Biodiversity Data Journal : Taxonomy & Inventories
PDF
Taxonomy & Inventories
Two new Eresus species (Araneae, Eresidae) from Xinjiang, China
expand article infoYejie Lin, Shuqiang Li§, Xin Zhao|, Zhanqi Chen|, Haifeng Chen
‡ Hebei Key Laboratory of Animal Diversity, College of Life Science, Langfang Normal University, Langfang, China
§ Institute of Zoology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China
| CAS Key Laboratory of Tropical Forest Ecology, Xishuangbanna Tropical Botanical Garden, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Mengla, China
Open Access

Abstract

Background

Eresidae C. L. Koch, 1845 contains nine genera and 102 species, of which 24 species belong to Eresus Walckenaer, 1805. Four species of the family are known from China: E. granosus Simon, 1895 (Beijing), E. kollari Rossi, 1846 (Hebei), E. lishizheni Lin, Marusik & Li, 2021 (Xinjiang) and Stegodyphus tibialis (O. Pickard-Cambridge, 1869) (Yunnan).

New information

Two new species of Eresus are described from Xinjiang, China: Eresus da Lin & Li sp. n. and E. yukuni Lin & Li sp. n. Photos and morphological descriptions of new species are given.

Keywords

Asia, diagnosis, DNA barcodes, taxonomy, type

Introduction

The spider family Eresidae C. L. Koch, 1845, commonly known as velvet spiders, is almost entirely limited to the Old World, with the exception of one species known from Brazil (World Spider Catalog 2022). Eresus Walckenaer 1805 are distributed in the Palaearctic and live in dry areas with short vegetation and well-drained soil. Eresus spiders are attracting public attention due to their striking colours. They are listed as a protected species, such as E. sandaliatus (Martini & Goeze, 1778) in the United Kingdom and Eresus spp. in Poland (Milano et al. 2021).

Chinese spider taxonomists have published a large number of papers in the 21st century, but due to the rich biodiversity of the Chinese territory, there are still many unknown species (Li et al. 2021, Lin et al. 2021, Li 2020, Yao et al. 2021, Zhao et al. 2022). In the current paper, we describe two new Eresus species from Xinjiang, China: E. da sp. n. and E. yukuni sp. n.

Materials and methods

Morphological and ecological data

Type specimens were preserved in 80% ethanol. The spermathecae were cleared in trypsin enzyme solution to dissolve non-chitinous tissues. Specimens were examined under a LEICA M205C stereomicroscope. Photomicrographs were taken with an Olympus C7070 zoom digital camera (7.1 megapixels). Laboratory habitus photographs were taken with a Sony A7RIV digital camera, equipped with a Sony FE 90 mm Goss lens. Photos were stacked with Helicon Focus® (Version 7.6.1) or Zerene Stacker® (Version 1.04) and processed in Adobe Photoshop CC2019®.

All measurements are in millimetres (mm) and were obtained with an Olympus SZX16 stereomicroscope with a Zongyuan CCD industrial camera. Measurements of body lengths do not include the chelicerae. Eye sizes are measured as the maximum diameter from either the dorsal or frontal view. Leg measurements are given as follows: total length (femur, patella+tibia, metatarsus, tarsus). Abbreviations: ALE, anterior lateral eyes; AME, anterior median eyes; BH, basal haematodocha; C, conductor; CD, copulatory duct; E, embolus; F, fissure; FD, fertilisation duct; G, groove; L, lamella; MH, median haematodocha; PLE, posterior lateral eyes; PME, posterior median eyes; S, spermatheca; SD, sperm duct; Sh, shoulder; ST, subtegulum; T, tegulum; TT, terminal tooth. References to figures in cited papers are in lowercase (fig. or figs.) and figures in this paper are noted with an initial capital (Fig. or Figs.). The terminology used in the text and figures follows Řezáč, Pekár and Johannesen (2008) and Krejčí, Řezáč and Michalik (2015) (Řezáč et al. 2008, Krejčí et al. 2015).

Type materials are deposited in the Institute of Zoology, Chinese Academy of Sciences in Beijing (IZCAS).

Sequences of 20 Eresidae specimens were downloaded from the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) and a further two are based on both holotypes in this study. Whole genomic DNA was extracted from 2–4 legs using a TIANamp Genomic DNA kit (TIANGEN Inc., Beijing, China) following the manufacturer’s protocol. One gene fragment was amplified in 20-μl reactions: COI (~ 640 bp). Primers and PCR conditions follow Folmer et al. (1994) and Hedin et al. (2001). All sequences were analysed using BLAST and are deposited in GenBank. Sequence alignment was performed in MAFFT V.7.313. The K2P distance of Intra-specific and inter-specific nucleotide divergences were calculated in MEGA.7.0. (Folmer et al. 1994, Hedin and Madison 2001, Kumar et al. 2016).

Taxon treatments

Eresus da Lin & Li, sp. n.

Material   Download as CSV 
Holotype:
  1. scientificName:
    Eresus da Lin & Li, sp. n.
    ; taxonID:
    urn:lsid:zoobank.org:act:A52C7C88-A951-4E80-8B28-751DDF692327
    ; kingdom:
    Animalia
    ; phylum:
    Arthropoda
    ; class:
    Arachnida
    ; order:
    Araneae
    ; family:
    Eresidae
    ; genus:
    Eresus
    ; country:
    China
    ; stateProvince:
    Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region
    ; county:
    Changji Hui Autonomous Prefecture
    ; municipality:
    Fukang City
    ; locality:
    Wutonggou National Desert Park
    ; verbatimElevation:
    388 m
    ; decimalLatitude:
    44.3920
    ; decimalLongitude:
    87.8707
    ; year:
    2022
    ; month:
    7
    ; day:
    25
    ; individualID:
    IZCAS-Ar43547
    ; sex:
    female
    ; recordedBy:
    Xin Zhao
    ; identifiedBy:
    Yejie Lin
    ; occurrenceID:
    9B247645-5769-574E-9924-00D870022C35

Description

Female (Holotype, IZCAS-Ar43547): Habitus as in Fig. 2A and B. Carapace 10.88 long, 8.62 wide, 8.92 high. Carapace nearly equally wide at pars cephalica and pars thoracica. Carapace red-brown with white setae; pars cephalica elevated. Eye sizes and interdistances: AME 0.21, ALE 0.26, PME 0.51, PLE 0.33, AME–AME 0.37, AME–ALE 3.56, PME–PME 0.65, PME–PLE 2.52, AME–PME 0.11. Pars cephalica with a pointed posterior margin dorsally, almost as long as wide. Chelicerae covered with narrowed white and black setae. Legs with a white ring of setae at joints. Legs with ventral macrosetae on Ta, Mt and Ti I–IV. Leg measurements: I: 17.83 (5.17+5.90+3.94+2.82); II: 16.46 (5.54+5.89+2.94+2.09); III: 14.77 (4.80+5.68+2.63+1.66); IV: 19.53 (6.33+7.29+3.74+2.17). Abdomen dark brown, covered with black setae, with white spots, sigilla conspicuous, surrounded by white setae.

Figure 1.  

Eresus da sp. n. holotype female. A habitat; B microhabitat; C tunnel wrapped with beetle skeleton; D beetle skeleton (Pimeliinae sp.); E spider with nest.

Figure 2.  

Eresus da sp. n. holotype female (A, B) and E. yukuni sp. n. holotype male (C, D), habitus. A, C dorsal view; B, D lateral view.

Epigyne (Fig. 3) with sclerotised margins, longer than high. Middle plant beyond posterior edge of epigyne margin. Fissure bow-shaped. Copulatory duct translucent, with spermathecal epithelium on anterior edge. Spermathecae distinctly lobed, reaching further laterally than copulatory ducts.

Figure 3.  

Eresus da sp. n. holotype female A epigyne, ventral view; B vulva, dorsal view.

Male. Unknown.

Diagnosis

Females of Eresus da sp. n. are similar to those of E. kollari by a relatively gentle slope of the ocular area (Fig. 2C and D; Řezáč et al. 2008, fig. 4D; Miller et al. 2012, fig. 2F) and with the epigynal area longer than high (Fig. 3A; Řezáč et al. 2008, figs. 2A–J). This species can be distinguished from E. kollari by the abdomen with a large number of white spots (Fig. 2D) (vs. abdomen uniformly black in E. kollari), the anterior edge of copulatory duct within the anterior edge of epigyne (vs. beyond the anterior edge of epigyne in E. kollari) and the ventral of fissure curved (vs. almost straight in E. kollari) (Fig. 4).

Figure 4.  

Eresus spp., outlines of copulatory organs (green line, Eresus da sp. n.; red line, E. kollari, changed after Řezáč et al. (2008). A epigyne, ventral view; B vulva, dorsal view.

Etymology

The species name is a noun in apposition derived from the Chinese pinyin “dà” (giant) and refers to the large size of this new species.

Distribution

Known only from the type locality (Xinjiang, China).

Ecology

The spider was found behind a clump of desert plants (Fig. 1A). The spider habitat is under the ground, with a silk tunnel (around 20 cm in length) connecting its opening and underground nest (Fig. 1A and B). This underground living strategy may be an adaptive strategy for escaping from the sunlight heating and extremely high temperature of the ground surface. As the silken tunnel was wrapped with dozens of empty beetle exoskeletons (Fig. 1C and D), we assume that the desert-living beetles are the main diet of the spider, which has a thick fang to pierce the beetles while feeding. In addition, the small size of the spider’s eyes suggest that the spider may adopt a sit-and-wait hunting strategy and that it does not rely on visual signals for hunting.

Eresus yukuni Lin & Li, sp. n.

Material   Download as CSV 
Holotype:
  1. scientificName:
    Eresus yukuni Lin & Li, sp. n.
    ; taxonID:
    urn:lsid:zoobank.org:act:95651052-1B7C-47FE-8E6E-1D6D20E51B0A
    ; kingdom:
    Animalia
    ; phylum:
    Arthropoda
    ; class:
    Arachnida
    ; order:
    Araneae
    ; family:
    Eresidae
    ; genus:
    Eresus
    ; country:
    China
    ; stateProvince:
    Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region
    ; municipality:
    Urumqi City
    ; locality:
    Saybag District, near Shihuoshan Tunnel
    ; decimalLatitude:
    43.7947
    ; decimalLongitude:
    87.4783
    ; year:
    2019
    ; month:
    6
    ; day:
    24
    ; individualID:
    IZCAS-Ar43546
    ; recordedBy:
    Kun Yu
    ; identifiedBy:
    Kun Yu
    ; occurrenceID:
    F2E880E4-6CA6-5E5A-929E-63D1B3CE4703

Description

Male (Holotype, IZCAS-Ar43546): Habitus as in Figs. 2C and D. Total length: 6.48, carapace 3.35 long, 2.44 wide, 1.76 high. Abdomen 3.20 long, 2.88 wide. Carapace black with white setae; pars cephalica elevated. Eye sizes and interdistances: AME 0.09, ALE 0.13, PME 0.18, PLE 0.08, AME–AME 0.12, AME–ALE 0.78, PME–PME 0.19, PME–PLE 1.03, AME–PME 0.04, ALE–PLE 1.88. Pars cephalica with a pointed posterior margin dorsally, almost as long as wide (2.54 long, 2.83 wide). Chelicerae covered with black and few white setae. Leg I with a white ring of setae at joints, black; leg II–IV with white setae dorsally. Leg measurements: Leg I 6.54 (1.95+2.15+1.32+1.12); leg II 5.11 (1.51+1.67+1.00+0.93); leg III 4.55 (1.47+1.50+0.81+0.77); leg IV 6.12 (1.93+2.22+1.14+0.83). Abdomen dark brown, with four black spots, covered with dense white setae dorsally; ventrum with black setae, sigilla conspicuous, surrounded by black setae.

Palp (Fig. 5). Tegulum round. Conductor height is greater than width, with a slight shoulder and curved terminal tooth; the height of the lamella is almost twice the length of terminal tooth; groove deep and narrow.

Figure 5.  

Eresus yukuni sp. n., holotype, right palp (Horizontal flip). A conductor, prolateral view; B same, ventral view; C same, retrolateral view; D palp, prolateral view; E same, retrolateral view.

Female. Unknown.

Diagnosis

Male of Eresus yukuni sp. n. is similar to the E. lavrosiae Mcheidze, 1997 by having black carapace covered with short black and white setae that is almost as wide at the pars cephalica as it is at the pars thoracica (Fig. 2A and B; Zamani et al. 2020, fig. 15). However, this species can be distinguished from E. lavrosiae by the abdomen with dense white setae dorsally (Fig. 2A) [vs. with a frontally abrupt white circle in E. lavrosiae (Zamani et al. 2020, fig. 15)]. The palps are similar to those of E. lavrosiae by the strongly curved terminal tooth and the conspicuously deep lamellar groove, but can be distinguished by the shoulder near the base of the embolus in retrolateral view (Fig. 5B) (vs. shoulder far from the base of the embolus in E. lavrosiae (Zamani et al. 2020, fig. 19) and the conductor higher than wide in ventral view (Fig. 5C) [vs. wider than high in E. lavrosiae (Zamani et al. 2020, fig. 18)].

Etymology

The species is named after Mr. Kun Yu, who collected the holotype; noun (name) in the genitive case.

Distribution

Known only from the type locality (Xinjiang, China).

Analysis

In this paper, we studied the COI sequences for 22 Eresus specimens (Table 1). Calculation of the K2P distance using MEGA.7.0, revealed that the new species had a significant genetic gap with other known species (Table 2). The interspecific genetic distance ranged from 4.5% to 14.5%, as shown in Table 2. Based on the 632 bp-aligned sequences, the COI uncorrected K2P-distance between Eresus da sp. n. and E. kollari is 7.3%, between E. da sp. n. and E. moravicus Řezáč, 2008 is 6.6% and between Eresus da sp. n. and E. yukuni sp. n. is 8.7%. The result exceeded the maximum value of intraspecific genetic distance for Eresidae.

Table 1.

List of voucher information and GenBank accession numbers of 22 Eresus specimens.

Taxon

Location

GenBank Accession Number

E. moravicus

NA

MH673855.1

E. kollari

NA

KX537083.1

E. walckenaeri

NA

FJ948999.1

E. cf. kollari

NA

FJ948998.1

E. sp. 1306

NA

FJ948997.1

E. sp. 2

NA

OL352216.1

E. sp. H

NA

OL352217.1

E. hermani

NA

OL352220.1

E. sp. 1

NA

OL352221.1

E. kollari

NA

OL352223.1

E. lavrosiae

NA

OL352224.1

E. hermani

NA

OL352225.1

E. kollari

NA

OL352226.1

E. sp. D

NA

OL352228.1

E. walckenaeri

NA

OL352229.1

E. sp. F

NA

OL352230.1

E. sandaliatus

NA

OL352231.1

E. kollari

NA

OL352232.1

E. crassitibialis

NA

OL352233.1

E. cf. kollari

NA

OL352235.1

E. da sp. n.

China, Xinjiang, Changji

OP376824

E. yukuni sp. n.

China, Xinjiang, Urumqi

OP434393

Table 2.

Estimates of evolutionary divergence between Eresus spp.

MH673855.1 KX537083.1 FJ948999.1 FJ948998.1 FJ948997.1 OL352216.1 OL352217.1 OL352220.1 OL352221.1 OL352223.1 OL352224.1 OL352225.1 OL352226.1 OL352228.1 OL352229.1 OL352230.1 OL352231.1 OL352232.1 OL352233.1 OL352235.1 E. da sp. n. E. yukuni sp. n.
MH673855.1
KX537083.1 0.050
FJ948999.1 0.100 0.102
FJ948998.1 0.090 0.093 0.101
FJ948997.1 0.114 0.125 0.111 0.118
OL352216.1 0.043 0.055 0.120 0.087 0.116
OL352217.1 0.041 0.033 0.096 0.095 0.114 0.046
OL352220.1 0.051 0.050 0.114 0.079 0.105 0.023 0.048
OL352221.1 0.089 0.084 0.126 0.102 0.134 0.085 0.089 0.081
OL352223.1 0.045 0.006 0.105 0.093 0.125 0.055 0.035 0.050 0.084
OL352224.1 0.069 0.061 0.103 0.095 0.122 0.068 0.065 0.072 0.084 0.069
OL352225.1 0.053 0.053 0.115 0.084 0.113 0.023 0.048 0.006 0.082 0.053 0.072
OL352226.1 0.050 0.008 0.097 0.082 0.127 0.053 0.035 0.048 0.078 0.011 0.067 0.052
OL352228.1 0.078 0.077 0.117 0.063 0.133 0.074 0.082 0.072 0.091 0.073 0.083 0.076 0.071
OL352229.1 0.010 0.111 0.032 0.101 0.113 0.108 0.105 0.105 0.131 0.106 0.108 0.106 0.109 0.118
OL352230.1 0.057 0.057 0.110 0.010 0.130 0.020 0.055 0.025 0.094 0.057 0.077 0.025 0.059 0.087 0.099
OL352231.1 0.055 0.055 0.116 0.087 0.117 0.027 0.053 0.019 0.089 0.055 0.083 0.019 0.053 0.076 0.101 0.028
OL352232.1 0.045 0.005 0.102 0.090 0.122 0.055 0.035 0.050 0.084 0.002 0.069 0.053 0.001 0.073 0.106 0.057 0.055
OL352233.1 0.133 0.122 0.130 0.111 0.145 0.129 0.120 0.126 0.134 0.120 0.134 0.127 0.116 0.133 0.124 0.137 0.131 0.118
OL352235.1 0.072 0.067 0.103 0.092 0.108 0.077 0.070 0.077 0.085 0.069 0.062 0.074 0.066 0.080 0.113 0.079 0.077 0.067 0.113
E. da sp. n. 0.075 0.081 0.108 0.077 0.131 0.082 0.083 0.082 0.096 0.083 0.086 0.082 0.076 0.088 0.103 0.096 0.086 0.081 0.118 0.075
E. yukuni sp. n. 0.083 0.091 0.100 0.095 0.116 0.096 0.085 0.090 0.106 0.091 0.070 0.091 0.091 0.086 0.108 0.097 0.095 0.091 0.131 0.061 0.087

Acknowledgements

The manuscript benefited greatly from comments by Yanfeng Tong (China), Tamas Szűts (Hungary), Milan Řezáč (Czech) and one anonymous reviewer. Danni Sherwood (UK) checked English. Yiming Zhang, Ying Lu and Chang Chu (all IZCAS, China) helped in lab work. Kun Yu, Ming Yi, Jingxin Liu, Chu Jiang and Bailu Chen (all China) helped in collection. This research was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC-31972869) and Hundred Talents Program (2022000040) of the Chinese Academy of Sciences.

References

login to comment