Additions to Italian Pleosporinae, including Italica heraclei sp. nov.

Subodini Wijesinghe; Yong Wang; Laura Zucconi; Monika Dayarathne; Saranyaphat Boonmee; Erio Camporesi; Dhanushka N. Wanasinghe; Kevin D. Hyde

doi:10.3897/BDJ.9.e59648

Biodiversity Data Journal : Taxonomic Paper

Taxonomic Paper

Additions to Italian Pleosporinae, including Italica heraclei sp. nov.

Subodini N. Wijesinghe^‡,§,|, Yong Wang^‡, Laura Zucconi^¶, Monika C. Dayarathne^‡, Saranyaphat Boonmee^§,|, Erio Camporesi^#, Dhanushka N. Wanasinghe^¤,«,», Kevin D. Hyde^§,¤,˄

‡ Department of Plant Pathology, Agriculture College, Guizhou University, Guiyang, Guizhou Province, 550025, China

§ Center of Excellence in Fungal Research, Mae Fah Luang University, Chiang Rai 57100, Thailand

| School of Science, Mae Fah Luang University, Chiang Rai 57100, Thailand

¶ Department of Ecological and Biological Sciences, University of Tuscia, Largo dell'Università snc, 01100, Viterbo, Italy

# A.M.B. Gruppo Micologico Forlivese “Antonio Cicognani”, Via Roma 18, Forlì, Italy

¤ CAS Key Laboratory for Plant Biodiversity and Biogeography of East Asia (KLPB), Kunming Institute of Botany, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Kunming 650201, Yunnan, China

« East and Central Asia Regional Office, World Agroforestry Centre (ICRAF), Kunming 650201, Yunnan, China

» Honghe Center for Mountain Futures, Kunming Institute of Botany, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Honghe County, Yunnan, China

˄ Innovative Institute of Plant Health, Zhongkai University of Agriculture and Enginnering, Haizhu District, Guangzhou 510225, China

Corresponding author: Yong Wang (yongwangbis@aliyun.com)

Academic editor: Danny Haelewaters

Received: 14 Oct 2020 | Accepted: 23 Dec 2020 | Published: 18 Jan 2021

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Citation: Wijesinghe SN, Wang Y, Zucconi L, Dayarathne MC, Boonmee S, Camporesi E, Wanasinghe DN, Hyde KD (2021) Additions to Italian Pleosporinae, including Italica heraclei sp. nov. Biodiversity Data Journal 9: e59648. https://doi.org/10.3897/BDJ.9.e59648

Abstract

Background

In the last few years, many microfungi—including plant-associated species—have been reported from various habitats and substrates in Italy. In this study of pleosporalean fungi, we researched terrestrial habitats in the Provinces of Arezzo (Tuscany region), Forlì-Cesena and Ravenna (Emilia-Romagna region) in Italy.

New information

Our research on Italian pleosporalean fungi resulted in the discovery of a new species, Italica heraclei (Phaeosphaeriaceae). In addition, we present a new host record for Pseudoophiobolus mathieui (Phaeosphaeriaceae) and the second Italian record of Phomatodes nebulosa (Didymellaceae). Species boundaries were defined, based on morphological study and multi-locus phylogenetic reconstructions using Maximum Likelihood and Bayesian Inference analyses. Our findings expand the knowledge on host and distribution ranges of pleosporalean fungi in Italy.

Keywords

one new species, Ascomycota, Dothideomycetes, integrative taxonomy, morphology, phylogeny

Introduction

A number of prominent scholars contributing to the foundation of fungal classification were of Italian origin. Among the most important mycologists of the 19^th century are Giuseppe De Notaris and Pier Andrea Saccardo, who were the earliest mycologists to validate microscopic characteristics as important features in fungal taxonomy (Onofri et al. 1999). Currently, fungal taxonomy benefits from a combination of morphology and DNA-based molecular analyses to resolve species limits (e.g. Alors et al. 2016, Skrede et al. 2017, Haelewaters and De Kesel 2020). In the last few years, a high number of microfungal taxa have been recorded in different Italian habitats (Jensen et al. 2010, Rodolfi et al. 2016,Thambugala et al. 2017,Wanasinghe et al. 2018a, Liu et al. 2019, Marin-Felix et al. 2019, Hyde et al. 2020b). Currently, a database (https://italianmicrofungi.org/) for plant-associated Italian microfungi is being developed with past, present and upcoming studies being added.

The order Pleosporales is amongst the most family-rich ones in Dothideomycetes (Mugambi and Huhndorf 2009, Taylor et al. 2015, Brahmanage et al. 2020), with 91 families and 566 genera (Hongsanan et al. 2020, Wijayawardene et al. 2020). Luttrell (1955) suggested that Pleosporales should contain dothideomycetous species with perithecioid ascomata and pseudoparaphyses amongst the asci. After investigations by Luttrell (1973) and Barr (1983), the Pleosporales order was established by Barr (1987), based on Pleosporaceae with the type species Pleospora herbarum. The order includes taxa characterised by perithecioid ascomata with perithecia that have a papillate apex and ostiole, with or without periphyses, cellular pseudoparaphyses, fissitunicate asci and ascospores with variable pigmentation, septation and shape and usually with bipolar asymmetry (Barr 1987, Hyde et al. 2013). In this study, we investigated three fungal taxa in pleosporalean families, two taxa belonging to Phaeosphaeriaceae and one to Didymellaceae.

Phaeosphaeriaceae was introduced by Barr (1979). The family was typified by Phaeosphaeria and P. oryzae is the type species (Hongsanan et al. 2020). Members of this family can be saprotrophic, endophytic, pathogenic on economically-important plants and crops and hyper-parasitic on living plants and humans (Kirk et al. 2010, Bakhshi et al. 2019, Phookamsak et al. 2014, Senanayake et al. 2018, Roels et al. 2020). Phaeosphaeriaceous species associated with monocotyledons have been often described as having small to medium-sized ascomata and septate, ellipsoidal to fusiform or filiform ascospores (Zhang et al. 2012, Hyde et al. 2013, Hyde et al. 2016). Some species of Phaeosphaeriaceae have been recorded from dicotyledonous plants (Ariyawansa et al. 2015a, Hyde et al. 2016, Hyde et al. 2020b, Brahmanage et al. 2020).

Didymellaceae is another family in Pleosporales introduced by De Gruyter et al. (2009) to accommodate Ascochyta, Didymella (type), Phoma and Phoma-like species (Chen et al. 2015, Chen et al. 2017, Hongsanan et al. 2020). It is a species-rich family containing numerous plant pathogenic, saprotrophic and endophytic species associated with a wide range of hosts (Aveskamp et al. 2008, Aveskamp et al. 2010, Wanasinghe et al. 2018a, Hou et al. 2020). Species of Didymellaceae are cosmopolitan and have been reported from inorganic materials, water, air, soil and different environments, such as deep-sea sediments, deserts and karst caves (Wanasinghe et al. 2018a, Hongsanan et al. 2020, Hou et al. 2020).

Currently, a total of 83 and 35 genera are accounted for Phaeosphaeriaceae and Didymellaceae, respectively (Hongsanan et al. 2020, Wijayawardene et al. 2020). New additions of phaeosphaeriaceous and didymellaceous species have been recorded from Italian localities in the last few years, from multiple hosts, substrates and geographical locations (Ariyawansa et al. 2015b, Marin-Felix et al. 2019, Farr and Rossman 2020). Here, we present the characterisation of three fungal strains isolated from dead attached stems of different dicotyledon hosts collected in Italy.

Materials and methods

Sample collection, morphological studies and specimen deposition

Strains were isolated from dead stems of different host plants belonging to Apiaceae, Asteraceae and Urticaceae (dicotyledons) collected in the Provinces of Arezzo, Forlì-Cesena and Ravenna (Italy) from September to December 2018. Samples were preserved in sterile Ziploc bags in the laboratory at 18°C. Macromorphological characters of the samples were observed using a Motic SMZ 168 compound stereomicroscope and micromorphology was examined from hand-sectioned structures using a Nikon ECLIPSE 80i compound stereomicroscope, equipped with a Canon 600D digital camera. The measurements of photomicrographs were obtained using Tarosoft (R) Image Frame Work version 0.9.7. Images were edited with Adobe Photoshop CS6 Extended version 13.0.1 software (Adobe Systems, San Jose, California).

Single-spore isolation was carried out as described by Chomnunti et al. (2014). Germinated spores were aseptically transferred into fresh potato dextrose agar medium (PDA, Merck KGaA of Darmstadt, Germany). Culture plates were incubated at 18°C for six weeks and inspected every week. Herbarium specimens are preserved at Mae Fah Luang University Herbarium (MFLU) in Chiang Rai, Thailand. All living cultures are deposited at Mae Fah Luang Culture Collection (MFLUCC). Facesoffungi and Index Fungorum numbers for new taxa were obtained (Jayasiri et al. 2015, Index Fungorum 2020).

The administrative boundaries of Italy and geocodes for collecting sites related to our newly-isolated species were mapped by using QGIS version 3.14 (QGIS Geographic Information System, Open Source Geospatial Foundation Project. http://qgis.org/). Geocodes of collecting locations were confirmed with GoogleEarthPro version 7.3.3 (the data providers were: Image Landsat/Copernicus, Data SIO, NOAA, US. Navy, NGA, GEBCO, US Dept. of State Geographer, https://www.google.com/earth/). The data files (.cvs and .shp) for administrative boundaries were downloaded from DIVA-GIS for mapping and geographic data analysis (Hijmans et al. 2001, https://www.diva-gis.org/).

DNA extraction, PCR amplification, sequencing and molecular analyses

The methodology for DNA extraction, PCR, gel electrophoresis and sequencing was followed, as detailed in Dissanayake et al. (2020). The genomic DNA was extracted from fresh mycelium using EZgeneTM Fungal gDNA extraction Kit GD2416 (Biomiga, Shanghai, China), following the guidelines of the manufacturer. DNA sequences were obtained for the internal transcribed spacer region (ITS1, 5.8S, ITS2), the small subunit (SSU) and large subunit (LSU) of the nuclear ribosomal RNA gene, translation elongation factor 1-α (TEF) and β-Tubulin (TUB2). PCR thermal cycle programmes for each locus region are presented in Table 1. Purification and sequencing were outsourced to the SinoGenoMax Sanger sequencing laboratory (Beijing, China). Newly-generated sequences were submitted to NCBI GenBank (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/genbank/).

Table 1.

Download as

CSV

XLSX

Gene regions, primers and PCR thermal cycle programmes used in this study, with corresponding reference(s).

Genes/loci	PCR primers (forward/reverse)	PCR conditions	Reference(s)
ITS and LSU	ITS5/ITS4 and LR0R/LR5	94°C; 2 min (95°C; 30 s, 55°C; 50 s, 72°C; 90 s) × 35 thermal cycles, 72°C; 10 min.	White et al. (1990), Vilgalys and Hester (1990), Hopple (1994), Rehner and Samuels (1994)
SSU	NS1/NS4	95°C; 3 min (95°C; 30 s, 55°C; 50 s, 72°C; 30 s) × 35 thermal cycles, 72°C; 10 min.	White et al. (1990)
TEF	EF1-983F/EF1-2218R	94°C; 2 min (95°C; 30 s, 58°C; 50 s, 72°C; 1 min), × 35 thermal cycles, 72°C; 10 min.	Rehner (2001)
TUB2	Bt2a/Bt2b	94°C; 2 min (94°C; 1 min, 58°C; 1 min, 72°C; 90 s), × 35 thermal cycles, 72°C; 10 min.	Glass and Donaldson (1995)

Contig sequences were checked with BLAST searches in NCBI for primary identifications. Sequences for phylogenetic analyses were downloaded from GenBank following Hyde et al. (2020b). Single and multiple alignments were generated with MAFFT version 7 (Katoh and Standley 2013, Katoh et al. 2019). When manual improvement was needed, BioEdit version 7.0.5.2 software was used (Hall 1999). Two separate phylogenetic analyses were conducted: Maximum Likelihood (ML) and Bayesian Inference (BI). The following concatenated datasets were analysed: for Didymellaceae: ITS, LSU, RPB2, TUB2; for Phaeosphaeriaceae: SSU, ITS, LSU, TEF (sensu Hyde et al. 2020b).

Phylogenetic analyses were run on the CIPRES Science Gateway portal (Miller et al. 2012). ML trees were generated for the final concatenated alignment by using RAxML-HPC2 on XSEDE (v. 8.2.10) tool (Stamatakis 2014) under the GTR+GAMMA substitution model. Bootstrapping was done with 1,000 replicates. For BI, MrModeltest version 2.3 (Nylander 2004) was run under the Akaike Information Criterion implemented in PAUP version 4.0b10 (Swofford 2003) to estimate the best evolutionary model, resulting in GTR+I+G as the best-fit model for each locus. The BI analysis was computed with MrBayes version 3.2.6 (Ronquist et al. 2012). Six simultaneous Markov chains were run for 3,000,000 generations (Didymellaceae) or 2,000,000 generations (Phaeosphaeriaceae). Trees were sampled every 1000 generations, ending the run automatically when the standard deviation of split frequencies dropped below 0.01. Phylogenetic trees were visualised with FigTree version 1.4.0 (Rambaut 2012) and edited in Microsoft PowerPoint (2016). The final alignments and trees were deposited in TreeBASE, with submission ID 27224 for Didymellaceae (http://purl.org/phylo/treebase/phylows/study/TB2:S27224) and submission ID 27225 for Phaeosphaeriaceae (http://purl.org/phylo/treebase/phylows/study/TB2:S27225).

Phylogenetic analyses

For the phylogenetic analysis of Phaeosphaeriaceae, Tintelnotia destructants (CBS 127737) and T. opuntiae (CBS 376.91) were selected as outgroup taxa. The dataset comprised 52 taxa, including our new isolates. The final concatenated dataset comprised 3307 characters including gaps. ML and BI analyses resulted in similar tree topologies. The final RAxML tree is shown in Fig. 1 (-lnL = 13938.841645). For the BI analysis, 20% of generations were discarded, resulting in 1583 remaining trees, from which 50% consensus trees and Posterior Probabilities (PP) were calculated.

Figure 1.

Phylogeny of the family Phaeosphaeriaceae, reconstructed from the combined SSU–ITS–LSU–TEF dataset. Tintelnotia destructants (CBS 127737) and T. opuntiae (CBS 376.91) serve as outgroup taxa. ML ≥ 70 and PP ≥ 0.95 are presented above each node. The new isolates are indicated in bold; ^T = type strains. The scale bar represents the expected number of nucleotide substitutions per site.

In our phylogenetic analyses, the new species Italica heraclei (MFLUCC 20-0227) formed a phylogenetically-distinct lineage with high support (82 ML/0.98 PP) (Clade B, Fig. 1), within genus Italica. The generic placements of related Italica species were similar to the analysis performed by Hyde et al. (2020b). In addition, our Italian isolate of Pseudoophiobolus mathieui (MFLUCC 20-0150) and the ex-type strain of P. mathieui (MFLUCC 17-1785) clustered together with high support (98 ML/1.00 PP) (Clade A, Fig. 1). Pseudoophiobolus mathieui was placed sister to Pseudoophiobolus italica, similar to the phylogenetic analysis performed by Phookamsak et al. (2017).

For Didymellaceae, Leptosphaeria conoidea (CBS 616.75) and L. doliolum (CBS 505.75) were selected as outgroup taxa. The concatenated ITS–LSU–RPB2–TUB2 dataset comprised 55 taxa, including our new isolates. The final dataset comprised 2154 characters including gaps. ML and BI analyses resulted in similar tree topologies. The final RAxML tree is shown in Fig. 2 (-lnL = 6261.962009). For the BI analysis, 20% of generations were discarded, resulting in 2401 remaining trees, from which 50% consensus trees and PP were calculated.

Figure 2.

Phylogeny of the family Didymellaceae, reconstructed from the combined ITS–LSU–RPB2–TUB2 dataset. Leptosphaeria conoidea (CBS 616.75) and L. doliolum (CBS 505.75) serve as outgroup taxa. ML ≥ 70 and PP ≥ 0.95 are presented above each node. The new isolate is indicated in bold; ^T = type strains. The scale bar represents the expected number of nucleotide substitutions per site.

In our phylogenetic analyses, the newly-isolated Italian strain MFLUCC 20-0155 was grouped in Phomatodes (Clade A, Fig. 2), with high support values (99 ML/1.00 PP) with other strains of Phomatodes nebulosa: CBS 117.93, CBS 740.96, CBS 100191 and MFLU 18-0177. This, combined with the morphological study (below), confirmed the identity of our isolate as Phomatodes nebulosa.

Data resources

Taxon treatments

Italica heraclei Wijes., Yong Wang bis, Camporesi & K.D. Hyde, sp. nov.

IndexFungorum IF 557859
Facesoffungi number FoF 09223

Materials Download as CSV

Holotype:

scientificName:
Italica heraclei Wijes., Yong Wang bis, Camporesi & K.D. Hyde, sp. nov.
; kingdom:
Fungi
; phylum:
Ascomycota
; class:
Dothideomycetes
; order:
Pleosporales
; family:
Phaeosphaeriaceae
; taxonRank:
species
; genus:
Italica
; specificEpithet:
heraclei
; stateProvince:
Province of Forlì-Cesena [FC]
; county:
Italy
; municipality:
near Ranchio
; year:
2018
; month:
09
; day:
10
; habitat:
on a dead aboveground stem of Heracleum sphondylium (Apiales, Apiaceae)
; fieldNotes:
Terrestrial
; recordedBy:
Erio Camporesi
; identifiedBy:
S.N. Wijesinghe
; institutionID:
MFLU 18-1906
; institutionCode:
Mae Fah Luang University Herbarium (MFLU)
; ownerInstitutionCode:
IT 4028

Other material:

type:
ex-type living culture
; collectionID:
MFLUCC 20-0227
; collectionCode:
Mae Fah Luang Culture Collection (MFLUCC)

Description

Saprobic on dead aboveground stem of Heracleum sphondylium L. (Apiales, Apiaceae). Sexual morph: Ascomata (Fig. 3a-c) 250–280 × 230–250 µm (x̄ = 257 × 237 µm, n = 10), immersed to erumpent, solitary scattered, sessile, globose to subglobose, uniloculate, dark brown to black, coriaceous, ostiolate. Ostiole (Fig. 3c) papillate, 70–85 µm long, 80–100 µm wide, central, comprising blackish-brown to pale brown or hyaline cells. Peridium (Fig. 3d) 10–25 µm (x̄ = 16 µm, n = 15) wide, thin-walled, composed of 4–6 cell layers, outermost layers heavily pigmented, comprising dark brown to pale brown cells of textura angularis. Hamathecium comprising numerous, 2–3 µm wide (x̄ = 2.5 µm, n = 10), filamentous, branched pseudoparaphyses (Fig. 3e) with distinct septa. Asci (Fig. 3f-k) 80–120 × 8–9 µm (x̄ = 100 × 8.5 µm, n = 10), 8-spored, bitunicate, fissitunicate, cylindrical, apically rounded with thick-walled, minute ocular chamber, short pedicellate. Ascospores (Fig. 3l-n) 13–22 × 4–5.5 µm (x̄ = 18 × 5 µm, n = 30), overlapping, uniseriate, ellipsoidal to subcylindrical, 4–6 transversely septate, vertically aseptate, with rounded ends, widest at the middle cell when matured, constricted at the septa, initially hyaline, becoming yellowish-brown at maturity, smooth-walled, mucilaginous sheath absent. Asexual morph: Undetermined.

Figure 3.

Italica heraclei (MFLU 18-1906). a-b. Ascomata on a dead stem of Heracleum sphondylium (Apiales, Apiaceae). c. Section of an ascoma. d. Peridium. e. Pseudoparaphyses. f-j. Asci. k-n. Ascospores. o-p. Colonies on PDA from upper (o) and lower (p) sides. Scale bars: a-b = 200 μm, c = 100 μm, d-j = 20 μm, k-n = 10 μm.

Culture characteristics: Ascospores germinating on MEA (malt extract agar) within 2 days, from single-spore isolation. Colonies (Fig. 3o-p) on PDA reaching 5–10 mm diam. after 28 days at 18°C, circular, entire edge, flat, dense, bright yellow in both upper and lower sides.

GenBank accession numbers (ex-MFLU 18-1906^T): SSU = MT881671, ITS = MT881676, LSU = MT881653, TEF = MT901290

Etymology

Etymology: heraclei, referring to the host genus Heracleum from which the strains were isolated.

Notes

Notes: Italica heraclei (holotype MFLU 18-1906) was isolated from a dead aerial stem of Heracleum sphondylium (Apiales, Apiaceae), whereas I. achilleae (MFLUCC 14-0955) and I. luzulae (MFLUCC 14-0932) were previously isolated from Achillea millefolium (Asterales, Asteraceae) and Luzula sp. (Poales, Juncaceae), respectively. The strains of Italica heraclei (MFLUCC 20-0227) and I. achilleae (MFLUCC 14-0955) were collected from the same Province, Forlì-Cesena; Italica luzulae (MFLUCC 14-0932) was collected from Trento Province (Ariyawansa et al. 2015b, Wanasinghe et al. 2018b).

Italica heraclei (MFLUCC 20-0227) shows morphological characters that are typical for the genus, including coriaceous ascomata; filamentous, branched and septate pseudoparaphyses; and hyaline to yellowish-brown ascospores. Italica heraclei differs from other Italica species by its cylindrical asci and vertically aseptate (Fig. 3) and uniseriate-arranged ascospores in asci.

From the comparison of the SSU, ITS, LSU and TEF sequences of I. heraclei (MFLUCC 20-0227) and I. luzulae (MFLUCC 14-0932, type species) strains, we detected 3/949 (0.31%), 67/517 (12.95%), 20/796 (2.51%) and 32/619 (5.16%) differences, respectively. From the comparison of SSU, ITS, LSU and TEF nucleotides of I. heraclei and I. achilleae (MFLUCC 14-0955), we found 1/950 (0.1%), 64/517 (12.37%), 7/796 (1.13%) and 28/619 (4.52%) differences, respectively. According to the results of our integrative taxonomy approach, we described I. heraclei (MFLUCC 20-0227) as a new species.

Pseudoophiobolus mathieui (Westend.) Phookamsak., Wanas., S.K. Huang, Camporesi & K.D. Hyde (2017)

IndexFungorum IF554183
Facesoffungi number FoF 03804

Nomenclature

Basionym: Sphaeria mathieui Westend., Bull. Acad. R. Sci. Belg., Cl. Sci., sér. 2: no. 5 (1859)

Materials Download as CSV

kingdom:
Fungi
; phylum:
Ascomycota
; class:
Dothideomycetes
; order:
Pleosporales
; family:
Phaeosphaeriaceae
; taxonRank:
species
; genus:
Pseudoophiobolus
; specificEpithet:
mathieui
; stateProvince:
Province of Ravenna
; county:
Italy
; municipality:
near Brisighella
; year:
2018
; month:
9
; day:
10
; habitat:
on a dead areail stem of Artemisia sp. (Asterales, Asteraceae)
; fieldNotes:
Terrestrial
; recordedBy:
Erio Camporesi
; identifiedBy:
S.N. Wijesinghe
; institutionID:
MFLU 18-1907
; institutionCode:
Mae Fah Luang University Herbarium (MFLU)
; ownerInstitutionCode:
IT4031
type:
living culture
; collectionID:
MFLUCC 20-0150
; collectionCode:
Mae Fah Luang Culture Collection (MFLUCC)

Description

Saprobic on dead aerial stem of Artemisia sp. (Asterales, Asteraceae). Sexual morph: Ascomata (Fig. 4a-b, c - with ostiole) 170–300 × 140–250 µm (x̄ = 200 × 177 µm, n = 10), solitary, scattered, dark brown to black, semi-immersed to erumpent, sessile, globose to subglobose, uni-loculate, coriaceous, ostiolate and papillate. Papilla (Fig. 4d) 70–150 × 60–120 µm, mammiform to oblong, with a rounded to truncate apex, thick walled, composed of several layers, brown to dark brown cells of textura angularis, ostiole central, single and without periphyses. Peridium (Fig. 4e) 15–35 µm (x̄ = 20 µm, n = 15), brown to black, thick-walled, pseudoparenchymatous cells, composed of 4–6 cell layers, outer layers composed of dark brown loosely packed cells of textura angularis, inner layers composed of light brown to hyaline flattened cells of textura prismatica. Hamathecium comprising numerous, 1.5–2.5 µm wide (x̄ = 2 µm, n = 15), filamentous, distinctly septate, cellular pseudoparaphyses (Fig. 4f) with guttules, slightly constricted at the septa, anastomosing at the apex, embedded in a hyaline gelatinous matrix. Asci (Fig. 4g-j) 100–150 × 6–9 µm (x̄ = 132 × 8 µm, n = 15), 8-spored, bitunicate, fissitunicate, cylindrical to cylindrical-clavate, short furcate pedicel, apically rounded, well-developed ocular chamber. Ascospores (Fig. 4k-m) 120–150 × 2–3 µm (x̄ = 131 × 2.8 µm, n = 25), fasciculate, lying parallel or spiral at the centre, scolecosporous, filiform or filamentous, narrowly rounded towards the ends, slightly swollen at the middle of 4^th or 5^th cell from the apex (Fig. 4n), yellowish to yellowish brown, 15–18 septate and not constricted at the septa, smooth-walled. Asexual morph: Undetermined.

Figure 4.

Pseudoophiobolus mathieui (MFLU 18-1907). a-b. Ascomata on dead host surface of Artemisia sp. (Asterales, Asteraceae). c. Section of an ascoma. d. Close-up of ostiole. e. Peridium. f. Pseudoparaphyses. g-j. Asci. k-m. Ascospores. n. Ascospore with a swollen point (arrow). o-p. Colonies on PDA from upper (o) to lower (p) sides. Scale bars: b, d = 100 μm, c, f = 50 μm, e, g, h, l, m = 20 μm, i, j = 10 μm, n = 5 μm.

Culture characteristics: Ascospores germinating on PDA within 4 days, from single-spore isolation. Colonies (Fig. 4o-p) on PDA reaching 10–15 mm diam. after 14 days at 16°C, circular, entire edge, flat, dense, pale yellow in both upper and lower centres, white at the edges in both sides.

GenBank accession numbers (ex-MFLUCC 20-0150): SSU = MT880290, ITS = MT880294, LSU = MT880292, TEF = MT901292

Notes

Pseudoophiobolus was introduced by Phookamsak et al. (2017) to accommodate Ophiobolus-like taxa, including P. mathieui, characterised by ascospores that are subhyaline to pale yellowish or yellowish, with a swollen cell, lacking terminal appendages and not separating into part spores. Both the new Italian strain (MFLUCC 20-0150) and the previously-isolated ex-type strain of P. mathieui (MFLUCC 17-1785) were collected from the Province of Forlì-Cesena, on Artemisia sp. (Asterales, Asteraceae) and Salvia sp. (Lamiales, Lamiaceae), respectively. Further records were reported for the same Province on Origanum vulgare (Lamiales, Lamiaceae) and Ononis spinosa (Fabales, Fabaceae) (Phookamsak et al. 2017). Characteristics of our material resemble the holotype (Phookamsak et al. 2017). The holotype of P. mathieui (MFLUCC 17-1785) and our newly-isolated strain (MFLUCC 20-0150) were similar in ascomata, ostiole, peridium and asci, but the ascomatal ostiole of MFLUCC 20-0150 was composed of cells of textura angularis, whereas, in MFLUCC 17-1785, the cells were of textura angularis to textura prismatica (Fig. 4).

From a comparison of ITS and LSU sequences between P. mathieui (type) and MFLUCC 20-0150 strain, both were identical. However, seven nucleotide differences (1.13%) were found between the TEF sequences of two strains. Following the integrative taxonomic approach with both morphological data and molecular phylogenetic analyses, we conclude that our new collection is Pseudoophiobolus mathieui and represents a new host record on Artemisia sp. (Asterales, Asteraceae).

Phomatodes nebulosa (Pers.) Qian Chen & L. Cai, Stud. Mycol. 82: 191 (2015)

IndexFungorum IF 814134
Facesoffungi number FoF 06803

Nomenclature

≡ Sphaeria nebulosa Pers., Observ. mycol. (Lipsiae) 2: 69 (1800) [1799]

Materials Download as CSV

namePublishedIn:
Phomatodes nebulosa (Pers.) Qian Chen & L. Cai, Stud. Mycol. 82: 191 (2015)
; kingdom:
Fungi
; phylum:
Ascomycota
; class:
Dothideomycetes
; order:
Pleosporales
; family:
Didymellaceae
; taxonRank:
species
; genus:
Phomatodes
; specificEpithet:
nebulosa
; stateProvince:
Province of Arezzo [AR]
; county:
Italy
; municipality:
near Passo la Calla - Stia
; year:
2018
; month:
December
; day:
3
; habitat:
on a dead and aerial stem of Urtica dioica (Rosales, Urticaceae)
; fieldNotes:
Terrestrial
; recordedBy:
Erio Camporesi
; identifiedBy:
S.N. Wijesinghe
; institutionID:
MFLU 18-2685
; institutionCode:
Mae Fah Luang University Herbarium (MFLU)
; ownerInstitutionCode:
IT 4110
type:
living culture
; collectionID:
MFLUCC 20-0155
; collectionCode:
Mae Fah Luang Culture Collection (MFLUCC)

Description

Saprobic on dead aboveground stem of Urtica dioica L. (Rosales, Urticaceae). Asexual morph: Coelomycetous. Conidiomata (Fig. 5a-c) immersed, raised as black spots on the host surface, pycnidial, 60–70 × 140–170 µm (x̄ = 66.5 × 155 µm, n = 10), solitary, scattered, unilocular, globose or subglobose to irregular. Pycnidial wall (Fig. 5d) pseudoparenchymatous, 3–5-layered, 15–30 µm (x̄ = 25 µm, n = 10) wide, thick walled, the outermost layer comprising dark brown cells of textura angularis, the inner layer comprising pale brown to hyaline cells of textura angularis. Conidiophores reduced to conidiogenous cells. Conidiogenous cells (Fig. 5e-f) 4–5 × 2–4 µm (x̄ = 4.5 × 3.6 µm, n = 5), enteroblastic, phialidic, ampulliform or short cylindrical, determinate, smooth, hyaline. Conidia (Fig. 5g-j) 4–7 × 1–2 µm (x̄ = 5.3 × 1.6 µm, n = 30) ellipsoidal to cylindrical, aseptate, guttulate, smooth-walled, hyaline. Sexual morph: Undetermined.

Figure 5.

Phomatodes nebulosa (MFLU 18-2685). a-b. Conidiomata on a dead stem of Urtica dioica Rosales, Urticaceae). c. Longitudinal section of a conidioma. d. Conidiomatal wall. e-f. Development stages of conidiogenesis. g-j. Conidiospores. k. Germinating conidium. l-m. Colonies on PDA (l upper, m lower). Scale bars: a = 100 μm, c = 50 μm, b, k = 20 μm, d-e = 10 μm, f-j = 5 μm.

Culture characteristics: Conidia germinating on PDA within 24 h, from single-spore isolation. Colonies (Fig. 5l-m) on PDA reaching 5–10 mm diam. after 10 days at 18°C, circular, entire edge, flat, dense, white in both upper and lower sides.

GenBank accession numbers (ex-MFLUCC 20-0155): ITS = MT880293, LSU = MT880295, TUB2 = MT901291

Notes

Phomatodes was introduced by Chen et al. (2015) to accommodate Phoma-like taxa in Didymellaceae. The type species, Phomatodes aubrietiae, is characterised by globose to subglobose pycnidia, ostiolate conidiomata, solitary or confluent, with a 3–5-layered, pigmented pseudoparenchymatous pycnidial wall, phialidic, hyaline, smooth, ampulliform to doliiform conidiogenous cells and cylindrical to allantoid, hyaline, thin-walled, smooth, aseptate, polar guttulate conidia (Chen et al. 2015). The morphology of our material (Fig. 5) agrees with that of the holotype (CBS 100191), with globose to subglobose conidiomata; phialidic, ampulliform conidiogenous cells; and hyaline, aseptate and polar guttulate conidia (5–7 × 1.5–2.5 μm).

From the comparison of ITS, LSU and TUB2 sequences between P. nebulosa (CBS 100191-type) and P. nebulosa (MFLUCC 20-0155), both strains were identical. In our multi-locus phylogenetic analyses, the new isolate (MFLUCC 20-0155) and the ex-type strains of P. nebulosa (CBS 117.93, CBS 740.96, CBS 100191, MFLU 18-0177) clustered together with high support (99 ML/1.00 PP) (Fig. 2).

Early records of Phomatodes nebulosa were reported on Armoracia rusticana (Brassicales, Brassicaceae) and Mercurialis perennis (Malpighiales, Euphorbiaceae) from the Netherlands, Thlaspi arvense (Brassicales, Brassicaceae) from Poland (Chen et al. 2015, Farr and Rossman 2020) and Datisca cannabina (Cucurbitales, Datiscaceae) from Uzbekistan (Gafforov 2017, Farr and Rossman 2020). Our new strain of P. nebulosa from U. dioica was collected from the Province of Arezzo in Italy at higher altitude (296 m a.s.l.), compared to the previous Italian record on the same host, but from the Province of Forlì-Cesena (34 m a.s.l.) (Hyde et al. 2020a). Considering the results of our integrative taxonomic approach, we report this strain as a new record of P. nebulosa, the first for the Province of Arezzo and the second for Italy, widening its geographic distribution in the country.

Identification keys

Analysis

Discussion

The pleosporalean fungal collections in this study originated from terrestrial habitats in the Provinces of Arezzo (Tuscany region), Forlì-Cesena and Ravenna (Emilia-Romagna region) in Italy (Fig. 6). The fungal isolates were associated with hosts in Apiaceae, Asteraceae and Urticaceae, which are economically and ecologically valuable plants (Simpson 2010, Bennett 2011). The expansion of ecological and mycogeographical knowledge, other than the taxonomic knowledge, are prerequisites to understand fungal biology, diversity and conservation. Our new species (Italica heraclei) and the new record (Pseudoophiobolus mathieui) of Phaeosphaeriaceae, reported in this study, led to an expansion of knowledge about the family Phaeosphaeriaceae. Pseudoophiobolus mathieui strain was found on a new host, Artemisia sp. (Asterales, Asteraceae), enlarging the host distribution of this species in Italy. The record of Phomatodes nebulosa (Didymellaceae) for the Province of Forlì-Cesena represents the second record for Italy, widening the geographical range for this species.

Figure 6.

Geographical distribution of newly-isolated species in Italy. a. Administrative boundaries of Italy and collection regions (grey). b. More detailed map of the collection sites within the Provinces of Arezzo (Tuscany) and Ravenna and Forlì-Cesena (Emilia Romagna).

At times, members of these fungal families are able to have pathogenic relationships with different host plants in different environments (Hongsanan et al. 2020). Therefore, the accurate reporting of host-fungal records with their geographical locations is highly recommended to gain a better understanding of emerging plant pathogens (Dugan et al. 2009). In this study, we highlighted the expansion of the taxonomic framework and host-fungal relationships of those studied taxa in different Italian geographic regions. Additionally, we combined morphological data and multi-locus phylogenetic analyses to verify their identities and assess their taxonomic placement amongst other pleosporalean taxa.

Acknowledgements

Y. Wang would like to thank National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 31972222, 31560489), Program of Introducing Talents of Discipline to Universities of China (111 Program, D20023), Talent Project of Guizhou Science and Technology Cooperation Platform ([2017]5788-5, [2019]5641 and [2020]5001), Guizhou Science, Technology Department International Cooperation Basic project ([2018]5806). S.N. Wijesinghe would like to thank Mae Fah Luang University for financial support and S.C. Karunarathne, R.G.U. Jayalal and A.R. Rathnayaka for their precious assistance during this study. Further, S.N. Wijesinghe would like to acknowledge Robert Hijmans and team for offering free access data files in GIS mapping. D.N. Wanasinghe would like to thank the CAS President’s International Fellowship Initiative (PIFI) for funding his postdoctoral research (number 2019PC0008), the National Science Foundation of China and the Chinese Academy of Sciences for financial support under the following grants: 41761144055, 41771063 and Y4ZK111B01. K.D. Hyde would like to thank the Thailand Research Fund (“Impact of climate change on fungal diversity and biogeography in the Greater Mekong Sub-region RDG6130001”).

Author contributions

References

Alors D, Lumbsch HT, Divakar PK, Leavitt SD, Crespo A (2016)

An integrative approach for understanding diversity in the Punctelia rudecta species complex (Parmeliaceae, Ascomycota)

PLoS ONE

e0146537

. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0146537

Ariyawansa HA, Thambugala KM, Manamgoda DS, Jayawardena R, Camporesi E, Boonmee S, Wanasinghe DN, Phookamsak R, Hongsanan S, Singtripop C, Chukeatirote E (2015a)

Towards a natural classification and backbone tree for Pleosporaceae

Fungal Diversity

‑

139

. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13225-015-0323-z

Ariyawansa HA, Hyde KD, Jayasiri SC, Buyck B, Chethana KW, Dai DQ, Dai YC, Daranagama DA, Jayawardena RS, Lcking R, Ghobad-Nejhad M, Niskanen T, Thambugala KM, Voigt K, Zhao RL, Li GJ, Doilom M, Boonmee S, Yang ZL, Cai Q, Cui YY, Bahkali AH, Chen J, Cui BK, Chen YY, Monika CD, Dissanayake AJ, Ekanayaka AH, Hashimoto A, Hongsanan S, Jones EB, Larsson E, Li WJ, Li QR, Liu JK, Luo ZL, Maharachchikumbura SS, Mapook A, McKenzie EH, Norphanphoun C, Konta S, Pang KL, Perera RH, Phookamsak R, Phukhamsakda C, Pinruan U, Randrianjohany E, Singtripop C, Tanaka K, Tian CM, Tibpromma S, Abdel-Wahab MA, Wanasinghe DN, Wijayawardene NN, Zhang JF, Zhang H, Abdel- Aziz FA, Wedin M, Westberg M, Ammirati JF, Bulgakov TS, Lima DX, Callaghan TM, Callac P, Chang CH, Coca LF, Dal-Forno M, Dollhofer V, Fliegerov K, Greiner K, Griffith GW, Ho HM, Hofstetter V, Jeewon R, Kang JC, Wen TC, Kirk PM, Kytvuori I, Lawrey JD, Xing J, Li H, Liu ZY, Liu XZ, Liimatainen K, Lumbsch HT, Matsumura M, Moncada B, Moncada S, Parnmen S, Azevedo Santiago AL, Sommai S, Song Y, Souza CA, Souza-Motta CM, Su HY, Suetrong S, Wang Y, Wei SF, Yuan HS, Zhou LW, Rblov M, Fournier J, Camporesi E, Luangsa-ard JJ, Tasanathai K, Khonsanit A, Thanakitpipattana D, Somrithipol S, Diederich P, Millanes AM, Common RS, Stadler M, Yan JY, Li XH, Lee HW, Nguyen TTT, Lee HB, Battistin E, Marsico O, Vizzini A, Vila J, Ercole E, Eberhardt U, Simonini G, Wen HA, Chen XH (2015b)

Fungal diversity notes 111–252–taxonomic and phylogenetic contributions to fungal taxa

Fungal Diversity

‑

248

. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13225-015-0346-5

Aveskamp MM, Gruyter J, Crous PW (2008)

Biology and recent developments in the systematics of Phoma, a complex genus of major quarantine significance

Fungal Diversity

‑

Aveskamp MM, Gruyter J, Woudenberg JH, Verkley G, Crous PW (2010)

Highlights of the Didymellaceae: A polyphasic approach to characterize Phoma and related pleosporalean genera

Studies in Mycology

‑

. https://doi.org/10.3114/sim.2010.65.01

Bakhshi M, Arzanlou M, Groenewald JZ, Quaedvlieg W, Crous PW (2019)

Parastagonosporella fallopiae gen. et sp. nov. (Phaeosphaeriaceae) on Fallopia convolvulus from Iran

Mycological Progress

203

‑

214

. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11557-018-1428-z

Barr ME (1979)

A classification of ascomycetes

Mycologia

935

‑

957

. https://doi.org/10.1080/00275514.1979.12021099

Barr ME (1983)

Muriform ascospores in class Ascomycetes

Mycotaxon

149

‑

157

Barr ME (1987)

Prodromus to Class ascomycetes

Department of Botany University of Massachusetts Amherst , Massachusetts 01003

United States of America Hamilton I. Newell, Inc. Amherst, Massachusetts 0100

153

pp. [ISBN

0-934454-51-5

]

Bennett B (2011)

Twenty-five economically important plant families

. In: Bennett B (Ed.)

Encyclopedia of Life Support Systems

Economic Botany

Brahmanage RS, Dayarathne MC, Wanasinghe DN, Thambugala KM, Jeewon R, Samarakoon MC, Sandaruwan D, De Silva NI, Camporesi E, Raza M, Chethana KW, Yan JY, Hyde KD (2020)

Taxonomic novelties of saprobic Pleosporales from selected dicotyledons

Mycosphere

2481

‑

2541

. https://doi.org/10.5943/mycosphere/11/1/15

Chen Q, Jiang Z, GZ C, L C, PW (2015)

Resolving the Phoma enigma

Studies in Mycology

137

‑

217

. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.simyco.2015.10.003

Chen Q, Hou LW, Duan WJ, Crous PW, Cai L (2017)

Didymellaceae revisited

Studies in Mycology

105

‑

159

. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.simyco.2017.06.002

Chomnunti P, Hongsanan S, Hudson BA, Tian Q, Peršoh D, Dhami MK, Alias AS, Xu J, Liu X, Stadler M, Hyde KD (2014)

The sooty moulds

Fungal Diversity

‑

. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13225-014-0278-5

De Gruyter J, Aveskamp MM, Woudenberg JHC, Verkley GJ, Groenewald JZ, Crous PW (2009)

Molecular phylogeny of Phoma and allied anamorph genera: Towards a reclassification of the Phoma complex

Mycological Research

113

508

‑

519

. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mycres.2009.01.002

Dissanayake AJ, Bhunjun CS, Maharachchikumbura SSN, Liu JK (2020)

Applied aspects of methods to infer phylogenetic relationships amongst fungi

Mycosphere

2652

‑

2676

. https://doi.org/10.5943/mycosphere/11/1/18

Dugan FM, Glawe DA, Attanayake RN, Chen W (2009)

The importance of reporting new host-fungus records for ornamental and regional crops

Plant Health Progress

. https://doi.org/10.1094/PHP-2009-0512-01-RV

Farr DF, Rossman AY (2020)

Fungal Databases, U.S. National Fungus Collections, ARS, USDA

. https://nt.ars-grin.gov/fungaldatabases/. Accessed on: 2020-7-20.

Gafforov YS (2017)

A preliminary checklist of Ascomycetous microfungi from southern Uzbekistan

Mycosphere

660

‑

696

. https://doi.org/10.5943/mycosphere/8/4/12

Glass N, Donaldson G (1995)

Development of Primer Sets Designed for Use with the PCR To Amplify Conserved Genes from Filamentous Ascomycetes

Applied and Environmental Microbiology

1323

‑

1330

. https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.61.4.1323-1330.1995

Haelewaters D, De Kesel A (2020)

Checklist of thallus-forming Laboulbeniomycetes from Belgium and the Netherlands, including Hesperomyces halyziae and Laboulbenia quarantenae spp. nov

MycoKeys

‑

. https://doi.org/10.3897/mycokeys.71.53421

Hall T (1999)

BioEdit: A user-friendly biological sequence alignment editor and analysis program for Windows 95/98/NT

Nucleic Acids Symposium Series

‑

Hijmans RJ, Guarino L, Cruz M, Rojas E (2001)

Computer tools for spatial analysis of plant genetic resources data: 1. DIVA-GIS

Plant Genetic Resources Newsletter

127

‑

Hongsanan S, Hyde KD, Phookamsak R, Wanasinghe DN, McKenzie EH, Sarma VV, Boonmee S, Lcking R, Pem D, Bhat JD, Liu N, Tennakoon DS, Karunarathna A, Jiang SH, Jones EB, Phillips AJ, Manawasinghe I, Tibpromma S, Jayasiri SC, Sandamali D, Jayawardena RS, Wijayawardene NN, Ekanayaka AH, Jeewon R, Lu YZ, Dissanayake AJ, Zeng XY, Luo ZL, Tian Q, Phukhamsakda C, Thambugala KM, Dai DQ, Chethana TK, Ertz D, Doilom M, Liu JK, Prez-Ortega S, Suija A, Senwanna C, Wijesinghe SN, Konta S, Niranjan M, Zhang SN, Ariyawansa HA, Jiang HB, Zhang JF, Silva NI, Thiyagaraja V, Zhang H, Bezerra JD, Miranda-Gonzles R, Aptroot A, Kashiwadani H, Harishchandra D, Aluthmuhandiram JV, Abeywickrama PD, Bao DF, Devadatha B, Wu HX, Moon KH, Gueidan C, Schumm F, Bundhun D, Mapook A, Monkai J, Chomnunti P, Samarakoon MC, Suetrong S, Chaiwan N, Dayarathne MC, Jing Y, Rathnayaka AR, Bhunjun CS, Xu JC, Zheng JS, Liu G, Feng Y, Xie N (2020)

Refined families of Dothideomycetes: Dothideomycetidae and Pleosporomycetidae

Mycosphere

1553

‑

2107

. https://doi.org/10.5943/mycosphere/11/1/13

Hopple JS (1994)

Phylogenetic investigations in the genus Coprinus based on morphological and molecular characters

. [

PhD thesis

Duke University

Durham, NC

Hou L, Hernndez-Restrepo M, Groenewald JZ, Cai L, Crous PW (2020)

Citizen science project reveals high diversity in Didymellaceae (Pleosporales, Dothideomycetes)

MycoKeys

‑

. https://doi.org/10.3897/mycokeys.65.47704

Hyde KD, Jones EB, Liu JK, Ariyawansha H, Boehm E, Boonmee S, Braun U, Chomnunti P, Crous P, Dai DQ, Diederich P, Dissanayake A, Doilom M, Doveri F, Hongsanan S, Jayawardena R, Lawrey JD, Li YM, Liu YX, Lcking R, Monkai J, Nelsen MP, Phookamsak R, Muggia L, Pang KL, Senanayake I, Shearer CA, Wijayawardene N, Wu HX, Thambugala M, Suetrong S, Tanaka K, Wikee S, Zhang Y, Hudson BA, Alias SA, Aptroot A, Bahkali AH, Bezerra LJ, Bhat JD, Camporesi E, Chukeatirote E, Hoog SD, Gueidan C, Hawksworth DL, Hirayama K, Kang JC, Knudsen K, Li WJ, Liu ZY, McKenzie EH, Miller AN, Nadeeshan D, Phillip AJ, Mapook A, Raja HA, Tian Q, Zhang M, Scheuer C, Schumm F, Taylor J, Yacharoen S, Tibpromma S, Wang Y, Yan J, Li X (2013)

Families of Dothideomycetes

Fungal Diversity

‑

313

. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13225-013-0263-4

Hyde KD, Hongsanan S, Jeewon R, Bhat DJ, McKenzie EH, Jones EB, Phookamsak R, Ariyawansa HA, Boonmee S, Zhao Q, Abdel-Aziz FA, Abdel-Wahab MA, Banmai S, Chomnunti P, Cui B, Daranagama DA, Das K, Dayarathne MC, Silva NI, Dissanayake AJ, Doilom M, Ekanayaka AH, Gibertoni TB, Goes-Neto A, Huang S, Jayasiri SC, Jayawardena RS, Konta S, Lee HB, Li W, Lin C, Liu J, Lu Y, Luo Z, Manawasinghe I, Manimohan P, Mapook A, Niskanen T, Norphanphoun C, Papizadeh M, Perera RH, Phukhamsakda C, Richter C, de A. Santiago AL, Drechsler-Santos ER, Senanayake IC, Tanaka K (2016)

Fungal diversity notes 367–490: taxonomic and phylogenetic contributions to fungal taxa

Fungal Diversity

‑

270

. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13225-016-0373-x

Hyde KD, Silva NI, Jeewon R, Bhat DJ, Liu NG, Chaiwan N, Tennakoon DS, Boonmee S, Maharachchikumbura SS, Samarakoon MC, Norphanphoun C, Jayasiri SC, Jayawardena RS, Lin CG, Phookamsak R, Jiang HB, Karunarathna A, Manawasinghe IS, Pem D, Zeng XY, Li J, Luo ZL, Doilom M, Abeywickrama PD, Wijesinghe SN, Bandarupalli D, Brahamanage RS, Yang EF, Wanasinghe DN, Senanayake IC, Goonasekara ID, Wei DP, Aluthmuhandiram JV, Dayarathne MC, Marasinghe DS, Li WJ, Huanraluek N, Sysouphanthong P, Dissanayake LS, Dong W, Lumyong S, Karunarathna SC, Jones EB, Al-Sadi AM, Harishchandra D, Sarma VV, Bulgakov TS (2020a)

AJOM new records and collections of fungi: 1–100

Asian Journal of Mycology

‑

294

. https://doi.org/10.5943/ajom/3/1/3

Hyde KD, Dong Y, Phookamsak R, Jeewon R, Bhat DJ, Jones EB, Liu NG, Abeywickrama PD, Mapook A, Wei DP, Perera RH, Manawasinghe IS, Pem D, Bundhun D, Karunarathna A, Ekanayaka AH, Bao DF, Li JF, Samarakoon MC, Chaiwan N, Lin CG, Phutthacharoen K, Zhang SN, Senanayake IC, Goonasekara ID, Thambugala KM, Phukhamsakda C, Tennakoon DS, Jiang HB, Yang J, Zeng M, Huanraluek N, Liu JK, Wijesinghe SN, Tian Q, Tibpromma S, Brahmanage RS, Boonmee S, Huang SK, Thiyagaraja V, Lu YZ, Jayawardena LS, Dong W, Yang EF, Singh SK, Singh SM, Rana S, Lad SS, Anand G, Devadatha B, Niranjan M, Sarma VV, Liimatainen K, Aguirre-Hudson B, Niskanen T, Overall A, Alvarenga RLM, Gibertoni TB, Pliegler WP, Horváth E, Imre A, Alves AL, Santos ACDS, Tiago RV, Bulgakov TS, Wanasinghe DN, Bahkali AH, Doilom M, Elgorban AM, Maharachchikumbura SSN, Rajeshkumar KC, Haelewaters D, Mortimer PE, Zhao Q, Lumyong S, Xu JC, Sheng J (2020b)

Fungal diversity notes 1151–1276: taxonomic and phylogenetic contributions on genera and species of fungal taxa

Fungal Diversity

100

‑

277

. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13225-020-00439-5

Index Fungorum (2020) http://www.indexfungorum.org. Accessed on: 2020-7-20.

Jayasiri SC, Hyde KD, Ariyawansa HA, Bhat DJ, Buyck B, Cai L, Dai YC, Abd-Elsalam KA, Ertz D, Hidayat I, Jeewon R, Jones EB, Bahkali AH, Karunarathna SC, Liu JK, Luangsa-ard JJ, Lumbsch HT, Maharachchikumbura SS, McKenzie EH, Moncalvo JM, Ghobad-Nejhad M, Nilsson H, Pang KL, Pereira OL, Phillips AJ, Rasp O, Rollins AW, Romero AI, Etayo J, Seluk F, Stephenson SL, Suetrong S, Taylor JE, Tsui CK, Vizzini A, Abdel-Wahab MA, Wen TC, Boonmee S, Dai DQ, Daranagama DA, Dissanayake AJ, Ekanayaka AH, Fryar SC, Hongsanan S, Jayawardena RS, Li WJ, Perera RH, Phookamsak R, Silva NI, Thambugala KM, Tian Q, Wijayawardene NN, Zhao RL, Zhao Q, Kang JC, Promputtha I (2015)

The Faces of Fungi database: fungal names linked with morphology, phylogeny and human impacts

Fungal Diversity

‑

. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13225-015-0351-8

Jensen M, Nerat N, Ale-Agha N (2010)

New remarkable records of microfungi from Sardinia (Italy)

Communications in Agricultural and Applied Biological Sciences

675

‑

697

Katoh K, Standley D (2013)

MAFFT multiple sequence alignment software version 7: improvements in performance and usability

Molecular Biology and Evolution

772

‑

780

. https://doi.org/10.1093/molbev/mst010

Katoh K, Rozewicki J, Yamada K (2019)

MAFFT online service: multiple sequence alignment, interactive sequence choice and visualization

Briefings in Bioinformatics

1160

‑

1166

. https://doi.org/10.1093/bib/bbx108

Kirk PM, Cannon PF, Minter DW (2010)

Dictionary of the Fungi

10th

CABI (2008)

Liu F, Bonthond G, Groenewald J.Z, Cai L, Crous PW (2019)

Sporocadaceae, a family of coelomycetous fungi with appendage-bearing conidia

Studies in Mycology

287

‑

415

. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.simyco.2018.11.001

Luttrell ES (1955)

The ascostromatic Ascomycetes

Mycologia

511

‑

532

. https://doi.org/10.1080/00275514.1955.12024473

Luttrell ES (1973)

ascomycetes

. In: Ainsworth GC, Sparrow FK, Sussman AS (Eds)

The fungi, an advanced treatise, a taxonomic review with keys: ascomycetes and fungi imperfecti

Academic, London,

135–219

pp.

Marin-Felix Y, Hernndez-Restrepo M, Iturrieta-Gonzlez I, Garca D, Gen J, Groenewald JZ, Cai L, Chen Q, Quaedvlieg W, Schumacher RK, Taylor PW (2019)

Genera of phytopathogenic fungi: GOPHY 3

Studies in Mycology

‑

124

. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.simyco.2019.05.001

Miller MA, Pfeiffer W, Schwartz T (2012)

The CIPRES science gateway: enabling high-impact science for phylogenetics researchers with limited resources

Proceedings of the 1st Conference of the Extreme Science and Engineering Discovery Environment

Bridging from the extreme to the campus and beyond (XSEDE ’12)

Association for Computing Machinery, USA

1-8

pp. https://doi.org/10.1145/2335755.2335836

Mugambi GK, Huhndorf SM (2009)

Molecular phylogenetics of pleosporales: Melanommataceae and Lophiostomataceae re-circumscribed (Pleosporomycetidae, Dothideomycetes, Ascomycota)

Studies in Mycology

103

‑

121

. https://doi.org/10.3114/sim.2009.64.05

Nylander JA (2004)

MrModeltest 2.0. Program distributed by the author

Evolutionary Biology Centre, Uppsala University

Onofri S, Graniti A, Zucconi L (Eds) (1999)

Italians in the History of Mycology

Proceedings of a Symposium held in the Archivio Centrale dello Stato

Rome

4–5 October, 1995

Mycotaxon Ltd

163

pp.

Phookamsak R, Liu JK, McKenzie EH, Manamgoda DS, Ariyawansa H, Thambugala KM, Dai DQ, Camporesi E, Chukeatirote E, Wijayawardene NN, Bahkali AH, Mortimer PE, Xu JC, Hyde KD (2014)

Revision of Phaeosphaeriaceae

Fungal Diversity

159

‑

238

. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13225-014-0308-3

Phookamsak R, Wanasinghe DN, Hongsanan S, Phukhamsakda C, Huang SK, Tennakoon DS, Norphanphoun C, Camporesi E, Bulgakov TS, Promputa I, Mortimer PE, Xu JC (2017)

Towards a natural classification of Ophiobolus and ophiobolus-like taxa; introducing three novel genera Ophiobolopsis, Paraophiobolus and Pseudoophiobolus in Phaeosphaeriaceae (Pleosporales)

Fungal Diversity

299

‑

339

. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13225-017-0393-1

Rambaut A (2012)

FigTree v. 1.4.0

. http://tree.bio.ed.ac.uk/ software/figtree/. Accessed on: 2020-5-13.

Rehner S (2001)

Primers for elongation factor 1-α (EF1-α)

. URL: http://ocid.NACSE.ORG/research/deephyphae/EF1primer.pdf

Rehner SA, Samuels GJ (1994)

Taxonomy and phylogeny of Gliocladium analyzed from nuclear large subunit ribosomal DNA sequences

Mycological Research

625

‑

634

. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0953-7562(09)80409-7

Rodolfi M, Longa CM, Pertot I, Tosi S, Savino E, Guglielminetti M, Altobelli E, Del Frate G, Picco AM (2016)

Fungal biodiversity in the periglacial soil of Dosdè Glacier (Valtellina, Northern Italy)

Journal of Basic Microbiology

263

‑

274

. https://doi.org/10.1002/jobm.201500392

Roels D, Coorevits L, Lagrou K (2020)

Tintelnotia destructans as an emerging opportunistic pathogen: First case of T. destructans superinfection in herpetic keratitis

American Journal of Ophthalmology Case Reports

p.100791

. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajoc.2020.100791

Ronquist F, Teslenko M, Van Der Mark P, Ayres DL, Darling A, Höhna S, Larget B, Liu L, Suchard MA, Huelsenbeck JP (2012)

MrBayes 3.2: efficient Bayesian phylogenetic inference and model choice across a large model space

Systematic Biology

539

‑

542

. https://doi.org/10.1093/sysbio/sys029

Senanayake IC, Jeewon R, Camporesi E, Hyde KD, Zeng YJ, Tian SL, Xie N (2018)

Sulcispora supratumida sp. nov. (Phaeosphaeriaceae, Pleosporales) on Anthoxanthum odoratum from Italy

MycoKeys

. https://doi.org/10.3897/mycokeys.38.27729

Simpson MG (2010)

Diversity and classification of flowering plants: eudicots. Plant Systematics

2nd Edition

Academic Press

San Diego

752

pp. [ISBN

9780123743800

] https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-374380-0.50008-7

Skrede I, Carlsen T, Schumacher T (2017)

A synopsis of the saddle fungi (Helvella: Ascomycota) in Europe – species delimitation, taxonomy and typification

Persoonia

201

‑

253

. https://doi.org/10.3767/persoonia.2017.39.09

Stamatakis A (2014)

RAxML Version 8: A tool for phylogenetic analysis and post-analysis of large phylogenies

Bioinformatics

1312

‑

1313

. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btu033

Swofford DL (2003)

PAUP* 4.0b10: phylogenetic analysis using parsimony (*and other methods)

Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, Massachusetts

Taylor T, Krings M, Taylor EL (2015)

Fossil Fungi

Elsevier

373

pp. [ISBN

978-0-12-387731-4

]

Thambugala KM, Daranagama DA, Phillips AJ, Bulgakov TS, Bhat DJ, Camporesi E, Bahkali AH, Eungwanichayapant PD, Liu ZY, Hyde KD (2017)

Microfungi on Tamarix

Fungal Diversity

239

‑

306

. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13225-016-0371-z

Vilgalys R, Hester M (1990)

Rapid genetic identification and mapping of enzymatically amplified ribosomal DNA from several Cryptococcus species

Journal of Bacteriology

172

4238

‑

4246

. https://doi.org/10.1128/jb.172.8.4238-4246.1990

Wanasinghe DN, Jeewon R, Peroh D, Jones EB, Camporesi E, Bulgakov TS, Gafforov YS, Hyde KD (2018a)

Taxonomic circumscription and phylogenetics of novel didymellaceous taxa with brown muriform spores

Studies in Fungi

152

‑

175

. https://doi.org/10.5943/sif/3/1/17

Wanasinghe DN, Phukhamsakda C, Hyde KD, Jeewon R, Lee HB, Jones EB, Tibpromma S, Tennakoon DS, Dissanayake AJ, Jayasiri SC, Gafforov Y, Camporesi E, Bulgakov TS, Ekanayake AH, Perera RH, Samarakoon MC, Goonasekara ID, Mapook A, Li WJ, Senanayake IC, Li JF, Norphanphoun C, Doilom M, Bahkali AH, Xu JC, Mortimer PE, Tibell L, Tibell S, Karunarathna SC (2018b)

Fungal diversity notes 709–839: taxonomic and phylogenetic contributions to fungal taxa with an emphasis on fungi on Rosaceae

Fungal Diversity

‑

236

. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13225-018-0395-7

White TJ, Bruns T, Lee S, Taylor J (1990)

Amplification and direct sequencing of fungal ribosomal RNA genes for phylogenies

. In: Innis MA, Gelfand DH, Sninsky JJ, White TJ (Eds)

PCR protocols: a guide to methods and applications

Academic Press, San Diego

315–322

pp. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-372180-8.50042-1

Wijayawardene NN, Hyde KD, Al-Ani LK, Tedersoo L, Haelewaters D, Rajeshkumar KC, Zhao RL, Aptroot A, Leontyev DV, Saxena RK, Tokarev YS, Dai DQ, Letcher PM, Stephenson SL, Ertz D, Lumbsch HT, Kukwa M, Issi IV, Madrid H, Phillips AJL, Selbmann L, Pfliegler WP, Horváth E, Bensch K, Kirk P, Kolaříková Z, Raja HA, Radek R, Papp V, Dima B, Ma J, Malosso E, Takamatsu S, Rambold G, Gannibal PB, Triebel D, Gautam AK, Avasthi S, Suetrong S, Timdal E, Fryar SC, G D, Réblová M, Doilom M, Dolatabadi S, Pawłowska J, Humber RA, Kodsueb R, SánchezCastro I, Goto BT, Silva DKA, De Souza FA, Oehl F, Da Silva GA, Silva IR, Błaszkowski J, Jobim K, Maia LC, Barbosa FR, Fiuza PO, Divakar PK, Shenoy BD, Castañeda-Ruiz RF, Somrithipol S, Karunarathna SC, Tibpromma S, Mortimer PE, Wanasinghe DN, Phookamsak R, Xu J, Wang Y, Fenghua T, Alvarado P, Li DW KI, Matočec N, SSN M, Papizadeh M, Heredia G, Wartchow F, Bakhshi M, Boehm E, Youssef N, Hustad VP, Lawrey JD, Santiago ALCMA, Bezerra JDP, Souza-Motta CM, Firmino AL, Tian Q, Houbraken J, Hongsanan S, Tanaka K, Dissanayake AJ, Monteiro JS, Grossart HP, Suija A, Weerakoon G, Etayo J, Tsurykau A, Kuhnert E, Vázquez V, Mungai P, Damm U, Li QR, Zhang H, Boonmee S, Lu YZ, Becerra AG, Kendrick B, FQ B, Motiejűnaitë J, Sharma B, Khare R, Gaikwad S, Wijesundara DSA, Tang LZ, He MQ, Flakus A, Rodriguez-Flakus P, Zhurbenko MP, McKenzie EHC, Stadler M, Bhat DJ, Liu JK, Raza M, Jeewon R, Nassonova ES, Prieto M, Jayalal RG, Yurkov A, Schnittler M, Shchepin ON, Fan XL, Dissanayake LS, Erdodu M (2020)

Outline of fungi and fungus-like taxa

Mycosphere

1060

‑

1456

. https://doi.org/10.5943/mycosphere/11/1/8

Zhang Y, Crous PW, Schoch CL, Hyde KD (2012)

Pleosporales

Fungal Diversity

‑

221

. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13225-011-0117-x

Supplementary material

Endnotes