Biodiversity Data Journal : Taxonomy & Inventories
PDF
Taxonomy & Inventories
A new species of Papiliomyces (Clavicipiteae, Hypocreales) from China
expand article infoYan Zhang‡, TingChi Wen‡,§,|, Yuanpin Xiao¶,§, Yu Yang|, Xingcan Peng
‡ College of Pharmacy, Guizhou University, Guiyang, China
§ Engineering Research Center of Southwest Bio-Pharmaceutical Resources, Ministry of Education, Guizhou University, Guiyang, China
| The Mushroom Research Centre, Guizhou University, Guiyang, China
¶ Center of Excellence in Fungal Research, and School of Science, Mae Fah Luang University, Chiang Rai, Thailand
Corresponding author: TingChi Wen (tingchiwen@yahoo.com)
Academic editor: Danny Haelewaters
Received: 23 May 2022 | Accepted: 20 Apr 2023 | Published: 06 Jun 2023
© 2023 Yan Zhang, TingChi Wen, Yuanpin Xiao, Yu Yang, Xingcan Peng
This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Citation: Zhang Y, Wen T, Xiao Y, Yang Y, Peng X (2023) A new species of Papiliomyces (Clavicipiteae, Hypocreales) from China. Biodiversity Data Journal 11: e86868. https://doi.org/10.3897/BDJ.11.e86868
 Open Access

Abstract

Background

Papiliomyces (Hypocreales, Sordariomycetes) was introduced to accommodate two species: Papiliomyces liangshanensis and Papiliomyces shibinensis. Later, Papiliomyces liangshanensis was renamed Ophiocordyceps liangshanensis. However, the Papiliomyces liangshanensis molecular data (Nepalese) used to establish the Papiliomyces genus was different from Ophiocordyceps liangshanensis (China) strains.

New information

This paper describes a new species, Papiliomyces longiclavatus, found in Yangchang District, Guiyang City, Guizhou Province, China. It is proposed, based on morphology and multilocus phylogeny (ITS, SSU, LSU, TEF1, RPB1 and RPB2). The new species is phylogenetically most closely related to Papiliomyces liangshanensis (Nepalese collections). However, Papiliomyces liangshanensis (Nepalese collections) requires morphological details and additional detection. The new species differs from other Papiliomyces species in having robust stroma with completely immersed perithecia, multi-septate ascospores, cylindrical secondary ascospores, two types of phialides and two types of conidia:longer α-conidia and longer β-conidia.

Keywords

Papiliomyces, molecular phylogeny, one new species, taxonomy

Introduction

Fungi are amongst the most important organisms, influencing human activities and playing a crucial role in ecosystems (Mueller and Schmit 2007). About 2000 species of fungi are being described annually (Cheek et al. 2020). Entomopathogenic fungi have received great attention due to their ecological, economic and medical applications (Yang et al. 2021). However, the diversity of entomopathogenic fungi necessitates additional research.

Sung et al. (2007a) introduced the genus Metacordyceps to accommodate some species of Cordyceps, characterised by solitary to multiple stromata, simple to branched, with a fleshy or tough whitish stipe, strongly pigmented green to yellow cylindrical to enlarged fertile part and superficial perithecia partially or completely immersed in stroma (Sung et al. 2007a, Kepler et al. 2012a). Based on the generated DNA sequences and multi-gene phylogenetic evidence, Sung et al. (2007a) reclassified some species from Metacordyceps to Papiliomyces, such as Metacordyceps liangshanensis and Metacordyceps shibinensis. This was utilised in the Outline of Ascomycota (Wijayawardene et al. 2018).

The genus Papiliomyces was proposed by Mongkolsamrit et al. (2020) in Clavicipiteae family (Hypocreales, Sordariomycetes), based on phylogenetic analyses to accommodate two species: Papiliomyces liangshanensis (Nepalese collections) and Papiliomyces shibinensis (China). However, based on morphology and phylogenetic analyses, the type species, Papiliomyces liangshanensis, was recombined into Ophiocordyceps (Wang et al. 2021). The genus name originated from the Latin word 'papilio', meaning butterfly or moth (Mongkolsamrit et al. 2020). The primary characteristics of the teleomorph of Papiliomyces are solitary to multiple (branched and robust to wiry stromata), superficial perithecia to completely immersed in the stroma, ampulliform, ellipsoid to ovoid, asci cylindrical and ascospores whole with septation or breaking into cylindrical part-spores (Kepler et al. 2012a, Kepler et al. 2012b, Mongkolsamrit et al. 2020, Wang et al. 2021).

Through culturing and molecular approaches, Metarhizium has been linked to Metacordyceps as sexual states (Kepler et al. 2014). However, they are forming distinct branches in the phylogenetic tree. Moreover, Metacordyceps is different from Metarhizium in producing superficial perithecia and a wiry, branched stromata or a white to faint yellow robust stroma (Zang et al. 1982, Sung et al. 2007b, Wen et al. 2015, Mongkolsamrit et al. 2020). Sexual morphs of Metarhizium produce semi-immersed to completely immersed perithecia on a robust and almost fleshy dark green or purplish stroma (Sorokin 1883, Sung et al. 2007a, Kepler et al. 2012a). Phylogenetically, the genus is closely related to Purpureomyces and Keithomyces (Mongkolsamrit et al. 2020). The three species of Purpureomyces (Hywel-Jones 1994, Kepler et al. 2012a, Kepler et al. 2014) differ from Papiliomyces spp. in that they can produce fleshy, purple stromata and the ascomata are obliquely embedded in the stroma (Mongkolsamrit et al. 2020). Keithomyces includes three species primarily isolated from soil, producing Paecilomyces-like asexual morphs, conidiophores with divergent whorls of two to four phialides and echinulate to aciculate conidia (Mongkolsamrit et al. 2020).

In this study, a new species, Papiliomyces longiclavatus is introduced, based on the morphology and phylogenetic analysis of a six-locus dataset.

Materials and methods

Sample collection and morphological characteristic examination

The specimens were collected from Yangchang Town, Wudang District, Guiyang City, Guizhou Province, China on 14 June 2020. They were stored in plastic containers at low temperature and transported to the laboratory for identification. The macro-morphological characteristics were described, based on fresh material and on the photographs provided here. Fresh specimens were used to isolate the fungus through the tissue culture method in a potato dextrose agar (PDA) medium. Herbarium materials were deposited at Guizhou University (GACP) and Kunming Institute of Botany, Chinese Academy of Sciences (HKAS). For micro-morphological examination, fruiting bodies and living culture mycelia were examined using a stereo dissecting microscope (Leica S9E). Hand sections of fruiting structures were mounted in water for microscopic study and photomicrography. The microcharacteristics of the fungi were examined under a Leica DM2500 compound microscope and photographed. Facesoffungi and Index Fungorum numbers were provided as explained by Jayasiri et al. (2015) and Index Fungorum (http://indexfungorum.org, accessed 6 April 2023).

DNA extraction, PCR amplification and sequencing

Dried specimens were used to extract genomic DNA using the EZgene TM Fungal gDNA Kit (Biomiga, CA, USA) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The extracted DNA was stored at -20°C. Reaction mixtures (25 μl) contained 2 μl template DNA (ca. 10 ng), 11 μl distilled water, 1 μl (10 μM) of each primer and 10 μl 2x Taq PCR StarMix with Loading Dye (GenStar). The primers for amplifying and sequencing were ITS5 and ITS4 for the internal transcribed spacer gene region (ITS) (White et al. 1990), LR0R and LR5 for the partial large subunit rDNA gene region (LSU) (Vilgalys and Hester 1990, Hopple 1994), NS1 and NS4 for the ribosomal small subunit rDNA gene region (SSU) (White et al. 1990), EF1-983F and EF1-2218R for the partial translation elongation factor 1-alpha gene region (TEF1) (Sung et al. 2007b), CRPB1 and RPB1Cr for the partial RNA polymerase II largest subunit gene region (RPB1) (Castlebury et al. 2004) and RPB2-5F2 and RPB2-7Cr for the partial RNA polymerase II second largest subunit gene region (RPB2) (Liu et al. 1999, O'Donnell et al. 2007). The PCR amplification conditions were the following: for ITS, initial denaturation at 94°C for 3 min, followed by 33 cycles of 94°C for 30 s, 51°C for 50 s and 72°C for 45 s and final extension of 72°C for 10 min; for LSU and SSU, initial denaturation at 94°C for 3 min, followed by 33 cycles at 94°C for 30 s, 51°C for 30 s and 72°C for 2 min and final extension of 72°C for 10 min; for TEF1, initial denaturation at 94°C for 3 min, followed by 33 cycles of 94°C for 30 s, 58°C for 50 s and 72°C for 1 min and final extension of 72°C for 10 min; for RPB1, initial denaturation at 94°C for 3 min, followed by 33 cycles of 94°C for 1 min, 52°C for 1 min and 72°C for 1 min and final extension at 72°C of 10 min; and for RPB2, initial denaturation at 94°C for 3 min, followed by 33 cycles of 94°C for 30 s, 54°C for 40 s and 72°C for 80 s and final extension of 72°C for 10 min. The amplified PCR products were verified by 1% agarose gel electrophoresis stained with ethidium bromide in 1x TBE. They were directly sequenced with the above-mentioned primers by Sangon Biotech (Shanghai) Co., Ltd., Shanghai, China.

Sequence alignment and phylogenetic analyses

Reference sequences were downloaded from NCBI GenBank, https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/genbank/ (Table 1). BioEdit (Alzohairy 2011) was used to assemble downloaded and newly-generated sequences. Sequences were aligned by locus with MAFFT version 7 (Katoh and Standley 2013) (https://mafft.cbrc.jp/alignment/server/) and trimmed using TrimAl version 1.3 (Capella-Gutiérrez et al. 2009). FasParser was used to splice the ITS, SSU, LSU, TEF1, RPB1 and RPB2 sequences (Katoh and Standley 2013). Gaps were considered as missing data.

Maximum Likelihood (ML) analyses were performed using IQ-TREE 2 (Minh et al. 2020) under partitioned models. The built-in ModelFinder (Kalyaanamoorthy et al. 2017) was used to select appropriate models for each of the six loci. Branch support was estimated using 1000 ultrafast bootstrap (UFBoot2) replicates (Hoang et al. 2018). For Bayesian analysis (BI), MrBayes version 3.2.7 (Ronquist et al. 2012) was utilised to evaluate posterior probabilities (PP) using Markov Chain Monte Carlo sampling (MCMC). MrMTgui (Nuin 2007), combined with MrModelTest and Paup, was utilised to determine the best-fit evolution model for each locus using the Akaike Information Criterion (AIC). BI was conducted with six simultaneous MCMC chains, and trees were sampled every 100th generation. The analyses were stopped after 5,000,000 generations when the average standard deviations of the split frequencies were below 0.01. The first 25% of the resulting trees were discarded as burn-in and PP was calculated from the remaining sampled trees. The phylogenetic tree was visualised using FigTree version 1.4.0 (http://tree.bio.ed.ac.uk/software/figtree/).

Taxon treatment

Papiliomyces longiclavatus Y. Zhang, Y.P. Xiao & T.C. Wen, sp. nov.

Materials   Download as CSV 
Holotype:
  1. scientificName:
    Papiliomyces longiclavatus
    ; country:
    China
    ; stateProvince:
    Guizhou
    ; county:
    Guiyang City
    ; locality:
    Yangchang Town
    ; verbatimElevation:
    1303 m
    ; verbatimCoordinates:
    26°50′12.23″N, 106°53′41.58″E
    ; decimalLatitude:
    0.836731
    ; decimalLongitude:
    106.894883
    ; georeferenceProtocol:
    label
    ; eventDate:
    14 June 2020
    ; lifeStage:
    sexualMorph
    ; catalogNumber:
    GACP YC20061403
    ; recordedBy:
    Yan Zhang
    ; identifiedBy:
    Yuan-pin Xiao
    ; dateIdentified:
    2020
    ; occurrenceID:
    94F0EF70-F2D9-5663-BB82-44C056D5B97A; ex-type: GZUCC-1403
Paratype:
  1. scientificName:
    Papiliomyces longiclavatus
    ; country:
    China
    ; stateProvince:
    Guizhou
    ; county:
    Guiyang City
    ; locality:
    Yangchang Town
    ; verbatimElevation:
    1325.7 m
    ; verbatimCoordinates:
    26°50′12.03″N, 106°53′41.70″E
    ; decimalLatitude:
    0.836675
    ; decimalLongitude:
    106.894917
    ; georeferenceProtocol:
    label
    ; eventDate:
    14 June 2020
    ; lifeStage:
    sexualMorph
    ; catalogNumber:
    HKAS 115914
    ; recordedBy:
    Yan Zhang
    ; identifiedBy:
    Yuanpin Xiao
    ; dateIdentified:
    2020
    ; occurrenceID:
    BA6BD204-6AB6-58CF-9EA3-850CB1357663

Description

Facesoffungi number: FoF 10474

Sexual morph (Fig. 1): Host: a bat moth larva (Lepidoptera, Hepialidae), 3.5–4.8 cm long, greyish to light yellow. Stromata: 4–6 cm long, 0.3–0.5 cm wide, arising from the head of host, clavate, solitary. Stipe: cylindrical, greyish to light yellow, fleshy, glabrous, enlarging abruptly at fertile portion. Fertile head: 1.5–2.1 cm long, 0.4–0.6 cm wide, grey white to dark grey, different from the stipe, without sterile tip. Ascomata: 320–580 × 110–230 μm (442 × 186 μm, n = 30), flask-shaped, immersed. Asci: 140–230 × 5–7 μm (183 × 6 μm, n = 30), narrowly cylindrical, 8-spored, hyaline, with a thick apical cap. Apical cap: 5–7 μm (6 μm, n = 30). Ascospores as long as asci, hyaline, filiform, smooth, irregularly breaking into secondary spores. Secondary spores: 2–9 × 1–2 μm (5.5 × 1.5 μm, n = 30), cylindrical, hyaline, irregular length.

Figure 1.  

Papiliomyces longiclavatus (GACP YC20064103), sexual morph. a Habitat; b Overview of the host and stroma; c Stroma; d Host; e, f Vertical section of the stroma; g, h Immature to mature asci; i Apical cap; j, k Part of ascospores; l, m Secondary spores. Scale bars: b = 3 cm, c = 1 cm, d = 1 cm, e = 0.1 cm, f = 400 μm, g = 150 μm, h–j = 100 μm, k = 50 μm, l, m = 5 μm.

Asexual morph (Fig. 2): Colonies on Czapek agar: attaining a diameter of 2–3 cm within 14 d at 25°C, dense, flat, velvety, white. α-phialides: 13–24 × 1–2 μm (18 × 1.5 μm, n = 30), hyaline, Hirsutella-like smooth, solitary, mostly arising from aerial hyphae, slender, with a short neck. β-phalides: 28–45 × 1–2 μm (36 × 1.5 μm, n = 30), hyaline, smooth, slender, Acremonium-like, mostly solitary. α-conidia: 3–5 × 1–3 μm (4.5 μm, n = 30), subglobose, one-celled, smooth, hyaline. β-conidia: 6–10 × 1–3 μm (8 × 2 μm, n = 30), fusiform, with both ends sharp, one-celled, smooth.

Figure 2.  

Papiliomyces longiclavatus (ex-type: GZUCC-4103), asexual morph. a Upper side of the culture; b Reverse of the culture; c Mycelium with phialides and conidia; d, f α-phialides; e, g β-phialides; h Two types of conidia; i β-conidia; j α-conidia. Scale bars: a, b = 1 cm, c = 30 μm, d–g = 20 μm, h–j = 5 μm.

Host: On larvae of a bat moth (Lepidoptera, Hepialidae) living in soil.

Etymology

Referring to the shape of the stroma.

Distribution

Thus far only known from China.

Analysis

Phylogeny

Ten taxa (two with new sequence data) were included in the combined ITS, SSU, TEF-1α, RPB1, LSU and RPB2 dataset (Table 1), which included 5016 characters with gaps: 561 characters for ITS, 887 for LSU, 1040 for SSU, 655 for RPB1, 957 for RPB2 and 916 for TEF-1α. The IQ-TREE analysis had the same topology as the Bayesian analysis. The ML tree with the highest likelihood value, -9176.099, is presented. The matrix contained 280 unique alignment patterns, including 289 parsimony-informative, 133 singleton sites and 4594 constant sites. For the IQ-Tree, the respective partition best-fit models were: JC+I for SSU and RPB2, TNe for LSU, K2P for ITS, TN+F for TEF-1α and K2P+I for RPB1. In the Bayesian analysis, the respective partition best-fit models were: F81+I for SSU, GTR for LSU and TEF-1α, K80+G for ITS and RPB1 and SYM for RPB2.

Table 1.
Download as
CSV
XLSX

List of taxa and their GenBank accession numbers used in this study.

Species

Strains

Locality

Substrate

SSU

LSU

TEF-1α

RPB1

RPB2

ITS

References

Keithomyces carneus

CBS 399.59

USA

Soil

EF468989

EF468842

EF468788

EF468895

EF468939

MT078887

Spatafora et al. (2007)

Keithomyces carneus

CBS 239.32

France

Sand dune

EF468988

EF468843

EF468789

EF468894

EF468938

AY624171

Spatafora et al. (2007)

Paecilomyces sp.

HR1-11

South

Korea

Cymbidium kanran

KU141150

Hong,J.W et al. (2015)

Paecilomyces sp.

SC0924

China

Soil

KR011745

Xu et al. (2015)

Paecilomyces verticillatus

DQ836182

Han et al. (2006)

Papiliomyces liangshanensis

EFCC 1523

Korea

Lepidoptera

EF468961

EF468814

EF468755

–

EF468918

–

Sung et al. (2007)

Papiliomyces liangshanensis

EFCC 1452

Korea

Lepidoptera

EF468962

EF468815

EF468756

–

–

–

Sung et al. (2007)

Papiliomyces longiclavatus

GZUH

YC20061403

China

Lepidopteran larva

MZ702112

MZ702101

MZ955880

MZ955876

OM419142

MZ702080

This study

Papiliomyces longiclavatus

HKAS 115914

China

Lepidoptera larva

MZ702114

MZ702103

MZ955882

MZ955878

OM419143

MZ702082

This study

Papiliomyces shibinensis

GZUH

SB13050311

China

Lepidoptera

KR153588

–

KR153589

KR153590

–

–

Wen et al. (2015)

Discussion

Using morphological and phylogenetic analyses, we propose Papiliomyces longiclavatus sp. nov. from China. It shares a close relationship with Papiliomyces liangshanensis (EFCC 1452, EFCC 1523, Sung et al. (2007), Mongkolsamrit et al. (2020)), Papiliomyces shibinensis (Wen et al. 2015) and Paecilomyces verticillatus (Li et al. 2006). Papiliomyces liangshanensis was reclassified as Ophiocordyceps liangshanensis after morphological and phylogenetic analyses (Wang et al. 2021). However, the Nepalese collections (EFCC 1452, EFCC 1523) are lacking a morphological description (Sung et al. 2007) and which are named Papiliomyces liangshanensis. These two collection groups place our new species within the same clade (Fig. 3).

Figure 3.  

Phylogram of Papiliomyces longiclavatus generated from the Maximum Likelihood (IQ-tree) analysis of combined ITS, SSU, TEF-1α, RPB1, LSU and RPB2 sequence data. The tree was rooted to Keithomyces carneus (CBS 399.59) and Keithomyces carneus (CBS 239.32). Maximum Likelihood bootstrap values greater than 75% and posterior probabilities from Bayesian Inference more than 0.95 were indicated above the nodes. The new species is indicated in red.

Phylogenetically, they are different from Papiliomyces liangshanensis (EFCC 1452, EFCC 1523): 0 bp in ITS, 0 bp in LSU, 4 bp/762 bp (99%) in TEF and 7 bp/762 bp (99%) in RPB2. However, the Nepalese collections (EFCC 1452, EFCC 1523) lack morphological descriptions (Sung et al. 2007) and which was then named Papiliomyces liangshanensis. Consequently, we indicated these two collections on the phylogenetic tree. These two collections, EFCC 1452 and EFCC 1523, require information about detection and morphology.

Furthermore, Papiliomyces longiclavatus is similar to Papiliomyces shibinensis in that it has clavate stromata with cylindrical stipe, immersed perithecia and filiform ascospores. However, it differs from Papiliomyces shibinensis in that it produces longer ascospores, cylindrical secondary ascospores, two types of phialides and two types of conidia (Table 2). It differs from Paecilomyces verticillatus in that it produces longer phialides, longer α-conidia and longer β-conidia. In the phylogenetic tree, Papiliomyces longiclavatus is distinct from Papiliomyces shibinensis and Paecilomyces verticillatus, which cluster in different clades (Fig. 3). Thus, Papiliomyces longiclavatus is a distinct Papiliomyces species (Table 2).

Table 2.
Download as
CSV
XLSX

Synopsis of Papiliomyces species discussed in the paper.

Species

Papiliomyces shibinensis

Paecilomyces verticillatus

Papiliomyces longiclavatus

Stromata

Stromata 42 mm long, 2–3 mm wide, growing from the head of Lepidoptera larva, simple.

Stromata arising from the head of host, ovary, clavate, solitary, 40–60 mm long, 3–5 mm thick.

Stipe

Stipe 17–20 mm long, 2–3 mm wide, flexuous, white to faint yellow.

Stipe cylindrical, greyish-white to light yellow, fleshy, glabrous, enlarging abruptly at fertile portion.

Fertile part

Fertile part on the upper 50% of the stromata, 18–22 mm long, 2–3 mm wide, cylindrical or obtuse, faint yellow, differentiated from stipe, without a sterile apex.

Fertile head length 15–21 mm, 4–6 mm thick, grey white to grey black, mature with a clear boundary with the stalk, no sterile tip.

Perithecia

Ascomata crowded, completely immersed, ampulliform, ovoid to oblong, 630–830 × 240–340 μm, curved, with the ostioles opening on the surface of the fertile head.

Ascomata, bottle-shaped, buried, 320–580×110–230 μm

Asci

Asci 130–200 × 5.1–8.3 μm, 8–spored, hyaline, cylindrical, with a prominent apical cap; apical cap 4.7–5.9 × 2.8–3.5 μm

Asci, narrowly cylindrical, 8-spored, hyaline, possessing a prominent apical cap, 140–230×4.8–6.5 μm

Ascospores

Ascospores 120–170 × 1.4–2.1 μm, hyaline, filiform, smooth–walled, multiseptated with cells 4–5.6 μm long.

Ascospores are nearly isometric, transparent and colourless, slender, filiform, smooth, mature and break into secondary ascospores.

Part–spores

Not breaking into secondary ascospores.

Secondary ascospores, 5.2–9.3 × 1.1–1.5 μm

Condiophores

Conidiophores short, hyaline, smooth, up to 60 µm long, mostly arising from aerial hyphae.

Conidiophores hyaline, 9.6–19.8 µm. Phialides 7.8–14.4 × 1.2–2.4 µm, awl–shaped or consisting of a cylindrical basal portion and a thin neck

Two types of phalides: α–phalides and β–phalides. α–phialides 12.6–23.8 × 1.4–2.4 μm, hyaline, smooth, solitary, mostly arising from aerial hyphae, shorter and gradually thinner upwards. β–phalides 28.2–44.5 × 1.2–1.8 μm hyaline, smooth, slender, conical, mostly solitary.

Conidia

Conidia ellipsoidal, ovoid or fusiform, 1–celled, 3.5–5 × 2–3 µm, in long divergent, dry chains.

Conidia hyaline, mostly subglobose to ellipsoidal, 1.2–1.8 × 0.6–1.2 µm; few fusiform, 1.8–3.0 × 1.8–2.4 µm, forming divergent, dry chains or aggregating spore group

α–conidia.1–5.1×1.2–2.5 μm, round, single celled, smooth, colourless and transparent. β–conidia 5.8–9.9×1.3–2.7 μm, fusiform, with sharp ends, single cell and smooth wall.

Reference

Wen et al. (2015)

Li et al. (2006)

This study

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the Science and Technology Foundation of Guizhou Province (No. [2019]2451-3) and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 31760014). Fengyao Long was thanked for helping to sequence the specimens.The editor and reviewers were appreciated for the positive and constructive comments and suggestions.

References

login to comment