Biodiversity Data Journal :
General research article
|
Corresponding author:
Academic editor: Benjamin Price
Received: 01 Oct 2015 | Accepted: 30 Mar 2016 | Published: 27 Apr 2016
© 2016 Emile Fiesler, Tracy Drake
This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Citation:
Fiesler E, Drake T (2016) Macro-invertebrate Biodiversity of a Coastal Prairie with Vernal Pool Habitat. Biodiversity Data Journal 4: e6732. https://doi.org/10.3897/BDJ.4.e6732
|
The California Coastal Prairie has the highest biodiversity of North America's grasslands, but also has the highest percentage of urbanization. The most urbanized part of the California Coastal Prairie is its southernmost area, in Los Angeles County. This southernmost region, known as the Los Angeles Coastal Prairie, was historically dotted with vernal pools, and has a unique biodiverse composition. More than 99.5% of its estimated original 95 km2 (23,475 acres), as well as almost all its vernal pool complexes, have been lost to urbanization.
The Madrona Marsh Preserve, in Torrance, California, safeguards approximately 18 hectares (44 acres) of Los Angeles Coastal Prairie and includes a complex of vernal pools. Its aquatic biodiversity had been studied, predominantly to genus level, but its terrestrial macro-invertebrates were virtually unknown, aside from butterfly, dragonfly, and damselfly observations.
In order to better understand the biodiversity at the Madrona Marsh Preserve, a minimally-invasive macro-invertebrate inventory was conducted. The results of this inventory, with 689 invertebrate organisms recorded, covering eight phyla, 13 classes, 39 orders, and 222 families, are presented in this document.
biological diversity, ephemeral pool, wetland, dune, upland, terrestrial, aquatic, invertebrate, Arthropoda, Hexapoda, Insecta, Lepidoptera, Odonata, Coleoptera, Hymenoptera, Diptera, Hemiptera, Heteroptera, Orthoptera, Neuroptera, Psocodea, Thysanoptera, Blattodea, Embioptera, Dermaptera, Microcoryphia, Collembola, Arachnida, Araneae, Acari, Mollusca, Gastropoda, checklist, taxonomy, classification, systematics, bio-inventory, macro-photography, Madrona Marsh Preserve, Torrance
The California Coastal Prairie has the highest biodiversity of North America's grasslands
The Madrona Marsh Preserve
MMP is located in the South Bay area of Los Angeles County (33.827° North; 118.341° West) at approximately 24 meters (80 feet) elevation above sea level (see maps in Fig.
MMP has a Mediterranean climate with mild, dry summers and cool, wet winters. The annual average precipitation is 37.6 centimeters (14.8 inches), which almost all falls between mid October and late March. August is usually the warmest month of the year, with an average maximum temperature of 25.9 degrees Celsius (78.7 degrees Fahrenheit). December is usually the coldest month of the year with an average minimum temperature of 7.8 °C (46.0 °F). Temperature variations between night and day vary from an average of 9 °C (17 °F) in summer to 11 °C (20 °F) in winter
MMP is a nature oasis in an urban setting; see map in Fig.
Map of Madrona Marsh Preserve.
Each red X-mark indicates the location of one of the ten pitfall traps. Each purple C-mark indicates the location of one of the eight sets of three coverboards.
Vegetation is shown in shades of green and yellow, vernal pools in pink, water inundation levels in shades of blue, the remaining upland areas in shades of light brown, and man-made structures in darker brown. Prominent trees and shrubs are indicated by black letters in pink-rimmed white circles. The Nature Center, surrounded by native plant gardens, is located north of Plaza del Amo, and the sump, a neighborhood runoff water collection reservoir, is located in the southeast corner of the preserve.
Map created by Jerry Cole, 2011.
Between November 16, 2009 and August 31st, 2011 the first author conducted a minimally-invasive biodiversity inventory of the macro-invertebrates of the Preserve, often accompanied by the second author during field work. This study was part of a biological inventory that also included vertebrate animals and vascular plants. Goals of the bioinventory included researching historical data, providing a baseline inventory of the current MMP taxa to be able to compare future inventory date to, creating factual knowledge for education and outreach, as well as providing habitat restoration and enhancement recommendations for the Preserve.
The MMP macro-invertebrate bioinventory is unique in several aspects. It is the first macro-invertebrate bioinventory of its kind and scope, uniquely based on photographic vouchers, rather than the traditional captured specimen vouchers. It was performed with minimal manpower, and its scope is broad, aiming to include all taxa. This novel approach is made possible due to the advent of high-quality digital photography, which allows for taking, processing, organizing, and archiving large amounts of detailed photos, needed for such a project. The Internet is another technology that enables small teams to complete macro-invertebrates bioinventory projects in a limited time. BugGuide in specific is an extensive on-line resource with an unprecedented collection of more than 820,000 arthropod photos, taxonomically classified and organized by more than 280 editors and experts
Related studies by others - an overview
Biodiversity, including urban biodiversity, is critical to human sustainability
Surprisingly few macro-invertebrate or all-taxa inventories have taken place in general
Mark Angelos performed a high-quality study of MMP's vernal pool arthropods, gastropods, vertebrates, and plants, between 1993 and 2003. At that time he was Research Associate in Invertebrate Zoology at the Los Angeles County of Natural History. He predominantly used nets and recorded 76 animal taxa, of which 67 arthropods, five mollusks, and four vertebrates; most of which he identified to genus
W. Dwight Pierce, together with Dorothy Pool and others, performed field studies in the El Segundo Dunes from 1938 to 1939 and published highlights of their findings in a series of articles published between 1938 and 1947
Rudi Mattoni and his team performed a study of the flora and fauna of the 746 hectares (302 acre) El Segundo dune remnant at the west side of Los Angeles International Airport (LAX) from June 1987 to June 1988
Travis Longcore, who participated in the arthropod study mentioned above
The Ballona Wetlands, located north of the northern boundary of the Los Angeles Prairie, consisted of approximately two thousand acres of coastal wetland habitat. Most of these wetlands have been lost to urbanization, including nine hundred acres for the construction of a small craft harbor and adjoining community in the 1960's, now known as Marina del Rey. The remaining six hundred acres consist of estuarine, brackish, and freshwater marshes, seasonal wetlands and other riparian habitats, as well as uplands. From 1980 to 1981, a one year biological study was performed on the Ballona Wetlands, which included the recording of 475 insects and mollusks
Emile Fiesler conducted a macroinvertebrate bioinventory of the Oxford Basin in 2010. The Oxford Basin, located in Marina del Rey, is one of the last remaining areas with intertidal mud flat habitat in Los Angeles County. He recorded 85 terrestrial and marine taxa (two mollusks, eight spiders, 67 insects, and eight other arthropods), using macro-photography, during three half days of field work spread over four months
Louis LaPierre and Pamela Wright surveyed the arthropod fauna of the Kenneth Hahn State Recreation Area during June and July of 2000
Emile Fiesler conducted a study of the non-marine macro-invertebrates of the Santa Monica Mountains National Recreation Area (SMMNRA)
Peter Bryant has set-up an extensive internet website on the biodiversity of "Orange County and nearby places"
Nancy Hamlett is in charge of an all-taxa biota study of the 210 ha (85 acre) Robert J. Bernard Biological Field Station of the Claremont Colleges. The Bernard Field Station is located in the city of Claremont, approximately 58 km (36 miles) east of downtown Los Angeles. The ongoing study covered 352 invertebrate taxa, as well as vertebrates, plants, and lichens
Studies on plants, vertebrate animals, and insects of the 2,469 ha (6,100 acre) Philip L. Boyd Deep Canyon Desert Natural Reserve have been coordinated by the University of California, Riverside. The Reserve is located five miles south of the City of Palm Desert in Riverside County; in the Colorado Subdivision of the Sonoran Desert. A succession of researchers, students, and visiting scientists have surveyed insects at the Reserve over the past 34 years
An all-taxa bioinventory was conducted as part of the San Diego Bay Integrated Natural Resources Management Plan
Gordon Pratt conducted a survey of the terrestrial arthropods of Edwards Air Force Base between January 1996 and October 1998
The Southern California Association of Marine Invertebrate Taxonomists (SCAMIT) has compiled a list of benthic macro- and mega-invertebrates. The data is compiled from various infaunal and epifaunal monitoring and research programs conducted in the Southern California Bight, mostly based on trawling. The Southern California Bight area covered by the list extends from Point Conception in Santa Barbara County, California to Bahía Todos Santos, Baja California Sur, Mexico, in intertidal to 1000 meter depths. This geographical area includes the off-shore areas of Los Angeles, Orange, San Diego, and Ventura Counties, plus the southern section of Santa Barbara County and the northwestern-most section of Baja California Norte. The ninth edition lists 3,177 taxa
The following sections detail the methodologies used for the terrestrial and aquatic invertebrates surveys. The surveys performed for this project are unique as they were conducted with minimal invasiveness. A minimally invasive study aims at studying organisms with minimum disturbance and without collecting them; relying primarily on high-resolution digital photography. To maximize taxonomic identification success, close-up photos are taken from various angles, where possible. Nevertheless, not having a specimen in hand tends to increase the complexity of taxonomic identification, as certain characteristic details, some of which could be internal, might not be visible.
Common terrestrial invertebrates are mostly comprised of hexapods and arachnids. Other, less species-rich taxa include: isopods, terrestrial snails, and earthworms. Terrestrial invertebrates can be divided into (1) herbivores and detritivores, which are the primary consumers, and (2) predators, parasites, and parasitoids. The herbivores and detritivores comprise the lower levels of the food chain. Terrestrial herbivores are usually associated with certain host- or food-plants, which are predominantly plants native to the area. Native plants are therefore the base for a healthy terrestrial ecosystem.
The minimally invasive terrestrial invertebrate survey was performed in stages, using the following methodologies:
Each of these four data collection methodologies is explained below.
Visual detection took place during all visits of the site and formed an important part of the data collection. We made an effort to choose a different transect for every visit to maximize coverage of the area. We surveyed at various parts of the day, from the early morning to after dark, with an average of 2.5 hours per survey. Keen visual observation enables recording taxa that are not typically obtained by other methods and would go unnoticed. Specimens were photographed using a Canon Powershot A650 IS in macro-photography setting. Each specimen was photographed from various angles, aiming for dorsal, lateral, and frontal exposures; limited by the time the specimen remained present.
Eight sets of three wooden coverboards were placed throughout the preserve, mostly at shady locations to minimize direct sun exposure. Each of the 24 square coverboards measured three by three feet (91 centimeters) in length and 0.5" inch (1.3 cm) thick. The map in Fig.
Ten independent pitfall traps, consisting of 1.75-liter white polypropylene containers with smooth, near-vertical walls, were placed on June 17 and September 10, 2010, at various well-spaced locations from the waterline to the higher parts of the core upland areas Fig.
The night light data collection took place on April 13, May 12, June 17, August 10, September 9, and December 1 of 2010, and on February 23, April 6, August 23, and November 8, 2011; mostly on dates close to a new moon. New moon assures minimum light from the sky as well as maximizes insect, especially moth, activity, apparently due to high light polarization levels
The combined results of all the data collection methods described above, consists of more than 21,000 digital photos. The photos have been stored in an hierarchical data structure ordered by year and date, based on each photo's date and time stamp. Representatives of each specimen photographed have been copied into a separate hierarchical data structure, sorted on taxonomic order. Each digital photo in the taxonomic data structure has been assigned a filename that includes the organism's scientific name and common name, together with other available data, including size and field-marks. This file naming strategy enables fast, operating-system-level, text-based searches for retrieving data.
In addition to the data collection methodologies described above, we also performed dedicated sampling of MMP's aquatic habitats. Data collection of aquatic organisms was performed several times a month between April and July 2010, using a combination of two techniques:
These techniques were applied at a variety of locations, including small vernal pools and the sump, which is a large basin that collects runoff water from the surrounding neighborhood. The sampling locations were changed each week, and at these locations various micro-habitats (open water, near emergent vegetation, near tree roots, and under floating aquatic vegetation) were sampled at varying depths (from the shallowest to the deepest water), to maximize the chances of capturing organisms from a broad range of habitats.
The samples were taken to the MMP Nature Center’s curation lab, where they were examined by the first author, using a variety of microscopes and photographically recorded using a number of digital imaging techniques. After examination, the samples were returned to the Preserve. The results of the aquatic sampling have been integrated into Suppl. material
As the number of described macro-invertebrate taxa is immense, estimated at more than 1,300,000
Before presenting the overall results, the outcome of a few selected data collection methodologies are presented, as they tend to contain method-specific data of interest.
The pitfall trap results yielded several species not recorded by the other methodologies. The most striking find was Ceuthophilus hesperus clunicornis Hubbell, 1936, (San Diego camel cricket); see Fig.
Other unique pitfall trap discoveries are three small native beetles:
The pitfall trap closest to the waterline yielded, besides two aquatic ground beetles, many hundreds of springtails (class: Collembola); see Figs
An overview of the results of our night data collection efforts are shown in Table
Overview tally of specimens recorded during night data collection sessions, grouped by selected higher taxa (order, superfamily, family, etc.). Related higher taxa are grouped together and sorted in phylogenic order
Note: Numbers in boldface font indicate maxima - greater than 1 - for each taxon. (Sub)totals per taxon, and per month, are added in the margins.
Year: |
2010 |
2011 |
|||||||||||||
Phylum |
Class |
Order |
Taxon group |
Common name |
Apr |
May |
Jun |
Aug |
Sep |
Dec |
Feb |
Apr |
Aug |
Nov |
Total |
Annelida |
Clite-llata |
Haplotaxida |
Haplotaxida |
Earthworms & kin |
1 |
1 |
|||||||||
Artho-poda |
Arachnida |
Arachnida |
Spiders & kin |
1 |
2 |
1 |
3 |
1 |
2 |
1 |
2 |
13 |
|||
Collembola |
Collembola |
Springtails |
3 |
2 |
2 |
1 |
1 |
9 |
|||||||
Insecta |
Orthoptera |
Orthoptera |
Grasshoppers & kin |
1 |
1 |
||||||||||
Dermaptera |
Dermaptera |
Earwigs |
1 |
1 |
|||||||||||
Hemiptera |
Aphidoidea |
Aphids |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
4 |
||||||||
Auchenorrhyncha |
Hoppers |
2 |
4 |
3 |
6 |
2 |
1 |
18 |
|||||||
Psylloidea |
Psyllids |
1 |
1 |
2 |
|||||||||||
Heteroptera |
Bugs |
1 |
1 |
1 |
3 |
||||||||||
Psocoptera |
Psocoptera |
Barklice |
1 |
1 |
2 |
4 |
|||||||||
Coleoptera |
Scarabeidae |
Scarabs |
4 |
5 |
1 |
1 |
11 |
||||||||
other Coleoptera |
other Beetles |
1 |
3 |
3 |
2 |
1 |
6 |
16 |
|||||||
Neuroptera |
Hemerobiiformia |
Lacewings |
1 |
1 |
|||||||||||
Hymenoptera |
"Parasitica" |
Parasitoid Wasps |
1 |
1 |
1 |
3 |
1 |
7 |
|||||||
Formicidae |
Ants |
2 |
1 |
1 |
4 |
||||||||||
Lepidoptera |
<no taxon> |
Moths |
3 |
33 |
24 |
11 |
12 |
2 |
5 |
16 |
4 |
110 |
|||
Diptera |
Chironomidae |
Midges |
6 |
15 |
4 |
1 |
2 |
28 |
|||||||
other Nematocera |
other "lower" Flies |
9 |
5 |
3 |
8 |
2 |
1 |
2 |
30 |
||||||
Brachycera |
"higher" Flies |
4 |
2 |
1 |
3 |
2 |
3 |
3 |
1 |
19 |
|||||
Total: |
25 |
71 |
49 |
30 |
38 |
4 |
3 |
14 |
39 |
9 |
282 |
The results of the night data collection show that moths are by far the most frequently encountered, followed by chironomidae (non-biting midges) and various other Nematocera ("lower flies"). The maximum number of specimens were encountered in May, followed by June and September. Only five individuals, and no moths at all, were recorded for December. The species recorded by our night data collection efforts are included in Suppl. material
Besides macro-invertebrates, we also recorded the presence of some of the more salient aquatic micro-invertebrates that were caught in our water samples. These taxa have been added to Suppl. material
It is difficult to compare our data one-to-one with those obtained by Mark Angelos (1993–2004; as detailed above), due to the fact that his specimens were identified to genus or family level and those in our study (2009–2010) to various levels ranging from family to (sub)species. Nevertheless, we attempt to compare our data by estimating the number of genera obtained in each study, and then comparing which genera are present in both studies. Genera recorded during 2009–2010, but not during 1993–2004, are added in the column labeled "gained", and genera recorded during 1993–2004, but not during 2009–2010, are added in a column labeled "lost" The combined result is shown in Table
Comparison of aquatic invertebrate data obtained by Mark Angelos' ("1993-2004") and our study ("2009-2010").
The numbers represent estimated number of genera. Totals can be found in the bottom-most row of the table.
Nomenclature used: "gained" = number of genera recorded in this study, but not by Mark Angelos; "lost" = number of genera recorded by Mark Angelos, but not in this study; "vs." = versus.
Phylum |
Class |
Order |
1993-2004 |
2009-2010 |
"gained" |
"lost" |
Comments |
Mollusca |
Gastropoda |
<multiple> |
5 |
2 |
0 |
3 |
|
Arthropoda |
Ostracoda |
<multiple> |
6 |
5 |
0 |
1 |
difficult to match: higher taxa vs. species |
Arthropoda |
Branchiopoda |
Anostraca |
3 |
2 |
0 |
1 |
|
Arthropoda |
Insecta |
Ephemeroptera |
1 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
same species |
Arthropoda |
Insecta |
Odonata |
8 |
10 |
3 |
1 |
lost: Lestes congener |
Arthropoda |
Insecta |
Hemiptera |
7 |
3 |
0 |
4 |
|
Arthropoda |
Insecta |
Coleoptera |
14 |
6 |
1 |
9 |
|
Arthropoda |
Insecta |
Diptera |
24 |
24 |
8 |
8 |
difficult to match: matures vs. immatures |
Totals: |
54 |
44 |
12 |
22 |
net loss = 10 taxa = 19% |
It is difficult to proof that an organism is not present in a given area. There are however some salient organisms that have not been encountered during our study or reported during the last decade. We are fairly sure that these organisms have been extirpated, or become extinct, at MMP. The following two salient invertebrate taxa were recorded by Mark Angelos and have not been observed during the last decade: Lestes congener Hagen, 1861 (Spotted Spreadwing) and Mesovelia sp. (Water Treader). These losses might be due to a decrease in water quality. Also potentially extirpated are Buenoa and Nononecta spp. (Backswimmers), Haliplus sp. (Crawling Water Beetle), Hydraenidae (Minute Moss Beetles), and Noteridae (Burrowing Water Beetles); although more intensive aquatic sampling over a longer time frame might reveal the continued presence of these taxa.
Mark Angelos has donated his MMP aquatic invertebrate specimen collection, and associated documentation, to the MMP Nature Center. This enables the possibility to identify his specimens to species level and recreate a detailed MMP aquatic invertebrate fauna for the period 1993–2004, as well as a higher quality comparison to MMP's current aquatic invertebrate fauna.
To put the data collection period in perspective, we add some information on the weather during the timeframe of the project. A lot of the data was collected in the year 2010, which was a year with unusual weather. The spring and summer of 2010 were surprisingly breezy, and the coolest on record, temperature-wise. However, the highest temperatures ever measured in Los Angeles were recorded on September 27, 2010, with an all-time record of 113 degrees Fahrenheit for the downtown area. Furthermore, in late December 2010, Los Angeles received an exceptional amount of rain from one storm-system, more than seven inches. Invertebrates are exothermic, relying on the ambient temperature to warm their body in order to get active. The cool and breezy weather during the peak annual activity time was therefore not optimal for invertebrate abundance. During 2011 we collected data until August 30th. This year (2011) also had a cool summer. We nevertheless recorded a large amount of data, and can only expect to encounter even larger biodiversity during more 'normal' years.
During the project period, more than 12,500 digital photos were taken, processed, identified, and archived. Besides those, more than 9,500 digital photos had been taken and archived during the period from 2003 until the start of the project. A small fraction of this older data have been processed and identified and these taxa have been included in this report. Combining all the available data, a total of 689 invertebrate organisms were recorded, covering 8 phyla, 13 classes, 39 orders, and 222 families. A summary of the statistics for the highest, and some of the most salient, taxa are given in Table
Summary of order-level statistics of recorded invertebrate taxa.
The data is grouped by most salient higher-level taxa. (Sub)totals per higher-level taxon are added in the bottom and top row, highlighted in yellow.
ePhylum |
Class |
Order |
Family |
taxa |
Common Name (MMP taxa) |
8 |
16 |
39 |
222 |
689 |
= Totals |
Annelida |
1 |
2 |
3 |
5 |
Annelids |
Arthropoda |
8 |
29 |
205 |
669 |
Arthropods |
Arachnida |
3 |
34 |
73 |
Arachnids |
|
Acari |
14 |
23 |
Mites |
||
Araneae |
19 |
48 |
Spiders |
||
Solifugae |
1 |
2 |
Solifugids |
||
Branchiopoda |
2 |
3 |
4 |
Fairy Shrimp, Waterfleas, & kin |
|
Cladocera |
2 |
2 |
Waterfleas |
||
Anostraca |
1 |
2 |
Fairy Shrimp |
||
Chilopoda |
1 |
1 |
1 |
Centipedes |
|
Collembola |
2 |
3 |
6 |
Springtails |
|
Insecta |
16 |
157 |
574 |
Insects |
|
Coleoptera |
23 |
106 |
Beetles |
||
Dermaptera |
2 |
2 |
Earwigs |
||
Diptera |
36 |
155 |
Flies, Mosquitos, & kin |
||
Embiidina |
1 |
1 |
Webspinners |
||
Ephemeroptera |
1 |
1 |
Mayflies |
||
Hemiptera |
25 |
82 |
True Bugs, Hoppers, Aphids, & kin |
||
Hymenoptera |
27 |
101 |
Wasps, Ants, Bees, & Sawflies |
||
Blattodea |
1 |
1 |
Termites |
||
Lepidoptera |
20 |
84 |
Butterflies & Moths |
||
Microcoryphia |
1 |
1 |
Bristletails |
||
Neuroptera |
3 |
3 |
Lacewings & Antlions |
||
Odonata |
3 |
15 |
Dragonflies & Damselflies |
||
Orthoptera |
5 |
11 |
Grasshoppers, Crickets & kin |
||
Psocoptera |
5 |
7 |
Barklice |
||
Thysanoptera |
3 |
3 |
Thrips |
||
Zygentoma |
1 |
1 |
Silverfish |
||
Malacostraca |
3 |
5 |
6 |
Crayfish, Scuds, Isopods, & kin |
|
Amphipoda |
2 |
3 |
Scuds |
||
Decapoda |
1 |
1 |
Decapods = Crayfish |
||
Isopoda |
2 |
2 |
Isopods |
||
Maxillopoda |
1 |
1 |
1 |
Copepods |
|
Ostracoda |
1 |
1 |
4 |
Seed Shrimp |
|
Cnidaria |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
Hydroids |
Mollusca |
1 |
2 |
7 |
8 |
Molluscs |
Gastropoda |
2 |
7 |
8 |
Snails & Slugs |
|
Stylommatophora |
5 |
6 |
Terrestrial Snails & Slugs |
||
Basommatophora |
2 |
2 |
Freshwater Snails |
||
Nematoda |
2 |
2 |
2 |
2 |
Nematodes = Roundworms |
Platyhelminthes |
1 |
1 |
2 |
2 |
Flatworms |
Rotifera |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
Rotifers = Wheel Animals |
Tardigrada |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
Tardigrades = Water Bears |
8 |
16 |
39 |
222 |
689 |
=Totals |
All the 689 taxa are listed in Suppl. material
Of particular interest is the presence of native flightless species, that have likely persisted throughout the human-influenced history of the land that is now Madrona Marsh Preserve, including:
Typhoctes peculiaris peculiaris (Cresson, 1875), a bradynobaenid wasp, see Fig.
Pseudomethoca anthracina (Fox, 1892), a velvet ant, see Fig.
Eremobates sp., a large solifugid, see Figs
Some taxa were notable for their absence, including Diplopoda (millipedes), Opiliones (harvestmen), Scorpiones (scorpions), Pseudoscorpiones (pseudoscorpions), cockroaches, Mantodea (mantids), Phasmida (stick insects), Nematomorpha (hairworms), and Diplura. Diplopoda (millipedes) have been observed by Walt Wright (MMP manager preceding Tracy Drake) in the past, but have possibly been extirpated. Similarly, only one kind of Chilopoda (centipede) was found, and only in small numbers. Native Corydiidae (sand roaches) are not expected at MMP due to lack of soft sand habitat, and adventive cockroaches have been recorded in urban areas not far from the Preserve, but are closely associated with human activity and not expected to be permanent resident on the Preserve. Native mantids are relatively uncommon in Los Angeles County and not expected at MMP due to its isolation within urbanization. Adventive mantids are introduced in urban settings as pest control, and it is no surprise not to find them on the Preserve either. Most of the remaining taxa that were not found are associated with fairly undisturbed habitats or other habitats that are not present at the Preserve.
Some notorious and ubiquitous Los Angeles County adventives, like Ceratitis capitata (Wiedemann, 1824) (Mediterranean Fruit Fly), Homalodisca vitripennis (Germar, 1821) (Glassy-winged Sharpshooter), and Sophonia orientalis (Matsumura, 1912) (Oriental Leafhopper) were not recorded from MMP. An interesting adventive species that was recorded from the Preserve is the Outer Barklouse Ectopsocus strauchi Enderlein 1906, see Figs
No doubt species will be found in the future that are not on the list. These will predominantly be new colonizers, visiting vagrants, and obscure species in under-sampled habitats, including infauna of the soil, microscopic aquatic fauna, and ectoparasites of vertebrates, which were outside the scope of this project. Also, as mentioned before, years with different weather patterns are likely to reveal species that were not encountered during the study period.
This study can nevertheless be considered quite successful, given the available time and other resources. The list of recorded taxa will change over time, as some species come and some go, especially winged ones. The current list constitutes a solid baseline to compare future data with, and can be used as data source for educational and outreach purposes.
Gratefully acknowledged are the Friends of Madrona Marsh and the City of Torrance for their financial support of part of this work.
The county, or counties, where the survey took place is highlighted in light green for surveys areas including Los Angeles County.
Abbreviations and symbols used: A = arachnids & myriapods; B = Beach; F = fresh-water invertebrates; H = hexapods (= insects and kin); ha = hectares; invert. = invertebrates; LA = Los Angeles County; LAX = Los Angeles International Airport; "n/a" (non-applicable; highlighted in orange) = survey range does not include this habitat; M = mollusks; MI = marine invertebrates; OC = Orange County; PV = Palos Verdes Peninsula; SD = San Diego County; SRA = State Recreation Area; "unk." = unknown; "~" = approximately; ">" = greater than; "+" = at least.
The following is a list of all invertebrates recorded at Madrona Marsh Preserve for the project described in this document.
For each taxon, the columnar data in table in the Appendix consists of:
Scientific name & taxonomy: Phylum, Class, Order, Family, Tribe, Genus, Species, Subspecies / Variant
Common Name
Whether the taxon is adventive / non-native
Whether the specimen was observed at night
Abbreviations used: A = adventive taxon; B = introduced for biocontrol; cf. = (Latin: confer) = compare; E = migrant that expanded its range; imm = immature; N = recorded after sunset; n/a = not applicable; nr. = near; S. Cal. = Southern California; s.l. = (Latin: sensu lato) = broadly; var. = variant.
Color coding used: GREEN = high taxonomic certainty; YELLOW = intermediate taxonomic certainty; ORANGE = low taxonomic certainty.