Biodiversity Data Journal : Taxonomy & Inventories
PDF
Taxonomy & Inventories
A new species of Chilobrachys (Araneae, Theraphosidae) from Guangdong, China
expand article infoYe-Jie Lin, Shuqiang Li§, Chunyan Xie
‡ Hebei Key Laboratory of Animal Diversity, College of Life Science, Langfang Normal University, Langfang, China
§ Institute of Zoology, Chinese Academy of sciences, Beijing, China
Open Access

Abstract

Background

The theraphosid spider genus Chilobrachys Karsch, 1892 contains 30 species, almost entirely limited to Indochina, India, Sri Lanka and China. Six species of Chilobrachys are currently known from China: C. dominus Lin & Li, 2022 (Yunnan), C. guangxiensis (Yin & Tan, 2000) (Guangxi, Hainan), C. hubei Song & Zhao, 1988 (Hubei, Chongqing), C. jinchengi Lin & Li, 2022 (Tibet), C. liboensis Zhu & Zhang, 2008 (Guizhou, Guangxi) and C. lubricus Yu et al., 2021 (Yunnan).

New information

A new species, Chilobrachys qishuoi Lin & Li, sp. n., is described from Guangdong, China, on the basis of both sexes. This is the easternmost Chilobrachys species known. Photos and a morphological description of the new species are provided. Type materials are deposited in the Institute of Zoology, Chinese Academy of Sciences (IZCAS) in Beijing, China.

Introduction

The spider family Theraphosidae Thorell, 1869, commonly known as tarantulas, currently comprises 1041 species in 156 genera, of which Chilobrachys Karsch, 1892 contains 30 species, almost entirely limited to Indochina, India, Sri Lanka and China (Li 2020, Li et al. 2021, Yao et al. 2021, Zhao et al. 2022). Although this genus contains a relatively large number of species, 12 species are described from one sex and few historical species have been restudied. Six valid Chilobrachys species are currently known from China: C. dominus Lin & Li, 2022 (Yunnan), C. guangxiensis (Yin & Tan, 2000) (Guangxi, Hainan), C. hubei Song & Zhao, 1988 (Hubei, Chongqing), C. jinchengi Lin & Li, 2022 (Tibet), C. liboensis Zhu & Zhang, 2008 (Guizhou, Guangxi) and C. lubricus Yu et al., 2021 (Yunnan). One previous species from China, C. tschankhoensis Schenkel, 1963 was made a nomen dubium by Sherwood & Gabriel (2020) (Schenkel 1963, Zhu and Zhang 2008, Sherwood and Gabriel 2020, Yu et al. 2021, Lin et al. 2022, World Spider Catalog 2022).

The most distinctive feature of this genus is the basal, ventrally standing knife-like strikers on the chelicerae and a single or double row of paddle hairs (lyra) overlapped by a fringe of lesser stridulating setae on the maxillae (Raven 1985, Zhu and Zhang 2008). Previous researchers have often overlooked the morphological characteristics of the stridulatory setae of species within the same genus. The terminal structure of embolus also has an important role in species identification.

Here, we describe a new species: Chilobrachys qishuoi sp. n. from Qingyuan, Guangdong. It is the easternmost Chilobrachys species known.

Materials and methods

All specimens were preserved in 75% ethanol and the type specimens of Chilobrachys qishuoi sp. n. were deposited in the Institute of Zoology, Chinese Academy of Sciences in Beijing (IZCAS). Spermathecae were cleared in trypsin enzyme solution to dissolve non-chitinous tissues. Specimens were examined using a LEICA M205C stereomicroscope. Photomicroscopy images were taken with an Olympus C7070 zoom digital camera (7.1 megapixels). Laboratory habitus photographs were taken with a Sony A7RIV digital camera equipped with a Sony FE 90 mm Goss lens. Photos were stacked with Helicon Focus (v. 7.6.1) or Zerene Stacker (v. 1.04) and processed in Adobe Photoshop CC2022.

All measurements are in millimetres and were obtained with an Olympus SZX16 stereomicroscope with a Zongyuan CCD industrial camera. Body length was measured without chelicerae. Eye sizes were measured as the maximum diameter from either the dorsal or frontal view. The largest stridulatory seta was selected as the sample. The length of the contraction area is defined as the length from the position on the stalks that is as wide as the spermathecal lobe to the neck. The length of the spermathecal lobe is defined as the length from the neck to the terminal of the spermathecal lobe. The length of stalks is defined as the length from the neck to the end of the receptacles. Leg measurements are given as follows: total length (femur, patella, tibia, metatarsus, tarsus). The terminology used in the text and figures follows Gabriel and Sherwood (2020).

A total of 366 bases of cytochrome oxidase I were sequenced by using the following primers: ExtA (5’-GAAGTTTATATTTTAATTTTACCTGG-3’) and ExtB (5’-CCTATTGAWARAACATARTGAAAATG-3’). This PCR profile consisted of an initial denaturing step at 94°C for 2 min, 30 amplification cycles [94°C for 30 s, 50°C or optimal annealing temperature (Tm°C) for 45 s, 72°C for 45 s], followed by a final extension step at 72°C for 5 min.

Materials from the following institutions were examined or had images of type material supplied to the authors: IZCAS Institute of Zoology, Chinese Academy of Sciences; MHBU Museum of Hebei University.

Abbreviations: A apical keel; ALE anterior lateral eyes; AME anterior median eyes; BRV base to receptacle value; BSE base separation extent; CA contraction area; EO embolic opening; LBW lobe to base width; LRV lobe to receptacle value; LSE lobe separation extent; MOA median ocular area; NBW neck to base width; NLW neck to lobe width; PI prolateral inferior keel; PLE posterior lateral eyes; PLS posterior lateral spinneret; PME posterior median eyes; PMS posterior median spinneret; PS prolateral superior keel; SL spermathecal lobes; St stalks; TA tegular apophysis.

Comparative material examined

Chilobrachys dominus Lin & Li, 2022, holotype male, Ar42676, China, Ynnnan, Jinghong, IZCAS.

Chilobrachys guangxiensis (Yin & Tan, 2000), 2 males, without institution ID, China, Guangxi, Longzhou; 1 female, without institution ID, China, Hainan, Sanya, IZCAS.

Chilobrachys hubei Song & Zhao, 1988, 1 male, 1 female, without institution ID, China, Hubei, Badong (type locality), MHBU.

Chilobrachys jinchengi Lin & Li, 2022, holotype male, paratype male, Ar42677, Ar42678, respectively, China, Tibet, Medog, IZCAS.

Chilobrachys liboensis Zhu & Zhang, 2008, 1 male, without institution ID, China, Guizhou, Libo (type locality), IZCAS.

Chilobrachys lubricus Yu, Zhang, Zhang, Li & Yang, 2021, holotype male, one paratype female, without institution ID, China, Yunnan, Yuxi, MHBU.

Taxon treatment

Chilobrachys qishuoi Lin & Li, 2022, sp. n.

Materials   Download as CSV 
Holotype:
  1. country:
    China
    ; stateProvince:
    Guangdong
    ; municipality:
    Qingyuan City
    ; locality:
    Qingxin District, X366 Road, near Jingdong
    ; verbatimElevation:
    313 m
    ; verbatimCoordinates:
    N24.2320°, E112.8048°
    ; year:
    2022
    ; month:
    9
    ; day:
    17–22
    ; sex:
    male
    ; recordedBy:
    Shuo Qi and Jincheng Liu
    ; identifiedBy:
    Yejie Lin
    ; institutionID:
    IZCAS-Ar43549
    ; occurrenceID:
    E239F997-4C70-59CD-9731-D57BF718D5CC
Paratypes:
  1. country:
    China
    ; stateProvince:
    Guangdong
    ; municipality:
    Qingyuan City
    ; locality:
    Qingxin District, X366 Road, near Jingdong
    ; verbatimElevation:
    313 m
    ; verbatimCoordinates:
    N24.2320°, E112.8048°
    ; year:
    2022
    ; month:
    9
    ; day:
    17–22
    ; sex:
    male
    ; recordedBy:
    Shuo Qi and Jincheng Liu
    ; identifiedBy:
    Yejie Lin
    ; institutionID:
    IZCAS-Ar43550
    ; occurrenceID:
    B011EB7C-D71C-58FF-9649-488522763C14
  2. country:
    China
    ; stateProvince:
    Guangdong
    ; municipality:
    Qingyuan City
    ; locality:
    Qingxin District, X366 Road, near Jingdong
    ; verbatimElevation:
    313 m
    ; verbatimCoordinates:
    N24.2320°, E112.8048°
    ; year:
    2022
    ; month:
    9
    ; day:
    17–22
    ; sex:
    male
    ; recordedBy:
    Shuo Qi and Jincheng Liu
    ; identifiedBy:
    Yejie Lin
    ; institutionID:
    IZCAS-Ar43551
    ; occurrenceID:
    B011EB7C-D71C-58FF-9649-488522763C14
  3. country:
    China
    ; stateProvince:
    Guangdong
    ; municipality:
    Qingyuan City
    ; locality:
    Qingxin District, X366 Road, near Jingdong
    ; verbatimElevation:
    313 m
    ; verbatimCoordinates:
    N24.2320°, E112.8048°
    ; year:
    2022
    ; month:
    8
    ; day:
    20
    ; sex:
    female
    ; recordedBy:
    Shuo Qi
    ; identifiedBy:
    Yejie Lin
    ; institutionID:
    IZCAS-Ar43552
    ; occurrenceID:
    B011EB7C-D71C-58FF-9649-488522763C14
  4. country:
    China
    ; stateProvince:
    Guangdong
    ; municipality:
    Qingyuan City
    ; locality:
    Qingxin District, X366 Road, near Jingdong
    ; verbatimElevation:
    313 m
    ; verbatimCoordinates:
    N24.2320°, E112.8048°
    ; year:
    2022
    ; month:
    9
    ; day:
    17–22
    ; sex:
    female
    ; recordedBy:
    Shuo Qi and Jincheng Liu
    ; identifiedBy:
    Yejie Lin
    ; institutionID:
    IZCAS-Ar43553
    ; occurrenceID:
    B011EB7C-D71C-58FF-9649-488522763C14

Description

Male (holotype, IZCAS-Ar43549) (Fig. 2A, Fig. 3, Fig. 5, Fig. 6A, B and Fig. 7A).

Figure 1.  

Chilobrachys qishuoi sp. n., live. A juveniles in burrow; B habitat in the type locality; C subadult, in situ. Photos by Shuo Qi (A, B) and Yongyou Zhao (C).

Figure 2.  

Chilobrachys qishuoi sp. n., A holotype male; B paratype female (Ar43552), live. Photos by Shuo Qi.

Figure 3.  

Chilobrachys qishuoi sp. n., holotype male A habitus, dorsal; B ocular tubercle; C left maxilla; D sternum; E stridulatory lyra, lateral view; F same, ventral view; G chelicera, retrolateral view; H same, prolateral view.

Figure 4.  

Chilobrachys qishuoi sp. n., paratype female (Ar43552) A habitus, dorsal; B ocular tubercle; C left maxilla; D sternum; E stridulatory lyra, lateral view; F same, ventral view; G chelicera, retrolateral view; H same, prolateral view.

Figure 5.  

Chilobrachys qishuoi sp. n., holotype, male left palp. A prolateral view; B ventral view; C retrolateral view.

Figure 6.  

Chilobrachys qishuoi sp. n., right palp bulb, rotated horizontally A, C retrolateral view; B prolateral view. Abbreviations: A apical keel; PI prolateral inferior keel; PS prolateral superior keel; TA tegular apophysis.

Figure 7.  

Chilobrachys qishuoi sp. n., tip of embolus. Abbreviations: A apical keel; EO embolic opening; PI prolateral inferior keel; PS prolateral superior keel.

Figure 8.

Tip of embolus of Chilobrachys species in China. Abbreviations: A apical keel; EO embolic opening; PI prolateral inferior keel; PS prolateral superior keel.

aC. dominus, holotype  
bC. guangxiensis from Longzhou, Guangxi  
cC. hubei from Badong, Hubei (type locality)  
dC. jinchengi, holotype  
eC. liboensis from Libo, Guizhou (type locality)  
fC. lubricus, holotype  

Colouration in alcohol: Carapace, palp and legs red brown. Chelicerae and abdomen black (Fig. 3A).

Carapace 11.27 long, 9.82 wide, with long white setae. Eye group 2.02 long, 0.91 wide. MOA 1.24 long, anterior width 0.96, posterior width 1.24 (Fig. 3B). Eye sizes and interdistances: ALE 0.47, AME 0.42, PLE 0.38, PME 0.38; ALE–AME 0.11, AME–AME 0.18, PLE–PME 0.09, PME–PME 0.79. Fovea deep, slightly procurved, on one third of the carapace, occupying about one fifth of carapace width at that point. Four pairs of radial furrows (Fig. 3A).

Chelicera 6.94 long, 4.80 high, with long white grey setae. Promargin with dense brown hairs, retromargin with one row of 11 teeth, fang furrow with 35 denticles, strikers spiniform. Fang 5.54 long (Fig. 3G and H).

Labium 1.68 long, 2.21 wide, with 457 cuspules, covering almost 1/3 of area of labium, terminal brown, with long bristles (Fig. 3D).

Maxilla 4.73 long, 2.18 wide, with 267 cuspules. Stridulating lyra almost two times longer than height, with two kinds of stridulating setae: one row of 10 club-shaped, straight setae and dense spiniform setae (Fig. 3C, E and F).

Sternum 5.20 long, 4.47 wide, yellow brown, covered with two kinds of hairs: black erect bristles and non-erect brown hairs, separated from labium by fan-shaped areas. Three pairs of sigilla present, anterior pair small, oval; posterior pairs larger (Fig. 3D).

Legs with dense long and white setae on patellae and tibiae, without any spines. Tarsi I–III with 2 claws, tarsus IV with 3 claws, without denticle. Leg measurements: I 43.11 (12.46 + 4.92+ 11.17 + 8.57 + 5.99), II 37.47 (10.34 + 3.47 + 9.99 + 7.74 + 5.93), III 31.93 (8.07 + 3.28 + 8.09 + 8.12 + 4.37), IV 44.09 (11.57 + 3.45 + 11.55 + 11.92 + 5.60). Leg formula: 4123. Scopula on tarsus IV cracked by a band of macrosetae, scopulae of tarsi I–III not divided.

Abdomen 12.11 long, 6.37 wide, oval, without any pattern, covered with long light brown and white setae of varying lengths. PMS 1.75 long, PLS 8.99 long.

Palp (Fig. 5, Fig. 6A, B and Fig. 7A). Tibia with many setae laterally, swollen at base. Bulb oval, with tegular apophysis; embolus slightly curved, slender, sickle-shaped, with weakly developed apical, prolateral inferior and prolateral superior keels. Distal edge of embolus flat.

Female (one paratype, IZCAS-Ar43552) (Fig. 2B, Fig. 4 and Fig. 9d).

Figure 9.

Spermathecae of Chilobrachys species in China, dorsal view. Abbreviations: CA contraction area; SL spermathecal lobe; St stalk.

aC. guangxiensis from Sanya, Hainan  
bC. hubei from Badong, Hubei (type locality)  
cC. lubricus, paratype  
dC. qishuoi sp. n., paratype (Ar43552)  

Colouration in alcohol: Same as in male (Fig. 4A).

Carapace 18.75 long, 16.54 wide, with long light brown setae. Eye group 6.41 long, 2.72 wide. MOA 2.19 long, anterior width 2.87, posterior width 4.45 (Fig. 4B). Eye sizes and interdistances: ALE 1.29, AME 0.98, PLE 1.24, PME 1.05; ALE–AME 0.66, AME–AME 0.71, PLE–PME 0.37, PME–PME 2.90. Others as in male (Fig. 4A).

Chelicera 10.68 long, 7.93 high, with long light brown setae. Promargin with dense brown hairs, retromargin with one row of 18 teeth, fang furrow with 94 denticles, strikers spiniform. Fang 8.68 long (Fig. 4G and H).

Labium 2.60 long, 2.98 wide, with 580 cuspules, others as in male (Fig. 4D).

Maxilla 8.02 long, 4.29 wide, with 580 cuspules. Stridulating lyra almost three times longer than its height, others as in male (Fig. 4C, E and F).

Sternum 8.48 long, 5.13 wide, others as in male (Fig. 4D).

Legs with long and short brown setae, others as in male. Leg measurements: I 52.92 (15.19 + 6.58+ 13.56 + 9.37 + 8.22), II 45.25 (13.09 + 5.90 + 11.21 + 8.67 + 6.38), III 40.12 (10.16 + 5.30 + 9.04 + 9.04 + 6.58), IV 51.89 (13.47 + 5.46 + 12.72 + 13.18 + 7.06). Leg formula: 1423.

Abdomen 20.36 long, 12.38 wide, covered with long light brown setae of varying lengths. PMS 2.75 long, PLS 11.87 long.

Spermathecae (Fig. 9d) simple. Two separated spermathecal lobes, without branch, middle with contraction, swollen distally, straight with genital furrow. Receptacles: 1.62 long, neck width 0.32, base width 0.71; contraction area: 0.46 long; spermathecal lobe: 0.50 long, 0.44 wide. LSE: 1.13 wide, BSE: 0.77 wide. BRV: 56%, LRV: 27%, LBW: 48%, NBW: 35%, NLW: 72%, LSE–BSE 68%.

Diagnosis

The new species is similar in habitus to C. hubei: the male with dense white setae on carapace, patellae and tibiae and the female with light brown carapace and chelicerae (Fig. 2A and B, Yu et al. 2021, figs. 3A and B). The bulbis similar to those of C. hubei and C. liboensis in having the same angle of the embolus relative to the bulb. The spermathecae are similar to those of C. hubei and C. lubricus by the spermathecal lobes swollen, with contraction at the neck, the base of the receptacles wider than the spermathecal lobes. The ratio of the length of the receptacle to BSE is almost 1:0.5 in C. qishuoi sp. n. and C. hubei and the length ratio of the spermathecal lobe to the contraction area is almost 1:1 in C. qishuoi sp. n. and C. lubricus (Fig. 9c, d, Yu et al. 2021, figs. 2C–E).

However, the male of C. qishuoi sp. n. can be distinguished from that of C. hubei by the apical keel with an angle range of 60° to 90° (Fig. 7) [vs. 120° in C. hubei (Fig. 8c) and 150° in C. liboensis (Fig. 8e)], the terminal of the embolus at a right angle in C. qishuoi sp. n. (Fig. 7) [vs. blunt in C. hubei and C. liboensis (Fig. 8c, e)] and the length ratio of the prolateral inferior keel to the apical keel almost 75%–80% in C. qishuoi sp. n. (Fig. 7) [vs. 62% in C. hubei (Fig. 8c) and 42% in C. liboensis (Fig. 8e)]. In females, the length ratio of the spermathecal lobes to the neck is almost 1:1 in C. qishuoi sp. n. (Fig. 9d) [vs. 1:0.25 in C. hubei (Fig. 9b, Yu et al. 2021, fig. 2F)], the receptacles are at 90° angle with genital furrow, with LBW almost 50% and the ratio of the length of the receptacle to the BSE almost 1:0.5 (Fig. 9d) [vs. 75° angle, LBW more than 50% and the ratio almost 1:0.3 in C. lubricus (Fig. 9c, Yu et al. 2021, figs. 2D and E)].

Etymology

The species is named after Mr. Shuo Qi, who collected type material; noun (name) in genitive case.

Distribution

Known only from the type locality (China, Guangdong) (Fig. 10).

Figure 10.  

Distribution records of Chilobrachys species in China: 1 C. dominus; 2 C. guangxiensis; 3 C. hubei; 4 C. jinchengi; 5 C. liboensis; 6 C. lubricus; 7 C. qishuoi sp. n.

Ecology

The specimens were found in barren limestone rock walls with some vegetation (Fig. 1B). They construct their retreats in natural rock burrows formed in the karst landscape; the burrows are usually about 6 to 8 cm in diameter. The web extends 20 to 30 cm inwards from the burrow (Fig. 1A). At night, they move to the entrance of the burrow, waiting for prey to pass by (Fig. 1C).

DNA barcode

CTATTATTAGATCATCTGTTGGGAAGCGTGAGCCCTTCGGAACTTTGGGAATAATTTATGCTATGGTTAGAATTGGTGGGATGGGGTTTGTTGTATGAGCTCATCATATGTTTTCTGTGGGAATAGATGTAGATACGCGGGCATATTTTACGGCAGCAACTATGGTGATTGCTGTCCCTACGGGAATTAGGGTATTTAGATGAATAGCTACGTTGTATGGATCTTACTTTAAGATGGATACCTCTTTGATATGGTGTGTTGGGTTCGTTTTTTTGTTTACTTTAGGGGGATTAACCGGGGTGGTTTTGGCTAATTCTTCTTTGGATATTATTTTGCATGATACTTATTATGTGGTTGCTCATTTTC (Ar43552, GenBank accession number OP394115).

Acknowledgements

The manuscript benefited greatly from comments by Alireza Zamani, Rick C. West and Volker von Wirth. Danni Sherwood (UK) checked the English. Shuo Qi (Guangdong, Sun Yat-Sen University), Hanming Song (Guangdong, Sun Yat-Sen University), Yongyou Zhao (Guangdong, Shimentai National Nature Reserve), Fengbin Yu (Guangxi) and Jincheng Liu (Beijing) helped with the fieldwork. This research was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC-31972869).

References

login to comment