Biodiversity Data Journal :
Taxonomy & Inventories
|
Corresponding author: Yejie Lin (linyejie15@gmail.com), Haifeng Chen (chenhaifeng@lfnu.edu.cn)
Academic editor: Yanfeng Tong
Received: 14 Sep 2022 | Accepted: 28 Nov 2022 | Published: 06 Dec 2022
© 2022 Yejie Lin, Shuqiang Li, Xin Zhao, Zhanqi Chen, Haifeng Chen
This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Citation:
Lin Y, Li S, Zhao X, Chen Z, Chen H (2022) Two new Eresus species (Araneae, Eresidae) from Xinjiang, China. Biodiversity Data Journal 10: e94853. https://doi.org/10.3897/BDJ.10.e94853
|
|
Eresidae C. L. Koch, 1845 contains nine genera and 102 species, of which 24 species belong to Eresus Walckenaer, 1805. Four species of the family are known from China: E. granosus Simon, 1895 (Beijing), E. kollari Rossi, 1846 (Hebei), E. lishizheni Lin, Marusik & Li, 2021 (Xinjiang) and Stegodyphus tibialis (O. Pickard-Cambridge, 1869) (Yunnan).
Two new species of Eresus are described from Xinjiang, China: Eresus da Lin & Li sp. n. and E. yukuni Lin & Li sp. n. Photos and morphological descriptions of new species are given.
Asia, diagnosis, DNA barcodes, taxonomy, type
The spider family Eresidae C. L. Koch, 1845, commonly known as velvet spiders, is almost entirely limited to the Old World, with the exception of one species known from Brazil (
Chinese spider taxonomists have published a large number of papers in the 21st century, but due to the rich biodiversity of the Chinese territory, there are still many unknown species (
Morphological and ecological data
Type specimens were preserved in 80% ethanol. The spermathecae were cleared in trypsin enzyme solution to dissolve non-chitinous tissues. Specimens were examined under a LEICA M205C stereomicroscope. Photomicrographs were taken with an Olympus C7070 zoom digital camera (7.1 megapixels). Laboratory habitus photographs were taken with a Sony A7RIV digital camera, equipped with a Sony FE 90 mm Goss lens. Photos were stacked with Helicon Focus® (Version 7.6.1) or Zerene Stacker® (Version 1.04) and processed in Adobe Photoshop CC2019®.
All measurements are in millimetres (mm) and were obtained with an Olympus SZX16 stereomicroscope with a Zongyuan CCD industrial camera. Measurements of body lengths do not include the chelicerae. Eye sizes are measured as the maximum diameter from either the dorsal or frontal view. Leg measurements are given as follows: total length (femur, patella+tibia, metatarsus, tarsus). Abbreviations: ALE, anterior lateral eyes; AME, anterior median eyes; BH, basal haematodocha; C, conductor; CD, copulatory duct; E, embolus; F, fissure; FD, fertilisation duct; G, groove; L, lamella; MH, median haematodocha; PLE, posterior lateral eyes; PME, posterior median eyes; S, spermatheca; SD, sperm duct; Sh, shoulder; ST, subtegulum; T, tegulum; TT, terminal tooth. References to figures in cited papers are in lowercase (fig. or figs.) and figures in this paper are noted with an initial capital (Fig. or Figs.). The terminology used in the text and figures follows Řezáč, Pekár and Johannesen (2008) and Krejčí, Řezáč and Michalik (2015) (
Type materials are deposited in the Institute of Zoology, Chinese Academy of Sciences in Beijing (IZCAS).
Sequences of 20 Eresidae specimens were downloaded from the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) and a further two are based on both holotypes in this study. Whole genomic DNA was extracted from 2–4 legs using a TIANamp Genomic DNA kit (TIANGEN Inc., Beijing, China) following the manufacturer’s protocol. One gene fragment was amplified in 20-μl reactions: COI (~ 640 bp). Primers and PCR conditions follow Folmer et al. (1994) and Hedin et al. (2001). All sequences were analysed using BLAST and are deposited in GenBank. Sequence alignment was performed in MAFFT V.7.313. The K2P distance of Intra-specific and inter-specific nucleotide divergences were calculated in MEGA.7.0. (
Female (Holotype, IZCAS-Ar43547): Habitus as in Fig.
Epigyne (Fig.
Male. Unknown.
Females of Eresus da sp. n. are similar to those of E. kollari by a relatively gentle slope of the ocular area (Fig.
The species name is a noun in apposition derived from the Chinese pinyin “dà” (giant) and refers to the large size of this new species.
Known only from the type locality (Xinjiang, China).
The spider was found behind a clump of desert plants (Fig.
Male (Holotype, IZCAS-Ar43546): Habitus as in Figs. 2C and D. Total length: 6.48, carapace 3.35 long, 2.44 wide, 1.76 high. Abdomen 3.20 long, 2.88 wide. Carapace black with white setae; pars cephalica elevated. Eye sizes and interdistances: AME 0.09, ALE 0.13, PME 0.18, PLE 0.08, AME–AME 0.12, AME–ALE 0.78, PME–PME 0.19, PME–PLE 1.03, AME–PME 0.04, ALE–PLE 1.88. Pars cephalica with a pointed posterior margin dorsally, almost as long as wide (2.54 long, 2.83 wide). Chelicerae covered with black and few white setae. Leg I with a white ring of setae at joints, black; leg II–IV with white setae dorsally. Leg measurements: Leg I 6.54 (1.95+2.15+1.32+1.12); leg II 5.11 (1.51+1.67+1.00+0.93); leg III 4.55 (1.47+1.50+0.81+0.77); leg IV 6.12 (1.93+2.22+1.14+0.83). Abdomen dark brown, with four black spots, covered with dense white setae dorsally; ventrum with black setae, sigilla conspicuous, surrounded by black setae.
Palp (Fig.
Female. Unknown.
Male of Eresus yukuni sp. n. is similar to the E. lavrosiae Mcheidze, 1997 by having black carapace covered with short black and white setae that is almost as wide at the pars cephalica as it is at the pars thoracica (Fig.
The species is named after Mr. Kun Yu, who collected the holotype; noun (name) in the genitive case.
Known only from the type locality (Xinjiang, China).
In this paper, we studied the COI sequences for 22 Eresus specimens (Table
List of voucher information and GenBank accession numbers of 22 Eresus specimens.
Taxon |
Location |
GenBank Accession Number |
E. moravicus |
NA |
|
E. kollari |
NA |
|
E. walckenaeri |
NA |
|
E. cf. kollari |
NA |
|
E. sp. 1306 |
NA |
|
E. sp. 2 |
NA |
|
E. sp. H |
NA |
|
E. hermani |
NA |
|
E. sp. 1 |
NA |
|
E. kollari |
NA |
|
E. lavrosiae |
NA |
|
E. hermani |
NA |
|
E. kollari |
NA |
|
E. sp. D |
NA |
|
E. walckenaeri |
NA |
|
E. sp. F |
NA |
|
E. sandaliatus |
NA |
|
E. kollari |
NA |
|
E. crassitibialis |
NA |
|
E. cf. kollari |
NA |
|
E. da sp. n. |
China, Xinjiang, Changji |
|
E. yukuni sp. n. |
China, Xinjiang, Urumqi |
MH673855.1 | KX537083.1 | FJ948999.1 | FJ948998.1 | FJ948997.1 | OL352216.1 | OL352217.1 | OL352220.1 | OL352221.1 | OL352223.1 | OL352224.1 | OL352225.1 | OL352226.1 | OL352228.1 | OL352229.1 | OL352230.1 | OL352231.1 | OL352232.1 | OL352233.1 | OL352235.1 | E. da sp. n. | E. yukuni sp. n. | |
MH673855.1 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
KX537083.1 | 0.050 | |||||||||||||||||||||
FJ948999.1 | 0.100 | 0.102 | ||||||||||||||||||||
FJ948998.1 | 0.090 | 0.093 | 0.101 | |||||||||||||||||||
FJ948997.1 | 0.114 | 0.125 | 0.111 | 0.118 | ||||||||||||||||||
OL352216.1 | 0.043 | 0.055 | 0.120 | 0.087 | 0.116 | |||||||||||||||||
OL352217.1 | 0.041 | 0.033 | 0.096 | 0.095 | 0.114 | 0.046 | ||||||||||||||||
OL352220.1 | 0.051 | 0.050 | 0.114 | 0.079 | 0.105 | 0.023 | 0.048 | |||||||||||||||
OL352221.1 | 0.089 | 0.084 | 0.126 | 0.102 | 0.134 | 0.085 | 0.089 | 0.081 | ||||||||||||||
OL352223.1 | 0.045 | 0.006 | 0.105 | 0.093 | 0.125 | 0.055 | 0.035 | 0.050 | 0.084 | |||||||||||||
OL352224.1 | 0.069 | 0.061 | 0.103 | 0.095 | 0.122 | 0.068 | 0.065 | 0.072 | 0.084 | 0.069 | ||||||||||||
OL352225.1 | 0.053 | 0.053 | 0.115 | 0.084 | 0.113 | 0.023 | 0.048 | 0.006 | 0.082 | 0.053 | 0.072 | |||||||||||
OL352226.1 | 0.050 | 0.008 | 0.097 | 0.082 | 0.127 | 0.053 | 0.035 | 0.048 | 0.078 | 0.011 | 0.067 | 0.052 | ||||||||||
OL352228.1 | 0.078 | 0.077 | 0.117 | 0.063 | 0.133 | 0.074 | 0.082 | 0.072 | 0.091 | 0.073 | 0.083 | 0.076 | 0.071 | |||||||||
OL352229.1 | 0.010 | 0.111 | 0.032 | 0.101 | 0.113 | 0.108 | 0.105 | 0.105 | 0.131 | 0.106 | 0.108 | 0.106 | 0.109 | 0.118 | ||||||||
OL352230.1 | 0.057 | 0.057 | 0.110 | 0.010 | 0.130 | 0.020 | 0.055 | 0.025 | 0.094 | 0.057 | 0.077 | 0.025 | 0.059 | 0.087 | 0.099 | |||||||
OL352231.1 | 0.055 | 0.055 | 0.116 | 0.087 | 0.117 | 0.027 | 0.053 | 0.019 | 0.089 | 0.055 | 0.083 | 0.019 | 0.053 | 0.076 | 0.101 | 0.028 | ||||||
OL352232.1 | 0.045 | 0.005 | 0.102 | 0.090 | 0.122 | 0.055 | 0.035 | 0.050 | 0.084 | 0.002 | 0.069 | 0.053 | 0.001 | 0.073 | 0.106 | 0.057 | 0.055 | |||||
OL352233.1 | 0.133 | 0.122 | 0.130 | 0.111 | 0.145 | 0.129 | 0.120 | 0.126 | 0.134 | 0.120 | 0.134 | 0.127 | 0.116 | 0.133 | 0.124 | 0.137 | 0.131 | 0.118 | ||||
OL352235.1 | 0.072 | 0.067 | 0.103 | 0.092 | 0.108 | 0.077 | 0.070 | 0.077 | 0.085 | 0.069 | 0.062 | 0.074 | 0.066 | 0.080 | 0.113 | 0.079 | 0.077 | 0.067 | 0.113 | |||
E. da sp. n. | 0.075 | 0.081 | 0.108 | 0.077 | 0.131 | 0.082 | 0.083 | 0.082 | 0.096 | 0.083 | 0.086 | 0.082 | 0.076 | 0.088 | 0.103 | 0.096 | 0.086 | 0.081 | 0.118 | 0.075 | ||
E. yukuni sp. n. | 0.083 | 0.091 | 0.100 | 0.095 | 0.116 | 0.096 | 0.085 | 0.090 | 0.106 | 0.091 | 0.070 | 0.091 | 0.091 | 0.086 | 0.108 | 0.097 | 0.095 | 0.091 | 0.131 | 0.061 | 0.087 |
The manuscript benefited greatly from comments by Yanfeng Tong (China), Tamas Szűts (Hungary), Milan Řezáč (Czech) and one anonymous reviewer. Danni Sherwood (UK) checked English. Yiming Zhang, Ying Lu and Chang Chu (all IZCAS, China) helped in lab work. Kun Yu, Ming Yi, Jingxin Liu, Chu Jiang and Bailu Chen (all China) helped in collection. This research was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC-31972869) and Hundred Talents Program (2022000040) of the Chinese Academy of Sciences.