oeste, Ji-Paraná, Machadinho d'Oeste, Pimenta Bueno, Porto Velho, Vale do Anari, Vilhena
Buritis, Cacaulândia, Campo Novo, Costa Marques, Guajará-Mirim, Itapuã do Oeste, Ji-Paraná, Monte Negro, Nova Mamoré, Porto Velho, Vale do Anari
Buritis, Cacaulândia, Campo Novo, Guajará-Mirim, Itapuã do Oeste, Ji-Paraná, Machadinho d'Oeste, Monte Negro, Nova Mamoré, Pimenta Bueno, Porto Velho, Vale do Anari
Buritis Cacaulândia Cacoal, Campo Novo, Costa Marques, Guajará-Mirim, Itapuã do Oeste, Ji-Paraná, Machadinho d'Oeste, Monte Negro, Nova Mamoré, Pimenta Bueno, Porto Velho, São Francisco do Guaporé, Vale do Anari
Porto Velho
Guajará-Mirim
Itapuã do Oeste
Guajará-Mirim, Itapuã do Oeste, Porto Velho, Vilhena
Cacaulândia, Porto Velho
A total of 153,155 records of sandflies captured in Rondônia were identified between 1965 and 2021, of which 147,258 were suitable for mapping (species link: 3,408, studies conducted in Rondônia: 143,850). In all, 5,887 reports were discarded mainly due to a lack of geographic coordinates. The remaining 147,258 records were distributed into four subtribes, 15 genera and 140 sand fly species. The subtribe with the most records was Psychodopygina Galati, 1995 with 132,138 records and 68 species, followed by Lutzomyiina Abonnenc & Leger, 1976 (12,534 records – 54 species), Sergentomyiina Galati, 2003 (2,296 records - 11 species) and Brumptomyiina Galati, 2003 (290 records - 7 species) (Table
Records of sandflies in Rondônia state obtained from scientific literature and speciesLink.
Brumptomyiina Galati, 2003 (7 species) |
N |
Brumptomyiina Galati, 2003 (7 species) |
N |
Brumptomyia avellari (Costa Lima, 1932) |
39 |
Brumptomyia mesai Sherlock, 1962 |
2 |
Brumptomyia brumpti (Larrousse, 1920) |
97 |
Brumptomyia pentacantha (Barretto, 1947) |
8 |
Brumptomyia cunhai (Mangabeira, 1942) |
4 |
Brumptomyia pintoi (Costa Lima, 1932) |
18 |
Brumptomyia travassosi (Mangabeira, 1942) |
122 |
||
Lutzomyiina Abonnenc & Leger, 1976 (54 species) |
N |
Lutzomyiina Abonnenc & Leger, 1976 (54 species) |
N |
Evandromyia andersoni (Le Pont & Desjeux, 1988) |
1 |
Lutzomyia gomezi (Nitzulescu, 1931) |
459 |
Evandromyia apurinan Shimabukuro, Figueira & Silva, 2013 |
12 |
Lutzomyia longipalpis (Lutz & Neiva, 1912) |
47 |
Evandromyia bacula (Martins, Falcão & Silva, 1965) |
307 |
Lutzomyia marinkellei Young, 1979 |
7 |
Evandromyia begonae (Ortiz & Torrez, 1975) |
12 |
Lutzomyia sherlocki Martins, Falcão & Silva, 1971 |
729 |
Evandromyia brachyphalla (Mangabeira, 1941) |
9 |
Migonemyia cerqueirai (Causey & Damasceno, 1945) |
2 |
Evandromyia carmelinoi (Ryan, Lainson, Fraiha & Shaw, 1986) |
1 |
Migonemyia migonei (França, 1920) |
331 |
Evandromyia evandroi (Costa Lima & Antunes, 1936) |
19 |
Pintomyia damascenoi (Mangabeira, 1941) |
23 |
Evandromyia georgii Freitas & Barrett, 2002 |
286 |
Pintomyia duckei Oliveira, Alencar & Freitas, 2018 |
8 |
Evandromyia infraspinosa (Mangabeira, 1941) |
263 |
Pintomyia fiocruzi Pereira Júnior, Pessoa, Marialva & Medeiros, 2019 |
34 |
Evandromyia inpai (Young & Arias, 1977) |
2 |
Pintomyia gruta (Ryan, 1986) |
12 |
Evandromyia lenti (Mangabeira, 1938) |
11 |
Pintomyia nevesi (Damasceno & Arouck, 1956) |
4140 |
Evandromyia monstruosa (Floch & Abonnenc, 1944) |
42 |
Pintomyia odax (Fairchild & Hertig, 1961) |
1 |
Evandromyia pinottii (Damasceno & Arouck, 1956) |
4 |
Pintomyia pacae (Floch & Abonnenc, 1943) |
1 |
Evandromyia piperiformis Godoy, Cunha & Galati, 2017 |
21 |
Pintomyia serrana (Damasceno & Arouck, 1949) |
308 |
Evandromyia saulensis (Floch & Abonnenc, 1944) |
467 |
Pressatia calcarata (Martins & Silva, 1964) |
15 |
Evandromyia sericea (Floch & Abonnenc, 1944) |
8 |
Pressatia choti (Floch & Abonnenc, 1941) |
89 |
Evandromyia sp. de Baduel (Floch & Abonnenc, 1945) |
1 |
Pressatia triacantha (Mangabeira, 1942) |
984 |
Evandromyia tarapacaensis (Le Pont, Torrez-Espejo & Galati, 1997) |
373 |
Pressatia trispinosa (Mangabeira, 1942) |
80 |
Evandromyia termitophila (Martins, Falcão & Silva, 1964) |
102 |
Sciopemyia fluviatilis (Flochi & Abonnenc, 1944) |
69 |
Evandromyia walkeri (Newstead, 1914) |
194 |
Sciopemyia servulolimai (Damasceno & Causey, 1945) |
123 |
Evandromyia williamsi (Damasceno, Causey & Arouck, 1945) |
22 |
Sciopemyia sordellii (Shannon & Del Ponte, 1927) |
1349 |
Evandromyia wilsoni (Damasceno & Causey, 1945) |
461 |
Sciopemyia vattierae (Le Pont & Desjeux, 1992) |
21 |
Lutzomyia caligata (Martins,Falcão & Silva, 1965) |
2 |
Trichopygomyia dasypodogeton (Castro, 1939) |
569 |
Lutzomyia carvalhoi (Damasceno, Causey & Arouck, 1945) |
23 |
Trichopygomyia longispina (Mangabeira, 1942) |
4 |
Lutzomyia evangelistai Martins & Fraiha, 1971 |
235 |
Trichopygomyia rondoniensis (Martins, Falcão & Silva, 1965) |
121 |
Lutzomyia falcata Young & Morales, 1994 |
2 |
Trichopygomyia trichopyga (Floch & Abonnenc, 1945) |
73 |
Lutzomyia flabellata Martins & Silva, 1964 |
11 |
Trichopygomyia wagleyi (Causey & Damasceno, 1945) |
45 |
Psychodopygina Galati, 1995 (68 species) |
N |
Psychodopygina Galati, 1995 (68 species) |
N |
Bichromomyia flaviscutellata (Mangabeira, 1942) |
1418 |
Psychodopygus amazonensis (Root, 1934) |
562 |
Bichromomyia inornata (Martins, Falcão & Silva, 1965) |
2 |
Psychodopygus ayrozai (Barretto & Coutinho, 1940) |
2308 |
Bichromomyia olmeca nociva (Young & Arias, 1982) |
14 |
Psychodopygus bispinosus (Fairchild & Hertig, 1951) |
352 |
Bichromomyia reducta (Feliciangeli, Ramirez Pérez & Ramirez, 1988) |
15 |
Psychodopygus carrerai (Barretto, 1946) |
11840 |
Martinsmyia waltoni (Arias, Freitas & Barrett, 1984) |
28 |
Psychodopygus chagasi (Costa Lima, 1941) |
1436 |
Nyssomyia anduzei (Rozeboom, 1942) |
219 |
Psychodopygus claustrei (Abonnenc, Léger & Fauran, 1979) |
1827 |
Nyssomyia antunesi (Coutinho, 1939) |
8847 |
Psychodopygus complexus (Mangabeira, 1941) |
2659 |
Nyssomyia delsionatali Galati & Galvis, 2012 |
36 |
Psychodopygus corossoniensis (Le Pont & Desjeux, 1978) |
652 |
Nyssomyia fraihai (Martins, Falcão & Silva, 1979) |
2504 |
Psychodopygus davisi (Root, 1934) |
43818 |
Nyssomyia richardwardi (Ready & Fraiha, 1981) |
1241 |
Psychodopygus francoisleponti (Zapata, Depaquit & León, 2012) |
1 |
Nyssomyia shawi (Fraiha, Ward & Ready, 1981) |
3400 |
Psychodopygus geniculatus (Mangabeira, 1941) |
4644 |
Nyssomyia urbinattii Galati & Galvis, 2012 |
64 |
Psychodopygus guyanensis (Floch & Abonnenc, 1941) |
3 |
Nyssomyia whitmani Antunes & Coutinho, 1939 |
12594 |
Psychodopygus hirsutus (Mangabeira, 1942) |
9676 |
Nyssomyia yulli pajoti (Abonnenc, Léger & Fauran, 1979) |
2 |
Psychodopygus lainsoni Fraiha & Ward, 1974 |
1117 |
Nyssomyia yulli yuilli (Young & Porter, 1972) |
876 |
Psychodopygus leonidasdeanei Fraiha, Ryan, Ward, Lainson & Shaw, 1986 |
474 |
Nyssomyia umbratilis (Ward & Fraiha, 1977) |
1782 |
Psychodopygus llanosmartinsi Fraiha & Ward, 1980 |
428 |
Psathyromyia abonnenci (Floch & Chassignet, 1947) |
40 |
Psychodopygus paraensis (Costa Lima, 1941) |
111 |
Psathyromyia abunaensis (Martins, Falcão & Silva, 1965) |
12 |
Psychodopygus squamiventris (Lutz & Neiva, 1912) |
30 |
Psathyromyia aragaoi (Costa Lima, 1932) |
351 |
Psychodopygus yucumensis (Le Pont, Caillard, Tibayrenc & Desjeux, 1986) |
58 |
Psathyromyia barrettoi (Mangabeira, 1942) |
41 |
Trichophoromyia auraensis (Mangabeira, 1942) |
3579 |
Psathyromyia bigeniculata (Floch & Abonnenc, 1941) |
494 |
Trichophoromyia brachypyga (Mangabeira, 1942) |
57 |
Psathyromyia brasiliensis (Costa Lima, 1932) |
14 |
Trichophoromyia castanheirai (Damasceno, Causey & Arouck, 1945) |
167 |
Psathyromyia campbelli (Damasceno, Causey & Arouck, 1945) |
142 |
Trichophoromyia clitella (Young & Pérez, 1994) |
292 |
Psathyromyia coutinhoi (Mangabeira, 1942) |
13 |
Trichophoromyia eurypyga (Martins, Falcão & Silva, 1963) |
138 |
Psathyromyia dasymera (Fairchild & Hertig, 1961) |
1 |
Trichophoromyia flochi (Abonnenc & Chassigneti, 1948) |
594 |
Psathyromyia dendrophyla (Mangabeira, 1942) |
1903 |
Trichophoromyia ininii (Floch & Abonnenc, 1943) |
9 |
Psathyromyia dreisbachi (Causey & Damasceno, 1945) |
97 |
Trichophoromyia loretonensis (Llanos, 1964) |
8 |
Psathyromyia elizabethdorvalae Brilhante, Sábio & Galati, 2017 |
21 |
Trichophoromyia melloi (Causey & Damasceno, 1945) |
762 |
Psathyromyia hermanlenti (Martins, Falcão & Silva, 1970) |
233 |
Trichophoromyia octavioi (Vargas, 1949) |
487 |
Psathyromyia inflata (Floch & Abonnenc, 1944) |
16 |
Trichophoromyia readyi (Ryan, 1986) |
29 |
Psathyromyia lutziana (Costa Lima, 1932) |
268 |
Trichophoromyia ruii (Arias & Young, 1982) |
1 |
Psathyromyia pradobarrientosi (Le Pont, Matias, Martinez & Dujardin, 2004) |
100 |
Trichophoromyia ubiquitalis (Mangabeira, 1942) |
5505 |
Psathyromyia punctigeniculata (Floch & Abonnenc, 1944) |
11 |
Viannamyia furcata (Mangabeira, 1941) |
1310 |
Psathyromyia scaffi (Damasceno & Arouck, 1956) |
38 |
Viannamyia tuberculata (Mangabeira, 1941) |
367 |
Sergentomyiina Galati, 2003 (11 species) |
N |
Sergentomyiina Galati, 2003 (11 species) |
N |
Micropygomyia acanthopharynx (Martins, Falcão & Silva, 1962) |
679 |
Micropygomyia peresi (Mangabeira, 1942) |
3 |
Micropygomyia cayennensis cayennensis (Floch & Abonnenc, 1941) |
2 |
Micropygomyia pilosa (Damasceno & Causey, 1944) |
9 |
Micropygomyia echinathopharynx Andrade Filho, Galati, Andrade & Falcão, 2004 |
1 |
Micropygomyia rorotaensis (Floch & Abonnenc, 1944) |
160 |
Micropygomyia longipennis (Barretto, 1946) |
28 |
Micropygomyia trinidadensis (Newstead, 1922) |
1133 |
Micropygomyia micropyga (Mangabeira, 1942) |
76 |
Micropygomyia villelai (Mangabeira, 1942) |
202 |
Micropygomyia oswaldoi (Mangabeira, 1942) |
3 |
Sand fly studies were conducted in 17 of the State’s 52 municipalities, with Porto Velho being the municipality with the most collection events. Considering all of the evaluated studies, the most abundant species observed were: Psychodopygus davisi (Root, 1934) (43,818 records), Nyssomyia whitmani (Antunes & Coutinho, 1939) (12,594), Psychodopygus carrerai (Barretto, 1946) (11,840), Psychodopygus hirsutus (Mangabeira, 1942) (9,676), Nyssomyia antunesi (Coutinho, 1939) (8,847), Trichophoromyia ubiquitalis (Mangabeira, 1942) (5,505), Psychodopygus geniculatus (Mangabeira, 1941) (4,644), Pintomyia nevesi (Damasceno & Arouck, 1956) (4,140), Trichophoromyia auraensis (Mangabeira, 1942) (3,579), Nyssomyia shawi (Ward, Fraiha & Ready, 1981) (3400), Psychodopygus complexus (Mangabeira, 1941) (2,659), Nyssomyia fraihai (Martins, Falcão & Silva, 1979) (2,504) and Bichromomyia flaviscutellata (Mangabeira, 1942) (1,418). These species were most commonly distributed amongst the municipalities as follows: N. whitmani (17/17), P. davisi and N. antunesi (16/17), B. flaviscutellata, P. hirsutus and T. ubiquitalis (15/17), P. nevesi, P. carrerai (13/17), N. umbratilis and P. complexus (12/17), T. auraensis (11/17), P. ayrozai (9/17) and N. fraihai (7/17) (Figs
We identified 20 records of Leishmania infection in eight sand fly species: N. antunesi, N. shawi, P. amazonensis, P. carrerai, P. chagasi, P. davisi, P. hirsutus and S. sordellii (Fig.
Reports of natural infection by Leishmania spp. in sand fly species; the blue asterisk represents Leishmania amazonensis; yellow squares represent Leishmania braziliensis and red crosses indicate Leishmania naiffi. A) Municipalities with reports of sandflies infected with the following Leishmania spp.; B) Nyssomyia antunesi; C) Nyssomyia shawi; D) Psychodopygus amazonensis; E) Psychodopygus carrerai; F) Psychodopygus chagasi; G) Psychodopygus davisi; H) Psychodopygus hirsutus; I) Sciopemyia sordellii.
This study demonstrates the high diversity and distribution of sandflies, which are found in abundance in the Amazon rainforest. Although Rondônia has experienced a decrease in vegetal cover over the last 40 years (
We observed a wide species distribution amongst the evaluated municipalities, including those with Leishmania vector potential. Interestingly, L. braziliensis has been reported as the most prevalent agent in human cases recently reported in Rondônia (
Considering species important for Leishmania transmission in the Amazon, we observed low abundance of B. flaviscutellata across the State’s municipalities compared to other species; one possibility for this may be that all studies conducted in Rondônia used light traps to capture sand fly fauna; however, studies have demonstrated that B. flaviscutellata is more effectively attracted to and captured by animal rodent bait than light (
Nyssomyia antunesi is a suspected vector of L. lindenbergi with wide distribution throughout Brazil. This species was found in 16/52 municipalities in Rondônia with differing abundance (
Nyssomyia fraihai is a species that deserves discussion. Recent revalidation (
Nyssomyia shawi was found to be in low abundance in most studies conducted in Rondônia; however, Gil et al. (2003) recorded a high abundance of this species, which is similar to two different reports in Acre State (
Nyssomyia whitmani, a species found in abundance mainly in the central region of the State, was reported in entomological surveys carried out in the Municipalities of Ariquemes, Cacaulândia and Monte Negro (
Psychodopygus ayrozai was distributed across nine municipalities, with low abundance observed in eight; higher abundance was reported in the Municipality of Itapuã do Oeste. This species is cited as a highly anthropophilic sand fly species in south-eastern Brazil, with preferential feeding activity at ground level starting at dusk, extending from approximately 1700 h - 2400 h (
Psychodopygus carrerai and P. complexus are mainly reported in well-preserved forest environments (
Psychodopygus hirsutus is widely distributed across seven South American countries (Colombia, Suriname, French Guiana, Ecuador, Peru, Bolivia and Brazil) (
Psychodopygus davisi is the species most widely distributed throughout Rondônia and most studies have reported this species in abundance—our database shows this species as present in 16 municipalities. We identified many studies detecting Leishmania infection, with this species probably being the main vector of this protozoan in the State. Natural infection was detected by PCR from females collected in the Municipality of Monte Negro, identified through sequencing as L. braziliensis (
Although Pintomyia nevesi was found to be well-distributed in Rondônia and present in 13 municipalities, no studies reported the detection of Leishmania DNA (
Trichophoromyia auraensis and T. ubiquitalis are likely Leishmania vectors in Rondônia (
Amongst all reports of species identified in Rondônia, we expostulate that some were incorrectly classified in the State: Bichromomyia inornata, Evandromyia sp. de Baduel, Micropygomyia cayennensis cayennensis (Floch & Abonnenc, 1941), N. yuilli yuilli (already cited), Pintomyia odax (Fairchild & Hertig, 1961), Psathyromyia runoides and Psathyromyia shannoni. However, further taxonomic study is required to definitively confirm this speculation.
The original description of Bichromomyia inornata, by Martins et al. (1965), is the only report of this species in the State. Distribution has been reported in Bolivia, as well as in the Brazilian States of Amazonas, Rondônia and Maranhão (
Evandromyia sp. de Baduel has only been recorded in two studies (
Psathyromyia shannoni is reportedly widely distributed throughout the Americas, yet this has been refuted by evidence of misidentification (
Other species require further taxonomic study due to the possibility of misidentification arising from morphological discrepancies, such as members of Guyanensis series: Psychodopygus corossoniensis, Psychodopygus guyanensis and Psychodopygus geniculatus. Several populations of this series collected for molecular and morphological study in Ecuador resulted in the identification of P. geniculatus, Psychodopygus luisleoni Leon, Mollinedo & Le Pont, 2009 and P. corossoniensis. Two populations were observed within P. geniculatus and one was described as a new species, Psychodopygus francoisleponti (
Lutzomyia longipalpis, the main vector of Leishmania infantum Nicolle, 1908, has rarely been reported in Rondônia, which could be explained by some factors. Many studies have demonstrated that the sylvatic distribution of this species could be restricted in accordance with its populational structure. Moreover, many studies have shown that light traps are not considered an ideal method for capturing this species, necessitating the addition of pheromones or active search to obtain higher numbers of specimens (
The information evaluated in our study permitted a wide-ranging review of accumulated reports on sand flies over many years, thus enabling the construction of a robust database with information on these insects in the State of Rondônia. Our study was limited by the exclusion of some records from the database due to the inaccurate reporting of coordinates, which may have affected the presently-described distributions of some species. Nevertheless, we believe that the maps produced by this study could serve as reference to guide future studies investigating sand fly species in Rondônia.
The author AMPJ received a scholarship from the Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior - Brasil (CAPES) - Financial code 001. JFM received a scholarship from the CNPq - Chamada 06/2019 - Bolsas de Produtividade em Pesquisa - Financial code 303252/2019-7. We also give thanks to Fundação Rondônia de Amparo ao Desenvolvimento das Ações Científicas e Tecnológicas e à Pesquisa do Estado de Rondônia (FAPERO) - Chamada 012/2016 – Diversidade Genética de Flebotomíneos no Estado de Rondônia e Avaliação dos Ciclos de Transmissão de Leishmanioses. This study was supported in part by Fiotec under PROGRAMA DE EXCELÊNCIA EM PESQUISA DA FIOCRUZ RONDÔNIA – PROEP (N 008-FIO-21-2-10).
Conceptualisation: AMPJ, JFM
Methodology: MMSR, AMPJ.
Validation: AMPJ, MMSR, JFM.
Data curation: AMPJ, MMSR, JFM.
Writing - original draft: AMPJ, MMSR, JFM.
Writing - review & editing: AMPJ, MMSR, JFM.